Neither of those 3 would disappoint! It would actually be quite hard to do a comparison as the pro's and con's on those 3 are almost the same. I think it would come down to rider preference on handle design and front/back hand pressure. Also whether you have a priority on discipline or looking for wider versatility. Welcome to give either of us a shout for a run down.
@@poseidonwatersportsuk What about build longevity? It's great to have a good wing but if it bags out after 15 uses then the performance drops like a brick?
Good question. Tough again as they are all top of the game and still perform equally well after a run of maxed out sessions. I think the best: Construction, seams and manufacture : easily ozone without question - it will stand the test of time. Anti stretch panels - XPS, its panel layout ages well. LE fabric abrasion durability - F-one uses a tougher style of Dacron that’s handles scrapes well.
Think it sounds like a comparison is needed between the new offerings of F-One, Ozone and the older Armstrongs XPS ;-)
Neither of those 3 would disappoint!
It would actually be quite hard to do a comparison as the pro's and con's on those 3 are almost the same. I think it would come down to rider preference on handle design and front/back hand pressure. Also whether you have a priority on discipline or looking for wider versatility.
Welcome to give either of us a shout for a run down.
@@poseidonwatersportsuk What about build longevity? It's great to have a good wing but if it bags out after 15 uses then the performance drops like a brick?
Good question. Tough again as they are all top of the game and still perform equally well after a run of maxed out sessions.
I think the best:
Construction, seams and manufacture : easily ozone without question - it will stand the test of time.
Anti stretch panels - XPS, its panel layout ages well.
LE fabric abrasion durability - F-one uses a tougher style of Dacron that’s handles scrapes well.