No... why sister? Say I, David, married Angela. Angela has a brother, Eric. Eric is married to Isabelle. I, David, slept with Isabelle. How is she my sister?
@@DanielHai-ow3km that’s one possibility like I pointed out. That’s the wife’s brother’s wife case. If you, David, have a sister, Mary who has a husband, Erik, Erik is your brother in law and your sister is your brother in law’s wife. That’s the other case where it means sleeping with your sister.
Even if he plays with 100% accuracy, shouldn't the performance be equal to stockfish, like how would you know it is past 3600 performance if no one is that high ELO?
"He's just getting mated... ...that's one of the problems." As if there could be other problems when you're getting mated. Love it when Carlson streams, even if this clip is a bit older.
at 4:50 the engine says black is winning. Can anyone explain why his opponent chose to move his rook instead of taking magnus's rook with his bishop, or even move his knight out of the way?
They have less than a minute on the clock.I think he decided to move the rook out of the white queens attack because the black queen struggles to defend against the promoting pawn, backrank mate, and after bxa5 the promotion field is controlled by white. He probably considered the black rook as more important than the white rook on a2 in that position
i think if he takes rook then magnus can take the knight with bishop. which also targets the queen. and the queen cant strike back because otherwise magnus queen takes his rook. and threatens backrank checkmate. which then pins his bishop in the backrank and his queen on the diagonal protecting the bishop.
I think its because the brilliant move can kead to many different positions and its a but if a longer sequence until a real winning position or checkmate. But after the moves are made, its able to calculate since there are less moves to count in for. I have no clue, this is just my logic
Honestly, this performance doesn't serve as a parameter. I myself have had some (recent) games where I had a performance of 700/800 and 1750/2250 on the same day.Furthermore, performance seems quite relative to your rating, so if your rating is 1000 +/- you will hardly have a performance of 2000+, even if, effectively, you have a level of 2000
Because the ratings are completely different. Engine ratings are not comparable to human ratings at all, and especially not online ratings. A 3000 rated engine is not the same as a 3000 rated online player or even OTB player.
It's cause the moment he takes rook, it's game over. Black takes white rook and pawn take the rook and at the same time become a queen and it's checkmate Normally that pawn would become a queen at square which is in check by black queen but after taking black rook, it promotes in 1 perfect space between king and queen diagonal. Not sure about why he didn't just moved a pawn up to create a space however. Most likely we are missing the foresight
4:18 bishop doesnt take rook on a2 because then white has BxNa5 attacking queen. if queen takes then rook hanging and queen trade so bad endgame otherwise if queen moves anywhere white simply takes on b5 and its equal position since white gets more active pieces as compensation for rook. so, its not a free rook, its simply a rook trade in disguise
Magnus was just reading chat comments while playing this GM ;) jesus christ ;)) I dunno what to make of it.. I think he is just waiting for this GM to blunder.. opponent played really good and he was up in material by having a pair of bishops.. but he didn t anticipate rook to E8 in time
Bxa5 and if the queen takes the rook would hang, and if the queen is moved you take on b5 and the pawns are a thorn in blacks position that you will probably have to sac the exchange back for eventually.
If queen takes the rook then he takes back the queen his queen. A rook for queen, how is that a bad trade and magnus rook is still hanging. I am horribly confused about middle game. @@thunderfox101
@@lordblanck7923 If black takes the rook, then white would take the knight on a5, if the queen takes, then the queen would no longer guard the rook on a8, so you could take it, so you have to move the queen. Magnus would get a knight for a rook, but also would have a strong passed pawn that is hard to deal with for black.
@@thunderfox101 sorry I am still not sure. I get that black would take the knight and that would queen in danger which is saving rook and keeping the white pawn in check. But let's say, bishop takes rook then white bishop takes the knight and now bishop is targeting black queen but he can move 1 square besides on left ( C8 ). With this, white bishop no longer controls black queen And queen is still saving rook from whites queen and pawn is still in check cause last square is in control of Black's bishop. You can move the rook after that
@@lordblanck7923 yes, but you also get a pawn and a knight for a rook, that's only one point of material down. Magnus basically thought that the powerful pawn would make up for the one point difference in the long term.
I’m also trash but i spotted this one: if white bishop takes the horse it is also attacking blacks king, forcing it off the back rank. But it’s the solo defender of the black rook allowing whites queen to capture blacks rook (with a very dangerous check)
Whaaaaat???😮😮😮😮 You have done brilliancy in this match and you are this calm? You sacrificed the roooook (or at least offered the opponet to take the riok on a2). How on earth you can see these combinations without even bothering? You are literally a stockfish engine.
From what I can see it would just be a waste of a move, Magnus’ rook is completely trapped and since a rook is an endgame piece it would be completely useless anyway. Since it can’t run and isn’t a threat, it would be a waste of a move to take it. If the board opened up more or Magnus moved his bishop to provide an exit square it likely would’ve been taken at that point but until then it’s technically considered a missing piece already.
@@TWKillaBeastnot quite, bishop take knight attacks the queen and let's the rook free when you don't take it. The actual reason he doesn't take it is because of Bxa5. If the queen takes the rook would hang, and if the queen is moved you take on b5 and the pawns are a thorn in blacks position that you will probably have to sac the exchange back for eventually. Basically, you're sacrificing the exchange for powerful pawns.
I am no expert, im only around 800-1k elo But I think his opponent doesn't kill magnus's rook is because if his opponent kills magnus's rook, magnus will kill opponent's knight with his bishop which then targets the queen, and the opponent can't take the bishop because then magnus can kill the rook with his queen which is mate, so the opponent will move his queen to protect it from magnus's bishop, then magnus can push the passed pawn even forward threatening promotion, so to avoid all this his opponent just moved his rook so magnus's queen doesn't threat checkmate as now the rook also protects the back line (this is just my guess might be wrong)
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
“He’s just getting mated, that is his problem” 💀
Just don't lose, skill issue
That's just one of his problems :0)
"Were simply better at chess"
Bro lost his virginity to chess
that is only one of his problem
"Happens to the best of us"
mans is wild for that ong lol
When i saw this, he said that
@@hirepikepower36 probably got it from weregonnalose
I was looking for this comment
"happens to the best of us"💀
xd
Yeah 💀💀
Magnus casually dominating a 3100 rated gm and got a 3850 performance while talking to the chats is wild
How is it destruction? It was like a five minute game.
"Hes getting mated thats his problem, it happens to the best of us " LOOL
Did he say dude slept with his "brother-in-law's wife"? Doesn't that mean he slept with his sister? Lol
Yes haha or wife’s brother’s wife
happens to the best of us 💀
Must be from rural Georgia
No... why sister?
Say I, David, married Angela.
Angela has a brother, Eric.
Eric is married to Isabelle. I, David, slept with Isabelle.
How is she my sister?
@@DanielHai-ow3km that’s one possibility like I pointed out. That’s the wife’s brother’s wife case. If you, David, have a sister, Mary who has a husband, Erik, Erik is your brother in law and your sister is your brother in law’s wife. That’s the other case where it means sleeping with your sister.
3850 performance? I doubt anyone on the planet can replicate this.
Firouzja?
@@martijndekker1134he's not better than magnus he even said in an interview that he was just lucky magnus was really tilted
Fabiano did this for a whole tournament 😂
Aparantly Hans has had 4 100% perfect games lol 😂
It really isn't any great performance. They just memorised the opening and traps. @@Jimmy19382
Game played February 2023. By today's evaluation he played with 92.6% accuracy or 3300 rating.
Source?
I knew he was washed up
@@drone1756 lol
Even if he plays with 100% accuracy, shouldn't the performance be equal to stockfish, like how would you know it is past 3600 performance if no one is that high ELO?
@@shashankyadav5703 Because we are talking about the ratings on the website, which are somewhat inflated relative to OTB or TCEC.
Relaxed semi retired magnus is even scarier than try hard magnus to be honest
😂
"He's just getting mated, that is his problem" literally everyone's problem when playing magnus
4:38 just 1 mistake that isn't moving the Nb7, Carlsen perfectly played the game
You mean rook b7 ?
thats great!
why nb7? it takes 2 moves to get there
Bro's literally human stockfish 💀💀
stockfish's literally AI magnus💀💀
bro literally bro literally
"He's just getting mated... ...that's one of the problems."
As if there could be other problems when you're getting mated. Love it when Carlson streams, even if this clip is a bit older.
Carlsen. Don't let this happen again...
It really looked too passive from Magnus, but after seeing he had 3800 performance, I guess I am too noob to understand a high level of chess. 😊
No... he was playing solidly while trying to develop in a way that allowed his pieces to go to optimal squares later on.
If anything it was the other guy who was too passive
"how exactly is he defending against e8?" He's not!
Nga is playing a GM and talking to his chat at the same time, bro is him
you should watch Andrew Tang's ultrabullet matches with GMs or Hikaru blitz matches with GMs. Andrew is insane at ultrabullet btw
At 4:30 why black bishop didnt hit the rook??
Sounds pretty gay.
@@axelbruv?
Becaus white take knight on a5
@@gameking2434After black didnt take rook
3:45
4:10
Bro was having the hardest time of his life
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Kramnick would like a word
3:45 fart??????
fried intestine attack
idk how you heard that but thanks for pointing it out
4:09 and he fires off round number two
4:30 and a third time
man hes hungry thats why he ate that GM
at 4:50 the engine says black is winning. Can anyone explain why his opponent chose to move his rook instead of taking magnus's rook with his bishop, or even move his knight out of the way?
They have less than a minute on the clock.I think he decided to move the rook out of the white queens attack because the black queen struggles to defend against the promoting pawn, backrank mate, and after bxa5 the promotion field is controlled by white. He probably considered the black rook as more important than the white rook on a2 in that position
i think if he takes rook then magnus can take the knight with bishop. which also targets the queen. and the queen cant strike back because otherwise magnus queen takes his rook. and threatens backrank checkmate. which then pins his bishop in the backrank and his queen on the diagonal protecting the bishop.
Queen can comeback protected by bishop and offer exchange. I still don't get it why opponent didn't took the rook
What I struggle to understand is how he got 3800 rating out of a game where the engine clearly states he blundered a piece.
Okay nice performance but do we just gonna ignore 1:09???
Ikr??? Like wtf?
Never let bro cook again 💀
He's just joking with a troll commenter in his livestream chat
Recorded before HD and 4k was invented I assume.
One question, How an engine, estimated to be around 3400-3600, can know your calculating at 3850? Is there a fixed pattern for this?
I think its because the brilliant move can kead to many different positions and its a but if a longer sequence until a real winning position or checkmate. But after the moves are made, its able to calculate since there are less moves to count in for. I have no clue, this is just my logic
Honestly, this performance doesn't serve as a parameter. I myself have had some (recent) games where I had a performance of 700/800 and 1750/2250 on the same day.Furthermore, performance seems quite relative to your rating, so if your rating is 1000 +/- you will hardly have a performance of 2000+, even if, effectively, you have a level of 2000
@@vitorpeixeira6194 Just seems like you played one match much better than the other
Because the ratings are completely different. Engine ratings are not comparable to human ratings at all, and especially not online ratings. A 3000 rated engine is not the same as a 3000 rated online player or even OTB player.
@@DanLyndonso How is it then?
5:22 why not Kf8?
Queen b7
At this point chess already just became definition of phrase "no, my kung fu is better than yours"
How do they know the performance rating?
1:09 💀"i slept with my brother in law's wife now family is pissed"bruh💀💀
What was the problem with QB7 instead of the pawn to D7? It becomes a winning position when he moves QB6
Am 2400 and I can't understand what was happening when it started getting complicated. Rooks hanging and the other GM not taking
Exactly
It's cause the moment he takes rook, it's game over. Black takes white rook and pawn take the rook and at the same time become a queen and it's checkmate Normally that pawn would become a queen at square which is in check by black queen but after taking black rook, it promotes in 1 perfect space between king and queen diagonal.
Not sure about why he didn't just moved a pawn up to create a space however. Most likely we are missing the foresight
4:18 bishop doesnt take rook on a2 because then white has BxNa5 attacking queen. if queen takes then rook hanging and queen trade so bad endgame otherwise if queen moves anywhere white simply takes on b5 and its equal position since white gets more active pieces as compensation for rook. so, its not a free rook, its simply a rook trade in disguise
Magnus was just reading chat comments while playing this GM ;) jesus christ ;)) I dunno what to make of it.. I think he is just waiting for this GM to blunder.. opponent played really good and he was up in material by having a pair of bishops.. but he didn t anticipate rook to E8 in time
magnus destroys 3100 gm with 3850 perfor...
*69 missed calls from kramnik*
3850 is consider Stockfish?
Why the f did black not take the rook on a2 at 4:50? Even stockfish suggests it
Bxa5 and if the queen takes the rook would hang, and if the queen is moved you take on b5 and the pawns are a thorn in blacks position that you will probably have to sac the exchange back for eventually.
If queen takes the rook then he takes back the queen his queen. A rook for queen, how is that a bad trade and magnus rook is still hanging. I am horribly confused about middle game. @@thunderfox101
@@lordblanck7923 If black takes the rook, then white would take the knight on a5, if the queen takes, then the queen would no longer guard the rook on a8, so you could take it, so you have to move the queen. Magnus would get a knight for a rook, but also would have a strong passed pawn that is hard to deal with for black.
@@thunderfox101 sorry I am still not sure. I get that black would take the knight and that would queen in danger which is saving rook and keeping the white pawn in check.
But let's say, bishop takes rook then white bishop takes the knight and now bishop is targeting black queen but he can move 1 square besides on left ( C8 ). With this, white bishop no longer controls black queen And queen is still saving rook from whites queen and pawn is still in check cause last square is in control of Black's bishop. You can move the rook after that
@@lordblanck7923 yes, but you also get a pawn and a knight for a rook, that's only one point of material down. Magnus basically thought that the powerful pawn would make up for the one point difference in the long term.
0:50 what happened here
He premoved. Black took magnus his knight and instantly took back the knight from black
@@jeroenn_ thanks
4:49 Why didn't blacks white bishop take rook.. can someone explain ???.. im trash at chess
I’m also trash but i spotted this one: if white bishop takes the horse it is also attacking blacks king, forcing it off the back rank. But it’s the solo defender of the black rook allowing whites queen to capture blacks rook (with a very dangerous check)
Why couldn’t black take the rook at 4:40
0:49 Where The Knight Gone? 😮
It got hit by his pawns. He didnt see that because magnus premove this
1:10 ☠️
Why didn't Magnuses opponent take the pawn at 1:30
If nxc4 then Qb3
But then nb6
Whaaaaat???😮😮😮😮
You have done brilliancy in this match and you are this calm? You sacrificed the roooook (or at least offered the opponet to take the riok on a2).
How on earth you can see these combinations without even bothering?
You are literally a stockfish engine.
World champion....
at 4k ELO, you should be a Ultra GM
3850?!? He can probably beat stockfish
Not in million years
Just not physically possible man. It's like saying you would win against a plane in a race.
Why not bishop take rook?
From what I can see it would just be a waste of a move, Magnus’ rook is completely trapped and since a rook is an endgame piece it would be completely useless anyway. Since it can’t run and isn’t a threat, it would be a waste of a move to take it. If the board opened up more or Magnus moved his bishop to provide an exit square it likely would’ve been taken at that point but until then it’s technically considered a missing piece already.
@@TWKillaBeastnot quite, bishop take knight attacks the queen and let's the rook free when you don't take it. The actual reason he doesn't take it is because of Bxa5. If the queen takes the rook would hang, and if the queen is moved you take on b5 and the pawns are a thorn in blacks position that you will probably have to sac the exchange back for eventually. Basically, you're sacrificing the exchange for powerful pawns.
I LOVE YOU MAGNUS
Its funny that every major chess channel now copied levis thumnails and titles.
He wouldn't have got 3850 if his opponent played like him, 3850 ELO. This is called Math.
Must do the procedure.
It's that Jonathan Taylor Thomas?
Love the weregonnalose reference right off the rip lol
5:18 QA4
Mr. Carlson... you CAN"T be pair up or even!
Nice tourny win this week : )
Brother in laws wife? Who makes a joke like that lol.
Who was the opponent?
Dude I’m happy when I get 1000 rating after a game.
Attack is the best defense
It does not happen to the best of us...
The greatest of all time
Kraminik: 🏃🏃🏃🏃🏃🏃⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡
Magnus Carlsen resemble Todd from Breaking Bad. Anyone else?
Why didnt black take rook a2, isnt that just a free piece?
Nvm
Magnus sounds good with his american accent
He's not a human being
And its actually blitz format, which makes it even more astonishing
blud slept w his sister
I am like the dumbest person at 950 😢
No
Interesting...
let's do the procedure
Does anyone find these numbers interesting 📯📯
3:43 fart
A 3850 elo fart
when magnus pushes the pawn at 4:16, why doesn't the opponent grab the free rook?
I am no expert, im only around 800-1k elo
But I think his opponent doesn't kill magnus's rook is because if his opponent kills magnus's rook, magnus will kill opponent's knight with his bishop which then targets the queen, and the opponent can't take the bishop because then magnus can kill the rook with his queen which is mate, so the opponent will move his queen to protect it from magnus's bishop, then magnus can push the passed pawn even forward threatening promotion, so to avoid all this his opponent just moved his rook so magnus's queen doesn't threat checkmate as now the rook also protects the back line (this is just my guess might be wrong)
@@justaero7852 This is how us 1k elo calculate instead of using chess notation
@@justaero7852really cool that you saw that at your elo, big props man thats high level vision
@johnbrandt9698 wow, no, it isn't. Obvious things
@@taneridle6299 You're right, as a 1643 elo myself, I'm too lazy to locate this and that and memorize it even 😂, glad I'm not the only one lol.
Chickbait bullshit
It still feels weird, knowing that he is not the reigning world champion.
haha trolling😂
scam, it can't be 3800 rating
damn he fart 3:44
He should be banned
This guy is a scam. He doesnt see lines quickly
777
Lol, every move was perfect
Brb let try 4,000 elo performance real quick 🥸