Looking Back at The Time Lindros Was Traded Twice in the Same Day, By the Same Team
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 фев 2025
- It was such a massive deal the Nords liked so much, they made it twice.
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @thehockeyguy
(Updated) Use the code "thgsentme" on Bench Clearers for 15% off:: benchclearers....
Order jerseys from Ben H Sports while saving 10% off the listed eBay prices by sending him an email regarding jerseys you spot in his listings. ben.hoogenband@yahoo.ca Just tell him Shannon sent you.
Support The Hockey Guy via Patreon / thehockeyguy
Join the Discord server:
discord.com/in...
/ youtubehockeyguy
Follow me on Twitter: @thgofyoutube
Instagram: thgshannon
TheHockeyGuy.yt@gmail.com
Contact me via snail mail at:
The Hockey Guy
PO Box 15038 Seven Oaks PO
Abbotsford, BC
V2S 8P1
In the USA:
Shannon Skanes
1125 Fir Avenue
Suite 119
Blaine, WA 98230
As an Avs fan, every element of this video is pleasing. Especially since Forsberg wasn’t on the initial trade list. It’s crazy when you see GM’s give up the farm for one guy as it usually works out much better for the team getting the haul.
The trade! ruclips.net/video/mM7D2WTX2QA/видео.html
Exactly and then sakic did the same thing almost 30 years later when he traded duschene for basically two team’s entire farm systems. Funny how history repeats itself
I'm a lifelong Flyers fan and I was a kid when we traded for Lindros and of course loved it, and I'm still a huge Big E fan ... but just imagine if we didn't include Peter Forsberg ... a team that had Eric Lindros, Peter Forsberg, & Rod Brind'amour at Center - the superstar "Power Forward", the superstar Swedish skillman, and one of the best two-way Centermen in the game ... what a difference the 90s and 200s would have been lol.
I could sit down and listen to Shannon talk about hockey for a whole day and love every second of it.
This.
For sure one of the things I wish I had in my life. Somebody I could talk to about hockey like every day, I think it's more likely to get rich and happily married, atleast where I'm from.
@SWE Dreamhack same here bud, I live in Tucson, AZ. What about you?
Excellent for daily chronic pain situation …
thats my dream
Lindros was always great to the neighborhood kids when he was a Flyer. Playing roller hockey and foot hockey in front of his house. Good guy to everyone at MSG when he was a player as well. Very sad he had those concussions.
My grandma used to call him "little Eric" when she baby sat the Lindros kids. I did a double take when I realized who she was talking about 😀
That's cool that she knew the legend.
Did she get body checked when he didn't get his way?
WHAT???
Eric was a specimen even as a kid
It's funny how history repeats itself. Duchene, much like Lindros didn't want to play for a bad team and yet both times they were wrong and the Avs ended up better after they left.
Sad to say without that trade happening, Colorado doesn't get Roy, Forsberg or Ricci when it comes time to hoist the Cup in 96. I believe Chris Simon was apart of those Future Considerations that Quebec got in return who was also apart of that 96 Cup winning team
Yes, Chris Simon was part of that trade.
ok for lack of argument how did lindros lead to the Roy trade? he was a have that refused to play for the have after their couch went stupid. (not pulling a goalie after 9 goals)
As a (former?) Avs fan, this trade is one the best in history. Any Flyers fan that has looked into what players you traded away or didn't draft over the years overall? Heart attack invoking when you put it all together.
I'm quite sure any Flyers fan is aware of what was involved. After Gretzky going to LA, this is the biggest trade in the history of the league and certainly the biggest in Flyers history
Giving up so much for a player that hadn't played a game...
@@MrOctober44 I wanted to argue with you about it being the second biggest trade of all time, but honestly I couldn't think of anything. Certainly the biggest of my life time.
Forsberg and Lindros are on the same level. Just one of them had other hall of famers around them to help them win while they were healthy.
The Steve Dangle trade tree made me realize just how huge this (and the Gretz trade) were in causing just a massive amount of changing influence in the league
Steven Dangle made a trade tree video on this trade. There are still some active pieces of this happening today. And it’s incredible what the Avs were able to do after this trade.
This trade tree actually died... The Wayne Gretzky one however is still alive from 88
Lindros didn’t want to sign with Quebec because Marcel Aubut, during a visit with the family before the draft, insulted Lindros’ mother in French not realizing she spoke the language and understood him. Can’t blame him - I know I wouldn’t have played for an owner like that, either. Also, combine that with the fact that the Nordiques had the #1 pick in three drafts in a row.
First time I heard of this!
As a 33 yo avs fan this is awesome info, thanks man!!
I heard the insult was of a sexual nature. This is why Lindros doesn't speak Aubut's name to this day
The first time you were able 🎉 you going back in in aAaaaav
well qbc ended up winning in the long run. hack lindros ended up an over paid speed bumb
I think the Nordiques had to draft Lindros, even knowing he wouldn't play. The bounty for trading him made it worth the risk. As it turned out the Nordiques/Avalanche easily won that deal in the long term.
Lindros must've been gutted Toronto had traded the pick that would've made him a Leaf. Rangers would've been trading away a cup right there.
Not close to the same level, but brings to my mind the Duchene trade. I couldn't believe that haul when it happened and still can't now. Do we see Avalanche where they are without that deal? Maybe, but boy did it help keep things rolling.
@@closethockeyfan5284 The salary cap has restricted bonkers trades. I remember Toronto fleecing Calgary for Gilmour in return for some magic beans. I miss crazy GM's!
@@1bert719 Toronto never had that pick.
@@SverigeiSverige They traded it previously for Tom Kurvers.
@@1bert719 that was to NJ who took Scott Niedermayer.
It would be pretty funny if Shannon did a video about the career of Future Considerations
This content is how I discovered the channel (the Gretzky to Vancouver video) and stayed for everything else. Brilliant stuff. I'd forgotten about the Rangers proposal to the Flyers.
Enjoyed watching this. I remember the Lindros affair very well. I didn't know what the Rangers had offered. Sometimes the best trades are the ones you don't make.
Off the top of my head it was Kovalev Amonte Weight Vanbiesbrouck + Money and picks. The proposed trade that Shanon mentioned is not how I remember it at all.
Two teams ended up winning Cups because of this day. The Rangers won because they didn't give up Alexei Kovalev which helped them win the 1994 Cup, and the Colorado Avalanche of course got Ricci, Forsberg, and the pick that became Thibault who they traded for Patrick Roy
The only other athlete I can recall who refused to play for the team that drafted him, iirc, was Eli Manning when he was taken by the Chargers. Ended up working out for him, at least.
Just wanna say how much I appreciate your awesome hockey content. I admire how much you love the game.
I love these Lindros videos. Fascinating player. Thank you.
Guy Lafleur said Aubut had made a comment about Lindros' mother in french, not knowing she was bilingual. Given Aubut's sexual harrassment lawsuit later, it seems plausible.
Page was dealing with the Flyers, Aubut was dealing with the Rangers. That's how they ended up with two deals. This proved to be the motivation for creating the 'Trade Call' portion of a deal. TSN broke it down in the 20-year anniversary.
My favorite Flyers jersey. They looked so fresh. John LeClair and Lindros were some of the reasons I got into hockey. That said… lets go Preds!
The best looking jersey ever in the picture.
I loved Lindros. His Jersey was the first I owned. Every year my former boss gets a signed photo of Lindros, frames it, and gives it to me for Christmas.
The best looking jersey ever in the picture.
Excellent video. You're in the zone with this.
Got one of my favorite players out of that deal in forsberg and Jocelyn worked out well in helping get a trade done for Roy....was too young at the time to understand (5) but looking back as an AVS fan, they won that trade no doubt
its crazy to think two of the biggest trades of all time where made by one team, and no one can say they didnt do amazing in those trades id take forsberg over lindros any day, got to see a aves game and peter had 3 goals and 3 assists and he was hitting everything and the other team being dallas couldnt get the puck away from him and if they double teamed him sakic was there to take the puck and they had tangay on the same line they had 6 goals during that game
I remember being in Lindros' camp at that draft. I can't remember specifics, to be honest, but I had a distinct dislike for both Aubut and Page, I think the team under performed, I don't think their player development with lower picks (the top picks any of us could have made they were no brainers) or something along those lines. The irony is that in avoiding bad management at the draft, he ended up with Bobby Clark. Out of the frying pan....
had to laugh out loud at "Peter Forsberg... he's pretty good"
God, the Lindros Trade Deal was -the- trade that made the Avalanche. That first season doesn't happen without this trade.
Another quality video on this topic is Steve Dangle's video 'Trade Tree'.
If the flyers don't make this trade do you think they win a cup with them pieces that they gave away?
The trade, that John Elway influenced, that gave Nordiques/Avs fans Forsberg. Love it!!!! Thank you Lindros! You fit much better in Philly. Sad you never won a cup.
The true architect of the late 90s and early 2000s Avalanche was Eric Lindros.
The true architect of the current Avalanche is Matt Duchene.
Also congrats on 240k Shannon! You are THE man! I’ve been subbed since 2017, I have so much respect for the way you have stayed true to yourself.
can you do a GM Career overview vid of Pierre Gauthier ?
2:00...Back in 1984 when Mario was drafted not only wouldn't he put the Penguins Jersey on but refused to shake hands with Penguins GM too.
I wish I could trade players twice in NHL 22.
How about a video about what the heck "Future Considerations" actual means and what it has ever paid off as?
Is anyone noticing the gritty doll at the top of the board? Nice little add on to the board Shannon!
When the Nordiques left... it happened over night from my recollection. They just upped and moved.
I enjoy the little Gritty on the top of the white board
I think you have 240,000 hockey friends you should make a list....lol 😄😄😄😄 great job as always
You should do a video on the infamous part time owner of the Islanders
There's a 30 For 30 about that guy, BIG SHOT!
I know Peter Forsberg will be the best player I ever saw, even as a no goodnick Avs fan who found hockey in 1995-6, 21 means 21
Peter Forsberg straight up for Lindros and the Nordiques still win the trade. People think Lindros is the ultimate what if story without the injuries didn’t follow Forsbergs career closely enough. Avs would have won 3 cups if he was mostly healthy.
Has a young Nordique fan in the 90s, I remembers that Aubut selling the teams wasn't a sure thing.
But the second that the Qc gouvernment said it wasn't paying for a new arena things unfolded pretty quickly and we didn't even have a chance to say goodbye to the team.
Combine that most of the media coverage here was in french, probably that why you didn't heard that much about it compare to the jets.
Note that they were rumors that some of the part owner wanted to buy aubut share to keep the team in place, but the comcast deal happened so fast they didn't had time to come up the capital.
Oh, and one more thing you forgot to mention: the referendum completely dominated the province's media. The Nordiques were seen as the Oui team and the Oui side saw losing the team as a lost cause / worthy sacrifice for Quebec's independence. Instead they lost both.
The Red Wings didn't mind beating Lindros and the Flyers for the Stanley Cup, either!
The Red Wings probably didn't appreciate the guys who were traded to the Nordiques helping stomp them in the 95-96 western conference finals.
@@Nacnud92 yeah what about it?
I'm a Wings fan. If the lindros trade pans out differently perhaps things in 96 are different.
@@Nacnud92 and you forgot 2002.
Video idea: most hyped 1st overall picks of all time
You can talk about what was expected before the draft, what their perceived strengths were, did the players ever live up to the hype, etc
Examples: Gretzky, Lemieux, Lindros, Crosby, Ovechkin, etc and you can throw in some busts in there too
Keep up the good work
Huge moment in my hockey fandom!
As an Avs fan, I can speculate that this moment lead to the creation of the colorado avalanche. Maybe if lindros stayed with Quebec, that things would've worked out differently? Thank you Eric!!
When I think of Lindros, I think of Elway, he pulled the same scam refusing to play for the team that drafted him. Amazingly it benefited Denver fans in BOTH cases!
I understand players wanting to choose their team/employer but it just can't work in pro sports. No one good would ever play for the small markets or losing teams. The draft is a necessary evil.
I always thought less of Lindros(and Elway)[and Manning] for doing this. I don't know anything about WHY it was done, but I have nothing but negative suspicions about the why and they mostly evolve around money. I remember Lindros being featured uniquely in the sports trading card world(Score) when he was drafted. I'm sure he made a lot of money on that deal too.
San Jose drafted Pat Falloon with the #2 pick after Quebec. It’s safe to say there was a big drop off in talent that year after Lindros…he was the clear cut #1 guy that year.
Two years earlier in the NFL, a similar thing occurred when the Dallas Cowboys traded Herschel Walker to Minnesota (details here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herschel_Walker_trade)
So since then, the smart money says, "If you have a choice between having one great player or a bunch of draft picks, go with the draft picks."
I do remember at the time Lindros was reported saying he would like to play on the Blackhawks. But he also was reported saying he didn't want to play on a Canadian team because endorsement deals in the U.S. were more lucrative. I always thought the Chicago statement was just the team reporter he was talking with. That he would take any American team just insert the city who he was doing an interview with.
Amazing to think how things would’ve been different if the Rangers trade had gone through instead. Maybe my Avs don’t go to glory in 1996 either, considering they wouldn’t have had Forsberg, and perhaps they wouldn’t have made the Roy trade, and we all know that he was also instrumental in the Avs’ success. I’m sure glad things worked out how they did.
The Aubut era Nordiques were such a gong show. Little wonder Lindros didn't want anything to do with him and thus the Nordiques as a result.
Only thing missing is The Unknown Coach, a flashing Jaye P Morgan, and GENE GENE THE SKATING MACHINE!!!!
The Rangers deal was Tony Amonte, Doug Weight, Alexei Kovalev, John Vanbiesbrouck, 1st round picks in 1993, 1994, 1996 and cash. Vanbiesbrouck was trying to become a free agent that summer. He had an arbitration case. IF VBK became a free agent, James Patrick was going to Quebec in place of VBK.
not just beezer but kovalev came up in those playoffs! Amonte trade brought in graves to i believe?
Shannon’s history videos + Gritty plush = P E R F E C T I O N
Sooo entertaining to listen about Eric L. deal! Enjoy these facts. Excellent job! 👏 👏
I 110% agree if NYR traded for Lindros there would be no 1994. As a fan of 90's Van, it's sad it didn't happen. I guess there are many older NYI fans that agree.
Lol. That's for sure.
Fishsticks gonna Fishstick
Great video but my recollection of events was that Eric’s helicoptering-parents, Carl and Bonnie, were his original agents and were way over their heads. A classic example of why not to mix business and blood.
That “Future Considerations” bit was wonderful
Lindros really had a point about not wanting to go Quebec. It was amateur hour with the franchise. Look at what happened...they trade him twice. All kinds of rules were put in place because of this situation
He said it's only because he didn't like the coach at the time. Québec has a huge hockey market and people kept going fully to the games. The only reason that they left Québec is because they lacked parterships.
Lindros also refused to go to the Junior team that drafted him.
as a ranger happy to trade them for Eric, our team is still, vanbies, beuke, lowe, zubov leetch, messier graves gartner, lindros tikky and larmer, thats a pretty good team. The only one i miss is kovalev
Reminds me of that trade between the marlins and blue jays
Pretty sure Richter and Vanbiesbrouk literally rotated games all season long and the playoff starter was an unknown until seasons end.
Richter and Leetch were unreal for them but I could easily picture that Vanbiesbrouck and Leetch are the heroes in an alternate universe
In a interview, Lindros declare that he doesn't want to play for Marcel Aubut, and years later, Marcel was in a scandal about Sexual harassement.
Don't know if it was knew in the 90, but I still respect Lindros to refuse to play for him.
He was known to screw people in business at that time. It's later that we found out he wasn't the kind of guy to wear pants in office meetings.
Another example with holding out is Cal Peterson not wanting to play in Buffalo. There is a feeling that he wanted big market as he now plays in LA.
To answer the question you ask at the end of the video, here's how it likely happened:
They (the Nordiques) were in talk with many teams for Lindros, including the Flyers and Rangers. The Rangers deal was likely the Nordiques' latest counter offer, that the Rangers had previously declined. Say, for example, that they had made an offer similar to the one you had on the board, but with another players instead of Amonte. The Nordiques say, "throw in Amonte instead of X and we have a deal." Rangers decline. Then the Nordiques come to an agreement with the Flyers. But then the phone rings, it's the Rangers, they're willing to throw in Amonte now, and the Nordiques prefer that deal.
Chaos/hilarity ensues.
Now I'm not saying it WAS Amonte, I just used him as an example of how it is very likely to have played out. It was most likely the Rangers who, at the last minute, agreed to Quebec's latest demands, just after Quebec had agreed to a deal with the Flyers, that they then tried to walk back from.
It's weird when you look back at the early days of the NHL, 1920's & 30's, just about every trade involved cash. Of course there were no draft picks back then.
I think the 2 trades part makes it clear why Lindros was apprehensive about playing under Aubut.
i would be interested to see if the report Flyers trade or the rangers trade would still bring the Avs a cup
A forward line, a defense pair, a goalie, a pick and cash for Lindros. Twice. Cool times.
And now what you get for Eichel...
Future video topic(April 1st)
Career video for Future Considerations
Lindros and his family did this in the OHL as well. He didn't want to go to Soo. Gretz talked to him about the Soo. Probably why the big baby didn't like Gretz. Lindros us the worst HOF there is.
Lindros should have said he would have no problem playing for the Habs. I think that would have quelled some of the anger among French Canadians.
In hindsight, this should’ve been a Lindros for Forsberg, 1 for 1 trade
Lindros’ career took off when the Flyers traded Recchi to Montreal for Dejardins, LeClaire, and Dionne. That turned the Flyers into contenders. Unfortunately they couldn’t get a goalie to counter Brodeur. Which is why NJ had their number
Lindros actually did say he would play for the Habs, it was even mentioned in "Coaches Corner". It was a perfect bluff, he had good PR reps. Smooth!
But the media had already painted him as the number one villain, so good luck fighting against bad press once that narrative sells wholesale to the mob...
The fact that Quebec was sold to Colorado within two years of the draft shows he threw a hissy fit for nothing unless you think that Quebec stays there with the SAME owner if he played there.
Imagine a one-two punch of Forsberg and Lindros down the middle in Philly. Then probably a Sakic and Sundin in Colorado. It would have been awesome!
typical "I told you I would go to the prom with you... but I didn't know that that person was going to ask me to go"
They're was a TSN/RDS segment about him
please post it
@@walterdavies6434 write Lindros Revisité RDS and you'll see it
Honestly, if Lindros was not traded, I don't think the Quebec Nordiques/Colorado Avalanche would've won the Stanley Cup (or at least by 1996). Those pieces that they got from the Flyers either became key contributors in those Avalanche cup winning teams, or fliped for other pieces that became part of those cup winning teams. As for the Rangers - if that proposed trade came into fruition, would NY trade for Messier and go on to win the 1994 Stanley Cup? The Lindros saga is one huge spider web of what if's.
Messier was already a Ranger.
@@timetowakeup6302 Huh, guess I've thought he was traded to NY later.
Hard to imagine Messier and Lindros coexisting.
They did when Lindros got traded to the Rangers later on in his career...
Lindros also refused to play for the Greyhounds. Funny how Gretzky could play here but the Soo wasn't good enough for Lindros.
Bonnie and Carl Lindross made sure of that.
I think it's fair to say that the NY Rangers might not have won the Cup in 1994 if Lindros went to them instead of Philadelphia, but NOT because Vanbiesbrouck would have been in goal instead of Richter. Both goalies were elite. The only reason the Rangers let Vanbiesbrouck go in the expansion draft in 1993 was because he was 3 years older than Richter, not because he was clearly better. And, by the way, Vanbiesbrouck led the expansion Panthers to the Cup Finals in 1996.
the should played with the Nordiques
As much as this trade set the Avs up for success, the initial offer was even more insane!
No cups without Forsberg. He was they key that turned on the engine.
@@RedRisotto i know you put him with sakic, that line was unstoppable and the aves had guys like heduk, tangay, Lemieux,deadmarsh people forget how good the aves where, actually people forget how good the nhl was during those years, you had the aves, red wings, devils, and dallas with teams that where packed with talent
@@redred222 The numbers don't show it as it was an era of clutching, grabbing and head-hunting. The Detroit/Colorado games though... were always worth a watch.
@@RedRisotto
For sure, he was amazing! Too bad injuries shortened his career.
@@midimusicforever It sucked... There was no coasting - full game every night. Many disagree with me but I think lazy coaching also helped shorten his career - sending him up the middle of the ice with the puck because he could most of the time... was brutally punishing back then.
Just on a side note, lol at the irony of other fanbases saying that Bedard should've pulled a Lindros and refuse to sign with the Blackhawks, when that was an organisation Lindros wanted play for.
If not for a cheap shot artist, Lindros would be an all time great and this trade wouldn't get talked about nearly as much.
Why do I get chills every time you say Pierre Pagé?
I remember being really annoyed, even though I wasn’t a Nordiques fan, that after all those years of suffering, the first year that franchise moved south of the border, they won the Cup. Of course, had they not moved to Denver, the Roy trade doesn’t happen, so is it just me or is the game rigged against Canadian teams? Not necessarily in a deliberate sense, but it just seems like there’s always a disadvantage for teams north of the 49th.
Re Richter vs. Vanbiesbrouck: It's debatable. Beezer was arguably better with Florida in the mid-90s than Richter was with the Rangers during that time. They were pretty dead even. If Beezer is the Rangers goalie in '94, I don't see how that makes any real difference for them.
I agree with you, though, in terms of that entire trade being made. If the Rangers make that trade for Lindros, they don't have those young players that they used to acquire the likes of Noonan, Matteau, Larmer, etc., and would also be down Kovalev and Nemchinov.
Yes, Beezer had -96.
such a cool setup
Back then the media were saying he didn't like french Canadiens and he's a baby, like two decades later we learned that his wife speaks french and is from Montreal and he also didn't want to play for Marcel Aubut who was later involved in a scandal for sexual harassment with his female employees
@8:55 Your wrong. Vbk was a S.C. quality goaltender.
You wore the flyers jersey. You saying they won the trade
Beezer went to the finals in 96.
Getting Lindros would have wrecked the 94 cup team, but who knows if they would have won another year or multi years with Lindros.
My first ever nhl game was watching the post Lindros trade Nordiques destroy the Blues.
I was convinced that they must be the greatest team ever.
Forgot Chris Simon going in the trade too
Even though trading Amonte to CHI could look like a mistake, Matteau was part of that return. Lindros not going to NYR ended up working out for the better.
Get it right, it's MATTEAU! MATTEAU! MATTEAU!
According to lindros is was not the team or the city it was the ownership. As I type this you say it
It would have beem interesting to see Lindros in Quebec with Sakic and sundin. Supporting cast Kamensky/Nolan/kovalenko/Rucinsky/scott young. Actually looking on paper very stacked team!!.
All first picks gone when they won. Sundin, Nolan, Lindros.
Why did they trade Sundin?
@@staffan144 Nords felt they had enough fire power and missing an edge so they thought Clark would bring that. But it cost Sundin. I had just moved to Toronto from Quebec that year! Toronto kids couldn’t believe leafs got Sundin lol
Still think the Sharks should have had the 1st pick.
Trading Forsberg alone makes the trade bad for Phili