This is a wonderfully informative video. Thanks so much for putting it together. Dig the chill vibe of the delivery. Makes me want to grid. Thanks so much.
And opened my mind up to the potential of going full Linux, too. There was always _something_ holding me back, but bitwig feels like a complete option for the first time
Can anyone provide more clarity on the sample and hold pulse oscillator setup. The pulse is setting a frequency for sampling to take place, I see that but I’m not sure how it relates back to our main sample rate. And why does it create the dips visualized in the spectrum analyzer? Can anyone give me some numbers to think about? I don’t exactly know how to ask the question but I want to attempt to think about if from another angle to better understand it. Thanks in advance.
i think you can directly compare it to the "pulsing" oscilators earlier in the video. if you have two oscilators playing the same pitch and detune one of them slightly, there will be times when the peaks and dips of the waveform don't match up, creating the pulse. now lets say that one oscilator plays white noise and the other one is the clock. exactly the same concept. based on what frequency your clock is set at, there will be certain frequencies where the clock always matches up with the peak of a waveform. at those frequencies, the amplitude of the waveform won't change. however, there will be frequencies where the clock is almost never sampling a certain frequency. those frequencies will be quiter. this creates the shape you can see in the analyzer. when changing the clock rate, think of it as detuning the second oscilator in the first part in the video
>>> Propaganda destroys greedy people. The program is anachronistic, old DOS style. It is very heavy on quad-core processors. It does not use the super fast memory of graphics cards. Prices from space. This means that the company has a small manager. I do not recommend this program to musicians ! I recommend clear thinking ! Greetings from Poland
Bitwig is an instrument. 🤘
hope your new series on "how to make a track" progresses again soon - nothing to do during this apocalypse except make tracks!
More from Dave please...maybe a full masterclass course? I'd pay for sure. he's amazing.
yeah, like a little Bob Ross for music production.
This is a wonderfully informative video. Thanks so much for putting it together. Dig the chill vibe of the delivery. Makes me want to grid. Thanks so much.
interesting, I found a tutorial on music production from scratch, how to make loops, samples, beats?
This is your best video so far
Bitwig has pretty much done away with me wanting any third party plugins. The possibilities are endless and I love it.
And opened my mind up to the potential of going full Linux, too. There was always _something_ holding me back, but bitwig feels like a complete option for the first time
@@els1f
This is the main reason why I switched to Bitwig. I hate Windows with a passion, and Macs are not much better.
I love this guy, thanks for making this video.
Very helpful!
Thank you for making these informative videos. Thanks!
Loved this
Cool lesson!! Thanks!
Powerful WorkHouse. imagine it first, then Bitwig it!
has the guy with the wonderful voice an own channel, too?
Can anyone provide more clarity on the sample and hold pulse oscillator setup. The pulse is setting a frequency for sampling to take place, I see that but I’m not sure how it relates back to our main sample rate. And why does it create the dips visualized in the spectrum analyzer? Can anyone give me some numbers to think about? I don’t exactly know how to ask the question but I want to attempt to think about if from another angle to better understand it. Thanks in advance.
i think you can directly compare it to the "pulsing" oscilators earlier in the video. if you have two oscilators playing the same pitch and detune one of them slightly, there will be times when the peaks and dips of the waveform don't match up, creating the pulse.
now lets say that one oscilator plays white noise and the other one is the clock. exactly the same concept. based on what frequency your clock is set at, there will be certain frequencies where the clock always matches up with the peak of a waveform. at those frequencies, the amplitude of the waveform won't change. however, there will be frequencies where the clock is almost never sampling a certain frequency. those frequencies will be quiter. this creates the shape you can see in the analyzer.
when changing the clock rate, think of it as detuning the second oscilator in the first part in the video
@@flat6_music cool that provides some food for thought, cheers!
"That's right. It's the square hole."
stayhome everybody making music
Thats what im doing! My works closed for at least 4 weeks with pay so im making some beats!
>>> Propaganda destroys greedy people. The program is anachronistic, old DOS style. It is very
heavy on quad-core processors. It does not use the super fast memory of graphics cards. Prices from
space. This means that the company has a small manager. I do not recommend this program to
musicians ! I recommend clear thinking ! Greetings from Poland