for all the people saying this and that, it's a su-27 with no thrust vectoring. you can watch the rear of the aircraft the engines to not point in any direction it is merely a yaw/ rudder input at stalling speeds to rudder kick the hyper maneuverable aircraft into a roll/vertical flat spin sort of thing.
This is Kvochur’s Bell not a cobra or super pirouette or a falling leaf. If y’all would just look stuff you’d know but glad so many people are appreciative of this movie.
All I gotta say what a piece of machinery. We’re living in one of the greatest times for many things cool to see what man can create and do with what we make
Surprised the engines don't stall while its doing that. Only way it would work is while they are doing the Maneuver they would have to pull the throttle all the way down so the engines don't need near as much air.
@@LOOTLLAMA7708 Well yeah, engines staling means that the engines basically stop working, in this case due to lack of air flow to them but could be a different reason for it.
Basically none because G force is based on speed and acceleration. To do this maneuver the plane has to go so slow it basically is stalling (as you can see by the hight angle of attack at the end) , which is why the G forces are lower than you would expect. Same thing actually counts for those thrust vectored 5th gen planes, their turning circle is stupid small but done at such low speed it doesn't produce much force Hope that helped
I don’t think that this is a su27. Sure yes the su27 is capable of performing a lot of cool aerobatics, but a move like this would require some kind of thrust vectoring especially in the spin part. So I think that this this a su35 which looks almost identical to the 27 except the 35 has thrust vectoring
i agree completely, im quite sure this is indeed a su35. u can see that it is in fact redirecting its exhaust nozzles at around 0:07 and both aircraft look identical
@@nonovernol3523 Nah it don't You can see the engine nozzles being completely straight and not turning anywhere, unlike what you would see on actual thrust vectored Flankers
I don't understand how it defeats the missile in Top Gun Maverick. I also don't understand how the pilot is going to resume fighting with no airspeed. The F-14 can just come around fast and blast him before he can get moving again.
“Holy Shit! What the fuck was that?”
-Rooster
"What the f-?"
That's the kvuchur bell maneuver.u noob.
He’s doing that thrust vectoring bullshit again.
@@erfguuipo8084 he's quoting Top Gun Rooster you noob
A moment of silence for all those who still call this the cobra maneuver
I know that wasn't the Cobra maneuver
mmmmmmm yummy
pov: you saw a video of a guy calling it "the rolling cobra"
Lmao
congrats 200 likes
POV: you just learned the name of this maneuver pulled in Top Gun Maverick and wanted to see if it exists
>_<
Why you little...!
Knew it existed (as the Cobra anyway, which isn't quite the same) and just wanted to see it IRL
@@josephastier7421 i mean it was done irl in the movie lol
*pause for a moment*
....listen here you little sh!_
@@theextremeanimator4721 wtf bro
for all the people saying this and that, it's a su-27 with no thrust vectoring. you can watch the rear of the aircraft the engines to not point in any direction it is merely a yaw/ rudder input at stalling speeds to rudder kick the hyper maneuverable aircraft into a roll/vertical flat spin sort of thing.
read the title
Yeah, maybe that's not the Su-30SM
And named after the Russian Test Pilot, Anatoly Kvochur. You may know him from his famous Mig 29 crash at the Paris airshow
What you talkin bout that’s a su 35
@@faceplant755 no because a su-35 has canards
So this is what I saw in Top Gun Maverick
yep, it indeed is
yep
Yes but with the SU-57
This is Kvochur’s Bell not a cobra or super pirouette or a falling leaf. If y’all would just look stuff you’d know but glad so many people are appreciative of this movie.
It literally says kvochurs bell in the titile, who are you yelling at?
kvochur bell is a different tailslide manouver where the plane moves like a bell pendulum which you would know if you actually looked stuff up
@@miguelvids9531the idiots in this video:
ruclips.net/video/kFt2HAp7fHo/видео.html&feature=shares
what @@enpilarlapaz1494
Ah ! The "fck you physics" Manoeuvre !
Why do you say it goes against physics?
If I could show a medieval peasant anything, it would be this clip right here
War is bad but planes are rad
Or an Apache helicopter
Probably the most badass thing iv seen another man do, absolute admiration 😧
The Su-57 pulled the same maneuver in Top Gun: Maverick :)
It's Su-35, first prototype, Bort 901 - easily recognized by distinctive "mustard" camo.
Russia does have its moments.
Maveric attacks Iran in the movie
USSR plane though. Everything good about Russia is just leftovers from when they were competent. Still a kick ass maneuver though!
@@LordStaszko no shit Sherlock.
@@HydratedBeans that really is a laughable perspective to take
Yeah, modern 5 gens (and, apparently, Su-27s too) do not fly. They move in the air however they want.
Its crazy how they just turn however the fuck they want
I can hear Rooster saying “wtf was that”
Jane's ATF GOLD. I remember seeing this clip on the CD-ROM back in 1997.
All I gotta say what a piece of machinery. We’re living in one of the greatest times for many things cool to see what man can create and do with what we make
Tom Cruise brought me here!
Hold my vodka...
Anatoly Kvochur RIP ✝️
The fact it can do that WITHOUT Thrust Vectoring is crazy.
Exactly what I was looking for thank you
Top Gun bring me here. That K Bell skill is really impressive. Shout out to Russian pilot
RIP Anatoly Kvochur
I was thinking "that's the co-OH SHIT!"
Brilliant Kvochur Bell maneuver!
cześć jego pamięci , człowiek który łamał bariery fizyki [RIP]
Surprised the engines don't stall while its doing that. Only way it would work is while they are doing the Maneuver they would have to pull the throttle all the way down so the engines don't need near as much air.
They do, the whole maneuver is based off of a stall. They purposely stall the plane to be able to do that.
the plane does stall when it does that
Guys he literally said engines stall, not plane stall.
reading comprehension-train it
@@Tacticaviator7 there's a difference?
@@LOOTLLAMA7708 Well yeah, engines staling means that the engines basically stop working, in this case due to lack of air flow to them but could be a different reason for it.
"What the- holy shit! What the fuck was that?"
“What the fuck was that?”
Fantastic capture! May I feature this maneuver in my next video? Of course I'll provide a link back to your original video. All the best to you!
Its flankin' time.
this maneuver makes an appearance 8n Top Gun: Maverick
I think it's su 35 but still cool
It actually exists.
It's called the holy-shit-what-the-f***-was-that maneuver.
WAS THAT THE KVOCHUR’S BELL MANUEVER
5th gen fighter by me
what airport
Imagine the g’s
The guy just plays Ace Combat in real life.
I wonder how many g’s that produced
Basically none because G force is based on speed and acceleration. To do this maneuver the plane has to go so slow it basically is stalling (as you can see by the hight angle of attack at the end) , which is why the G forces are lower than you would expect.
Same thing actually counts for those thrust vectored 5th gen planes, their turning circle is stupid small but done at such low speed it doesn't produce much force
Hope that helped
Su-27s can't pull that many gs, max around 7-8
Can I do this with my su25t in dcs?
Most likely No
You can try anything at least once
Yes, but only when it's missing a wing.
you'll end up recreating the aeroflot flight 593. (exaggeration)
you can *try*
Its a Su-35S Super Flanker-E
Oh my
How this maneuver helps in dogfight ??
It doesn't
Evade non heat seeking missile maybe
wait it actually did that
Wrong title. This is Su-35 instead of Su-27. Su-27 can't do this because it does not have thrust vectoring.
Actually you are both mistaken, this is actually the SU-30 variant mate 😊
@@user-ee3tu3zw2r no your wrong the its su 35 the su 30 has canards the su 30 doesn't
@@leschroder7773 open up mate, it got tandem seater, and not all su30 variant has canard. Come gere to russia so i can show you
@@user-ee3tu3zw2r Bro, i'm surprised you live in Russia but you dont know that the aircraft in the video is a Su-35BM bort number 901
@@user-ee3tu3zw2r the su 30 has two seats😂😂
WHAT THE?!
Nice 👍🎉😂
Just disable gravity
So does it any effect in real combat?
Not really, but it does show the super manueverability of the su 27 if that is what a countries military desires.
I don’t think that this is a su27. Sure yes the su27 is capable of performing a lot of cool aerobatics, but a move like this would require some kind of thrust vectoring especially in the spin part. So I think that this this a su35 which looks almost identical to the 27 except the 35 has thrust vectoring
i agree completely, im quite sure this is indeed a su35. u can see that it is in fact redirecting its exhaust nozzles at around 0:07 and both aircraft look identical
Indeed, it is Su-35.
So it’s cobra and then a yaw
not exactly a cobra
Cobra a bit and then yaw your vectoring thrust boom this manuever happens
@@CRBALLIN7SUII your talking about the thrust vectoring bullshit?
Who cares. Its a cool maneuver and thats what really matters.
Pretty much
Lets be honest, if someone did this to you in a dogfight, you may as well just eject and applaud cos you aint winning
what the...
But it su-35
This is a Su-35 not a Su-27..
It's SU-27 do not argue with me I am Russian and I know what I'm talking about. This video is 18 years old . Le Burge air show performance
@@7777777fresh there’s no little tube on the nose. It’s the SU-35
Su-35* no Su-27
Thrust vectoring witchcraft
Yes the SU-27 does have a Thrust Vectoring the 30s have it so that SU-27 pilot is very good
@@HiruBieel it does..
@@nonovernol3523 oh it does have sorry...
@@HiruBieel its fine everyone makes mistakes
@@nonovernol3523 Nah it don't
You can see the engine nozzles being completely straight and not turning anywhere, unlike what you would see on actual thrust vectored Flankers
thats a mig 29
Су 35
The manuver you see in top gun maverick is a cobra spin
No, the Cobra Spin rotates along the y-axis during the 1/4 loop. The Kvochur Bell rotates along the x-axis.
What the fuck was that?!
not a cobra at all
🫡
Pretty impressive as a performance, pretty useless as a combat maneuver 🤷
Top gun Maverick proved you wrong
@@joshnopueto8205 no it was a wonderful performance one of the best movies ever
I don't understand how it defeats the missile in Top Gun Maverick. I also don't understand how the pilot is going to resume fighting with no airspeed. The F-14 can just come around fast and blast him before he can get moving again.
Good for missile evasion if done correctly
@@josephastier7421 engines are powerful and like the f22 it kind of floats like a leaf in the wind
blud think he in top gun
it has absolutely nothing to do with the bell maneuver