The Puma is the only tank in this list that can programm shells fully automatically with an electromagnetic impulse with an device at the end of the barrel. So if an high explosive shell leaves the barrel its detonation distance is programmed without tve crew has to do something
Russia: Let us make a 48 tons heavy Main - Battle - Tank 🧚♀️🧚♀️ Germany: That' s Kindergarten!....let us make a 43 tons light Infantery - Fighting - Vehicle 😂😂
K21 and CV90 are most cost-effective IFV! Both of them have proper specs, and proper cost. Especially, K21 can up-gun 105mm and 120m, so it can be used as Light-tank.
Yep, and the CV-90, can take, 30 mm, 35 mm, 40 mm, 105 mm, 120 mm, and the Dangerous one, two long barrels firing 120 mm , standard and not standard mortar shells, longer than , a standard mortar, in a way, 12-14 shells are going buoouum at the same time on the same target. CV 90 AMOS. ( Don't worry about it, if you drive a T-14, He he he he).
From point of View of cool , i like IT all, but practicaly 1 kurganet-25, 2 Namer based in Merkava ,3 Puma ,4 T-15 armata but only survive working after is hit by a mbt once from 1kilometer, only by cost and a very good protection will be turkish Tulpar with just 1.2 milion dollars could buy with just 100 millions dollars an army.
k21 was reborn "AS21 RedBack" The AS21 has increased armor and eliminated water from the K21, and has the ability to modularly replace antitank missiles and anti-aircraft missiles with multi-options. Active defense is optional.
Многие из рейтинга имеют цену больше чем Т-72б3 и почти равную цене Т-90, но против них у них нет ни одного шанса... А немецкая "Пума" за 12 миллионов - это у меня даже комментариев нет... Puma vs. 3-4 x T-72б3...
Turkish one cost $1.2 million, German 12 million. Huge difference in cost. Unknown difference in effectiveness. However, since you can buy ten times as many Turkish Tulpar's for the same money as one German Puma, I would think that you could be much more effective with so many more Turkish Tulpar's
Actually it's not so, if you consider the cost of the machine alone maybe yes, but for every machine you have to consider the crew, maintenance and so on. If you can achieve a better result with less of them is better :)
great vehicles ,,they do not have a flap on the sides to protect soldiers when they come out ,or has the vehicle advancers,a flap mounted on the side ,on a pivot would protect the soldier ,perhaps a flap 6 foot long with rifle slots,this would also give the vehicle extra protection
TheDarthDesigner on a side note im still working on my own personal mini Lego Star destroyer videos and hopefully i will have a how to build video of my mini Lego Star destroyer called project 9878
Good video, I think the BMP 3 may were in a higher place, is the best armed IFV, the basic BMP-3 had 18 tons the lowest weight between all of the vehicles of the list, the modernized BMP-3 had 23 tons that you say, but the modernized BMP-3 added the kaktus ERA package that can withstand 30 mm autocannon all around the vehicle, also can withstand rpg shots and light cannons shots. Without adding weight instead the other vehicles, if you add weight you add cost of operation. The BMP-3 has one of the lowest cost per unit only had about 1.500.000$, the basic BMP-3 800000$ without being modernized. The BMP-3 is one the best tracked IFV in the world.
Stats for the Warrior are wrong. The weapons are a 30mm RARDEN cannon and a Hughes helicopter 7.62mm chaingun. They are considering updating to a 40mm cannon and a new turret over the next few years to extend the life of the vehicle.
I think you need to update your informations :) The new gun is not in "consideration" but the contract was awarded in 2004 and the first MTIP Warrior delivered in 2006.....12 years ago! :D The extend life program (called WCSP) to extend the warrior life until 2040was awarded in 2011 by Lockheed Martin, also this time, many years ago :)
I would like a tank that has a turret that can move up and down the centre length of the vehicle and also be able to turn 360 degrees no matter what position.
The video you're showing for ZBD-04 is wrong. The parade one is ZBD-04a, but the one passing through obstacles is called ZBD-03, which is a light IFV intended for paratroopers.
Ok in the video I forgot to edit it while in the title top10 sounds better than top13 and I did it on purpose...just like the other 3 are honourable mentions like you said :D In a first moment it would be a top15 but I didn't find something good enough to be in the top so...well...we have just 13 of them xD
The German one cost 12 million? The average was 3 to 6 million for the rest, this seems way to expensive. One of them only cost 1.2 million and it was way inside the top 10. Plus the Russian version is way to new to be number 1, you should be going on battle tested,service,cost,men carried,armour,speed! Not the newest and who has the biggest gun! That's what tanks are for, these should be quick with good armour and a light weapon with plenty of room for at least 8 fully armed soldiers that can be deployed at the front or behind enemy lines then the vehicle makes a quick exit.
The German IFV cost is under discussion with German people, with the new information it seems the price is cheaper (maybe around 8M) but difficult to find out. "you should be going on battle tested," Did you at least read the criteria of the list or the first 15 seconds of the video?
Некорректно сравнивать изначально конструкционные боевые машины пехоты (как советская БМП первая в Мире машина этого класса!) с |VS боевыми машинами построенные на базе танков!
Why is the ASCOD 2 so low on the list? I mean it beat the cv90 in the FRES programm. OK this also had to do with the requierments like big payload capacity for example but they both have similar protection, firepower and mobility.
$12 million for the German one, $1,2 million for the Turkish, is it really 10 times better, or would one be better off with 10 times more IFV by buying the cheaper.
The Tulpar does not even have Anti-tank missile so it can not fight heavy tanks. At least the Puma can be fittet with Anti-tank missiles to destroy heavy tanks, which the Tulpar can not do. The Tulpar would be completely useless against enemy heavy tanks. Also, the Puma has much better protection with heavy ERA. The Tulpar does not have any side protection at all, it could not even survive a direct RPG hit. While the Puma can survive multple direct RPG and even missile hits, whereas the Tulpar would be destroyed immediately. If you want to have an effective vehicle that can protetc and support the infanrty, buy the Puma. If you want to have a useless vehicle that can not survive a RPG hit (and loses many soldiers), buy the Tulpar. It's your choice
@@MsSomeonenew There will not be another all out war like WW2 again because nuclear weapons. Today a modern tank can easilly take out 10 outdated tanks. Look at the gulf war 1991. A few Abrams and Challengers destroyed hundreds of tanks without a single loss. The Tulpar doesn't even have missiles so it can not destroy a tank. The Puma does have missiles so it can destroy enemy tanks. Also the Tulpar is very weak armored, so it can not survive a RPG or missile hit, it will be destroyed after the first hit and the soldiers dead. The Puma has very good protection with heavy armor so it has a good chance to survive multiple RPG and missile hits and keep on fighting. The Puma can take out many Tulpas but the Tulpar can not take out a single Puma.
@@MsSomeonenew Germany already has 250 Puma plus 100 more are being built this year. And how many Tulpars Turkey has? Only one single prototype LOL! Turkey is poor country it can never outproduce Germany! Turkey still uses most tanks from Germany Leopard tanks! Because Turkey has no own tank production. The Altay will only start in 2021! lol
Yes the Namer is a modified merkava hull (4th gen usually) with just a different turret. It's really not so much different from merkava but it's best role is the APC one (in that list will be higher)
TheDarthDesigner It just needs a better engine. By the way can you modify your specifications slightly? I mean you should display the engine also in horsepowers.
To be fair I usually use the international system only but I think for the engine I can do an exception. My only doubt is...if I change that parameter showing both systems other people will ask me to change everything else too? In that case would be a problem :S But for the engine I prefer horsepower too because is more common even in countries that follow the IMS
какая разница в каком порядке видео составленно, ведь интересно просто посмотреть и сравнить различные подходы к определённому виду техники, а те кто срётся в чате ни кто иной как диванный спецыалист со злобой в мозгу, видимо от жизни хорошей..
TheDarthDesigner as i know altay is more heawy armored version of k2(k2 has 6 track, altay has 7 for extra weight) and aiming system is good enough too(it will use active protection systems too) i think altay is goingto be good(altay has not aouto loader for extra ammunution and for less chance of ammorack)
Cihat Keles That is yet to be seen. Turkey should modify their ALTAY design because it doesn't look so modern right now to me. On my opinion in order for a tank to be in the top 5 it needs to be a whole new generation or a whole new innovative design or a platform. Just like the T-14. If not then the Merkava 4. Designs like T-72, M1 Abrams, T-80 and so on are modified to modern standards so they can keep up next to the modern warfare. Not the best tanks and not all of them surpass the top 5 but still effective enough. However the current ALTAY design is also a modification of another tank from another country. Turkey needs a whole new tank platform to keep up with the top 5 tanks. Sorry, I can't really explain my point, hopefully you get it.
ZRB BG yes i understand you :) but its impossible . turkey have not ever builded any kind of tank . turkey has not any knowledge about tanks , turks can not build any platform(for now). because of that turks used korean k2 to build their own tank , think it like a helper map . turks builded altay but its based on k2 (nearly %90-95 of tanks is diffrent, but they have %5-10 same systems) altay is based on k2 and altay is more modernized/changed version of k2(k2 is one of the worlds best tanks)
Tank Puma germany bagus juga laras meriam menggunakan stabiliser konstan walaupun tank nya bergerak bebas, berarti tank dalam keadaan bergerak bebas dapat langsung menembak target dengan keakurasian yaang tinggi. Tank puma ini sulit jadi sasaran tembak karna bergerak untuk bertahan dan bergerak untuk menyerang. Bagus sekali konsepnya.
Ya Dieu, je m'emporte vraiment dans la perte du plaisir que tu as donné, de la santé changeante que tu as, de la part de ton Fils-Majesté qui vient soudainement et de toutes tes douleurs, Ameen
The namer offers the same protection of Merkava and the ERA is part of it just like the TROPHY APS. (from 2016 if I remember well) - The turret is unmanned....... You can just watch the video and stop at 2:31. Here you can clearly see there are no hatch on it!
Thx for your answer About the turret unmanned I was not talking about the Namer but the Ascod And about ERA, you mean that APS is including as an ERA thing ? It's not
Warriors don't have 40mm cannons yet. That's still in testing. It's still a 30mm pea shooter. We can fire 3 rounds then have to reload another 3 or 6 rounds then a full reload which takes much longer. Meanwhile the Americans can spit the same rounds out of a mini gun mounted to an airplane haha
I play music only when the original video have commentary or a copyrighted music actually, when possible I always leave the original sound. Not only it's easier for me to make the video (less work) but even better...the sound of the machine is much better than music
Because the youtube algorithm that doesn't like the "top13" It isn't better to have 3 bonus machine and a longer and more detailed video? I've given extra work and it's even a problem? :/
@@DarthDesigner - I see, but it's pathetic to what extent superstious people will go to avoid the number 13 at all costs...! This is the 21st century, not the Middle Age !
Поправка. "Армата" - это название унифицированной боевой платформы, а не наименование единицы техники. Всё таки, ставить Т-15 в один ряд с Курганцем, Бредли или Пумой не правильно. Т-15 по бронированию является больше танком, чем БМП.
Armata on 1st place? Shouldn't you take only existing machine? Purple unicorn with magic power it is quite good for army, and like armata it has good specification ;-D Yes- i am joking, but You start.
The Puma is the only tank in this list that can programm shells fully automatically with an electromagnetic impulse with an device at the end of the barrel. So if an high explosive shell leaves the barrel its detonation distance is programmed without tve crew has to do something
Russia: Let us make a 48 tons heavy Main - Battle - Tank 🧚♀️🧚♀️
Germany: That' s Kindergarten!....let us make a 43 tons light Infantery - Fighting - Vehicle 😂😂
Russia: Hold my 48 tons, T15 Armata IFV.
When you install 7th roadwheel and 57mm auto cannon, you know that mofo is heavy as fuck.
K21 and CV90 are most cost-effective IFV! Both of them have proper specs, and proper cost.
Especially, K21 can up-gun 105mm and 120m, so it can be used as Light-tank.
Yep, and the CV-90, can take, 30 mm, 35 mm, 40 mm, 105 mm, 120 mm, and the Dangerous one, two long barrels firing 120 mm , standard and not standard mortar shells, longer than , a standard mortar, in a way, 12-14 shells are going buoouum at the same time on the same target. CV 90 AMOS. ( Don't worry about it, if you drive a T-14, He he he he).
don't need 120mm gun if you can have 150mm Spike missile ;)
No..K21 can't replace tank. It's armor protection is not enough to replace tank. K21 can destroy the tank but it is still IFV.
South Korean may offer 105mm & 120mm version of K21 for other country but South Korean Army will never employ it as the light tank.
Russian vehicles can up-gun 125mm too.
From point of View of cool , i like IT all, but practicaly 1 kurganet-25, 2 Namer based in Merkava ,3 Puma ,4 T-15 armata but only survive working after is hit by a mbt once from 1kilometer, only by cost and a very good protection will be turkish Tulpar with just 1.2 milion dollars could buy with just 100 millions dollars an army.
i think this channel's ranking system is most reliable of all military ranking in youtube
Thank you!!!!!
The Best Of TRACKED
Os melhores apc do mundo militar the Best Of tracked infantry
Top 10 Best tracked infantry os melhores
I'm serving on a puma as main gunner pretty sick Mashine
German tank engeneering still very NAIS
The stabilizer on the German Puma makes the vehicle amazing in your video.
I agree! It's beautiful to watch! :D
Wenping
From Africa my pick is the tuplar Turkish
I think Tulpar like a Audi automobile
Nomad I think it is the best looking... I hope it has the performance to go with it’s looks!
These are cool but you should do a Main Battle Tank video. The m1a2, challenger 2 and leopard 2a7 are beasts. Nice video though
k21 was reborn "AS21 RedBack"
The AS21 has increased armor and eliminated water from the K21, and has the ability to modularly replace antitank missiles and anti-aircraft missiles with multi-options.
Active defense is optional.
Top 10 ifv tracked
I like how APCs turned into Light Tanks with extra seating.
:D
Armata class of military hardware looks pretty interesting. Everything and the kitchen sink put into those monsters.
*_I was wondering if you were gonna do one about tracked IFVs. It's great mang, love how you've covered this twice meow. :D_*
Yes finally it's arrived eheheh Better late than never......right? :D
7:00 'Welcome to the Hydraulic Press Channel'
Os Melhores tracked the Best Of
Многие из рейтинга имеют цену больше чем Т-72б3 и почти равную цене Т-90, но против них у них нет ни одного шанса... А немецкая "Пума" за 12 миллионов - это у меня даже комментариев нет... Puma vs. 3-4 x T-72б3...
We are inside.From TURKEY.
Tulpar = $1.200.000 Nice price
The cheapest
You may have to add the Rheinmetall „Lynx“ (Germany)
I will :)
@MICHÉL Well we have two versions KF-31 and KF-41...i think the KF-41 is good as the Puma...
Turkish one cost $1.2 million, German 12 million. Huge difference in cost. Unknown difference in effectiveness. However, since you can buy ten times as many Turkish Tulpar's for the same money as one German Puma, I would think that you could be much more effective with so many more Turkish Tulpar's
Actually it's not so, if you consider the cost of the machine alone maybe yes, but for every machine you have to consider the crew, maintenance and so on. If you can achieve a better result with less of them is better :)
tulpar is amazing
great vehicles ,,they do not have a flap on the sides to protect soldiers when they come out ,or has the vehicle advancers,a flap mounted on the side ,on a pivot would protect the soldier ,perhaps a flap 6 foot long with rifle slots,this would also give the vehicle extra protection
The BMP-1 is the all time best!
Los alemanes y los rusos comparten el mismo gusto, y fabrican calidad en armamento, sin duda son los mejores 💪💪💪💪
Awesome video my friend keep up the good work
Thank you so much :D
TheDarthDesigner on a side note im still working on my own personal mini Lego Star destroyer videos and hopefully i will have a how to build video of my mini Lego Star destroyer called project 9878
CV-90 stronk
Mårten Savela ikr its the tank among the IFV
頭文字D！
Good video, I think the BMP 3 may were in a higher place, is the best armed IFV, the basic BMP-3 had 18 tons the lowest weight between all of the vehicles of the list, the modernized BMP-3 had 23 tons that you say, but the modernized BMP-3 added the kaktus ERA package that can withstand 30 mm autocannon all around the vehicle, also can withstand rpg shots and light cannons shots.
Without adding weight instead the other vehicles, if you add weight you add cost of operation.
The BMP-3 has one of the lowest cost per unit only had about 1.500.000$, the basic BMP-3 800000$ without being modernized.
The BMP-3 is one the best tracked IFV in the world.
Stats for the Warrior are wrong. The weapons are a 30mm RARDEN cannon and a Hughes helicopter 7.62mm chaingun. They are considering updating to a 40mm cannon and a new turret over the next few years to extend the life of the vehicle.
I think you need to update your informations :)
The new gun is not in "consideration" but the contract was awarded in 2004 and the first MTIP Warrior delivered in 2006.....12 years ago! :D
The extend life program (called WCSP) to extend the warrior life until 2040was awarded in 2011 by Lockheed Martin, also this time, many years ago :)
Puma the Best!)
Puma lynx is the best
I would like a tank that has a turret that can move up and down the centre length of the vehicle and also be able to turn 360 degrees no matter what position.
the turret of most modern day tanks are susceptible to be struck when turning to re position on a new fire line 'a sitting duck'
You are behaving like jackals in the west! But the jackals laugh until Bear growled.
Mmmmmmm 🤔 ok
Isn't the advertised 40mm gun for the Warrior a future upgrade, and that current ones use the 30mm?
amazing military technology
I think the Warrior, #13 has a Rarden gun variant at 30mm.
Yes you're right
The video you're showing for ZBD-04 is wrong. The parade one is ZBD-04a, but the one passing through obstacles is called ZBD-03, which is a light IFV intended for paratroopers.
As written, the images are only demonstrative
The Type 89's black smoke is totally not going attract any enemy at all?
What Top 10? They are 13. Or these are the mentions?
Ok in the video I forgot to edit it while in the title top10 sounds better than top13 and I did it on purpose...just like the other 3 are honourable mentions like you said :D
In a first moment it would be a top15 but I didn't find something good enough to be in the top so...well...we have just 13 of them xD
TheDarthDesigner Oh okay, I understand
I like the ASCOD Pizarro. Looking foward ASCOD 3.
Compare the costs of BMP-3 to Kurganets-25 to Turkish Tulpar: Something is wrong!
The German one cost 12 million? The average was 3 to 6 million for the rest, this seems way to expensive. One of them only cost 1.2 million and it was way inside the top 10. Plus the Russian version is way to new to be number 1, you should be going on battle tested,service,cost,men carried,armour,speed! Not the newest and who has the biggest gun! That's what tanks are for, these should be quick with good armour and a light weapon with plenty of room for at least 8 fully armed soldiers that can be deployed at the front or behind enemy lines then the vehicle makes a quick exit.
The German IFV cost is under discussion with German people, with the new information it seems the price is cheaper (maybe around 8M) but difficult to find out.
"you should be going on battle tested,"
Did you at least read the criteria of the list or the first 15 seconds of the video?
Strange top... the amx 10-P could be on the 6th place and you forgot the VBCI !
But my favorite is the Puma...
The VBCI is not TRACKED :) You can find it in the WHEELED list!
@@DarthDesigner sure, i saw the other video ! And thumb up !
i liked the Swedish design . from S-Africa
k21 is best
Tulpar hepsinden şekil duruyor lan.
??
ALLAH DEVLETİMİZE ZEVAL VERMESİN KARDEŞİM
@@umitfurkan2079 have u seen redback K21?
Некорректно сравнивать изначально конструкционные боевые машины пехоты (как советская БМП первая в Мире машина этого класса!) с |VS боевыми машинами построенные на базе танков!
Why is the ASCOD 2 so low on the list? I mean it beat the cv90 in the FRES programm. OK this also had to do with the requierments like big payload capacity for example but they both have similar protection, firepower and mobility.
placeholder yes, no sense that BMP or Bradley was higher than ASCOD.
M2 Bradley: Since Version A2 it can't swim!!!
Ah the bradley one of my favourite ifvs the swedish ifv looks badass
Good choice :D
The T15 Armata is a monster of militar design and tecnology
$12 million for the German one, $1,2 million for the Turkish, is it really 10 times better, or would one be better off with 10 times more IFV by buying the cheaper.
The Tulpar does not even have Anti-tank missile so it can not fight heavy tanks. At least the Puma can be fittet with Anti-tank missiles to destroy heavy tanks, which the Tulpar can not do. The Tulpar would be completely useless against enemy heavy tanks.
Also, the Puma has much better protection with heavy ERA. The Tulpar does not have any side protection at all, it could not even survive a direct RPG hit. While the Puma can survive multple direct RPG and even missile hits, whereas the Tulpar would be destroyed immediately.
If you want to have an effective vehicle that can protetc and support the infanrty, buy the Puma.
If you want to have a useless vehicle that can not survive a RPG hit (and loses many soldiers), buy the Tulpar.
It's your choice
Also the price in this video is not correct, it's more like 6-8 million (which is still expensive but not as much as in the video)
In all out warfare cheaper was ultimately better, since even your 10x better tank usually can't take on 10 tanks.
@@MsSomeonenew There will not be another all out war like WW2 again because nuclear weapons. Today a modern tank can easilly take out 10 outdated tanks. Look at the gulf war 1991. A few Abrams and Challengers destroyed hundreds of tanks without a single loss. The Tulpar doesn't even have missiles so it can not destroy a tank. The Puma does have missiles so it can destroy enemy tanks. Also the Tulpar is very weak armored, so it can not survive a RPG or missile hit, it will be destroyed after the first hit and the soldiers dead. The Puma has very good protection with heavy armor so it has a good chance to survive multiple RPG and missile hits and keep on fighting. The Puma can take out many Tulpas but the Tulpar can not take out a single Puma.
@@MsSomeonenew Germany already has 250 Puma plus 100 more are being built this year. And how many Tulpars Turkey has? Only one single prototype LOL! Turkey is poor country it can never outproduce Germany! Turkey still uses most tanks from Germany Leopard tanks! Because Turkey has no own tank production. The Altay will only start in 2021! lol
It looks like the Israeli IFV is based on the Merkava 3 or Merkava 4 hull since it's well sloped and it's 60 tons.
But so is the T-15
ZRB BG the merkava series are so bloody cool lookin
SashaLogan7 I agree
Yes the Namer is a modified merkava hull (4th gen usually) with just a different turret. It's really not so much different from merkava but it's best role is the APC one (in that list will be higher)
TheDarthDesigner It just needs a better engine. By the way can you modify your specifications slightly? I mean you should display the engine also in horsepowers.
To be fair I usually use the international system only but I think for the engine I can do an exception.
My only doubt is...if I change that parameter showing both systems other people will ask me to change everything else too?
In that case would be a problem :S
But for the engine I prefer horsepower too because is more common even in countries that follow the IMS
Overall Turkey wins because they placed 6th with a vehicle that costs a quarter of most others (10% of the german effort).
Germany has 350 Puma and how many Tulpar Turkey have? only 1 single prototype LOL!
@@xAlexTobiasxB Yeah think about one price 1.2m if turks(we) build more it must be cheaper than your house xD
какая разница в каком порядке видео составленно, ведь интересно просто посмотреть и сравнить различные подходы к определённому виду техники, а те кто срётся в чате ни кто иной как диванный спецыалист со злобой в мозгу, видимо от жизни хорошей..
finally turkey is building something good...(i hope altay will be in top 5 tanks)
Yes it's a very good one this IFV, the altay unfortunately doesn't seem to follow this line.It's not bad or good neither :S
TheDarthDesigner as i know altay is more heawy armored version of k2(k2 has 6 track, altay has 7 for extra weight) and aiming system is good enough too(it will use active protection systems too) i think altay is goingto be good(altay has not aouto loader for extra ammunution and for less chance of ammorack)
but i know its didnt tested on any war , because of that we cant say anything . but i think its goingto be better than k2 (k2 is a rly good tank)
Cihat Keles That is yet to be seen. Turkey should modify their ALTAY design because it doesn't look so modern right now to me. On my opinion in order for a tank to be in the top 5 it needs to be a whole new generation or a whole new innovative design or a platform. Just like the T-14. If not then the Merkava 4. Designs like T-72, M1 Abrams, T-80 and so on are modified to modern standards so they can keep up next to the modern warfare. Not the best tanks and not all of them surpass the top 5 but still effective enough. However the current ALTAY design is also a modification of another tank from another country. Turkey needs a whole new tank platform to keep up with the top 5 tanks.
Sorry, I can't really explain my point, hopefully you get it.
ZRB BG yes i understand you :) but its impossible . turkey have not ever builded any kind of tank . turkey has not any knowledge about tanks , turks can not build any platform(for now). because of that turks used korean k2 to build their own tank , think it like a helper map . turks builded altay but its based on k2 (nearly %90-95 of tanks is diffrent, but they have %5-10 same systems) altay is based on k2 and altay is more modernized/changed version of k2(k2 is one of the worlds best tanks)
The Puma is incredibly cool but the price can buy you 2 t-15's and you would still save money
I agree on everything :D
K21 = best BANG for your Buck!
:D
Has the Armata T15 gone in to production yet?
Whatever you gotta tell yourself to get through the day.
?
Tank Puma germany bagus juga laras meriam menggunakan stabiliser konstan walaupun tank nya bergerak bebas, berarti tank dalam keadaan bergerak bebas dapat langsung menembak target dengan keakurasian yaang tinggi. Tank puma ini sulit jadi sasaran tembak karna bergerak untuk bertahan dan bergerak untuk menyerang. Bagus sekali konsepnya.
1:00 о, 90-й регион, Подмосковье! )
Porque o Brasil não compra o puma alemão
The Kurganets 25 is an interesting design.
Why Tulpar is chosen from Turkish vehicles. Kaplan-30 is also a good competitor.
Ya Dieu, je m'emporte vraiment dans la perte du plaisir que tu as donné, de la santé changeante que tu as, de la part de ton Fils-Majesté qui vient soudainement et de toutes tes douleurs, Ameen
Lots errors in this video
hugo Chanou Can you point out some?
ERA on Namera, Turret remote controlled but with a man inside --' etc...
The namer offers the same protection of Merkava and the ERA is part of it just like the TROPHY APS. (from 2016 if I remember well)
-
The turret is unmanned.......
You can just watch the video and stop at 2:31.
Here you can clearly see there are no hatch on it!
Thx for your answer
About the turret unmanned I was not talking about the Namer but the Ascod
And about ERA, you mean that APS is including as an ERA thing ? It's not
From Albania my picl is the TUPLAR Turkish just 1.2€
1.2 euro?
@@dodgedemonsrtx 1.2m
BMP does not come with Stalinium hammer. Thus, I must downgrade it. Putinisky hammer is useless.
Tulpar
Tulpar looks the best love to 🇹🇷
T-15 IFV is state of the art and the Armata project vehicles are obviously the dominant vehicles in modern Armored warfare today.
T-14 yes. T-15 not so much.
Turkish Tulpar-S is not a serial vehicle. Until now only 2 pieces built.
AMOS --weapons of the future!!!
Warriors don't have 40mm cannons yet. That's still in testing. It's still a 30mm pea shooter. We can fire 3 rounds then have to reload another 3 or 6 rounds then a full reload which takes much longer. Meanwhile the Americans can spit the same rounds out of a mini gun mounted to an airplane haha
Thanks for the info!
TheDarthDesigner we know which countries you like because you play music only on certain countries. Lol
I play music only when the original video have commentary or a copyrighted music actually, when possible I always leave the original sound. Not only it's easier for me to make the video (less work) but even better...the sound of the machine is much better than music
EO PUMA TAMBÉM E O T 15 ARMATA E BOM 👍
ZBD 04 at 8th.? Not, even dreaming! It's the 50th! or more.
According to who?
If it is the top ten tracked infantry vehicles, why are there thirteen in the video?
Because youtube algorithms don't like the top13 keyword :(
Designer, why do you entitle your video "Top 10 best IFV", and then show us 13...? Change the title, please.
Because the youtube algorithm that doesn't like the "top13"
It isn't better to have 3 bonus machine and a longer and more detailed video?
I've given extra work and it's even a problem? :/
@@DarthDesigner - I see, but it's pathetic to what extent superstious people will go to avoid the number 13 at all costs...! This is the 21st century, not the Middle Age !
Поправка. "Армата" - это название унифицированной боевой платформы, а не наименование единицы техники. Всё таки, ставить Т-15 в один ряд с Курганцем, Бредли или Пумой не правильно. Т-15 по бронированию является больше танком, чем БМП.
а ставить видео "парадных проходок" в один ряд с полевыми испытаниями, нормально??)))
Еврейская колесница, ещё больше танк
Dear Israel, Can you still call it an IFV at 60 tons? But that's what it takes when its a numbers game.
lol you are right
ASCOD ... the 1
awesome
Title: top ten
Video: show 13
Deadly:)
1:29
Wow they really do use anime crew voices over there
Haahhahahaha
#13 uk, shit.... back to the drawing board lads
결함으로 죽었다 살아난 푸마...
애매한 화력과 보병 탑승 숫자 때문에 2위는 아니다...
Tulpar👍👍👍👍
Instead of top 10 it’s top 13
Correct me if I'm wrong, but namers are built from old merkava hulls?
Mostly yes :)
Tulpar must be 1
Why?
Armata on 1st place? Shouldn't you take only existing machine? Purple unicorn with magic power it is quite good for army, and like armata it has good specification ;-D Yes- i am joking, but You start.
Yes, the list takes only existing machines, and the armata is one of them :)
Why does the puma gun look so much bigger than the other 30mm guns
You can check the dimensions in the video :D
Israeli IFV provides best anti-stone protection system.
ZBD04 is cute.
БОЛЬШОЕ СПАСИБО ЗА РОЛИК !!! ХОТЯ НЕМЕЦКАЯ ПУМА ! И РОССИЙСКИЙ КУРГАНЕЦ ! Я КАК РОССИЯНИН !!! - ПРЕДПОЧТУ - КУРГАНЕЦ !!! ПРИЧЁМ - ОДНОЗНАЧНО !!!!
@ЗРИТЕЛЬ , так нет ! я же всё !!! - по имени и фамилии ! прочти !!! просто имя - с большой буквы - заслужить ещё надо ! а так - всё как полагается !
The only IFV that's really tested in real combat are the Bradley's
Ok but it's not one of the list criteria :)