Why Mazda’s Worst Engine Is Also Their Best Engine | The Rotary Engine

People usually have mixed opinions when it comes to the Rotary engine. Because the Rotary engine is just a different engine compared to a traditional piston engine. It burned oil by design, it revved up to 9000rpm and it just had fewer parts.
It also had a lot of negative drawbacks but despite all of that, Mazda wouldn't give up on the Rotary engine.
So, even when they break down way sooner than a piston engine, why do car enthusiasts still go back to the it? Even if they know they would have to rebuild it after a few years. Why do they put up with it?
In this video I discuss the truth about the Mazda's rotary engine and it's history.
*This Video Is For Education Purposes*
- Share this video.
- Like and thumbs up.
- Subscribe for more
For Business Enquiries:
Email: [e-mail]
DISCLAIMER:
Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing."
The materials are used for illustrative and exemplification reasons, also quoting in order to recombine elements to make a new work.

[@tatianapanea7565]

Mazda still had major problems in the 70's with the rotary and they almost went broke. Engines failed in all RX models. RX-8 has many failures also with some people going through 2 or 3 engines.

[@StraightLineSpeed]

True, I sometimes wonder what if enough research and development could have gone towards the rotary engine, maybe they could have tackled all the issues. But then again, emissions hehe..