AS350 B3e Helicopter Crash at Frisco, Colorado, July 3, 2015

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 29 сен 2024
  • www.ntsb.gov/n...
    Two video clips depict the takeoff and crash of an Airbus Helicopters AS350 B3e helicopter, which was registered to and operated by Air Methods Corporation as a public relations flight. On July 3, 2015, about 1:39 p.m. mountain daylight time, the helicopter lifted off from the Summit Medical Center Heliport in Frisco, Colorado, and then crashed into a parking lot. The pilot was fatally injured, and the two flight nurses were seriously injured. The helicopter was destroyed by impact forces and a postcrash fire.
    The first video clip was recorded by a camera located at a building opposite the helipad, and the second video clip was recorded by a camera mounted on a light pole in the medical center parking lot. The videos were recorded at multiple frame rates, resulting in video motion that is not smooth. The first video clip lasts about 1 minute, and the second video clip lasts about 12 seconds. The video includes a voice-over narration.
    The first video clip begins with the helicopter on the helipad before takeoff and displays an arrow indicating the windsock at the helipad on the upper right side of the screen. The helicopter lifts off without pausing and immediately begins to rotate to the left; the counterclockwise spin continues as the helicopter exits the field of view at the top of the frame. A text box indicates the time since takeoff (flight time) in seconds at the bottom of the screen. The helicopter is out of sight for about 22 seconds, and then it re-enters the field of view on the upper left side of the screen as it crashes in the medical center parking lot. The helicopter re-entering the frame is highlighted with a white circle. The onset of the postcrash fire can be seen after ground impact. The accident flight lasted about 32 seconds.
    The video transitions to the view in medical center parking lot. The helicopter appears at the top of the frame rotating to counterclockwise about 1 second before its impact with a parked recreational vehicle and the ground. The video shows fuel flowing from the wreckage on the pavement near the helicopter 3.7 seconds after impact, with the first fire becoming visible 0.2 second later.

Комментарии • 181

  • @HeliPadUSA
    @HeliPadUSA 7 лет назад +35

    Wow that was such a slam in to the pavement I'm surprised someone survived and that fire was quick!

    • @KandiKlover
      @KandiKlover 6 лет назад

      Definitely not a good PR flighy there.

    • @hotrodray9884
      @hotrodray9884 6 лет назад +1

      Heli PadUSA ... Amazing how jet fuel burns huh.

  • @strongme80
    @strongme80 7 лет назад +6

    It's 2015, and the camera is still shitty!

    • @riphaven
      @riphaven 7 лет назад +3

      yep, update the camera or buy a new VHS tape.

    • @hotrodray9884
      @hotrodray9884 6 лет назад

      Security camera.... Whadda ya think. They had a videographer there ready to capture the crash?

  • @avalanche9026
    @avalanche9026 Год назад

    You might be linceseed heli pilot. But that don’t make you a good pilot. You must fill the unit every inch reaction etc. be aware what’s happening around you. Winds ? Current ? Sorry for that dude. Dyed so fast for no reason

  • @rctheil
    @rctheil 6 лет назад

    For a pilot who was well-aware of the problems of these aircraft, why the fuck did he even get out of ground effect? Seems to me he should have noticed the lack of yaw control and immediately reduced collective input.

    • @nemome5837
      @nemome5837 6 лет назад

      bitNine Exactly. I knew that and I'm just an FS9 user.

  • @danahan01
    @danahan01 7 лет назад +2

    Oopsie!! 😬😬

  • @joedoe8931
    @joedoe8931 7 лет назад

    It could have been a mechanical failure. Tail rotors are famous for giving out at just the most inopportune times. They are full of mechanical stress points and wear points. The pilot might have decided to cut the power and auto rotate down in hopes of flaring out and making the best of a very bad situation. They had no parachutes and there is a danger of the aircraft breaking apart if the tail rotor is in operative. Tail rotor is needed to counter act the HP of the gas turbine engine that allows it to vertical lift out of the heliport and that engine is very powerful and coupled to a transmission. RIP to the pilot that might have been doing everything right in a aircraft that had gone deadly wrong on him.

    • @michb7414
      @michb7414 7 лет назад +3

      Nope Checklist chicklist chicklist. 350 pilots all know what occurred

  • @coronapack
    @coronapack 3 года назад

    Gotta love pilot error. Self induced LTE from setting up at crosswind, and immediately lifting off.

    • @GRosa250
      @GRosa250 3 года назад +1

      LTE from crosswind, right on the money

    • @kroberts
      @kroberts 2 года назад +1

      No LTE, HYD weren't turned back on after the accumulator test. H125 will take off fine with a small cross wind. Would be more worried about a right crosswind rather than left with opposite rotor direction.

    • @crazyralph6386
      @crazyralph6386 Год назад

      @@kroberts gotta love these armchair know it all’s? every crash is LTE according to these halfwits.

  • @boltar2003
    @boltar2003 7 лет назад +59

    I'm amazed anyone survived that frankly.

    • @Flightstar
      @Flightstar 7 лет назад +2

      Yes, That is surprising. I wonder if they survived the crash but not the accident, The impact must have thrashed them all into unconsciousness, but the post fire looked as though it was well on it's way of consuming the wreckage.

    • @homefront3162
      @homefront3162 7 лет назад +3

      boltar2003 All the passengers are 1" shorter now I suppose

    • @p84120
      @p84120 7 лет назад

      boltar2003 i

    • @DistinctiveTents
      @DistinctiveTents 7 лет назад +8

      The pilot was unfortunately killed, 2 flight nurses survived but with 2nd and 3rd degree burns over 90% of their bodies.

    • @mandh14
      @mandh14 5 лет назад +2

      Don't call me Frankly!

  • @triseptimus7938
    @triseptimus7938 7 лет назад +13

    Don't watch the impact in slow-mo...Just about lost my cookies when I figured out what I was seeing.

    • @StanWilhite
      @StanWilhite 4 года назад +4

      Since you said what you did about slo-mo I watched at that speed. Can't
      make out anything. What am i missing? thanks

    • @MikiderZOCKER
      @MikiderZOCKER 3 года назад

      @@StanWilhite i would say you can barley see the pilot smashing trough the window being hold from the seatbelt

  • @aviatorgriff
    @aviatorgriff 2 года назад +4

    I watched that entire crash unfold from my house a couple blocks away. To this day when I’m up there I go by the memorial park.

  • @digitalpilot6854
    @digitalpilot6854 4 года назад +7

    My grandpa was his friend and also a pilot for flight for life when this happened. So sad to see it end like this. R.I.P.

  • @michaeljansen3540
    @michaeljansen3540 6 лет назад +11

    I am not a pilot. but if the helicopter is spinning out of control on lift off why keep going up? why not set it back down?

    • @hotrodray9884
      @hotrodray9884 6 лет назад +3

      Michael Jansen ..... EXACTLY. That's why we hover at a few inches to establish we have control. Good call!!!
      We also pedal turn into the wind as it looks like he tried to do.

    • @lukeponsonby7926
      @lukeponsonby7926 6 лет назад

      Because he’s an American pilot

    • @cplcubflyer
      @cplcubflyer 6 лет назад +5

      I am a pilot, you are an idiot.

    • @ATalkingBadger
      @ATalkingBadger 5 лет назад +10

      @@lukeponsonby7926 you're an idiot. Americans invented the first aircraft dumbass.

    • @phillippasteur3904
      @phillippasteur3904 5 лет назад

      @@lukeponsonby7926 You are one stupid wannabe US citizen we don't need here.

  • @hotrodray9884
    @hotrodray9884 6 лет назад +15

    As a former medivac person, I can tell you the "hurry-up-itis" causes a lot of problems. From these takeoff check fails, hot starts, lifting with the APU still hooked, swinging/drifting the tail into fences, trees, hitting street lights, etc. Not to mention the who-cares- shitbox maintenance many get.

  • @johnsmith7622
    @johnsmith7622 4 года назад +4

    If you have a weak stomach.... TAP OUT NOW..... The pilot's head is severed....... Most people can't handle seeing anything like this.... Medic for 4 years.... PTSD FOR 20..... I thought it was a blessing that I could turn off my emotions... and not feel anything...... Well..... Years later all of those I couldn't save..... came crashing down own upon me.... after being locked away.... for so long.... I had forgotten...... God help us afflicted with such trauma.....

    • @shoechew
      @shoechew 2 года назад

      Cool....story.....bro..

  • @HappyQuailsLC
    @HappyQuailsLC 2 года назад +1

    Why aren't the actual audio portions added? Not just the inclusion of subtitles added?

  • @joeycastle5753
    @joeycastle5753 5 лет назад +1

    You can view the entire crash report here: www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/AAR1701.pdf

  • @dvclama
    @dvclama 7 лет назад +10

    It look like other As350 crash I know, "hydraulic test button" forgotten "on", while hovering..

  • @mostefatayebcherif6798
    @mostefatayebcherif6798 5 месяцев назад

    Wao it's sad to see or hear that .
    I think it's loss tail effectiveness LTE .
    There is a SB for the pilote concern LTE

  • @robertgift
    @robertgift 7 лет назад +5

    So.rry. Cause was pilot error.
    Wish it had fallen on the RV which may have cushioned the impact enough for everyone to get out.
    Amazed that anyone could survive that impact. Pilot died. Flight RN badly burned Recently out of hospital.
    Afterising out of camera view, thelicopter'shadow on the ground can be seen.
    Am told the pilot is to rise a few feet above ground and check hydraulic systems before departing.
    If a failure or no control, thelicopter is only a few feet off the ground so no destructive impact.

    • @joeycastle5753
      @joeycastle5753 5 лет назад +2

      You can view the full report here : www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/AAR1701.pdf

  • @spoonforthought3534
    @spoonforthought3534 4 года назад +3

    When you log that flight time in seconds

  • @marcelmolina6421
    @marcelmolina6421 6 лет назад +2

    Will the campers insurance cover helicopter crashes

  • @kyletrummel69
    @kyletrummel69 3 года назад

    At least they crashed in a Medical Center parking lot. Incident response was probably super fast.

  • @larrynorman1919
    @larrynorman1919 6 лет назад +1

    I own 3 helicopters and wouldn't step foot in any of them.

  • @WarblesOnALot
    @WarblesOnALot 7 лет назад +10

    G'day,
    Whuff !
    It was a Squirrel, and their Rotors run backwards compared to British & US Helicopters, so using an Aerospatiale's Right Pedal sucks Torque out of the Gearbox & using Left Pedal allows all the Engines twistiness to be fed to the Main Rotor.
    This looked as if the Pilot determined to execute a "Pop-up Climb", aiming to achieve maximum climb-rate by treading the Left Pedal while rolling on full throttle & pulling Collective-Pitch...; then either they lost control after becoming disoriented by the vigorous Yaw..., and/or Gyroscopic Precession got the better of the Controls' ability to stabilise the Aircraft & it rolled "Skid-Low"...., or when going up through 50 or 75 ft that's when the Pilot has discovered that the Tail-Rotor wasn't working for some reason (a point which should've been tested in the Hover, at 1 to 5 ft altitude, before departing from the Pad...).
    A nasty prang.
    ;-p
    Ciao !

    • @timlandscheidt
      @timlandscheidt 7 лет назад +4

      You don't have to speculate (incorrectly); you can just read the accident report published by the NTSB.

    • @WarblesOnALot
      @WarblesOnALot 7 лет назад +4

      +Tim Landscheidt
      G'day,
      I was working my way up from the bottom through a scroll of YT Notifications, and haven't got to the second Video on this prang yet.
      If you deeply abhor amateur armchair Crashanalysis then bully for you, munchiekins ; but I disagree strongly with your position, and just as you're free to never think about what you see and you're free to never voice your opinions of what anything APPEARS to be..., so I'm free to make a guesstimation on a public Thread and then check to see how far wrong I might be by viewing the second video.
      I'm not afraid of being wrong.
      Such is Life,
      Have a good one...
      ;-p
      Ciao !

    • @WarblesOnALot
      @WarblesOnALot 7 лет назад +3

      +Tim Landscheidt
      Obiewun Kanobie....
      Been there, looked at Video the second, read the Clip Description, and...; well, I wasn't far wrong, lack of Hydraulic Boost to the Tail-Rotor Pitch-Control amounts to "Tail Rotor Failure" in that insufficient Anti-Torque force to prevent a Spin was available at Flight Power-loadings.
      I haven't worked on a Squirrel since 1979, but I still recall that checking the effectiveness of the Tail-Rotor by wig-wagging the Pedals in Low Hover, while checking the available Torque (or Manifold Pressure, back in the old Piston-Engined days) BEFORE pulling Pitch & Power and trying to climb-out.
      If the contention is that the Pilot elected to continue the Flight despite losing Yaw-Control at an altitude of one inch, then blaming a Hydraulic Failure is hardly fair...
      In my opinion.
      ;-p
      Ciao !

    • @timlandscheidt
      @timlandscheidt 7 лет назад +4

      Of course you are "free to make a guesstimation on a public thread"; otherwise I would have reported your comment to RUclips or the police. But you are also free to use all the available information the NTSB provides to the public.

    • @devitomichael
      @devitomichael 7 лет назад

      This is what happens when pilots spend too much time flying and not enough time with God! Did the pilots pray before their flight for a safe journey, my guess is NO! Keep ignoring God you dumb asses know who you are!

  • @Robochop-vz3qm
    @Robochop-vz3qm Год назад

    Imagine that. Sitting in your RV having breakfast, minding your own business then this....

  • @puterausman7682
    @puterausman7682 7 лет назад +1

    The hazard of boondocking...hit by falling helicopter or airplane.

    • @hudsondonnell444
      @hudsondonnell444 7 лет назад

      A simple mistake can cost you your life. Slow down and review the checklist and concentrate.

  • @phapnui
    @phapnui 7 лет назад

    Starting out with a quarterly tailwind is not good. You must immediately correct with pedal or you soon lose it

  • @fakesrpeloisahypocrite
    @fakesrpeloisahypocrite Год назад

    0:57 weeeee!

  • @Thunderbyrd.
    @Thunderbyrd. 7 лет назад +8

    Kind of looks like someone was ejected out of the left side at impact.

    • @ThisIsInput
      @ThisIsInput 7 лет назад +1

      That was the pilot. He did end up passing away from injuries.

    • @bruce2357
      @bruce2357 7 лет назад +4

      The report states it was a flight nurse that was ejected.

    • @JohnSmith-mk8hz
      @JohnSmith-mk8hz 7 лет назад

      White helmet?

    • @spencerific93
      @spencerific93 5 лет назад

      Hard to make out, but watching it at 1/4 speed I think I can see what you're talking about. The one flight nurse was ejected out the left side of the helicopter, so that's likely them.

  • @whiteclifffl
    @whiteclifffl 6 лет назад +1

    Did the helicopter died?

  • @bqwertycqwerty3948
    @bqwertycqwerty3948 5 лет назад

    On your 1st holliday in 20 years then this happens 😮

  • @JohnSmith-ji7vc
    @JohnSmith-ji7vc 6 лет назад +4

    Pilot was used to single HYD system, and this one was newer dual. He flipped switch to test that stops flow to TR and did not turn it back on before take off. All he had to do was push right pedal.

    • @OMGWTFLOLSMH
      @OMGWTFLOLSMH 3 года назад +2

      All he had to do was flip the switch back.

    • @n7346e
      @n7346e 7 месяцев назад

      So was it a good test or bad test?

  • @huntermcclovio4517
    @huntermcclovio4517 2 года назад

    safe to say this has been a crash course.

  • @JIMJAMSC
    @JIMJAMSC 6 лет назад +2

    The flight nurse got 100m settlement but was horribly burned. Not sure why the Vet pilot did not do a hover check especially after having it worked on. Only winners are the lawyers and Ins companies.

  • @lukeponsonby7926
    @lukeponsonby7926 6 лет назад +5

    I’ve flown many paper planes before, so I can comment on this crash! It was the camper vans fault getting in the way of a perfect landing

  • @rcbif101
    @rcbif101 7 лет назад +3

    Sad, another 10 feet and that RV may have cushioned the impact enough for everyone to survive.

    • @corzaq3066
      @corzaq3066 7 лет назад

      Rcbif I was just thinking the exact same thing... life is cruel

    • @potatotrain2071
      @potatotrain2071 6 лет назад

      steve b nobody was inside of it just a couple of dogs

  • @davidmcc359
    @davidmcc359 7 лет назад +10

    Not being a pilot myself, but having flew in hundreds of Helicopter flights over three decades, the immediate lift-off, which was within the windsock levels and allowed conditions, I don't think wind was an issue.. In all my times flying in helicopters, it was strange to see the turning maneuver immediately begin so early AND CONTINUE, almost as if there was a mechanical issue with the pedal controlling the tail-rotor.. Looking at it a few times, I can only assume that the pedal or rear rotor became locked in one position thus instantly beginning the rotation, considering that the aircraft came down on it's starboard side would mean it had continued to rotate.. Now correct me if I'm wrong, I won't be offended, just offering my viewpoint on the footage..

    • @mcarson5184
      @mcarson5184 7 лет назад +6

      It was "pilot error" a hydraulic test switch was left on meaning he had no control of the tail rotor on takeoff. The pilot was very experienced (Vietnam vet; purple heart, bronze star, shot down 3 times, 1200 combat flight hours) and had been working for flight for life since 1987. Seems like the helicopter wasn't outfitted with a crash resistant fuel tank due to a loop hole or any kind of warning system to the hydraulic test switch being left on. Sad that such a small mistake by an experienced person can lead to this.

    • @kenthall807
      @kenthall807 7 лет назад +2

      www.denverpost.com/2017/03/28/flight-for-life-crash-caused-by-hydraulic-issue/

    • @KandiKlover
      @KandiKlover 6 лет назад

      gary wilson No you're not be quiet.

    • @wtimber
      @wtimber 6 лет назад

      Often these mistakes are made by very experienced pilots, whats the old saying, they have forgotten more than we will ever know...

    • @jimmycline4778
      @jimmycline4778 4 года назад +1

      David McC Ive never flown in a helicopter in my life, I’ve flown in 747s to Little one engine planes, I will never fly in a helicopter, I don’t trust them, I’ve seen more helicopter crashes than plane clashes, but I’ve seen several helicopters crash exactly like this, you thought it was strange about the way it crashed, I find it common!

  • @mrpaulgrimm6129
    @mrpaulgrimm6129 4 года назад

    Why end it?

  • @susanwahl6322
    @susanwahl6322 4 года назад

    !

  • @drive9997
    @drive9997 7 лет назад

    seems like alot of medical helicopters crash

    • @wickedmuffin76
      @wickedmuffin76 7 лет назад +1

      Medical helicopters log a lot of flight time, more flying=more crashing. When there were a lot more news helicopters, there were a lot more news helicopter crashes.

  • @G1v3EmH3ll
    @G1v3EmH3ll 2 года назад

    The registration is N390LG, a 2013 AS350B3 Ecureuil C/N 7595

  • @dronexfun8469
    @dronexfun8469 7 лет назад

    looks like a residential area not an airport.

  • @markcallaway2595
    @markcallaway2595 7 лет назад

    The pilot was fatally injured.

    • @kennyc388
      @kennyc388 7 лет назад +1

      Is that similar to KILLED ?

    • @LatitudeSky
      @LatitudeSky 6 лет назад

      The pilot was rapidly disassembled, as shown in the video. RIP.

  • @JD2CYLINDERNUT
    @JD2CYLINDERNUT 7 лет назад

    Bet the guy in the RV was pissed......

    • @potatotrain2071
      @potatotrain2071 6 лет назад

      JD2CYLINDERNUT it was the pilot’s RV

    • @spencerific93
      @spencerific93 5 лет назад +1

      @@potatotrain2071
      Was it really? What are the odds?

  • @pilsnrimgaard2507
    @pilsnrimgaard2507 7 лет назад +1

    Any experienced hilo pilot knows that when loss of tail rotor control (anti torque) happens is you back off the collective (vertical control) in order to reduce altitude and counter rotation. This idiot went all the way to 150 ft...Yank his license, who does he think is...Harrison Ford!

    • @GRadvbro
      @GRadvbro 7 лет назад

      Pils Nrimgaard pilot is dead. Might have been ejected from left side of chopper and into rotor.

    • @BeechComer
      @BeechComer 6 лет назад

      Pilot usually sits on the right, so the collective doesn't interfere w/ ingress/egress. So probably it was the copilot that was ejected (but rotor was not a factor after *that* hit), and pilot remained in the cockpit, it hurts to watch, I feel for his widow who probably had to watch that several times unless she demurred. As a pilot myself, I can see it both ways.

  • @diamondstar1200
    @diamondstar1200 6 лет назад +1

    That take off was way too abrupt. All inputs in a helicopter should be slow and steady.

  • @bullainsworth3130
    @bullainsworth3130 7 лет назад +41

    By the way, I'm not a pilot, but I did stay at a holiday inn express last night.

    • @DistinctiveTents
      @DistinctiveTents 7 лет назад +1

      Yeah the pilot was killed. Also the pedals were misconfigured when the helicopter was in for maintenance.

    • @hotrodray9884
      @hotrodray9884 6 лет назад

      Security Camera Man ... That seems strange... But see my other post.

    • @hadleymanmusic
      @hadleymanmusic 6 лет назад

      Security Camera Man you mean to tell me took it apart and put it back together wrong? These GD dumbass ap schools need an exit door to a fema camp instead of certification of idiots

  • @jackflash6377
    @jackflash6377 7 лет назад +1

    Isn't that a French helicopter?

  • @jstrotha0975
    @jstrotha0975 6 лет назад +1

    Did he dieded?

  • @mosesmanaka8109
    @mosesmanaka8109 Год назад

    I heard that the pilot got too hot up there so he switched the fan off.

  • @wulihubi
    @wulihubi 7 лет назад

    As it seems, the pilot did not take off into the wind. Thats really dangerous!

  • @bestamerica
    @bestamerica 7 лет назад

    '
    helicopter should NOT flying while heavy weather / windy

    • @daspilot8302
      @daspilot8302 7 лет назад

      bestamerica that's a 20knot wind sock. Only half inflated so 10-15 knot winds. If you think 10-15 knots is windy, I question where you live. When we fly it's always 10-15 knots...

    • @bestamerica
      @bestamerica 7 лет назад

      hi KM...
      dont use a word - YOU - on me...
      let explain about this helicopter and windy...
      bad heavy hurricane / tornado / twister / windy is a not good idea to fly the helicopter...
      save live and dont risk

    • @davefrance3721
      @davefrance3721 7 лет назад

      :-) Love it, that comment cheered me up...

    • @daspilot8302
      @daspilot8302 7 лет назад +1

      bestamerica hurricanes happen near the ocean for one.... and depending on the model of aircraft specific wind restrictions are determined by the manufacturer. I chose the word you because it was relevant to your geographical location as to what you consider high wind... EMS helicopters routinely fly in well over 20 knot wind. In fact, it's a non event. So, with that, what are your personal wind limitations for go/no go flights

    • @hudsondonnell444
      @hudsondonnell444 7 лет назад +1

      As this is Colorado the only weather conditions that would keep me from taking off would be a microburst, heavy downdrafts, or tornados in the vicinity. As this was not the case the fault lies with the deceased pilot.

  • @bullainsworth3130
    @bullainsworth3130 7 лет назад

    Looks like he pulled up on the collective and added throttle without countering with peddle.

    • @slayer8actual
      @slayer8actual 7 лет назад +1

      No. It was a hydraulic issue. It was found to be defective during the post-crash investigation. By the way, it's pedal, not peddle.

    • @hjackwingo
      @hjackwingo 7 лет назад

      Slayer Mack c

    • @forkster
      @forkster 7 лет назад +3

      Wish it was that simple. There was a hydraulic test lever the pilot didn't switch back on which meant no rear tail rotor hydraulics - hence why he lost control of the chopper. Also, the helicopter didn't have a self-sealing fuel tank due to some loophole. There was also no alarm to let the pilot know the test lever was left on as well... swiss cheese effect of safety holes strikes again. :(

    • @bullainsworth3130
      @bullainsworth3130 7 лет назад

      My spelling isn't really relevant to the discussion, but thanks anyway. I guess?

    • @bullainsworth3130
      @bullainsworth3130 7 лет назад +3

      Ed Reddy I see. Well it's a terrible thing either way. Hard to watch.

  • @Angry.General1461
    @Angry.General1461 6 лет назад

    1:06 poor RV! 😯

  • @ElementofKindness
    @ElementofKindness 7 лет назад

    "What the heck was he trying to do?"
    [reads description. Sees "airbus."]
    "Oh, well that explains things."
    Wonder if Airbus blames this one on the pilot too, for moving the rudder pedals too far during a takeoff?

    • @rocketraccoon1976
      @rocketraccoon1976 6 лет назад

      + Element of Kindness
      Pilot failed to switch the tail rotor hydraulics back on after a safety check. Pilot declined to do a hover check after takeoff.

  • @DiSwHiTeBoY2KrAzY
    @DiSwHiTeBoY2KrAzY 6 лет назад

    What is the point of this

  • @bradreambeault3584
    @bradreambeault3584 7 лет назад

    Plain and simple, pilot error. ( LTE ) loss of tail rotor effectiveness

    • @slayer8actual
      @slayer8actual 7 лет назад +2

      It was a mechanical malfunction, hydraulic problem, that could have been discovered if the pilot had done the required hover check prior to departure. So no, it wasn't a pilot error "plain and simple". It was a combination of mechanical malfunction and pilot error.

    • @bruce2357
      @bruce2357 7 лет назад +5

      Read the report, there was no mechanical malfunction, the pilot failed to return a switch back to the on position.

    • @ryanholmes8584
      @ryanholmes8584 6 лет назад

      It’s a loss of tail rotor control, since there were no hydraulics, due to the switch not being in the correct position, then there was no ability to change the pitch on the tail rotors. Loss of tail rotor effectiveness is an aerodynamic issue based on winds and altitude etc. the tail rotor was still performing as advertised, the pilot just had no way of controlling the blade pitch as it sounds from the report.

  • @loganadams6881
    @loganadams6881 7 лет назад +2

    too much money

    • @BluntForceTrauma666
      @BluntForceTrauma666 7 лет назад

      How much you wanna bet that wouldn't be your thought as one of them lands to either haul you or someone you care about to the hospital? Expensive for sure, but it gets you there _pronto..._

  • @ampledaps199
    @ampledaps199 7 лет назад +3

    turn the volume off. annoying voice over

    • @eds6889
      @eds6889 7 лет назад +7

      Ample Daps ... it's an accident report not entertainment.

    • @KandiKlover
      @KandiKlover 6 лет назад +2

      It was fine narration.

  • @ballingerfrench6304
    @ballingerfrench6304 7 лет назад +1

    @1:08 you can clearly see the pilot's head get ripped off immediately after the initial impact, and it goes flying off to the right of frame with part of the upper spinal column still attached, trailing a river of blood. This is good stuff! Back in the day, 'Faces of Death' did it for me, but now I'm getting addicted to the NTSB channel for my gore fix. THANK YOU so much for posting! More like this please, I'm subscribing.

    • @potatotrain2071
      @potatotrain2071 6 лет назад +10

      Ballinger French His head never flew off. He would die shortly after the crash due to blunt force trauma. Also, the stuff leaking out of the side of the helicopter was from the helicopter. Nice try being edgy, though.

    • @aSASa45454
      @aSASa45454 6 лет назад +3

      you're fucked up

    • @racerxxanadu250
      @racerxxanadu250 4 года назад

      That was my friend ya prick

    • @TheElkTeamwork
      @TheElkTeamwork 3 года назад

      GET WELL SOON.

    • @MichaelNelsonYT
      @MichaelNelsonYT Год назад

      As per the report:
      "A bystander pulled an occupant from the cockpit area. This occupant then rolled away
      from the helicopter area, and the bystander used a fire extinguisher to put out the fire
      around and on the occupant. (This occupant was later identified as the pilot.)"
      "The pilot, age 64, sustained blunt force and thermal injuries, including second- and
      third-degree skin burns and thermal lung injuries. He succumbed to his injuries about 75 minutes
      after the accident occurred"
      If his head is ripped off, how did he live for another hour? Please have some decency and respect.