DEBUNKED: Verse of Quran Proves Muhammad ﷺ Lied
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 окт 2024
- #HaqiqatShow #Haqiqatjou #muslimskeptic
Full episode: ruclips.net/user/li...
Support our work with a donation: muslimskeptic....
MuslimSkeptic:
Newsletter: muslimskeptic....
Twitter: x.com/muslimsk...
Rumble: rumble.com/c/M...
Daniel Haqiqatjou:
Twitter: x.com/haqiqatjou
Telegram: t.me/haqiqatjou
Full episode: ruclips.net/user/livebvMwjT1Vu-g
Support our work with a donation: muslimskeptic.com/contribute/
Love the work
Jesus actually taught Islam but after him ppl changed his message.
Mathew 9.13 - God prefers mercy not sacrifice.
Heb 9 (unknown author) a sacrifice is needed.
Deut 12.31 - man sacrifice is pagan.
Mark 8.12 - this generation gets no sign.
Mathew 12 the later gospeI adds sign of jona... - more change.
Mark 12.29 God is one.
Numbers 23.19 - God is not a man.
James 1.18 - God does not change.
Any verse saying Jesus is God applies to others.
Jon 10.30 father & I are 1.
Jon 17.21 me and my disciples are one like God.
So is God 1 or 15? Can't be 3 in 1 is consistent.
Here is a verse overwritten.
Luke 3.22 nrsvue footnotes said earlier manuscripts say h spirit says TODAY I BEGET THEE - as an aduIt so Jesus is human only.
Ehrman said to licona gospeI accounts are not reliable.
Mark 15.40, mathew 27.55, luke 23.46 all say Jesus's crew were at a distance so likely didn't see.
They all say Simon carried the cros.
Jon says disciples were at foot of the cros but denies simon who many think was switched with Jesus carried it.
This proves Quran 4.157 right, they didn't see a cruciFICTION but guess.
As for resurrection.
Mark 16.9 to 20 are added
Mathew 28 & luke 24 disagree if final meeting is in galili or not.
Jon 20 says go to other tribes but this contradicts disciples fighting pauI over going to other tribes & Iaw.
Mathew 15.24 says I am only sent to my tribe.
So Monotheism, no sacrifice needed, no cruciFICTION or resurrection but Iaw & tribal ministry just like Islam says is Jesus's original message in the 4 gospels.
James the leader after Jesus didn't say a word of paul's new Iawless cruciFICTION faith but faith then works like Islam says, he is a buffer between the real teachings and PauIy-theism.
Mathew 21.38 to 43 says the cruciFICTION attempt will make his tribe lose the blessings to the fruitful aka Ismail in genesis 17, Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him is from that tribe.
Please, Ustath Daniel, more refuting, less mocking of physical appearance. It's a bad influence on your viewers, and I've always seen commenters who go out of their way to ridicule somebody's look or way of speech.
(ولا تجادلوا أهل الكتاب إلا بالتي هي أحسن)
Problem with his argument is also that basically he is telling us to believe in the Quran.
This is what I was thinking! Lol
He accuses Muhammad peace be upon him but proves Quran is Allah’s/ God’s words !
@@travelandlearn5961 why not ?quran has prove himself when scientis fine the body if pharaoh in 19 century while quran is the only scripture talk about it at 7 century
All we see is Mockery.
@@abdulrosyiid7682 not trying to argue but I think there are things about Pharoh in Bible too , both Moses(peace be upon him) & Pharoh
@@IngeniousGuy-p3v yes the quran is confirm that taurat and gospel is from God too but the different is in the quran Allah save the body of pharaoh after the drowning and in bible is just drowning this is prove that quran is complete the taurat and gospel
He says we are not logical but he believes 3 in 1.
False. He believes God is One in three. One essence and three persons. I thought you guys claim there's nothing like Allah and he's beyond our comprehension, but when the Trinity comes up, you toss that out the window because it's too complicated for Islamic followers to understand.
And if you read your Qur'an the supposed unitarian islamic deity keeps calling himself "we" Is there any true understandings of why these pronouns change? WTF 🙄
The "royal we" excuse for Allah using the plural personal pronoun is apologia and makes little sense.
@@XRay-T50 yeah so basically 3 in 1, got it. Still illogical.
@@Humaira36858 God does not operate within the boundaries of human logic.
@@XRay-T50 still one in three , even a child will tell is its illogical and doesnt make any sense , its 3 seperate persons co equally god , and the jesus said father is greater then i , so it means their are jesus is not god cuz he's dependent on father so u got 2 in 1 😂
@@XRay-T50
There is no such thing as human logic, it is logic period. And by definition God can't be something illogical, not because of a lack of power but because of a definitive impossibility.
Allah states "had he", which means he didnt.
Christians don't have reading capacity don't mock them
They will ignore it intentionally
I like this answer better than daniel's, just answer it straight up it's better than talking about faulty translations
Subjunctive mood, in this case an imaginary situation. They are surely foolish.
@@SimpleReally Because translations are so unreliable, you wouldn't understand most of the Quran as it's clearly is put in the Arabic form
the audacity of a christian using the phrase "logical thinking"
😂👌🏼
fr😭
Islam showing the religion of “peace” colors again 😂
@@logic109 Islam means "Peace" and "Submission" because Humans find peace in submission to the One True God but oh how can someone who repeats like a broken record understand a concept like that
@@logic109 go and cry in your empty churches😅
Kaffir don't believe in Muhammad SAW as a prophet, but used Qur'an verses to debunk Islam. So ironic...
Ikr!!!😅
And he said logic. Logic from a Christians mouth 😂😂
3 in 1 people just like the coffee
Guy is from David Wood school , man these Christians are really funny
How twisted is the logic that he is proving the Quran true by alleged fulfilment of this verse but the person who brought the Quran is a false prophet auzbillah 😂
@@kanjarize high IQ stuff out here 🤡
David poop
The artery is the arorta!
That's why he doesn't translate what the word means in the Hadith!
😂
The death of the prophet ﷺ did not occur suddenly, hence it does not fall under the intention of the verse
1. The surah is makki, and the prophet ﷺ died almost two decades later.
2. The poison was given by the Jew in khaybar, 7th year after hijrah
The prophet died in the 11th year after hijrah.
So again, it wasn't a sudden death, nor can you definitively say it was the poison that actually killed the prophet...
Some scholars have said that Allah wanted to grant the prophet the status of martyrdom, hence the pain of the poison resurfaced
The quran says that the jews killed prophets.
Similarly, they tried to kill our prophet ﷺ.
They tried to poison him.
They managed to kill one sahabi by the poison.
The prophet ﷺ lived for 3 years after the attempted poisoning, and at the time of death he felt as if the pain from the poison resurfaced.
The verse on the other hand implies a sudden death if the prophet lied upon Allah; a seizing by the hand, a sudden cutting of the aorta.
Hence it's clear that the verse of the quran in no way belies the prophethood of muhammad ﷺ
So using the Christian's logic, the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) was a false prophet (astagfirullah), but the Quran and Allah are true. These guys officially have no argument.
Look look, even if it was from poison, even if it was his aorta being cut, during his death he was accompanied by the Angel Gabriel whom was saddened, no false prophet would be accompanied by such angel of that calibre lmao. Even the angel of death asked permission to come inside Prophet Muhammad SAW house lmao dude is so high IQ
Subhan Allah. All this we know about our Prophet ﷺ and more. Yet the Christians know nothing of Jesus pbuh except for what is written in their corrupted Bible from authors unknown. No wonder they hate us. The jealousy is obvious, they can bite on their fingers in rage.
Tqvm for your clarification brother 👍
not to mention the verse said if he invented ''SOME'' sayings (baadha al aqawil) ..meaning according to their logic he wasn't lying for the first 99% of the message cause the verse said the punishement will be fast and severe and sudden.. not to mention Allah told the prophet in verse 5;67 to do tabligh of the message and that he will protect him and the protection was limited till he does tabligh of the message which was the case and as soon as the deen was complete (with the verse of completion of the deen) his mission was over..PBUH. according to this guy's argument..God for whatever reason didn't punish him suddenly and waited for him decades until "the damage is done" and he recited that he competed the message.. to take him lol
This argument is aslo easily refuted with a simple question. Did the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, die from a severed aorta? The answer is no. These young fools are so arrogant, instead of spending their youth learning, they spend it thinking they already know.
That man also indirectly admitted that Quran is Allah's word .. not man made by Muhammad.
Exactly. For those studying in the medical field, they would know that if you sever the aorta, you wouldn't even have time to say "I feel as if my aorta is being cut".
Instead, you'd have sudden shortness of breath, altered mental status and rapid loss of consciousness. The person would die immediately. The prophet S.A.W exhibited none of those symptoms.
Gen Z can only think about views.
@@rahatzaman8120 Exactly. For the principle by which he attempts to invalidate the Prophet, peace be upon him, he must validate that which validates the Prophet in the first place, which is the veracity of the Qur'an.
These people are compounded in self-contradiction and self-refutation, which is a sign of undeveloped intellects and the lack of the principles of reason. These kids are 100 years too early to be able to even attempt a critique of Islam.
there is even an easier way to refute what he said. if he believes that prophet Mohammed (pbuh) is a false prophet, how can he use the Quran that he's the one who shared with his companions as something from god for his argument
Christians need to understand that the Quran is read by contexts not Verse the like the Bible
@@rahatzaman8120 Yeah, I laugh alot when christians use this argument because it shows they subconsciously know Islam is the truth!
Bible also needs context. They cry about it but purposely take our verses out of context 😂
@@Sg190th So when Jesus called all non Jews dogs and Jews their masters what isthe context of that ?
@@Sg190thgod isn't a man says the bible, whats the context of that??? but ur bas➕ard God is a man, father and holy spirit, lmfaoooo😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Christiana don't apply the same criticism to the Bible, though. Because if they did, they would find it full of contradictions. Not to mention that the Bible does not confirm their fundamental beliefs. So this whole argument exposes their hypocrisy.
Barak Allahu feek Brother Daniel for defending the Deen from these conniving kuffar.
Take off the aluminum hat
Son of God does not mean that God has a child in Christianity!
*what a mistake in the Qur'an!*
*what a mistake in the Qur'an!*
Allah himself testifies that he has a son and he is the son as Christians understand it! Only the Koran writer was too ignorant to know what Son of God means! Allah's word which created everything is Allah himself too! *The Word Allahs which created everything is the Son of God according to Christianity!*
@@tomolo2619’Son of God in the Bible’. Question, who wrote this in the Bible?
My friend don'tplay ignorant !! Because the fact is that the Koran writer didn't even know what Christians believe in! And if Paul1or anotherhas corruptet the Bible in the 1st century or not, it doesn't change the fact that according to the Koran Allah has no idea about Christianity and that in the 7th century!!!
@@BinYakub80 Everyone sees you straying from the topic! With a statement that does not solve the problem in the Islambook!
full life of 63 years ~1400 years ago, protected from assasins, enemies and mistakes - Allahumma salli 'ala Muhammad.
Bro got browed!
Unbrowed
From what I've read from tafsir of scholars, Al-Wateen (the life-line artery) refers to a specific part of the Aorta that if it were to be cut, the person would almost immediately die (E.g ascending aorta), while Abhar is not specific, so it can refer to the abdominal aorta or the thoracic aorta.
I stopped taking Christian apologists seriously a long time ago, but it’s still nice to see videos like this for pure entertainment
Paul is the liar while Muhammad (SAW) is the truthful
Show me one source from the earlier Muslims describing Paul as a liar?
I met Moses in the 6th heaven is a claim without any evidence. 😛
@@XRay-T50 man he said (For if the truth of God has increased through my lie to His glory, why am I also still judged as a sinner? ) romans 3:7. the verse “‘You wicked servant!’ the king roared. ‘Your own words condemn you. is just for him.
@@XRay-T50
Paul acknowledge it himself. no need for other people to accuse him.
1 Corinthians 9:20-23 KJV
READ IT YOURSELF
he PRETENDED to be ANYONE so he can win people
@@XRay-T50
last time i checked, pretending to be someone youre not is LYING.
well.. unless youre an actor acting in a movie or something.
now I think none arabs criticizing islam are worse than arab ones
that was a full blown humiliation
Surfer dude just got cowabungaed
Hahahahahaa
Because Muslims go after the weak not the strong. They actually flee, ask Saladin who fled from a 15yr lol😂
@@logic109 are you strong? I hope you can stay consistent and not run here
And making fun of Salah-ad-din's Generosity and King Baldwin's tolerant nature?
You better not run from here now
@@logic109 Running away like Scam Shamoun??? Come back
@@Idkgrass I’m strong, Islam acts to much like a gang. I’m strong as one with god alone
They put this "argument" a lot. They all seem to "learn" from the same source.
May Allah bless you Daniel.
They also use a lot the verse 39 : 4.
it’s so simple, how can he be a false prophets but also prophesied exactly how he would die?!
Yup, it's a paradox.
Even if it’s true than the prophet is a real prophet and the Quran is a revelation
It means that God held Muhammad to his word.
Muhammad was taunting God, telling God "kill me if I am a liar."
And God said, "My pleasure."
Clearly u didnt watch the video. The word in hadith is abhar. Abhar is not part of the wateen. @rrost1500
@@rrost1500 where did prophet muhammed pbu taunt God?
@@rrost1500dude watch the video and come out of your delusional bubble
@@aqeel2859 Wateen is a specific portion of the Abhar. They are referring to the same form of death. His central vein was cut, because he was a false prophet.
قوله تعالى ( و لو تقول علينا ) هنا حرف ( لو ) هو حرف امتناع الامتناع فيكون معنى الكلام ( لو أن محمداً تقول علينا لأهلكناه و لكنه لم يفعل ذلك فلم يجب حينئذ معاقبته ) ، هذا أولاً ، و ثانياً العقوبة ليست هي قطع الوتين ( الموت ) لأن الموت في حد ذاته ليس عقوبة و لكن العقوبة هي ( لأخذنا منه باليمين ) أي لحرمناه من النبوة و الرسالة و الوحي ، و هذا لم يحدث بل أتم الله تعالى الرسالة و أكمل الدين قبل وفاة النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم و كذلك فتأييد الله تعالى لنبيه لم ينقطع عنه حتى وفاته صلى الله عليه وسلم.
ذلك مبلغهم من العلم
They project too much. And too many on payroll.
تفسير رائع
بارك الله فيكم
والحمدلله على نعمة الإسلام
@@tunamohamed3307 و فيكم بارك الله
Another point is that this is an instant punishment had the prophet lied
The lie would be followed by instant death as a punishment
The prophet died a natural death of senile age after he delivered the whole message
It's not even that the translation literally says "HAD HE" meaning he didn't. Not to mention the prophet continue to live afterwards. The whole argument is comedic but idiotic... Lmao
I remember hearing this argument some years ago, and it caused me some doubts. Alhamdulillah i came across Bassams article and it all made sense.
Akhi can you give his link or any.
...wait..so he believes that the Qur'aan is a revelation from God? That's what it looks like because he uses it as proof against the Prophet peace be upon Him. How would God send a prophet who lies? What's the point of sending a liar to deliver a message?
But, if he believes that Muhammad peace be upon Him wrote the Qur'aan, how can the Prophet incriminate himself so blatantly, and how can he predict his own cause of death so precisely (according to what he claims was the cause of the death)?!
exactly my thought process. The whole argument is so stupid lol.
@@Abusteif1 Masha'Allah!
JazakaAllah Khair..
بارك الله فيك وجزاك الله خير الجزاء أخي دانيال.
Calm down BRAAA whats up BRAAAA hahahaha i am dead
First of all does anyone know of any poison, a natural poison considering this is the desert of Arabia which has a catalogue of poisonous plants, that has such an extreme physical effect that it severs, again "severs" as in cutting in half, the aorta?
Even if the translation was correct and both meant aorta:
Let's take a language lesson do they realize the difference between these two phrases:
"I ((feel)) my aorta is being c-ut from that po-ison"
"I feel like my leg is c-ut off from the nu-mbness"
And
"We would have cu-t from him the aorta"
"We would have to c-ut off his leg in su-rgery from the car acci-d-ent"
No still didn't cli-ck maybe they should get ba-ck to school then. Plus do they realize if the aorta is cu-t off how quick dea-th would be maybe other than language lessons go retake biology classes.
Plus another person who was infl-icted with the poi-son di-ed immediatly while the Prophet PBUH didn't and managed to sur-vive for years until finishing his message so their narrative again sha-tters.
This why it's vital to think for yourself, research and not copy paste from david wood, sam, christain prince, etc
What baffles me is that they don't even pick up their bible or at least finished reading past ch 1 of their scripture yet want to argue about Islam and preach.
And they believe in a CORE doctrine the trinity that they neither understand nor can explain but want to talk about logic, maybe they should read their bible first as in 1 corinthians 14:33 "God is not the author of confusion"
@@OAW-LetusDiscuss. These Christian Islamophobes, man. They have the comprehension level of a 4-year-old.
One came to me saying "The Quran states that the sun sets in a muddy spring" as if it is some scientific error, and I said to them, ”In your bible, a woman is being clothed with the sun and wears a crown with twelve stars on her head" and he became quiet.
No. He is just grasping at straws. LOL
This argument was popularised by David Wood and older than his rеtаrded kids.
Leave his kids out of it. But yes, you are right.
Brother don't step down on his level, let his kids out of this
@@Notreallyhereanymore he could be referencing at dw's followers as "retarded kids", but idk what the intention of the original commenter was
What is meaning of BAS✝️ARD ??
Do not insult kids with disabilities. If they are “retarded” then the pen is lifted from them. Also, many believers have kids with disabilities. Use better criticism that doesn’t show abhorrent insensitive character
Jazakillahu khairan brother Daniel for your logical response to these scumbags 😅
Daniel l love you man
Thanks for mentioning that interesting website.just to add: we can read the text as saying, that the prophet would be seized by his right hand(he’d have his right hand seized) and he didn’t + if he had his aorta cut, then he’d just pass away directly, without having the time to say that I’m abt to pass away
He is the most prominent ignorant! Thanks Daniel!
JazakAllah'u khairan brother
Alhumdulillah summa Alhumdulillah I was so relieved that brother gave him a authentic and logical answer!
1500 years and nobody can find a single error or contradiction.
Dang.. he embarrassed himself.. life time recovery brow.. 😂
So one hand he wants to prove that the Prophet Salla Allahu alaihi wa sallam is lying ma'adha Allah, which basically him saying that the Quran is not the truth from Allah, and then using a verse from the revelation that is false (according to him) to prove his point.. how lame!
yesss this is what gets me 😂
The ending 🤣🤣🤣🤣
He claimed that the verse in the Quran wouldn’t be meant in a literal sense. And that’s a dishonest presumption and very common for the people of innovation (either from the Muslims or all Christians and Jews).
The Arabic language is taken in a liters sense except there are indications in earlier Arabic sources that an expression is not to be taken literally or could be taken metaphorically. But the standard position is to take the statement literally.
Maybe bring Bassam Zawadi one day to your show? I'm subbed to his newsletter.
1. Allah has commanded the Prophet ﷺ to convey the message and Allah promised to protect him in doing so i.e until it's completion. "O Messenger, announce that which has been revealed to you from your Lord, and if you do not, then you have not conveyed His message. And Allāh will protect you from the people. Indeed, Allāh does not guide the disbelieving people." (5:67)
2. Allah indeed saved the Prophet from dying before the completion of Islam. While Al-Barra R.A died immediately after being poisoned at the same time. The poison normally should've cut the "al-wateen" (immediate death) not "al-abhar" which mean it was not affected as it should which also directly destroy the argument.
3. The prophet ﷺ did not die before the completion of Quran. Therefore, the "aorta" argument is baseless.
In conclusion, fear Allah. The Quran is a true reminder. Those who are disbelief will be in hellfire. May Allah guide us and have mercy upon us to be entered His paradise without reckoning.
Brother Daniel may Allah bless u even more
I have studied Arabic for 8 years and English for 14 years.
I would like to mention that most of the translations aren't accurate.
Most of them are because of the fact that there aren't many words in English that conveys the full meaning of the words in Arabic.
But...a few of them are because of the interpreters themselves who use the wrong words and there are other words which are better to use.
First of all, there is inherent negation in the ayahs he is mentioning. It's like "If you had stolen the money I would have punished you". This means subject didn't stole the money. Secondly, ayahs are revealed in Makkah, Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) was poisoned in 7th years after the hijra during battle of Khyaber and Allah punished Prophet Muhammad 3 years after that. What a logic!
I am a Bengali. So, we have this word 'যন্ত্রপাতি' (Jontropati) which we use for both Heavy Machineries and Light Tools (Like Hammer and such).
Thing is, Heavy machineries and Tools are very different things, yet, we use the same word. It's not weird. This is a such case. The English language didn't have that word, so both are expressed as aorta. Very simple.
I am saying this because christians will probably get frustrated at this point and say something like, "you moslems are making excuses!". No matter how much you cope, a valid explanation is a valid explanation.
Without lies Christianity dies
‘Guy with perfect eyebrows’…😂 love it when Daniel throws in some wit as a side dish.
Which poison specifically affects the aorta?
Didn't you hear? It's an expression of death coming close at hand.
It's like saying (in English) I feel my heart being ripped out or I can't breath when people are close to death.
i like how relaxed u ar. turning what, to me, is a bitter argument to counter, into something comedic and fun. Masha'Allah
4:20 i lost it there 🤣🤣💔💔
I previously talked about this subject with JW, referencing the same Surah and Hadith in a discussion ten years back. This method is utilized for people who are not adept in reading the Quran or lack expertise in both Arabic and English. While it's simple for bilingual individuals, it might pose challenges for those with less mastery in multiple languages.
I feel like that was his first time ever reading the word aorta because what was that pronunciation 😭
one would only have to ask who delivered that very revelation to immediately figure out the irrelevance of this stupid question.
Mashallah brother.
Another way to look at it is . If you believe Allah promise in the Quran to bunish the prophet Muhammad if he told lies in the name of Allah. And then saying according to the hadeth that the prophet died as in the way of punishment as in the Quran. Doesn't that mean that the Quran said the Truth. And as such if the Quran is true then the prophet Muhammad wasn't a false prophet.
Daniel, you are savage. Brooo Brow😂
السَّلاَمُ عَلَيْكُمْ وَرَحْمَةُ اللهِ وَبَرَكَاتُهُ
Assalamu’alaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuh
david wood used the exact same arguement ages ago
And Brother Farid Response already Responded it's Aurgment 😅😅
In a glance I can easily see that aorta has been written over something using a text editor 😂😂
This will be a bit technical but, the first thing that debunk this argument is you cannot base a mutawatir narration which is Quran, on ahad (all the narrations other than mutawatir) narration, which is aformentioned hadith in the video😂. These guys know nothing about Arabic or Quran or hadiths but they really think that they are debunking the whole religion with just these ignorant arguments🤣😂😭. What an arrogance!
Whenever you hear the words "I challenge any Muslim to answer..." it is an immediate pavlovian reaction moment where you roll your eyes/shake your head and inevitably wait for the slap on the forehead moment about to come. A'Sabr ya rab.
i challenge any muslim to find out what happend to his eye brows hahhaahahahahaha
Caterpillar djinn
This argument was made by hammer time and 'Farid responds' debunked it years ago
Good Job Brother
SubhaanALLah....
I can't believe how desperate some Christians are with there stupidity in trying to disprove what's always Right, i think that's why they all end up disgracing themselves.
I pray to God to open your heart so that you all can see Light
Please do a debate against sam shamoun. that dude brings up similar idiotic arguments but no one is catching him.
Sam always runs away from debates
Sam ran away from their debate its well documented by modern day debates
Yes he really needs to. And no he doesnt run from debates, he literally debated hamzas den and hamza ran away.
He challenged sam, sam didn't accept so enough with the "you should debate sam"
daniel haqiqatjou made community post three times directly asking for sam shamoun to have a debate.
and sam ran away.
I never understand why this people exist as if we stole their land,houses,ethnicity and... oops that already been done by certain people that claim that they are the chosen people.
GUYS GUYS GUYS HE DEBUNKED ISLAM LOOOOLLLLLLLL
such high IQ argument 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Moreover the word used in Qur'an is in past tense .. meaning if that was the case it we would have surely done that... Not will do this in the end
Christians come up with the most childish amateur arguments to troll Islam challenge: IMPOSSIBLE.
JazakaLahu khayr ya akhii faadil.
Please, Ustath Daniel, more refuting, less mocking of physical appearance. It's a bad influence on your viewers and I've always seen commenters who go out of their way to ridicule somebody's look or way of speech.
Barakallahu fiik brother Daniel.... Proud of you my brother ❤
why do these christians hide in a direct confrontation?
-doglogic got annihilated by uthman on a wrong interpretation of corinthians verse after his master sam shamoun ran away from sheikh uthman. and eventually he was so embarrased from this interpretation that he brang up the consciousness argument to cover up his doglogic embarrasment.
-sam shamoun acts tough online and even when some muslim agree to have a debate, he posts lies that "i destroyed a muslim" like heck he did nothing.
he did the same with you and he eventually became quiet after you embarrassed him the 3rd time by pinging him to have a debate.
daniel knows how to cook, god bless with that ending hahah
Watin is carotid, abhar is aorta
Woah I just checked. الؤتين and الأبهر link to the same wikipedia page in arabic. It's a vein. It literally says التحويل من الوتين الأبهر.
To every non-Muslim who feels they have an amazing argument that totally debunks islam in its entirety.
A Islamic scholar from the Middle Ages probably wrote a detailed refutation of it a long time ago. Peace
Why would god only reveal his word in Arabic? Why can only Arabs know the true word? Why wouldn’t he reveal it in each language?
@@ATB10129 why would God only reveal the torah in Hebrew? Can God only understand hewbrew? Your argument back fires onto you
@@Notreallyhereanymore no the argument doesn’t backfire because that’s a good question too. in every religion there is only a revelation in one specific part of the world… if these things ACTUALLY happened then clearly god is choosing favourites…
@@ATB10129 what you just said can be applied to what you said. The quran is in Arabic because it was revealed to Arabs.
@@ATB10129 what you just said can be applied to what you said. The quran is in Arabic because it was revealed to Arabs.
"obviously not in a literal sense"
Where does he get the idea from that that is not literal?
I think because in christianity they choose and pick what is metaphorical and what not that they also think this applies to the quran?
A christian talks about logical 😮!!!
Already Responded by Brother Farid Response Alhhamdullilah 👍🇸🇩
So he accepts the Quran as an authority or what?
if he read well and was interested in understanding the Koran as well as his interest in his beautician, we would have heard nonsense
Jazakallah khair brother Daniyal 😂
I think it's a little too much to attack his appearance, it's not like he's being derogatory, he's just pointing something out as a disbeliever. I think the condescending comments are uncalled for. Allahu Alam
We don’t know his intentions. However, as Muslims, we are very sensitive about our prophet Muhammad PBUH.
@@sye90812 Yeah intentions are one thing but as Muslims we are supposed to advise eachother on our poor behavior, I totally agree with standing up for our Prophets and Islam but we should do it in a way that befits us.
@@nivington Agreed
People be saying "I'm not attacking your religion" yet tone and sentence said otherwise. I can't belive it's so predictable with so many people😅
Brother Daniel You don't need to make fun of his appearance to refute his argument his argument based on ignorant of the Arabic language
In the field of rhetoric:
The phrase "لأخذنا منه بالوتين" (We would have seized him by the right) in the context of Arabic rhetoric uses the "ل" followed by "ب" (لام followed by باء) to imply immediate action. It suggests that God would have punished him instantly, right then and there, which contradicts the false claim that Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) lived for years after the revelation of this verse and then passed away. The meaning here is that if the Prophet had falsely attributed something to God, He would have swiftly inflicted His punishment. The phrase "لأخذنا باليمين" (We would have seized him by the right hand) implies seizing with power and force and punishment . But where in history do we find that ALLAH seized the Prophet with power and force? Where is this punishment?
Secondly, regarding the aorta and the wateen:
They are not the same word. According to "Al-Mu'jam Al-Waseet" (2/1010), the aorta (الابهر) is a vein, while the wateen (الوتين) is the main artery that exits the heart and supplies blood to the body. This distinction itself is a scientific miracle in the Quran and Sunnah. How could the illiterate Prophet, who could neither read nor write, know the difference between an artery and a vein? and we know in medicine the cut in the artery will kill fastly than the vein choosing the word alwateen is an indicator of a scientific miracle in fact This clearly indicates that these words are not from Muhammad but from God, proving the authenticity of the Quran and that it is indeed from the All-Knowing, the Wise.
Thirdly, the incident of the poisoned sheep:
When Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) ate the poisoned meat, a companion, Bishr ibn al-Baraa, ate with him and died immediately. Why didn't Muhammad die along with him?
Lastly, in Arabic language usage:
The phrase "انقطع ابهري" (My aorta has been cut) is a metaphorical expression meaning "I feel that I am going to die." It does not necessarily imply the literal meaning. The evidence for this can be found in the poetry of King Ibn Idris, where he says: "ويكاد من يرقي اليه مره يشكو انقطاع الابهر" (And one who ascends to him once almost complains of the severance of the aorta), implying imminent death.
Just got my first debit card, so knew I had to come here
BrOooO 😂😂
Btw the term that is used for "cut" is also different
Let me wrap up this real quick:
- The surah from which the christian apologist quoted that verse was revealed around 5 BH (before hijra).
- the words used in the surah, for anyone who understands the ways of Arabic, mean that the execution of that punishment would have been quick and swift. Because as you cut that major vein, the animal dies immediately.
- now the prophet upon whom be peace ate that poison from that woman 3 years before his death.
- between those two times, ie between the revelation of surat Al Haqq'a and the poison incident, most of the Quran was revealed with the most dense verses of legislation. So the probability for lying would have been highest during that time.
- the prophet upon whom be peace, by saying that, he just disproves the whole point, because if he was a liar, why would he mention that?
- the best thing these apologists can argue against is that the prophet WAS a true prophet but then changed. But the only fact that he survived with that poison for three years and some of his companions died then and there proves that the verse didn't apply to him, because again the verse was talking about an immediate swift death, similar to severing the aorta.
Other points I may have missed. But that's the general gist of it.
who would ever take someone like him seriously! people these days.
That mimicking got me 😂😂😂😂
Excellent response BRO 😅😅😅😅
بارك الله فيك و جزاك خير الدنيا و الآخرة اللهم آمين يارب العالمين
The fault is unfortunatly from the translator plus the verse speaks about the past not about the future