At one point rank 6's were hard to make sure. Every good generic ED card will get banned eventually because it's designed for a format that won't exist in 5 years.
Calamity isn’t the problem it’s crimson dragon , every deck calamity is in crimson dragon is there. If crimson isn’t in the deck calamity isn’t either same situation as puppet lock
For Accesscode you can just make it require Cyberse monsters and make it so that you can react to its effects. Basically make it the same as its Anime counterpart.
The same could be done for pretty much every generic extra deck monster like how Goyo Guardian was changed to require an earth tuner thus limiting it's ability to be spammed.
Thoughts on making Beatrice require 3 Level 6 monsters? That should shut most decks from summoning her without major commitment while still letting BA use her normally without the major text change.
Appo, I:P, S:P, and Accesscode and prob Beatrice needs a errata to their Summoning Conditions. As for Nightmare, it just needs to have the same lock as Bloody Doll and Fiendish Knight.
Beatrice allows dumb essential turn skips and locks like transaction rollback copying the mayakashi trap to prevent specs from hand deck and extra deck during opps turn and only requires 1/2 cards to pull off
@@satyayana1399 Nah , pendulum has been limited so much by master rule. Also -2 mechanics by scaling in first or second hand and restricted the spell/trap zone literally worsened the pendulum. Imagine without link monster , pendulum still rouge or less than that at best without any complicated combo or floaters
Sometimes, you just want to strap on a helmet and play caveman yugioh. I think, especially for new players, lower skill ceiling decks should be competitive. A person shouldn't have to dedicate so much time to learning combo lines if they just want to go to a local or regional event. There really needs to be a structural change to yugioh where combo decks are inherently less competitive, where removal is more competitive than negates, where follow up is more determinant of a decks success than the ability to vomit out an end board. If you knew every turn you would get shiftered, wouldn't you take a different deck to a tournament? The issue with floodgates is they are too inconsistent.
I agree with all of these. If they did want to errata access code they could change its (and transcode) materials to code talker or cyberse monsters. They could also keep masquerena and little knight around by making their materials include an s force monster to fit with lore
I wouldn't be so sure about the dimension shifter being banned. I see dimension shifter as a sudo Maxx C in the TCG that only tier 2 decks can play to compete with tier 1 decks.
Acesscode is Litteraly most fair generic boss lmao. If you gonna push link 4 to boss whose only perk is potentially high attack and destruction based removal, you already earned that ability... Even his effect is pricy... Keep the guy by all means.
@@THELORDVODKA It's arguably a bit too easy to make for what it does. The effect isn't that pricey when you're closing out the game with it and the fact most Decks only need 1 or 2 removals with Accesscode to seal the game which is easy for most Decks to facilitate.
I agree with every card in this video especially Accesscode Talker. Whenever it hits the field you basically lose on the spot unless you happen to be using cards that benefit you by being destroyed or if you use something like Battle Fader or Swift Scarecrow to stop their battle phase.
Imperm stops it, mirrorjade stops it, droplet stops it, veiler stops it,I:p into S:p stops it, do I need to continue? He's the least of our problems and is actually a good going 2nd card in a format where everyone is FTK-ing
so many archetypal boss monsters being better outside their own archetype is something I've heard way too much ever since I started playing Ygo lmao. Idk if its intentional from konami or they're clueless when designing their cards
Knightmare Unicorn also exists and can be made for the same amount of materials as SP if summoning it through IP's effect. There's also Underworld Goddess but she needs more investment to make due to needing 4 materials minimum.
Beatrice needs a ban. Accesscode is the final main character card in vrains so its supposed to be op. Skill drain should never be banned for the sake of beatdown with goblin attack force amd Malefic.
must ban : too easily accessible turn skip, as the Albion white fusion because of shits as Pupper Lock or Ra disciple, Dim barrier or Shifter that just destroy many decks and Apollousa (same reasons as Salvage and Baronne annoying too strong generic negate that begin with high stats) Acces, I agree it's dumb to me that a generic monster with just 2 links in grave can be a 4300 beater that pop 2 cards AND cannot be respond to.
I play harpies even before the trap cane out and I've alleays said that the trap is broke but its the only way to play the deck since they banned simorg, i hope for a real boss monster if they decide to ban it because other decks are playing it
@@blackview1285 even if it wasnt is really insane and probably shouldn't be in the game. All you need to make for it to be live its link 2 wind monsters into harpie conductor
Albion the sanctifire dragon definitely deserves to be banned. Branded is already difficult enough without it, but with it is honestly just a bigger headache.
Ah yes, ban Chalamity, that never saw competitive play until Crimson dragon, the most braindead synchro that says "Hey, remember all those difficult to summon bosses, like Quasar, Blazar, Chalamity?... Yeah, I'm gonna cheat them out". Crimson dragon allows the user to handrip the opponent (using bystial dis pater and omega), allows chalamity locking and setting up 1 extra omni negate monster... yeah, I think I know which card is actually the problem. If you get chalamity locked by an RDA player that's using branded etitude, I think that's just a you problem, since the deck loses to multiple handtraps, and thus we might aswell ban every single draw card, cause exodia players might draw exodia from their 3rd draw, or ban arcana force World.
So now we just want all generic extra deck cards banned but refuse to hit the actual teir 0 deck. This list is dumb. Snake eyes will just pivot to another broken strategy because it is very flexible.
It is a bit easy to close games out with it to be fair. So many games won with the 4.3 or 5.3k damage, easy removal and just 4300 ATK is enough to run over just about any relevant boss monster if needed. It probably is a bit too easy to make for how much it does.
I’ve never once played Tear, and Shifter is still cancer. Turning off a vital aspect of the game for free for TWO TURNS is ridiculous card design, especially since our only responses to it that aren’t bad (Called By and Gamma) are both limited.
Accesscode falls into the same category as other Generic Monsters that shouldn't be generic. Accesscode, All the Borrel Monsters, Baron, Halq, Verte, Electromite etc. None of these cards should be Generic and they all deserve to be banned or have an errata making them only usable in their archetypes or certain types of decks only (Cybers only, Dragon only, Warrior Only etc) Ip, Sp, and Apollousa just need to be banned in general. Way to generic and way to strong for how easy they are to put out. Tcgplayers aint ready for this convo tho cuz they 🤡
Lord stop saying sanctifier needs to be banned. Get rid of the floodgates. Jowgen, Dino, ido, the statues, Krystia and disciple. They should just go. They are only used for degenerate floodgate crap even beyond Sanctfier.
Lavalval Chain is Rank 4 though... Beatrice in theory has less Decks she's usable in but I think we're at the point she should go because the Bystial engine is pretty splashable and most of their monsters are Level 6.
Apple did nothing wrong and skill, drain is the best floodgate out of all the floodgates that is the most fair and it just annoys people because they really hate floodgate cards and the fact that skill drain nowadays is so uncompetitive viable that it make it more fair
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
I was once called insane for wanting beatrice banned because "rank6 are hard to make" I didn't even continue the argument xD
deadass people are npc sometimes I swear, I don't understand how the same argument can be recycled 10 years later
@@bloodarcher7841 Whats even the likelihood that Konami will do this before banning it?
At one point rank 6's were hard to make sure. Every good generic ED card will get banned eventually because it's designed for a format that won't exist in 5 years.
You shoulda walked of to the side and rang up the mental hospital telling them their patient escaped 😂
Sooooo are we finally gonna errata Beatrice now and be done with it?
Yacine do be spitting facts here.
💪💪💪
@@yacine656too stronk
Absolutely agree with that Beatrice errata. Would be a nice buff to BA too.
and I think it's well deserved for them as well
Calamity isn’t the problem it’s crimson dragon , every deck calamity is in crimson dragon is there. If crimson isn’t in the deck calamity isn’t either same situation as puppet lock
This one gets it
I’ve literally been saying the same exact thing, finally someone else says it.
They want accel synchro for lore reason, and our turn philosophy .
it'll took awhile for CD to swap place with calamity like how union carrier swap place with destruction sword as CD considerably new
But if you ban calamity crimson dragon isn‘t a problem anymore either🤷🏾♂️
For Accesscode you can just make it require Cyberse monsters and make it so that you can react to its effects.
Basically make it the same as its Anime counterpart.
The same could be done for pretty much every generic extra deck monster like how Goyo Guardian was changed to require an earth tuner thus limiting it's ability to be spammed.
Thoughts on making Beatrice require 3 Level 6 monsters? That should shut most decks from summoning her without major commitment while still letting BA use her normally without the major text change.
Appo, I:P, S:P, and Accesscode and prob Beatrice needs a errata to their Summoning Conditions.
As for Nightmare, it just needs to have the same lock as Bloody Doll and Fiendish Knight.
Beatrice allows dumb essential turn skips and locks like transaction rollback copying the mayakashi trap to prevent specs from hand deck and extra deck during opps turn and only requires 1/2 cards to pull off
So transaction rollback Is the real broken card?
@@buonvecchiocharlie7507 ehh it's debatable but we can only confirm it after Beatrice is banned
@@buonvecchiocharlie7507 nope. banning beatrice would also beneficial just in case another broken use of card in gy were to happen
I finally want the Ocg and Tcg to have the balls and CLEAN up the card pool of broken shiet!
agreed. we need a worldwide petition to merge the too and make all lists healthy
Basically Link monsters are the biggest mistake made by Konami
so does pendulum
@@satyayana1399 Nah , pendulum has been limited so much by master rule. Also -2 mechanics by scaling in first or second hand and restricted the spell/trap zone literally worsened the pendulum. Imagine without link monster , pendulum still rouge or less than that at best without any complicated combo or floaters
The problem is too many generic extra deck cards. Someone will always find a way to abuse them. Need bosses for their own archetypes
As someone who like salads, it’s almost insulting when other fire decks use Raging Phoenix 🤣
Sometimes, you just want to strap on a helmet and play caveman yugioh. I think, especially for new players, lower skill ceiling decks should be competitive.
A person shouldn't have to dedicate so much time to learning combo lines if they just want to go to a local or regional event.
There really needs to be a structural change to yugioh where combo decks are inherently less competitive, where removal is more competitive than negates, where follow up is more determinant of a decks success than the ability to vomit out an end board.
If you knew every turn you would get shiftered, wouldn't you take a different deck to a tournament? The issue with floodgates is they are too inconsistent.
Fiendsmith is secret and called Fiendsmith engraver
@KERINGAI-qx7yi It is odd. I would have expected a new fiendsmith main deck monster to have a name like that
I agree with all of these. If they did want to errata access code they could change its (and transcode) materials to code talker or cyberse monsters. They could also keep masquerena and little knight around by making their materials include an s force monster to fit with lore
I wouldn't be so sure about the dimension shifter being banned. I see dimension shifter as a sudo Maxx C in the TCG that only tier 2 decks can play to compete with tier 1 decks.
Good content man...keep up the good work.
Can u make a dragon link combo video featuring the new metalmorph support? Tnk u
yep that one is coming up real soon!!
Considering the little bit of card lore with little knight and masquerana, the two of them being on the ban radar is kinda funny.
I miss borrelsword tbh. Accesscode is stupid. Just limit its summoning conditions by requiring cyberse monsters as materials...
Why would you miss borrelsword omfg... you're part of the problem.
Acesscode is Litteraly most fair generic boss lmao. If you gonna push link 4 to boss whose only perk is potentially high attack and destruction based removal, you already earned that ability... Even his effect is pricy... Keep the guy by all means.
What’s accesscode when there is zealantis and raging pheonix combo 😂
@@THELORDVODKA It's arguably a bit too easy to make for what it does. The effect isn't that pricey when you're closing out the game with it and the fact most Decks only need 1 or 2 removals with Accesscode to seal the game which is easy for most Decks to facilitate.
@@Gatitasecsii The complaints would then shift to Borrelsword. People were complaining about it before Accesscode came out, right?
I would defend shifter from the ban until the graveyard stops being a second hand.
That’s how most decks have been playing for years tho 🥱
I agree with every card in this video especially Accesscode Talker. Whenever it hits the field you basically lose on the spot unless you happen to be using cards that benefit you by being destroyed or if you use something like Battle Fader or Swift Scarecrow to stop their battle phase.
Imperm stops it, mirrorjade stops it, droplet stops it, veiler stops it,I:p into S:p stops it, do I need to continue?
He's the least of our problems and is actually a good going 2nd card in a format where everyone is FTK-ing
so many archetypal boss monsters being better outside their own archetype is something I've heard way too much ever since I started playing Ygo lmao.
Idk if its intentional from konami or they're clueless when designing their cards
Literally all Ice Barrier synchro...
Omega
...
...
Rhongomynid
Should E hero Cosmos Neos get banned as well, since its basically a calamity but with an "If" instead of a "When"
only if cosmos neos can be splashed in many non hero deck
@@satyayana1399 true^
I would be fine with that beatrice errata since i could still use it in infernoid.
IP I see fair as a "generic" interruption thats need more bodies to something and extra deck space, SP it's the real cancer to the game
Knightmare Unicorn also exists and can be made for the same amount of materials as SP if summoning it through IP's effect. There's also Underworld Goddess but she needs more investment to make due to needing 4 materials minimum.
SPis fine it helps the player going 2nd. but IP to SP when you go 1st is just so much
What if we keep beatrice, but ban transaction rollback? 100% agree with sanctifire ban tho and I play branded
Shifter is balanced by the fact that you have to play a less competitive deck in order to use it
Tenpai Dragon :P
Beatrice should have had that eratta from day 1. It's so goofy how it's worded
Even if you ban gimmick puppet nightmare there’s a bunch of other floodgates to use like Archlord of Krystia
Ra deciple. Just errata sanctifire to negate the effects of monsters summoned to opps turn.
It's so hard for Konami to just make a good banlist thats both balanced and good for everyone.
They keep printing broken cards. That's the problem.
That argument for Beatrice will always be how I think curious should have been handled
Can we get pot of greed limit 1?
06:01 I mean then I can put all the handtraps on semi-limited as well
If chain gets unbanned white woods will be able to search skill drain every turn.
Banning Beatrice would be really nice, they'd probably just make Caesar instead, but I'd rather deal with Caeser than Beatrice any day of the week.
Why is nobody talking about sp? That card is just too freaking good
I wouldn’t mind if Accesscode gets banned. It would make Borrelsword or even Borreload Dragon more viable, until they print a new generic beatstick.
Okay but if we remove Acccesscode, Borrelsword will just do its job
Just delete Update Jammer
Who the hell plays update jammer besides rogue cyberse decks? Even salad isn't playing it anymore and it's the only relevant cyberse deck left.
What about the thunder dragon?! what do you think!
I would ban nemeses corridor
Colossus is fine
They knew feather storm would break any wind deck, idk why it isnt harpie exclusive
What has beatrice done that makes it ban worthy? what cards can it send to the graveyard from the deck that people are like “yup this is too broken”
Transaction rollback + shiranui trap = turn skip
Big fan of erratas the return cards to their archetypes.
Agree with every single card. Good job.
could you make a video about a virtual world? some lock combos with beatrice and rollback? and somw cool fusion combos with muddy mudragon
I mean I could but who else really wants virtual combos?
@@yacine656YES PLZ WE WANT VW
We can just swap some ideas if you want. I'm a VW player in tcg and I can show you the combo for locks :)
@@yacine656deck is really fun, im sure it will be watched enough
Beatrice needs a ban. Accesscode is the final main character card in vrains so its supposed to be op.
Skill drain should never be banned for the sake of beatdown with goblin attack force amd Malefic.
Ban ip and apo then they’ll make gryphon and unchained link2 into sp using the fiendsmith engine
must ban : too easily accessible turn skip, as the Albion white fusion because of shits as Pupper Lock or Ra disciple, Dim barrier or Shifter that just destroy many decks and Apollousa (same reasons as Salvage and Baronne annoying too strong generic negate that begin with high stats)
Acces, I agree it's dumb to me that a generic monster with just 2 links in grave can be a 4300 beater that pop 2 cards AND cannot be respond to.
I play harpies even before the trap cane out and I've alleays said that the trap is broke but its the only way to play the deck since they banned simorg, i hope for a real boss monster if they decide to ban it because other decks are playing it
the problem with it is its kinda generic. they shouldve made it with an archtype condition
@@blackview1285 even if it wasnt is really insane and probably shouldn't be in the game.
All you need to make for it to be live its link 2 wind monsters into harpie conductor
Nightmare lock won't work on Floow
Albion the sanctifire dragon definitely deserves to be banned. Branded is already difficult enough without it, but with it is honestly just a bigger headache.
I strongly agree with access code ban, maybe on appo, strongly disagree on I:P.
I think apollousa would be ok if it was given a hard once per turn or limit its attack points at 2400 or 1600.
I agree with this. Once per chain is pretty cracked even with the ATK point reduction.
A soft once per turn would be enough.
@@dudono1744 yeah, just once per chain is kinda busted.
I honestly think this a bad take. You could just errata appo, and Beatrice and Sanctifire isnt the problem. Gimmick Puppet is. Ban gimmick puppet
how is what I said a bad take if you pretty much agree with me at 99%?
Ah yes, ban Chalamity, that never saw competitive play until Crimson dragon, the most braindead synchro that says "Hey, remember all those difficult to summon bosses, like Quasar, Blazar, Chalamity?... Yeah, I'm gonna cheat them out". Crimson dragon allows the user to handrip the opponent (using bystial dis pater and omega), allows chalamity locking and setting up 1 extra omni negate monster... yeah, I think I know which card is actually the problem. If you get chalamity locked by an RDA player that's using branded etitude, I think that's just a you problem, since the deck loses to multiple handtraps, and thus we might aswell ban every single draw card, cause exodia players might draw exodia from their 3rd draw, or ban arcana force World.
So now we just want all generic extra deck cards banned but refuse to hit the actual teir 0 deck. This list is dumb. Snake eyes will just pivot to another broken strategy because it is very flexible.
Ban or limit Sangen Summoning & Unban True King 👏🏼
You forgot to mention flamberge
Right, that card just shat out bodies for Snake-Eyes turn after turn tbh, it needs to go.
I've noticed everytime Yacine talks about banning cards he dodges Snake Eye which is the actual problem. Get rid of Flamberge? Agreed.
Maybe he play snake eye in tournament and getting rid of things like pupet lock help him
Yes. Ban flamberge @@kpetro539
@@kpetro539 He talked about how he hate the format.
Is banning sanctifire a slap on the wrist for the deck?
yeah barely hurts despia, it's the correct hit but one can argue the floodgate monsters should be banned instead
I also wouldn't mind banning Abyss Dweller.
Banning Accesscode is crazy 😭😭😭
Speaking of potential erratas, I can fix Tearlaments Kitkallos with one word...
I wish Transaction Rollback and D Barrier were banned, good god I despise those
a card that should be limited is diabelstar, for a good reason.
Ya had me until access code…nah good in the hood he’s good in TCG
It is a bit easy to close games out with it to be fair. So many games won with the 4.3 or 5.3k damage, easy removal and just 4300 ATK is enough to run over just about any relevant boss monster if needed. It probably is a bit too easy to make for how much it does.
Leave shifter at 3 ban snake eyes ash put the blackwitch to 1 sinful spoils to 1 put bonfire to 1 just like the rest of the searchers.
yeah bonfire to 1 seems so obvious, especially considering their track record with the other search spells
When u gonna do master duel 😢
he said shifter is cancer says the tear lovers @!!!!!!!!
I’ve never once played Tear, and Shifter is still cancer. Turning off a vital aspect of the game for free for TWO TURNS is ridiculous card design, especially since our only responses to it that aren’t bad (Called By and Gamma) are both limited.
Just make it so you can only send burning abyss cards
Wait if shifter gets banned people whine about hand traps
I mean most competitive players dislike hand traps, but it's not what you think
@@yacine656 I guess it's because they allow stupid turn 1 win strats to exist.
Good Hits 👍🏻
You know tcg players are chad when they want to ban sanctifire instead of gimmick puppet nightmare. Cool!
i literally have an accesscode talker ultimate coming in the mail
hahahaha
Hoping we'll have a real and impactful banlist ! (*wink at ocg*)
fiendsmith is going to be full power at world unbelievable.
Acces code is fair tbh
Links are a mistake. Generic links are even worse.
It's probably a bit too easy for being able to do what Borrelsword did but arguably better.
Accesscode falls into the same category as other Generic Monsters that shouldn't be generic. Accesscode, All the Borrel Monsters, Baron, Halq, Verte, Electromite etc. None of these cards should be Generic and they all deserve to be banned or have an errata making them only usable in their archetypes or certain types of decks only (Cybers only, Dragon only, Warrior Only etc)
Ip, Sp, and Apollousa just need to be banned in general. Way to generic and way to strong for how easy they are to put out. Tcgplayers aint ready for this convo tho cuz they 🤡
Electrumite requires 2 pendulums so is pendulum only i guess?
I tell you everything needs to be limited to 1
Lord stop saying sanctifier needs to be banned. Get rid of the floodgates. Jowgen, Dino, ido, the statues, Krystia and disciple. They should just go. They are only used for degenerate floodgate crap even beyond Sanctfier.
All that THINKS Appo, I:P, and Shifter needs banned can go play Pokémon or rummy go fish and you will still cry!!!!
Access , IP, and apoul should stay and hurts too many rough decks . 😂
Super based takes 👏
Lavalval chain banned but beatrice lives
Lavalval Chain is Rank 4 though... Beatrice in theory has less Decks she's usable in but I think we're at the point she should go because the Bystial engine is pretty splashable and most of their monsters are Level 6.
Yes IP and Appo definitely need to go
Gimmick puppet Nightmare needs to get banned
Unlimit naturia treee
Appolo,Ariseheart kashtira,kitkalos,zeleantis 🚫🚫🚫🚫
Branded Fusion should be banned too
Access code isn’t OP 😂
Apple did nothing wrong and skill, drain is the best floodgate out of all the floodgates that is the most fair and it just annoys people because they really hate floodgate cards and the fact that skill drain nowadays is so uncompetitive viable that it make it more fair
We need to ban heatwave too
Lmao
Its that damn nightmare
Appo will get banned. Just like Baronne
just ban urself at this point
Apollousa needs to go
Accesscode is fair
4:16 HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! 😂 You serious?
Ban Beatrice and Limit Maxx C YEAH!!! 😈
Stop with this crap yugioh will never be fair or health 😅😅😅😅
hey??!
Stop whining about shifter, never gonna happen and never will. The only reason shifter is seme limit in ocg because of maxx c.
Yes ban shifter