I think Tyrion is my favorite. To be honest I still haven't watched seasons 5-8, but I currently rewatching the whole series to get to them (I dropped off in the wait between seasons). But as of now (season 4) I think Tyrion and Arya are tied for my favorites. I mean, don't get me wrong, Ser Pounce is a contender, but I just don't feel like he's given enough screen time to truly shine.
On honor in war, Jaavik from Mass Effect has a good quote: "Stand among the ashes of a trillion dead souls and ask them if honor matters? The silence is your answer."
You put a lot of research into this video. I am impressed. This deserves way more likes than it currently has. My favourite GOT Character is totally Tyrion. Witty man. My second would be Jaqen H'ghar, for the reasons stated in this video.
To me, the best example of a morally grey character in recent memory is Teresa in The Maze Runner series. Her motivation is to find a cure to the Flare...at any cost. This causes her to side with WCKD which is an organization willing to sacrifice immune children to produce a viable cure to save humanity. She hates watching her friends go through these absolutely traumatizing trials to become the cure, but not so much that she's willing to stop putting them through it. Because as she sees it, there will be a lot more lives lost if they don't find the cure. An unbreakable commitment to the "greater good" that causes her to do plenty of "bad" in order to achieve it. I love it.
oooh this is a really good example! I especially loved to see how they played the books vs the tv show to focus on that greyness in different ways. Death Cure movie vs book was especially interesting.
That was VERY interesting. Lots of informations and ideas to ponder. I'll need to watch this video some more times to fully absorb all of this. Thank you.
Yeah this one was pretty dense lol. On some of these I feel like I myself have to come rewatch them a month later because it's so much info to try to retain lol
I just found your channel today. Watched a few videos and now I'm already at the point where I hit like before the video even starts. I just know it's gonna be good.
I like to write about superheroes and so at first the title of this video was a turn off for me, but I watched anyway. Wow! You put a lot of work into this and I learned a lot. Superheroes in the real-world would be more grey than I usually see them. I don't watch Game of Thrones but I do own the books (I bought them on Google long ago). I'll have to sit down and read those. Thanks for making a great video with awesome information that had me laughing in places (like the trolley car).
I defenitely think black and white characters have benefits and have a strong place in fiction, and superhero stories can do that really well. Have you seen The Boys on Amazon? It only has one season out so far but it portrays superheroes in a gritty, realistic and very grey way that I found fascinating. Not a very inspiring story but it was interesting to see superheroes portrayed in such a dark light. But traditional more dark vs light hero stories are cool too. I personally love ones like Guardians of the Galaxy where there's a bit of silver grey. Game of thrones didn't grip me a ton the first time but this second watch through I find myself more interested. Last time I watched as a viewer though and this time I think I'm watching more as a creator which may be why, the added angle means there's a bit more to unpack and look for
True, Superman can do the right thing because he's in a world where doing the right thing is easy and has no repercussions. He never actively has to make a choice between what is right and what is necessary and live with it. It's easy to do good when there's no repercussions. He also never had to make the active choice of choosing to save people and condemn anyone to die. He never had to choose to actively let 5000 die to save 10000 or to try and save those people a the cost of others and had to live with it. Superman can save everyone and any blame is passed off, it was never his fault he couldn't save one group of people over another, it's always indirect and he is never seen actively choosing. he never has to let people die and live with the guilt of making the difficult choice. He also lacks a spine, he has all that power without the spine to use it, so he either actively ignores it, willfully chooses not to act and is therefore directly or indirectly complicit for inaction. There was a 1969 Justice League issue in which he refused to end the Vietnam War because it wasn't "Clear cut". For someone with his abilities if he knows about a massacre happening and refuses to step in to take sides it makes him impotent or spineless. If superheoes exist they would be shades of grey.
Tyrion and Arya are my favorites too (and I believe GRRM's as well). Jaime Lannister is a contender. Another excellent video as always! I really love this topic, as I love morally grey characters in general. I love Aletheia! I love the grey characters in Aletheia, but aside from that, the worldbuilding and the action. I cannot wait for Red River!
I think Tyrion is my favorite. To be honest I still haven't watched seasons 5-8, but I currently rewatching the whole series to get to them. But as of now (season 4) I think Tyrion and Arya are tied for my fava
So I'm actually going to take a different stance on this. Not that anything you said was wrong, just personal preference. I prefer when the protagonist/hero of a story is a morally white character by the climactic moment where their morality is tested. The character can start in a place of gray morality, but I like when they end up solidly good at the end. If the antagonist/villain is morally gray, fine. If several of the people and factions the main character has to deal with are morally gray, great. But I don't prefer that for my hero most of the time. You said that we like morally gray characters because we relate to them more, and that may be true, but I'm not necessarily looking for the protagonist who is the most relatable they can possibly be. Instead, I want to see characters who are BETTER than me, whose trials and revelations drive them to selflessly make the right decision when I don't know if I could have in the same situation. I can still relate very well to the character who struggles through their issues and the things the plot throws at them to ultimately become a morally pure character, even though they might be better than I am. It's a different sort of wish fulfillment, I guess. Also, I refuse to accept that everyone wants morally gray characters when Brandon Sanderson is as ridiculously popular as he is. Still enjoyed the video a lot! I'm intending to write a handful of morally gray people into my manuscript, with one of the primary antagonists as one of them--just not my heroes :)
While, generally speaking, I do prefer when a show explores moral ambiguity through grey characters (with different shades of gray, I guess). I do prefer when the hero is on the lighter side of this scale. I don't think I could truly root for a villain protagonist. But I still prefer when ethics and morals are chllenged, including/especially by the protagonists and heroes. I think it brings a lot of external and internal conflict when they are faced with hard choices to make, or with bad decisions, they made, etc. and have to deal with it and accept this part of themselves. That they are not perfect. And I agree that I don't think the majority of people do. Many (most?) people will look at a story with a "righteous" white and black morality. Just look at how everything gray character is quickly and blindly condemned and hated ...
This is something that confuses me all the time. No good character is all good or bad (for the most part) I'm writing about vampires, and not sure if my characters are gray or just evil.
I think Martin dosen't understand Lord of the Rings. It in fact perfectly fits into your description. You have the paragons of Goodness Aragorn and Gandalf and evil Incarnate Sauron. They are there, as you said, to measure against, while every, and I do mean every charcter is some shade of grey between them. Frodo obviously struglles, but even Sam, our dear Sam isn't perfect. His name is Samwise which comes from semi-wise, bacuase he is almost perfect, but simply can't emphisze with Smeagol, preventing (togheter with Faramir) his redemption. On the other end even the Witch King of Angmar was once a good Númenórian who got dragged into this by the Valar.
It is a Catus of the Felis genus, and this specific cat is formally referred to as a _ Stock Footage Cat_. All jokes aside I have lived with cats all my life and have a BS in biology, and to this day I only accept and recognize 3 cat breeds: 1) Squish Nose Cat 2) Naked Cat and 3) Savannah Cat, informally known as the I-Have-Made-A-Grave-Error-But-Regret-Nothing Cat
And then there's biblical good vs evil. Those fall into having a covenant relationship with Jesus (loving, depending on, and serving)- vs the absence of relationship with Jesus. Darkness being the absence or obstruction of light. So then everything we naturally do is evil under this belief.
Great and Informative video! I will get inspo out of this cuz I am currently writing for a VtM Char and I want it to have complexity, flaws, and spice to it. I was just looking up for how to make a good and humane character who's developing in my story hehehe..
I'm so happy you found the video helpful!! I love grey characters to no end and really do think the flaws add a lot of spice to them. Good luck with your characters and story ❤
I really also find this video amusing and Im really glad I found this! With all the editing and clips added, HAHAHA it makes me feel entertained, laugh, and cheerful.. 24 mins of this video was so awesome! Way to go! I got a lot from this better than my Philosophy class lmaoo
@@CloudKitten mine too! i initially watched Shaelin's video (as you do...) on morally ambiguous characters (for the 50392482471th time (...yeah i said 1th, what of it?)) and i was like "hmm, who else has what to say about this?" and after a couple of really dumb and basic b versions of this discussion, i came across yours and i was like W E L P.
You don't have to be on the most evil extreme or on the best extreme to not be morally grey. The moral greyness comes from overlapping of contradictory motives and execution, and the blending of the good and the bad. IE doing evil things for pure reasons, or pure things for evil reasons, or in the true chaotic fashion, doing some pure and some evil depending on the moment or day. Zuko's actions rarely (if ever) had blending within the action, moment, or mind-set itself, but rather started on one side of the spectrum and jumped to the other, which makes him black and white.
That's awesome! What class if you don't mind me asking? Did the teacher send you the link to the video? Hopefully you found it helpful and at least a little entertaining
Cloud Kitten! I've got a scenario for you. So I am writing a story in which there is a deity that was locked away long ago due to a prophecy saying this deity is destined to eat the world because of its overwhelming hunger. One mortal is tasked with feeding this deity to keep it at bay from destroying the world. My protagonist kills the person feeding this deity due to vengeful motivations, unaware of this person's responsibilities to this deity, and must now take up the mantle of the feeder. They kill bad people, and they take enjoyment in it (this is evident through the fact that these bad people are responsible for killing the protagonist's family, but they also keep the heads of the people they kill as trophies). How would you categorize my protagonist in terms of moral greyness? On one hand, they're killing people, but those people are "bad" and killing them prevents the end of the world. I'm very curious to hear your take on this
I forgot to mention that this deity feeds off of human life and that is why my protagonist is killing these people, they are feeding them to this deity
Hmm, that's a tricky one. I think it would really come down to presentation and how you explore their thoughts on the matter. Morality is almost always a spectrum in characters, so I'd say they have some greyness. But where it is on the spectrum between charcoal and a lighter grey would come down to their thoughts on the situation. For example, would they be killing these people if they hadn't needed to take the mantel of feeder? Is the task all joy, or is there some sacrifice to it? If they would be doing the killings in the absence of the diety and or threat posed by these bad people, then their motives are somewhat selfish and they fall mostly on the side of villany, but if they are motivated in some part by the lives they'll save, that makes them more grey. Really moral greyness (in my opinion) is all about the character's actions, motives, and what they hope to achieve. It isn't about setup or outcome, but rather, what they decide to do in the space between. So where this character falls on the spectrum will be entirely dependent on how your portray their handling of this complex situation. Ps: your premise sounds interesting!
@@CloudKitten Thank you! I’m in the early phases of developing this story, and I’m still a little insecure to even share it. Thank you so much for your feedback! I love the opinions of fellow writers and lovers of intriguing stories and characters
In the trolley problem, I would choose to do nothing. Why? If I choose, then I have made a conscious decision to murder one, or five, people. By not choosing, I have left it up to fate. How's that for morally grey?
But chosing to do nothing is a choice . . . The trolley problem in its traditional version is that the trolley is headed towards 5 people and there's a lever you can pull to redirect it towards one. You have two options, do nothing or pull the lever. You would choose to do nothing which isn't wrong (there's no objective right or wrong in this problem) but it is a decision that has implications. Both options are morally grey and there are only two options.
@@CloudKitten There is always the choice of pushing everybody off both tracks! Then, everybody lives and a normal human could easily yell "Look out! Trolley's coming!!"
I like to watch all types of RUclips videos so I can try to keep my editing style unique and fresh, from Unnus Annus to Film Theory to Film Riot to Hello Future me. Not always consistently, but I sort of spiral around. But my husband has been following Pewds since back before he was big so I end up exposed to a lot of his content that way because it's playing in the background lol Is math related to science? Only if butt is legs.
I think Tyrion is my favorite. To be honest I still haven't watched seasons 5-8, but I currently rewatching the whole series to get to them (I dropped off in the wait between seasons). But as of now (season 4) I think Tyrion and Arya are tied for my favorites. I mean, don't get me wrong, Ser Pounce is a contender, but I just don't feel like he's given enough screen time to truly shine.
On honor in war, Jaavik from Mass Effect has a good quote: "Stand among the ashes of a trillion dead souls and ask them if honor matters? The silence is your answer."
You put a lot of research into this video. I am impressed. This deserves way more likes than it currently has. My favourite GOT Character is totally Tyrion. Witty man. My second would be Jaqen H'ghar, for the reasons stated in this video.
I came to write this exact comment, thus I upvote you!
To me, the best example of a morally grey character in recent memory is Teresa in The Maze Runner series.
Her motivation is to find a cure to the Flare...at any cost. This causes her to side with WCKD which is an organization willing to sacrifice immune children to produce a viable cure to save humanity. She hates watching her friends go through these absolutely traumatizing trials to become the cure, but not so much that she's willing to stop putting them through it. Because as she sees it, there will be a lot more lives lost if they don't find the cure.
An unbreakable commitment to the "greater good" that causes her to do plenty of "bad" in order to achieve it.
I love it.
oooh this is a really good example! I especially loved to see how they played the books vs the tv show to focus on that greyness in different ways. Death Cure movie vs book was especially interesting.
That was VERY interesting. Lots of informations and ideas to ponder. I'll need to watch this video some more times to fully absorb all of this. Thank you.
Yeah this one was pretty dense lol. On some of these I feel like I myself have to come rewatch them a month later because it's so much info to try to retain lol
Cool new channel I found. You give valid and fun points. I hope you don't mind i'm using you good advice for my Ben 10 fanfiction.
I just found your channel today. Watched a few videos and now I'm already at the point where I hit like before the video even starts. I just know it's gonna be good.
Thank you! That's so nice to hear, and I really appreciate you taking the time to leave a comment
Thank you for the research you put in for this video. I have visited many "complex character' videos and this for me ranks top. Thanks.
Thank you so much for this lovely comment! It makes all the work worth it to know it's helped someone out. I really had a lot of fun making this one.
I like to write about superheroes and so at first the title of this video was a turn off for me, but I watched anyway. Wow! You put a lot of work into this and I learned a lot. Superheroes in the real-world would be more grey than I usually see them. I don't watch Game of Thrones but I do own the books (I bought them on Google long ago). I'll have to sit down and read those. Thanks for making a great video with awesome information that had me laughing in places (like the trolley car).
I defenitely think black and white characters have benefits and have a strong place in fiction, and superhero stories can do that really well. Have you seen The Boys on Amazon? It only has one season out so far but it portrays superheroes in a gritty, realistic and very grey way that I found fascinating. Not a very inspiring story but it was interesting to see superheroes portrayed in such a dark light. But traditional more dark vs light hero stories are cool too. I personally love ones like Guardians of the Galaxy where there's a bit of silver grey.
Game of thrones didn't grip me a ton the first time but this second watch through I find myself more interested. Last time I watched as a viewer though and this time I think I'm watching more as a creator which may be why, the added angle means there's a bit more to unpack and look for
True, Superman can do the right thing because he's in a world where doing the right thing is easy and has no repercussions. He never actively has to make a choice between what is right and what is necessary and live with it. It's easy to do good when there's no repercussions. He also never had to make the active choice of choosing to save people and condemn anyone to die. He never had to choose to actively let 5000 die to save 10000 or to try and save those people a the cost of others and had to live with it. Superman can save everyone and any blame is passed off, it was never his fault he couldn't save one group of people over another, it's always indirect and he is never seen actively choosing. he never has to let people die and live with the guilt of making the difficult choice. He also lacks a spine, he has all that power without the spine to use it, so he either actively ignores it, willfully chooses not to act and is therefore directly or indirectly complicit for inaction. There was a 1969 Justice League issue in which he refused to end the Vietnam War because it wasn't "Clear cut". For someone with his abilities if he knows about a massacre happening and refuses to step in to take sides it makes him impotent or spineless. If superheoes exist they would be shades of grey.
It's like having an omelet without the ugliness of breaking the eggs to make them.
First vid - can’t wait to binge all your others!
That's awesome! I hope you find them helpful
Tyrion and Arya are my favorites too (and I believe GRRM's as well). Jaime Lannister is a contender. Another excellent video as always! I really love this topic, as I love morally grey characters in general. I love Aletheia! I love the grey characters in Aletheia, but aside from that, the worldbuilding and the action. I cannot wait for Red River!
I still like really Tyrion. Dany and Sansa are cool too (I read the books lol)
I think Tyrion is my favorite. To be honest I still haven't watched seasons 5-8, but I currently rewatching the whole series to get to them. But as of now (season 4) I think Tyrion and Arya are tied for my fava
You did your homework so good, A+. I'm subscribing.
Not even watched the video but seeing Joffrey Baratheon in the thumbnail of a video on moral ambiguity got me PISSED off
I'M ALWAYS LOST
man, this was great! good job
I agree with your analysis of Zuko.
So I'm actually going to take a different stance on this. Not that anything you said was wrong, just personal preference.
I prefer when the protagonist/hero of a story is a morally white character by the climactic moment where their morality is tested. The character can start in a place of gray morality, but I like when they end up solidly good at the end. If the antagonist/villain is morally gray, fine. If several of the people and factions the main character has to deal with are morally gray, great. But I don't prefer that for my hero most of the time.
You said that we like morally gray characters because we relate to them more, and that may be true, but I'm not necessarily looking for the protagonist who is the most relatable they can possibly be. Instead, I want to see characters who are BETTER than me, whose trials and revelations drive them to selflessly make the right decision when I don't know if I could have in the same situation. I can still relate very well to the character who struggles through their issues and the things the plot throws at them to ultimately become a morally pure character, even though they might be better than I am. It's a different sort of wish fulfillment, I guess.
Also, I refuse to accept that everyone wants morally gray characters when Brandon Sanderson is as ridiculously popular as he is.
Still enjoyed the video a lot! I'm intending to write a handful of morally gray people into my manuscript, with one of the primary antagonists as one of them--just not my heroes :)
While, generally speaking, I do prefer when a show explores moral ambiguity through grey characters (with different shades of gray, I guess). I do prefer when the hero is on the lighter side of this scale. I don't think I could truly root for a villain protagonist. But I still prefer when ethics and morals are chllenged, including/especially by the protagonists and heroes. I think it brings a lot of external and internal conflict when they are faced with hard choices to make, or with bad decisions, they made, etc. and have to deal with it and accept this part of themselves. That they are not perfect.
And I agree that I don't think the majority of people do.
Many (most?) people will look at a story with a "righteous" white and black morality. Just look at how everything gray character is quickly and blindly condemned and hated ...
This is something that confuses me all the time. No good character is all good or bad (for the most part) I'm writing about vampires, and not sure if my characters are gray or just evil.
Great video! Very informative, thank you.
Very welcome!
Jaime lannister: "Hold my 🍺"
I think Martin dosen't understand Lord of the Rings. It in fact perfectly fits into your description. You have the paragons of Goodness Aragorn and Gandalf and evil Incarnate Sauron. They are there, as you said, to measure against, while every, and I do mean every charcter is some shade of grey between them. Frodo obviously struglles, but even Sam, our dear Sam isn't perfect. His name is Samwise which comes from semi-wise, bacuase he is almost perfect, but simply can't emphisze with Smeagol, preventing (togheter with Faramir) his redemption. On the other end even the Witch King of Angmar was once a good Númenórian who got dragged into this by the Valar.
YOU NEED MORE VIEWS
This comment made my morning ❤ it's going right into the folder that I dip into when I need help getting through the long editing sessions
a great review ❤
Love the channel. What kind of cat is the grey kitten in the beginning?
It is a Catus of the Felis genus, and this specific cat is formally referred to as a _ Stock Footage Cat_.
All jokes aside I have lived with cats all my life and have a BS in biology, and to this day I only accept and recognize 3 cat breeds:
1) Squish Nose Cat
2) Naked Cat
and 3) Savannah Cat, informally known as the I-Have-Made-A-Grave-Error-But-Regret-Nothing Cat
And then there's biblical good vs evil.
Those fall into having a covenant relationship with Jesus (loving, depending on, and serving)- vs the absence of relationship with Jesus. Darkness being the absence or obstruction of light.
So then everything we naturally do is evil under this belief.
Great and Informative video! I will get inspo out of this cuz I am currently writing for a VtM Char and I want it to have complexity, flaws, and spice to it. I was just looking up for how to make a good and humane character who's developing in my story hehehe..
I'm so happy you found the video helpful!! I love grey characters to no end and really do think the flaws add a lot of spice to them. Good luck with your characters and story ❤
I really also find this video amusing and Im really glad I found this! With all the editing and clips added, HAHAHA it makes me feel entertained, laugh, and cheerful.. 24 mins of this video was so awesome! Way to go! I got a lot from this better than my Philosophy class lmaoo
I need that alignment chart 🤣🤣
Tyrion, Arya and Sam... always
Good video.
For morality there is also divind command theory and natural law
I'll have to look these up. Thanks for mentioning them!
this was fucking phenomenal.
sub'd. bell smashed.
Sub AND bell??? You are my new favorite
@@CloudKitten mine too! i initially watched Shaelin's video (as you do...) on morally ambiguous characters (for the 50392482471th time (...yeah i said 1th, what of it?)) and i was like "hmm, who else has what to say about this?" and after a couple of really dumb and basic b versions of this discussion, i came across yours and i was like W E L P.
So they are multi-dimensional
Zuko wasn't ever quite 100% evil, if he were he would have killed Aang when he Captured him in Siege of The North.
You don't have to be on the most evil extreme or on the best extreme to not be morally grey. The moral greyness comes from overlapping of contradictory motives and execution, and the blending of the good and the bad. IE doing evil things for pure reasons, or pure things for evil reasons, or in the true chaotic fashion, doing some pure and some evil depending on the moment or day. Zuko's actions rarely (if ever) had blending within the action, moment, or mind-set itself, but rather started on one side of the spectrum and jumped to the other, which makes him black and white.
Ok here Bc my class I don’t know nothing
That's awesome! What class if you don't mind me asking? Did the teacher send you the link to the video? Hopefully you found it helpful and at least a little entertaining
Kant = k'a'nt as in b'a'll or Ball 🏀🏈
If that Altruism is genuine intrinsically then it must be true.
Cloud Kitten! I've got a scenario for you. So I am writing a story in which there is a deity that was locked away long ago due to a prophecy saying this deity is destined to eat the world because of its overwhelming hunger. One mortal is tasked with feeding this deity to keep it at bay from destroying the world. My protagonist kills the person feeding this deity due to vengeful motivations, unaware of this person's responsibilities to this deity, and must now take up the mantle of the feeder. They kill bad people, and they take enjoyment in it (this is evident through the fact that these bad people are responsible for killing the protagonist's family, but they also keep the heads of the people they kill as trophies). How would you categorize my protagonist in terms of moral greyness? On one hand, they're killing people, but those people are "bad" and killing them prevents the end of the world. I'm very curious to hear your take on this
I forgot to mention that this deity feeds off of human life and that is why my protagonist is killing these people, they are feeding them to this deity
Hmm, that's a tricky one. I think it would really come down to presentation and how you explore their thoughts on the matter. Morality is almost always a spectrum in characters, so I'd say they have some greyness. But where it is on the spectrum between charcoal and a lighter grey would come down to their thoughts on the situation. For example, would they be killing these people if they hadn't needed to take the mantel of feeder? Is the task all joy, or is there some sacrifice to it? If they would be doing the killings in the absence of the diety and or threat posed by these bad people, then their motives are somewhat selfish and they fall mostly on the side of villany, but if they are motivated in some part by the lives they'll save, that makes them more grey.
Really moral greyness (in my opinion) is all about the character's actions, motives, and what they hope to achieve. It isn't about setup or outcome, but rather, what they decide to do in the space between. So where this character falls on the spectrum will be entirely dependent on how your portray their handling of this complex situation.
Ps: your premise sounds interesting!
@@CloudKitten Thank you! I’m in the early phases of developing this story, and I’m still a little insecure to even share it. Thank you so much for your feedback! I love the opinions of fellow writers and lovers of intriguing stories and characters
In the trolley problem, I would choose to do nothing. Why? If I choose, then I have made a conscious decision to murder one, or five, people. By not choosing, I have left it up to fate. How's that for morally grey?
But chosing to do nothing is a choice . . . The trolley problem in its traditional version is that the trolley is headed towards 5 people and there's a lever you can pull to redirect it towards one. You have two options, do nothing or pull the lever. You would choose to do nothing which isn't wrong (there's no objective right or wrong in this problem) but it is a decision that has implications. Both options are morally grey and there are only two options.
@@CloudKitten There is always the choice of pushing everybody off both tracks! Then, everybody lives and a normal human could easily yell "Look out! Trolley's coming!!"
Never expected you to be a pewdiepie fan loool
I like to watch all types of RUclips videos so I can try to keep my editing style unique and fresh, from Unnus Annus to Film Theory to Film Riot to Hello Future me. Not always consistently, but I sort of spiral around. But my husband has been following Pewds since back before he was big so I end up exposed to a lot of his content that way because it's playing in the background lol Is math related to science? Only if butt is legs.
@@CloudKitten Seems like everyone on youtube is like that. Don't really watch pewds content myself just really like the guy
This hurts my brain
In a good way I hope
First!
How the living feck does this have only 7k views?
Edit: nevermind just reminded myself that people =/= stupid. Too many long words here lol
💀
ARe you single? I love you Kitten!