Hope you liked this cursed video, tell me whats wrong and what you liked! PS: i know its not a russian tank , its soviet but in RUclips soviet BIAS doesn't fits well.
@@TheDAWinz создан он был в УССР , а так как в Украине декоммунизация , то получается , что т64 российский . Таким образом можно вообще все разработки УССР присвоить России
@@vaevictis2789 Downtier? I meant uptier, those poor things from 8.3 facing this. Armour is not to get shooted just to prevent dying if you get shooted. In the other hand, this thing has darts with enough penetration to send to the gulag anything it faces which is not from its BR.
@@kasparkannel3108 anything that > 400mm pen is virtually the same on top tiers, same vulnerable spots, same non pen spots for 410mm pen shell and 550mm one. Id argue that angle performing and spalling are much more important characteristics for apsdfs at this point. Getting back to the armor - t64 has weak hull and atrocious survivability, while Leo, abrams and vickers are hard to one shot and often even hard to cripple with first shot due to big internal volume. Saved my ass in vickers countless times and burned my ass even more times when perfectly landed shot in leo2 side didn't kill commander and i got instant revenge with no chance to survive
Да не, ерунда всё это. танки блока нато в этой игре шатают рандом от 9,3 и до упора. Главного качества советских танков тут не представить - количество, дешевизна и лёгкость производства.
Шатают, потому что наши танки катают против младших танков, у которых чудесный боекомплект в корме башни не взрывается через пробитие лба башни или через пробитие борта. Когда ОБТ только ввели, то МВТ/KPz-70, XM-1 улетали в ангар после пробития лба башни, т.к. лом летел в боеукладку и та благополучно взрывалась. Естественно, что НАТО плебс сразу завыл, они не смогли против Т-64А/БВ. Слёзы, истерики, крики и боеукладочка у НАТО инвалидов перестала взрываться. Ну вот так. Ну и такие мелочи, как карты исключительно для УВН - 10, старые карты усердно перерабатывают под НАТО. Пример- бойница на Новороссийске и балкон на Пепельной реке. НАТО дают максимально возможные характеристики, наши же доказывали, что лом 3БМ-15 не имеет скорость и баллистику фугаса 125-мм (да, именно такие параметры ему дали на ДЭВ сервере и ещё говорили "А вы докажите, что это не так"). Ну и занерфленные скорость, динамика, скорости ВН и ГН, занерфленный урон всех ОБПС. Или как недавно вскрывшаяся "ошибка" с РЛС у всех наших зениток, когда 10-ти кратная ошибка при введении цели для баг-репортера не была ошибкой и народ начал тыкать мордой уже разраба. И такого море.
@@InfideI только за то что вы всё это написали - 5!. Я это знаю но уже устал писать. С збт танков как повелось так и ничего не изменилось. Ещё кривые дамаг модели можно вспомнить, схемы бронирования намеренно изменённые. Много чего. И да, западный игрок решает потому что он платит, а сейчас извините капитализм. Как бы прискорбно это не звучало.
The T-64 is a Soviet tank manufactured in Kharkiv, and designed by the KhMDB. The tank was introduced in the early 1960s. It was a more advanced counterpart to the T-62: the T-64 served in tank divisions, while the T-62 supported infantry in motorized rifle divisions. It introduced a number of advanced features including composite armour, a compact engine and transmission, and a smoothbore 125-mm gun equipped with an autoloader to allow the crew to be reduced to three so the tank could be smaller and lighter. In spite of being armed and armoured like a heavy tank, the T-64 weighed only 38 tonnes (42 short tons; 37 long tons). These features made the T-64 expensive to build, significantly more so than previous generations of Soviet tanks. This was especially true of the powerpack, which was time-consuming to build and cost twice as much as more conventional designs. Several proposals were made to improve the T-64 with new engines, but chief designer Morozov's political power in Moscow kept the design in production in spite of any concerns about price. This led to the T-72 being designed as an emergency design, only to be produced in the case of a war, but its 40% lower price led to it entering production in spite of Morozov's objections. At present the T-64 is in use in very few nations or regions, but is currently undergoing significant factory overhauls and modernization in Ukraine. The T-64 formed the design basis of the Soviet T-80,[3] which entered service in 1976.
T-64 player actually grinded for the tank so they are usually better than turms players
Hope you liked this cursed video, tell me whats wrong and what you liked!
PS: i know its not a russian tank , its soviet but in RUclips soviet BIAS doesn't fits well.
Very good song chose and incredible edit, pls continue with these videos
@@levirochadearaujo5877 thank you :)
Since Russia is the successor to the USSR, this tank can be considered Russian
@@Oberkkommando T-64 was designed and produced by the Kharkiv motor plant. T-34, T-44, T-64, T-84
@@TheDAWinz создан он был в УССР , а так как в Украине декоммунизация , то получается , что т64 российский . Таким образом можно вообще все разработки УССР присвоить России
I got my T-64A a couple days back I researched APFSDS yesterday and was shredding enemies.
The most aesthetic T-series in game.
i love the Style that ERA makes in those tank , so beautiful!
The T64 B is very good, i just hope i have the era
You see BT 5
In 1.0:😊
In 11.0:💀
I have no idea why this went to 9.3 it was already good at 9.7 its armor is great and access to 3bm42 and now at 9.3 its just disgusting
Because no mobility, no angles, no reverse, extremely cramped, 3 tankers crew, ammo rack all around the crew
@@vaevictis2789 Tell that to 8.3 tanks
@@ghostwinter3351 well, downtier sucks. I wish i could do something against 9.3 western tanks with my t10m, but life is hard
@@vaevictis2789 Downtier? I meant uptier, those poor things from 8.3 facing this. Armour is not to get shooted just to prevent dying if you get shooted. In the other hand, this thing has darts with enough penetration to send to the gulag anything it faces which is not from its BR.
@@ghostwinter3351 yeah sorry, i meant uptier
crazy almost like it has a bugged turret giving it 1000mm of protection on its cheeks :)
Bias fact : It has the same turret as the bvm , at 9.3
Isn’t that the t64a tho
oh no i'm wrong , thats was the t80b i think
@@user-jc2in3cp3g yep, not the B, and the A will soon have the turret bug patched in the next update or so, currently in Test Server
This and the t72a for backup just amazing
T-44-100 enjoyer here. Can't wait to buy my first T-54
Thats also a nice tank too !
what the hell , chainsaw man opening song in the backround HAHAHAAHHAHA
Still more bias of how bad the enemy team is, wish I could even once play against these :
From: t64bv player
Same thoughts. Normally they can see you across the map and trough all buildings
Based comrade very based good work
I like my ztz96, it can pen almost everything except the turret of t64 since it's bugged
I like your style, but You had my soul when I saw the Joe Rogan clip lol great work
Glad you enjoyed it
Video on soviet tant without soviet march music? Impossible
I wonder why gaijin thinks a tank thats better than most 10.0 tanks belongs at 9.3?
Leo 2, abrams, vickers mk7 absolutely rips t64b, what are talking about?
@@vaevictis2789 t64b has better armor and a better round than the leo2 at 0.7 br lower
@@kasparkannel3108 anything that > 400mm pen is virtually the same on top tiers, same vulnerable spots, same non pen spots for 410mm pen shell and 550mm one. Id argue that angle performing and spalling are much more important characteristics for apsdfs at this point. Getting back to the armor - t64 has weak hull and atrocious survivability, while Leo, abrams and vickers are hard to one shot and often even hard to cripple with first shot due to big internal volume. Saved my ass in vickers countless times and burned my ass even more times when perfectly landed shot in leo2 side didn't kill commander and i got instant revenge with no chance to survive
you should bring some HE
Bussian Rias.
B stands for bias
Who wins; m1a2 Abrams or a bt-7? We both know the damn bt7 wins.....
BT 5 in 1.0:😊
bT 5 in 11.0:💀
I prefer t72a, but t64b slaps
I understood the music theme, its chainsaw man?
yessir
@@DefaltThunder ohhhhh yeah
Смотрю и это видео, и думаю. Почему тебя так много игроков не пробивают.....
I just cut the parts where i get killed for not making a very boring video....
Так и есть, многие просто не туда стреляют)
@@dferefeed я играя на нем даже шальные выстрелы ловлю :(
Так он вам всем и сказал что просто вырезал моменты где его убивали🤷🏻
Хоть переводчиком бы пользовались
i dont know what they are talking about , i answered the first comment right i think
Очередные ущемленые о месте создания Т-64, боже.
Is this chainsaw man opening music?
Yeah
why did u use the chainsaw man opening
Its nice
Да не, ерунда всё это. танки блока нато в этой игре шатают рандом от 9,3 и до упора. Главного качества советских танков тут не представить - количество, дешевизна и лёгкость производства.
Шатают, потому что наши танки катают против младших танков, у которых чудесный боекомплект в корме башни не взрывается через пробитие лба башни или через пробитие борта. Когда ОБТ только ввели, то МВТ/KPz-70, XM-1 улетали в ангар после пробития лба башни, т.к. лом летел в боеукладку и та благополучно взрывалась. Естественно, что НАТО плебс сразу завыл, они не смогли против Т-64А/БВ. Слёзы, истерики, крики и боеукладочка у НАТО инвалидов перестала взрываться. Ну вот так. Ну и такие мелочи, как карты исключительно для УВН - 10, старые карты усердно перерабатывают под НАТО. Пример- бойница на Новороссийске и балкон на Пепельной реке. НАТО дают максимально возможные характеристики, наши же доказывали, что лом 3БМ-15 не имеет скорость и баллистику фугаса 125-мм (да, именно такие параметры ему дали на ДЭВ сервере и ещё говорили "А вы докажите, что это не так"). Ну и занерфленные скорость, динамика, скорости ВН и ГН, занерфленный урон всех ОБПС. Или как недавно вскрывшаяся "ошибка" с РЛС у всех наших зениток, когда 10-ти кратная ошибка при введении цели для баг-репортера не была ошибкой и народ начал тыкать мордой уже разраба. И такого море.
@@InfideI только за то что вы всё это написали - 5!. Я это знаю но уже устал писать. С збт танков как повелось так и ничего не изменилось. Ещё кривые дамаг модели можно вспомнить, схемы бронирования намеренно изменённые. Много чего. И да, западный игрок решает потому что он платит, а сейчас извините капитализм. Как бы прискорбно это не звучало.
Pobre TAM :( 🇦🇷
:(
WHERE ERA??? WHERE IS IT!!!
I was unlocking It ahahah
Отличный танк
Ussr*
Looks like Nato armor not going to stand against soviet tanks
T-64B is the best tank you can have, bvm sucks
T64 its Ukrainian tank
URSS tank
T64B is a ukrainian tank.
Хорошо, дай знать
Если так говорить, то советский, а не украинский
The T-64 is a Soviet tank manufactured in Kharkiv, and designed by the KhMDB. The tank was introduced in the early 1960s. It was a more advanced counterpart to the T-62: the T-64 served in tank divisions, while the T-62 supported infantry in motorized rifle divisions. It introduced a number of advanced features including composite armour, a compact engine and transmission, and a smoothbore 125-mm gun equipped with an autoloader to allow the crew to be reduced to three so the tank could be smaller and lighter. In spite of being armed and armoured like a heavy tank, the T-64 weighed only 38 tonnes (42 short tons; 37 long tons).
These features made the T-64 expensive to build, significantly more so than previous generations of Soviet tanks. This was especially true of the powerpack, which was time-consuming to build and cost twice as much as more conventional designs. Several proposals were made to improve the T-64 with new engines, but chief designer Morozov's political power in Moscow kept the design in production in spite of any concerns about price. This led to the T-72 being designed as an emergency design, only to be produced in the case of a war, but its 40% lower price led to it entering production in spite of Morozov's objections.
At present the T-64 is in use in very few nations or regions, but is currently undergoing significant factory overhauls and modernization in Ukraine.
The T-64 formed the design basis of the Soviet T-80,[3] which entered service in 1976.
@@DefaltThunder made in Kharkiv, so its Ukrainian
@@yulik2284 Made in Ukrainian Soviet Socialistic Republic, a part of Soviet Union, so it is Soviet
where did you see a Russian tank in a Soviet tank?
Its Just for the title, soviet BIAS doesn't fits welll in RUclips
Dude, that's Ukrainian tank, made in Kharkiv...
Ukraine was in the URSS at the time
Its not russian tank its Ukraine tanks!
Oh Jesus , please ready the pinned comment
Вроде реально украинский
Soviet tank.
@@novivan3942 Советский, его собирали со всего совка в Харькове.
@@YaTupoNaMeste вообще его можно и российским назвать из за того что Россия правопреемница СССР