Going Through the Text of the New Testament by Bruce Metzger

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 июн 2022
  • I go thru the Text of the NT by late Prof. Bruce Metzger

Комментарии • 28

  • @2dar2
    @2dar2 2 месяца назад

    thanks brother

  • @dadanmart760
    @dadanmart760 4 дня назад

    In 49:00 how do we know the earliest manuscriot of new testament preserve the original.scribd or the autograph since they didnt survive. My question is is there any example of any faith or beleif system from ancient era which the original scribd or the autograph text still fully preserved
    Secondly do we need to study ancient mamuscripts if their original text were still preserved in the first place?

  • @AbuUbaida89
    @AbuUbaida89 2 года назад

    Watching the video rn

  • @esquire9445
    @esquire9445 Год назад

    At 59:00 you start talking about Jesus had different emotions based on which Bible translation. What verses are you specifically talking about?I tried looking it up and only found indignant and compassion… what version has angry?

  • @cls7271
    @cls7271 Год назад

    I wonder whether you purchased your copy? I can't seem to find the 4th ed for sale.

    • @historytheology
      @historytheology  Год назад

      Yes, I bought it from Bookdepository at $108 Australian dollars

    • @cls7271
      @cls7271 Год назад

      @@historytheology thanks!

  • @ermiaszewduyehuala3020
    @ermiaszewduyehuala3020 2 года назад

    Hey man, are you student of christian Theology? and how do you find it if you are? and why you start to study it?

    • @historytheology
      @historytheology  2 года назад +1

      Hi I like to research about ancient history and religion and not just focusing on Christianity. I am a student of comparative religion

  • @hassanmirza2392
    @hassanmirza2392 9 месяцев назад

    Does Metzger talk about Orthodox Corruption of Scriptures?

    • @historytheology
      @historytheology  9 месяцев назад +1

      Yes. has a section on intentional changes. But didn’t go into a lengthy discussion.

    • @hassanmirza2392
      @hassanmirza2392 9 месяцев назад

      @@historytheology
      Akhi, another thing. The Jewish Study Bible is for Reform/Conservative Jews, just like New Oxford Study Bible is for Mainline Protestant Christians. But JPS is not for Orthodox Jews. So, I searched for some Orthodox Jewish Tanakh. The Steinsaltz Tanakh is a three volume Orthodox Jewish Study Bible. Maybe useful for you. I might buy it if they publish a single volume edition.

    • @historytheology
      @historytheology  9 месяцев назад +1

      @@hassanmirza2392 thank you for your survey and letting me know. The artscroll is more jewish than the jps. But the JPS is a critical edition. I prefer to look at critical editions than devotional ones. Which is why I’ve not looked into the artscroll. But someday I want to. So thank you your information

    • @hassanmirza2392
      @hassanmirza2392 9 месяцев назад

      Many Jews/Christians are non-practicing. But I think half of all practicing Jews and Christians are quite liberal now, so they do accept liberal-critical Bibles and commentaries (NRSV, JPS, Oxford and HarperCollins). But the other half is quite conservative like Muslims. I think most of Muslims do not accept any liberal teachings of Islam, thankfully.

    • @hassanmirza2392
      @hassanmirza2392 9 месяцев назад

      @@historytheology
      ArtScroll is ultra-conservative, their notes are very skewed. Koren/Steinsaltz is similar to ESV/NIV (Study) Bibles and is moderate-conservative. While NRSV/JPS is for liberal Christians/Jews.

  • @ermiaszewduyehuala3020
    @ermiaszewduyehuala3020 2 года назад

    kindly could you please read this book and make review video as you did bruce metzger; "The Gentle Answer to the Muslim Accusation of Biblical Falsification".....By Gordon D Nickel

    • @historytheology
      @historytheology  2 года назад

      I will look it up. Thanks for the suggestion

  • @AbuUbaida89
    @AbuUbaida89 2 года назад

    Have you read myths and mistakes in the new testament textual criticism?

    • @historytheology
      @historytheology  2 года назад +2

      I have not read in full but the very Introduction by Dan Wallace threw me away. Especially his early statement that even the worst Greek manuscripts contain enough of the Gospels…I found this to be a dishonest claim. And he definitely knew better. We do not have the complete Mark until Sinaiticus (350-75 CE), so if this is what he call the worst Greek MU, then the worst G-MU is also our best MU. So what is he talking about? It does not gel with lots of other scholarship materials out there.

    • @azmanhassan1804
      @azmanhassan1804 2 года назад

      Brother, are you from Indonesia

    • @historytheology
      @historytheology  2 года назад +1

      @@azmanhassan1804 no brother. I am from Singapore 🇸🇬

    • @azmanhassan1804
      @azmanhassan1804 2 года назад

      @@historytheology I am Dr Azman Hassan, from Johor Malaysia. I hope we can meet. I have read Prof Ehrman’s book

    • @historytheology
      @historytheology  2 года назад

      @@azmanhassan1804 Salam Dr. I am open to discussing on Ehrman’s work. We can have it via zoom or RUclips live