I have a question for you , Tennis TV . Why on earth Clay Court Tournaments unlike Hard and Grass Court tourneys don't have the provision to challenge an Umpire / Line Judge's decision ??
I have seen him do that(not exactly a drunken act) against Murray in AO 2015 and wawrinka ao 2013 for a very brief moment.. Not sure if he does it intentionally to put his opponent off
I remember watching the Djokovic match live and he mentioned that his shoes were sticky and not allowing him to slide. If you look at this now you can see him getting caught on his toes rather than sliding like usual. Still cracks me up all these years later though 😂
At 6:53 you can see when he kicks the official everyone behind him gets scared but the lady in ht black glasses and like a black shirt and gray hair doesn't even flinch is still in this dimension.
Just a note on the Hit the Post one at 5:30, the umpire actually made the correct call because it hit the post, which is outside of the singles stick and therefore a permanent structure. Any ball that strikes a permanent structure is considered out of play, so therefore, it was Cuevas's point because it wasn't a valid return.
@@matija5555 The video literally says the umpire "wrongly" awarded Cuevas the point. However, it was the correct call because the post is a permanent structure. A situation happened recently where Tiafoe touched the net but still won the point because he touched the part beyond the singles stick.
If Hawkeye wasn’t working for on court challenge, then the challenge if forfeit until they fix it. Rafa cannot lose the point there according to rules. Otherwise they can say whatever they want.
5:37: That is correctly Cuevas's point; the part of the net "after" the singles sticks is a permanent fixture; therefore if the ball hits it, it's out.
@Tom R Rules of tennis page 3: "In a singles match played with a doubles net and singles sticks, the net posts and the part of the net outside the singles sticks are permanent fixtures and are not considered as net posts or part of the net. "
@Tom R You are incorrect sir. When the ball hit the post on the right, the ball is already dead. When the ball hit the ground - it is already dead. When the ball was caught by the girl - it is already dead. A ball hitting the net post is an illegal shot in singles match.
5:38 wasnt the wrong decision since the post for 1 on 1 is the other one that they put up and the post that the ball hit is the doubles post and it is for that reason out of bounds and the point is awarded to cuevas
Exactly. It's a bit unprofessional of Garin to complain about it. Tennis is his job after all, he should know the rules of the game. (Also, whoever subtitled it should probably do some researching before claiming the umpire is wrong)
No I don't think the rules specify that. If the ball touches the net (post include) it's not consider out. So the umpire was wrong. Although I would've replay the point as the ballgirl catche the ball before it landed twice (not like Cuevas would've got it anyway but still)
The umpire was right. Any part of the net outside the singles sticks is considered a permanent fixture. It's the same as if the ball hit the umpire chair and landed in.
If there are no singles sticks, the post is in. If there are singles sticks, any part of the net, including the posts, they are outside of the singles sticks are considered out. The umpire was entirely correct.
5:30 Umpire makes the correct decision. It is Cuevas's point. In a singles game played with a doubles net, singles' sticks are used, supporting the net where the posts should have been. Thus, the net is only between the sticks. Everything beyond them, including the post, is a permanent fixture. It is the same as with the umpire's chair. The ball was out on the post.
@@mosart7025hitting around the posts it different to hitting the post as they’ve not hit any out of bounds structure. The post in this instance is effectively out of the court, but hitting around it isn’t as it’s not landed or struck anything.
@@mosart7025 yeah. You tend to see it once in a while when it’s singles match and they have the net posts in to the tram lines. That gives more chance for a shot round the net from out wide.
Since a lot of people actually wanna know, djokovic's shoes were extra sticky that night and wouldn't let him slide. That is why you see him lose balance on the forehand and not on his backhand
What the fuck is this explanation ? There is some strange shots where he doesn't have to slide at all. And do you think he can win 6-1 1sts set against Del Potro with this problem ?
In 5:30 the umpire is right, because the „big“ net post counts as is you would hit the fence and then it would Go back into the field. If he had Hit the inner Post, it wouldnt be a problem
Shoe sole fell off... Rubin: Imma give my shoes away because I can’t use them anymore. It’ll be no use for others but they’ll like like it for no reason
Novaks forehand were probably due to him pushing his body to ridiculous limits. Not stoned, not drunk, not fake for sure. He isn't someone to do those things in such an important match. He lost every point in which he did that, so there's no way he was trying to do that, unless he wanted to lose points
@@ronwatts5827 Of course it has to be demonic possession when a Serb is good at something, right? How else would a Serb be able to be world class at something, right? *Sarcasm off* Seriously, this unjustified hatred and discrimination against Serbs or certain other countries from Americans and westernised Europeans is simply disgusting. When Nadal or Federer are on Top, everything is fine and it's the result of hard work and dedication, but when a Serb gets to the top it's all of a sudden either cheating, doping or new to the collection: demonic possession! This level of jealousy is ridiculous.
Hello, even though u think its his head thats causing this. If you look at his feet u will see that they are really slipping on the field. That explains why after his every hit with racket his form gets off. He doesnt have stable ground and his feet are moving alongside his racquet
@@milostopalovic9765 His shoes are the culprit actually. His sponsor released a new version of tennis shoes and he tried em on for the match. The base of the shoe is smaller than usual and the sides of the shoe don't provide enough grip with the ground. Hence he keeps on losing his balance
5:38 its the right desicion. The post has got the same meaning as a building like the umpire chair or the court wall. Thats why the ball is out of bounse.
Nick delivering those shoes to Stefanos was the high point of the tennis year. The world was in love with the guy. Two weeks later he played a brilliant match against Sonego - fantastic tennis. And the following day. Some people called for a life ban.
In the case of Cuevas the umpire is right because the ball touch the post but the post is not the official of a single match, the net should be less large
I went up to hit an overhead one time, and I hear a clunk. I thought I had just shanked it in another direction, but the ball was nowhere in sight. I then look at my racquet, which has a ball stuck in the throat…
The point should be awarded to cuevas. The post is there for doubles so the net technically ends at the singles sticks. Anything it hits outside of that is loss of point.
What sort of bullshit are you saying lol there's absolutely no rule as to where the ball can touch the net... Lines are there for where the ball BOUNCES, not where it's at in midair. When a player hits the ball from the outside and it hits top of the net on the outside then bounces in that's ALWAYS be good, there's no freaking hawkeye nor "line" judges for the net.
@@2CSST2 The rule is about permanent fixtures. "In a singles match played with a doubles net and singles sticks, the net posts and the part of the net outside the singles sticks are permanent fixtures and are not considered as net posts or part of the net." The ball hit the net outside the singles stick, so it hit a permanent fixture, ergo the ball is out.
Any other bizarre ATP moments not in this video that you love?
Tennis TV can’t beat those covid moments ... you need to sync your instagram page with youtube
I think troicki has more weird moments
Flood lights going off in Federer vs Donskoy match in Dubai 2017
I'd say Serena Williams melting down at a US Open final was pretty bizarre.
I have a question for you , Tennis TV . Why on earth Clay Court Tournaments unlike Hard and Grass Court tourneys don't have the provision to challenge an Umpire / Line Judge's decision ??
The Djokovic clip was just a minor glitch in his code. It’s constantly updating so it’s bound to have some glitches every now and then.
who won that match ?
@@ALLNAMESAREALLREADYT Novak
@Travis Blue wtf man
travis mistry wow you ust think you're funny
@MUFC we dont fucking care fuck of
8:45 yes, Djoker's drunk forehands are by far the strangest things to happen in the last 20 years.
bro i haven’t seen you in ages, lol how you been?
@@angejo5591 fantastic, other than the world-crippling coronavirus lol
How have you been?
@@thebigsquirrel50 good to have you back
@@ThePianoTester glad to see I was missed 😁😂
TheBigSquirrel 50 haha i’m okay
I just can't stop laughing at Novak "drunk" play no matter how many times I watch it 😂
Yeah,I think someone changed the earth gravity that day,Novak felt really hard 😂
I have seen him do that(not exactly a drunken act) against Murray in AO 2015 and wawrinka ao 2013 for a very brief moment.. Not sure if he does it intentionally to put his opponent off
@@vijayendranvijay4538 yes I saw a clip about AO 2015 too =)))
It's indeed weird sometimes
I've never seen anyone else do anything like it. It's remarkable! I still wonder to this day what the heck was going on.
I would say he's on drugs.
Novak's clip makes him look like one of the basketball player in space jam that got their game stolen
Lol right
Random Z stop fucking commenting that it’s not even a sentence
Damnn exactly my thought 😆
@@talbaram7870 who won that match ?
why was he doing this ?
4:03 Troicki was absolutely right! That ball was 100% in
Agree, 100% in
Still wonder , WHY NO PROVISION TO CHALLENGE A LINE JUDGE / UMPIRE'S DECISION in CLAY TOURNAMENTS ????
Mourier is known to make horrible line calls at horrible times. See Goffin-Nadal Monte-Carlo 2017
No, its out
By 100% you mean 1% in?
That expression at 1:50 from nadal is GOLD
I literally heard "In? ... was that out" :D
ruclips.net/video/pWsvD8X6q8s/видео.html
The fucking hand gesture 🤏🏼 got me
he's just like ''really???''
Creo que dice “WHAT?”
“Give me the camera.” 😂😂😂
Right or wrong that’s one of my favourite tennis moments of all time, just wonderfully brash and desperate
11:00 "I've seen a few balls get stuck in the throat". 😂😂😂
*Djokovic moments are perhaps the most bizarre thing happened not just in Tennis but in any sports.*
who won that match ?
@@ALLNAMESAREALLREADYT Delpo.
Edit: I was wrong. Djokovic won.
Matrix!!!🙄🙄🙄
but wtf happend, i dont get it? Did his shoes stick to ground or his racket didnt roll in his hand?
J Smith muscles cramp
I remember watching the Djokovic match live and he mentioned that his shoes were sticky and not allowing him to slide. If you look at this now you can see him getting caught on his toes rather than sliding like usual. Still cracks me up all these years later though 😂
Thanks for letting us know... I couldn't understand why he was playing like that..
He won 1st set 6-1 with this problem !? Sounds super weird as an explanation
Ahhh so now I understand! Thanks for the explanation
@@leodumora5498 it was more Del Potro not playing as well which is why the first set was easily for Novak
Those Adidas shoes were trash, switch to ASICS for better experience 😂😂😂
At 6:53 you can see when he kicks the official everyone behind him gets scared but the lady in ht black glasses and like a black shirt and gray hair doesn't even flinch is still in this dimension.
She's like a matrix
Damn bro, nice catch
She's like blind
Love troicki's bursts of rage
I do too, this guy is so intense
Just a note on the Hit the Post one at 5:30, the umpire actually made the correct call because it hit the post, which is outside of the singles stick and therefore a permanent structure. Any ball that strikes a permanent structure is considered out of play, so therefore, it was Cuevas's point because it wasn't a valid return.
Thats not true. He gave the point to garin.
@@matija5555 The video literally says the umpire "wrongly" awarded Cuevas the point. However, it was the correct call because the post is a permanent structure. A situation happened recently where Tiafoe touched the net but still won the point because he touched the part beyond the singles stick.
u can see that the ball girl caught the ball before it bounced trwice so technically it’s a redo
@@paytonnguyen40 I can also see that you have literally no idea what you're talking about
Jackson the ball girl caught the ball before it bounced twice. That’s an interference and it’s a redo.
Umpire: *ball was in*
Rafa: *wut?*
1:52 life or death 😅
Rafa: Unbileebull.
@@mikkokarkkainen2807 1:58
*W U T?*
If Hawkeye wasn’t working for on court challenge, then the challenge if forfeit until they fix it. Rafa cannot lose the point there according to rules. Otherwise they can say whatever they want.
@@JnoPrds but it was working just not the visuals
8:45 FYI, Djokovic actually won that match! :D
It's Djokovic, what do you expect
Djokovic... I laughed so loud... “drunk” play by him was brilliant😂😂😂😂
Novak is so flexible.... He is like a elastic man.
Well everyday he stretches for 1 hour a day everyday so that will help.
10:55 I was today years old when I found out that part of the racket is called the throat
you learn something new each day
Snape was in the audience doing his thing on Djoker.
Nole had some sorta software malfunction on his forehand hits idk why but it’s so funny every time I watch it 😂
5:37: That is correctly Cuevas's point; the part of the net "after" the singles sticks is a permanent fixture; therefore if the ball hits it, it's out.
THAT IS CORRECT! :-)
@Tom R Rules of tennis page 3:
"In a singles match played with a doubles net and singles sticks, the net posts and the
part of the net outside the singles sticks are permanent fixtures and are not considered
as net posts or part of the net.
"
@Tom R
You are incorrect sir.
When the ball hit the post on the right, the ball is already dead.
When the ball hit the ground - it is already dead.
When the ball was caught by the girl - it is already dead.
A ball hitting the net post is an illegal shot in singles match.
@Tom R Yes. the video is wrong, because Cuevas won the point as he should. The umpire gave the correct decision. the text in the subtitle is wrong.
@Tom R Yes, the information in the tab is wrong.
Djokovic is playing drunk Kungfu! Can’t stop laughing!
Novak flip-flopping (not in jest)playing Del Potro is the funniest thing I've seen during a match between top players....so funny!!
The iguana is one of the most memorable moments in tennis ever.
Guess that Open got a new mascot heh?
Troicki was right. That's 100% line 4:02
I've never understood what happened to Novak xD
Thomas Rodot Too much lead tape...
May be vertigo
Thomas Rodot his meds wore off.
And it was mostly just on the forehand side. That’s even weirder.
Seems like there was something wrong with his shoes to me, like he couldn't slide at all. It was as if they were too sticky.
Djokovic play made my day. I had not laughed so much recently.
🇷🇸Troicki: ''Give me the camera please '' 🏃🏻
🇷🇸Djoković: I don't even know what that was but it's great 😅
Looks like Snape was jinxing Djokovic's racket 😂😂 8:51
Djokovic’s drunk forehands crack me up
5:38 wasnt the wrong decision since the post for 1 on 1 is the other one that they put up and the post that the ball hit is the doubles post and it is for that reason out of bounds and the point is awarded to cuevas
Exactly. It's a bit unprofessional of Garin to complain about it. Tennis is his job after all, he should know the rules of the game. (Also, whoever subtitled it should probably do some researching before claiming the umpire is wrong)
Even tennis tv dont know the tennis rules
No I don't think the rules specify that. If the ball touches the net (post include) it's not consider out. So the umpire was wrong. Although I would've replay the point as the ballgirl catche the ball before it landed twice (not like Cuevas would've got it anyway but still)
The umpire was right. Any part of the net outside the singles sticks is considered a permanent fixture. It's the same as if the ball hit the umpire chair and landed in.
If there are no singles sticks, the post is in. If there are singles sticks, any part of the net, including the posts, they are outside of the singles sticks are considered out. The umpire was entirely correct.
11:00 That's what she said!
Nick Krygios brings opponents shoes.
Commentators “we’ve seen it all”
Kyrgios and Tsitsipas are friends and compatriots
Vesely: I cannot play with this here
Haas: lemme take a selfie right quick
5:30 Umpire makes the correct decision. It is Cuevas's point. In a singles game played with a doubles net, singles' sticks are used, supporting the net where the posts should have been. Thus, the net is only between the sticks. Everything beyond them, including the post, is a permanent fixture. It is the same as with the umpire's chair. The ball was out on the post.
But they can hit around the posts and if it goes in the opponents court it is good. How does that work?!
@@mosart7025hitting around the posts it different to hitting the post as they’ve not hit any out of bounds structure. The post in this instance is effectively out of the court, but hitting around it isn’t as it’s not landed or struck anything.
@@Heathen.Deity. Ah ha. Thanks for clarifying that. I saw Bublik do it last week against Shelton. A couple years ago I didn't know it was legal.
@@mosart7025 yeah. You tend to see it once in a while when it’s singles match and they have the net posts in to the tram lines. That gives more chance for a shot round the net from out wide.
@@Heathen.Deity. 😉 Got it. Thanks!
Novak had too many tequila shots before the match 😂😂😂😴
No because he won the first set 6-1. Had to be some glitch in his code 😂
Djokovic’s drunk play is amazing 🤩!!!! 😂
8:56 ok my man Djocovki has to be match fixing their is no way he hit himself with the racquet more than 3 times in a match
00:12 When you bought Adidas from Aliexpress for $ 10
))
только наш такое мог написать )
@@dommspase :D
they are like sports shoes from K-mart or Walmart ahaha
The day that Djoker forgot how to tennis 😂
😝😝😝
And still won 😂
Seeing Murray talking to Lopez after the mistake just warmed my heart.
6:30 that granny didn't move a bit from the shoot !
She was like:Who cares?
She's blind.
Hawkeye not showing the ball got me in tears 😂😂😂
10:08
The effects of Novak's coffee wearing off😂
Washington is a hub for defective shoes ... Rubin then Tsitsipas .
11:00 the comment "I've seen a few balls get stuck in the throat" might not be relevant for you, but I cringed.
Underrated comment
Rafa's expressions😂
Since a lot of people actually wanna know, djokovic's shoes were extra sticky that night and wouldn't let him slide. That is why you see him lose balance on the forehand and not on his backhand
Are you sure about that,because if it was his shoes he would have problems to hit the ball both sides,maybe it was the court,or earth gravity 😂
Not really. He plants his feet during the backhand but rotates his foot during the forehand
What the fuck is this explanation ? There is some strange shots where he doesn't have to slide at all.
And do you think he can win 6-1 1sts set against Del Potro with this problem ?
He clearly lost his balance on the BH at least once though, where he bent almost halfway backwards lol
6:32 i remember that moment, i watch with my brother and i was shock when Nalbandian did that
Do you perhaps remember if he was disqualified for that?
@@zlatan_2197 he was
@@caillouoof9167 Thank you
I have a question about Djokovic at 10:42 and throughout that whole sequence of shots by him. Did he lose that match on purpose?
He actually won😂
1:40
When ur standing in a bus stop....you farted and everyone noticed it.
yeah pretty true
HAHAHAHAHAHA
😝😝😝
ruclips.net/video/pWsvD8X6q8s/видео.html
In 5:30 the umpire is right, because the „big“ net post counts as is you would hit the fence and then it would Go back into the field. If he had Hit the inner Post, it wouldnt be a problem
1:48 just look at Nadal's face 🤣🤣🤣
Shoe sole fell off...
Rubin: Imma give my shoes away because I can’t use them anymore. It’ll be no use for others but they’ll like like it for no reason
you can totally sew the sole back on. Gringos and their consumerism...
Sell it on ebay
ruclips.net/video/pWsvD8X6q8s/видео.html
@@lobomalsano oh yeah that could work
8:56 The Matrix 😂
that phantom challenge would've broken kyrgios mentally. crazy they gave it and the control nadal goat had
No one:
Absolutely no one:
Nadal: 1:49
Novaks forehand were probably due to him pushing his body to ridiculous limits. Not stoned, not drunk, not fake for sure. He isn't someone to do those things in such an important match. He lost every point in which he did that, so there's no way he was trying to do that, unless he wanted to lose points
Sticky shoes it has happened to Hewitt and Roddick before. It's your feet not getting any traction, leads to you feeling like a spring.
Novak playing like you put a pair of shoes on a cat haha
9:10 Someone tell me what’s happening to Djokovic
.
Demonic possession (obviously)
@@ronwatts5827 Of course it has to be demonic possession when a Serb is good at something, right? How else would a Serb be able to be world class at something, right? *Sarcasm off* Seriously, this unjustified hatred and discrimination against Serbs or certain other countries from Americans and westernised Europeans is simply disgusting. When Nadal or Federer are on Top, everything is fine and it's the result of hard work and dedication, but when a Serb gets to the top it's all of a sudden either cheating, doping or new to the collection: demonic possession! This level of jealousy is ridiculous.
@@mikipav1064 dont
@@celestemcdermott1619 But i do.
Viktor is a legend for this.
what happened Novak? 8:52 - 10:45
He drank so fucking much
Hello, even though u think its his head thats causing this. If you look at his feet u will see that they are really slipping on the field. That explains why after his every hit with racket his form gets off. He doesnt have stable ground and his feet are moving alongside his racquet
@@milostopalovic9765 His shoes are the culprit actually. His sponsor released a new version of tennis shoes and he tried em on for the match. The base of the shoe is smaller than usual and the sides of the shoe don't provide enough grip with the ground. Hence he keeps on losing his balance
The iguana didn't know you had to pay for a ticket. Poor lad ❤.
5:38 its the right desicion. The post has got the same meaning as a building like the umpire chair or the court wall. Thats why the ball is out of bounse.
Nalbandian very fortunate to not get suspended for a lot longer or have the man press assault charges. What an unbelievably boneheaded move.
Literally every single time Krygios and tystipas play each other shit goes down
10:20
What the hell with Djokovic
Nick delivering those shoes to Stefanos was the high point of the tennis year. The world was in love with the guy. Two weeks later he played a brilliant match against Sonego - fantastic tennis. And the following day. Some people called for a life ban.
0:44 back to John Wayne western movies
0:09 Isner literally went "What the f***" 🤣🤣
Right through the racket. This is like anome "prince of tennis"🤘😊👍💯
That very last clip; wow, that is such a rarity.
Skip to 10:57 and listen. 😂😂😂😂
Nobody talks about how scary this pov is 5:06
It's normal that Cuevas won the point, since there are singles sticks in the net anything after that isn't considered part of the court
Troicki, typically Serbian, love it :)
8:45Why is Djokovic making strange moves ？
ジョコさん、疲れで足ガックガクやったんかな
I was there in Miami when the iguana arrived, I had to pinch myself, I will never forget it, I will tell it to my grandchildren
I want a compilation of animals interrupting sporting events
Awesome video and this shoe incident happened with me too haha. I was coming from my school when this happened. Haha🤘😊👍💯
Djokovic’s play is the most bizzarest thing to me in this video.
who won that match ?
@@ALLNAMESAREALLREADYT Djokovic, 6-1 3-6 7-6(7-3) it was the Shanghai 2013 Final
That's why people love nole he can dance while hitting the ball .
In the case of Cuevas the umpire is right because the ball touch the post but the post is not the official of a single match, the net should be less large
I was actually there for the Tsitsipas - Kyrgios showdown. Later on, Nick asked a fan where to place his serve before acing the match point.
Djokovic debió ganar el Oscar en 2013 😂😂😂
Amazing video, one of the best I have watched today 👍🏼
I went up to hit an overhead one time, and I hear a clunk. I thought I had just shanked it in another direction, but the ball was nowhere in sight. I then look at my racquet, which has a ball stuck in the throat…
7:05 is the type of rules I'd like to know about. When I saw it wasn't allowed to bounce out, I knew that was wrong.
Why Nalbandian have done that? Totally unnecessary at this score, he was leading with one set!
So it'd be okay if he was losing? lol
Shouldn't Garin's point technically have been replayed? The ballgirl caught the ball before it had bounced twice.
I learned about that rule, not sure if it's legit tho, a few weeks ago and it happens a lot!
minute?
The point should be awarded to cuevas. The post is there for doubles so the net technically ends at the singles sticks. Anything it hits outside of that is loss of point.
@@luciandclam exactly ! So the subtitles are wrong.
@@fabienchelles9572 yup. Subtitles are wrong
What in the world was going on with Novak? 😂😂
8:49 “Waluigi time!”
8:15 Imagine feeling so privileged you can't untie your shoelaces....
I hate Tsitsipas but he is a good player
it's your trainer who unties the laces
They said it was broke
5:34 Correct decision. This is singles, not doubles.
What sort of bullshit are you saying lol there's absolutely no rule as to where the ball can touch the net... Lines are there for where the ball BOUNCES, not where it's at in midair. When a player hits the ball from the outside and it hits top of the net on the outside then bounces in that's ALWAYS be good, there's no freaking hawkeye nor "line" judges for the net.
@@2CSST2 The rule is about permanent fixtures. "In a singles match played with a doubles net and singles sticks, the net posts and
the part of the net outside the singles sticks are permanent fixtures and are not
considered as net posts or part of the net." The ball hit the net outside the singles stick, so it hit a permanent fixture, ergo the ball is out.
@@ChrystGryderMaakorey Thank you :)
@@2CSST2 Look the comment below yours. That's what I was trying to say ;) Apparently there is a rule for that.
What was in the bottle of djokernole 😂🤣
Nole, "the great showman" in ATP 😅
Umpire was correct to give Cuevas the point, it can’t hit outside the net pole in the tramlines
That's wrong.
www.usta.com/content/dam/usta/pdfs/USTA-Officiating-Scenarios-and-Interpretations.pdf
Pg. 3 (5)
Yes you are right. If it was only a singles net, then the post counts as a part of the net
Correct, is a SINGLE NET, and the ball hit border out of the stick of single.
@@elijahs.1429 the part of the net where the emirates sponsorship is is the doubles net, if it hits there, or the net post the ball is dead
11:00! "Seen a few balls get stuck in the throat, but never right through it."
😐🤨😅😆
seriously, what's that with Novak xD? somehow funny somehow he looks seriously ill there
I think his shoes were sticky
His shoes didn't slide, they were sticky. I remember that he changes his shies that match
He looked like the aliens from space jam took his talent lmaoo
@@NM-ej3xw And Novak does love to put on a show…make sure everyone else knows his shoes aren't right ;)
@@MarkMyerson Half true lol. His rraction was a bit over the top