Top 10 Common Driving Law Myths
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 июн 2024
- Get Exclusive NordVPN deal here ➼ nordvpn.com/ashleyneal It's risk-free with Nord's 30-day money-back guarantee! 👊
My top 10 common driving law myths explained.
Dash Camera Affiliate Links.
Car - Viofo - viofouk.co.uk/ashleyv10f01621...
Motorcycle - Innov - innovv.co.uk/ashley1nn0v1370307/
Motorcycle, Bicycle and Equestrian - Techalogic - techalogic.co.uk/ashleyt3ck41...
Social Media
www.ashleyneal.com
/ ashleynealdrivinginstr...
ashleysanalysis@gmail.com
Amazon Links
Sony a6400 Camera - amzn.to/2xVCrn0
Sony A7C Camera - amzn.to/3JUvUIa
Tascam DR-10L Microphone - amzn.to/3M8P0fd
Sony FDR X3000 Action Camera - amzn.to/2YVoPDh
#driving #top10 #education
![DDG & Blueface - Top ft. Swae Lee [Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/p2wIDXar9ns/mqdefault.jpg)
The littering one reminds me of an incident years ago. A friends son parked his pick up in a bus stop (with thick yellow line) and came out to find a parking ticket on his windscreen. He ripped it off and threw it on the ground. As he did this a street warden was walking past who promptly handed him a fine for littering. I thought this was hilarious as he was one of those people that thought he was above the law. I
That's hilarious, as if removing a ticket from the car would get rid of it, nope. It just gave him more problems 😅
What about the speed cameras that do you for no belt no tax and being on the phone 😄😂😅
@@marklittler784
We need more of them. In fact, all cameras should be converted to these and replace fixed speed cameras with average speed camera pairs.
He's been had. If he just picked it up he wouldn't have been fined!
@@ianl1052 Yeah look how calm and tranquil smart motorways are in rush hour.
#4 - Littering. This also includes throwing cigarette butts out the window, which appears to be something smokers seem to ignore/not realise.
I was just about to put that exact same thing.
This is my pet hate too.
@@Ian_Livesey they need educating - I'm sure the message will filter through (no pun intended)
They’ll decompose after 6 billion years mate, I wouldn’t worry about it
This will please you. I once had a really, really bad day at work so I had a cig on the way home. My ashtray was full so I threw the butt out of the window. A few days later I received a £40 fine!!! :-D
Hopefully we'll be smoking free in the UK soon
Something my dad said to me years ago. If you have a drink, leave the car, even if you have to leave it at the pub, resturant etc. Get a taxi. It'll cost less than £20 (then). Look at it this way, if you get caught (or worse) and thrown in a police cell overnight but then someone came to your cell and said "give me £20 and ill make all this go away", you'd give them £40...
Myth #1 - People assume if you're hit from behind the other person is "automatically" deamed at fault. Reality is if a person genuinely drives dangerously and creates that situation, they can and will get prosecuted
You could pull-out dangerously and late and get hit in the back.
It's the ability to prove which is the issue. This happened to my wife where a Post Office van reversed into her. The driver denied it and the Post Office wouldn't have any of it. But my wife was determined and actually went knocking on doors at the location of the incident. Fortunately a lady in one of the houses confirmed she was reversed into and was willing to be interviewed by someone from the insurers. Increasingly, the burden of proof is on the individual as insurance companies are simply not prepared to do the leg work as it costs money. We now have dash cams on our cars for this very reason
It’s insurance companies you need to convince
@@winterbas8927 I’ve had a dash cam on my car for around 4 years now. I’ve never had an accident but I’ve caught a lot of dodgy stuff on it. I wouldn’t ever drive without one now as I know from others experience that it can come in very handy!
@@bpenny4352easy if they reverse into you
8:07
Further on this point: There are actually 2 main drink drive offences.
You can either be done for driving whilst over the prescribed limit (as would be tested by a breathalyser) or you can be done for driving whilst unfit through drink. If the police decide that alcohol is affecting your ability to drive, even if you're well below the limit, you can still be lifted.
Yes although that would be quite rare, the "whilst unfit" offence is usually reserved for if drugs are suspected or if you are so drunk you physically cannot provide a roadside breath test - or if one is not needed to create the reasonable suspicion - also it covers any drugs such as prescription drugs i.e you have taken medication and driven after strictly being told not to by a doctor
Yes driving while unfit is often overlooked. Some people can be quite pissed off 1 pint. You're under but definitely in no fit state to drive
With all the laws and road rules, if police have reasonable basis, they can charge a "within the limits" driver with an offence if circumstances at the time cause the driver to be unfit or unable to safely control a vehicle. This also means a driver could get in trouble for their speed, even if well under the limit, for example.
@Tosspot1305 - I very rarely drink, maybe once a year.
It takes very little to get me drunk.
Although I'd more than likely be under the limit even after just one drink I wouldn't be in a fit state to drive.
..
Do you know Jesus Christ can set you free from sins and save you from hell today
Jesus Christ is the only hope in this world no other gods will lead you to heaven
There is no security or hope with out Jesus Christ in this world come and repent of all sins today
Today is the day of salvation come to the loving savior Today repent and do not go to hell
Come to Jesus Christ today
Jesus Christ is only way to heaven
Repent and follow him today seek his heart Jesus Christ can fill the emptiness he can fill the void
Heaven and hell is real cone to the loving savior today
Today is the day of salvation tomorrow might be to late come to the loving savior today
Romans 6.23
For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
John 3:16-21
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
Mark 1.15
15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.
2 Peter 3:9
The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Hebrews 11:6
6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
Jesus
I believe that if every driver watched one of your videos a month, our roads would be safer.
Keep it up, it chills me out at least.
if they watched one video a month and weren't allowed to drive until they'd watched them all, the roads would be even safer still
Do you know Jesus Christ can set you free from sins and save you from hell today
Jesus Christ is the only hope in this world no other gods will lead you to heaven
There is no security or hope with out Jesus Christ in this world come and repent of all sins today
Today is the day of salvation come to the loving savior Today repent and do not go to hell
Come to Jesus Christ today
Jesus Christ is only way to heaven
Repent and follow him today seek his heart Jesus Christ can fill the emptiness he can fill the void
Heaven and hell is real cone to the loving savior today
Today is the day of salvation tomorrow might be to late come to the loving savior today
Romans 6.23
For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
John 3:16-21
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
Mark 1.15
15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.
2 Peter 3:9
The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Hebrews 11:6
6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
Jesus
The question of picking up a stranger to teach a lesson on the way home sounds likely to get you in trouble in court to me. I suspect there would be a question about which activity is the primary reason for the charge. Does the charge match other lessons you give? Was the lesson arranged in the same way as other lessons you give? Is the passenger going to receive any award or test on the knowledge imparted? Is the passenger sober enough to actually benefit from the lesson?
You might be able to argue it, but I think the fact that it doesn't feel clear-cut is an indicator that it's probably not a good idea.
All true. However I doubt this is policed and unless grassed, reckon you could get away with this forever.
I agree, it doesn't seem to be a good idea. You may be able to argue that the person in question agreed to all the conditions, but the question I would have is: was that person actually sober enough to make that decision, as what seems like a good idea when you're drunk may not be when you sober up.
If Ashley's insurance policy does not *specifically exclude 'plying for hire''* I guess he is covered. Were he involved in an RTC while conducting the ad-hoc lesson the Insurance Company would soon close the loophole.
OTOH, No Taxi driver wants to pick up unruly drunks who may be a nuisance or throw up in the car! Many years ago, before mobile 'phones, a colleague who was a heavy drinker was trying, late at night, to find a taxi to take him 18 miles up the A34 from Newbury to his home. The only available taxi would not take him so he set off to walk home (~6 hrs?). After a mile or two he was apprehended by a Police Patrol Car. The Police said "Don't worry mate, we'll get you a taxi". ten minutes later the Taxi turned up, the same one that had refuse his fare and he got home safely.
I suspect most (if not all) driving instructor policies may specify 'pre booked lessons'.....similar to private hire taxi's requiring a customer to pre book, where as Hackney cabs can 'tout' for business at the kerb (in Liverpool, I know this varies around the country)
Yes, I once attempted to pick up a stranger to teach her a lesson with a cash transaction involved... erm... ok maybe not. LOL.
ETA: "Kerb crawling" is a traffic offence in the UK and you can lose your license for it.
I really like this style of video, because it's something you can listen to while cooking or cleaning etc, i.e. you don't need to be actively watching the screen. Would love to see more like this! :)
Same just did that myself. Tidying the house while listening.
Ashley May do more videos if you cook and clean more. Worth a try?
.....
Jesus Christ is the only hope in this world no other gods will lead you to heaven
There is no security or hope with out Jesus Christ in this world come and repent of all sins today
Today is the day of salvation come to the loving savior Today repent and do not go to hell
Come to Jesus Christ today
Jesus Christ is only way to heaven
Repent and follow him today seek his heart Jesus Christ can fill the emptiness he can fill the void
Heaven and hell is real cone to the loving savior today
Today is the day of salvation tomorrow might be to late come to the loving savior today
Holy Spirit Can give you peace guidance and purpose and the Lord will
John 3:16-21
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
Mark 1.15
15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.
2 Peter 3:9
The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Hebrews 11:6
6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
Jesus
The costs involved in litter picking on motorways/50mph+ roads etc are astronomical, i work for a council down south that require a minimum Of 1 IPV (impact protection vehicle, usually big trucks with a crash cushion that can be lowered at the rear) which is usually crewed by 2-3 workers, and then 3 smaller transit style vans with early lane closure warnings so thats another 3 workers to drive those vans, this is before the workers/vehicle that are actually picking up the litter.
so to summarise for 1 day of litter picking the costs include around 10x daily wages, 4 smaller vehicles and 1 IPV (daily hire cost is around £1k for the IPV alone) all because you couldn't be bothered to take your rubbish home.
don't get me started on the disgusting state of Mcdonald car parks WHICH HAVE BINS EVERYWHERE!!
in the states it has gotten to the point where people have the option of volunteering to pick up a portion of the local road, and the highway department lends them safety vests and warning signs, and tools, and gives them trash bags; and the local garbage hauler picks up the bags from the roadside when they are done.
If tge councils don't spend that money on litter picking do you think they'll reduce our council tax? Exactly, so don't worry about it.
@@stephen3654 so are you saying go ahead and litter so you "get your money's worth"? they may not lower taxes, but if they aren't spending so much money on litter patrol, they will need to spend it somewhere else, like maybe fixing that pothole that annoys you so much.
@@kenbrown2808 yeah, i like to see the different colours of the litter, it brightens up boring grey roads. And also you get more wildlife such as rats and pigeons.
It's not just the cost. Closing the lane or road to litter pick causes delay and congestion.
I feel naked if I don't have my seatbelt on when I'm in my car. I'm also alive today because of the seatbelt.
Risk compensation... Look It up!
@@jbentley2579 why? I know what risk compensation is.
You need to read up on something called risk compensation.
What about seatbelts breaking peoples necks???
@@kevimely7410 they're clearly not wearing them properly if that's happening. Besides the numbers are there. Wear a seat belt.
I have heard a few myths about speed cameras. First one is the paint used for the lines on the road has to be ridged for the camera to work. What...? Second one - If a camera has an exposed hole in it the one in the opposite direction won't work. Double what...? Seatbelts - I once worked with this stupid woman who wouldn't wear her seat belt because it 'traps you in the car if it catches fire.' Okay, point one: If you look at the seat belt where it attaches to the floor you will see a red button. If you press this button the seat belt releases and you can exit the car. Point two: in a crash where the car catches fire you won't be getting out anyway. You will be unconcious after your head slams into the windscreen at 40 mph.
Absolute rubbish! If the car is upside down for example an inertia real seat belt will not loosen and prevent operation of the release button.
@@andrewallen9993 Maybe so. Though many years ago I dated a woman who was in a car with her husband when it crashed and turned upside down. He wasn't wearing his seat belt and was killed. She was, and she got out by herself and suffered nothing worse than whiplash from her head being thrown around when the car turned over. She still suffered with it 20 years later but at least she was alive.
People have been killed in an accident because they were wearing a seatbelt, but statically they save far more lives that they take.
@@Nooziterp1 Inertia seat belts are designed not to loosen if the car isn't right side up and the red button is very hard to press if the belt is under tension. I know I've tried them both.
I like rewatching these older videos, keeps me on top of the highway code without having to read, plus All the effort Ashley puts into these videos deserves the extra watch time. Thanks ash! I want to add, I have a neighbour they have a pickup that's always dirty and you cannot read their number plate, so I wrote '£1000 Fine' in the dirt with an arrow pointing to their numberplate. It's still there 3 weeks later and the numberplate is still unreadable. I guess they never look at the back of their pick up, but I like to think it sends a message to other road users to check thier own boot lid 😁
....
Do you know Jesus Christ can set you free from sins and save you from hell today
Jesus Christ is the only hope in this world no other gods will lead you to heaven
There is no security or hope with out Jesus Christ in this world come and repent of all sins today
Today is the day of salvation come to the loving savior Today repent and do not go to hell
Come to Jesus Christ today
Jesus Christ is only way to heaven
Repent and follow him today seek his heart Jesus Christ can fill the emptiness he can fill the void
Heaven and hell is real cone to the loving savior today
Today is the day of salvation tomorrow might be to late come to the loving savior today
Romans 6.23
For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
John 3:16-21
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
Mark 1.15
15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.
2 Peter 3:9
The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Hebrews 11:6
6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
Jesus
....
Jesus Christ saves
He had mercy on me he can save all who all seek him today He made away through calvery repent of all sins today
Romans 6:23
For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.
Come to Jesus Christ today
Jesus Christ is only way to heaven
Repent and follow him today seek his heart Jesus Christ can fill the emptiness he can fill the void
Heaven and hell is real cone to the loving savior today
Today is the day of salvation tomorrow might be to late come to the loving savior today
Holy Spirit can give you peace purpose and joy and his will today
John 3:16-21
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
Mark 1.15
15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.
2 Peter 3:9
The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Hebrews 11:6
6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
Jesus
#4 - littering does my head in. McD’s wrappers thrown out of car windows being the classic we must have all seen. #10 - even though I know it does cover me, I still went and checked my insurance for driving other cars 😆 Thx Ashley 👍🏻
Just have a sticker with or print the car registration onto every wrapper / container at drive thru's and issue a £50 for each item found. Your average litterer will probably be too lazy to use the walk-in service or remove the sticker.
@@MultiMidden That's a seriously good idea.
@@MultiMidden Oh great, more legislation, more identification. Barcode Britain, nearly complete. Better idea; made bloody McDonald's employ staff to clean up the filth the cause.
Can't stand it either mate, the other day i saw a guy dump a beer can a few feet away from a bin, when I said something he just looked at me like I was an alien.
But remember it only covers you for third party. So if you crash your friend's new Ferrari into an old banger (or a brick wall), it would be very expensive for you! (unless they're a very rich good friend!)
Illegal number plates are a pet hate on mine.
Police do nothing about it as well. From illegal spacing to non-UK font to darkened (anti speed camera?), nothing.
Like the one on Ashley’s Tesla 😂😂
Remove them then if you don’t like yours
Personal number plates are my pet hate, who cares if you’re w33 such and such ……
@@Carl-vl1ne It's perfectly legal to have the 3d gen or 4d raised number plate as long as the size, font and spacing are correct.
Another thing about point 10, if you do have DOC it is often Third Party cover only. You wouldn’t want to find this out after wrapping someone’s new Ferrari round a lamppost.
Is it OK to make RUclips videos whilst driving?
If your static and not handing mobile or cameras then yes it’s perfectly fine
If you’re thinking about getting someone pregnant, you also need to wear a seat belt
Most of these typically come down to how vindictive the cop is feeling. Maybe his missus is sleeping around again and not letting him watch this time. So he's got the monk on and is determined to make people suffer. "I pulled you over because you were doing 31 when you entered that 30 from the 60. You think you're above the law sir?"
Its the last bit of power he has left in his life, so he's determined to abuse it to its fullest extent.
Most officers have something better to do. Like stop criminals.
someone driving 31 in a 30 _is_ a criminal - if the cop can produce evidence and presses the case
@@RoamingAdhocrat now heres someone who looooves the taste of boot polish.
@@davitto01and I suspect that you are one of the people that always think that the police are in the wrong, until you need them that is.
@honestchris7472 guess you missed the part where I said "Most officers have something better to do. Like stop criminals." But I get it. Reading is hard, there were some big words in there. But keep trying slugger, you'll get through the Hungry, Hungry Caterpillar eventually! I believe in you!
@@davitto01 go ahead with the childish insults but you know that I was correct.
Hi Ashley, about “driving anybody else’s car” even with fully comp insurance.
Even if….. you do have it worded on your policy, the other car MUST be insured by somebody else.
This stops the classic “buy and insure a mini, then drive an uninsured Porsche 3rd party on your comp policy”
Absolutely not!
Again, check your policy wording. This is a common misconception, and catches people out when going to collect a new second hand car that has had its original owner’s insurance cancelled
Depends on your policy wording. My comprehensive policy says I can drive any other car under third party cover as long as I don't own the car.
On number 6 I'm going to say no based on the fact that taxi's/hire vehicles operate under a different insurance policy?If you crash, surely there would be questions on why you're doing a driving lesson on New years at 1 in the morning with a drunk student. Also could a court of law state the drunk passenger still has control over the vehicle based on whether or not your driving school car has dual controls? I'd be interested to see, on paper it does sound like a loophole but in a court of law my personal guess is it wouldn't stand. Guess we'll see on new years aha
Dual controls is a good point. I imagine his insurers would soon take an interest too.
It feels obvious to me that student and instructor both need to be not under the influence of alcohol in the first place for a lesson to take place.
Great vid! I've been a driver well over a decade and with no issues but your vids helps to continually improve, keep it up mate, amazing work!
Many years ago I read an article about the psychology of driving. One point was raised which stated that the danger time was around the ten year mark. Where drivers plateaued and stopped learning, thinking 'they can drive '. You haven't fallen into that mistake, keep on learning with Ashley and have a safe driving experience
Jesus Christ saves
He had mercy on me he can save all who all seek him today He made away through calvery repent of all sins today
Romans 6:23
For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.
Come to Jesus Christ today
Jesus Christ is only way to heaven
Repent and follow him today seek his heart Jesus Christ can fill the emptiness he can fill the void
Heaven and hell is real cone to the loving savior today
Today is the day of salvation tomorrow might be to late come to the loving savior today
Holy Spirit can give you peace purpose and joy and his will today
John 3:16-21
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
Mark 1.15
15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.
2 Peter 3:9
The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Hebrews 11:6
6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
Jesus
....
Do you know Jesus Christ can set you free from sins and save you from hell today
Jesus Christ is the only hope in this world no other gods will lead you to heaven
There is no security or hope with out Jesus Christ in this world come and repent of all sins today
Today is the day of salvation come to the loving savior Today repent and do not go to hell
Come to Jesus Christ today
Jesus Christ is only way to heaven
Repent and follow him today seek his heart Jesus Christ can fill the emptiness he can fill the void
Heaven and hell is real cone to the loving savior today
Today is the day of salvation tomorrow might be to late come to the loving savior today
Romans 6.23
For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
John 3:16-21
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
Mark 1.15
15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.
2 Peter 3:9
The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Hebrews 11:6
6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
Jesus
Number 6. If it’s a pre-booked job and you have relevant insurances then I’d see no problem.
I am a licensed taxi driver, but conduct tours in London for a fixed price. These are agreed beforehand.
Only issue in the example you provided Ash is that as you soliciting someone as a passenger in a public place then it’s touting for business (illegal and a fine of up to £2500). I’m sure you already know this though ☺️
....
Jesus Christ is the only hope in this world no other gods will lead you to heaven
There is no security or hope with out Jesus Christ in this world come and repent of all sins today
Today is the day of salvation come to the loving savior Today repent and do not go to hell
Come to Jesus Christ today
Jesus Christ is only way to heaven
Repent and follow him today seek his heart Jesus Christ can fill the emptiness he can fill the void
Heaven and hell is real cone to the loving savior today
Today is the day of salvation tomorrow might be to late come to the loving savior today
Holy Spirit Can give you peace guidance and purpose and the Lord will
John 3:16-21
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
Mark 1.15
15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.
2 Peter 3:9
The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Hebrews 11:6
6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
Jesus
I have had other motorists say that you *MUST* be given 10%+2mph before you can be ticketed for speeding, insisting _its the law_ but these so-called _"armchair solicitors"_ can *NEVER* say which act of Parliament mandates this
Nah, there is nothing to support this. The only reason the cops do it is to cover speedo errors and that, which we all know but the armchair lawyers will argue. 🤷🏻♂️
@@Richard_Barnes I have said there should be a *NARROW* margin of error - 3mph max in case a driver "flickers" over but *NEVER* 10%+2MPH that's up to 80mph on motorways - too much
@@Keithbarber 80mph on the motorway is perfectly safe, what are you talking about?
70 was decided 5 decades ago and largely based on the stopping distance of vehicles with milk bottle tops for brakes. Modern cars can stop much quicker, 70 limit is utterly outdated legislation in 2022.
@@Keithbarber it is not the speed that matters but inappropriate speed. Frankly in a modern car on an empty motorway then 80mph is safe but illegal, but on a rainy day with legal but close to the limit tyres on a busy motorway then frankly 60mph is too much.
Personally I don’t speed as it’s less stressful to pootle along in the “slow”lane at 60ish with as much of a gap between me and the car in front as I can get without everyone pulling it to it every 5 seconds.
But the argument that speed kills is BS. If they move the speed limit down to 60 then 70 would be dangerous as it’s over the limit but at the moment it’s perfectly safe now. It’s how you drive that makes it dangerous.
@@Richard_Barnes It's slightly different than that, police speed equipment is tested and approved to be accurate to +/-2mph up to a speed of 66mph and then 3% for speeds higher than that. This is often why that threshold plus a little more is used as a threshold to prosecute because it cuts through the whole calibration argument and is much more likely to result in conviction. The police are not giving people leeway for their speedo's, only leeway for their ability to be absolutely sure you were speeding!
More importantly, this is simply ACPO guidance, if a the police are absolutely certain you were 1mph over they are still free to prosecute.
My source for this was the Association of Chief Police Officers guidance for England, Wales and Northern Ireland - Speed Enforcement Guidance Section 9.7
Personally, I hate policemen wearing speedo's, not a great look in your rear view mirror.
@2:50 i'm glad that you mentioned about medical exemptions. For years before my dad died he had a seatbelt mmedical exemption for his colostomy bag, with him having crohn's and and having to wear a bag sometimes a seatbelt was too painful on his stoma. Although when he could he'd always wear one.
Technically, one unit of alcohol is “safe” (this takes into account the strength of the alcohol and is “generally” applicable to everyone…) except, as you say, there are other factors and WHATEVER the amount, it will ALWAYS affect judgement. I agree with you entirely - why risk it…and not for a fine or disqualification, but for that person injured for life or even dead. I wish there was a zero limit and no possible excuse to get out of disqualification.
Technically no unit of alcohol is safe as any alcohol will have an effect on ones cognitive behavour. Anyway when this bill was passed in the 1960 s it didn't take into account that a pint of beer could be anything between 3 and 9 % alcohol and that a big big difference. So one pint of 8% alcohol may very well take you right over the limit so nothing by mouth is the safest bet and keeps you on the road. I saw too many collisions grief and death on our roads caused by the consumption of alcohol and on many occasions the police had to let the driver off just because he or she had consumed some amount of alcohol but was just under the legal limit. tho they caused the a collision in the first place.
I think it would be very hard to enforce a zero limit especially considering we have several dishes such as pastas and dessert pies which use wine/brandy/baileys in their ingredients. But I agree for the most part it's best to separate them
There is also "The Morning After". (I typed it that way to give effect.) Many people do not realise that drinking till 3am and then driving the next morning, you can still be over the limit due to other factors like how your body processes the alcohol.
I was once stopped at 5:30am and the police asked when my last drink was (alcoholic) I said midnight and they proceeded to breathalyse me. I blew JUST under the legal limit and they were contemplating whether to send me to the police station to get a more accurate reading. I was lucky but I was in work uniform and told them I'm heading to work and they wasnt sure but let me go because I was very alert, the exact quote from the officer was "I'm gonna let you go, but we do not know if you've been drinking in the last hour or recovering, but you don't seem tired and seem very alert... I could pull you over in 5 mins time and you could blow over however at this stage we're gonna let you off, you're free to go".
@@KayMac1 In Norway they seem to manage...
@@rcraven1013 the unit of alcohol relates to the amount of alcohol in the drink and the standard serving measure...And when the breathalizer started, there was very little choice in strength on the beer market . "Technically" means according to the rules...Practice is another matter.
I think the thing people miss most with speeding is circumstance. there's a huge difference between doing 10mph over the speed limit through a busy city or town centre, compared to doing 10mph over the limit on a wide open A-road or DC.
Both are illegal, both could result in prosecution, as Ashley said, if you do not want a speeding fine do not speed.
@@tony_w839 👍
If everyone who went 80mph on a motorway was prosecuted that would probably be over 50% of the population.
Ref seat belts. When I worked in the motor trade I was told by a police officer that mechanics didn't have to wear a seat belt if they were road testing to diagnose a fault, but only in 30mph speed limit areas (or less).
Two stories from Sydney, Australia (2022 September).
1. A driver exited their property and the front wheels had just touched the road tarmac. At the same time, they were drawing the seat belt across their body and were about to clip it in place when a passing police car stopped and they received a ticket for "Not wear seat restraint".
2. An 85 yo lady used her car horn when a driver came too close during a lane change cutting her off. She was ticketed for using the horn for longer than needed -- the officer told her she used it for 1 second longer than she needed to.
After contacting a local talk back radio station, the presenter contacted the local police Commander and the ticket was withdrawn; the lady had decided NOT to pay the fine, instead to have a court decide the case.
#7 eating and drinking, should also cover chatting away to a camera whilst driving... I've seen so many videos where drivers are spending more time looking at cameras than the road.
Driving without due care and attention.
I recently saw something about a guy who built a bird house beside his garden wall. It looked exactly like a speed camera and slowed down drivers near his house. Brilliant!!! :-D
In Germany, speed cameras are nicknamed "Starenkasten" - sparrow box, a.k.a. bird house.
That would have lasted 20 minutes around here
Totally lost interest and stopped watching the moment I realised you drivexa tesla ... 😅I
Glad you cleared some of things matters up as the ambiance amongst some drivers is soo bloody minded!
Really good video! Loved it!
On the topic of seat belts for pregnant people, there are little pillows with an extra loop you can buy that place the seatbelt so it rests in a position that isn't harmful to the unborn child. These don't really make a difference for 99.99% of driving, but if you have to brake hard (or get into an accident) the proper position of the seat belt will have made sure not to cause any damage. Great tenner to spend if you are or plan on getting pregnant.
Wish you'd have covered driving with front fog lights on when there's no fog, absolute pet hate of mine, and I believe a £30 fine. Just wish it was enforced.
Yep. The same people who drive with them on when it's NOT foggy, somehow can't figure out how to put them on when it IS FOGGY! That and when they put high/full beams on in fog! 😡😡
Mine too. What's up with these folk, mindless driving?
@@pilotboy2612 They think it makes them look cool!
I once had a police car pull in front of me on the M42 and flash a sign telling me to switch my foglights off, which I obviously complied with. I'd been on the unlit - and very quiet - M50 and the fogs made a real difference when I couldn't have main beams on, but I'd forgotten to switch them off when I got to the busier M5. And yes, I hate facing all the unnecessary glare from foglights in no fog. At least my car automotically cancels all fog lights when the ignition is turned off, so no driving round for days like it.
Alternatively, my auto lights don't recognise fog so I have to consciously switch headlights on. Other than that, I find auto lights are brilliant.
Hehe when I got my first car, a car I'd never driven before, for a few days I was confused wondering why the high-beams were so weak. Then I realised I'd been turning the fog lights on and off, thinking that was the high-beam switch! Luckily I'd been "dipping" the lights for oncoming cars, so no-one was dazzled, but ugh man I cringe so hard at that mistake now haha how did I pass a test and then do this *facepalm*
one of the funny things about car insurance is that it isn't the car that is insured, and even funnier, it isn't the driver either. it is the combination of the two a specific driver with a specific vehicle.
Another great video, thanks. Watched a few of yours over the last year finally subscribed, looking forward to more meaningful content. Good work.
One question for you, high beams, is it safe or okay to drive behind someone with high beams on? Even if you're trying to make a point? Driving on the motorway this weekend I noted a few middle lane huggers (another pet hate) with full beams. Also in the past I've experienced cautious/nervous drivers that I've passed carefully that feel the need to flip the full beams on, even if they've been driving cautiously in country roads with them off!
Second question I see many articles about the use of 3rd party apps or cam footage to initiate and process prosecutions. Whilst I don't have a problem per se with this to improve road safety and have aggressive and dangerous drivers taken off the roads, I do have concern at the lack of visibility of these measures and what it may mean in terms of general road policing and police forces commitment to police the roads by being actually present. Any thoughts?
Finally absolutely agree on the litter bug bare living in the country side it is no end of frustration to me seeing empty bottles/ cans fast food wrappers in the gutters and hedge rows. I remember growing up and a seemingly great public pick up litter campaign featuring Ronnie Corbett (being buried) and the message being enforced at school, worked wonders on me (along with my parents encouraging me to bag it and take it home).
Rant over 😉
You would probably get away with charging to drive someone home as a lesson if it was pre-booked but they'd prosecute you for plying for hire if you stopped on the road and offered to drive someone.
What if he stopped and offered someone a lesson though?
What about insurance for this random stranger ? Is not an offence being committed here, no insurance ?
@@ianm144 The person would probably be insured if receiving a lesson I would imagine.
Also worth pointing out if your insurance policy does include DOC (Driving Other Cars) that it is in most cases Third Party Only, the legal minimum. This means you are covered for damage to other road users but not the vehicle you are driving.
Didn't there used to be a stipulation stating purpose, usually for test driving a car you were considering buying. I can imagine the auto retail industry influencing that.
Been a while since veiwing your vids Ashley, another informative vid as ever. One question, you stated that you are "exempt" from seatbelt requirement when teaching a learner as a driving instructor, does the same apply to me as a private individual teaching a driver without renumeration? I ask only out of interest as any "driving instruction" I would offer would be carried out off road, such as failed hillclimb recovery or low grip driving (skid pan) which is not easably obtainable otherwise and beyond the normal remit of general proficiancy
Something you didn't mention with regards to payment for travel - aside from invalidating your license, it also invalidates your insurance. If you're deemed to be doing commercial work but only have SDP coverage, you're going to be liable for any costs incurred and are effectively committing a further offence by driving without insurance.
I have some bad news for you, Ashley. Just because you use a VPN, it doesn't mean your data is safe
is this a threat? 😂
@@W1CKED__ ha ha, no. But I figured I would let him know, so he doesn't have the false sense of security 😄
Back this winter (in broad daylight) I saw a car with a completely unreadable dirty rear number plate drive directly in front of a Police vehicle on a straight road for 5mins. It was right in the Cops' faces all that time- but they did nothing. It was about 10am, so I reckon they just wanted to get home after the night shift.
That was really helpful. I am a taxi driver and didn't know that I am allowed to drive without a seatbelt...it makes sense in some cases to not wear it. Especially in London, at night time, dangerous people around. It would be much easier to leave your car without a seatbelt. But I will still wear my seatbelt for my safety...
Hi Ash, something you could add about numberplates, they need to show the supplier, and the suppliers postcode. just a small point, but enough to get a fine, if you do not have them on your numberplate and you are stopped by the police, and they carry out a vehicle check.
No.10 - I'm old enough to remember when FULLY comp actually meant fully comp! Infuriates the life of me now having to go thru so many add on options when trying to compare quotes.
Agreed. At least they are no longer allowed to offer super cheap deals to new customers and add the cost onto existing customers anymore.
@@ianl1052 sadly, all that does is put prices up for everyone. It never affected me bcos I never stayed with the same insurer for more than 2 consecutive years anyway.
Bit like when all those incel men couldn't cope with women getting cheaper prices and took it to court claiming sexist discrimination, which it wasn't, it was pure stats, women cost less to insure. Men's prices didn't go down, they just put women's prices up. Unbelievably myopic.
@@RichO1701e
I can't speak for motor insurance because I recently changed to a bigger slightly more powerful car so there was no comparison. But my building insurance dropped by over £100. My mom's too.
@@RichO1701e Not much of a feminist are you
@@RichO1701e
Another thought occurred to me thanks to FROOB202's comment.
Women demand equality in nearly all aspects of life (especially pay - rightly so) until it comes to something that *negatively* impacts them.
Point in case being the state pension age. As soon as women were told they would have to work longer to reach parity with their male counterparts, there was an uproar.
Those drivers shown at 1:05 are probably cut up racers. Those guys deserve way harsher penalties for the dangerous driving they love to do. But it's currently being glorified by multiple popular channels on RUclips.
When you're younger it's cool, fun and your hobby. When you get older you become more aware of your mortality and hate this sort of thing. I think they should only be doing this when the roads are empty and there's other road users in sight.
@@MCJimboy10 Empty roads with no other road-users in sight are called race tracks. That's where they should be racing, not on public roads, even empty ones.
The other point about the clip was that it came from a car that was a centre lane hog.
Sentences for this kind of road racing ought to include mandatory confiscation and crushing of the cars involved, which the perpetrators are required to sit and watch happening. Televise a few crushings and I think it'd put the average boy racer *_right_* off the idea.
@@ianmason. I'm not so sure. They believe they are invincible and will never be caught. They firmly believe they can outrun the police, egged on by the RUclips channels mentioned above sharing that kind of stuff.
1:05 if you can be overtaken on the motorway or dual carriagway on the left you are in the wrong lane . . .
....
Do you know Jesus Christ can set you free from sins and save you from hell today
Jesus Christ is the only hope in this world no other gods will lead you to heaven
There is no security or hope with out Jesus Christ in this world come and repent of all sins today
Today is the day of salvation come to the loving savior Today repent and do not go to hell
Come to Jesus Christ today
Jesus Christ is only way to heaven
Repent and follow him today seek his heart Jesus Christ can fill the emptiness he can fill the void
Heaven and hell is real cone to the loving savior today
Today is the day of salvation tomorrow might be to late come to the loving savior today
Romans 6.23
For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
John 3:16-21
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
Mark 1.15
15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.
2 Peter 3:9
The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Hebrews 11:6
6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
Jesus
Just noticed on the video that your numberplate holder looks like it's covering the details of manufacturer and postcode of supplier, is this legal, or can this be covered up? Thanks
There are some gatso cameras that are known as 'flasher units'. In other words they only flash, don't take pictures and can be inaccurate regarding the speed that they flash at (normally above the signed limit). They can often flash for traffic travelling the other way (towards them on the other side of the road).
Alot of the Gatso cameras theses days are empty, they use old, outdated technology. The favourite seems to be Specs/Vector average speed check cameras. I see people slow down for the cameras and then speed up again, they clearly don't know how they work. They work by capturing you on the way into the zone and then time how long it takes to get to the other camera and work out your speed. The number of average speed check cameras throughout the UK is growing.
That was interesting on many counts, but your mention of driving other vehicles under a fully comp policy caught my attention. I changed my vehicle last year, going from a Skoda Yeti to a Honda StepWgn (Yes, that is the spelling!) and for the first time ever, my policy does not (third party) cover driving other vehicles (although I am a named driver on my wife's and my sons' cars).
Regarding the consumption of Alcohol, I never touch a drop if going to drive. I am amazed how many passengers on Trans Atlantic flights drink and then pick up a rental car on arrival- madness.
3rd part cover for other vehicles is gradually being withdrawn. More and more companies aren’t offering it or are restricting who it’s offered to.
Hi Ashley is it Legal to make video and audio recordings while driving as this may distract you?
The 10% + 2 is the point where the police will usually start enforcement. But the limit hasn't changed: once enforcement has started, if you go to court and prove you were doing 65 in a 60 limit instead of 68 then you've just proved you're guilty.
How could you prove that you were doing 65 anyway?
@@Mr.M1STER A lot of the time people will try and get away with speeding by bringing up calibration of the equipment. The tighter the margin, the harder it will be to prove that the equipment was accurate enough (remember it's innocent until proven guilty). If someone goes to court for doing 63 in a 60 limit, they might get away with it by claiming the equipment wasn't accurate enough to prove they were doing over 60. The issue is that people will try and use the same argument to claim that they were not doing 68mph but were doing 65. The prosecution might not be able to provide sufficient evidence to prove they were in fact doing 68 and not 65 as claimed, but the defendant will have admitted to doing 65 in a 60 limit and therefore is guilty of breaking the speed limit.
@@ChrisCooper312 I've heard of people arguing in court that the equipment that would have caught them speeding is out of calibration which is a fair argument imo. However, anyone that claims in court that they were doing 65 in a 60 rather than 68 is just a fool and deserves any penalty given to them. So going back to the OP, I can see how someone might claim the equipment is out of calibration but can't see how anyone would prove they were doing 65, 60 or 68 or any exact figure for that matter.
@@Mr.M1STER I think the OP more means they "admit" they were doing 65 as opposed to "prove", but from a legal point of view that's the same outcome. Guilty.
hello Ashley, taxi drivers are only exempt from wearing seat belts in the zone they can applying for hire in. so if they have a fare to out side that zone they are exempt until the fare ends, then they should wear the seat belt until they are back in the zone they can apply for hire
That's why he said you must be carrying a passenger or plying for hire (it's plying btw, not applying).
@@jeremypnet thank you, for keeping me right :}
Thanks for the heads up on seat belts and reversing. I have a very awkward reverse to park my car outside my property, removing my belt will make it that little bit easier.
Hi Ashley,. Where do you stand with cars that have a toe hook obscuring the number plate ? How does this impact an MOT.
My insurance policy now includes to drive other cars (only becuase I am 25 and over which seems to be roughly the same for most insurers) but its only 3rd party cover and yes as others have said, the other persons car needs to have active insurance policy as well. It came in handy when my car was being repaired from my recent accident and was without my car for a month, I drove my dads car to work for the two days I needed it. Obviously I knew the risks of it being only third party but I as long as I felt confident and be extra careful i was not too worried and nothing happened thankfully!
It works great when used appropriately. Some people look at the driving of other cars cover as more of a permanent solution though to drive other peoples cars regularly which would not be a great idea. If the same person had a spouse or whatever and they regularly shared a car it would make more sense to put their name down on the policy also.
Yes, I think occasional use 3rd party cover is still the norm for fully comp policies, subject to age limit. But Ash is right that you should check.
Checking my 3 policies (all different insurers) I am covered 3rd party occasional use of other vehicles by all of them. But Ash is right, you should check. From one policy wording…
You are covered while driving any other car only if all the following apply:
• your Certificate of Motor Insurance shows you have this cover
• you are driving with the owner’s permission
• you are not entitled to make a claim for the damage under
any other policy of insurance
• the car is not owned by (or hired under a hire purchase
agreement by or leased to) you or your partner
• the car is registered in and being driven in the British Isles.
• you have the required licence to drive the car.
And in the certificate…
The policyholder may also drive, with the owner’s permission, a motor car not belonging to, or hired or leased to them or their partner.
I think the biggest myth is undertaking being classed as careless or reckless driving.
It can be classed as either of these if the police view the undertake as being likely to cause an accident but it is not actually against the law.
@@honestchris7472 That applies to any manouver. The point is that undertaking alone is perfectly legal and not classed as CD or DD.
@@JohnFarrell-bc8gt I would say that if a person was undertaking a car that was lane hogging the outer lane, that would not be classed as dangerous and would prosecute the lane hogger, not the person being forced to undertake.
...
Do you know Jesus Christ can set you free from sins and save you from hell today
Jesus Christ is the only hope in this world no other gods will lead you to heaven
There is no security or hope with out Jesus Christ in this world come and repent of all sins today
Today is the day of salvation come to the loving savior Today repent and do not go to hell
Come to Jesus Christ today
Jesus Christ is only way to heaven
Repent and follow him today seek his heart Jesus Christ can fill the emptiness he can fill the void
Heaven and hell is real cone to the loving savior today
Today is the day of salvation tomorrow might be to late come to the loving savior today
Romans 6.23
For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
John 3:16-21
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
Mark 1.15
15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.
2 Peter 3:9
The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Hebrews 11:6
6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
Jesus
Most undertaking is careless or reckless driving to be fair. The only prime example of undertaking that isn't considered such is to improve the flow of traffic by moving to the outside lane to undertake traffic on the right.
Not too sure if these old laws are still in place saying that.
1. That a vicar going to or from a service or an urgent call doesn’t have to wear a seat belt.
2. That if a vicar is over the legal drinking limit if they can prove they have just finished the service and they over poured the wine, they have to finish it. That they cannot be prosecuted.
When I was learning to drive, I'd generally arrange lessons on the way to and from work, so technically I was getting a taxi ride, though I was the one driving, so that might have added an extra factor.
Even though I had held a full drivers licence in the UK and NZ for a combined 30 years, when I was on my learners and restricted motorcycle licence, the licence restrictions included a curfew and zero alcohol limit. I think both are important to keep new riders safe, I particularly think drinking and riding a motorcycle is particularly reckless.
For the "driving lesson" one, I'd guess that it would be illegal to provide driving instruction to someone that you know is drunk, so it'd be the hypothetical instructor that would land themselves in hot water.
It is worth mentioning about number 10, that the car you are going to drive that is NOT yours must still have insurance on it
Good points well made.
4:59 drifting between lanes before switching lanes without signalling. Brilliant driving mate
There are parked cars on his left. He can straddle lanes if he's passing parked cars. He doesn't need to indicate if he's pulling in front of a parked car because there's no one in it. The same applies if you are driving on an empty road, you don't need to indicate.
I suggest obtaining a new highway code and reading it. When I drove for a living, I bought a new highway code annually because rules are added and changed regularly.
@@Aye-McHunt My copy clearly states on the cover "With a Foreword by Ernest Marples".
Many many years ago (1980s) I think most comp policies gave third party cover for driving of other cars "not owned by you and not used under a hire purchase agreement". Indeed, mine at the time allowed driving of any other vehicle (not just cars!)
Mine gives me 3rd party coverage on other cars. I thought you could get it when you took out a fully comp policy after a certain age. Now I'm going to have to double check my insurance to make sure.
As long as you hold a licence for that category of vehicle surely...
The exact wording on my current policy is "The policyholder may also drive with the consent of the owner a private motor car not owned by and not hired under a hire purchase or self-drive hire agreement to the policyholder.".
my first policy was 3rd party only and that had it. now it has been reworded so that the car must be insured and mot'd too. sometimes you have to ask for it to be added though.
@@ianmason. Mine says the same thing, with an extra comment that it is third party cover only, separately I believe the vehicle needs to be insured itself or covered by a policy of the owner/keeper.
The 10% rule is based on the size of your wheels, manufacturers don’t calibrate speedometers to the wheel size cars are sold with, a speedometer won’t match the gps speed of a car if you compare it to an identical car with different size wheels, that’s how some people can drive through a 60mph camera at 66 and not receive a ticket, because their gps speed would indicate their car was doing 60 mph while their speedometer would show 66 mph.
Great comment about the driving lesson for those over the limit
The one that really shocked me was taxi drivers don't need to use a seat belt but passengers do 🤔 Absolute madness
It's for their safety in case someone tries to strangle them with it.
It's the passengers that can fly forward hitting the driver not the driver flying into passengers mind you there's still airbags.
It's in case the driver is attacked by the passengers. Makes perfect sense when you think about it.
@@RichO1701e Mind you if the driver is wearing their belt when they're attacked they can swerve and hit something or turn the car over without worrying too much
@@jens5567 Given how lardy some London cabbies are, I suspect it's to stop them strangling *_themselves_* with their seat belt. 😀
Great video Ashley...or should I say NE61 ASH (Great plate btw). Here are a few more additions to your 10 myths. I actually know the answer to most (but not all) these but posting them here to open for discussion:
11. Is it compulsory to have your driving licence on you or do the police still give you a "producer" to go to the local police station to show it within a few days of the traffic stop? Add to that, V5 registration document, proof of ownership and insurance proof?
12. If you have a very minor accident, is it still compulsory to report it to the police and your insurance company?
13. Do the police need a reason to stop you?
14. Can a motorist overtake a "lead vehicle" cyclist within the zig zag area on the approach to a pedestrian crossing? This one I don't actually know the answer to and I've heard conflicting advice.
15. Similar to above, can a cyclist overtake a lead vehicle motorist on the zig zag approach to a pedestrian crossing? Repeat the question also for cyclist overtaking another cyclist as the "lead vehicle". I don't know the answer to these ones either.
11. Not compulsory, police can ask you to produce at a police station within a set time (believe 7 days?). Insurance proof you will need to provide on the road side, v5 or proof of ownership is a bit muddier with leasing etc
12. Insurance yes, police technically yes?
13. Police can stop any motorist for any reason (including no reason)
14. & 15. The cyclist position is irrelevant, they are treated as vehicles either way, and vehicles should not overtake on the zig zags
The answer to all those is no. Basically.
The cyclist on zig zags is interesting but counts as filtering which isn't allowed on them for motorcycles so should apply to cyclist as well. People could be walking between the cars as zebra crossing for example.
The police will give you a producer if you don't have the licence and they don't need a reason to stop you.
12 - depends on what's been damaged and to what extent. Say, a pole that's got a traffic sign and you've bent it, the road furniture belongs to local government. If the only damage is to your vehicle, then no.
13 - no. If you're operating a vehicle on public roads, the fuzz can do a spot check on your vehicle without a reason. This law confuses Americans and people who watch too much American TV.
Zig-zags don't apply to cyclists, only motor vehicles so you can overtake them and they can overate you.
11. I know of a couple of people who still got producers a couple of years ago so I would assume that is still the case now.
12. I know you have to exchange details for sure and report to police if this is not possible but it does not need to be reported to police if you have exchanged details or at least that is my understanding of it, as for insurance this is unclear to me but I know what their answer would be given they can put our premiums up for it.
13. yes
14 and 15. good questions, The highway code says this:
You MUST NOT park on a crossing or in the area covered by the zig-zag lines. You MUST NOT overtake the moving vehicle nearest the crossing or the vehicle nearest the crossing which has stopped to give way to pedestrians.
I would assume this would apply to all in this instance but I guess this also comes down to what is actually defined as being a vehicle especially considering some cyclists mentality of "bike haz no engine iz not vehicle"
being a driver and a cyclist at times I do generally apply all the rules and not just the cyclist ones but this could be down to my interpretation of a vehicle and given the highway code references vehicle in most cases it seems only logical to me to assume it means car, van, bicycle etc
What the law says with rebates to 10% is that manufactures must fit a speedometer that is accurate to within 10%. Therefore if it's less than that, the police have to be ready to be challenged that their speedometer said it was the correct speed.
If when driving you arrive at a give way island on your side of the road with priority to the traffic coming towards you,when you pull out to pass this island do you have to indicate
I was taught, on joining the insurance industry, that the term “fully comprehensive”, in respect of motor insurance, is a meaningless term. In fact, you alluded to possible restrictions in your presentation. Hence, not “fully comprehensive”. I don’t think it’s term you will ever hear a motor insurance professional use. It can lead to misunderstandings/misconceptions.
Like the term, “Act of God”, no such thing.
Great info clip Ashley.
I do find it frustrating that the majority of garage forecourts no longer have a bucket of water and sponge/chamois to allow you to give your lights and plates and windows a quick wipe if you’ve been driving in grotty conditions.
Sadly, too many people would use them for the wrong jobs, contaminating or damaging them. Then they just got stolen.
I did see, recently, a guy washing his car using the free water meant for screenwash top-up. The staff asked him to stop, but he just ignored them. They found the stopcock and left him with a half-cleaned car.
@@nigelcox1451 brilliant! 😂😂😂
They used to have a young lad who for a small tip, would check your oil (fill if necessary) and clean your windows, for a bigger tip they would do the lights and numberplates as well. If you were a regular and regularly tipped, they would even check your type pressures and top em up A valued service, long gone, along with people who used to fill your tank for you. Petrol didn't get any cheaper though. The same thing is happening in supermarkets, they want you to put your own shopping through a crappy self scan till system that's always going wrong, and you don't even get a discount. If you keep doing it, one day, they won't have people working on tills.
As someone who works cleaning on a forecourt the reasons are simple;
Drivers tend to throw rubbish in these screenwash containers.
The squeegee's don't last long (or could be stolen, though I've never seen this - but in the 6 or so years I worked there we only attempted to use screenwash bucket stuff once and nobody used it)
Refilling them with water and cleaning stuff is somewhat of a nuisance which you would have to do very regularly.
And as Nigel stated, people would likely use them to clean parts of their car that quickly dirty the water or perhaps damage the squeegee or even the next person's car that comes to use it (liabilities!)
To top it off, the amount people even use them these days even when they're available is very low from what I noticed.
So in short, they require frequent maintenance that becomes more hassle than they're worth, when it's just easier to let people sort it out themselves.
@@DaveCorbey Lovely nostalgia. At one time, that was me, from early 1972 to Nov '75, and again for a few months late '76. In those days, you could get a part-time job from 14, and were allowed to dispense fuel, so Sat and Sun afternoons, I'd be putting fuel in cars, mending punctures, and other minor breakdown repairs. I remember the furore when petrol went up from 35p to 50p, per gallon. (That's 4.5litres for the younger viewer.)
Hi Ashley, on the matter of the legality of charging for a driving lesson to cover the cost of taking a stranger from the City centre I would suggest that as long as the statement of intent is very clearly expressed and the passenger has no doubt that the fee is for the lesson the police would find it hard to prosecute but the insures would not be so easily duped.
Cheers, Richard.
thank you for this info, Question is it legal to drive with headphones / ear plugs in ?? thank you in advance
To clarify the 10%+ thing, this was ACPO guidelines, and never a fixed rule.
Further, almost all cars will display a speed higher than you’re physically travelling at, because it’s illegal for them to display a speed lower than you’re travelling at. Thus, you get caught speeding, you’re almost certainly deserving of any penalty, even if through a temporary glitch in normal adherence (been there).
I wish more people would realist that their speedometers are inaccurate. I have had a bit of an argument with my dad before as I overtook him in a 50mph zone in my truck and he started moaning at me for speeding lol. Nope not speeding just have an accurate speedometer.
@@Trucker_John_Boy, just as a word of warning, the digital tachos have a second by second speed trace; downloaded a few investigation staff collisions, and it’s scary accurate. That download is available to Police IF they know about it & want it, so, my best advice is, NEVER speed in a truck cos that tacho dont lie.
(Btw, tacho & sat-tracking data concurred with drivers’ statements, had no reason to disbelieve any driver therefore, and no blameworthy decision given by me through that!)
@@paulcollyer801 The ACPO guidelines of 10%+2 were orginally because of the accuracy of the measuring equipment. I'm sure with passage of time, accuracy of speed cameras has improved across all types. However, all measuring equipment has a margin of error, its an inescapable engineering fact, even if it is much less than it used to be. So there will probably still be a margin for error.
The same with tachos, there will be a margin for error in there, tyres wear and change circumference, it can't be overcome.
@@bazzacuda_, the tech used now, eg the laser guns, have a high degree of accuracy, and the onboard cameras that also calculate speed, are also very accurate. Calibration is key, so many officers will calibrate the kit at the start of a shift so as to not have to check calibration date or time later.
I understand that some of the breath boxes also need calibrating regularly, with one type not working if not calibrated, and that’s just the roadside device. The intoxiliser, the machine back at the nick, calibrates before each test.
#2. Yes you could still be prosecuted however you are not providing an accurate picture here. The 10%+Xmph allowance is up to the discretion of the police officer (specific allowance varies from police forces, generally being 10%+1/2mph), most of them aren't going to do anything about it unless you are taking the piss (especially on a motorway as pulling someone over on a motorway is dangerous, they only do it if it is worth the risk). You will not be prosecuted for speeding through a speed camera within the allowance, speaking from my own experience as well as first hand accounts from police officers.
Another issue is calibration. With a half decent lawyer it would be fairly easy for someone to get a ticket thrown out for being 1mph above the limit unless the prosecution was able to provide very accurate and up to date calibration data. On the other hand providing sufficient evidence that the equipment is calibrated enough to show 10%+Xmph is far easier, if it is even brought up. Most people at being told they were doing 36 in a 30 limit would say "fair cop" or try and fight on other grounds (signage etc) instead of trying to claim they were actually doing 29 and the equipment was fault.
And most speedos, even digital ones, aren’t accurate and (possibly deliberately) over-read speed. My 3 vehicles, self tested against a couple of different sat-NAV devices, show somewhere around 5 to 10% over.
05:26 *"Using your horn like a stress ball..."*, I love it!!!
Reminds me of when, the Netherlands was in LOCKDOWN and shops had to close.
Only drugstores, supermarkets and essential retail stores were allowed to open. Marks were allowed and shops also cleverly responded to this, the rule was also immediately adjusted that this was not allowed.
So there's a chance it could, because you're just teaching driving. It wouldn't surprise me though that they're coming up with a law to prevent this.
Sorry Ashley your 1mph above is wrong wrong wrong why well because it was challenged in a court of law by a lawyer who was done for 32mph in a 30 he brought in evidence that the speedometer commissioner for Europe admitted that brand new cars were found to be 11% out. You should read truck magazines they tell you everything. Lots of present an ex traffic cops interviews.
The last point is why I always prefer finding a cheap rental or taking a share car. Often not worth the insurance headaches to borrow someone else’s car.
The part about horn abuse, its the same rule with delivery vehicles that have a reverse beeper, you're not allowed them on after 11pm until 7am. Unfortunately the lorry i drive, I can't turn it off
my policy says i can drive other people's cars but only under 3rd party, and i even asked this when calling up to renew my policy, and they had also said the same. I thought that was more common than mentioned in the video though, maybe I'm just lucky with my policy,
great video!
Interesting and helpful 🙂
Regarding insured to drive other vehicles, if your insurance states you can, 99% of the time it will state providing the vehicle is already insured by the registered keeper. So don't think you can get in a friends car that is not currently covered by a policy.
#6 - Just wondering (and I'm assuming it doesn't) but would this also go for when your mates offer to pay rather than you asking?
#4 littering - also one of my pet hates. I really don't understand it, you're in a car, you're going to fuel up or go home or go work etc, all places with bins, use the fucking bin..
@7:00 - no, I don't think you'd get away with that, how can you give a driving lesson to someone under the influence - in the same way, you can't instruct someone else driving if you're under the influence.
Someone I know has just been sent a letter giving the choice between points or a course for speeding.
31mph in a 30 limit.
With the comprehensive insurance question when you started with a no I was thinking "but the option I choose and I look for in mine is, use of any other vehicle if they have comprehensive insurance and give you permission to drive you are then covered as a 3rd party" which to me means it would cover the other car not the one I'm driving in an accident.... So also something to consider
I was parked in the exact same spot on Trinity Road at 4:23 just recently.
Small world 😁
#10: the UK is the only country I know of that does this, and it's absolutely infuriating. The cost of adding someone to your insurance just to drive your car once is exorbitant.
Littering is also one of my biggest pet hates. Why cant you just take it home or stop at a litter bin if it upsets you that much
Nothing like a good driving lesson after a night out on the town!
Regarding seat belts, I believe that if your vehicle is old enough to have been manufactured without seatbelts (such as the 1963 Ryley Elf Mk2 I used to own) then you are exempt from wearing one as well.
I remember I was pulled over once while driving my little classic and was informed it was for no seatbelt. I said "What seat belt, the car doesn't have them.". Mr. Bobby stuck his head into the car and stated that there were seatbelt mounts so I should have fitted them so I was going to get a ticket anyway. At this point I informed him that as the car was manufactured in 1963, and the British Standard kite mark covering seat belt mounts wasn't passed till 1965, if I fitted seatbelts and was in an accident there was nothing to state that the seatbelt mount would hold.
Mr. Bobby went off to consult his talking broach then came back and said "On your way.".
I miss that car
😢
seat belt annecdote:- my son is paraplegic and actually needs to wear a seat belt to ensure upper body stability/security especially against any leg spasm. He was pulled over for not having his seat belt on*... he was wearing a black T shirt at the time. My son insisted he was wearing his seat belt, and when the cop realised he was a wheelchair user he said he'd "let him off" .... but wouldn't admit he could have been mistaken.
* I think he'd driven past a motor cycle cop, and a few yards further on was flagged down into a weighbridge/inspection area in the middle of a huge motorway junction roundabout (M11 harlow south interchange)
I thought all these where pretty obvious until the fully comped one, ty
Littering is my pet hate. There is a pristine ancient wood behind our house, except where a lane runs through it. As you get closer the cans, bottles, plastic bags, builders waste increase. There is even a smell of human waste.
I did not know that about passengers in a taxi having to wear a seatbelt so thank you!
It goes also as “not in proper control of your vehicle” more so than due care
Your mic reminded me of some austin powers style chest hair haha. Interesting and informative video!