The Swing is a dedicated wave wing, it flags out impeccably, but isn't quite as comfortable pushing upwind, especially maxed or underpowered. The Flow is very versatile, it has very good flagged out behaviour and equally comfortable sheeted in blasting in it's wide range. The flow allows a wider range of use from a smaller quiver, the swing gives a better performance in a specific field. Neither would disappoint on the wave.
Neither of those 3 would disappoint! It would actually be quite hard to do a comparison as the pro's and con's on those 3 are almost the same. I think it would come down to rider preference on handle design and front/back hand pressure. Also whether you have a priority on discipline or looking for wider versatility. Welcome to give either of us a shout for a run down.
@@poseidonwatersportsuk What about build longevity? It's great to have a good wing but if it bags out after 15 uses then the performance drops like a brick?
Good question. Tough again as they are all top of the game and still perform equally well after a run of maxed out sessions. I think the best: Construction, seams and manufacture : easily ozone without question - it will stand the test of time. Anti stretch panels - XPS, its panel layout ages well. LE fabric abrasion durability - F-one uses a tougher style of Dacron that’s handles scrapes well.
Vs Swing fone? 🙏🏼
The Swing is a dedicated wave wing, it flags out impeccably, but isn't quite as comfortable pushing upwind, especially maxed or underpowered. The Flow is very versatile, it has very good flagged out behaviour and equally comfortable sheeted in blasting in it's wide range.
The flow allows a wider range of use from a smaller quiver, the swing gives a better performance in a specific field.
Neither would disappoint on the wave.
@@poseidonwatersportsukThanks ❤️
Think it sounds like a comparison is needed between the new offerings of F-One, Ozone and the older Armstrongs XPS ;-)
Neither of those 3 would disappoint!
It would actually be quite hard to do a comparison as the pro's and con's on those 3 are almost the same. I think it would come down to rider preference on handle design and front/back hand pressure. Also whether you have a priority on discipline or looking for wider versatility.
Welcome to give either of us a shout for a run down.
@@poseidonwatersportsuk What about build longevity? It's great to have a good wing but if it bags out after 15 uses then the performance drops like a brick?
Good question. Tough again as they are all top of the game and still perform equally well after a run of maxed out sessions.
I think the best:
Construction, seams and manufacture : easily ozone without question - it will stand the test of time.
Anti stretch panels - XPS, its panel layout ages well.
LE fabric abrasion durability - F-one uses a tougher style of Dacron that’s handles scrapes well.