Loaded Law: Handgun ban sending some sports on slow death marches
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 май 2024
- Canada’s handgun ban is meant to keep guns out of the hands of criminals, but gun policy experts say it’s a misguided policy and as Cristina Howorun found out, could be sending several popular sports into a death march.
C21 is a joke, waste of money.
Yes- the handgun ban was off target, statistically the last person that’s going to commit a crime is a restricted gun owner.
Restricted gun owner?! You mean criminal
@@stvargas69 the last person to commit a crime is indeed a restricted gun owner he is correct, criminals get there gun illegally so a ban wont change anything
@@stvargas69 no- I mean someone who has done 2 separate firearm safety courses and had to pass both a written and practical test with each. Not to mention they’ve been through 2 levels of vetting with the RCMP to make sure they’re not a criminal.
@@stvargas69 No they mean a gun owner with a restricted gun license (hand guns are restricted in Canada). The last person that will commit a crime will be the person that is educated, licensed, and their gun is registered and tracked by the government.
I think they meant “registered”
Trudeau is the reason why Canada needs a second amendment.
Quebec in general is….
you should actually read the Canadian rights and charters.... in Canada we actually have some better then the constitution in usa bubba do read what are chartter says..... be surprised how little you know.
@@antlerr sounds like you have not read our charter, because it is a fact you didn't based on your rely. The U.S Bill of rights is far better then our charter. Our charter allows the government to decide what our rights are.
@@antlerrSection one and 33 would like to have a word.
@@antlerrSection one and 33 would like to have a word.
Trudaue has to go. He’s ruined this perfect country
his masters…
White people ruin every single country they're in.
Canada wasn't perfect before Trudeau, But the average Canadian enjoyed much more freedom. I've never voted before, but the next elections cannot come soon enough.
Spawn of castro!
He's the best prime minister this country has seen in 40 years. I can't wait to vote Trudeau in 2025!
It isn’t registered firearms that are a problem in Canada it’s the unregistered ones that criminals use. Citizens should be allowed to obtain a gun after going a thorough back ground check and severe punishment if it’s mishandled.
they know this, this is about disarming a population for takeover.
It's the number one reason why people are dying. Your words are pretty much allowing kids being killed every day.
Wait until conservatives are in the fed and it’ll be reversed.
We need more severe punishment in the states they arrest and release gun criminals and others on a same day basis and than wonder why we have such a crime/gun problem like maybe if crime was actually illegal and they spent time enforcing the laws we already have instead of making a a bunch of useless gun laws that don’t protect anyone except the criminals but eh i guess its easier to punish law abiding citizens for the criminals actions rather than do their job and deal with the fkn criminals
Yep yep US has that the NICS background check, with "prohibited persons" not being allowed to have them, and strawman purchasing has been illegal in the US for decades.
Canadian gun laws in a nutshell:
> Let's ban "Assault Weapons" and not the arrest those committing crimes.
> Ok now let's ban handguns because the first one didn't work.
> You don't need a hunting rifle also because criminals use them.
> Leave the keys for your car or house out in the open and unlocked.
Pierre has said publicly that he will repeal C21....And more.
So did O'Toole. I hope you're right, though. It just means we have to keep up pressure on the Conservatives even after they're elected.
@@ericferguson9989otoole………the tool, he was from Ontario right? Like Kenny, I swear to this day this is the east trying to infiltrate our only western hope to have a common sense government. I never paid much attention to Harper, now when I listen to him talk I realize how smart he really was……..from Calgary right? Pierre…….grew up in sask and Alberta? The only type of people that get our side of the country!
so one more reason not to vote for that MAGAtard.
He said it but I don't see it happening. Restrictions will get worse everyday moving forward. If you don't believe that your lieing to yourself unfortunately.
@@onlygreen2261If harper had remained in power then this country probably wouldn't be in the kind of mess that it's in right now. And i'm talking about a lot more than gun laws here.
As soon as someone said “it’s complicated” when trying to explain something,immediately tells me he doesn’t have the answer😆.
That individual has no clue or is just towing his party line.
It's complicated means its BS!
He's a Justin Trudeau supporter. Bet he thinks that the carbon tax will have an impact on climate and stop the forest fires set by left wing nut jobs lol
Notice he didn't blink a single time...?
ROBOT!
It's just another form of lying.
“You can’t use a gun for self-protection in Canada. It’s not a right that you have,”
Justin Trudeau
Unless you are Justin Trudeau then you can be surrounded by them, at the Canadian taxpayers expense.
it’s communism
Self defense isn't a right Justin Trudeau can take away from you.
@@jimidcanada Correct, which either makes a Canadian or not.
Trusty Justy needed 100 armed police to escort him from a restaurant in Vancouver. Who do we believe is the real threat to safety and liberty in this country?
"You can't use anything to defend yourself outside safety whistles and hiding behind the cop's back..." "What? A well known crackhead's chasing you with an axe? cops will be there in an hour to talk things out."
City news: Law enforcement all over this country uses civilian gun ranges to train. Bill C-21 will result in many rural ranges shutting down. This will mean fewer places to practice and if it’s too annoying to practice, they won’t do it. This will result in diminished skills and resulting risk to public safety.
Good point
Absolutely.
You are 100% correct. And your statement isn't just an opinion, or conjecture, the head of the OPP and many other Chiefs of Police have made that statement. Most rural RCMP detachments rely on civilian ranges.
JTF2 relies on a civilian range. People that hunt rely on civilian ranges.
That is their plan. Death by a thousand cuts.
I’m surprised they haven’t passed a lead or noise pollution law yet.
Law enforcement is not the same as civilians. And if there is a need for law enforcement to have a gun range then they will find a way to have one. Simple supply and demand curves. Basic economics.
Just remember next election.
It’s already almost to late tbh that goof has done so much damage to our country yes we could fix it but it would take alot
@@cvvxtp3878 agreed, it won't be fixed in my lifetime.
@@cvvxtp3878 it will take YEARS for commonsense to fix the cancer Trudeau has injected into our nation. However, good people like you understand that it will not be a quick fix. Please let us ALL learn the lessons here and NEVER vote for the authoritarian socialists again (Liberals or their NDP lapdogs)
This narrative of fear and control must end.
you sound $tupid.
In reality, legally purchased handguns end up being less than 1% of handgun crime. And most of those a crimes of negligence.
actually just over half of gun crime committed in urban areas is with an illegal gun (so just under half is with a legal one). While just over half of gun crime in rural areas is with a legal gun.
Also all guns start of legal somewhere. If not for the legal gun there would be no illegal gun.
Also a gun owner is far more likely to use their gun in a crime then someone that doesn't have a gun.
You are so wrong on every aspect of your remarks. Please refrain from making yourself appear as idiotic as c21 @pacman3556
@@pacman3556most of those “legal guns” are stolen. And just because someone does have a gun doesn’t mean they will use it illegally… Background checks and other precautions are taken to reduce the possibility of a gun being in the hands of someone who will use it illegally.
Same goes for a car or a knife; Just because someone has it doesn’t mean they will use it for crime.
@@anthonygrande5293 yes they are legal guns that were stolen. You have reinforced my point. Gun owners should be held accountable.
I never said a gun owner would always illegally use it. I clearly said that a gun owner is far more likely to use it illegally then someone that doesn't have a gun. And it has been proven.
@pacman3556 Actually it’s statistically proven that fire arms owners in Canada a far less likely to use a fire arm in a criminal way. 90+ percent of fire arms confiscated from criminals in Canada are fire arms that were smuggled across our border.
No nothing cop says “it’s complicated “. Translation… I’m talking out of my a$$
It's just an excuse to say it's to stop crime.
In fact, they just don't like the idea of ordinary citizens being armed, so they use crime as an excuse to ban guns.
you sound foolish.
💯👆
it does reduce crime. A simple comparison of countries that do ban guns and have strict laws to a country like the US that has little to no laws and a vast supply of guns proves it works. And you don't need to be armed. Ordinary citizens don't need to be walking around with weapons. You sound foolish.
@@pacman3556 People often think of gun laws in the United States, but the truth is that many countries around the world thrive with guns in their societies.
And it's not you or anyone else who decides whether it's necessary for ordinary citizens to arm themselves and have weapons.
It's your freedom to decide you don't need to be armed.
For others, however, it is up to them to decide for themselves if they feel the need to arm themselves.
Here in the USA we have plenty of laws restricting guns and although the laws vary by state some of the worst states for crime are states with strict gun laws such as my home state of New York which also shares the border with Canada.
Scrap c21
The politician said the ban will help stop crime but didn’t give any justification. He just said, “It’s complicated” and that he believes it will. No facts. No examples. No specifics. Just feelings. Typical.
then when asked if it will make criminals have a second thought about getting a handgun, he said naw
pretty simple to understand. Reducing the guns in our society means less guns that can be used to commit crime. Any comparison of countries that ban guns and have strict laws to a country like the US that has little to no laws and a vast supply of guns proves this is true. You can't shoot people if you don't have a gun.
The first Saturday in June every year is National Range Day. Go to a gun range hosting an event and see for yourself how safety is the #1 priority. Smile, laugh, learn, and theres usually food.
So many say "if it saves one life, it's worth it". Legal carry saves thousands of lives a year, but that never gets brought up.
Of course not. That would go against WEF’s agenda.
If banning abortion saves one life, is it worth it 🤔
It's is not and never was about saving lives. It's about removing control from the average citizen and consolidating it to authoritarian government. Criminals choose safe targets on purpose. The government and antigun groups never have or will entertain ANY solutions other than "ban more/all guns". They actually depend on there being crime and shootings to justify more authoritarian laws so they don't want any solution to work other than the one consolidating more authoritarian power.
legal carry doesn't save thousands of lives. But people that don't have guns saves lives. You sound foolish
@@pacman3556
obama did a study with fbi, atf, and cdc to ban guns.
the report found over 5million crimes are prevented or stopped by citizens with concealed carry permits.
the proposed legislation and ban was stopped because the findings.
SO THERE IS THAT.
Yes. Gun owners in Canada aren't commiting crimes.
You can illegally own something ya know. Food for thought.
@@keonyang3332You knew what he meant: licensed gun owners in Canada aren't committing crimes.
@@wilfdarr Well the way they worded it implied that libtard saying: "they ain't a criminal until they are."
we need an election
No we don’t. Elections are rigged, how do you not know this? What we need is a mass rebellion, which will never happen because way too many people are plugged in and will defend the system.
Why do people need guns? Take them off the street!!
Wait they are not on the street.... not the legal ones anyways. But for some reason, if they get rid of the legal registered handguns, all the illegal guns will be gone right?
all guns start off legally somewhere. The "illegal" guns on the streets were at some point in time legal somewhere. Also not all crime is committed with a "illegal" gun. Fact is a gun is a gun no matter what you label it. People have no need for a deadly weapon on our streets or in our homes that end up on our streets.
@@pacman3556 nope. 👎 There are illegally manufactured guns.
@@pacman3556 I mean I can understand you're point and I don't completely disagree with the sentiment but it's a very slippery slope. It's very easy to want to ban something you don't care about but think about what it would be like if someone was trying to ban something dangerous that you care about?
@@pacman3556hahaha sure
@@pacman3556 You're insane! I'm not surprise anymore by the comments of many people, so much mental illness in the world right now.
My neighbour 2 doors down from me had his door unlocked for what ever reason, he has the right to live as they want. Someone sneaked in and he chased them off with a stick. What if that person was armed with a machete, knife, gun, several attackers? should the only option for tax payers be a stick or fists to defend from invaders who maybe possibly armed. Canadians are so pacified you find virtue in being a victim...its pathetic!
Justin Trudeau:
September 2010: "Herein here is the first step of registering your guns is just the first step towards taking away guns from everyone. That's never going to happen because here in Canada we have a culture that has grown up with, has, respects the need to go out in the wilderness to shoot things from time to time."
May 1 2020: “Effective immediately, it is no longer permitted to buy, sell, transport, import or use military-grade assault weapons in this country.”
Do us all a favour, do the research, show us how many people in Canada that hold a firearms licence have been charged and convicted of a firearms (not paper) offence. We all will not hold our breath. BUT THIS FACT should have been in your reporting. Let's just say in the last decade. How many ?
How about some statistics on how owning a handgun has prevented or stopped a home invasion in Canada? I can't remember a news story of a home invader being stopped by a gun owner.
@@scottdavies4969well it’s because all mainstream media is funded by the government and one of the many narratives is to not show any positives to owning guns? Where have you been? It’s like all the negative media on oil and gas yet not one person living today can go completely without it?! Time to climb out from under your rock and pay attention to your corrupt leaders agendas!
@@scottdavies4969wow, do you live under a rock? All Canadas mainstream media is funded by federal government and they would never show anything that might go against liberal agenda. Instead Trudeau is pushing that you cannot use a firearm to defend your property or family, I know for a fact if I was under the impression I might get shot breaking into a house I might think twice……..Florida sheriff that told the public to start using your weapons to defend your homes and save taxpayer money now has the lowest house invasion numbers in all of Florida within 2 months. Do you know how many car jackings happen in Montana or South Dakota? Next to if not 0! Why you ask? Open carry, you gonna try stealing a car on the freeway knowing full well the guy might have a gun on his hip? When you know no one can have a gun, the prime minister is telling people they can not defend them selves against criminals there is not even a deterrent. There are many liberal agendas being pushed…….like never showing any positives for oil and gas yet not one person alive today could live without it? All the yoga pants and windbreakers citiots use daily, every plastic thing even recycled water bottle clothing is petroleum based and takes petroleum to make, transport. That includes charging your electric vehicle……from the cord you plug it in with to the vehicle itself. Our oil and gas is produced very responsibly and cleanly produced meanwhile china is so irresponsible, all our financial suffering will not make a dent in greenhouse gas levels globally. However if we woke up and got the LNG project finished and could send liquified gas to china to use instead of coal that would make a big difference and help our economy! Wake up people, our country as we knew it is gone, Trudeau has made every single thing he touched worse……..some things are unrecognizable.
@@scottdavies4969 well 9 times out of 10 using a gun of any fashion in home defense will result in charges, as our laws are written to make it difficult to realistically use a firearm in self defense of any fashion. From use of force, to storage laws there will be charges. There are cases where home defense with a firearm are ok, usually with a long gun, there are also cases where people with firearms bans get away with self defense with a firearm even when they weren't legally allowed to possess in the first place.
@@jakefrasier8482 so it sounds like there is no practical value to owning a hand gun.
What about the kids sports like Paintball and Airsoft that have already seen the death march? None of those markers should have ever been banned, let alone forcing complete businesses to close like Flagswipe in London...2025 cannot come soon enough!!!
They weren't banned. Not sure what you are talking about. That amendment was removed from C-21
That dude literally said he doesnt know how c-21 will affect criminals because its still new and no one knows how it will work against criminals…😂😂😂
Imagine that, cracking down on gang violence instead of blaming inanimate objects for crime.
Only until we get rid of the current ruling party in Canada.
And when might that be? Seems like you’ve been bitching about Trudeau and company for decades.
@@lightningdriver81as soon as possible. We are being held against our will.
I'm going through the comments here and I don't see any one supporting this. That's how crazy this is
then you are not reading enough comments or only reading the ones that support your belief.
@@pacman3556 THERE ARE NONE IM SCROLLING THROUGH AND SEE NOTHING
@@andree1991 keep reading
There are alot of anti gun people out there. Some people refuse to listen to reason and just go off pure emotion it seems.
@@pcakes1878 you have not listed anything that was reasonable. You just babbling out nonsense.
According to you guys...big brother that is. You realize nobody is stopping anything just because a tyrannical government and media say so😂
Used to getting away with too much, this will change in the coming years…
you sound delusional. Laws or no laws someone like you should never be allowed to hold a gun let alone own one.
Fair, honest reporting??? Did you bump your head citynews???
How about non compliance?
expect government storm troopers at your door with orders to..
They know about the registered handguns owned by legal firearms owners. When you pass away the cops will be at your door to steal your private property from the grieving hands of your family before they can settle your estate.
@@ThinkPolisComing4Me Yeah that's right, they can't solve real crime, but they have a list to kick in doors. FJT
This type of language hurts your case b/c it says to the average Canadian "I don't like the law so I am going to be a criminal".
The parties that pushed this law do not represent the majority of Canadians...
The fact that 1 person can do this to an entire country should tell you everything
who is that one person? And what are they doing?
Wow...theyt found the one cop who disagrees with the rest of his brothers
Don't think he is a cop, my money says politician/spokesman
Definitely not a cop. They would have identified him if he were and you’d be hard pressed to find any cop that supports C-21, they see it for the horseshit it is.
And he totally undermined his own position...
Because they flake out after the higher ups offer them a little cash to say what they want.
@@kevinmccubbin2385 "you think this will help"
"yeah totaly"
"will it make criminals think twice before getting a handgun?"
"oh, no, absulutly not"
not word for word, but yeah, ether they are so dumb they think they are in the right, or they do, infact, have alteir motives
Staff Sgt Tudor you might want to follow what the Chiefs of Police associations across Canada are saying. You are WAY OFF buddy!
If you guys think for 1 minute this is about safety of regular people you are so misinformed..take a look around at what this government is doing ....wake up!
you sound $tupid.
Law abiding citizens continually targeted.
nope gun owners being held accountable.
@@pacman3556 Automatic daily background checks, registering firearms, training/licensed .
I think we are fine thanks
@@16golfr56 police do not show up every day at every single gun owners home to check their firearm and well being. Automatic check is electronical to scan for recent arrests etc. But thanks for the pointless comment doesn't do anything to address what was said. Stop commenting you look foolish.
@@pacman3556 You’re trying to look smart but you look quite dumb 😂
@@pacman3556 Do you support Indigenous Rights?
Canada needs its own 2nd amendment type laws Law abiding Canadains need to be able to carry weapons for self defense this should include pepper spray and tazers and firearms clearly police and politicians can't protect us its up to ourselves Canada needs its own stand your ground laws and castle doctrine!!
no we don't. We don't need that dystopian nightmare that is going on to the south of us here.
@@pacman3556 what are you going to do when a group of teenagers storm your house with handguns while you are at home?
@@NBAFan18 The idea of a group of teenagers storming your house with handguns is laughable at best.
@@pacman3556 Google "armed home invasion Canada" and tell us how many news stories come up.
@@pacman3556 it’s literally happening in Canada that’s why I brought it up. Funny how you don’t even understand and aren’t aware of this.
All we have to do is wait until Poilievre gets in in a year and a half and this wont be a problem any more
If you think Poilievre is any different then Trudeau and has your best interests at heart then you are just fooling yourself.
@@pacman3556 sounds like a Trudeau supporter cope tactic 😂
@@hardatak nope I don't support Trudeau and you have a sad pathetic life if it revolves around one man. Trudeau is living rent free in your head🤣
I can’t believe the Canadian people allowed this to happen.
Calling this joke choker “staff sergeant” must be painful for those around him.
How ? " It's complicated " , and we're still waiting for an answer .
This Albertan says scrap C21 !
who cares what you say. You are a wanna be MAGAtard
They really had to dig to find a cop who would actually say that C-21 will have any positive effect whatsoever. Even that fell apart with one question.
a simple comparison of countries that ban guns and have strict gun laws proves to a country like the US that has little to no laws and a vast supply of firearms proves banning guns and strict laws works.
@@pacman3556 we already have about 20,000 gun laws on the book at local, state and federal levels in the US. Adding any more gun laws ain’t going to do a thing nor banning them does not mean a forbidden individual cannot acquire a firearm.
@@Silent_Ears This is not the US. This is Canada. However before you reply....do the comparison. You are wrong. Had you done the comparison you would learn banning guns and strict laws works.
Even a comparison of times when the US had strict laws to times when laws were not as strict proves it works.
You don't know what you are talking about. Go back to your mommy's basement.
@@pacman3556What? Lol
@@tbnone2501 if you are confused by anything that was said maybe have someone with a little more education read it and explain it to you. But thanks for the pointless comment. I take it as admission you can't address or refute anything that was said.
3:19 if you have to "digest" for this long, that means they clearly don't know what they are doing.
The criminals won't give them up. Why a law abiding citizen should be punished is just dumb.
When a politicians says' something is complicated when defending a ban or law, you know it has no benefit but to enrich or increase said politicians' power.
I appreciate the positive coverage of our hobby. Thank you.
Criminals will have guns no matter what the law is but good law abiding citizens won't.
Trading freedom for a temporary illusion of safety is NEVER a good trade !!!!!!!!!!!!
does it means that less guns in streets also comes with cops giving up their guns as they wont have to fight guns anymore.... be defensseless in order for them to feel safe....
1- police are not considered citizens while on duty.
2- London police don't carry guns because it is safe.
You sound foolish.
2:48 love how when asked his answer is "uh uh um well uh its still new so we don't actually know what impact its made if any um uh but believe me there is value in the ban; but criminals still wont care and get handguns anyway." in what clown world does that make sense at all, if you yourself say the criminals wont care then what is the value in the law that affects law abiding citizens???
Legally owned handguns are not used in crimes in Canada. Show us the data that shows otherwise.
Staff Sergeant whats his name totally self owned on that interview.
Pier river Poilievre said he would repeal all of Trudeaus gun ban legislation and do a top to bottom review of the legislation remaining. This includes removing some offences from the criminal code and putting them into regulatory offenses. Things like forgetting to have your valid firearms licence in your possession. That would be a fine like forgetting your valid drivers licence when you drive your car.
Trudeau is the reason Canada needs a second amendment.
People often forget that you don't even need a license to own a car, only to drive one.
@@kinggrizzly13 you sound $tupid.
Balanced reporting on firearms law - congratulations, I'm officially amazed. Keep up the good work.
Great video. Canada already has ample restrictions. What Canada and the US needs to do is improve the lives of at-risk demographics before they become criminals. That’s the only real way to prevent violence.
In Fallout, this is why annexing Canada was such a breeze.
Christian Howrun is the best reporter ShityNews has.👍
Another reason to despise Justin Tyrant.
Banning handguns doesn't stop criminals from getting there hands on them, with the ban its actually easier for bad guys to obtain handguns than it is for law abiding citizens. Criminals will find a way to get them and your putting them at a advantage while making law abiding citizens defenseless and at a disadvantage.
nobody ever said it would completely stop criminals. It is meant to make it more difficult for criminals. Why do you want to make it easy for them?
Respectfully to SSG C.Tudor, You've done law enforcement & your community a disservice. Saying a gun ban is good because "well it's complicated & we don't actually know yet" is peak goof behavior. But at least you're honest about criminal behavior regarding the ban.
a simple comparison of countries that ban guns and have strict gun laws proves to a country like the US that has little to no laws and a vast supply of firearms proves banning guns and strict laws works.
@@pacman3556 stop spamming, you sound foolish.
@@pacman3556 the uk banned them and theyre still plagued by bombings and stabbings and hit and runs. All its doing is making the good people easy targets for the criminals to pick off
@@pacman3556 That's a whole lot of words to cope & lie. You can buy literally everything you need to make a make-shift firearm off Amazon. Japan has some of the strictest gun laws in the world, look where that got Shinzo Abe for your "proof" that it works.
Criminals don't care about Bans & Laws, It emboldens them by making softer targets & makes Canada as a whole weaker.
A few years ago the local police chief pointed out that the total number of violent handgun crimes involving a legally purchased firearm was exactly zero. Not almost zero, just zero. So now we're taking steps to prevent zero violent crimes, and I believe we'll succeed.
your local police chief is wrong. Just over half of gun crime in urban areas is with an illegal gun so just under half is with a legal gun. And just over half of gun crime in rural areas is with a legal gun. There are plenty of examples of gun owners using their guns to commit a crime.
@@pacman3556This was specific to handguns. The chief knows the stats rather exactly, and displayed every firearm in question. One was homemade, the rest were smuggled.
@@trentreimer130 odd how you want to be specific to handguns only but will use all firearms in examples when you think it supports you. My stats still stand. Also smuggled guns does nothing to help you. Smuggled guns proves that banning guns and strict laws works
@@pacman3556 ? This video is specifically about handguns. You are the one introducing off-topic stats to make a point. And those stats may stand, but the stats that pertain the original topic, handguns, stand. As to strict handguns laws working, I think there is a point to be made there as there was a time when legally purchased handguns were used in crimes. That time is in the past, the situation was solved, but there is an interesting segment of people are now insisting on punishing law-abiding people for no rational reason. They are proposing a law that prevents zero crimes. What is the motive for pointing law enforcement resources away from criminals?
@@trentreimer130 your local police officer is just that....local. Stats are stats and my stats stand.
Legally purchased handguns still are used in crimes. There are plenty of examples of legal gun owners using their guns for crime. Also pretty much all guns start off legal somewhere so pretty much all crime is with the use of a gun that was at some point in time a legally purchased handgun.
Nobody is punishing anyone. We hold people accountable for their actions. Removing guns from a society is proven to make that society safer so there is more than enough rational reasoning behind removing guns from a society. Nobody is point law enforcement away from criminals. In fact by removing guns from our society it allows law enforcement to free up resources that would be used to monitor and regulate guns in our society and use those resources to provide more focus on criminals (and border control etc).
Leagal hand guns = no crime !
and how is that working out in the US?
@@pacman3556 Quite well. Once Ohio passed constitutional carry the crime went down significantly across the board in that state.
@@gabecollins5585 you seem full of $hit. The US is a $hit show of gun violence. The next three countries after them combined are still not comparable to the US.
2:12 - what?!?! then why not ban cars? i mean, if it is ONLY about saving lives. cars take more lives than guns...
Tudor needs to go back and check the facts
Thank you for bringing light to this issue. It’s not only killing the sport but also the ranges that support the sport. Our membership numbers have dropped massively since the ban and I’m not sure how much longer it’ll stay open. A range where rcmp, conservation officers, fish and wildlife officers, and lumis officers train and do their yearly qualifying. It’s got this Canadian concerned. Where do these people go when the gates close?
and you thought you live in a 'free' country?
we do.
@@pacman3556free to do what?
name 1 thing that doesnt require
permission
registration
license
tax?
@@robdavidson2569 pacman3556 is likely a bot channel, born of the C 0v! d year 2022 - likely the free country of China . . . or owned by such. They have to say they are free or get a free trip to a burial pit. That, or AI writen by Xi. Appologies if I am wrong in assuming such - in which case, what country pacman?
100% of criminals Wear shoes, don't forget to Ban shoe's Canada
LEO & Armed guards also have personal handguns & AR platforms that they use to train.
Law enforcement and armed guards are not considered private citizens. They also don't take their weapons home at night to play with. And I know a lot of people that are in law enforcement and surprisingly not many of them have personal guns at home (many are like the rest of us....they don't take work home with them)
@@pacman3556 another individual who wants to be part of the conversation yet has no clue what they are talking about.
LEO outside of SWAT have to train with their own personal firearm.
There are no "shooting ranges" at the "division" & they cannot take their "duty firearms" home.
Get educated.
@@1ABNDT no they don't. I know people in law enforcement and they train with the issued firearm. They also don't train on private civilian owned ranges. They train in law enforcement facilities. So yes there is someone here that wants to be a part of the conversation but has no idea what they are talking about....that person is you.
@@pacman3556every police force is different, and not all forces have ranges.
most LEO train on their own time, with their own personal firearms.
@@robdavidson2569 all LEO get paid to train. They do it on company time. You are a fool to think any union member would be working for free on their own time (which includes training)
Thank you for showing you neighbors down south what "reasonable" gun control ultimately looks like when unchallenged.
People who are anti-guns, and those who have no clue about firearms need to be educated about firearms and know the regulations and Canada’s licensing process so they can see how safe law abiding, licensed, RCMP daily vetted sport shooters, hunters and collectors are…..🤔🤔🤔😉👍🏻👍🏻🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦
criminals get their guns from the supply of legal guns. Also a gun owner is far more likely to use their gun in a crime then someone that doesn't have a gun. Not very law abiding. Time they are held accountable.
@@pacman3556quit, everyone is laughing at you.
@@jakefrasier8482 because you are an id$iot and cannot understand what was said. But thanks for the pointless comment. I take it as admission you can't address or refute anything that was said. All you have done is proven what an id$iot you are.
@@pacman3556 what 😂😂😂
@@pacman3556looks like we found Trudeaus secret youtube account.
It is like to having new bills to be enforced for ban chef’s knife from the kitchen.
Citizens should not need to ask the government for permission to own the means to defend themselves (often from the very government that they require permission from).
They are also a popular handgun with people that wish to defend themselves.
regersting guns leads to gun confiscation. just ask any surviving jew from WWII.
gun control is about turning regular people into slaves.
not about safety.
Rights should never be traded for anything. Never! Rights should never be considered as currency.
In Canada gun ownership is a privilege for things like Collecting, Hunting and other sporting purposes.
Self Defense with guns in Canada will get you in a lot of legal trouble.
In the United States it is a "Foundational Right" recognized by our government and the "core right" is "self defense(US v Heller, US Supreme Court).
My local sheriff/city police chief strongly encourage civilian gun ownership for self defense and readily issue carry permits so that when I'm out in public, I'm able to defend myself and others.
2 percent of US Counties account for half of our gun crimes.
70 percent of gun crimes are directly/indirectly a by product of both the illegal drug trade/gangs.
Broken families
Create
Broken individuals
Which
Destroys communities
Of course gun control isn't about
Public safety
The real purpose is to control people.
It Canada, people are subjects
Subject to government control
In America, we are sovereign citizens
We are supposed to control government.
What??? Real reporting??? Been a while, good job.
thank you for your fairness. unusual for MSM now a days. Bravo City News- keepin it real-you got my sub
(Thankyou for leaving the comment section open to create dialogue, unlike CBC)
Sgt.Chris Tudor talks out of both sides of his mouth.
The People of Canada really need to get a Term Limit on Prime Minister’s position in Canada ?!!🇺🇸🇺🇸👍
you are on the wrong video du$mb a$$ this one is about hand guns.
Registered owners vs unmarked or smuggled weapons. Do they destroy the handguns they confiscate. Its only a matter of time till knife crime goes up. Just look at the data from countries that already went through it. Has any country succeeded in reducing gun violence… a state or community?
Criminals aren't going through the hoops law abiding citizens are. Black market sales or stealing legal ones off of citizens.
Not a Canadian, so I won't say much, as I don't have a dog in the fight. However, as once stated by Ben Franklin-"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." Canadians therefore, if threatened by external forces, DO NOT deserve the assistance of the United States. Neither monetary or military.
“It’s complicated” is code speak for I don’t have a good answer for why this law will ever work. And what that really means is the reason that we are using for why this bill became law is not the real reason for why we passed this law.
Bunch of nonsense
Frankly, I'm shocked that this wasn't a hit piece on the legal firearms community, although the stats are conveniently being left out.
Seems someone is attempting to keep their journalistic integrity while getting ideological push back.
+99% of gun crime is committed with an illegally smuggled gun by an often repeat offender. Licenced gun owners are actually less likely to be involved in crime than your average unlicenced citizen.
Had 100% of the proposed bans and legislation been passed, +99% of gun crimes would have still happened.
Going after criminals on the other hand would lower crime across the board: theft, car jacking, fraud, assault, stabbings, home invasions etc etc and yes, shootings because criminals will be criminals.
So...do we destroy a part of the economy, over step property rights and waste money? Or actually address the problem?
Just look at the statistics for criminal use of handguns before and since the UK banned them
Can't rely on UK crime reported stats because the UK only reports convictions, not crime reports. They also count multiple victim homicides as a single homicide, and then, only upon conviction. Unsolved murders are not counted in the crime stats.
Canada needs to smarten up on the laws and the antiquated ideas about "guns". More youth programs in low socio-economic areas and tougher laws need be enacted, not punishments on those obeying the law.
Why does the reporter not state that majority of criminals get there firearms from the states through smuggling
That woman can also protect herself and her family from criminals because she has a firearm.
If the people cave to this there freedom is short lived.
one glance at some countries of the European Union (and the UK pre-Brexit) clearly shows that outlawing guns doesn't prevent crime in general.
The gun itself isn't the problem at all; but social dissatisfaction, lack of education and social cohesion are.
Poverty, unemployment and substance abuse (incl. alcohol) aren't factors per se, but can surely contribute on a larger scale.
By indiscriminately banning firearms altogether, especially in countries like Canada (or Australia for that matter), the problem of street crimes and gang violence is just blatantly not affected at all.
actually comparing countries in the EU proves that strict laws does work. The top five EU countries combined don't even come close to the gun violence we see in a country like the US that has little to no laws and a vast supply of guns.
And the gun absolutely is the problem. You can't shoot people if you don't have a gun.
Also your example of Australia that does ban guns and has strict laws also proves that strict laws and banning guns works.
A ban just proves the punishments havent been fitting the crime. The ban sounds definitive but its ultimately pointless when aimed at the people who do not listen or care.
So as a law abiding citizen you are SOL when the outlaw arrives on your doorstep!
You are not allowed to defend yourself with anything other than your fists in Canada.
The rest of the world always said they don’t get why America has a second amendment. Now you know.
Everyone should apply for a PAL license. Then you'll understand what goes into it in terms of safety training and background checks and the fact your name is screened daily in law enforcement system to ensure compliance.
Off target it's like whoever came up with the idea was shooting blanks.