@@hersirivarr1236 deus only means god, in the middle age that term was used in the judeo-christian god, so you can say the deus jupiter, witchs means the god jupiter
@@goyonman9655 Watch this video ruclips.net/video/3unEvQ3uKrM/видео.html from his pinned comment on the what if the communist lost the civil war video.
"All right, but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, the fresh-water system, and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?"
@@And-lj5gbCorrection; Like most things "Roman" it was taken or "borrowed" from the Greeks. It is the Ancient Greeks who first coined the term "Barbarians" and it simply meant non-Greeks, usually invaders from the north. A little extra info; The root of the word Barbarian comes from the fact that when the civilized Ancient Greeks came into contact with them, their primitive language sounded awful to them. All they heard was "Var-var var var-var".
You can't be an authentic Roman unless you eat authentic Roman bread. That's why the Guild of Millers uses only the finest grains. TRVE ROMAN BREAD FOR TRVE ROMANS.
Fuck yeah! Brother there will never be anything like HBO’s Rome! It ended too soon. Fuck Tony and Cleo. That part of Roman history is all we ever get. Octavian’s long career needs to be depicted in pop culture. The HBO audience however prefers their ignorance...Cac-face cunnies!
I'm from Rome and i don't understand what you mean about ''Roman Bread'', here in the city we have tons of differents kinds of breads, not a typical ''Roman'' one. if you want some exemple: ''typical bread of Rome: ''Genzano, ciriola, rosetta, ciavattina, tartaruga, Lariano, casareccio, lievitazione naturale, integrale, al latte, all'olio, pizza bianca, focaccia'' and so on, i have named all the typical bread of Rome. ''Roman bread'' to me is a nonsense...
@BLUE DOG you mean like the Greeks copied Egypt?? hahaha take your racism elsewhere moron. every culture is influenced by their neighbors, there is no shame in it whatsoever.
@BLUE DOG everybody goes on and on with the greek stuff.. did greece ever conquer rome? did any state in greece ever take all roman lands by force? no.. but rome took all the greek lands by force? yes.. hmm.. I wonder why.. the romans also adopted good stuff from ALL the cultures they conquered its what made them roman, and as someone who comes from rome I respect greece and the greeks but when you talk shit about us we will talk shit back to you and we have alot more on you then you have on us.
Rome is, without a doubt, the most important empire for humans. Their bridges are still stanfing today and some of their buildings seem impossible to have been built in their time!
The Mass-Slavery System the most inhuman System, the war System killing Millions of free Nations and Tribes, very important for Humans. The Massmurder Benito Mussolini wanted to rebuild the Imperium Romanum 2.0 in the Eastern Mediteranean, the selfdecleared „Herrenmenschen“ and his Philosophy of the Fratelli Fascisti di Italia, copied by Hitler.
Mostly Celtic and Germanic with a little Romantic. More Celtic in the northwest, more Germanic in the north and east, and more Romantic in the south. Overall The French are still a distinct ethnic group though.
Celtic, italic and germanic are cultural terms that refered to languages. Those groups were each one genetically diverse to begin with. Especially the celts which had conquested most of the western part of Europe. The Gauls were mostly call celtic for their cultural heritage, not for their genetics (at that time DNA tests did not exist). Celts were not actually autochtonous from what is now France, but from central Europe Roman texts of the conquest of Gaul are clear about the fact that what they called « Gaul » was made of multiple ethnic groups, some of celtic language and other not (the whole south wast of France had never been celtic). The inhabitnants of « Gaul » were described as having a lot of phenotypical variations among the different groups from north to south. Before the celts culture arrived the south of « gaul » was actually populated by ligurians, a mediterranean people and various vasconic (basque-like) peoples, with greek settlements along the coast. In the rest of France, The celts arrived just 500 years before the romans did, and before them the place was already largely settled by neolithic peuple, maybe related to the vasconic people. These are probably more our ancestor than the celts from central Europe wich more likely were a ruling minority that assimilated to local people like the romans will do it after them. Following modern DNA tests, results from Ancesrty DNA had done the following results, based on the genetic categories called « iberian », « southern euro » (meaning from central med), «western euro » (what some DNA companies call wrongly « french and german », « british and irish » (Those categories do not refer actually to being originaing from these places but to share common DNA in place like north western france) Here the statistical resuslts for France, Spain and Germany postimg.cc/gallery/n0ciqc6k/ It gives for France the main « genetic group » : - « iberian » for 27% (coming from the pre-celtic peoples like vascons) - « southern euro » for 20% (coming mostly from the autochtonous people from the mediterranean area, before the celts arrive: ligurians but also the old greek settlements along the mediterranean coast) - « western euro » for 20% (coming mostly central european peoples, the original antic celts from southern germany) - « british » for 15 % (probably coming from the old populations that spanned on the both sides of the channel, in the north-western parts of France and British isles, before these people had been celtized and gave birth to welsh, cornish, etc. The DNA of antic « germanic » origins is limited to 1%, it had been brought by viking when they settled to normandy. Franks themselves had probably a little bit of these DNA, but actually most franks were, like most of central and southern germany, they were mostly germanized people that had actually more celtic origins. Actually the most celtic people, genetically speaking are soithern germans, austrians and swiss people. Irish or scottish people were celtic by language but the DNA test show that they were not genetically descendants of the original celtic people of central europe.
Interesting that Greeks aren't considered real Romans by many in the west. In some parts of Turkey Greeks are still called Romans (Rumlar) to this day and Greek speaking people refereed to themselves as Romans for over 1,700 years. All upper class Romans were fluent in Greek going back centuries before Christ and Greek was the mother tongue of many Italians and people living in Rome. This is similar to modern day Canada which is made up of English and French speakers. The phrase 'Byzantine Empire' was created in the 19th century, before this it was just called the Roman Empire so I think it makes sense to also include the Greeks as the descendents of Rome.
@@devoncartwright89 Yes you are correct ancient Greeks played a huge role in creating Roman culture but Rome also played a huge role in creating modern Greeks. Modern Greek culture mostly comes from the Christian Roman Empire which was founded by Emperor Constantine after he moved Rome's capital city to Constantinople.
savvageorge while initially Christianity was encouraged by Roman emperors, the Eastern Orthodox Church is extremely different from the Roman Catholic Church. I would hardly say outside of religion that there is much Greek culture that comes from Rome seeing as they still utilise their own alphabet, language (not Latin based), music, food, and customs. I would say they have more in common with Turks than than they do with Romans. Also the Seljuk Turks and Ottoman Turks called themselves Rûm (Roman) once they conquered Anatolia from the Byzantines. So by your logic would you say the Turks are also Roman?
Philip Arvanitidis so what I’m trying to understand from your broken English is you are talking about citizenship, as in the Greeks during the empire has Roman citizenship. Yes that is correct, but so did North Africans and people from the Middle East, so you guys should be including them as well.
@@NoName-ze4qn Some are mixed with slavs, germans, celts and other groups, there is no pure race we are all the result of nations, tribes, empires that came and gone.
I love videos on the more obscure, less well known people groups like this! I have three video suggestions: 1) The Thracians - ancient extent and possible modern descendants 2) Szekely people of Romania 3) History of the Crimean peninsula - so many people have passed through it or called it home
He forgot to mention, without the Romans or the Latins, England wouldn't have become the empire it was and it wouldn't be what it is now. What it used to be called the Provincia Britannia under the Roman or Latin rule for 400 years.
Even though the Romans left Britain, it's worth nothing the cultural impact they had on the native Welsh. Intermixture between the Welsh and the Romans can be seen in Welsh folklore, such as in the story of Magnus Maximus/Macsen Wledig. The most obvious example of Roman influence today is in the Welsh language, with many words such as pont, ffenest, eglwys, ceffyl, llyfr etc being of Latin origin. To prove my point the same words in French are pont, fenêtre, église, cheval and livre.
Well, many of the words you quoted apparently entered welsh language through direct medieval french (norman or angevine) influence and not directly from latin : "egwlys" seems more similar to french "église" than to latin "ecclesia", "llyfr" seems more similar to "livre" than to latin "libra". And "cheval" is one of the few french words who have an actual gaulish etymology: "caballos" as opposed to regular latin "equus", though this word passed from gaulish to the variant of vulgar latin spoken in Gaul, then into old french.
@@elbentos7803 I don't know about that, Brittonic langauges such as Welsh, Breton and Cornish grew separate from other celtic langauges as a result of the roman 'occupation' of Britain (Bretons are Britons that fled to gallo-roman controlled Soissons kingdom during the anglo-saxon invasions of Britain). for example all Brittonic lanauges have latin based words for fish, approximately 800 latin based words were in common Brittonic. so they definately were Latin influenced before france had a chance to influence them, 300 years of latin rule will do that
the romans never fully romanized italy as a romanian i find it very odd because as a romanian i can talk to any other romanian from diferent regions and understand them 100% same with aromanians and even standart italian and spanish yet italy is full of dialects from one village to another!!!!
Marcel Costache for us these are not dialects but languages. I always correct people who speak of Lombardic as a dialect because it is not. Dialects for example are Cremonese, Milanese etc, which are local forks of our West Lombardic language.
@@leonardodavid2842 No, actually romanian is the closest to Latin. Vokabular is the makeup, so the pool of words from Hungarian and Turkic in romanian is not mayor factor to consider. The grammar is the key and romanian is hands down the closest to latin, the very fact that romanian still has cases sets them apart from the rest of romance languages. In other hand isolated languages change less, romanians been insolated by Hungarians and Turks would tend to preserve their language and have weaker dialectal variations because their langauge neighbors are totally different.
Thats got little to do with the Romans, but from the Normans (Romans had an indirect influence on the language). And that 65% is mostly the more sophisticated words in the English dictionary, and are used in science, law, government, academia etc. This is due to the Norman aristocracy influence as they controlled these areas of life in England. Yet the basic language used in everyday life is very Germanic. Such as "where is that" is "Wo ist das" in German or "I have" is "Ich habe" in German. The English dictionary is pumped with French/Latin words that are rarely ever used in everyday conversation, compared to the Germanic words which are used more often. So the 65% is a tad misleading, as those words are used much less often in conversations.
Note: Galicia think itself Celtic not because the small Brythonic migration but pre Roman times Gallaecia. In fact, most of Galicians totally ignore that Dark Ages migration towards their country.
Celts(the Gallaecian tribe) were the indigenous, pre-Roman ethnic group of Galicia. Obviously the modern Galicians descend mostly from the native Celts rather than some later Welsh/breton migrations. To be frank, that was a very stupid thing for masaman to say.
@@ledWenceslas880 false, while romanization seems to have been slower in certain parts of culture, but Galicians were very pro-roman (post 19BC), with more than 1/3 of Iberian recruits in roman armies coming from Galician volunteers. the main lanuage according to written and archeological evidence was vulgar Latin, which itself developed into Galician-Portuguese BEFORE Visigothic take over. now Bretoña (the northern parts of the modern provinces of A Coruña and Lugo) was founded by Britons and its culture is actually distinct from the rest of Galicia (although the difference has irroded over the years) with Britons being the 3rd largest ethnic group in Galicia (2nd being Suebi germans, 1st being local Ibero-romans [as the romans that settled the region became too mixed with the locals to be separated])
They would not likely conquer the Mediterranean as they preferred to have small trading posts instead of large stretches of land. They, along with the Greeks, would however have a significant impact on the Mediterranean culture
Carthaginian rule was more indirect, they didn't assimilate people like the Romans did and preferred small outposts to vast tracts of land. Carthage would rather trade than conquer.
@@strictlyunreal It always blows my mind to think that Julius Caesar was more recent to us today than the founding of Rome was to the last Roman Emperor
Galicians don't claim Celtic descent from British ancestry, rather it is the British/Irish who would partially descend (at least culturally) from Galicians/Portuguese according to some interpretations of mythology (Breogan and the sons of Mile Espaine) and archeology (Celtic from the West).
@@Alexanderscott90 Some evidence points to the Tartessians possibly being a Celtic culture or at least being Celtic influenced. It's still up in the air, though. Same with the idea that Celts developed as a civilization in Spain/Potugal and then spread along the coast and inland through rivers. This definitely breaks with tradition, so it's gonna take a while for it to be accepted if it ever does really. But we do know that the Tartessians, whatever they were, were pretty famous and admired in the ancient world (at least if they are the same as the fabled Tarshish).
xoanwahn - Tarshish is not a fable. It was a real place and with real people. There are simply different names. Tarshish is a very ancient one. The native people there were related to the ancient Greeks such as the ionians etc.
@@JM-uw8rg I never meant to imply Tarshish wasn't real, I just meant that it was fabled in the sense that its wealth and prestige were and are legendary, principally because of its mineral deposits.
It was the longest lasting though. I don't think there's an empire that lasted longer than theirs if you consider the Bizantins (which you should, since they were still Romans, and Bizantine was a stupid term created by a historian in the XIX cent).
Romans still exist through their descendants. Latin Europeans and Latin Americans of Spanish, Italian, and Portuguese descent.I’m one of them. My family still retains some Roman traditions. We still and always will exist.
A. Siddharta I can tell you don’t know about modern Latins because when I, one of Spanish descent, meet a Latin American, Portuguese, Italian, French, or Romanian person, we both recognize that we act very similar because we have the same Latin roots.
The Basque are only culturally and linguistically distinct from their neighbors. Genetically they are practically the same as their neighbors. Studies have shown this to be true.
That's not really true, there are plenty of pre-Indoeuropean genes that are unique of the Basque people (and a few random spots in southern Europe, if I remember right)
@@ludovicoliviello7753 their distinction comes from resisting intermixing with the steppe migration and much later the Muslims. But it's not much. blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/02/the-basques-may-not-be-who-we-think-they-are/#.XTN56lNlAwB
@@ludovicoliviello7753 hi, having into account that chimpaces and humans share 90 % DNA, and that all humana sharp 99,9 % DNA, I dont think Basques or any other group on Earth have 'many different genes' from the rest of mankind. pure blood doesn't exist. regards
You should do a video on the old Anatolians ( Hittites, Lydians, etc ) basically the civilizations descended from the first indo-europeans to settle in Anatolia
Why do the sicilianu/calabrese/Napolitano dialects always get overlooked? They are highly divergent from standard Italian and and have politically and culturally distinct from the rest of Italy for most of their existence up until the late 19th C
@@CyrilleParis I belive there is some data about the number of romans that migrated to the new provinces of the empire but i dont know more. But yeah it would be cool to know more.
hey @Masaman can you do one on Sicily to clear up all the popular misconceptions people have? it has a very unique and layered history that many people are ignorant about.
Very interesting, in terms of future videos I would be very interested in knowing more about the demographics of the Mali empire and the reminants of each population group today.
Thre Romans used the germanic tribes like mercenarys and allieds:francs,gothics,and the french-normans at the medieval age(the varengs were byzantine mercenarys too,thats why the Pope is so glad over Europe and US),and the Opus Dei&jesuits.
I don't think the point of this video is chronology, it's more just an out of order coverage of extinct roman descendants and the factors that led to it and their end. Don't really see why this is an issue for you, just being petty for some reason.
Brighton Whytock Is it true that Finland is the rightful inheritor of the title of Caesar of Rome? There is a chart out there that makes the case for it, but it seems a bit fishy.
@@zibongo6720 egypt lasted more, i would argue that while romans were not the largest, longer lasting, or, maybe, the strongest of all the empires in history, they were by far the most influencial.
@@jotascript03 Based Brazuca .Saludos del otro lado del Río de la Plata . Hey , I am Blonde and very Pale but I can still be Latin .All my ancestors were Mediterranean .Germanics do not own my Genetics .
Salve , Frater .Dios permita , por lo menos , Unión Ibérica . God willing , we can eliminate more Angloid and Germanic influences and truly recognize our identity and heritage .Hope that Brazil can defend the richness of its heritage .Hell , re-establish the Emperor , that might help with it .
To answer your question, miscegenation was not popular in the Philippines. Mainly due to ethnic, cultural and religious reasons in the past. But since the 1970s to the present, miscegenation is now acceptable socially.
Great video, as always, just a little correction, the last Dalmatian native speaker died in the island of Krk/Veglia in 1898 due to an Austrian bomb, his name was Tuone Udaina (Antonio Udina in Italian). Before dying, he helped the Italian linguist Matteo Bartoli to make a dictionary about Dalmatian, today most of what we know about Dalmatian was thanks to Bartoli and Udina and the Vegliot dialect of Dalmatian is considered the most well known among the Dalmatian dialects, including Ragusean.
Well the anti-italian policy of Austro-hungarian empire hit hard italian minority in Dalmatia (that in the begging of 19th century was 20% to 30% of the population). Then with Jugoslavia almost all of remaining italians left, and Tito finished the job expelling or killing who remained, in Istria too). Istrian and Dalmatian dialect are now extinct languages and the small minority in Istria isn't really italian but more croatians who speak italian
@@andreamarino6010 Well, most of what you said is true, except the part about Istrian, in Istria there are still Latin languages besides Italian. Istriot, a Romance language closely related to Dalmatian spoken in the western part of Istria. Istro-Romanian, closely related to Romanian, spoken in the eastern side of Istria. Veneto da Mar (in particular the one spoken by the Istrians), spoken by Italians, descendants of Venetian colonists who settled there centuries ago. Unfortunately, they are all very endangered.
@@andreamarino6010 thats not truth, italian minority was never up to 20%-30% of population in dalmatia. in istria in towns maybe, but outside of coastal towns there was 100% slavic population. both in istria and dalmatia. most of italian families were italinised locals anyway. those who wanted to be or were part of higher society.
@@tiami3886 In the beggining of 1800's they were. Also, italian-dalmatian were there from roman colonisation (like the video said too), there is a reason why all the cities in Istria and Dalmatia coast had italian names (Sebenico, Segna, Zara, Lissa, Ragusa, Cattaro, Spalato and many others). In istria the situation was 50% italians 50% slavs
Loved the video, tho I think you missed a great opportunity by not saying anything about the Pannonian Latins, especially considering all the recent discoveries about them in the ancient tombs around Lake Balaton
@@niallmaw2315 he has 0 on levantine Arabs. Levantine Arabs are one of the most ethnically diverse groups. With Italian, Greek, assaryian, Bedouin, sub Saharan, turkish, jewish, druze, kurds etc
Technically Levantine people are for the most part not Arabs; neither ethnically nor culturally as we are so often mistaken to be. Levantine people mainly descend from the Arameans (west-Syriacs), Canaanites/Phoenicians, Hittites, and to a lesser extend from Assyrians (east-Syriacs), Babylonians, Greeks and Romans, with also some genetic sprinkles from Arabs, Anatolians, Turks, Iranian Peoples, and Mongols.
@@muhannadbursheh6109 To be fair, all Semitic people originally stemmed from Arabia, so even Phoenicians, Assyrians, and Arameans could all be considered Arabic to an extent. That definitely holds true genetically.
@@Userius1 Actually the theory that all Semitic people originated from Arabia has been abandoned a while ago, and now most scholars believe Semitic people originated in the Syrian desert and spread from there. Putting it in a very generalised manner, during the initial Semitic migrations there were 3 main groups; 1. the Akkadians, who settled in Mesopotamia (mixing with the Sumerians) and eventually became the Assyrians and Babylonians; 2. The West Semitic Group (Amorites, Canaanites, Arameans) who mainly settled in the Levant; 3. The Arabs who mainly settled in the Arabian Peninsula and parts of the Syrian Desert... Although a lot of time has passed, and a lot of mixing and melting has happened, the cultural and genealogical traits of each of these three regions still strongly adhere to that initial setup if I may say. Actually, contrary to what you stated, the genetic studies I've looked at clearly show the genetic diversion of the modern people of the Levant and Mesopotamia from those of the Arabian Peninsula. Even on a basic superficial level, you can easily tell the people of the region apart just from the facial features and general physique. Cheers
@@muhannadbursheh6109 I'm not that in the know on Middle-Eastern autosomal genetics. Is the divergence in genetics due to mixing from outside source, like the Sumerians, as you said? Otherwise I would think that early Akkadian would be the same as early Bedouin, akin to how 5th century AD Serb would be equivalent to a modern Pole rather than the more mixed Balkan version today.
I would love to see a video about the remnants of the Greco-Bactrian empire. I realize the geographic scope may be somewhat limited, although I imagine the mountain valleys make for many micro-cultural opportunities. However, perhaps another dimension could be the prominence of Greco-Bactrians through the carousel of the different empires in Afghanistan through the centuries. I do love the Greco-Bactrian Empire; I think I’d choose to live there and then over any other pre-modern culture.
@@DJTreviCSRecordings they are not exactly the same as other Iberians they are an iron age population relic but underwent the Same transformation during the bronze age as other euros
Any chance of going a bit further back? Hittites, Luwians, Sumerians, Babylonians et alia? Were the Anatolians replacing a resident population around three thousand years ago, or were they the neolithic aborigine?
Look, I'm not saying I had bad history teachers... In fact, they were good. All I'm saying is that you make them look like they're 5th graders teaching history hahaha. Mason, I love your videos! Your channel has quickly become one of my top 5 favorites. I'm Italian-Brazilian btw, super proud of my Italic roots.
I love watching these videos you do a great job I have a hard time understand sometimes it's hard to understanding the graphs. Although i do really enjoy the videos. My ancestry is Spanish.
I wanna learn about historical Swedish speaking lands but that would go pretty quick so how about “Dead Scandinavians” . By that I’m thinking about the Norse settlers in Greenland, the swedes in the Estonia. Fun fact though there exists a small village in Ukraine called “Gammelsvenskbyn” I believe, it roughly translated to “The Old Swedish Village”. Anyhow it got settled by Swedish soldiers during the great northern war and people are still speaking Swedish there however they’re a minority.
@@elbentos7803 What I mean is, that in an alternate timeline, a Romance language evolves in Britain (starting in Roman times) from among the Celtic, pre-Anglo Saxon population with a Romance grammatical and lexical base in the same manner as in Gaul, Iberia, etc. Whereas English has a Germanic base despite much Romance vocabulary.
@@yodorob Indeed, i once read a try at imagining what could have been a "britono-romance" modern language : the result wasn't very convincing but interesting nonetheless. To my mind, this hypothetical language could very well have sounded like french, an evolution of west-germanic influenced vulgar latin upon a "p" celtic substrate. I think "gallo" dialect of french (eastern Brittany) may be a good exemple of what this tongue could have been like.
Hey man, great videos and excellent presentation, enjoying 100%. Do you have any thoughts on the Balkan area ( especially Dalmatia/Ilyria ) in the 5 AD - 10 AD period?
@@marcelcostache2504 True. You can still find traditional horse breading and customs regarding horses in dalmatian villages. But the period between 5th and 8th AD was supposedly pretty turbulent regarding the movement of tribes and people. I'm curious how is it so, that that period has such a little sources and info.
No, the Portuguese is very closer to Galician. Portugal was born after have been conquered the south beyond the river "Miño" by people from Galicia. And there were celts in Galicia a long time before some of them arrived from French Britania... Actually all the northwest of Spain and big zones of Centre Spain were areas that were populated by Celts
Fantastic video! Have you ever done a video on Polynesians? It’s quite a mystery where they came from and how they populated almost every island 🌴 in the Pacific Ocean 🌊
@The Nova renaissance yeah.. that's the main hypothesis, but there's a lot of evidence of amero-Indian influence.. especially in Eastern Polynesia.. By the way, he did do a video on Polynesia (aka Oceania)..
...another awesome history doc. ...yours are the best for sure ...your time and efforts are greatly appreciated and in my opinion necessary so, thank you - great job. ...could you please expand on the pre roman, ancient celts of the alps region as you mentioned and please could you do a piece on the vikings migration to italy and more specifically sicily... i was born in the mountains of north east sicily close to the coastline between st. agatha and cefelu. literally less the 50 feet above the doorway to the grotto i lived in was a nordic/norman castle. ... and immediately surrounding compagnia militari was nicosia, castel di lucio and sperlinga all of which contained nordic/norman castle structures the largest of which in sperlinga... i remember being told as a child that that entire area was one huge castle town... i don't know, i guess it's possible - maybe ...further, it was just one of a string of castle towns on the side of sicily, from the greater north east of the island to the south east of the island with the western edge as far west as gela (or terra nova) on the southern coastline of the island... once again great job sir - and thank you.
@@dexter99999 man i know latin and i'm speak sicilian too. I don't saying that Sicilian it's more close to Latin than Sardian, I'm saying that are equally near to Latin. Search some sentences in this 3 languages and you'll see that I'm not saying anything wrong.
English speakers often overlook the world-wide influence of Roman Law. In Western Europe its importance was obscured by the steamroller effect of the Napoleonic Code, but it remains live in a lot of small nations, among them Scotland, Quebec, Louisiana, South Africa and Sri Lanka. The Latin language remains important in religion (the Roman Catholic Church) and science, especially medicine.
Says Zeus instead of Jupiter in the context of Rome
Me: *You're gonna pay for that*
What about Deus?
@@hersirivarr1236 deus only means god, in the middle age that term was used in the judeo-christian god, so you can say the deus jupiter, witchs means the god jupiter
@@neyougogo9923 Cheers friend.
By Jove!
By Mithras ?
All roads lead to Rome....country roooads take me Rome
Been to Rome ? Spain ? France , cubichi ? Jodieron a Cuba. Greets from NYC.
Daaaamn
Averyyyyy
Lmfao
...Soooouthern Euroooope,
Latin mommaaaa,
Take me roooome, take me rooooome
"Withouth the romans.."
Alternative history hub: Allow me to introduce myself.
Yeah
I hate he hasn't finished that series
@@goyonman9655
Watch this video
ruclips.net/video/3unEvQ3uKrM/видео.html
from his pinned comment on the what if the communist lost the civil war video.
*Allow me to
@@84updown You should quote the error before the correction. What did he write, "aloud"?
@daniel My most hated meme is "hold my beer," which is lowbrow in the extreme, and whose fans would write, "Alternative history hub: Hold my beer."
"All right, but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, the fresh-water system, and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?"
Lord Protector what is " your people "?
@Zedfinite those were the Moors 😉
@Savage
Haha!
Join the queue my friend
First time?
Civilization is gay
@Lord Protector Rome was a bastion of civilization, and improved the lives of those they conquered.
Heyyyy said the Romans, eating the entire Mediterranean for breakfast
Kim Jong-un The Romans gobbled up the Mediterranean slower than your grandfather tried to eat Seoul back in 1950.
What's a barbarian?
"Non-Romans"- said the Romans being invaded by non-Romans.
I can't believe only one other person in this feed seems to have gotten the joke.
hahahahaha history of the world(I guess)
@@And-lj5gbCorrection; Like most things "Roman" it was taken or "borrowed" from the Greeks. It is the Ancient Greeks who first coined the term "Barbarians" and it simply meant non-Greeks, usually invaders from the north. A little extra info; The root of the word Barbarian comes from the fact that when the civilized Ancient Greeks came into contact with them, their primitive language sounded awful to them. All they heard was "Var-var var var-var".
You can't be an authentic Roman unless you eat authentic Roman bread.
That's why the Guild of Millers uses only the finest grains.
TRVE ROMAN BREAD FOR TRVE ROMANS.
Fuck yeah! Brother there will never be anything like HBO’s Rome! It ended too soon. Fuck Tony and Cleo. That part of Roman history is all we ever get. Octavian’s long career needs to be depicted in pop culture. The HBO audience however prefers their ignorance...Cac-face cunnies!
I'm from Rome and i don't understand what you mean about ''Roman Bread'', here in the city we have tons of differents kinds of breads, not a typical ''Roman'' one. if you want some exemple: ''typical bread of Rome: ''Genzano, ciriola, rosetta, ciavattina, tartaruga, Lariano, casareccio, lievitazione naturale, integrale, al latte, all'olio, pizza bianca, focaccia'' and so on, i have named all the typical bread of Rome. ''Roman bread'' to me is a nonsense...
Braschi Giovanni Angelo
I think he’s referring to a kind of bread sold in the United States
It’s Roman in name only
@@braschigiovanniangelo5559 You guys need to start watching HBO's Rome.
@@braschigiovanniangelo5559 It's a quote from the HBO series "Rome" set in _ancient_ Rome.
Zeus was the Greek name, you mean by JUPITER. 😉
wait a sec...BY THE POPE!!!
@BLUE DOG you mean like the Greeks copied Egypt?? hahaha take your racism elsewhere moron. every culture is influenced by their neighbors, there is no shame in it whatsoever.
@@AlbertManiscalco and egypt by who
DIYS PATER!
@BLUE DOG everybody goes on and on with the greek stuff.. did greece ever conquer rome? did any state in greece ever take all roman lands by force? no.. but rome took all the greek lands by force? yes.. hmm.. I wonder why.. the romans also adopted good stuff from ALL the cultures they conquered its what made them roman, and as someone who comes from rome I respect greece and the greeks but when you talk shit about us we will talk shit back to you and we have alot more on you then you have on us.
Rome is, without a doubt, the most important empire for humans. Their bridges are still stanfing today and some of their buildings seem impossible to have been built in their time!
Along with the Incas! The amount they accomplished in 100 years is amazing
@@graciegilchriest softly: don't
India and China has its own spears of Influence. Like Greater India and and the Sinospear
@@covenawhite4855 Rome might have had "spears of influence," but India and China have "spheres."
The Mass-Slavery System the most inhuman System, the war System killing Millions of free Nations and Tribes, very important for Humans. The Massmurder Benito Mussolini wanted to rebuild the Imperium Romanum 2.0 in the Eastern Mediteranean, the selfdecleared „Herrenmenschen“ and his Philosophy of the Fratelli Fascisti di Italia, copied by Hitler.
How germanic, celtic and italic is the genetics of French people?
They have alot of Spanish/north-African blood from the Spanish civil war refugees
Mostly Celtic and Germanic with a little Romantic. More Celtic in the northwest, more Germanic in the north and east, and more Romantic in the south. Overall The French are still a distinct ethnic group though.
Celtic, italic and germanic are cultural terms that refered to languages. Those groups were each one genetically diverse to begin with. Especially the celts which had conquested most of the western part of Europe. The Gauls were mostly call celtic for their cultural heritage, not for their genetics (at that time DNA tests did not exist). Celts were not actually autochtonous from what is now France, but from central Europe
Roman texts of the conquest of Gaul are clear about the fact that what they called « Gaul » was made of multiple ethnic groups, some of celtic language and other not (the whole south wast of France had never been celtic). The inhabitnants of « Gaul » were described as having a lot of phenotypical variations among the different groups from north to south. Before the celts culture arrived the south of « gaul » was actually populated by ligurians, a mediterranean people and various vasconic (basque-like) peoples, with greek settlements along the coast.
In the rest of France, The celts arrived just 500 years before the romans did, and before them the place was already largely settled by neolithic peuple, maybe related to the vasconic people. These are probably more our ancestor than the celts from central Europe wich more likely were a ruling minority that assimilated to local people like the romans will do it after them.
Following modern DNA tests, results from Ancesrty DNA had done the following results, based on the genetic categories called « iberian », « southern euro » (meaning from central med), «western euro » (what some DNA companies call wrongly « french and german », « british and irish » (Those categories do not refer actually to being originaing from these places but to share common DNA in place like north western france)
Here the statistical resuslts for France, Spain and Germany
postimg.cc/gallery/n0ciqc6k/
It gives for France the main « genetic group » :
- « iberian » for 27% (coming from the pre-celtic peoples like vascons)
- « southern euro » for 20% (coming mostly from the autochtonous people from the mediterranean area, before the celts arrive: ligurians but also the old greek settlements along the mediterranean coast)
- « western euro » for 20% (coming mostly central european peoples, the original antic celts from southern germany)
- « british » for 15 % (probably coming from the old populations that spanned on the both sides of the channel, in the north-western parts of France and British isles, before these people had been celtized and gave birth to welsh, cornish, etc.
The DNA of antic « germanic » origins is limited to 1%, it had been brought by viking when they settled to normandy. Franks themselves had probably a little bit of these DNA, but actually most franks were, like most of central and southern germany, they were mostly germanized people that had actually more celtic origins. Actually the most celtic people, genetically speaking are soithern germans, austrians and swiss people. Irish or scottish people were celtic by language but the DNA test show that they were not genetically descendants of the original celtic people of central europe.
@@fablb9006 Sure, but there were obvious racial similarities in these cultural groups.
If you are talking about today, they have strong African and Middle Eastern genes
Interesting that Greeks aren't considered real Romans by many in the west. In some parts of Turkey Greeks are still called Romans (Rumlar) to this day and Greek speaking people refereed to themselves as Romans for over 1,700 years. All upper class Romans were fluent in Greek going back centuries before Christ and Greek was the mother tongue of many Italians and people living in Rome. This is similar to modern day Canada which is made up of English and French speakers. The phrase 'Byzantine Empire' was created in the 19th century, before this it was just called the Roman Empire so I think it makes sense to also include the Greeks as the descendents of Rome.
savvageorge despite the name though, historically they’d be the Roman ancestors as Greek culture established Roman culture.
@@devoncartwright89 Yes you are correct ancient Greeks played a huge role in creating Roman culture but Rome also played a huge role in creating modern Greeks. Modern Greek culture mostly comes from the Christian Roman Empire which was founded by Emperor Constantine after he moved Rome's capital city to Constantinople.
savvageorge while initially Christianity was encouraged by Roman emperors, the Eastern Orthodox Church is extremely different from the Roman Catholic Church.
I would hardly say outside of religion that there is much Greek culture that comes from Rome seeing as they still utilise their own alphabet, language (not Latin based), music, food, and customs. I would say they have more in common with Turks than than they do with Romans.
Also the Seljuk Turks and Ottoman Turks called themselves Rûm (Roman) once they conquered Anatolia from the Byzantines. So by your logic would you say the Turks are also Roman?
@@savvageorge from nicomedia not rome
Philip Arvanitidis so what I’m trying to understand from your broken English is you are talking about citizenship, as in the Greeks during the empire has Roman citizenship. Yes that is correct, but so did North Africans and people from the Middle East, so you guys should be including them as well.
Umbrians and the extinct Italic peoples be like “(…)”
@Carlo Canti did Byzantium or later Longobards had any influence on this people?
@Carlo Canti thank you for the info.
The people are still alive and well, but their languages are dead and forgotten...
@@NoName-ze4qn Some are mixed with slavs, germans, celts and other groups, there is no pure race we are all the result of nations, tribes, empires that came and gone.
@MISERICORDI A yet if you ask any person from friuli they will tell you there italian to the bone lol
I love videos on the more obscure, less well known people groups like this! I have three video suggestions:
1) The Thracians - ancient extent and possible modern descendants
2) Szekely people of Romania
3) History of the Crimean peninsula - so many people have passed through it or called it home
@Carpe Diem I agree. Scythians, Greeks, Goths, Tatars, Russians, etc. Didn't realize what a fascinating place it is till recently.
they still exist, i saw them sitting on their generic European apartment veranda, drinking beer and complaining about Italian politic
Otto Shu cocaine
He forgot to mention, without the Romans or the Latins, England wouldn't have become the empire it was and it wouldn't be what it is now. What it used to be called the Provincia Britannia under the Roman or Latin rule for 400 years.
I think it was because of the french (normands) and the protestantism.
Is it just me or is Masaman going crazy with new uploads lately?
Yes and a little more sloppy too. But I still love his channel. It's the geography nerd in me.
Why?
No hes awesome
Even though the Romans left Britain, it's worth nothing the cultural impact they had on the native Welsh. Intermixture between the Welsh and the Romans can be seen in Welsh folklore, such as in the story of Magnus Maximus/Macsen Wledig. The most obvious example of Roman influence today is in the Welsh language, with many words such as pont, ffenest, eglwys, ceffyl, llyfr etc being of Latin origin. To prove my point the same words in French are pont, fenêtre, église, cheval and livre.
Well, many of the words you quoted apparently entered welsh language through direct medieval french (norman or angevine) influence and not directly from latin : "egwlys" seems more similar to french "église" than to latin "ecclesia", "llyfr" seems more similar to "livre" than to latin "libra".
And "cheval" is one of the few french words who have an actual gaulish etymology: "caballos" as opposed to regular latin "equus", though this word passed from gaulish to the variant of vulgar latin spoken in Gaul, then into old french.
Magnus Maximus himself was a Romanized Celt from the Roman province of Gallaecia in modern day Spain.
@@elbentos7803 I don't know about that, Brittonic langauges such as Welsh, Breton and Cornish grew separate from other celtic langauges as a result of the roman 'occupation' of Britain (Bretons are Britons that fled to gallo-roman controlled Soissons kingdom during the anglo-saxon invasions of Britain). for example all Brittonic lanauges have latin based words for fish, approximately 800 latin based words were in common Brittonic.
so they definately were Latin influenced before france had a chance to influence them, 300 years of latin rule will do that
@@matthiuskoenig3378 Why is there a quote around occupation? Were they not conquerored and occupied?
Video: Dead Romans
Julius Caesar: Are you talking about me?
:-0
39th stab wound here!
As Italian I would argue we still are a collective of minor warring tribes.
the romans never fully romanized italy as a romanian i find it very odd because as a romanian i can talk to any other romanian from diferent regions and understand them 100% same with aromanians and even standart italian and spanish yet italy is full of dialects from one village to another!!!!
Beh son gusti.
@Mustafa Alam ?
Marcel Costache for us these are not dialects but languages. I always correct people who speak of Lombardic as a dialect because it is not. Dialects for example are Cremonese, Milanese etc, which are local forks of our West Lombardic language.
@@leonardodavid2842 No, actually romanian is the closest to Latin. Vokabular is the makeup, so the pool of words from Hungarian and Turkic in romanian is not mayor factor to consider. The grammar is the key and romanian is hands down the closest to latin, the very fact that romanian still has cases sets them apart from the rest of romance languages.
In other hand isolated languages change less, romanians been insolated by Hungarians and Turks would tend to preserve their language and have weaker dialectal variations because their langauge neighbors are totally different.
65% of English vocabulary is of Latin or old French (with is neo latin)
Thats got little to do with the Romans, but from the Normans (Romans had an indirect influence on the language). And that 65% is mostly the more sophisticated words in the English dictionary, and are used in science, law, government, academia etc. This is due to the Norman aristocracy influence as they controlled these areas of life in England.
Yet the basic language used in everyday life is very Germanic. Such as "where is that" is "Wo ist das" in German or "I have" is "Ich habe" in German. The English dictionary is pumped with French/Latin words that are rarely ever used in everyday conversation, compared to the Germanic words which are used more often. So the 65% is a tad misleading, as those words are used much less often in conversations.
Normans were chease eating vikings who loved French life, 200 years later, invaded England, and most of the word you wrote me were latin based.
French is mother of english language
True, but the 100 most used words in English are all of Germanic origin.
North east england is anglo saxon( geordie)
Note: Galicia think itself Celtic not because the small Brythonic migration but pre Roman times Gallaecia. In fact, most of Galicians totally ignore that Dark Ages migration towards their country.
Yeah, I thought he was talking about the pre roman Celto-Iberians. I had no idea about later migrations. Interesting!
Celts(the Gallaecian tribe) were the indigenous, pre-Roman ethnic group of Galicia. Obviously the modern Galicians descend mostly from the native Celts rather than some later Welsh/breton migrations. To be frank, that was a very stupid thing for masaman to say.
@@ledWenceslas880 false, while romanization seems to have been slower in certain parts of culture, but Galicians were very pro-roman (post 19BC), with more than 1/3 of Iberian recruits in roman armies coming from Galician volunteers. the main lanuage according to written and archeological evidence was vulgar Latin, which itself developed into Galician-Portuguese BEFORE Visigothic take over.
now Bretoña (the northern parts of the modern provinces of A Coruña and Lugo) was founded by Britons and its culture is actually distinct from the rest of Galicia (although the difference has irroded over the years) with Britons being the 3rd largest ethnic group in Galicia (2nd being Suebi germans, 1st being local Ibero-romans [as the romans that settled the region became too mixed with the locals to be separated])
Topic: what happend to the cossacks
If the Romans hadn't become the dominant power then the Carthaginians certainly would've.
They would not likely conquer the Mediterranean as they preferred to have small trading posts instead of large stretches of land. They, along with the Greeks, would however have a significant impact on the Mediterranean culture
:D
"to negate something that existed for something that didn't, is foolishness"
Carthaginian rule was more indirect, they didn't assimilate people like the Romans did and preferred small outposts to vast tracts of land.
Carthage would rather trade than conquer.
what romans?
The Greeks would’ve took them out, no doubt!
The Roamns lasted for 2,000 plus years. That's a very long time.
You mean Roman empire +civilization ,
Or as a cultural antiquity?
@@siddharthpandya7763 He probably means from the founding of Rome in 753 BCE until the fall of Constantinople in 1453 CE.
Yeah, I always thought Rome was the longest lasting empire we've had.
@@strictlyunreal It always blows my mind to think that Julius Caesar was more recent to us today than the founding of Rome was to the last Roman Emperor
No they extinct in the 4th century
Galicians don't claim Celtic descent from British ancestry, rather it is the British/Irish who would partially descend (at least culturally) from Galicians/Portuguese according to some interpretations of mythology (Breogan and the sons of Mile Espaine) and archeology (Celtic from the West).
is that the tartessians?
@@Alexanderscott90 Not at all, not even close
@@Alexanderscott90 Some evidence points to the Tartessians possibly being a Celtic culture or at least being Celtic influenced. It's still up in the air, though. Same with the idea that Celts developed as a civilization in Spain/Potugal and then spread along the coast and inland through rivers. This definitely breaks with tradition, so it's gonna take a while for it to be accepted if it ever does really. But we do know that the Tartessians, whatever they were, were pretty famous and admired in the ancient world (at least if they are the same as the fabled Tarshish).
xoanwahn - Tarshish is not a fable. It was a real place and with real people. There are simply different names. Tarshish is a very ancient one. The native people there were related to the ancient Greeks such as the ionians etc.
@@JM-uw8rg I never meant to imply Tarshish wasn't real, I just meant that it was fabled in the sense that its wealth and prestige were and are legendary, principally because of its mineral deposits.
Thank you for this video ❤️ Roma eterna ❤️❤️🇮🇹🌹🇮🇹
Viva Italia! 🇮🇹
Ciao fratelli Italiani
@Mathuín buchanan willie dungannon mac stefán murray that's a twist
@Mathuín buchanan willie dungannon mac stefán murray sourhern italians are more dark than northen italians but we aren't nigga
Sexy mama italia fidelidad in threat!!
If you haven't already, cover the Scythians.
Dead Roman's is a great band name
GreatSkyTroll AntiDrama A concert with them and Massive head wound would be cool.
"By Zeus" Jupiter - "Am I joke to you!"
Rome wasn't the biggest, longest lasting, etc, etc. BUT they sure left their mark in culture, politics, military, and engineering.
It was the longest lasting though. I don't think there's an empire that lasted longer than theirs if you consider the Bizantins (which you should, since they were still Romans, and Bizantine was a stupid term created by a historian in the XIX cent).
Romans still exist through their descendants. Latin Europeans and Latin Americans of Spanish, Italian, and Portuguese descent.I’m one of them. My family still retains some Roman traditions. We still and always will exist.
Eastern Roman agrees.
A. Siddharta you know the Roman Empire extended from Britannia to the Middle East, right?
A. Siddharta I can tell you don’t know about modern Latins because when I, one of Spanish descent, meet a Latin American, Portuguese, Italian, French, or Romanian person, we both recognize that we act very similar because we have the same Latin roots.
The Basque are only culturally and linguistically distinct from their neighbors. Genetically they are practically the same as their neighbors. Studies have shown this to be true.
That's not really true, there are plenty of pre-Indoeuropean genes that are unique of the Basque people (and a few random spots in southern Europe, if I remember right)
@@ludovicoliviello7753 their distinction comes from resisting intermixing with the steppe migration and much later the Muslims. But it's not much. blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/02/the-basques-may-not-be-who-we-think-they-are/#.XTN56lNlAwB
@@ludovicoliviello7753 www.researchgate.net/publication/7666676_The_place_of_the_Basques_in_the_European_Y-chromosome_diversity_landscape
What studies?
@@ludovicoliviello7753 hi, having into account that chimpaces and humans share 90 % DNA, and that all humana sharp 99,9 % DNA, I dont think
Basques or any other group on Earth have 'many different genes' from the rest of mankind. pure blood doesn't exist. regards
Extinct? But I'm right here!
haha i thought the same
You should do a video on the old Anatolians ( Hittites, Lydians, etc ) basically the civilizations descended from the first indo-europeans to settle in Anatolia
3:53 Romania paid tribute many times to the Ottomans but *was not conquered by them.*
LET’S MAKE THE ROMAN EMPIRE GREAT 👍🏼 AGAIN !!!!
No.
Another interesting and scholarly done piece. Thanks.
Why do the sicilianu/calabrese/Napolitano dialects always get overlooked? They are highly divergent from standard Italian and and have politically and culturally distinct from the rest of Italy for most of their existence up until the late 19th C
they have been dominaten by vikings, spanish and french, those ppl led to create a different society and dialects.
Could you make a video on the internal migration of the Roman Empire?
Is it even possible? If there were any data, I would love to know more on this subject too!
@@CyrilleParis I belive there is some data about the number of romans that migrated to the new provinces of the empire but i dont know more. But yeah it would be cool to know more.
How awesome would it have been if North Africa remained a Latin/Romance based culture
Why would any conquering culture have been better than the indigenous berber culture?
hey @Masaman can you do one on Sicily to clear up all the popular misconceptions people have? it has a very unique and layered history that many people are ignorant about.
The basque genetic makeup is very similar to the rest of spain due to a lot of intermixing
Yes
Very interesting, in terms of future videos I would be very interested in knowing more about the demographics of the Mali empire and the reminants of each population group today.
By Jove or Jupiter. Zeus was Greek.
By dyeus/zeus-pater
By Jove old boy! I think you're right!
Dead Romans
*Laughs in Celtic and Germanic tribes*
*Triggered in Latin*
Also
*Ugly crying face in the corner in Latin*
@evansdrad The celtic nationalist Just call some north men to beat the celtic asses
Thre Romans used the germanic tribes like mercenarys and allieds:francs,gothics,and the french-normans at the medieval age(the varengs were byzantine mercenarys too,thats why the Pope is so glad over Europe and US),and the Opus Dei&jesuits.
@evansdrad The celtic nationalist nah boi sit, Germanic gang
The cries of my people.
03:40 They don't claim they came came from celtic migrants from Britain but from preroman celtic groups that inhabited Galicia.
7:27 No! The Germanic raids and the Vandal conquest happened BEFORE the Byzantine reconquest of Africa!
U deserved a million sub atleast man... I've been following u since before u even got 100K....it's good to see you're doing great..., 👍👍
I'm just glad to be where I'm at, thanks for the support!
Do you have a video on the Vlahian people? Thank you for your insightful and informative historical videos!!!
You got the chronology slightly wrong, mentioning the Byzantine conquest of North Africa and then talking about the Germanic invasions.
I don't think the point of this video is chronology, it's more just an out of order coverage of extinct roman descendants and the factors that led to it and their end. Don't really see why this is an issue for you, just being petty for some reason.
Ur awesome Thank you for your videos you’re so educated I don’t know where you learn all this
Are u Roman???
My parents beat me
You probably deserve it
@@paununs8719
Probably
severely
I’d beat you ....making all that noise! Dammit!
Oh no, is that a duolingo excersice?! I promess to practice latin later, please dont beat up my son!
Hey man what is the music used in the video ? It’s great ! @masaman
Not the longest lasting? Uh the Roman empire lasted until 1453 AD. That's a very long time.
Hahaha
Brighton Whytock Is it true that Finland is the rightful inheritor of the title of Caesar of Rome? There is a chart out there that makes the case for it, but it seems a bit fishy.
@@zibongo6720 egypt lasted more, i would argue that while romans were not the largest, longer lasting, or, maybe, the strongest of all the empires in history, they were by far the most influencial.
Also China.
Romans still had a good run, though.
Still not the longest bro.
As a Latin Nationalist , the loss of my brothers angers me .
@@jotascript03
Based Brazuca .Saludos del otro lado del Río de la Plata .
Hey , I am Blonde and very Pale but I can still be Latin .All my ancestors were Mediterranean .Germanics do not own my Genetics .
Salve , Frater .Dios permita , por lo menos , Unión Ibérica .
God willing , we can eliminate more Angloid and Germanic influences and truly recognize our identity and heritage .Hope that Brazil can defend the richness of its heritage .Hell , re-establish the Emperor , that might help with it .
*Can you make a video on why the Philippines is not that mestizo as other Hispanic countries?*
To answer your question, miscegenation was not popular in the Philippines.
Mainly due to ethnic, cultural and religious reasons in the past.
But since the 1970s to the present, miscegenation is now acceptable socially.
distance.
Philippines is not a Hispanic country
Great video, as always, just a little correction, the last Dalmatian native speaker died in the island of Krk/Veglia in 1898 due to an Austrian bomb, his name was Tuone Udaina (Antonio Udina in Italian).
Before dying, he helped the Italian linguist Matteo Bartoli to make a dictionary about Dalmatian, today most of what we know about Dalmatian was thanks to Bartoli and Udina and the Vegliot dialect of Dalmatian is considered the most well known among the Dalmatian dialects, including Ragusean.
Well the anti-italian policy of Austro-hungarian empire hit hard italian minority in Dalmatia (that in the begging of 19th century was 20% to 30% of the population). Then with Jugoslavia almost all of remaining italians left, and Tito finished the job expelling or killing who remained, in Istria too). Istrian and Dalmatian dialect are now extinct languages and the small minority in Istria isn't really italian but more croatians who speak italian
@@andreamarino6010 Well, most of what you said is true, except the part about Istrian, in Istria there are still Latin languages besides Italian.
Istriot, a Romance language closely related to Dalmatian spoken in the western part of Istria.
Istro-Romanian, closely related to Romanian, spoken in the eastern side of Istria.
Veneto da Mar (in particular the one spoken by the Istrians), spoken by Italians, descendants of Venetian colonists who settled there centuries ago.
Unfortunately, they are all very endangered.
@@andreamarino6010
thats not truth, italian minority was never up to 20%-30% of population in dalmatia. in istria in towns maybe, but outside of coastal towns there was 100% slavic population. both in istria and dalmatia. most of italian families were italinised locals anyway. those who wanted to be or were part of higher society.
@@tiami3886 In the beggining of 1800's they were. Also, italian-dalmatian were there from roman colonisation (like the video said too), there is a reason why all the cities in Istria and Dalmatia coast had italian names (Sebenico, Segna, Zara, Lissa, Ragusa, Cattaro, Spalato and many others). In istria the situation was 50% italians 50% slavs
@@rauðaz i don't think these language will revive, I don't understand why Croatians and Slovenians need to learn them
Loved the video, tho I think you missed a great opportunity by not saying anything about the Pannonian Latins, especially considering all the recent discoveries about them in the ancient tombs around Lake Balaton
One of the best videos you've made yet.
fascinating vid, thanks masabro
10:26 Etruscans, were pretty much the original Romans. Look at the style of their ancient writing script.
Do a video on the levantine Arabs
@@niallmaw2315 he has 0 on levantine Arabs.
Levantine Arabs are one of the most ethnically diverse groups.
With Italian, Greek, assaryian, Bedouin, sub Saharan, turkish, jewish, druze, kurds etc
Technically Levantine people are for the most part not Arabs; neither ethnically nor culturally as we are so often mistaken to be. Levantine people mainly descend from the Arameans (west-Syriacs), Canaanites/Phoenicians, Hittites, and to a lesser extend from Assyrians (east-Syriacs), Babylonians, Greeks and Romans, with also some genetic sprinkles from Arabs, Anatolians, Turks, Iranian Peoples, and Mongols.
@@muhannadbursheh6109 To be fair, all Semitic people originally stemmed from Arabia, so even Phoenicians, Assyrians, and Arameans could all be considered Arabic to an extent. That definitely holds true genetically.
@@Userius1 Actually the theory that all Semitic people originated from Arabia has been abandoned a while ago, and now most scholars believe Semitic people originated in the Syrian desert and spread from there. Putting it in a very generalised manner, during the initial Semitic migrations there were 3 main groups; 1. the Akkadians, who settled in Mesopotamia (mixing with the Sumerians) and eventually became the Assyrians and Babylonians; 2. The West Semitic Group (Amorites, Canaanites, Arameans) who mainly settled in the Levant; 3. The Arabs who mainly settled in the Arabian Peninsula and parts of the Syrian Desert... Although a lot of time has passed, and a lot of mixing and melting has happened, the cultural and genealogical traits of each of these three regions still strongly adhere to that initial setup if I may say. Actually, contrary to what you stated, the genetic studies I've looked at clearly show the genetic diversion of the modern people of the Levant and Mesopotamia from those of the Arabian Peninsula. Even on a basic superficial level, you can easily tell the people of the region apart just from the facial features and general physique. Cheers
@@muhannadbursheh6109 I'm not that in the know on Middle-Eastern autosomal genetics. Is the divergence in genetics due to mixing from outside source, like the Sumerians, as you said? Otherwise I would think that early Akkadian would be the same as early Bedouin, akin to how 5th century AD Serb would be equivalent to a modern Pole rather than the more mixed Balkan version today.
I would love to see a video about the remnants of the Greco-Bactrian empire. I realize the geographic scope may be somewhat limited, although I imagine the mountain valleys make for many micro-cultural opportunities. However, perhaps another dimension could be the prominence of Greco-Bactrians through the carousel of the different empires in Afghanistan through the centuries. I do love the Greco-Bactrian Empire; I think I’d choose to live there and then over any other pre-modern culture.
Basques are the same genetically as surrounding Iberians. With Indo european haplogroup R1b
@@DJTreviCSRecordings they are not exactly the same as other Iberians they are an iron age population relic but underwent the Same transformation during the bronze age as other euros
Rest In Peace to all the extinct ancient races, tribes, and people's of Europe!!!!!
Any chance of going a bit further back? Hittites, Luwians, Sumerians, Babylonians et alia? Were the Anatolians replacing a resident population around three thousand years ago, or were they the neolithic aborigine?
You forgotten this:
es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lengua_romance_de_Panonia
Lengua romance de Panonia - Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre
eo.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panonio
Panonio - Vikipedio
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moselle_Romance
Moselle Romance - Wikipedia.
Look, I'm not saying I had bad history teachers... In fact, they were good. All I'm saying is that you make them look like they're 5th graders teaching history hahaha.
Mason, I love your videos! Your channel has quickly become one of my top 5 favorites. I'm Italian-Brazilian btw, super proud of my Italic roots.
Lucas Calixto that’s what happens when you have a class full of npcs
*_0:06_*
*_"BY JUPITER" WOULD HAVE BEEN MORE APPROPRIATE._*
I love watching these videos you do a great job I have a hard time understand sometimes it's hard to understanding the graphs.
Although i do really enjoy the videos.
My ancestry is Spanish.
I wanna learn about historical Swedish speaking lands but that would go pretty quick so how about “Dead Scandinavians” . By that I’m thinking about the Norse settlers in Greenland, the swedes in the Estonia. Fun fact though there exists a small village in Ukraine called “Gammelsvenskbyn” I believe, it roughly translated to “The Old Swedish Village”. Anyhow it got settled by Swedish soldiers during the great northern war and people are still speaking Swedish there however they’re a minority.
My favorite channel on youtube !
Imagine a Romance-speaking Yugoslavia, Maghreb, or Britain indeed!!!
Actually Morroco, Algeria & Tunisia speak French a lot. But I see what you mean
Latin North Africa would've been awesome.
And english language has a majority of its lexicon coming from romance language (through vulgar latin or medieval french).
@@elbentos7803 What I mean is, that in an alternate timeline, a Romance language evolves in Britain (starting in Roman times) from among the Celtic, pre-Anglo Saxon population with a Romance grammatical and lexical base in the same manner as in Gaul, Iberia, etc. Whereas English has a Germanic base despite much Romance vocabulary.
@@yodorob
Indeed, i once read a try at imagining what could have been a "britono-romance" modern language : the result wasn't very convincing but interesting nonetheless.
To my mind, this hypothetical language could very well have sounded like french, an evolution of west-germanic influenced vulgar latin upon a "p" celtic substrate.
I think "gallo" dialect of french (eastern Brittany) may be a good exemple of what this tongue could have been like.
One of my favorite and most unique and varied channels on RUclips, how can you beat such a great and detailed channel dedicated to demography?
How about "What happened to the Eimishi and Jomon?"
Maybe a video of what happened with the Mali empire or the aksumites
Maybe a video about the medieval culture of the Rajputs in Rajasthan India.
Hey man, great videos and excellent presentation, enjoying 100%.
Do you have any thoughts on the Balkan area ( especially Dalmatia/Ilyria ) in the 5 AD - 10 AD period?
By the year 300 the area was very romanized made up of Illyro-Romans, there where one of the best Cavalery units in the Roman Army at the time!.
@@marcelcostache2504 True. You can still find traditional horse breading and customs regarding horses in dalmatian villages. But the period between 5th and 8th AD was supposedly pretty turbulent regarding the movement of tribes and people. I'm curious how is it so, that that period has such a little sources and info.
@@serviskazot all sources are15th, 16th century fantasy novels. it's a joke. especially 1st century.
Ahem, the Romans were the longest lasting civilization.
from the 8th century BC to 1453 AD!
The Chinese?
“egyptians” were around over 3k years. i’m confused how romans was longer
soi de tolosa e parli occitan coma ma familha. a proud speaker of occitan. in recent years is being learnt more and more.
Excuse me but I think you mean 'By Jupiter'.
Make a presentation on the remnants of the Hunnic Empire please
Hi love your videos
Love from Israel
How's your terrorist state coming along these days?
Sebastian Elytron I wouldn't know since I don't live in a imaginary world
Sebastian Elytron wtf makes it a terrorist state ? You are truly ignorant.
@@thankshi2815 I read a lot of alternative media sources on hotspot areas around the world. Israel terrorizes Palestinians everyday, I hear.
Sebastian Elytron I see
You have no specific answers.
No, the Portuguese is very closer to Galician. Portugal was born after have been conquered the south beyond the river "Miño" by people from Galicia. And there were celts in Galicia a long time before some of them arrived from French Britania... Actually all the northwest of Spain and big zones of Centre Spain were areas that were populated by Celts
This makes me glad to be from Latin America
Glad why?
Latin America is a modern term, made up by...the French I think while trying to conquer Mexico. Hispanic America, or Iberoamerican is better
@8:02 can someone help with this translation or know where the image is from?
It says Alexandria and it is from the Byzantine empire
@@alexisvogel2112 I have now studied some Greek and had since forgotten about this do thank you very much!
However, Latin prevails in Science and Law in at least all Westernize Peoples.
Fantastic video! Have you ever done a video on Polynesians? It’s quite a mystery where they came from and how they populated almost every island 🌴 in the Pacific Ocean 🌊
@The Nova renaissance yeah.. that's the main hypothesis, but there's a lot of evidence of amero-Indian influence.. especially in Eastern Polynesia..
By the way, he did do a video on Polynesia (aka Oceania)..
Something I've wondered, to what extent are modern Italians related genetically to Ancient Romans? Are they the same or are there differences?
...another awesome history doc. ...yours are the best for sure ...your time and efforts are greatly appreciated and in my opinion necessary so, thank you - great job. ...could you please expand on the pre roman, ancient celts of the alps region as you mentioned and please could you do a piece on the vikings migration to italy and more specifically sicily... i was born in the mountains of north east sicily close to the coastline between st. agatha and cefelu. literally less the 50 feet above the doorway to the grotto i lived in was a nordic/norman castle. ... and immediately surrounding compagnia militari was nicosia, castel di lucio and sperlinga all of which contained nordic/norman castle structures the largest of which in sperlinga... i remember being told as a child that that entire area was one huge castle town... i don't know, i guess it's possible - maybe ...further, it was just one of a string of castle towns on the side of sicily, from the greater north east of the island to the south east of the island with the western edge as far west as gela (or terra nova) on the southern coastline of the island... once again great job sir - and thank you.
>mason says "by zeus" instead of "by jupiter"
YOU HAD ONE JOB
@masaman Do most Balkan Slavs have some Italian/Roman ancestry?
A smidge.
no, they are very paleobalkanian like Albanians, exception are west croats and slovenes
Sicilian language is near to Latin as Sardinian
i disagree it has lots of arabic and greek mixed in
@@AlbertManiscalco sure, but if you look at the sentence's structure and to the root of 70% of the sicilian words, it's pretty easy to see Latin
@@MachineGunMan yes but Sardinian is still the closest language to original Latin. No ifs ands or buts
@@dexter99999 man i know latin and i'm speak sicilian too. I don't saying that Sicilian it's more close to Latin than Sardian, I'm saying that are equally near to Latin. Search some sentences in this 3 languages and you'll see that I'm not saying anything wrong.
@@MachineGunMan you know Sicilian and Latin but you don't know Sardinian so how are u so sure?
English speakers often overlook the world-wide influence of Roman Law. In Western Europe its importance was obscured by the steamroller effect of the Napoleonic Code, but it remains live in a lot of small nations, among them Scotland, Quebec, Louisiana, South Africa and Sri Lanka.
The Latin language remains important in religion (the Roman Catholic Church) and science, especially medicine.
What do you call a happy Roman? A glad-he-ate-her.
Ba dam tsss
I would love to see a video on the cro-Magno people of Europe
"Ahh yes. Romans. I love Romans."
-Bruno
Please do a video about Ancient South American Civilizations, specially about the Muiscas and Chibchas from what is now known as Colombia
Being British of half Galician background I can confirm that Galician Celts migrated to Britain and not the other way round... Lol
Well done, Sir!
First view first post!
I think I beat you by a second if the timing it shows is correct
Nathan Perkins 🥺