Justice for All with Judge Cristina Perez - Nanny Phone Home & Fast Fashion Faux Pas
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 мар 2024
- A nanny sues after her purse is stolen during a break in; Dispute over leisurewear that was advertised as exclusive, but sold elsewhere for less.
Welcome to Justice Central, the ultimate destination for your court TV cravings! ⚖️✨ Dive into the fascinating world of Justice with our lineup of nine incredible court TV shows. From dramatic rulings to heartfelt justice, we've got it all.
Justice Central lineup of Judges includes Supreme Justice with Judge Karen, America's Court with Judge Ross, Justice for the People with Judge Milian, We the People with Judge Lauren Lake, The Verdict with Judge Hatchett, Mathis Court with Judge Mathis, Equal Justice with Judge Eboni K Williams, Justice for All with Judge Cristina Perez, and Justice with Judge Mablean.
Don't miss a single case - find all of these captivating shows right here on Justice Central's RUclips channel, as well as on The Grio and your local TV listings. Subscribe now to stay up-to-date with the latest courtroom drama and legal showdowns! Justice awaits ⚖️
Follow Justice Central across the web:
Instagram: / justicecentraltv
Facebook: / justicecentraltv
TikTok: / justicecentral 
Развлечения
I giggled at "hide your kids, close your blinds, lock your door" 😂😭🤣
Mom you OUGHT to be GLAD to get rid of this IRRESPONSIBLE nanny. I hope she didn’t have anything to do with that robbery!
As retired nanny. It is unbelievable that the lady who was the nanny in the first case was very late picking up the kids. I was picking up the child. I was nannying for at her preschool and never once was late. That is just inexcusable. Secondly, if she left the house and left her purse in it with all this valuable stuff that is on her.
The amount of entitlement plaintiffs have on these court shows makes me mad! 😠 She didn't do her job, she was consistently late, she left her purse at the house. It wasn't the defendant's fault her purse was stolen. It was a robbery, the defendant was not negligent or do anything in anyway. The defendant even offered to reimburse her, she didn't have to, but she wanted to, even though the plaintiff was a horrible nanny.
The first defendant is hilarious 😂
Nanny needs to grow up and learn to keep things out of the reach of children. And always take your purse with you when you go anywhere.
She was an irresponsible 23 yr old omg be rid of her for good omg.. the nanny embarrassed herself seriously.. and leaving young kids at the bis stop for 45 mins plus wow how tf
Good this former nanny has learned that she has a lot of growing up to do and has pay back the loan money and give back the items they loaned her.
Don’t people keep their license in their purse?? Why would she leave her purse with her phone at the house. Was it a set up?? Who knows!
Second case, although you can see a store selling something similar, you cannot go to the online and say you want your money back. Life does not work that way. Some people never grow up and think that they are entitled.
Exactly she better move around lol
The plaintiff in the first case is the kind of person that makes you wonder how she manages to make it through the day or find her way home ! A very clues human being
Young and stupid is when generation whatever would call her, and irresponsible with her things.
Wouldn’t you normally bring your purse when you drive a car?
Those clothes look cheap AF.
2nd case: "designer" buys from cheap Chinese manufacturers then states it is exclusive. No one is going to make a few items, or they will for a hefty sum. Lots of fast fashion on the Internet.
This is why I don’t help people anymore. This world is full of ungrateful snobby people
11:51
18:12
The case is not about the kids. It’s about the theft. SMH.