I DON'T want to be FILMED , Then DON'T walk up to me THEN.
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 сен 2024
- I Had a visit to Woolpit, started to wonder around, was told I could film no issues.. as I was walking around I was stopped by a VERY nice guy called James.. We went back and fourth for a while regarding filming to be honest it was a great Audit for myself I really enjoyed talking with James.
Unlike other people he represented the company very well and done his job as anyone would expect.
Only issue I found was the illegal number plates in the carpark but ill leave that unto DJ AUDITS for if he Visits..
Please like and subscribe to the channel leave a comment and ill try to reply to as many as I can..
#audit #auditing #citizenjournalism
James is a legend in his own mind
If he had a brain cell to think.
Bellend.
Poor old James. He’s probably very good dealing with a building, not so good at dealing with people though he got there in the last few moments. Good video.
No........there was sufficient footage timewise for fraudy to turn 'nice' and end the confrontation for a viable yt video to attract clicks and income........didn't come down in the last shower of rain bauy.
I doubt it - he's not aggressive or hot-headed and he's well spoken but he's an idiot, can't comprehend one single point being made in that conversation.
Love how they all turn their ID so you can’t see it. Until the wind got hold of James 😂
Act of God lol
Very passive aggressive man ,well handled 👏 I don't think I could have been quite so polite and tolerant.
Thank you for your support and taking the time to watch and comment L&A 👍
Their hostile public representation is reflecting quite poorly on their business at large.
16:20 And I'll repeat. It's not common courtesy to go up to someone and demand them stop doing something. If LaA was hopping on one leg, would James demand that he stop hopping. No one has any authority to demand someone else follow their directives. Not even police. Police can only make such demands when they are enforcing a law and doing their job. The only way someone can demand someone else follow their directives is when there is a contract of employment. Or is the parent of a child.
Well if you were to be a visitor in my house and you did something I didn't like, you would be shown the door. An option open when you do something on private property and you don't comply to their "demands"
@@Slotplayer1 And you make the mistake of equating your house with a "public place". Just about everywhere is privately owned, so just saying private property doesn't mean anything. And when these privately owned properties are public places, the demands that can be made are very limited compared to a residential home. So on pavements (owned by the council) you can't be trespassed. In public places you can't be made to do things against your human rights for instance. And equality laws kick in too, which don't exist in a residential home.
As to the demands made on private property. They have to have a valid reason for it. So demanding that you wear shoes when entering a shopping mall are unreasonable when its more to keep an image and especially when the mall is at a seaside town. And on the scale of things is definitely not a reason to use any force to trespass someone.
Banning photography is akin to banning your eyes. If you can see something you can photograph it. If there is any issue, it's not the act of filming but publication where someone can sue. And they can only sue for libel or defamation if the caption of the photograph denigrates them.
@@TheSadButMadLad Again you're wrong. With any public space within a privately owned grounds/property you have an implied right of access that can be taken away anytime providing no other law is broken such as on discrimination grounds. You see people being thrown out of football stadiums and you have nightclubs barring entrance based on dress code. All that this S33 of that 1972 act (a very much loved and quoted act by these auditors) does is allow the authorities to convict on public order offences in those public spaces hence that you can be arrested for spouting racial insults during for example a football match. Shops and restaurants can bar you if they want and indeed do.
@@Slotplayer1 That's my point, the public can access a public place providing no law is broken. And photography is not a crime. As for being thrown out of football stadiums, they will be because they are harassing others or causing disruption to others who want to enjoy the game or breaking the race & hate crime laws or other public order offences.
Whilst I'm no fan of s33 since it's to do with uniforms, I see it as just gaslighting by auditors. Which is exactly what police and security do when they say filming is illegal or not allowed. But the public place part of s33 appears in many places within UK legislation. So it's a commonly defined term and legal principle. Public place means that certain actions become crimes when they aren't when done in a private place. So as you say, public order offences. But anything else not a crime can be carried out, such as hopping on one leg or using a camera.
Slight clarification about the implied right of access. That is up to a point. The point being an entrance. So at a residential property, the implied right of access is the direct route to the front door. Not past it, and not wandering around the front garden. That's what allows the postie to deliver mail and parcels. Same as with any business which is accessible from the road.
A place place is any private land used by the public to go from A to B, or just wander about on even if they have to pay to gain access, such as a fairground. Case law has defined that even a corridor in a block of flats was a public place because it was used by the public as a short cut from a train station to a shopping precinct and that allowed someone to be convicted of a knife crime. Case law has also further defined public place to include the inside of a shop, even behind the counter. But not in the offices and store room parts of the shop. A path to a locked door is not a public place since there is no need for the public to use it. Case law has defined that a path to the reception of a care home for the homeless was not a public place since there was no need for the public and entry was restricted to the residents and in that case the person could not have been arrested for a public order offence.
So as you see, it's not clear cut or as simple as just being asked to leave some place on the whim of someone who perceives they have authority.
@@TheSadButMadLad It is not clear cut indeed. However, if I sit on a park bench and you come and sit next to me and start sticking a camera in my face, there is nothing I or others can do. Do this in a restaurant (a public space in the eyes of the law) and the proprietor has every right to boot you out as you've outstayed your welcome and there is nothing you can do about. It can even happen if there are no signs on the door saying photography is not allowed
I applaud your calm and very
Respectful attitude in the face of someone determined to stamp his perceived authority on you . James ego just wouldn’t let it go.
James doesn't need ways of making you talk...............you can do that yourself quite easily
I love it when people say, "would you like me to ring the police?".
This guy's simple answer, "I film them too, I really don't care", is one of the best I've heard.
i wouldnt really like you to do anything except leave me alone
That second guy was really struggling, he hasn't yet comprehended UK laws and freedoms.
He listens but he doesn’t hear! The ignorance is just unbelievable especially after being educated several times. Come on James your not In charge of the people.
your* you’re
Your - belonging to
You’re - You are
@Dr Diablory You're pretty ignorant since you should have pointed out it was arrogance, not ignorance.
That's why I couldn't do it I would lose my rag with morons I don't do fools very well.
@Dr Diablory "Ah, that means my post went over your head."
Ah, that means my post hit dead you dead-on, and you couldn't think of an argument so just said I wasn't clever enough to comprehend.
@Dr Diablory Yeah, keep up squealing.
I showed you up and now you're squealing "naaa, no you did". It's Arrogance not ignorance.
James is an argumentative chap! If only he would listen as much as he talks. He needs to learn about public accessible spaces.
"If only he would listen as much as he talks" ...........................I could only ever hear one voice .....the same in all his vids... goes on and on and on and on and
@Slapdashdumper you can always not watch these if you’re so upset ? Pathetic little troll .
When I go on holiday do I have to ask the local authority to take photos,these people are getting a joke.Because Im a manager do as I say,these people are power crazy.Then the backup turns up starts then are sent away well done on that James,but on the rest open your ears and listen and take it in.Great audit again.
James nothing will be deleted as you are now a STAR OF RUclips.....
Brilliant Audit - two adults speaking without insults, derision, sarcasm or any of the other things we see so often in these type of videos
Thank you for your support and taking the time to watch and comment L&A 👍
And thats why it was quite a dull video, constantly repeating himself rather than telling James ive explained what im doing now piss off.
@@monkeyfunk8371 How to get yourself barred from a property/business
We Yanks have come to expect such courtesy and decorum from you good Brits.
The real issue here is that ‘James’ has an absolute desperation to try to assert his authority, which he doesn’t have.
You handled that James well , looks like he's not used to having someone tell him to listen to them
James, you absolute hero. Every company needs that man James representing their company. A true British gentleman with patience of a Saint.
James, Sir, you are welcome round to my apartment for Latte anytime u want. What a genuinely nice gentleman.
As for you Law & Audits, I subscribed to your channel 2 days ago with the Bell on & you have throughly entertained me with your very interesting topics.
I am disabled just turned 50yrs young, no family, housebound & without you Civilian Auditors, I wouldn't get to see this very interesting side of Great Britain.
Thank so much.
BRAVO👏👏 James you have proved that you are a first class 🐓
8:25 No he did not ask politely. He made an unreasonable demand. There was no chit chat and polite conversation. The whole conversation up to this point was him making demands or defending illegal activities of his colleagues.
Another great Audit ! It’s amazing how some of these people manage to feed themselves 👍👍 best wishes Big P - Northern Ireland
Thank you for your support and taking the time to watch and comment L&A
Why do people 'ASSUME' they know the law? Manangers, they really think they own everything, people included.
the clue is in the name - Origin of manage
1555-65; earlier manege
@@slapdashdumper From Early Modern English manage, menage, from Middle English *manage, *menage, from Old French manege (“the handling or training of a horse, horsemanship, riding, maneuvers, proceedings”), probably from Old Italian maneggiare (“to handle, manage, touch, treat”), from mano, from Latin manus (“the hand”); see manual.
I wish I had your level of tolerance. Someone who just marches up to a person minding their own business and demanding answers to questions isn't what I would call a 'nice guy'. I think I may have asked him to go and manage his facility.
He was -
Slapdash numbnuts is a merely sad little troll .
Most 10 year old know the law on photography. They all sound gormless.
That's because they are.
Google is a good argument, there are also all the dash cams. It does amaze me that people don't want you to film a building. Mind boggling.
James is an arrogant tyrant who thinks he is King James. He did not listen at all because as soon as you started talking he constantly interrupted. Remember the main reason they are upset is not because you are there but because you are filming. When they say it's private property, perhaps you could respond with "do you own the light too?".
King James the 3rd rules all. You are under him
What other of your rights does he think you should ask him for permission? Talks like a copper, tries to act like a copper, possibly a failed copper. James has a very misguided sense of authority.
I wouldn’t say tyrant.. certainly a jobsworth.
Oh please don't edit things out...if you have skip of over dead air just speed through it. James is a bit stuck in his own bull💩! Please stop giving these random people so much personal information especially off 📷! This puts you in a bad situation. You will get privacy strikes and your channel deleted! Please be careful! COVER YOUR A$$!
🌻💜🌻
Thank you... Good point, I'll be a lot more careful from now on, especially as now we have been monetized... I appreciate your support.... Sorry about the editing, it was a long upload as was so just trying to cut down on data usage on the cameras, and computers... But I'll take it on board and adjust accordingly.. Thank you again.. L&A
@@dubhouse6237 try troll on another channel... Not interested in Liberals.. See Ya..
I have for many years worked as a Facility Manager for many large organisation an educators and I can confirm that this guy is a total tool. Missed an opportunity to talk a positive about his organisation and does not understand the law at all, keeps focused on the negatives. I wonder what he is now employed as.
17:35 One point when people say they will phone the police is that they need to be informed that if the police do anything to you or even if the police investigate and issue a No Further Action notice, they can become liable in a civil court for all the hassle and loss of liberty that you suffer. Just a kind of heads up to make them think twice. Not something required in this case, but a possible phrase to use when they are very aggressive.
Or he could just not be a di*****d and leave the employees alone. Feed the ducks / pigeons or browse the library / charity shops. He can fill his boots but just leave those actually earning a crust alone.
@@damarekonayaro5781 clearly he would have left them alone, if only they hadn't of approached him first.
@@damarekonayaro5781 Photography is just much a pastime as browsing the library or feeding birds. He did leave the employees alone until they approached him.
@@damarekonayaro5781 The employees just need to focus on their jobs and any REAL threats - not imaginary BS. Paranoia - the destroyer.
Why does this person think to protect the criminals who have intentionally sought and fitted illegal number plates to their cars who are employees but have decided to take a negative approach to a videographer not committing a crime and James fails to take advantage of turning this interaction in to a positive interaction.
I think James is being rude and unnecessarily argumentative.
james logic
you do nothing wrong " stop it i dont like it "
illegal number plate " what does it have to do with us if he does something illegal "
7:15 "These guys JUST work for me" THAT Ladies & Gentlemen Just SUMS IT UP. Absolute disgrace.
I'm sorry but this facilities manager is a total sausage head, he wouldn't allow you to speak until he realised ( oh shxt people are going to see me ) then and only then he calmed down.
Great Audit from yourself. E
Thanks E B it's really nice to have positive feedback... I appreciate your support L&A
All these people think they are entitled to talk at you not to you
NOTE THAT HE HAD HIS ID BADGE TURNED AROUND 🤬🤬🤬
And your point is?
James wasn't clued up on photography laws but was decent and I guess he will have learnt something
@@chrispollard6568 You give yourself away sunshine, where you say .. *_"Who cares about the laws"_*
You said it all about you.
@@chrispollard6568 Where did I lie? You clearly stated, *_"Who cares about the laws"_* That was no lie you fool.
If that doesn't show you as a fool then what could? Hilarious!
@@chrispollard6568 We all need to care about laws and follow them.
@@chrispollard6568 'Who cares about the laws' - law abiding citizens, the police - but not you, obviously.
Courtesy James would be letting this photographer take his film in peace
Full of his own importance, how dare you not do as I tell you
Once again we have someone who gets a chance to promote their business but is more preoccupied with being the feelings police! Opportunity LOST!!!!!
Ask the "Facilities Manager" to describe the precise threat or harm that is caused by someone capturing an image of their walls and windows!
It's James's football and no one else is going to play with it 🤣🤣🤣
Comments, leave off James. Hes considerably more polite and courteous then most!
As you can tell many people are not aware of the laws surronding this past time. Compassion is essential in this profession. Adding humour and humility is always a cherry on top!
A good bit of educational content. At least he was willing to listen.
That was a lot of repeated listening. Over and over
Bet James still don’t get it
Educational?? 🤔🤔
He wasn't listening.
Poor soul...!
James, not everyone does what you say. Especially when you’re wrong.
Calm, collective, well drilled on the laws, pleasure to watch this channel is booming 💥.
Thank you for your support and taking the time to watch and comment L&A
I reckon this chap will have a quite a lot of subscribers in the months to come.
2:45 Since he is only one of many tenants on the business park he has no authority to tell you what to do or to ask you to leave. The simple fact that there are multiple businesses means that people coming on site could be visiting any one of the businesses, so challenging anyone is rude and intrusive.
@@chrispollard6568 No such term unless we consider only YOUR "view" ... feel free to substantiate your "view"! Good luck with that!
@@chrispollard6568 privacy in public??? No such thing.
Oh, so rude, anyone could be walking about, my word, how do we deal with the climax? Should we shoot them on sight? Not a good idea at all, it would be frowned on I feel. No, let's let them wonder like lost Souls, finding their home in an increasingly climatic World. Wonders and Wonder never ceases.
@@chrispollard6568 I support anyone who has sufficient brain cells to be aware that filming anything from a public place and which the eye can see is perfectly lawful. If you haven't the required number of brain cells to register that fact, that is your problem .. nobody else's,
@@chrispollard6568 Do yourself a favour .. stop digging and showing your st*pidity!
Fishing for Fannies , you certainly caught a few there.. 😂🎣
"Its a common courtesy to come in and ask for permission to film".
But it's not a legal requirement.
It could also be a common courtesy to agree to give permission to film.
But, of course, they wouldn't give it
Oh I just find it hilarious That a country and it's big cities have more CCTV cameras than many places and yet the everyday people have an issue with cameras go figure... Keep up the great work young man blessings from the mountains of Southern Oregon
Nice to have you with us.... Thank you for your support and taking the time to watch and comment L&A 👍
@@lawandaccountability Thank you.. My DNA testing tells me I've got a bunch of Midland England Scott's and of course Norwegian. Many many years ago I spent time in the seventies and the eighties living in London. The changes demographically I have witnessed over all these years breaks my heart To do with Mariel of England as it breaks my heart to see my country demographics going a similar way borders language culture bottom line Cheers to the freedom lovers around the world coming at you from the mountains of Southern Oregon
Wow , an auditor who isn't an arsehole . You spoke well to these guys. None of that I don't answer questions bullshit. Well done
Thank you for your support and taking the time to watch and comment L&A 👍
To be fair - and there are some arseholes - but "I don't answer questions" from auditors is reasonable, especially when directed from police. Don't answer police questions is excellent legal advice, not bullshit.
James loves the sound of his own voice, he turned something positive into a complete negative
Let's follow James and film him everywhere he goes live steam it what comes around goes around
The car park is private property, you can film from a public road all you like
New subscriber. Love your energy and the way you come across keep them coming.
Thank you for your support and taking the time to watch and comment.. glad to have you with us.. L&A
Good video, though you could have called James out for 'politely' asking you not to film. There’s nothing 'polite' about asking you to waive your rights to do public photography.
Absolutely. Classic passive aggressive personality.
What's with this 'politely' anyway. People think they can tell other people what to do and ask impertinent intrusive questions . . . as long as they do it 'politely'! I would politely tell them where to go.
This is James. James has a badge. In James head that makes James important. James takes his job very seriously and gets to feel validated every single day. Be smart like James.
Another great video....imagine if you had kept silent,James would have blown a fuse🤬🤬
Old uncle albert came out then went strait back in tail between his legs.😅😅
4:40 There is no such thing as common courtesy to ask before taking a picture of a building. If there was, there would also be the common courtesy of not approaching random strangers and making demands of them. Would it also be common courtesy to close your eyes and to only open them after asking? That's basically what he's demanding.
James is an OK guy. He was out of his comfort zone and wasn’t really listening to your reasoning. I wonder how he’ll feel when he sees the video.
He's an ignorant clown.
James could start by educating himself on public photography, then if he wants to restrict it, he can put down his barriers, and put up specific exclusion notices.
Probably something he should have done early in his employment , but here is an opportunity to enhance his skill set , as they say.
He was pretty good in some ways, but when he did not get the answer he wanted , his mind was closed to other opinions ( which he has probably found out by now we’re better informed than his. )
He'll look at the vid but not listed to it 😕
That he acted like a prick.
the bit you walked to was very reminiscent of German buildings built in the Bauhaus school of Architecture in the 1930s 👍L&A
I can't believe you are so calm, talking around in circles with that twat. Facilities manager/coordinator is just a fancy title for maintenance handyman
I love the look of confusion on their faces when they approach someone with a camera and asks what you're doing 😂😂
I've heard "don't walk towards a camera, then" almost 1 thousand times, but it still makes me laugh every time.
A solitary man armed with a ferocious camera is certainly a huge issue these days
2:30 Once you'e got the images on your uSD card he has no say in where the images go. The images are your property to do with as you please. The only thing he can do is sue if the images are published and a derogatory caption place with the images. But he would have to show how that has caused him "loss". And as for not wanting it to appear on RUclips, which is part of Google, then has he also demanded Google remove all streetview and Google Earth images of his building - and having just checked they're still there on Earth.
Well James can make a RUclips privacy complaint with a good chance the video may well be removed by RUclips and there is nothing this auditor can do about.
11:10 A private site doesn't mean anything about barring the public from it. A shopping centre is a private site but the public freely wander around it. All a private site means is that the owner has to maintain the infrastructure such as roads, pavements, etc and not the council.
And can set their rules etc. A cinema is a private publicly accessible site but it doesn't give you the right to just wander in and watch a film without payment.
@@Slotplayer1 And once the public have paid, they can do anything they want. Actually in the cinema screen itself photography and filming is banned - but there is there is a valid reason - protection of intellectual property and copyright. In the foyer, photography can't be banned for the reason of protecting privacy as it is a "public place". The only part of the foyer where any reasonable expectation of privacy exists is when someone is using their card to make a payment.
@@TheSadButMadLad You are wrong. You have an implied right of access to a private place that has public access but that implied right of access can be taken away at any point providing no other law (such as discrimination for example) is broken. Night clubs for example can bar you entrance based on dress code, despite the place being a public accessible place in the eyes of the law. Whether you can or can't take pictures is irrelevant.
@@Slotplayer1 Nightclubs are again not the same as an open car park or shopping mall. Dress code in nightclubs is not about image, but about safety of others And to be honest (and it has been a long time since I've been in one) none of the nightclubs I visited in my youth ever had dress codes.
As for implied right of access. That does exist, but not for every private property. A shop can use it to ban someone who has shoplifted in the past. They can't use it just because someone is doing something different to the norm. A person can issue it for their own home against companies and their employees. But a shopping mall can't use it against people who have broken some minor policy, since it more akin to a footpath/highway as it's a route people use to get to individual shops.
But you are right about photography. It's irrelevant. Any removal of access should be about the person and their actions, not the thing they are holding. Using a camera itself can't be a reason. Using a camera to stalk or upskirt is a reason.
@@TheSadButMadLad They are the same because they are privately owned spaces that the public has an invited implied right of access to that can be taken away at any time at which point if you don't comply you will be tresspassing. If you don't agree with the rules of such properties (such as no photography allowed) then don't enter. Many entertainment venues prohibit you taking your own food and drink with you and despite it being a public space there is nothng you can do about.
His 8 hour shift consists of coffee at 9 till 11.15,. wonder about so people can see you came to work, lunch at 12- 14.15, a little nap till 15.15, tea break 15.30 - 16.15. Bit of paperwork. Clock out 16.45. Rinse and repeat.
Another one that does not know photography laws. Thinks his building cannot be filmed, well if his building wants to be hidden build a 10ft solid brick wall around it. At least he did listen to you though he still didn’t like it. You did articulate yourself very well though, especially with Google cars filming the building. Keep them up. Have subscribed.
4:10 You don't need to ask anyone's permission when you are in a public place. *And you don't need to ask anyone's permission when you are standing on private land.* Permission is only required when the photograph (or video) is going to be used for commercial purposes and they are a key part of the image. Commercial purposes is defined as "the promotion of a product or service" so basically advertising or marketing. That's why one of the T&Cs of many public events is something along the lines of being at the event gives the organiser the right to use your image for any marketing purposes. In other situations, a model release form is required which absolves the person of any control of their image in return for payment. And if a contract is arranged, then copyright can be held by the person and not the photographer.
@Captain Black Yep spot on. This Sad But Mad Lad keeps giving out false information
Just caught on to your channel today, 2nd video I've seen. Good vids so far👍
Thanks RD I really appreciate the comments and the support.. I hope you enjoy the others to come, L&A
Passive aggressive, He did not like you however polite.
I just carnt understand why people in this day and age when a camera is seen people get so worried n scared back in the day people loved to be filmed or even said hi mom . .. .if I saw a man with a camera idr be like knock yourself and enjoy your freedom ,free publicity these days is a win win win to the decent or professional person...think about it !!! 😉 just smile and embrace freedom
Ok wat if someone comes to film outaide ur house?
"carnt"?
@@WolfInADen what's wrong with that? My garden gets filmed all the time. Should I contact the police?
To be fair James was a good guy and he was polite throughout, i own a business and if ever i got to the level that company is at i'd like someone like James to run it, he only had interests of the company at heart and the workers, so from me it be a 10/10
He really is not used to people saying no to him
17:44 how funny would it be if you had a notepad and pencil instead of a camera and he came out screaming "OMG, where are you going to post your notes!?"
Good interaction, well done!
Does James ask if the senior management of Sainsbury's ask for his permission to record his shopping habits? Oops he probably goes to Waitrose to buy two for the price of three. The building was of superior quality to James. Thanks for showing the value of a prawn.
Lil word of advice..get a wind muff 🤣🤣
OMG he asks u questions then wont let you answer! Yes, old Jimmy boy may be a manager in his building, he is out of his jurisdiction when speaking to members of the public outside and he has no right to give directives to you. You were spot on here you were polite, calm, knowledgeable and respectful. Good interaction LaA 👌🏼👌🏼
I find James infuriating. Asks a question, but then doesn't want to listen to the answer. Stubborn and arrogant man. Even after being informed of the positives. The first guy was cool and respectful and assessed that being out in public, you had every right to photograph a building and that a camera is not a threat to a building!
James likes to argue for the sake of arguing doesn't he? Keep flapping the gums James.
He doesn't get it. He's not getting it he'll never get it .
Exactly. These soy boys are a joke.
Facilities manager, probably the hardest he's worked all week. All they do is get other people to do their work for them.
‘I need to know’. No you don’t, you WANT to know. It’s an entirely different thing.
Perhaps James would like to give you a call everytime he drives his car 🤣🤣🤣
Nice one pal, that was really good, liked and subscribed.
Thanks Jon.. I appreciate your support and taking the time to watch and comment... I really appreciate it.. L&A 👍
The police really are not interested in private number plates , if anything it makes it easier to identify a vehicle with a private/ illegal plate than a conventional one.
After being a bit bristly I think James settled down well enough. We do have to understand a lot of people are misinformed and a bit protective, but this auditor had a lovely calm, articulate approach and this did a lot to diffuse the tension. Good audit
Count the number of eyeblinks per minute and he's about three times the average. He thinks he's smarter than you and should be obeyed and not questioned, each eye blink dismisses you.
You must obey me because I,M JAMES.
How can so many people still be unaware of auditors and what they are after. We all know he has no interest whatsoever in the business or how many solar panels it has etc, he just wants a reaction and this guy is yet another that just cannot help himself. Mildly entertaining as it is I still can`t fathom why seemingly intelligent people continue to get drawn in. 😂
'Yes, I know it's publicly accessible'
It was at that point that because Bob Bubker wasn't present, the facility manager knew he was out of his pay grade...
“Do google knock on your door, and ask can we drive past and film your building?” 🤭😂
Good of James to brake gdpr and tell the world who owns the property 😉
I think James just loves to hear himself talk. Could you imagine the conversation at home if he has a wife that's the same, lol OMG the noise level in that house.
14:10 how did he time-travel from 1950 to 2022? it's like he's never heard of cameras before
You are the first person I have seen point out that they let Google travel around the country taking photos. It always makes me think what have they got to hide🤔👍
I bet James tor into the guy with the beard, you could tell he was angry when he first approached you. Nice architecture 👍😁❤️
Said before, don't give channel name, they can try and get video removed, don't make it easy for them
The wind noise wasn’t loud enough.
You might wanna fix that!
😂💀
Good gods......James is stubborn. You made such good points and yet he gave you so much static!
Dont you just love that buildings are publicly access able providing you are only doing what we say, otherwise they are private.