CJI-SC Order Violated? Court Order Sparks Controversy

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 янв 2025

Комментарии • 25

  • @roopashrisinha8378
    @roopashrisinha8378 15 дней назад +1

    If the SC has ordered that new cases should not be entertained , then the RTI activist case should be thrown in the dustbin.

  • @anythinguploads986
    @anythinguploads986 16 дней назад +14

    China is living in 2090, India is still in 1576😂

    • @dfnskJDmfbksdcj
      @dfnskJDmfbksdcj 16 дней назад +1

      Because china has prosecuted the people of religion of terror.
      And in India, SC is not allowing it 😂😂😂😂😂

    • @ShamimKhan-zo8bh
      @ShamimKhan-zo8bh 15 дней назад

      Right.siR.

  • @josephsamson7638
    @josephsamson7638 16 дней назад +4

    Allow CJI to do the justice .., equality, and secularism, freedom of speech etc.. He is next to GOD of the almighty... for poor people and for all religions ...
    FRAMING NEW NEW LAWS CONTRARY TO THE COURT DIRECTIONS WILL DIMINISH THE COURT'S POWERS

  • @berylsapphire
    @berylsapphire 16 дней назад +3

    This is another Nail on the Coffin of Democracy of union of Secular India

  • @theknighterrand
    @theknighterrand 16 дней назад +3

    Court must take strict action against these idiots who just want to waste the time of court, instigate violence and instead of working for countries develop ment these morns are deteriorating the country

    • @RAVITESHKUMAR-bq1pj
      @RAVITESHKUMAR-bq1pj 16 дней назад +1

      Just like illegal Babri, this will also demolished

    • @kaleemsmch
      @kaleemsmch 15 дней назад

      Please check the judgment of Babri masjid.

  • @arunchavan8562
    @arunchavan8562 15 дней назад +1

    Judiciary can interfere in any controvercial matter raised. Question of emotions,communial does not arise. Judiciary may go in deep as prayed. Communal riots is not the question. This would see police,military whenever required.

  • @drssadar1156
    @drssadar1156 16 дней назад +2

    Aligarh : case :: this masjid was formed in 1800..
    Indian constitution came to existence in 1947.
    Too public land or Muncipal records ka kya haii
    Woo uss time k baad ki hai

  • @iqbalahmed9833
    @iqbalahmed9833 15 дней назад +1

    This type of claiming all religious building should not allowed every mosques or temples build before independence how can one man claim there was a temple before this type of filing was not done while British erst ruling had no guts to do now claiming these people should be banned destroying the image of india . British museum has so many indian artifacts go and claim this is stolen from India do they have guts stupid and ignorating ruling india spoiling the hormony and good image of india

  • @arulkumar4682
    @arulkumar4682 16 дней назад +1

    People's choice of regime!

  • @shankarcoach4180
    @shankarcoach4180 16 дней назад +1

    We have lost our own independent 😂😂😂😂😂

  • @ameendalal9921
    @ameendalal9921 16 дней назад +1

    ❤❤❤❤❤NOW ALLAHABAD AND VHP SEMINAR AND ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT CONECTION HAS CAME OUT ... .

  • @RKV8527
    @RKV8527 16 дней назад +2

    Can SC order, not to find out the TRUTH????

  • @lexinicholson8597
    @lexinicholson8597 6 дней назад

    This Khanna seems to be Anti Sanatani if this is so he can go to Palestine and save the Muslims 😢😢😢

  • @ShamimKhan-zo8bh
    @ShamimKhan-zo8bh 15 дней назад

    Violationhan

  • @Spoonfeede
    @Spoonfeede 16 дней назад +2

    How can someone consider a place holy even if there is little evidence that it has been built on someone else's holy place?What barbarians and butchers are livibg amongst us

  • @ShamimKhan-zo8bh
    @ShamimKhan-zo8bh 15 дней назад

    Pahle.jameen.jagah..kika...mi.nahi.5hi.phir.mandir.kyon.5od.

  • @pank5715
    @pank5715 16 дней назад

    Your channel supports anti social elements and Islam . Your views are always against Sanatan Sharma and India as a Nation . Jai Hind.n

  • @dfnskJDmfbksdcj
    @dfnskJDmfbksdcj 16 дней назад

    This CJI should be removed immediately