Hey Everyone ! So this 14-24mm lens looks really promising. IF you can tell I'm a little bit confused because I LOVE my 14-30mm. It will come down to me being able to use my 100mm Filters on it and that remains to be seen... Although I know one company that wants to get working on a Holder already ;) fingers crossed. Also I Know you all love sample images I want to hold off and take some really nice images with this lens so I will do a sample image video. I Just haven't had time to go out and shoot some great images with it yet, but I will very soon ! Again thank you all so much for watching !
As a landscape shooter (and big 100 mm filter user) I can't see myself swapping out my 14-30 for the 14-24....not to mention the cost element 😋. However, I am still very interested to see how the image quality differs between the two lenses around f/8 to f/13. Looking forward to your video with a more detailed look. 👍
I wouldn't consider this lens unless NiSi, specifically, comes out with a stepping ring or something that would allow me to use my existing 100mm system with the lens. So, I'm with you on this quandary. I'm also quite happy with the 14-30mm. Not to mention that the 70-200 with teleconverter is more tempting at the moment and I'm trying to convince myself to work that into my budget. I think it's time to start selling F-mount equivalents.
Ricci Talks great video as always👌 it’s the same for me, if they can bring out a filter holder for me Lee 100 system I’m definitely ordering this lens!!
I feel in love with my 14-30 just like you. I sold off my 150mm filters and I love how small and compact the 14-30 is. If Nikon can make a filter adapter that can allow 100mm slot filters then the might have a winner. They should’ve had that at launch. It’s a rough year though
The practicality of the 14-30 and the 82mm filter thread was a big part of what got me convinced to go Z. I don't think I'd trade that for a little extra sharpness and a stop of light. Really looking forward to the 50 f/1.2 video. I have high hopes for that lens.
I think for astro/nightscapes the extra stop will be very useful. And I suspect it will have better corner coma control. I eagerly await your testing in comparison tot he 14-30. In your testing, along with your usual process, please test specular pinpoint highlights at the corners, or just do a night time astro comparison if you are able. Thanks Ricci.
@@EvilNeedle90 Sure, that's a nice lens, but it hasn't got a 14mm setting. It depends on how well the coma is corrected on this new lens as to which I might settle on. I also think that with modern sensors f/2.8 is bright enough for astro, as long as the trade off is a zoom lens.
Hi Ricci, looking forward to your in-depth review of 14-24, and also the comparison against 14-30. I am looking for native Z ultra-wide and I am trying to understand what the 14-24 will bring (apart from a wider aperture). Thanks & keep up the good works :)
You focused so much on the filters. I'm pretty sure, that filters manufacturers are designing the adapters at the moment. Just wait a bit for it :). Regarding the f/4 vs f/2.8 - different purposes. I'd use f/4 as a go-to lens and streetphoto. For more demanding/challenging situations - take the f/2.8.
Thank you Ricci great insight. However, from a landscape/architectural/cityscape the 14-30 f/4 is a dream-come-true lens (compact, light weight, takes filters, and sharp as hell + extra range). So I think the new 14-24 f/2.8 will more useful for photojournalism. By the way, the 20mm f/1.8 s has already found its way to most astro shooters.
Hi Ricci, this morning, I have received finally the Nikon Neutral Color NC Filter 112mm for the Nikon Z 14-24 mm f/2.8! I ordered it in December 2020 but it was out of stock for months. I am glad that I have this filter. Accordingly, from now on, I can use my Nikon Z 14-24 mm f/2.8 anywhere, especially in the nature and even under rainy conditions (I like taking pix under the rain), without worrying about the front element of the lens.
This lens means a lot for people who both shoot landscape and astrophotography. I really hope it can take 100mm square filters since I also own a bunch of them like you do...
Hi! Are you planning on doing a detailed comparison review of this lens verses the z 14-30 f/4? I currently own the 14-30 and I'm considering upgrading but would love to have more information on how they perform against each other. Thank you!
I am pretty certain that big 3rd party manufacturers like Nisi or Lee gonna make their own filter holder for this beauty so you can use your existing rectangular filters as well. Anyways, it is already a big step up that you have the option to use circular filters. Man, Nikon Z system is getting better and better. Since I am into mostly shooting wildlife I cannot wait for their telephoto lenses like the 100-400. I can barely imagine what a Z 300mm F2.8 prime would do if the F mount version was already near perfection. Exciting times are coming, we gonna get spoiled :)
Excellent video Ricci! I would love to see a lens/picture quality comparison between the F4 and F2.8S. I've already got quite a collection of Z glass, but am thinking of adding the F2.8 to my collection, or the F4 - one of them will be a Christmas gift to self. Thanks again for the great content - these lenses are amazing. Take care and stay safe - Chris.
Great video Ricci! I purchased the Z 14-30 S because the Z 14-24 S was not available and sure enough, 1 week later B&H shipped me the Z 14-14 S because I preordered it! I have since purchased the new Filter Holder for the Z 14-24 S and it is amazing! My question to you or anyone else here, is it now worth it for me to keep both lenses? Seems kind of redundant, especially since the Z 14-24 is so small and light and really not that much bigger than the Z 14-30 S....
My pre-order just came in I've been using the F Mount version for a long time this one has the best colour I've ever seen out of any Ultra wide lense..... Line are so straight (Best I've ever seen) so far I love working with it and the files, I also have the 14-30 but this one is going to be main work horse I'm surprised how much I like the display on it as well I really like that it tells me the focal length so clearly... Sometimes I would not quite to get it quite right on the other lenses but this one you just know it's right
Hadn't realized it had such an interesting lens hood/cap system - I love the idea of being able to put a lens cap over the hood rather than the lens itself. It's just so much more convenient, and I love that Nikon is including all this with the lens. That might explain part of the higher than expected price.
@@RicciTalks Yes, I would honestly have expected them as pricey accessories - even if I don't use filters I will still want to use that huge lens hood and cap most of the time, but I like having the smaller hood and cap for if I want a more compact kit.
@@RicciTalks Yes, I would honestly have expected them as pricey accessories - even if I don't use filters I will still want to use that huge lens hood and cap most of the time, but I like having the smaller hood and cap for if I want a more compact kit.
Shows lens cap.....pulls out dustbin lid lol 😁 Whilst some will bemoan the filter issue with this lens, those who never use filters like myself who want a superwide fast f2.8 zoom for events will rejoice! As you said, the 14 to 30 f4 is likely more than sufficient for the majority of landscape photogs using filters who likely are stopping the lens down anyway. This completes the f2.8 trinity for event photographers and that's an important market. For those who still want to use their existing filter sets with the new 14 to 24 I've no doubt the main players in this field ( Lee, etc ) will have adapters availible sooner than later. I wouldn't even be surprised if Nikon hadn't already been in touch with many third party manufacturers in advance of launch ( much like cellphone manufacturers pass yet to be officially released external phone specs so protective covers are availible on the day of launch). You've already proved your existing Lee set just needs an appropriate mount ring, it's hardly rocket science for Lee to manufacture such a device and I'm sure they will 😉
Ricci, thank you very much for the video. Can you please compare it also with 14-24/2.8 F-Mount, for coma and transmission (T-stop) and your thoughts about switsching to Nikon-z plus this lens for nightscapes and astro-photography. I think, many people would be interested to get this information.
I haven’t seen any images from this lens yet but Nikons track record with these new Z mount lenses is stellar. I am sure this is a must have lens for landscape/starlight shooters as well as wedding photographers. The ability to use screw on filters is fantastic.
For me the Nisi aluminium lens hood, a Kase Wolverine 112mm magnetic adapter ring and then the Kase Wolverine 112mm circular filters were the way to go. There is a nisi 150mm and 100mm adapter for this lens, the later allows the switch to be used. The former then allow the v system adapter to be used. While I am largely done with ND GRADS, they are useful but when deep in mountains or valleys or by cliff sides being able to take down, say, 4-stops of highlights to even out the exposure, while slowing down water is a big advantage. So magnetic wolverine CPL, night and various strength NDs is one route. The NISI 150 OR 100 with rectangular or square filters including NDHARD OR NDSOFT edged filters is the bigger to carry alternative. I put both in the car, but tender to only fly with the smaller circular filter system. Always leaving the cheap plastic Nikon hoods unmolested in their original boxes.
Nice, Ricci! I love my 14-24 F-mount, but wow... big weight difference, and presumably, better image quality. Looking forward to when you review the details. Take care!
I got tired of waiting for 14-24 so I bought 14-30f4 this summer. So far I'm happy with it but I do not like its bokeh. I would like to see a more in-depth comparison between 14-24 and 14-30, also how bokeh performs at 2.8
I almost always have a polarizer on my lenses, but I dont shoot a ton of ultrawide. As much as I love the 2.8 aperture, there is no way I will justify the massive size increase of the filter attached 14-24 f/2.8 over the filter attached 14-30 f/4. When I go to Z in the next year or so, it will be the 14-30 f/4.
Glad you exist and great job on all comparisons. I still don't know how you do it and get the lenses so quick but glad you do. I do wonder how the likes of the Tamron 15-30mm G2 version will compare with its inbuilt stabilisation as it didn't look too good on the new 14-24 on the wide end. Then again like the old nikon 14-24, I don't think you'd walk around with the massive 15-30 tamron :). Nice job once again and look forward to the comparison and the 50mm 1.2.
I can use lee sw150 filter holder with the large filters on the 14-30 lens with a round adaptor screw in ring available from lee filters. I’m sure there will be some company making some adaptor for the new lens.
I am currently shooting with a 14-30 with a z7, picture quality is definitely great, even better then the 16-35 gm that I once had. To me the new 14-24 is cool but I think it will only be necessary for shooting stars and indoor
The 14-30mm at f/4 is not particularly sharp at the edges. Being able to shoot the 14-24mm at f/4 hopefully will produce sharp images across the frame.
lcador9 maybe it's because I mainly use 14-30 for landscape with a tripod at f/8. So to me, edge sharpness is still outstanding. 14-24 f2.8 is truly for professionals that shoot in diverse conditions, but for me who mainly shoot landscape, 14-30 is good enough with that weight and price
@@tofu5275 Your right, it depends on your use case. I produce a lot of large prints for gallery sale that were shot at 14mm and above f/10. Good enough just doesn't cut it. I don't want to be forced to shoot at 16mm to get better edges nor to stack images at f/8 or wider. I also shoot wide on the streets and at darker events where f/2.8 and a sharper f/4 just works. Quality does come at a price. Replaced the 14-30 with the 20mm f/1.8 and waited for the 14-24 to arrive. Did love the weight and size of the 14-30.
Cokin makes a 112mm adapter ring for their system. Don’t know if it will work on this hood. Hope NiSi or Lee come out with a dedicated holder for this lens. Looking forward to your IQ reviews!
@@peterlooper7956 thanks watched already but he compared it with old nikon f mount 14-24f2.8, z 14-30f4. He mentioned he will do astro later, maybe then he will compare it with 20 f1.8...Hope Ricci's video will come by then too.
Cant wait for tests of this one. This is the frustrating thing with Nikon Z gear, there are barely any reviews on the gear, they really need to get this stuff into the hands of a variety of photographers to test out, especially I would love to see its astro credentials.
The Z-Trinity is complete! Time to acquire some glass for my nifty z 50. With social distancing these trio of pro lenses will make my baby sing (z 50) sing
interesting video, would be nice to compare all the wide angle lenses for the Z's together, ie the 20, 24, 14-30,14-24, and some offerings from laowa and Samsung , they have a 15 and 19 mm offerings in the Z mount, be good to contrast the primes to the zoom offerings, when each would be appropriate, what each is good for, etc.
Most landscape photographer will always shoot at higher aperture values. Where the f2.8 really would shine is for those that do Astro photography or anything at night time. The z6 and z7 do very well in high ISOs so the f4 would be my go to lens.
nice presentation. I have understood Z14-30 F/4 is very good, cheap, light and enough for architecture,... and i suppose on tripod for esate photography in narrow rooms,... on tripod. What about street phoography of people and night city photography of bars, lights,... handheld ? I am surprised how my iphone 12 pro max makes nice night city photography so I suppose z6ii+14-30 should be much better. what is your latest Z14-30 review ? the one vs Z 20mm F/1.8 ?
Do you think filter makers will look to just do a drop in filter for that rear mount instead, since it would make more since vs the massive front built system as far as square filter users ?
i would appreciate it if you compare the distribution of this lens with the 14-30mm before correction and after correction, specially if there is people near the corner
Only seeing a brief photo of the filter hood it appears that you could simply cut off the two petals and then be able to screw on an adapter for your square filters. If that is the case it might be worth it to buy an extra good and adapt it.
Lovely Lens but 112mm Filters and I can use Standard NISI filters on my 14-30 F4 ..No ways can I afford a new systenm for ONE lens ..I am sticking with 14-30
Great video, most informative one I've seen so far. I have the nisi filter system for the 14-24 f mount and really hoping they can create an adaptor for the 14-24s. I really don't like the screw in filters.
Looking forward for test shots and comparison. Everyone is saying that Sony 12-24 2.8 is the best lens ever, hopefully new Nikon's lens can change that 😁.
Ive never understood why lenses do not have a filter thread on the outside of the lens. That way you could add an attachment and a simple way of adding a further step up to add a filter holder
Would be very interested if you could maybe take a shot of some stars this this, if its anything like the G mount I will surely be a healthy investment. Cheers Ricci
I know this may not be the correct place to ask - but you do know a lote about Nikon lenses. Is it possible to use the new Z teleconverters with the FTZ adapter and my 300 mm pf F mount lens ?? or is that just a crap solution ??
He actually discussed that in his video on the Z teleconverters, it's pretty detailed. No, you can't do it, the teleconverters will not physically mount to the FTZ. You need an F mount teleconverter for F mount lenses + the FTZ
A non-photographic question............. Do you pronounce your name "Riki" "Ree Chee" or in some other fashion? Love your reviews. Yours is the first site I visit whenever a new piece of equipment is in the wind. /Another Bob
Love watching your videos for the info and updates, unfortunately, unlike most of your other viewers, my pocket isn’t that deep to actually own these beauties😞
I bought the professional NISI 100mlm filter kit for the 14-30. Spent 12 or $1300 on it. I love the idea of the 14 to 24, especially for astro or National parks, but there’s no way I’m buying another filter kit.
at this point i'm torn between getting the 14-30 for landscape and maybe the 20 1.8 for astro, or just get the 14-24... if my squared filters work i think I'm going to choose the 14-24. cheaper (or pretty much same price) and lighter than the other 2 combined, but supposedly better quality!
Can't get over the insane pricing on the Z 14-24. Like the AF-S 14-24 wasn't expensive enough :p My guess is that tamron and sigma haven't started making any Z glass yet
@RicciTalks Hi, I've been searching your RUclips channel to find a comparison of the image quality between the Z14-30 f/4 S and the Z 14-24 f/2.8 S. I found a video with a first look of the Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S and a video about using filters on that lens. Can you please point me to the rughtvideo? Thanks in advance.
Though I personally prefer to have the filter on-board while shooting, as time went on, I found that it started to become less and less logical. Yes, I know it's been done for years. But all through my F11 and F5 days, I can remember racing through my filters to get the shot before the light changed. I can also remember getting myself all up in a uncomfortable fit because I wasn't fast enough. I still use my circular polorizers and don't see myself changing that, but what I did change was having any other filters at the shoot. it was the fact that my best filters may cost $200 each and I'm placing them in front of the glass of a lens that cost $4K! Eventually, I had to admit that it didn't seem like a very good idea to cover up $4000 glass with a $200 filter. Shooting in RAW images, the DNG files give me the subtle filter options I want in a post session. Therefore, the shot is taken through the lens's glass and the filters are added later on. I don't find myself in some frantic race to get the filter/s I need only to lose the light I had. I don't fell my blood pressure going up and the cost of the filters is no longer something I need to factor in, (with exception to UV and Circ Pol). I shoot a heavy camera as it is, (Nikon D4S), and at 65 years old, the equipment is getting heavier with each trip I take. I only have to carry small 6-filter, bag strapped to my belt for the UV and Circ Pols. I know not everyone likes to do the filtering in post for a half dozen reasons that really boil down to personal preferences. I've even put images that I shot with filters on the lens, next to images where I added them in post and then asked several people to tell me if they could tell the difference. No one could, (even I couldn't). As for the Z7 and the 14-24, I can see myself carrying around something like that in the near future. The camera body itself would be about 35% lighter than a D4S and at this point, that may be all it takes for me. Thanks for the video. Of course, it was an easy thumbs up vote for me to make. Rich
Terry Breedlove I think B+W are the only ones who currently make such huge screw on filters (besides Nikon themselves, but they are asking almost $800 for theirs). I use the 82mm version on my 14-30 and it is really good. Very good conservation of contrast and almost no tint
I would probably sell my arse for this, might need to since it’s 4 grand in Australia. This is a masterpiece, it’s a must have for me, would love to see its Astro credentials tested.
Hey Everyone !
So this 14-24mm lens looks really promising. IF you can tell I'm a little bit confused because I LOVE my 14-30mm.
It will come down to me being able to use my 100mm Filters on it and that remains to be seen... Although I know one company that wants to get working on a Holder already ;) fingers crossed.
Also I Know you all love sample images I want to hold off and take some really nice images with this lens so I will do a sample image video. I Just haven't had time to go out and shoot some great images with it yet, but I will very soon !
Again thank you all so much for watching !
Looking forward to your comparison video, thanks!!
As a landscape shooter (and big 100 mm filter user) I can't see myself swapping out my 14-30 for the 14-24....not to mention the cost element 😋. However, I am still very interested to see how the image quality differs between the two lenses around f/8 to f/13. Looking forward to your video with a more detailed look. 👍
I wouldn't consider this lens unless NiSi, specifically, comes out with a stepping ring or something that would allow me to use my existing 100mm system with the lens. So, I'm with you on this quandary. I'm also quite happy with the 14-30mm. Not to mention that the 70-200 with teleconverter is more tempting at the moment and I'm trying to convince myself to work that into my budget. I think it's time to start selling F-mount equivalents.
Ricci Talks great video as always👌 it’s the same for me, if they can bring out a filter holder for me Lee 100 system I’m definitely ordering this lens!!
I feel in love with my 14-30 just like you. I sold off my 150mm filters and I love how small and compact the 14-30 is. If Nikon can make a filter adapter that can allow 100mm slot filters then the might have a winner. They should’ve had that at launch. It’s a rough year though
I’d love to see a direct comparison between this lens and the z 14-30mm f4. 🙏🏼🙏🏼
The practicality of the 14-30 and the 82mm filter thread was a big part of what got me convinced to go Z. I don't think I'd trade that for a little extra sharpness and a stop of light.
Really looking forward to the 50 f/1.2 video. I have high hopes for that lens.
It’s certainly a tough choice !
But I suppose it’s good to have a choice !
other reviews show the 14-30 to be even sharper. So the 14-30f4 is the sharpest nikon wide angle lens now.
Excellent first look and super useful thoughts on the lens. I'm amazed by how small and light it is for a 14-24 f/2.8. Good job Nikon!
A filter holder adapter that attaches like the lens hood yet holds square filters would be great, someone with a 3D printer will surely make one
There’s a few people working on it ;)
here it is :) nisiopticsusa.com/product/nisi-100mm-filter-holder-for-nikon-z-14-24mm-f-2-8-s-no-vignetting/
Can’t wait to see your quality comparison of this new lens vs the 14-30.
I think for astro/nightscapes the extra stop will be very useful. And I suspect it will have better corner coma control. I eagerly await your testing in comparison tot he 14-30. In your testing, along with your usual process, please test specular pinpoint highlights at the corners, or just do a night time astro comparison if you are able. Thanks Ricci.
I’ll always try
i think that the astro photogs go for the 20/1.8 instead
@@EvilNeedle90 Sure, that's a nice lens, but it hasn't got a 14mm setting. It depends on how well the coma is corrected on this new lens as to which I might settle on. I also think that with modern sensors f/2.8 is bright enough for astro, as long as the trade off is a zoom lens.
Are you close to doing a comparison between the 14-24mm and the 14-30mm? I just picked up a used Z6 and will want a wide angle lens.
thanks! you are making the best Nikon reviews at the moment on youtube. Lot's of useful information ...
i would love the 14-24mm for landscape, but here in Australia the price is 4k au thats to much for this kid. ill stick to my 14-30mm.
Hi Ricci, looking forward to your in-depth review of 14-24, and also the comparison against 14-30. I am looking for native Z ultra-wide and I am trying to understand what the 14-24 will bring (apart from a wider aperture). Thanks & keep up the good works :)
You focused so much on the filters. I'm pretty sure, that filters manufacturers are designing the adapters at the moment. Just wait a bit for it :). Regarding the f/4 vs f/2.8 - different purposes. I'd use f/4 as a go-to lens and streetphoto. For more demanding/challenging situations - take the f/2.8.
Thank you Ricci great insight. However, from a landscape/architectural/cityscape the 14-30 f/4 is a dream-come-true lens (compact, light weight, takes filters, and sharp as hell + extra range). So I think the new 14-24 f/2.8 will more useful for photojournalism. By the way, the 20mm f/1.8 s has already found its way to most astro shooters.
I agree hence why I mention the 14-30 so much it’s the perfect wide for so many people
Hi Ricci, this morning, I have received finally the Nikon Neutral Color NC Filter 112mm for the Nikon Z 14-24 mm f/2.8! I ordered it in December 2020 but it was out of stock for months. I am glad that I have this filter. Accordingly, from now on, I can use my Nikon Z 14-24 mm f/2.8 anywhere, especially in the nature and even under rainy conditions (I like taking pix under the rain), without worrying about the front element of the lens.
This lens means a lot for people who both shoot landscape and astrophotography. I really hope it can take 100mm square filters since I also own a bunch of them like you do...
trying to imagine the size of 100cm filters....
Craig Kirk lol my bad
NiSi just released a holder today :)
nisiopticsusa.com/product/nisi-100mm-filter-holder-for-nikon-z-14-24mm-f-2-8-s-no-vignetting/
Hi! Are you planning on doing a detailed comparison review of this lens verses the z 14-30 f/4? I currently own the 14-30 and I'm considering upgrading but would love to have more information on how they perform against each other. Thank you!
Hi, Ricci. Any chance of a full preview of this lens? Thanks!
I am pretty certain that big 3rd party manufacturers like Nisi or Lee gonna make their own filter holder for this beauty so you can use your existing rectangular filters as well. Anyways, it is already a big step up that you have the option to use circular filters. Man, Nikon Z system is getting better and better. Since I am into mostly shooting wildlife I cannot wait for their telephoto lenses like the 100-400. I can barely imagine what a Z 300mm F2.8 prime would do if the F mount version was already near perfection. Exciting times are coming, we gonna get spoiled :)
NiSi just released a holder today :)
nisiopticsusa.com/product/nisi-100mm-filter-holder-for-nikon-z-14-24mm-f-2-8-s-no-vignetting/
Excellent video Ricci! I would love to see a lens/picture quality comparison between the F4 and F2.8S. I've already got quite a collection of Z glass, but am thinking of adding the F2.8 to my collection, or the F4 - one of them will be a Christmas gift to self. Thanks again for the great content - these lenses are amazing. Take care and stay safe - Chris.
Thanks for watching !!!
Hi, Ricci. Are you doing a follow up of this with a full review? Thanks.
Great video Ricci! I purchased the Z 14-30 S because the Z 14-24 S was not available and sure enough, 1 week later B&H shipped me the Z 14-14 S because I preordered it! I have since purchased the new Filter Holder for the Z 14-24 S and it is amazing! My question to you or anyone else here, is it now worth it for me to keep both lenses? Seems kind of redundant, especially since the Z 14-24 is so small and light and really not that much bigger than the Z 14-30 S....
My pre-order just came in I've been using the F Mount version for a long time this one has the best colour I've ever seen out of any Ultra wide lense..... Line are so straight (Best I've ever seen) so far I love working with it and the files, I also have the 14-30 but this one is going to be main work horse
I'm surprised how much I like the display on it as well I really like that it tells me the focal length so clearly... Sometimes I would not quite to get it quite right on the other lenses but this one you just know it's right
Hadn't realized it had such an interesting lens hood/cap system - I love the idea of being able to put a lens cap over the hood rather than the lens itself. It's just so much more convenient, and I love that Nikon is including all this with the lens. That might explain part of the higher than expected price.
Regarding filters, I will probably go for rear gel filters over those huge expensive front filters.
There has been a lot of thought put in to its accessories and it’s great they all come in the box instead of optional extras.
@@RicciTalks Yes, I would honestly have expected them as pricey accessories - even if I don't use filters I will still want to use that huge lens hood and cap most of the time, but I like having the smaller hood and cap for if I want a more compact kit.
@@RicciTalks Yes, I would honestly have expected them as pricey accessories - even if I don't use filters I will still want to use that huge lens hood and cap most of the time, but I like having the smaller hood and cap for if I want a more compact kit.
Please do some infinity tests as well as your usual indoor test that you do. Thanks
Shows lens cap.....pulls out dustbin lid lol 😁 Whilst some will bemoan the filter issue with this lens, those who never use filters like myself who want a superwide fast f2.8 zoom for events will rejoice! As you said, the 14 to 30 f4 is likely more than sufficient for the majority of landscape photogs using filters who likely are stopping the lens down anyway. This completes the f2.8 trinity for event photographers and that's an important market. For those who still want to use their existing filter sets with the new 14 to 24 I've no doubt the main players in this field ( Lee, etc ) will have adapters availible sooner than later. I wouldn't even be surprised if Nikon hadn't already been in touch with many third party manufacturers in advance of launch ( much like cellphone manufacturers pass yet to be officially released external phone specs so protective covers are availible on the day of launch). You've already proved your existing Lee set just needs an appropriate mount ring, it's hardly rocket science for Lee to manufacture such a device and I'm sure they will 😉
Ricci, thank you very much for the video. Can you please compare it also with 14-24/2.8 F-Mount, for coma and transmission (T-stop) and your thoughts about switsching to Nikon-z plus this lens for nightscapes and astro-photography. I think, many people would be interested to get this information.
I haven’t seen any images from this lens yet but Nikons track record with these new Z mount lenses is stellar. I am sure this is a must have lens for landscape/starlight shooters as well as wedding photographers. The ability to use screw on filters is fantastic.
hey Ricci, thank you for the nice new information about the new Z 14-24mm F2.8S please i want to ask does this lense have zero distortion
For me the Nisi aluminium lens hood, a Kase Wolverine 112mm magnetic adapter ring and then the Kase Wolverine 112mm circular filters were the way to go.
There is a nisi 150mm and 100mm adapter for this lens, the later allows the switch to be used. The former then allow the v system adapter to be used.
While I am largely done with ND GRADS, they are useful but when deep in mountains or valleys or by cliff sides being able to take down, say, 4-stops of highlights to even out the exposure, while slowing down water is a big advantage. So magnetic wolverine CPL, night and various strength NDs is one route. The NISI 150 OR 100 with rectangular or square filters including NDHARD OR NDSOFT edged filters is the bigger to carry alternative. I put both in the car, but tender to only fly with the smaller circular filter system. Always leaving the cheap plastic Nikon hoods unmolested in their original boxes.
I was hoping you'd demonstrate how to use the slide in gels on the rear! Do you have a video on that too?
Nice, Ricci! I love my 14-24 F-mount, but wow... big weight difference, and presumably, better image quality. Looking forward to when you review the details. Take care!
I got tired of waiting for 14-24 so I bought 14-30f4 this summer. So far I'm happy with it but I do not like its bokeh. I would like to see a more in-depth comparison between 14-24 and 14-30, also how bokeh performs at 2.8
I almost always have a polarizer on my lenses, but I dont shoot a ton of ultrawide. As much as I love the 2.8 aperture, there is no way I will justify the massive size increase of the filter attached 14-24 f/2.8 over the filter attached 14-30 f/4. When I go to Z in the next year or so, it will be the 14-30 f/4.
Glad you exist and great job on all comparisons. I still don't know how you do it and get the lenses so quick but glad you do. I do wonder how the likes of the Tamron 15-30mm G2 version will compare with its inbuilt stabilisation as it didn't look too good on the new 14-24 on the wide end. Then again like the old nikon 14-24, I don't think you'd walk around with the massive 15-30 tamron :). Nice job once again and look forward to the comparison and the 50mm 1.2.
I’m glad I exist too 😉
I can use lee sw150 filter holder with the large filters on the 14-30 lens with a round adaptor screw in ring available from lee filters. I’m sure there will be some company making some adaptor for the new lens.
I am currently shooting with a 14-30 with a z7, picture quality is definitely great, even better then the 16-35 gm that I once had. To me the new 14-24 is cool but I think it will only be necessary for shooting stars and indoor
The 14-30mm at f/4 is not particularly sharp at the edges. Being able to shoot the 14-24mm at f/4 hopefully will produce sharp images across the frame.
lcador9 maybe it's because I mainly use 14-30 for landscape with a tripod at f/8. So to me, edge sharpness is still outstanding. 14-24 f2.8 is truly for professionals that shoot in diverse conditions, but for me who mainly shoot landscape, 14-30 is good enough with that weight and price
@@tofu5275 Your right, it depends on your use case. I produce a lot of large prints for gallery sale that were shot at 14mm and above f/10. Good enough just doesn't cut it. I don't want to be forced to shoot at 16mm to get better edges nor to stack images at f/8 or wider. I also shoot wide on the streets and at darker events where f/2.8 and a sharper f/4 just works. Quality does come at a price. Replaced the 14-30 with the 20mm f/1.8 and waited for the 14-24 to arrive. Did love the weight and size of the 14-30.
Bravo Ricci, you have the best access to Nikon gear on RUclips! Lucky man!
Hey Ricci, do you plan to have compare of Z14-24 vs Z14-30 lenses?
Hi Ricci! Are u going to do a vid on the latest firmware update? I installed it but do not know what changes it brings.
Cokin makes a 112mm adapter ring for their system. Don’t know if it will work on this hood. Hope NiSi or Lee come out with a dedicated holder for this lens. Looking forward to your IQ reviews!
Ricci is a 🌟 love his channel.
nice lens would love to see a comparison with nikon z 20mm f1.8s also
There is a comparison here: ruclips.net/video/vTKMA86fylg/видео.html
@@peterlooper7956 thanks watched already but he compared it with old nikon f mount 14-24f2.8, z 14-30f4. He mentioned he will do astro later, maybe then he will compare it with 20 f1.8...Hope Ricci's video will come by then too.
So how do you like it for astrophotography? As compared to the 14-30mm F/4S?
super useful video as always. I waited on the 14 30 for this reason. eagerly waiting for your comparison of these two lenses.
Cant wait for tests of this one. This is the frustrating thing with Nikon Z gear, there are barely any reviews on the gear, they really need to get this stuff into the hands of a variety of photographers to test out, especially I would love to see its astro credentials.
Thank you for the video. I have a little question plz. Do you think any 112mm filter size will fit on this lens or they have different thread pitch?
You probably all ready have a shooting schedule, but I’d like to see some indoor picture comparison - maybe a theater or cathedral.
Great ideas
The Z-Trinity is complete! Time to acquire some glass for my nifty z 50. With social distancing these trio of pro lenses will make my baby sing (z 50) sing
Hi Ricci, do you mean, it's a big different 14-24 mm 2,8 to 14-30 mm 4,0?
Thank you for the review. I hope you give us (vs 14-30 4.0S) =)
It's should be easy to design only adapter ring that lock in to lens hood slot then you will be able to use 100mm filter. Thank for the quick look.
NiSi just released a holder today :)
nisiopticsusa.com/product/nisi-100mm-filter-holder-for-nikon-z-14-24mm-f-2-8-s-no-vignetting/
would be cool to see a Z 14-24mm F2.8S vs Z 14-30mm F4S comparison. Really like my F4, but I keep dreaming about the F2.8 version..
interesting video, would be nice to compare all the wide angle lenses for the Z's together, ie the 20, 24, 14-30,14-24, and some offerings from laowa and Samsung , they have a 15 and 19 mm offerings in the Z mount, be good to contrast the primes to the zoom offerings, when each would be appropriate, what each is good for, etc.
I just spoke with NiSi, they are coming out with a 150mm S6 mount in the next month or so.
Awesome video. When are you going to compare the optical quality?
I have a doubt ricci, should i buy 14-24 z or 14-30 and a third party 14mm for landscape and nightscape photography (85-15%)
Outstanding preview of this unbelievable lens
Most landscape photographer will always shoot at higher aperture values. Where the f2.8 really would shine is for those that do Astro photography or anything at night time. The z6 and z7 do very well in high ISOs so the f4 would be my go to lens.
Thank for a good intro to this lens but what about the drop in filters ?
nice presentation. I have understood Z14-30 F/4 is very good, cheap, light and enough for architecture,... and i suppose on tripod for esate photography in narrow rooms,... on tripod.
What about street phoography of people and night city photography of bars, lights,... handheld ? I am surprised how my iphone 12 pro max makes nice night city photography so I suppose z6ii+14-30 should be much better. what is your latest Z14-30 review ? the one vs Z 20mm F/1.8 ?
Do you think filter makers will look to just do a drop in filter for that rear mount instead, since it would make more since vs the massive front built system as far as square filter users ?
The advantage of front filters is using a grad filter and an ND FILTER at the same time
NiSi just released a holder today :)
nisiopticsusa.com/product/nisi-100mm-filter-holder-for-nikon-z-14-24mm-f-2-8-s-no-vignetting/
i would appreciate it if you compare the distribution of this lens with the 14-30mm before correction and after correction, specially if there is people near the corner
I'm pretty sure I could design and 3D print a filter holder adapter for your Nisi holder if you're interested?
NiSi just released it today :)
nisiopticsusa.com/product/nisi-100mm-filter-holder-for-nikon-z-14-24mm-f-2-8-s-no-vignetting/
Only seeing a brief photo of the filter hood it appears that you could simply cut off the two petals and then be able to screw on an adapter for your square filters. If that is the case it might be worth it to buy an extra good and adapt it.
Should say extra hood at the end. Auto correct keeps changing it. Lol
Just a question: Is it worth it to change f lens with z lens always f2.8? Which are the differences between the two lenses? thank you
Lovely Lens but 112mm Filters and I can use Standard NISI filters on my 14-30 F4 ..No ways can I afford a new systenm for ONE lens ..I am sticking with 14-30
Great video, most informative one I've seen so far. I have the nisi filter system for the 14-24 f mount and really hoping they can create an adaptor for the 14-24s. I really don't like the screw in filters.
it has been released today :)
nisiopticsusa.com/product/nisi-100mm-filter-holder-for-nikon-z-14-24mm-f-2-8-s-no-vignetting/
Buy the 14-30 f4 for landscape, buy the samyang 12mm or 14mm 2.8 for astro.
very nice. looking forward to seeing the usage of backend filter
Looking forward for test shots and comparison. Everyone is saying that Sony 12-24 2.8 is the best lens ever, hopefully new Nikon's lens can change that 😁.
It’s not as wide for sure but it’s lighter 😊
Please also compare the image quality between them, Sir.
Adding a canon rf wide angle in the comparison would be super interesting.
And humiliating for Canon as well 😅 I don't know if nikon can "improve" those 4+ stops of vignetting from the Canon rf
Ive never understood why lenses do not have a filter thread on the outside of the lens. That way you could add an attachment and a simple way of adding a further step up to add a filter holder
Would be very interested if you could maybe take a shot of some stars this this, if its anything like the G mount I will surely be a healthy investment. Cheers Ricci
Excellent thank you. To buy someday I'm sure.
I know this may not be the correct place to ask - but you do know a lote about Nikon lenses.
Is it possible to use the new Z teleconverters with the FTZ adapter and my 300 mm pf F mount lens ??
or is that just a crap solution ??
He actually discussed that in his video on the Z teleconverters, it's pretty detailed. No, you can't do it, the teleconverters will not physically mount to the FTZ. You need an F mount teleconverter for F mount lenses + the FTZ
A non-photographic question............. Do you pronounce your name "Riki" "Ree Chee" or in some other fashion?
Love your reviews. Yours is the first site I visit whenever a new piece of equipment is in the wind. /Another Bob
My thinking is go with the 14-30 and buy an additional lens for night sky shooting
Love watching your videos for the info and updates, unfortunately, unlike most of your other viewers, my pocket isn’t that deep to actually own these beauties😞
Can we fit in case gel filters at the back side of this lense?
I bought the professional NISI 100mlm filter kit for the 14-30. Spent 12 or $1300 on it. I love the idea of the 14 to 24, especially for astro or National parks, but there’s no way I’m buying another filter kit.
I don’t want to buy another filter kit either. Really hoping for a 100mm adaptation.
NiSi just released a holder today :)
nisiopticsusa.com/product/nisi-100mm-filter-holder-for-nikon-z-14-24mm-f-2-8-s-no-vignetting/
Lens breathing will be interesting to know for focus shift shooting
at this point i'm torn between getting the 14-30 for landscape and maybe the 20 1.8 for astro, or just get the 14-24... if my squared filters work i think I'm going to choose the 14-24. cheaper (or pretty much same price) and lighter than the other 2 combined, but supposedly better quality!
NiSi just released a holder for 100mm filters today :)
nisiopticsusa.com/product/nisi-100mm-filter-holder-for-nikon-z-14-24mm-f-2-8-s-no-vignetting/
I think a 3d print of a modified lens cap will allow the 100mm filter holder to be attached
NiSi just released a holder today :)
nisiopticsusa.com/product/nisi-100mm-filter-holder-for-nikon-z-14-24mm-f-2-8-s-no-vignetting/
The filter slot in the back is useful for astrophotography.
Can't get over the insane pricing on the Z 14-24. Like the AF-S 14-24 wasn't expensive enough :p
My guess is that tamron and sigma haven't started making any Z glass yet
Ricci, please do a lowlight image quality comparisons of Z5 vs Z6. 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Thank you for the video. Hope this lens will be really available. :)
@RicciTalks
Hi,
I've been searching your RUclips channel to find a comparison of the image quality between the Z14-30 f/4 S and the Z 14-24 f/2.8 S. I found a video with a first look of the Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S and a video about using filters on that lens.
Can you please point me to the rughtvideo?
Thanks in advance.
Though I personally prefer to have the filter on-board while shooting, as time went on, I found that it started to become less and less logical. Yes, I know it's been done for years. But all through my F11 and F5 days, I can remember racing through my filters to get the shot before the light changed. I can also remember getting myself all up in a uncomfortable fit because I wasn't fast enough.
I still use my circular polorizers and don't see myself changing that, but what I did change was having any other filters at the shoot. it was the fact that my best filters may cost $200 each and I'm placing them in front of the glass of a lens that cost $4K! Eventually, I had to admit that it didn't seem like a very good idea to cover up $4000 glass with a $200 filter.
Shooting in RAW images, the DNG files give me the subtle filter options I want in a post session. Therefore, the shot is taken through the lens's glass and the filters are added later on. I don't find myself in some frantic race to get the filter/s I need only to lose the light I had. I don't fell my blood pressure going up and the cost of the filters is no longer something I need to factor in, (with exception to UV and Circ Pol).
I shoot a heavy camera as it is, (Nikon D4S), and at 65 years old, the equipment is getting heavier with each trip I take. I only have to carry small 6-filter, bag strapped to my belt for the UV and Circ Pols. I know not everyone likes to do the filtering in post for a half dozen reasons that really boil down to personal preferences.
I've even put images that I shot with filters on the lens, next to images where I added them in post and then asked several people to tell me if they could tell the difference. No one could, (even I couldn't). As for the Z7 and the 14-24, I can see myself carrying around something like that in the near future. The camera body itself would be about 35% lighter than a D4S and at this point, that may be all it takes for me.
Thanks for the video. Of course, it was an easy thumbs up vote for me to make.
Rich
Could you recommend some 112mm filters brand? I’m gonna need a ND filter for the 14-24 and so far Nikon only offers a NC and CPL filters.
Terry Breedlove I think B+W are the only ones who currently make such huge screw on filters (besides Nikon themselves, but they are asking almost $800 for theirs). I use the 82mm version on my 14-30 and it is really good. Very good conservation of contrast and almost no tint
Adding to the numerous requests for the 14-24 to 14-30 comparison. I’m sure it will come in time but I can’t help being impatient. 😅
As usual brilliantly informative
Thanks a lot ! 😊
@@RicciTalks Your the Nikon oracle
Can't wait for 50mm 1.2.
Did you just drop a little hint about the next level Z camera at 10:04 ?
Great lens ! LOOOOOOONG overdue
you're the best !!! thanks for the review.
I would probably sell my arse for this, might need to since it’s 4 grand in Australia. This is a masterpiece, it’s a must have for me, would love to see its Astro credentials tested.
I watch all your videos. please suggest me Quick Release Arca-Swiss Type Lens Plate for Nikon 200-500mm ?
kirk makes really nice lens feet or their adapter
Wish Nikon gave us a drop-in filter system instead of a slot for gels.
So now they are finally in order. All I need is a slight issue with a certain job removal pandemic to jog on and I can get back to work!
Will you re train me 😗 it's been a while 😎😁
Well I know that’s a lie. The things you know never leave you 😉
@@RicciTalks I just want an excuse to catch up. See you soon 😚