Boeing Recoverable Launch Booster
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 фев 2025
- The Boeing doublebody, winged booster, known as Model 832-40
made use of a Dyna-Soar glider as the crew module and escape capsule.
Powered by twin clusters made up of 4 Rocketdyne J-2B rocket engines for vertical boost and 3 hydrogen-fueled, General Electric MF239C Turbofan engines for horizontal flight and landing. Designed for use with a variety of upper stages
8gb nVIDIA GeForce Rtx 3070 Founders Edition
Source: media.defense....
Song: Max Brhon - Cyberpunk [NCS Release]
Music provided by NoCopyrightSounds
Free Download/Stream: ncs.io/Cyberpunk
Watch: • Max Brhon - Cyberpunk ...
#boeing #nasa #ksp
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
I think this video includes one of your best VFX shots yet, that being the tracking shot of approach and landing. There’s something about the way you were able to paint out Endeavour almost entirely and replace it with something that, for the most part, is able to fit in perfectly, down to the haze of the video feed and just its external appearance, with the way it reflects the runway beneath it. Genuinely great stuff, showing how truly talented you are in this field and how far you’ve come from your earlier work.
They use a mix of real footage and the rendered vehicle i believe
@@Aerospace0821 I know.
Superb shot indeed. Best part of an already great production.
@@Aerospace0821 Nope.
This is entirely CGI.
@@Aerospace0821 Apart from the voice over this is.
At first I thought this was a LV for the Dyna-Soar on top, but using it as the command section/escape vehicle is pretty slick.
What about the payload especially with humans? This design didn’t take into account what happened to space shuttles when they strapped them next to boosters did they? It’s a cute little video too show kids but no where near practical in the year 2024.
The Boeing 832-40C was supposed to be capable of carrying a verity of upper stages on its back, including the X20 as a payload.
@@CryptoMiningTurtleim guessing the payload would not contain any humans, since there is much safer crew compartment on the top of the rocket (that can abort).
@@CryptoMiningTurtle The big issue with shuttle abort modes was the solid boosters. This design does not have those so a manned aerospace payload on the back would jettison with a very high likely hood of survival.
The reflections on the body at touchdown are awesome.
Opening shot looks straight of Thunderbirds TV shows, brilliant!
Jet engines on the booster stage would make for easier return to base at slower speeds.
that landing ! very impressive shot
Looks amazing. The texture on the metal is so good.
Yes.
As goofy as this craft looks, its a valid design.
Is this "beyond awesome" or what? Incredible! Thanks for producing this!
Wow! This is amazing! This totally looks like REAL video of real vehicle flight and especially the landing and roll-out..
Very nicely done!!
What an impressive CGI.
Not going to lie, but if this was actually made, it would save the U.S. a lot of money.
I wish they could also fly the Venture Star, I *loved* this SSTO design =)
I literally had to look this up. Unreal. Very creative and well done. I’m still somewhat in disbelief.
That is so cool!! I bet NASA engineers watch your channel all the time!
Good thing that this was a concept than the real thing. Just the cost of building this vehicle, transporting to the launch site, recovering, any repairs, or replacement parts, and the man hours to maintain to flight status, would be enormous. More than several moon missions and the next generation shuttles combined.
Wow, if only they had built it. Great animations
Bad ass, and with Xcom2 music or something like it. I say, lets get a couple of these for the Space Force and rock and roll. All phases were gorgeous.
you work is improving... looking better and better..
I don’t know how you do it. Each video better than the last.
⁹
This is the first time I'm seeing this unique design. Please rest assured you did it justice!
Thank you for sharing this with us! 650th like.
Thanks
Thank You
That is an awesome concept, and animation. Back when Boeing could actually make stuff that works.
Check out John Oliver's "Last Week Tonight" segment on Boeing, and where they think that the problems began. Funny, of course, but quite informative...
Fantasic work ! and yes this is A Dyna-Soar on top of booster serve as canard for booster and escape system for Pilot
This looks pretty stunning of an idea, technically. Two of these make up form factor of R-7 pretty much, just reusable instead of crucifying themselves after separation.
Modern day design ofc doesn't need no pilots, nor so many turbofans perhaps
This is exactly what I’ve came up with in KSP! I used the mk2 for the fly back also I used the mk1 parts for the shuttle on top. I’ll leave the carrier craft in lowest orbit and then recover after I send my shuttle too a station.
As long as this thing doesn't have any door plugs that could pop off, they'll be fine
I recognized the "Dyna Soar" vehicle from seeing the Artist Conception drawing way back in the 1970's or earlier! Wasn't that an early concept vehicle designed right after the data from our X-15 project was analyzed?
Мощь! Это очень близко к полётной схеме советской системы "Спираль", хотя орбитальный самолёт здесь получается тяжелее.
Качество впечатляющее. Правдоподобность на высоте.
Да ладно загонять. У советского союза кроме Бурана не было реализовано ни одной программы модуля многоразового использования. Фантастики начитался.
@@Skipper441 ты на комментарий к мультику, который никогда не был реализован, отвечаешь тем, что "проект Спираль никогда не был реализован"? Ты наркоман? =) У Дайна-соар и Спирали в равной доли были реализованы орбитальные космические самолёты. И тот и другой были опробованы американскими и советскими пилотами в нескольких тестах посадки!
@@Skipper441 а у штатов что, кроме челнока ещё что-то было? 🤦♂ (не считая современного spacex, но тут-то речь про старые системы) ️
Ok that thing just Looks bonkers.
I assume the "Small plane" i the Front Acts as an emergency escape vehicle for the Pilot of the Boost section?
It's a Dyna-Soar. Yes, used as the crew module for the booster and as an escape capsule.
This is a graphics job
Impressive work!
Wow, that tracking shot!
Good to see mission abort escape vehicles ... now. The Challenger crew cabin fell for nearly 3 minutes during which the astronauts were alive until hitting the water at over 200 mph and 25 Gs. There was water found in their lungs. Not even a parachute.
3:22 This ladies and gentleman. Is true VFX
amazing work as always!
X-20 DYNASOAR as a cockpit?
Wonder if they're going to ship this one with all bolts installed
Great Shot 🤘🇱🇷
*Spectacular*
Thank God NASA (or anyone) could do CGI like this in the 60s and 70s. The Moon deniers would be unstoppable.
Wonderful that Boeing is finally making progress in the space race. Unfortunately they haven’t been able to purge the company of the architects of the most ridiculous designs in aviation. Hallmarked by the B747 top, the X-32, and this here „mating bowling pins” design.
On peut toujours rêver!
Great art!
Nice!
This was an awesome 😎 little exercise, in imagining what could of been... Very 😊 fun.. And for those who want to continue to bash Boeing, I for one, am thankful, that they, (Boeing) helped prevent German, from being our national language... Have some historical perspective folks...
I thought both the X-20 Dynasoar and whatever that small black orbiter from the boater section would detach at the same time, and I thought that the big silver shuttle thing would just land on its own as a reusable booster as well.
Ironic how close this is to NASA's original Space Shuttle concept.
This concept would have had more survivability than the Space Shuttle with the Dyna Soar being an integrated escape system. The Space Shuttle didn't have ejection seats or an escape capsule. The Space Shuttle Crew Escape System unfortunately required the astronauts to unstrap from their seats, make their way to the escape hatch, evacuate using an extending pole to slide away from the craft, and then deploy their parachutes. This would've required precious seconds to evacuate, making survival of a catastrophic event highly unlikely.
I wonder If it has any door plugs?
Amazing job,😮
It's kind of sad to think that for every shuttle program built there were probably 15 designs scrapped and never realized! I just hope that with AI and new technology breakthroughs more companies and nations can get into the business so that space travel becomes as routine as trans-oceanic flights are now! Virtually accessible to all peoples!
This whole thing is the most real looking cgi I have ever seen can we do close encounters that same way return of Roy Nerrey
We all know that if Boeing did build it, it would be missing at least a few bolts.
Nice CGI but ....Since this is Boeing, the project will cost several times it's original budget, go many years past it's planned inception, and then fail because some dumb designer forgot about flame retardant wiring tape.
Why don’t you do a video on the Aldebaran Spacecraft from 1959 next?
1:56 - 😍
Who did the landing voice? I liked that voice 😅
I think it's just the audio of a shuttle landing
That voice!
so the guys in the orbital spaceplane are pretty much screwed in an emg but the guys on top are ok?
New rendering engine? Looks so much more realistic
забыл поставить тебе лайк. пришлось посмотреть еще раз. просто супер видео!
It'll work if Musk builds it.
Chipmunks could fly on that thing!
The descent cam was absurd, it looked photoreal.
I love how there is just a little Dyna Soar haphazardly attached to the front of it
Great job!@!!
Epic! 😎
Superb.
And this will create enough aerodynamic lift at landing?
It's called a drough chute, not a drag shoot. A drough chute *produces* drag.
Awesome video, cool concept, beautiful looking vehicle.
❓ Question for anyone- 🎥Camera Shake effect, I'm growing wary of it, am I alone?
But, will the door plugs stay in? ;-P
Its the X33 but made in the Space Race and a TSTO
I find the SpaceX Starship pimp much more interesting; it does not require a runway.
Why didn't the spacecraft not separate from the booster?
Why is the X-20 attached? Seems like just dead weight
Using a Dyna-Soar as the cockpit is a bit strange in my opinion.
Gear doesn’t come down till 300 feet?
What’s up with the Dyna-Soar on top?
Realy I like this video
looks like a retro rocket
What's being "Blurred" out @ 3:04.5 when she lands?? Center line of fusilage. Over fly between rear gear.. Anyone?
That's heat distortion from exhaust coming from the three jet engines located in-between the rocket engines. These jet engines would provide extended range for this piloted "fly back" booster concept. The booster wouldn't have glided back home like the Space Shuttle did.
So the 1st stg is controlled by man! (Can Elon add a Dragon on Starship as an escape capsule?
perfect
Very good animation. At first I thought is was real although I doubted the Air Force had something that futuristic to pop out of nowhere. Keep up the good work and perhaps you can create a fake Biden to give the State of the Union address.
Good graphics, from which video game??
What shuttle did this rocket lift?
Do Boeing have it on the drawing board??????
Dynasoar with space hemroids?
Красивый мультик.
That’s fukin cool!
Honestly, doing the maths, can't see why this wouldn't do a horizontal takeoff from a LONG runway or lake bed and then accelerate to transonic before zooming.
Should totally work but if not there's the Starliner to fall back on, LOL.
Man....we used to dream big and bold......now, we can't even get out of low earth orbit....so sad
Boeing is finished. A little animation is all she has left.
Isn't that the BoMi concept?
That'd be terrifying to pilot hahaha
That seems a stripped-down version of the X-33/Venture Star
More like Retro-Star, eh!? Eh?
it's probably based on the space shuttle concept
Looks like venturestar 🎉
Either Boeing hires programmers from Google and Microsoft or make the duct tape a require tool for events that go wrong.
Quem está filmando do espaço?
Робат Илон Маск🤣🤣🤣
That is one T H I C boi
Model number 737?
Much better than space shuttle and Starship