If you want a quick reference guide to ontology and epistemology, grab my free cheat sheet at the following link: www.thedegreedoctor.com/ologies-opt-in NOTE: The video refers to "idealism", which is represented in the cheat sheet as "social constructivism".
Doing a PhD in sociology, got a MA in soc research methods and started working as a GTA couple years back. Genuinely struggle to understand these two still now. This is excellent, I'll be passing it onto students next academic year. Nice one!
Thank you so much for your comment! I’m really glad to hear that the video was helpful. It’s great that you’ll be sharing it with your students-I hope it makes these concepts a bit more accessible for them too. Best of luck with your PhD, and thanks again for passing the video along!
Thanks for taking the time to do this Elizabeth. I have watched a number of videos on this subject and I found yours to be the most clear, concise and comprehensive of the whole lot. You have a new subscriber.
I’m so pleased you found it helpful! I have an Ontology and Epistemology Cheat Sheet you might also find useful - here’s the link www.thedegreedoctor.com/ologies-opt-in
This is the clearest explanation I have found of these two concepts. All these years have been pure mental torture trying to understand them, but I was determined to overcome the confusion.
This an excellent video. The explanatory part is perfectly classic explanation from your intro with its classic parts through to your summary. The best part - the value added - was how seamlessly you linked your bonafides with your subscription ask - absolutely the best I've seen yet and I've watched a lot of videos. I hope you find this encouraging!
You're very welcome! I'm so glad it was helpful. Ontology and epistemology are among the concepts that most academic texts render completely incomprehensible!
What is the best way to cite you? Obviously, while RUclips helps with my understanding, it may not quality as "formal" peer-reviewed journal articles! @@DegreeDoctor
Indeed, although I think the feedback from viewers here on RUclips is 100 times better than any peer review! I've changed my explanations and ways of presenting material more on here in response to comments than in 20 years of getting my work peer reviewed, lol! Here is the reference for the video in the Harvard format, you just need to add the accessed date e.g. "Accessed 24 January 2024": Yardley, E. (2022) Ontology and Epistemology in Research - They’re not as complex as they sound! Degree Doctor. 17 November. Available from: ruclips.net/video/cdmkdFJAdnw/видео.html [Accessed date].
You're very welcome! Ontology and epistemology can seem a bit mind boggling at first, but once you get to grips with them, there's no stopping you! I do have a free ontology and epistemology cheat sheet if you'd find that helpful, it's available at this link www.thedegreedoctor.com/ologies-opt-in
Great question! When we describe something as "ontological" or "epistemological," we're using adjectives (not adverbs) to specify the type of issue or perspective we're addressing. If something is "ontological," it's about the nature of being. For example, an "ontological question" might be, "What does it mean for something to be real?" If something is "epistemological," it's about understanding and knowledge. For example, an "epistemological question" could be, "How do we know what is true?" So, when you hear "ontological argument," it means a discussion about existence. When you hear "epistemological issue," it means a discussion about knowledge and understanding. I hope this makes it clearer!
Juxtaposing technology against epistemology might involve examining how technological advancements influence the way we understand the world. It’s about comparing the methods and implications of technology with the theories and principles of epistemology, the study of knowledge. For instance, you could discuss how the internet has revolutionised access to information and challenged traditional notions of authority in knowledge acquisition.
Thanks for your question! Here are my thoughts on this: Relativism and idealism are related concepts, but they are not exactly the same thing. Relativism: Relativism argues that truth, knowledge, or morality are not absolute or universal, but rather are relative to different individuals, cultures, or historical contexts. In other words, what is considered true or moral can vary depending on the perspective or cultural framework. Relativism acknowledges the diversity of human experiences and viewpoints. Idealism: Idealism emphasises the role of ideas, thoughts, or mental constructs in shaping our understanding of reality. It posits that reality is fundamentally mental or immaterial, and that the physical world is, in some sense, dependent on the mind. Idealism suggests that the world as we perceive it is a product of our minds or consciousness, rather than existing independently of our perceptions. While there can be overlaps between relativism and idealism, they address different aspects of research. Relativism focuses on the variability of truth or morality across different perspectives, while idealism focuses on the relationship between the mind and reality. It's possible for someone to hold relativistic views about truth or morality while also subscribing to an idealistic perspective on the nature of reality, but they are distinct concepts. Hope that's helpful!
Hello Degree Doctor, If I am choosing interpretivisit approach, is that mean I should be using concpetual framework instead of theoretical framework? Hope you see this and answer.
Hi! Thanks for your question. Choosing an interpretivist approach doesn’t necessarily mean you must use a conceptual framework over a theoretical framework. A conceptual framework is often used to outline the specific concepts and relationships you're exploring, especially if your study is more exploratory or focused on understanding experiences. A theoretical framework, on the other hand, is based on existing theories that guide your analysis. Many PhD projects actually include both frameworks, so it’s a good idea to discuss this with your supervisor to see what fits best for your study. I hope this helps!
Epistemology; positivists: male interpretivists: female I found this video during watching Jordan Peterson and Michael Malices conversation Discussing Communism. I think i am going to go watch some more of your videos.
Hey could you suggest some reference on both ontology and epistemology please, I am already in your news letter and I already get tge sheet chat on ontology and epistemology
There is a fantastic book by Norman Blaikie and Jan Priest called "Social Research: Paradigms in action", which explains all of these concepts really well.
If you want a quick reference guide to ontology and epistemology, grab my free cheat sheet at the following link:
www.thedegreedoctor.com/ologies-opt-in
NOTE: The video refers to "idealism", which is represented in the cheat sheet as "social constructivism".
Doing a PhD in sociology, got a MA in soc research methods and started working as a GTA couple years back. Genuinely struggle to understand these two still now. This is excellent, I'll be passing it onto students next academic year. Nice one!
Thank you so much for your comment! I’m really glad to hear that the video was helpful. It’s great that you’ll be sharing it with your students-I hope it makes these concepts a bit more accessible for them too. Best of luck with your PhD, and thanks again for passing the video along!
Thanks for taking the time to do this Elizabeth. I have watched a number of videos on this subject and I found yours to be the most clear, concise and comprehensive of the whole lot. You have a new subscriber.
You are so welcome! I’m really pleased this video helped. Welcome to my channel!
Just had a class on this, I was completely lost. After watching ur video, it's so much clear. Thank you so much!
I’m so pleased you found it helpful! I have an Ontology and Epistemology Cheat Sheet you might also find useful - here’s the link www.thedegreedoctor.com/ologies-opt-in
metoo！lost nowhere！
This is the clearest explanation I have found of these two concepts. All these years have been pure mental torture trying to understand them, but I was determined to overcome the confusion.
I'm so pleased you found this helpful, that's great to read!
This an excellent video. The explanatory part is perfectly classic explanation from your intro with its classic parts through to your summary. The best part - the value added - was how seamlessly you linked your bonafides with your subscription ask - absolutely the best I've seen yet and I've watched a lot of videos. I hope you find this encouraging!
Thank you, much appreciated! Thanks for watching!
This is great! I know what they mean but can never use them in papers. Thank you very much.
Thanks for your kind words! I'm so pleased you enjoyed the video :-)
this is fab...the best explanation on the planet
Thank you so much for watching! Your comment has made my day, I’m so pleased I could help 😊
Thank you very much for this video. I am now ready for my test on the 4th of April. Much love from South Africa
That’s so great to read! All the best for your test!
You've given a pretty clear explanation. Many thanks
You’re very welcome! 🤓
Thanks so much, I wish you were my lecturer!
Aww, you’re welcome! That’s lovely to read, thank you!
Thank you very much for the useful information. Great video 👍🏻
You’re very welcome! ☺️
Thank you so much for this clear explanation. It will be very useful for my PhD project!
You’re very welcome! So pleased it was helpful for you! 🤓
Thank you so much for this video!! After hours of reading up on these topics I finally understand what each means
You are so welcome! I’m glad this helped you, thanks for watching! 🙏
Thank you! After spending hours reading journal articles, I found this video which made everything make more sense!
You're very welcome! I'm so glad it was helpful. Ontology and epistemology are among the concepts that most academic texts render completely incomprehensible!
What is the best way to cite you? Obviously, while RUclips helps with my understanding, it may not quality as "formal" peer-reviewed journal articles! @@DegreeDoctor
Indeed, although I think the feedback from viewers here on RUclips is 100 times better than any peer review! I've changed my explanations and ways of presenting material more on here in response to comments than in 20 years of getting my work peer reviewed, lol! Here is the reference for the video in the Harvard format, you just need to add the accessed date e.g. "Accessed 24 January 2024":
Yardley, E. (2022) Ontology and Epistemology in Research - They’re not as complex as they sound! Degree Doctor. 17 November. Available from: ruclips.net/video/cdmkdFJAdnw/видео.html [Accessed date].
Thank you for this wonderful lecture.
You’re very welcome! So pleased you found it helpful 🤓☺️🙏
Thankyou so much, I was feeling really confused on this and you have explained it so well.
You're very welcome! Ontology and epistemology can seem a bit mind boggling at first, but once you get to grips with them, there's no stopping you! I do have a free ontology and epistemology cheat sheet if you'd find that helpful, it's available at this link www.thedegreedoctor.com/ologies-opt-in
helpful video, very interesting and educational
Thank you! I hope it answered your ontology and epistemology questions! 🤓
Now what I need to understand is how they are used as adverbs like when describing something as ontological or epistemological.
Great question! When we describe something as "ontological" or "epistemological," we're using adjectives (not adverbs) to specify the type of issue or perspective we're addressing.
If something is "ontological," it's about the nature of being. For example, an "ontological question" might be, "What does it mean for something to be real?"
If something is "epistemological," it's about understanding and knowledge. For example, an "epistemological question" could be, "How do we know what is true?"
So, when you hear "ontological argument," it means a discussion about existence. When you hear "epistemological issue," it means a discussion about knowledge and understanding.
I hope this makes it clearer!
Priceless. Thank you.
You’re very welcome! Glad you found it helpful 🤓
Very helpful as always. Thank you!
You’re very welcome! 🤓
How does one juxtapose technology against epistemology?
Juxtaposing technology against epistemology might involve examining how technological advancements influence the way we understand the world. It’s about comparing the methods and implications of technology with the theories and principles of epistemology, the study of knowledge. For instance, you could discuss how the internet has revolutionised access to information and challenged traditional notions of authority in knowledge acquisition.
Thank you, this has helped me.
You're welcome!
Thanks for this. Are a relativist and idealist approach the same?
Thanks for your question! Here are my thoughts on this:
Relativism and idealism are related concepts, but they are not exactly the same thing.
Relativism: Relativism argues that truth, knowledge, or morality are not absolute or universal, but rather are relative to different individuals, cultures, or historical contexts. In other words, what is considered true or moral can vary depending on the perspective or cultural framework. Relativism acknowledges the diversity of human experiences and viewpoints.
Idealism: Idealism emphasises the role of ideas, thoughts, or mental constructs in shaping our understanding of reality. It posits that reality is fundamentally mental or immaterial, and that the physical world is, in some sense, dependent on the mind. Idealism suggests that the world as we perceive it is a product of our minds or consciousness, rather than existing independently of our perceptions.
While there can be overlaps between relativism and idealism, they address different aspects of research. Relativism focuses on the variability of truth or morality across different perspectives, while idealism focuses on the relationship between the mind and reality. It's possible for someone to hold relativistic views about truth or morality while also subscribing to an idealistic perspective on the nature of reality, but they are distinct concepts.
Hope that's helpful!
Hello Degree Doctor, If I am choosing interpretivisit approach, is that mean I should be using concpetual framework instead of theoretical framework? Hope you see this and answer.
Hi! Thanks for your question. Choosing an interpretivist approach doesn’t necessarily mean you must use a conceptual framework over a theoretical framework. A conceptual framework is often used to outline the specific concepts and relationships you're exploring, especially if your study is more exploratory or focused on understanding experiences. A theoretical framework, on the other hand, is based on existing theories that guide your analysis. Many PhD projects actually include both frameworks, so it’s a good idea to discuss this with your supervisor to see what fits best for your study. I hope this helps!
@@DegreeDoctor thanks a lot, Degree Doctor
Ontology = What is this?
Epistemology = How do I (come to) know what this is?
Absolutely! 👍
@@DegreeDoctor I also teach philosophy
Epistemology;
positivists: male
interpretivists: female
I found this video during watching Jordan Peterson and Michael Malices conversation Discussing Communism. I think i am going to go watch some more of your videos.
Thank you! Welcome to the channel! 🤓
@@DegreeDoctor Do you disagree/agree, with my interpretation of male vs female Epistemology?
I am actually curious.
Hey could you suggest some reference on both ontology and epistemology please, I am already in your news letter and I already get tge sheet chat on ontology and epistemology
There is a fantastic book by Norman Blaikie and Jan Priest called "Social Research: Paradigms in action", which explains all of these concepts really well.
@@DegreeDoctor thanks a lot for your help