Sam Raimi poured his heart and soul into his trilogy. Nobody has ever had the same intensity and dedication to a Spider-Man movie since Sam. Raimi was the best candidate for Spider-Man films because he truly understood the character, since he grew up reading Spider-Man comics among other ones, and he said himself that spidey was always one of his favorite superheroes. Raimi's Trilogy, for the most part, is a masterpiece is a cinematic masterpiece. Strong writing, good special effects, great or good performances from almost all the actors and the cultural impact of these films make it one of the best superhero trilogies as well as film trilogies in general.
You're right.He loved spider man more than any director.His love and passion for the trilogy is nothing compared to The DCEU and The MCU.The dark knight and The Sam raimi's Spider man is the best superhero trilogies of all time.
Spiderman 1 and 2 were masterpieces, it's just a shame that he didn't get to make this movie the way he wanted to. One thing that resonates in all of this trilogy, however, was deep characterisation, rather than the 1 dimensional cardboard cut outs of the newer films.
Can't really put all the blame on venom when he misunderstood his own spidermans motivations. There's no way spiderman would have kissed Gwen Stacy especially knowing MJ was right there watching
The honest truth of what happened to this film was this: Sam Raimi wrote a treatment with just Sandman and Goblin II, but the studio asked Sam to put Venom into the movie, but Sam refused, but the studio forced him and Sam did it to shut them up and made Vemon look bad to get back at the studio and hated the storyline he was forced to use. Sam Raimi already had a storyline that really worked, but the studio forced him to re-write it with what they wanted. It's the studios fault, not Sam Raimi.
RetroCruiser1962 ummm that’s not true the studio didn’t force him i forgot his name but there was this guy who forced him into bringing venom because he wasn’t thinking about the fans and that’s why we don’t have a Spiderman 4
your wrong sam rami was forced to put venom in the movie because the fans were begging him to so half in the movie they made him put in the movie what r u talking about
Producer Avi Arad convinced Sam to include Venom. Avi told the Sam that Venom had a strong fan base, so he included the character to please them and even began to appreciate the character himself based on how well Alvin Sargent wrote him in the screenplay.
Makes me feel, if Sam split this into two movies. Used Venom and Eddie in the 4th movie then it may have worked better, taking some of the weight off of the third one and moving the Eddie plot to the next one.
I agree with you 100% The first 2 spidermans were awesome! Sam knew what he was doing,stuck with his gut, and it worked! Their is no way Sam decided to make the 3rd spiderman movie the way it is, their is just no way! He had a plan and it got flipped on him by the idiots who forced him to add things he had no intention of adding. Sam Raimi is one of my favourite directors(The Evil Dead trilogy is amazing) So what I'm getting at is that he is to good of a film maker to ruin a trilogy.
4:30 and onward is particularly fascinating; note how Raimi pauses for such a long time before answering ‘I don’t know if I’ll do another film.’ And then mysteriously ends the conversation with the idea of ‘passing the torch onto another artist/director.’ Not only is this strangely prophetic in retrospect (even for 2007) but it also seems to hint that Raimi was clearly burned out from the series and by the bad taste the idiots in charge at Sony left in his mouth, even though he did try to craft a fourth chapter (once again Sony meddled in his ideas way too much and caused him to call it quits so as to avoid repeating his negative experiences on spiderman 3). On the other hand I really hope Sony has wised up and apologized to Raimi by allowing him to finally do a fourth film (especially with all this hype concerning his dr strange 2, the upcoming morbious spidery poster reference, and particularly the recent return of JK Simmons’ J Jonah Jameson(!!!) from last year’s far from home seems to only confirm something is developing very soon.
In the 1990s, Sam Raimi had planned to direct Thor under Twentieth Century Fox, but the studio passed on the project. Raimi would later direct a trilogy of films on Spider-Man and Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (2022), two other Marvel Comics superheroes.
Alexander Walason theres a chance right now, with raimi directing the doctor strange multiverse, and in the morbius trailer, Tobey’s spiderman is graffitied in the backround.
3:40 This is why Venom didn’t work. The studio wanted to include him but Sam didn’t fully understand the character. It’s not his fault, it’s just that when you have a script already made and a change is made you have to quickly make changes that ultimately hurt the story if they aren’t natural. I feel if Sam studied the character in preparation for a 4th film then he could have totally done a great Venom story line. As someone who aspiring to be a worrier I get how Rami feels. The best character writing comes when you know the character inside and out to the point you can make their choices in the plot feel natural. If you don’t full understand a character then that character will only weigh down the plot.
:35 seconds he says he knows who Toby's spiderman is yet there's no way he'd ever cheat on MJ, And that's where the movie lost me when I rewatched it recently.
I honestly dont blame SR for the job he did with Spiderman 3, it was alot of pressure really approaching a story with Venom and the black symbiote Spiderman and then reintroducing stories with Uncle Ben's murderer and Harry Osborn's baggage against Peter in a new an interesting way. Too many awesome things happened for me to hate it, it was really and hard to go back and watch the first two once I saw 3. I think he shouldve exapanded the story for Spidey 3 in two movies rather than cram everything in one, Raimi just bit off more than what was asked of him. Still one of my fave superhero movies, silly-over-the-top-humor n all.
I don't blame Sam Raimi for fucking up Spider-man 3. It was the executives who pressured him into doing the whole symbiote/Venom storyline. Eddie Brock was a whining little pussy and Venom was no better. You could tell it was written into the story at the last minute. What ruined the entire film for me was making Sandman uncle Ben's killer. What a crock of shit.
Hmm, yes, retconning Flint into that was a bit hokey. Might also have been due to introducing Venom since that meant they had fewer screen time to really give Peter and Flint a way to organically developed relationship / enmity
I don’t get why Sandman being Uncle Bens killer is bad, it’s still peters fault for his death, if peter had stopped the robber then the robber would have not spooked Flint into killing Uncle Ben, it makes Flints and Peters story stronger and Uncle Bens story end in a beautiful way at the end of Spider-Man 3 with Peter forgiving Flint.
Spider Man 3 gets way too much unnecessary hate. It was a great film. Yes the whole symbiote dance thing was dumb looking but it made sense for the story they were going for.
He was also in Spider-man in the newspaper office, one of the funniest parts of the series him and j jonah jameson ruclips.net/video/b5G9reMt5FE/видео.html
Spiderman 3 sucked because Sam was pressured to listen to the fans (even then, it still looked/sounded great, and the fight scenes were well done). Drag Me To Hell was an incredible horror film, the first one that's genuinley scared me in years.
Sam Raimi you're were geniousious but i am angry with him 😡💢 why the hell left Spiderman 4 project in between Spider-Man 3 was not a bad people are now realising how much masterpiece the was there no fault you but with was with Sony , why you let them takeover the franchise Completely ruining your upcoming trilogy of ours.... Hope soo you will not with multiverse of madness or far from home but with Spiderman 🕸️🕷️ 4
BUT IN THE COMIC BOOKS THEIR ARE OTHER PEOPLE WHO WEAR THE VENOM SUIT SO ITS POSSIBLE. BUT ITS MORE LIKELY THEY WILL MAKE SO THE SYMBIOTE CLONES ITSELF tO MAKE CARNAGE AND THEN IT BONDS WITH CASSIDY.
no offence to any raimi fans but i dont like the way he potrayed venom, i hope (if the cast comes back) he didnt kill off venom and keeps him for the next one
Sam Raimi poured his heart and soul into his trilogy. Nobody has ever had the same intensity and dedication to a Spider-Man movie since Sam. Raimi was the best candidate for Spider-Man films because he truly understood the character, since he grew up reading Spider-Man comics among other ones, and he said himself that spidey was always one of his favorite superheroes.
Raimi's Trilogy, for the most part, is a masterpiece is a cinematic masterpiece. Strong writing, good special effects, great or good performances from almost all the actors and the cultural impact of these films make it one of the best superhero trilogies as well as film trilogies in general.
You're right.He loved spider man more than any director.His love and passion for the trilogy is nothing compared to The DCEU and The MCU.The dark knight and The Sam raimi's Spider man is the best superhero trilogies of all time.
Sam raimi trilogy is the best
Fuckin RIGHT!
then Avi Arad came along on Spiderman 3 and shit happened
Spiderman 1 and 2 were masterpieces, it's just a shame that he didn't get to make this movie the way he wanted to. One thing that resonates in all of this trilogy, however, was deep characterisation, rather than the 1 dimensional cardboard cut outs of the newer films.
Avi arad was involved in the third one
Wayne and 2. But apparently not as much
Can't really put all the blame on venom when he misunderstood his own spidermans motivations. There's no way spiderman would have kissed Gwen Stacy especially knowing MJ was right there watching
The honest truth of what happened to this film was this: Sam Raimi wrote a treatment with just Sandman and Goblin II, but the studio asked Sam to put Venom into the movie, but Sam refused, but the studio forced him and Sam did it to shut them up and made Vemon look bad to get back at the studio and hated the storyline he was forced to use. Sam Raimi already had a storyline that really worked, but the studio forced him to re-write it with what they wanted. It's the studios fault, not Sam Raimi.
RetroCruiser1962 ummm that’s not true the studio didn’t force him i forgot his name but there was this guy who forced him into bringing venom because he wasn’t thinking about the fans and that’s why we don’t have a Spiderman 4
And a good Spiderman 3
your wrong sam rami was forced to put venom in the movie because the fans were begging him to so half in the movie they made him put in the movie what r u talking about
No it was Avi Arad who forced him and he even said it in an interview u can go check it out if u don’t believe me
@@marveleeditsmarveledits3379 The fans were not asking for anything. It was Avi Arad that forced Venom down our throat and Sam's as well
Sam raimi the legend
Sam Raimi is an amazing director...
Producer Avi Arad convinced Sam to include Venom. Avi told the Sam that Venom had a strong fan base, so he included the character to please them and even began to appreciate the character himself based on how well Alvin Sargent wrote him in the screenplay.
Makes me feel, if Sam split this into two movies. Used Venom and Eddie in the 4th movie then it may have worked better, taking some of the weight off of the third one and moving the Eddie plot to the next one.
I fucking love Spider-Man 3, still think it’s a great trilogy
He's so humble for a talented director.
I agree with you 100% The first 2 spidermans were awesome! Sam knew what he was doing,stuck with his gut, and it worked! Their is no way Sam decided to make the 3rd spiderman movie the way it is, their is just no way! He had a plan and it got flipped on him by the idiots who forced him to add things he had no intention of adding. Sam Raimi is one of my favourite directors(The Evil Dead trilogy is amazing) So what I'm getting at is that he is to good of a film maker to ruin a trilogy.
4:30 and onward is particularly fascinating; note how Raimi pauses for such a long time before answering ‘I don’t know if I’ll do another film.’ And then mysteriously ends the conversation with the idea of ‘passing the torch onto another artist/director.’ Not only is this strangely prophetic in retrospect (even for 2007) but it also seems to hint that Raimi was clearly burned out from the series and by the bad taste the idiots in charge at Sony left in his mouth, even though he did try to craft a fourth chapter (once again Sony meddled in his ideas way too much and caused him to call it quits so as to avoid repeating his negative experiences on spiderman 3).
On the other hand I really hope Sony has wised up and apologized to Raimi by allowing him to finally do a fourth film (especially with all this hype concerning his dr strange 2, the upcoming morbious spidery poster reference, and particularly the recent return of JK Simmons’ J Jonah Jameson(!!!) from last year’s far from home seems to only confirm something is developing very soon.
In the 1990s, Sam Raimi had planned to direct Thor under Twentieth Century Fox, but the studio passed on the project. Raimi would later direct a trilogy of films on Spider-Man and Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (2022), two other Marvel Comics superheroes.
i became sam fan after evil dead 2.ur gr8 sam love u
This video aged very well
Why? Sam Raimi did an amazing job on Spider-Man 3. I HOPE HOPE HOPE HOPE he returns.
12 years later this sadly never happened
@@Creativityzealot unfortunately.
Alexander Walason theres a chance right now, with raimi directing the doctor strange multiverse, and in the morbius trailer, Tobey’s spiderman is graffitied in the backround.
@@spidermanwebslinge after 12 years damn i feel your pain dawg dont worry one day
Might be happening now
3:40 This is why Venom didn’t work. The studio wanted to include him but Sam didn’t fully understand the character. It’s not his fault, it’s just that when you have a script already made and a change is made you have to quickly make changes that ultimately hurt the story if they aren’t natural. I feel if Sam studied the character in preparation for a 4th film then he could have totally done a great Venom story line. As someone who aspiring to be a worrier I get how Rami feels. The best character writing comes when you know the character inside and out to the point you can make their choices in the plot feel natural. If you don’t full understand a character then that character will only weigh down the plot.
:35 seconds he says he knows who Toby's spiderman is yet there's no way he'd ever cheat on MJ, And that's where the movie lost me when I rewatched it recently.
groovy
I honestly dont blame SR for the job he did with Spiderman 3, it was alot of pressure really approaching a story with Venom and the black symbiote Spiderman and then reintroducing stories with Uncle Ben's murderer and Harry Osborn's baggage against Peter in a new an interesting way. Too many awesome things happened for me to hate it, it was really and hard to go back and watch the first two once I saw 3. I think he shouldve exapanded the story for Spidey 3 in two movies rather than cram everything in one, Raimi just bit off more than what was asked of him. Still one of my fave superhero movies, silly-over-the-top-humor n all.
Please make spiderman 4
Raimi looks like Michael Scott in the thumbnail
I don't blame Sam Raimi for fucking up Spider-man 3. It was the executives who pressured him into doing the whole symbiote/Venom storyline. Eddie Brock was a whining little pussy and Venom was no better. You could tell it was written into the story at the last minute. What ruined the entire film for me was making Sandman uncle Ben's killer. What a crock of shit.
Why thats pretty good because he got his powers later
Hmm, yes, retconning Flint into that was a bit hokey. Might also have been due to introducing Venom since that meant they had fewer screen time to really give Peter and Flint a way to organically developed relationship / enmity
I don’t get why Sandman being Uncle Bens killer is bad, it’s still peters fault for his death, if peter had stopped the robber then the robber would have not spooked Flint into killing Uncle Ben, it makes Flints and Peters story stronger and Uncle Bens story end in a beautiful way at the end of Spider-Man 3 with Peter forgiving Flint.
Spider Man 3 gets way too much unnecessary hate. It was a great film. Yes the whole symbiote dance thing was dumb looking but it made sense for the story they were going for.
Sam raimi is Ted raimi's brother (the one who was Joker from Xena)in fact he looks a little bit like Ted ^_^ they both are greats!!!
He was also in Spider-man in the newspaper office, one of the funniest parts of the series him and j jonah jameson ruclips.net/video/b5G9reMt5FE/видео.html
oo this one is better ruclips.net/video/j9ym1e3gjxs/видео.html
@@hughmcgown thank you 😊👍🏻
Sam just announced World of Warcraft movie!!
Raimi, We need Evil Dead IV, spider man can wait.
No
dont forget about the little piece of venom peter gave to doc connors to studie.
I know right.
Spiderman 3 sucked because Sam was pressured to listen to the fans (even then, it still looked/sounded great, and the fight scenes were well done). Drag Me To Hell was an incredible horror film, the first one that's genuinley scared me in years.
PLEASE IMPORTANT:
does anybody know how can i contact sam raimi?
Why do u want that?
@@lpmmxvii7422 because i wanted to pitch him spiderman 4 but it´s too late now thanks for nothing
@@poncho630 wtf u still using the same account 🤣🤣🤣
That could have been awesome. Spider-Man 4 sounds like an amazing idea! Somehow, they never thought of that one.
please this is aliving or dead situation, is there any way to contact him?
Do you still wanna contact Sam Raimi?
@@trevorphilips9065 he is probably dead now
@@tiago2189 I just realized I misspelled Sam Raimi's last name
@@trevorphilips9065 unfortunately i wasn't able to contact him and i passed away due to anal cancer on february 31 2001
@@tiago2189 i did but if you do have a way to contact him i'd consider coming back to life
Forget Spider-Man Raimi!!!! make Evil Dead 4!.
Sam Raimi you're were geniousious but i am angry with him 😡💢 why the hell left Spiderman 4 project in between Spider-Man 3 was not a bad people are now realising how much masterpiece the was there no fault you but with was with Sony , why you let them takeover the franchise Completely ruining your upcoming trilogy of ours.... Hope soo you will not with multiverse of madness or far from home but with Spiderman 🕸️🕷️ 4
After so many shitty mcu flicks SM3 looks sooo much better than these
i prefer the evil dead trilogy
You should of made harry osborn vemon
man i wish they didnt fumble this movie
they killed off venom !!! you bastards
BUT IN THE COMIC BOOKS THEIR ARE OTHER PEOPLE WHO WEAR THE VENOM SUIT SO ITS POSSIBLE. BUT ITS MORE LIKELY THEY WILL MAKE SO THE SYMBIOTE CLONES ITSELF tO MAKE CARNAGE AND THEN IT BONDS WITH CASSIDY.
i think he should play mathew broderick
no offence to any raimi fans but i dont like the way he potrayed venom, i hope (if the cast comes back) he didnt kill off venom and keeps him for the next one
But Spider Man 3 is still worse in his 3 movies
they succeeded in messing up a great potential for venom
You could do Spider-Man 4. But you Sam Rami you are so insecuredededereereeree
he didnt care about the comic fans... he wouldnt kill vvenom so fast almost every comic fan loves venom