@@sneakingelephant Step 1: Install Program. Got that? lol Sorry, I had too! Video editing is quite a complex process. There are a ton of tutorials out there that would do a better job teaching you. When the time is right, what I just said will make sense. But for now, there is not much I can do for ya. But good luck!
@@sneakingelephant goto curves section and in lum vs hue u can affect only selected luminance range or goto selection picker section and only choose luminance range and reduce it to only select ur shadow range and denoise that.
noise is a problem because it wastes bandwidth, so the signal has a harder time compressing, so parts of the data that actually do matter will be lost for the majority of viewers like, imagine a photograph of a person on a black vs a noisy background. intuitively, the picture with the black background only needs to convey information about the person, plus a tiny bit more saying that everything else is black. on the other hand, the picture with noisy background needs a lot of extra information, because to a computer, there's a lot going on in the background. if we have a set filesize, then all of the signal we dedicated to reproducing the noisy background is signal that, if we learned to denoise properly, we could dedicate to the person
@@MooPics9898 Long story short (ish), the point of my response that got deleted for whatever reason was that it's not really worth killing detail in your footage to remove noise that is only visible when someone pauses and zooms right in on it, and that it is in fact normal for an image to degrade in quality when you zoom in far. The average viewer isn't going to care to zoom in on your footage looking for noise. Noise of course matters depending on preference and what your goals are, but I just don't think it's worth the hassle getting rid of noise that is only visible if you zoom in, especially if it's at the expense of detail. If you really are fussed about noise however, it's always better to have the correct camera settings, lighting etc before you shoot to avoid there being any noise to begin with and save you having to fix it later. That pretty much sums up what I said, hopefully this one doesn't vanish!
For a video focused on noise, the music is extremely distracting. I don't know what is trying to be communicated by filling an essay on visual quality with obnoxious sound.
I do the opposite, i add noise for the image to have more details in order to the compressors think it has a lot of info and dont compress that much the video (because some of them dont respect when you set them to not compress that much)
Kill Bill was shot by Robert Richardson; as you can see by the hard top light and the excessive amounts of pro mist or nets or whatever in front of the lens. Dope video, though!
Saw the correction in the description but could you also add an annotation mid-video perhaps to point out the flipped sequence of images during the video?
Or… you shoot on a camera with good looking noise like Arri for high end films or Fuji for all of us. Then you don’t have to ruin your image with mushy looking denoising and keep the pretty grain.
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
man the sound and visuals are just amazing
this is the most hype tutorial ever.
Who else clicked on this expecting a video essay lmao
Or, what I do, and I'm no Colorist. I create a luminescence mask and only apply the de-noise to the shadows.
DAMN, thats actually brilliant
How do you go about that (I'm a total noob )
@@sneakingelephant Step 1: Install Program. Got that? lol
Sorry, I had too! Video editing is quite a complex process. There are a ton of tutorials out there that would do a better job teaching you. When the time is right, what I just said will make sense. But for now, there is not much I can do for ya. But good luck!
@@sneakingelephant goto curves section and in lum vs hue u can affect only selected luminance range or goto selection picker section and only choose luminance range and reduce it to only select ur shadow range and denoise that.
@@rechertz8445 thanks!
I'm Brazilian, I love this channel, really relevant and high quality content
Cool tutorial. but I think noise doesn't matter so much if it's only visible when you zoom in far on the image.
It matters more than you think it does. Even the most minute details can affect the overall image in a postitive or negative way
noise is a problem because it wastes bandwidth, so the signal has a harder time compressing, so parts of the data that actually do matter will be lost for the majority of viewers
like, imagine a photograph of a person on a black vs a noisy background. intuitively, the picture with the black background only needs to convey information about the person, plus a tiny bit more saying that everything else is black. on the other hand, the picture with noisy background needs a lot of extra information, because to a computer, there's a lot going on in the background. if we have a set filesize, then all of the signal we dedicated to reproducing the noisy background is signal that, if we learned to denoise properly, we could dedicate to the person
@@phlippy I made quite a long and detailed response to this but for whatever reason it seems to have been deleted...oh well.
@@lottonthewizard4352 I want to know what you said maaaan
@@MooPics9898 Long story short (ish), the point of my response that got deleted for whatever reason was that it's not really worth killing detail in your footage to remove noise that is only visible when someone pauses and zooms right in on it, and that it is in fact normal for an image to degrade in quality when you zoom in far.
The average viewer isn't going to care to zoom in on your footage looking for noise. Noise of course matters depending on preference and what your goals are, but I just don't think it's worth the hassle getting rid of noise that is only visible if you zoom in, especially if it's at the expense of detail.
If you really are fussed about noise however, it's always better to have the correct camera settings, lighting etc before you shoot to avoid there being any noise to begin with and save you having to fix it later.
That pretty much sums up what I said, hopefully this one doesn't vanish!
What a intro to a tutorial 🔥
For a video focused on noise, the music is extremely distracting. I don't know what is trying to be communicated by filling an essay on visual quality with obnoxious sound.
Amateurs overproduce.
I do the opposite, i add noise for the image to have more details in order to the compressors think it has a lot of info and dont compress that much the video (because some of them dont respect when you set them to not compress that much)
Kill Bill was shot by Robert Richardson; as you can see by the hard top light and the excessive amounts of pro mist or nets or whatever in front of the lens. Dope video, though!
This is really helpful thanks, please when are you uploading the next video. There is a movie I’m editing now and a lot of noise inside
*Greig Fraser did not DP Kill Bill: Vol 1, Robert Richardson did
Yes I was wondering about that as well. Rechecked with imdb and greig fraser was not the DP of Kill Bill Vol. 1. It was Robert Richardson
Hahaha, I ran to the comments to say this, so happy it was first
Why do the images "WITH NOISE" look denoised and the images with croma+colorist factory method seem to have a lot more RGB noise in the shadows? 7:14
Check the correction in description
RUclips compression did you dirty on this video. Many of the examples looked no different at 1080p.
Saw the correction in the description but could you also add an annotation mid-video perhaps to point out the flipped sequence of images during the video?
Hey just an fyi at 1:17 it says Greig Fraser was the Director of photography for Kill Bill. He did not DP for Kill Bill. It was Robert Richardson.
what color space and gamma are the Power Grades made for?
I've emailed your support email twice now with no reply.
Thanks so much, your content is really nice.
Learn so much today
really can't even tell om youtube's compression
What’s the music in the beginning of the video ?
Why this chroma+colorista method leave on the black some red noise? In the beard and eyebrows the red noise is very visible. 7:02
Would be nice if you could make a tutorial on Neat Video! 🙏🏾
Thanks for the tutorial. What is the song playing in the end? It's fire!!!!
What's that movie in the beginning of the vid?
Hey, great video!
What font do you use for the film titles? Thank you
i think it's gotham or montstrat
@@tappyfx thank you 🙏🏻
oh it's an ad
1:30 I thought noise in the dark is if you have the ISO turned up too high
what is the cover of this video from?
In the thumbnail? Looks like the movie Arrival.
amazing
why is it so loud
@@codyfleming volume was at the lowest possible, it was too loud
to be honest it looked better with noise then with what you did to it the chroma looks blotchy i can see what looks like small patches every where
Or… you shoot on a camera with good looking noise like Arri for high end films or Fuji for all of us. Then you don’t have to ruin your image with mushy looking denoising and keep the pretty grain.
The title actually triggers me and the whole video was not the thing i was expecu -.-
to be perfectly honest, I was hoping based on the thumbnail that this video would be dissing how boring Denis Villeneuve's color grading is.
90% of ppl consume streamed media... als those codec effectively kill any noise and theatrical "look".... so dont even care
First
Bruh, please, stop with that dubstep techno music
The movie was really dumb, first they can communicate via our speech and out of the sudden they can't anymore