The chemical history of a candle - with David Ricketts

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 11 янв 2025
  • Discover the chemistry of a simple candle in this demo-packed tribute to Michael Faraday's famous 1861 lecture.
    Join this channel to get access to perks:
    / @theroyalinstitution
    Subscribe for regular science videos: bit.ly/RiSubscRibe
    This lecture was recorded at the Ri on 19 December 2024. Join the Ri Demo team and Innovator in Residence David Ricketts, as they reimagine the Faraday classic Christmas Lecture - A chemical History of the candle.
    Originally delivered by Faraday in a series of 6 lectures, the chemical history was the most popular Christmas lecture Faraday gave, with over 700 people in attendance when he last delivered it in 1861.
    The RI demo team takes a modern interpretation of Faraday's original lecture and demonstration, to deliver Faradays' original series into a single lecture. They have curated an amazing array of demos to teach the physics and chemistry of the simple candle, of the physical world and life.
    This one-night-only performance combined the historical feel and vibe of the Ri as it was in 1861 with modern science concepts and new demonstrations. This lecture includes many loud noises, bright lights and surprises...oh, and several very large fires!
    --
    Prof David Ricketts is the Innovator in Resdience at the Ri and an Innovation Fellow in the Technology and Entrepreneurship Centre at Harvard University. He works with organisations around the globe, such as Mastercard, Ubisoft, Disney, General Motors, Dell and Ferarri to accelerate innovation.
    David is also an accomplished academic, having his work appear twice in Nature as well as other distinguished publications and books. He is recipient of the National Science Foundation (US) CAREER award and the DARPA Young Faculty Award for his work on nano-electromagnetic devices. His innovations include a re-programmable, self-assembling matter, an American football tracking for sports visualisation with Disney/ESPN, and an advanced wireless power systems for next-generation cars with General Motors Research.
    --
    The Ri is on Twitter: / ri_science
    and Facebook: / royalinstitution
    and TikTok: / ri_science
    Listen to the Ri podcast: podcasters.spo...
    Donate to the RI and help us bring you more lectures: www.rigb.org/s...
    Our editorial policy: www.rigb.org/e...
    Subscribe for the latest science videos: bit.ly/RiNewsle...
    Product links on this page may be affiliate links which means it won't cost you any extra but we may earn a small commission if you decide to purchase through the link.

Комментарии • 89

  • @Ray_of_Light62
    @Ray_of_Light62 18 дней назад +12

    Merry Christmas to everyone!
    Thank you Royal Institution for repeating Prof. Faraday lecture on the candle, as it is a very bright presentation.
    Greetings,
    Anthony

  • @dannicatzer305
    @dannicatzer305 18 дней назад +17

    Used to watch this every year when I was a kid... Still feel a great nostalgia for the christmas lecture..

    • @davidevans3227
      @davidevans3227 16 дней назад

      is this Christmas lecture?
      i think that's to come in the bbc..
      end of this week?

  • @mattschultzy671
    @mattschultzy671 18 дней назад +9

    3 minutes in and I love it already! Wonderful!

  • @Pamudder
    @Pamudder 16 дней назад +2

    A simple yet glorious demonstration, showing the genius of Michael Faraday from 160 years ago.

  • @rickardandreasson5095
    @rickardandreasson5095 16 дней назад +1

    I love to watch RI lectures. Really interesting stuff. And you can learn a lot

  • @littlec916
    @littlec916 17 дней назад +6

    This guy, including his name, is right out of the Harry Potter universe. Professor Rickets. What a name.

  • @AlanCanon2222
    @AlanCanon2222 18 дней назад +3

    Loved reading the original lecture by Faraday himself!

  • @Thisandthat8908
    @Thisandthat8908 17 дней назад +3

    in case you're wondering: it is now considered less damaging to old books not wearing gloves. Even really old ones. So it's correct what they do there.

    • @RFC3514
      @RFC3514 12 дней назад +1

      It's not really a matter of being "less damaging"; cotton gloves don't cause any damage. It's just that the damage caused by (clean) fingers is practically zero, and gloves reduce sensitivity and make it more likely that people will accidentally rip the edges of the pages.

    • @jessiepooch
      @jessiepooch 12 дней назад

      So many whiners.

  • @brittmurray9818
    @brittmurray9818 14 дней назад

    What a wonderful idea. Attending a Royal Institution Christmas lecture is now on my bucket list!

  • @effychase62
    @effychase62 16 дней назад

    Good stuff all the way through.

  • @n.b.p.davenport7066
    @n.b.p.davenport7066 18 дней назад +3

    In rule Arizona I had a Seville refrigerator that ran off of propane, with fire😮

    • @arthuroldale-ki2ev
      @arthuroldale-ki2ev 13 дней назад

      Yes , I had a Calor gas fridge back in the 1960s and it was old then .

  • @peter-radiantpipes2800
    @peter-radiantpipes2800 18 дней назад +1

    Illuminating

  • @Norfolk250
    @Norfolk250 13 дней назад

    I was hoping for one of those relighting candles

  • @n.b.p.davenport7066
    @n.b.p.davenport7066 18 дней назад

    I know I just started watching this and poking fun at it, play wonder if he's going to get into the modern candles with the glass and carbon candle wicks

  • @DavisNgugi-j7y
    @DavisNgugi-j7y 17 дней назад +1

    It's a good science demonstration of how a candle burns👍👏...buh I would like 2 know what did he deep the melted candle in to 😁...after all those yrs from Michael Faraday till now it remains a good lecture😏👏👍

  • @notquitecopacetic
    @notquitecopacetic 6 дней назад +1

    wax vapor, i'll be damned, only took me half a century to learn

  • @davidevans3227
    @davidevans3227 16 дней назад +1

    why isn't this on the bbc?
    like it used to..??
    enjoying the language 🙂 x
    thankyou for sharing this ..
    apologies, it is on the bbc still..

    • @brinh123
      @brinh123 12 дней назад +1

      You're right that they are on BBC - This isn't the Ri Christmas Lectures you were thinking of, that is on BBC4 and presented by Dr Chris van Tulleken. This is just another lecture the Ri put on, as they do other lectures all year. - sorry, didn't see all your comment until after I'd posted as it was hidden under the "Show more"

  • @tinderboxcreations
    @tinderboxcreations 15 дней назад +2

    This begins like a Reggie Watts show.

  • @n.b.p.davenport7066
    @n.b.p.davenport7066 18 дней назад +1

    Mommy said don't play with matches I'm going to burn the house down😢

  • @n.b.p.davenport7066
    @n.b.p.davenport7066 18 дней назад

    I was watching One video where the guy was making candles out of sugar, Burns super bright

  • @XAirForcedotcom
    @XAirForcedotcom 17 дней назад +1

    Oh man, I thought it was gonna introduce the fusion candle : )

    • @XAirForcedotcom
      @XAirForcedotcom 17 дней назад

      Oh well, maybe next Christmas

    • @XAirForcedotcom
      @XAirForcedotcom 17 дней назад

      I used to work in one of Faraday’s cages. He will be big trouble if anyone finds out that I was caged like that. The missile field so I could fix communications equipment without anyone being able to detect the admissions because I had the equipment open.

    • @XAirForcedotcom
      @XAirForcedotcom 17 дней назад

      My intro-induction to Faraday was in basic electronics. 😂

    • @RFC3514
      @RFC3514 12 дней назад +1

      That's still 20 years away.

  • @topos100
    @topos100 17 дней назад

    For anyone who wants a different point of view...pls read Dr. Philip S. Callahan..."Tuning into Nature"

    • @PBeringer
      @PBeringer 14 дней назад +1

      A "different point of view" on science sounds highly suspicious. :/
      EDIT: Well, at first glance, it doesn't _seeeeem_ to be, but how it's a "different point of view" when it's a book about insects seeing in infrared (among other things), I have no idea; it doesn't appear to be the slightest bit relevant.

  • @quill444
    @quill444 14 дней назад +2

    _The constant clapping everytime someone nears or exits the desk gets thoroughly tedious after a while._ 👋🏻👋🏻👋🏻👋🏻👋🏻👋🏻 - j q t -

  • @TheChipmunk2008
    @TheChipmunk2008 2 дня назад

    welcome to future bryson :)

  • @sstoharczyk4163
    @sstoharczyk4163 15 дней назад

    23:23 ...?

  • @chanpol321
    @chanpol321 18 дней назад

    X-ray detector the same principle?

  • @AkPK369
    @AkPK369 12 дней назад

    Description saying simple candle demo this type of simple posible only for NileRed youtuber

  • @AGAZOOLovesTrains
    @AGAZOOLovesTrains 10 дней назад

    I WAS THE ONE WHO SAID PETROL

  • @RFC3514
    @RFC3514 12 дней назад +2

    17:15 - This is *not* true and it's misleading to children trying to understand the physical phenomenon taking place here. Heat does *not* "cause air to rise above". Heat has no concept of direction.
    What's happening is that heat reduces the _density_ of the air, and the (colder, denser) _surrounding_ air gets pulled _down_ by gravity, displacing the hot air (which is then forced to rise). It's not rising because it's *hotter,* it's rising because it's *lighter* than the cold(er) air around it, which is being pulled down by gravity. It's rising for the same reason that air bubbles rise in water. Without gravity, the heat (and the hot air) would spread evenly in every direction.

    • @Swingingbells
      @Swingingbells 12 дней назад +2

      Wittgenstein's ladder, bro.
      Also, your explanation doesn't add anything. It's just a more verbose way of restating our observation of the phenomena.
      It's unnecessarily pedantic to specify that it only occurs under the conditions of (Earth's) gravity.

    • @RFC3514
      @RFC3514 10 дней назад +2

      My post is an actual _explanation,_ not just a (misleading) _observation._
      In fact, it also explains the _following_ experiment, where they used a suction pump to change the direction of the flame. If _heat_ truly did "rise above", then the suction wouldn't make any difference, because "up" would still be "up". What the suction pump is doing is making the pressure on one side of the flame even lower, thus causing the hot air to get pushed into it by air pressure on every _other_ side, and carrying the flame with it.
      These are supposed to be *_science_* lectures, not "give a vague description of what you see and suggest some alternative laws of physics".

    • @wiegix
      @wiegix 3 дня назад

      @@RFC3514 yours is uneeded word soup. What they did was perfect and simple. I say it as a viewer.

  • @DonaldSleightholme
    @DonaldSleightholme 17 дней назад

    candle light might work on a solar panel 🕯️🙇‍♂️

    • @woundedone
      @woundedone 14 дней назад +1

      It does. The thing is you won't really get much energy out of a candle that way, it's better to just use the candle to boil some water, then run the steam through a turbine/ dynamo.

  • @Andrew.Centanni
    @Andrew.Centanni 16 дней назад +1

    If he hasn't already, Tom should see an ENT; his breathing sounds very labored.
    (Otherwise fun lecture!)

  • @JusticeAlways
    @JusticeAlways 18 дней назад

    Rocket scientists. 😅
    (I love hearing that British accent)

    • @PBeringer
      @PBeringer 14 дней назад

      The world's a fascinating place; try leaving the county one day ... one day ... maybe. Unless something strange happens (I'm only ten minutes in), or you're referring to one of the assistants, he's a Yank.

  • @opperhoofdgeilebizon
    @opperhoofdgeilebizon 17 дней назад +4

    What a great lecture, even for a 40 years old kid 😁

  • @aloluk
    @aloluk 8 дней назад

    Ah stop saying twenty point twenty!!!!!! Its twenty point two! Or is it twenty point two million?

  • @Sumit-i8p
    @Sumit-i8p 18 дней назад

    More Oxygen🎉

  • @lionelfischer8240
    @lionelfischer8240 18 дней назад

    It's so easy to test water with copper II salts becoming blue, rather than dangerous and expensive sodium. OK for children it's more spectacular.

  • @Czechbound
    @Czechbound 18 дней назад +26

    Very poor camera work and editing. Not like RI lectures of old. Director and producers : please rewatch the shows from 20 years ago to see how it's done.

    • @festivitycat
      @festivitycat 18 дней назад +11

      It did feel like some of the demo team and film crew were a little underprepared. Prof Ricketts was superb though.
      Also worth noting this is an RI in-house production rather than a big-bucks BBC Christmas Lecture.

    • @justinpyle3415
      @justinpyle3415 18 дней назад

      Look at their view count.
      Its their own fault for pretending gender equity has anything to do with effective scientific progress

    • @fra8156
      @fra8156 18 дней назад +2

      I was writing the same, then I saw your perfect comment. The editing is done by someone that doesn't care about what is showed at RI....and that's a pity!

    • @Gravitational234
      @Gravitational234 18 дней назад

      Very poor level of donation with your whinge

    • @Gravitational234
      @Gravitational234 18 дней назад +10

      @@fra8156 The RI can't afford a dedicated production team because people like you spend too much time complaining about something you got for free

  • @Ranjanapati07
    @Ranjanapati07 18 дней назад

    Take a break David

  • @Cumbriman
    @Cumbriman 11 дней назад

    I think they should have given them all a beta blocker beforehand, they're all hyperventilating and shaking

  • @Serezin234
    @Serezin234 17 дней назад +3

    I think in Faradays times people were really impressed by this lecture but times have changed a little bit dont you think?

    • @noahwinslow2692
      @noahwinslow2692 17 дней назад

      Yes I agree, but science is timeless! Even the most simple of things can be explored in more ways that we could ever imagine !

    • @arthuroldale-ki2ev
      @arthuroldale-ki2ev 13 дней назад

      I would much rather live in his time , an exiting time .

  • @n.b.p.davenport7066
    @n.b.p.davenport7066 18 дней назад +3

    Who doesn't know anything about candles those people in the audience didn't go to school, I hope they didn't pay to get in there to watch this. My wife said this is close to a nuclear reaction😂

  • @Slarti
    @Slarti 13 дней назад

    26:05 "that is why the sun is the colour it is, because of the extremely high temperature that it burns at"
    Seriously?
    This whole lecture is a complete sh!tshow when it comes to the demos and all the individuals involved, but that one statement just takes the biscuit!

  • @barnwobble
    @barnwobble 18 дней назад +1

    How does the wish work when ye blow them out though?

  • @EclecticBuddha
    @EclecticBuddha 18 дней назад +1

    This is how children in the UK will learn what candles are after they're banned to prevent people being lit on fire in the subway.

  • @JohnSmith-s6n5d
    @JohnSmith-s6n5d 17 дней назад

    Should have been wearing cotton gloves instead of pawing through the book barehanded.

  • @RohanShekharSawant
    @RohanShekharSawant 19 дней назад +1

    First Comment

    • @kevinbush4300
      @kevinbush4300 19 дней назад +3

      Well done!!
      Immensely constructive!

    • @Romamb
      @Romamb 18 дней назад +2

      Here...have a medal to show your family 🥇

    • @Safetytrousers
      @Safetytrousers 18 дней назад +1

      Congratulations, such a magnificent achievement. And so creatively achieved.

  • @timothy8426
    @timothy8426 18 дней назад

    Really, a candle? Royal candles institute of chemistry?

  • @asmaSalman-ju7cx
    @asmaSalman-ju7cx 19 дней назад

    Make me feel famous pls 😁