Hi Class A Surfacing. Thank you so much for your videos. They are really of top quality with well detailed explanation. I just have one doubt over this 'bridge' feature. Since bridge is not able to create G3 surface, how can we use it to generate Class A Surface?
Hey Chelsea, It actually does do G3, you may not have a Studio license. And as far as G3 goes, it is only in certain cases G3 is needed. In most cases G2 is fine. The interior of a car will not have any G3 transitions. And only certain exterior transitions require that as well.
I have two bodies in a part file. I want to subtract one body from another to create an internal volume that perfection matches the subtracting tool body. When I use the SUBTRACT function, I keep getting an error that says, "Intersecting target and tool faces may have problems that cause intersections gaps. Examine Geometry can be used to find problematic faces." You can see in the two attached images which part is the tool and which part is the target, what setting I am using in the SUBTRACT operation, and then an image showing the error and the faces it is indicating are the problem. When I use Examine Geometry, per the error, the analysis does not highlight any problems. I'm super confused what to do here. I have tried increasing and decreasing the tolerance of the subtract. I have tried offsetting some of the faces so there is more and less interference between the two parts. I'd love it if anyone could provide some ideas how to work around this or solve it! I'm sorry that I cannot post the part file or show more detail of the design; it is very confidential.
+mark p A large part of what I do is show people how to simply use the tools. A lot of folks are simply grateful for that. I have no idea how you should use the tool in your day to day because I have no idea what you are designing and what standards you are designing to. I also have a lot of college students perusing these videos and PM'ing me there thanks. Most of them will use the tool how they see fit and couldn't care less about how I use the tool. I will eventually get to designing more parts. But I want people understanding the tool first.
+class A surfacing Knowing the tools is 90% of the battle in a design environment as feature rich as NX. Like most people, I have my standby features and with the deadlines, trying new things can be a bit time consuming, so it's always useful seeing some of the other tools at play. Keep up the good work. I'm sure there are others who appreciate the effort as much as I do.
+class A surfacing Knowing the tools is 90% of the battle in a design environment as feature rich as NX. Like most people, I have my standby features and with the deadlines, trying new things can be a bit time consuming, so it's always useful seeing some of the other tools at play. Keep up the good work. I'm sure there are others who appreciate the effort as much as I do.
AWESOME!!
Hi Class A Surfacing. Thank you so much for your videos. They are really of top quality with well detailed explanation. I just have one doubt over this 'bridge' feature. Since bridge is not able to create G3 surface, how can we use it to generate Class A Surface?
Hey Chelsea, It actually does do G3, you may not have a Studio license.
And as far as G3 goes, it is only in certain cases G3 is needed. In most cases G2 is fine. The interior of a car will not have any G3 transitions. And only certain exterior transitions require that as well.
thanks sir...,,,
I have two bodies in a part file. I want to subtract one body from another to create an internal volume that perfection matches the subtracting tool body. When I use the SUBTRACT function, I keep getting an error that says, "Intersecting target and tool faces may have problems that cause intersections gaps. Examine Geometry can be used to find problematic faces."
You can see in the two attached images which part is the tool and which part is the target, what setting I am using in the SUBTRACT operation, and then an image showing the error and the faces it is indicating are the problem.
When I use Examine Geometry, per the error, the analysis does not highlight any problems. I'm super confused what to do here. I have tried increasing and decreasing the tolerance of the subtract. I have tried offsetting some of the faces so there is more and less interference between the two parts.
I'd love it if anyone could provide some ideas how to work around this or solve it! I'm sorry that I cannot post the part file or show more detail of the design; it is very confidential.
а по русски?
try building something real instead of something that will never be used in real life
+mark p
A large part of what I do is show people how to simply use the tools. A lot of folks are simply grateful for that. I have no idea how you should use the tool in your day to day because I have no idea what you are designing and what standards you are designing to.
I also have a lot of college students perusing these videos and PM'ing me there thanks. Most of them will use the tool how they see fit and couldn't care less about how I use the tool.
I will eventually get to designing more parts. But I want people understanding the tool first.
+class A surfacing Knowing the tools is 90% of the battle in a design environment as feature rich as NX. Like most people, I have my standby features and with the deadlines, trying new things can be a bit time consuming, so it's always useful seeing some of the other tools at play. Keep up the good work. I'm sure there are others who appreciate the effort as much as I do.
+class A surfacing Knowing the tools is 90% of the battle in a design environment as feature rich as NX. Like most people, I have my standby features and with the deadlines, trying new things can be a bit time consuming, so it's always useful seeing some of the other tools at play. Keep up the good work. I'm sure there are others who appreciate the effort as much as I do.