From my experience, guys who play a decent 18/14 strategy don't normally ship three stacks with KK, but I guess the initial call from hero might have triggered him to rule out AA from hero's range. There's no other way to explain it. He might have folded if hero just 3-bet like in a normal situation and after villain 4-bet and hero 5-bet shipped he probably would have got the message and folded. So the tricky call might have done the job here.
Ya it's strange to see a reg call off that much but maybe there was some dynamic at play here that Evgeny can comment on. Also though, this is NL2, sometimes they just don't realize that it is 300bb.
i think that we should not play deep in zoom tables , because of the varianze and we cant recover oue money from the fish that have batbeat on us , so we i am more the 150bb in zoom i leave the table and reset my stack
In my opinion, at nl2 is a very bad idea to just call with AA, because I don't want to get to the flop with 3 or 4 guys, because when the flop comes we will loose at the end a lot of the times, specially if there are fishes who call with mid-pairs or ridiculous gut-shots and end up hitting their lucky card, so for me, always 3bet premium hands. That being said, the rest of the hand is well played, a painful bad beat. Great Hand review Nathan.
I was just thinking, from the villain's POV, would *anyone* have folded the KK when Hero shoves like this? Or am i insane? What hand is he doing this with - JJ, QQ, AK (having KK is possible but unlikely). At this level, if i have KK, i'm putting him on exactly what he has and know i have approx 20% chance. Would i be crazy to fold? I know he could turn up with rubbish, but would anyone ship with rubbish? Just thinking out loud. Edit: i wrote this before the end and just listened to Nathan saying to fold KK. Relieved to not be a mad man. Thanks for the content, Nathan
in this exact spot, i think the money was going in regardless of whether we made a standard 4 bet or shipped. That being said, I still would have preferred a 4-bet. I probably would have went to approx 1.20. I would have been looking for a bet size that allows me to have a small SPR if he calls, and also looks like I can get away from if villain shoves; giving him a chance to over play AK or JJ. Remember, we did back-raise, and not many people are capable of doing that with AA at micros. Usually its some guy going crazy w 8-8 or some random broadway/rag ace
I think, our image matter here, and stack size as well. If I see a fish backraise all in for his 72BB, I am usually thinking, that he is going crazy with 88 or a rag ace, as you say. Maybe he is on tilt, because I have been raising him to much (regular tables). However if its a regular doing it for 300BB, to me this action would scream aces. I might still get curious and call with KK, but anything else would be an easy fold.
I think the issue is SP in a multi way pot. With the known info I'd be thinking initially V10 may be squeezing but I'd still be putting him on something top 10% because he's probably got the same HUD stats I had against V8 thinking he's not raising light and would be trying to isolate. With that in mind I'd be thinking essentially the same time therefore I'd be wanting to do heads up with either player. I don't know if I'd shove because I'd want to keep one opponent in the hand to realize my EV.
Def a 3 bet preflop you dont want 3 players to see a flop there who are mega deep, i dont like the flat, but when villain 8 raises i think making it a dollar is fine then obviously call if he jams
If we are going to back-raise, its probably better to just ship it, like Hero did, to make it look like a wild bluff. If we go to a more normal 4-bet size, it will look extremely strong, and unless our opponents are totally braindead, they will put us on pretty much exactly aces. Personally though I would just take a more standard line here and 3-bet original raiser and then 5-bet, when BB comes over the top. I get the reasoning, but one player behind with a high 3-bet percentage is not enough for me to do something like this. Especially not in a Zoom game, where there is no history and dynamics. On a regular tables you can more easily find spots, where someone is clearly out of line, and where a play like this can have merits.
great video! I jut wanna to add, that probably best way in this situation, only at the PokerStars of course - is to make a cash-out of 81% of pot. When we speak about this deep, i think you need to do this 100%, because you have 18% chance to loose and this is a lot. How many times you will in situation like this when you have preflop all-in 600bb pot? Not so often, i think. And to escape situation like this and tilt, which can ruin your game or other negative stuff - just make a cash out. There is two reason: 1. You don't loose your initial stack 300bb+. 2. Yuo will win approx 80%*11,7$=9,36$ where net won is 9,36-(11.7/2)=9,36-5,85=3,51$. This is 175bb. Yeah it's not 300bb. But even you have 100bb preflop, you don't take so much bb as you could take from this hand. Also, if you make a cash-out you will win 175bb, if not, you (can) loose 300bb+possible(100%) 175bb. So difference is 475bb here and this is a lot.
still if you don't cash out and play this hand 10 times you win like 3000bb++ and lose 600bb so you're up 2400bb++ if you cash out you win only 1750bb. So in the long run it's more profitable to just get the full pot 8 of 10 times. But yeah if losing this gets you on massive tilt and you lose more because of that, then sure. Personally it would probably tilt me more to cash out and win the pot ;)
@@carlmswan4468yeah, i agree with you. But i wrote about frequency of this situation. In example, lets take situation like this. How many times you get this situation at this limit in about 150k hands. I personally don't think that so much.
I'd much prefer just betting about $1 instead of all-in preflop. Then I just go all in as soon as I see the flop and make them make the tough decision. The trick there is that then, if they do fold, you still earn a lot. The problem with the strategy used by the hero is that if they did fold preflop, you didn't really make enough with your aces. Although they probably wouldn't fold with their overpair as people are way too stingy about folding at these stakes, but if they did it could've been a way to win this pot.
Excellent educational video. Correct regarding Kings Preflop. Sometimes depends on the player, on that day. If he’s up x amount of BB on the day or playing multiple tables, the player might just fancy a gamble with Kings. Also worth remembering.... 18%! Is it that bad?? Well yes really but, think of this, your gonna win 18 times out of 100!! Is it that bad?? Probably - but - 18% is not 8% or 0.8%, it’s 18%. Poor aces - played perfectly (shipping vs 4 bet - is what it is) but happens in poker. What we need to remember in these instances - how many times have YOU hit a set against the rockets?? I know I have.... Great video Nathan and love your videos in general.
hey Blackrain. Great content as always. I'm a wininng zoom nl5 player 16bb/100. But i really do believe action flop theory for producing rake of RNG. You have a huge sample size of hand history. Can you please share the data of how many times did you lose with aa when opponent shooves all in?
in those cases, don't bluff them, don't try to get them to "give up", just value bet them big with your strong/premium hands :) if they're such calling station you could probably go for pretty think value too.
In NL2, when I have 2 stacks (4$) I leave the table, Im not playing NL5 thats why I do that. Do you think thats a correct action? En NL2, cuando tengo 2 stacks (4€) me salgo de la mesa, no estoy jugando NL5, por eso lo hago. Piensas que es correcta la acción?
Being 200 blinds deep changes the way you should play. But personally i'd like to play a little bit deeper, especially against fish so you can stack them for more than 100bbs. You saying you're not playing 5nl because you have a 4dollar stack, well you're still not. The blinds are still the same. But if you're not comfortable (yet) playing deep stack, then maybe leaving tables might be good for you (for now)
Es lo mejor, salirse y empezar de nuevo con 100bb, porque me ha pasado que consigo fullhouse mayor y el villano tiene el poker. Y obvio no voy a foldear el full 😂
Having a bigger stack means you can lose more with bad plays, but also win more with good plays. If you're fairly confident in your skills, especially when it comes to folding decent hands against shows of extreme strength, I'd keep playing. I had a somewhat related hand happen today, actually. I raised A4o on the button, and cbet half pot on a A5K flop. A bit bigger on an A turn, and on the A river (quads), I shoved for ~100bb into the ~29bb pot. Villain tanked a bit and then called with a king for the nut full house. Thanks to Blackrain for that play! I'd normally have bet maybe 16-20 bb there normally, and therefore gained an additional 75 bb in a single hand thanks to the overbet shove. How is that related? Well, mostly because it might've worked if we were deeper, too. Especially in cases where you have an unlikely, very strong hand vs a very strong, e.g. nut full house vs quads or nut flush vs straight flush.
While you have great odds with those aces the high chance of all your opponents folding preflop negates all-in as a viable strategy. Of course you want all their chips in the middle but you have a better chance of achieving that by not going all in. Also, if the flop comes up all spades or all hearts suddenly an aggressive opponent might convince you it was a great idea not to go all in. Naw all in pre-flop is a wasted opportunity and negates any skill advantage you might have. It also negates any positional advantage you might have. The only time to go all in pre-flop is when the opponent has the button or when you are probably not as skilled as your opponents. ..
honestly i think the shove is ok - making it 90 cents or a dollar is fine too , i just think that you will lose value from AK and AQ and TT/JJ/QQ by 4bet shoving so deep , a good player should fold everything there, i will not cal 300bb preflop with KK aganst solid/ tight player
@@BlackRain79Poker Is KK ever a fold 100BB deep? I had an NL5 zoom session recently where my kings ran into AA multiple times, basically everytime I got action with KK they had Aces. Can I ever get away from this to anyone other than a complete nit or at 100BBs is it just an automatic stack off?
That deep that sucks. Just shows players at the micros have no concept on how to play the game. It’s tilting when their bad play is rewarded but taking the results out we got the result we wanted. Got 200+bbs in as a huge favorite. Poker just sucks sometimes.
Lol - that’s what I willsay to myself going forward. And blame ‘Jokerstars’ (my fav poker site). Bad play or poker luck?? Aces vs Aces and loosing to Flush hurts more than this - or if he’d showed eights or twos and still hit his set! Poker.... love it!
The flat preflop is a no-no only because the logic used doesn’t apply at these stakes. The LAG’s 13% 3-bet is meaningless at these stakes. I would chalk that stat up to variance, not that said player is necessarily that aggressive. Also, how many hands does Hero have on this player? How many squeezes specifically has the villain done?
I think no matter what there is no right or wrong in the poker we had very tough opponent he will never fold KK also we will never fold AA so even if he just call this crazy opponent he will go as well all in after the flop so that is just a beat nothing to do just make a note and pay attention next time when you play with him/her
I’ve been playing PokerStars for a few weeks since it’s been back live in my state. I have noticed some pretty fishy hands going on. I have taken some of the worst beats imaginable. I literally played two hands of the exact same pocket cards. Exact same cards from my opponent and the exact same board. What are the odds of that ever happening in real life? I started to look into it and have found so many other people showing evidence that that website is rigged. What do you guys have to say about this? I was enjoying playing online but I cannot justify playing when it’s not truly random.
Hey Andrew, I know that poker can get really crazy sometimes, especially online poker with the speed of the deal. Many people think poker site [insert name here] is rigged because of this. I even made an entire video about it: ruclips.net/video/lgl_YasrfcQ/видео.html
Please allow me relate a story that might have changed my life. I am an old timer blackjack Pro. Casinos have been after us for 30 years. We knew we were on borrowed time. Retire or play something else. 15 years ago I was at a Freeroll Tourny at xxx site. 2 site pros joined us to promote the site. One is a Canadian the other has a PhD in Math. Thousands were watching. All sorts of actions on different tables. We witnessed many runner runner crazy hands. Having played with stats in blackjack for so long, anything can happen. .. until one hand. The pro set this guy up perfectly. The guy had, like 1% (could be 2 or 3) chance. We all witnessed "runner runner" and the pro lost. He said, "Oh I forgot this is xxx site ..." This guy is a mature, reserved, quiet, class act. When he speaks, you listen. That statement ended my potential career in online poker. Not too long after that the Full Tilt scandal happened. Had I stayed with Poker I would have had money in Full Tilt for sure. I just went back to blackjack. The game was EASY back then. I might have missed out on golden opportunities. From a business perspective, if they change the odds even in 1% of the time. Over a million hands, 10,000 newbies will win against all odds. Newbies tell newbies. It is good for business. 99% of the time, good players still win with good hands. Everybody is happy.
Even with a 4bet Villain8 is either 5betting or flatting. And then in the latter case the money is going in on the flop. So you still achieve the 82% equity and get unlucky on the river. Gg and move on.
![Quando Rondo - Grow Up [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8zFnCg3BO4Q/mqdefault.jpg)
How do you play pocket AA? Also, check out my latest video on how to make $1000 a month playing poker: ruclips.net/video/HAfFrsrFPFc/видео.html
From my experience, guys who play a decent 18/14 strategy don't normally ship three stacks with KK, but I guess the initial call from hero might have triggered him to rule out AA from hero's range. There's no other way to explain it. He might have folded if hero just 3-bet like in a normal situation and after villain 4-bet and hero 5-bet shipped he probably would have got the message and folded. So the tricky call might have done the job here.
Ya it's strange to see a reg call off that much but maybe there was some dynamic at play here that Evgeny can comment on. Also though, this is NL2, sometimes they just don't realize that it is 300bb.
i think that we should not play deep in zoom tables , because of the varianze and we cant recover oue money from the fish that have batbeat on us , so we i am more the 150bb in zoom i leave the table and reset my stack
In my opinion, at nl2 is a very bad idea to just call with AA, because I don't want to get to the flop with 3 or 4 guys, because when the flop comes we will loose at the end a lot of the times, specially if there are fishes who call with mid-pairs or ridiculous gut-shots and end up hitting their lucky card, so for me, always 3bet premium hands. That being said, the rest of the hand is well played, a painful bad beat. Great Hand review Nathan.
I agree, 3betting pre is better at NL2, thanks for your thoughts Andres!
I was just thinking, from the villain's POV, would *anyone* have folded the KK when Hero shoves like this? Or am i insane? What hand is he doing this with - JJ, QQ, AK (having KK is possible but unlikely). At this level, if i have KK, i'm putting him on exactly what he has and know i have approx 20% chance. Would i be crazy to fold?
I know he could turn up with rubbish, but would anyone ship with rubbish? Just thinking out loud.
Edit: i wrote this before the end and just listened to Nathan saying to fold KK. Relieved to not be a mad man. Thanks for the content, Nathan
in this exact spot, i think the money was going in regardless of whether we made a standard 4 bet or shipped.
That being said, I still would have preferred a 4-bet. I probably would have went to approx 1.20. I would have been looking for a bet size that allows me to have a small SPR if he calls, and also looks like I can get away from if villain shoves; giving him a chance to over play AK or JJ. Remember, we did back-raise, and not many people are capable of doing that with AA at micros. Usually its some guy going crazy w 8-8 or some random broadway/rag ace
I think, our image matter here, and stack size as well. If I see a fish backraise all in for his 72BB, I am usually thinking, that he is going crazy with 88 or a rag ace, as you say. Maybe he is on tilt, because I have been raising him to much (regular tables). However if its a regular doing it for 300BB, to me this action would scream aces. I might still get curious and call with KK, but anything else would be an easy fold.
Your videos are really helpful. We want more of you.
Thank you saswat! I will try to put out more videos in 2020. Thank you for watching :)
I think the issue is SP in a multi way pot. With the known info I'd be thinking initially V10 may be squeezing but I'd still be putting him on something top 10% because he's probably got the same HUD stats I had against V8 thinking he's not raising light and would be trying to isolate. With that in mind I'd be thinking essentially the same time therefore I'd be wanting to do heads up with either player. I don't know if I'd shove because I'd want to keep one opponent in the hand to realize my EV.
Def a 3 bet preflop you dont want 3 players to see a flop there who are mega deep, i dont like the flat, but when villain 8 raises i think making it a dollar is fine then obviously call if he jams
Good points all around, thanks for your feedback!
If we are going to back-raise, its probably better to just ship it, like Hero did, to make it look like a wild bluff. If we go to a more normal 4-bet size, it will look extremely strong, and unless our opponents are totally braindead, they will put us on pretty much exactly aces. Personally though I would just take a more standard line here and 3-bet original raiser and then 5-bet, when BB comes over the top.
I get the reasoning, but one player behind with a high 3-bet percentage is not enough for me to do something like this. Especially not in a Zoom game, where there is no history and dynamics. On a regular tables you can more easily find spots, where someone is clearly out of line, and where a play like this can have merits.
great video!
I jut wanna to add, that probably best way in this situation, only at the PokerStars of course - is to make a cash-out of 81% of pot. When we speak about this deep, i think you need to do this 100%, because you have 18% chance to loose and this is a lot. How many times you will in situation like this when you have preflop all-in 600bb pot? Not so often, i think. And to escape situation like this and tilt, which can ruin your game or other negative stuff - just make a cash out. There is two reason: 1. You don't loose your initial stack 300bb+. 2. Yuo will win approx 80%*11,7$=9,36$ where net won is 9,36-(11.7/2)=9,36-5,85=3,51$. This is 175bb. Yeah it's not 300bb. But even you have 100bb preflop, you don't take so much bb as you could take from this hand. Also, if you make a cash-out you will win 175bb, if not, you (can) loose 300bb+possible(100%) 175bb. So difference is 475bb here and this is a lot.
Lol what?
still if you don't cash out and play this hand 10 times you win like 3000bb++ and lose 600bb so you're up 2400bb++ if you cash out you win only 1750bb. So in the long run it's more profitable to just get the full pot 8 of 10 times. But yeah if losing this gets you on massive tilt and you lose more because of that, then sure. Personally it would probably tilt me more to cash out and win the pot ;)
@@carlmswan4468yeah, i agree with you. But i wrote about frequency of this situation. In example, lets take situation like this. How many times you get this situation at this limit in about 150k hands. I personally don't think that so much.
I'd much prefer just betting about $1 instead of all-in preflop. Then I just go all in as soon as I see the flop and make them make the tough decision. The trick there is that then, if they do fold, you still earn a lot. The problem with the strategy used by the hero is that if they did fold preflop, you didn't really make enough with your aces. Although they probably wouldn't fold with their overpair as people are way too stingy about folding at these stakes, but if they did it could've been a way to win this pot.
Excellent educational video. Correct regarding Kings Preflop. Sometimes depends on the player, on that day. If he’s up x amount of BB on the day or playing multiple tables, the player might just fancy a gamble with Kings.
Also worth remembering.... 18%! Is it that bad?? Well yes really but, think of this, your gonna win 18 times out of 100!! Is it that bad?? Probably - but - 18% is not 8% or 0.8%, it’s 18%.
Poor aces - played perfectly (shipping vs 4 bet - is what it is) but happens in poker.
What we need to remember in these instances - how many times have YOU hit a set against the rockets?? I know I have....
Great video Nathan and love your videos in general.
Thanks for watching Yiannis and for your comments as well.
hey Blackrain. Great content as always. I'm a wininng zoom nl5 player 16bb/100. But i really do believe action flop theory for producing rake of RNG. You have a huge sample size of hand history. Can you please share the data of how many times did you lose with aa when opponent shooves all in?
Thanks Ethan glad my videos help you! I have published my database before in the past on my blog. Maybe I will again in the future.
hi i am having problem with my games that turkish player call any raise any flop they dont give up what can i do
in those cases, don't bluff them, don't try to get them to "give up", just value bet them big with your strong/premium hands :) if they're such calling station you could probably go for pretty think value too.
In NL2, when I have 2 stacks (4$) I leave the table, Im not playing NL5 thats why I do that. Do you think thats a correct action?
En NL2, cuando tengo 2 stacks (4€) me salgo de la mesa, no estoy jugando NL5, por eso lo hago. Piensas que es correcta la acción?
Being 200 blinds deep changes the way you should play. But personally i'd like to play a little bit deeper, especially against fish so you can stack them for more than 100bbs. You saying you're not playing 5nl because you have a 4dollar stack, well you're still not. The blinds are still the same. But if you're not comfortable (yet) playing deep stack, then maybe leaving tables might be good for you (for now)
Es lo mejor, salirse y empezar de nuevo con 100bb, porque me ha pasado que consigo fullhouse mayor y el villano tiene el poker. Y obvio no voy a foldear el full 😂
Having a bigger stack means you can lose more with bad plays, but also win more with good plays. If you're fairly confident in your skills, especially when it comes to folding decent hands against shows of extreme strength, I'd keep playing.
I had a somewhat related hand happen today, actually. I raised A4o on the button, and cbet half pot on a A5K flop. A bit bigger on an A turn, and on the A river (quads), I shoved for ~100bb into the ~29bb pot. Villain tanked a bit and then called with a king for the nut full house.
Thanks to Blackrain for that play! I'd normally have bet maybe 16-20 bb there normally, and therefore gained an additional 75 bb in a single hand thanks to the overbet shove.
How is that related? Well, mostly because it might've worked if we were deeper, too. Especially in cases where you have an unlikely, very strong hand vs a very strong, e.g. nut full house vs quads or nut flush vs straight flush.
Btw, guys, what do you think about just calling 3-bet with AA or KK on BTN and CO vs BB and SB?
I don't really like flatting the 3-bet this deep at NL2 with another player involved as well. I think 4-betting is the far superior option here.
if you re-raise 95% of players fold this days.
While you have great odds with those aces the high chance of all your opponents folding preflop negates all-in as a viable strategy. Of course you want all their chips in the middle but you have a better chance of achieving that by not going all in. Also, if the flop comes up all spades or all hearts suddenly an aggressive opponent might convince you it was a great idea not to go all in.
Naw all in pre-flop is a wasted opportunity and negates any skill advantage you might have. It also negates any positional advantage you might have. The only time to go all in pre-flop is when the opponent has the button or when you are probably not as skilled as your opponents.
..
Happy to help, thanks for watching my poker videos!
Nice hand, I would play it the same!
Agreed, thanks for the input OR!
Hero hand is so well hidden that "all in" is the best play preflop IMO
Nice hand explanation Nate !
Haha thanks Paul!
Just seeing this tilts me
Really though, reminds me of the first time playing deep live high stakes and reaching the same outcome. 🤦♂️ Welp. Just 1 stack. 🤷♂️
honestly i think the shove is ok - making it 90 cents or a dollar is fine too , i just think that you will lose value from AK and AQ and TT/JJ/QQ by 4bet shoving so deep , a good player should fold everything there, i will not cal 300bb preflop with KK aganst solid/ tight player
I agree with all your points. Thanks for watching!
@@BlackRain79Poker Is KK ever a fold 100BB deep? I had an NL5 zoom session recently where my kings ran into AA multiple times, basically everytime I got action with KK they had Aces. Can I ever get away from this to anyone other than a complete nit or at 100BBs is it just an automatic stack off?
That deep that sucks. Just shows players at the micros have no concept on how to play the game. It’s tilting when their bad play is rewarded but taking the results out we got the result we wanted. Got 200+bbs in as a huge favorite. Poker just sucks sometimes.
Well put lozgod.
preflop game was so bad stars punished him XD
Haha, thanks for the feedback!
Lol - that’s what I willsay to myself going forward.
And blame ‘Jokerstars’ (my fav poker site).
Bad play or poker luck??
Aces vs Aces and loosing to Flush hurts more than this - or if he’d showed eights or twos and still hit his set! Poker.... love it!
The flat preflop is a no-no only because the logic used doesn’t apply at these stakes. The LAG’s 13% 3-bet is meaningless at these stakes. I would chalk that stat up to variance, not that said player is necessarily that aggressive. Also, how many hands does Hero have on this player? How many squeezes specifically has the villain done?
Good points J TC, not sure how much I love the initial flat preflop as well. It is a bit of a stretch at these stakes.
I think no matter what there is no right or wrong in the poker we had very tough opponent he will never fold KK also we will never fold AA so even if he just call this crazy opponent he will go as well all in after the flop so that is just a beat nothing to do just make a note and pay attention next time when you play with him/her
Thanks for your thoughts on this hand Kiril!
I’ve been playing PokerStars for a few weeks since it’s been back live in my state. I have noticed some pretty fishy hands going on. I have taken some of the worst beats imaginable. I literally played two hands of the exact same pocket cards. Exact same cards from my opponent and the exact same board. What are the odds of that ever happening in real life? I started to look into it and have found so many other people showing evidence that that website is rigged. What do you guys have to say about this? I was enjoying playing online but I cannot justify playing when it’s not truly random.
Hey Andrew, I know that poker can get really crazy sometimes, especially online poker with the speed of the deal. Many people think poker site [insert name here] is rigged because of this. I even made an entire video about it: ruclips.net/video/lgl_YasrfcQ/видео.html
Please allow me relate a story that might have changed my life.
I am an old timer blackjack Pro. Casinos have been after us for 30 years. We knew we were on borrowed time. Retire or play something else.
15 years ago I was at a Freeroll Tourny at xxx site. 2 site pros joined us to promote the site. One is a Canadian the other has a PhD in Math. Thousands were watching. All sorts of actions on different tables. We witnessed many runner runner crazy hands. Having played with stats in blackjack for so long, anything can happen. .. until one hand.
The pro set this guy up perfectly. The guy had, like 1% (could be 2 or 3) chance. We all witnessed "runner runner" and the pro lost. He said, "Oh I forgot this is xxx site ..." This guy is a mature, reserved, quiet, class act. When he speaks, you listen.
That statement ended my potential career in online poker. Not too long after that the Full Tilt scandal happened. Had I stayed with Poker I would have had money in Full Tilt for sure. I just went back to blackjack. The game was EASY back then. I might have missed out on golden opportunities.
From a business perspective, if they change the odds even in 1% of the time. Over a million hands, 10,000 newbies will win against all odds. Newbies tell newbies. It is good for business. 99% of the time, good players still win with good hands. Everybody is happy.
Omg you do rumble on wtk get to it
Whats a rumble?
Even with a 4bet Villain8 is either 5betting or flatting. And then in the latter case the money is going in on the flop. So you still achieve the 82% equity and get unlucky on the river. Gg and move on.
the play is obvious in this spot. fold those aces. :D hahaha
I dont bluff, i only bet with the nuts - thats my strategy. gg :)
Haha when in the postlezone!
@@BlackRain79Poker yep, when
pastlezone- god mode is activated everything is so easy :)
That is why I always "cash out" and get 80% of the stack guaranteed
You play bad, That's why you don't play high levels
Ok! lol
am i reading it correct? there's $3 stacks? 😂😂😂😂 why waste ur time? this is dumb! deep stacked at $2? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 why waste ur time?
What a weird comment. Yes this is deep stacked NL2??? lol