Not for video it isn't. It has stabilization issues (especially at 4K60) and awful low light noise at 5x and above. It's white balance is too green in dull conditions also.
Nah look at the video quality, vivo is better idk why apple fans aren't admitting this , yes selfie camera isn't good on vivo but normal rear video is better@@Zihad19Gaming
@Getquora first of all I'm not an apple fan boy . Secondly Vivo's video isn't perfect. Lens switching has gotten better in vivo but overall iPhone is still better.
I knew it, iphone doesnt use its telephoto at 5x zoom at night lol, it only switches when you go over 10x to force use the telephoto, no wonder it look so grainy and blurry at 13:40
I was an apple man until the vivo x80 pro but i still use the latest iPhone until today. Sold the 16 pro max and keep the x200 pro. Its not just that i like the camera more its also what you can do afterwards. Record a 4k120fps slowmotion and set it as live wallpaper YEY. Or record a video and edit it with music in the built in app. No third party needed. The telephoto on the 16 pro is just a potato. Its insane.
I can tell your favoritism to the iphone at the beginning. "vivo is inferior...". and then slowly you start to praise iphone less through the video and still not give vivo it's props. I think there is some cognitive dissonance.
I wonder how iPhones do HDR in video? It seems like nobody can really do the same job as them. Do they do 1 frame of higher exposure to apply it to highlights to other 5 frames?
I feel he switched the phone name 😉 Iphone can't match vivo interms of camera quality only advantage is video thats it.. Paid video review untrusted ...watch other youtuber and see the difference🤣
You can try to put all photos side by side. And if possible, record Videos on both phones at once & also show them side by side. Maybe add a "Mic" emoji on which phone's mic test we are hearing.
As much as the Oppo Find X7 Ultra and Vivo X100 Pro (yes the X100 Pro, not the Ultra which has a serious problem with white balance management and color saturation) were and still are and without context (pending the release of the Oppo Find X7 Ultra and Vivo X200 Ultra) the best camera phones and are really above the competition, as much and contrary to what the current trend/hype would have us believe, the Vivo X200 Pro and Oppo Find X8 Pro are not really better than the iPhone 16 Pro Max , Galaxy S24 Ultra, and Pixel 9 Pro XL when it comes to photo-video, they are in fact all neck and neck, each with its strengths and weaknesses, but none are completely superior like the Vivo X100 Pro and Oppo Find X7 Ultra 🤷🏽♂️
Please tell me which one is better for blogging, one plus13 or vivo x200 pro or iPhone 16 pro max or Samsung S25 ultra(jan/22/2025 release samsungs25 ultra)?
it's amazing how vivo beat the iphone in photos and video capabilities, but recording at 4k 60 is better on the iphone because it's the only one who doesn't reduce frame rate in difficult conditions
First RUclipsr video i saw who said iphone better sharper zoom😂 And I don't why ur phone always beautifying picture. I am using x200 pro last 1 month. Every singel photo are very sharp like i saw natural. If u want to see my photo i capture with x200 pro. I will give u google drive link. Check it how sharp details and natural look.
It already does best iPhone in video. Far better colour science, low light, slow motion, autofocus and the zoom camera literally is incredible up to around 9x and even usable to 15x. Have both phones and Vivo is FAR ahead. It's no hype. The microphone on VIVO is also superior by far.
yes definitely. things only vivo can do in terms of videography: 1. optical LOG video with telephoto lens 2. 120 slomo video with telephoto lens 3. super close-up or micro shots capability with telephoto lens 4. internal recording of LOG video with 30fps@4k 5. muuuuuch better low light performance with telephoto lens 6. better detail with 10x telephoto video 7. with Zeiss camera coding, it doesn't not suffer from the horrible lens flare when shooting against light in night, comparing to that of iPhone all above are just facts.
Vivo X200 Pro is good, but not the best Vivo camera phone for 2024. People seem to forget the X100 Ultra which has the same telephoto sensor as the X200 Pro, but has a 1" main sensor, a better ultra wide sensor, and a significantly better selfie cam. The only disadvantage is the China rom, which is not a deal breaker for me, but I'm sure it will be for some. If/when Vivo starts launching their Ultra phones globally, that will be the real game changer.
For pro photographers, photo editing is as natural as breathing. Phones like vivo are just doing the groundwork for you in advance. Maybe digital enthusiasts aren't in the know or aren't used to this, thinking that photos have to be straight out of the camera to be considered good. It's a bit of a purist stance, if you ask me. Even so, if you really believe that the rawest data is the best, you can totally go for shooting in pro mode and get the raw files. Your phone will give you the most pristine CMOS data. But then, many might find it "too raw." When you think about it, it's a pretty contradictory and hilarious standard to judge by.
Thanks for this comparison! I've been thinking about getting a Vivo to replace my iPhone for six months now, listening to the hype about its photo capabilities. But I haven't seen an incredible leap that would make me have to change my iPhone 14 Pro Max.
vivo must have to work on their front camera stabilization seriously and I think global variant of vivo do more beautification and face whiting then Indian variants and still iPhone has better camera and videos till now if you can't use zoom too much .
It's actually opposite. I get your point. I actually own x200 pro. I did photo comparisons against 16 pro max and s24ultra, it's better than both. These RUclipsrs often show iphone and Samsung better than other brands. You never know until you use both of them at the same time. I am telling this from my experience.
I thought Vivo wins but as per checking a lot of phone camera comparisons, it's not. Vivo's photo was vibrant and over-sharpened, it doesn't look real. The only Vivo wins over iPhone 16 is the video quality at night. Overall shots, I would still choose iPhone and... its contender phones such Samsung and Pixel.
Feel you have not put off beauti mode and vivid mode off while comparison I too have both phones , In my pics the vivo makes more details on face , spot blemishes etc.
I'm not an iPhone fan, but I prefer most of the photo and video output from the iPhone 16 PM. Also the camera bump on the vivo phone looks way too big and OTT. The designs of iPhones, Pixels and Samsung's are more subtle
@@r.k.lalnunziraWhy all the fake hype?. The Vivo has bad stabilization on video (especially at 4K60) and it's low light zoom at 5x above is way too noisy and weak in detail. It's white balance tends to a green hue in dull weather conditions. And it's selfie camera is an embarrassment.
@@neilmcguinness4422 In this review was opposite, iphone white balance was off, in day light it showed blue snow, in night yellow snow, while vivo kept it white as it should be. Only selfie camera is worse, but for me personally is not an issue, I never use it.
I definitely prefer the more contrasty look of the iPhone, the only real league the vivo has is really the zoom the selfie kinda sucks and everything else is really close
As much as I want to hate the iphone but its just consistent, the Vivo has so many over exposed photos. May be because it was clicked on point and shoot and not focused on the subject before shooting? And the skin smoothness is something you just cant get rid of, coming from a vivo X100 pro. No amount of turning it off, vivid or textured mode etc, the skin is just not better than the iphone.
nope. no vivo at least for me. the contrast & vibrancy are too much. look unrealistic & fake. colors are different from actual. lack of details on potrait mode but the zoom lens is good.
Vivo is set to vivid mode by default. Other youtubers show the difference between vivid and natural mode. If the setting is changed, you´ll find the results extremely similar
Vivo is over hyped the front is brushed up and not good tbh but rear cameras are good but they are not optimized for social media and I don't they are better than what Samsung offered
As a Vivo X100 Ultra user, the iPhone seemed better in almost everything. Video stability, quality, sound. Then the photo's looked better in colour and exposure. The Vivo did better in a few images, low light video and zoom of course.
And yet don't fall in one comparison video. Techmo already proved that x200 pro is superior to iphone 16 pro max. Also x200 pro is better than x100 ultra
Sorry if i am wrong.i totally respect your perspective and i might have perceived it wrong .The reason i said that is because i recently got an upgrade from 13pro max to 16pro max and i had got a chance to compare my apple with a vivo x200pro which my friend had purchased lately. I felt a bit dissapointed spending 45% extra for my apple which doesnt serve the purpose or value for the amount paid. I felt instant regret for my purchase because considering the fact that this phone is pretty damn cheap compared to an iphone i must say that phone crushed my apple in almost every other department.( i felt high end gaming to be a bit better in iphone though)
Vivo takes better photos than IPhone, but the IPhone takes better video. The IPhone is the better overall device in terms of software and software optimization and gaming ability. Apple customer support is light years ahead of Vivo's also.
Hello brother can you help me give galaxy s24 fe phone gift for me please. I am long time follow your yt account. And I biggest fan you . Please can you help me. I am not afford smart phone my family backround is poor.
Vivo kills it.
Yes ! Do check my comparison too
Video performance is better than iphone 😮
WOW! That Vivo X200 Pro is amazing. For me that Vivo X200 Pro is the best camera phone right now.
Not for video it isn't. It has stabilization issues (especially at 4K60) and awful low light noise at 5x and above. It's white balance is too green in dull conditions also.
@@neilmcguinness4422 weird because in this review stabilization looked better on vivo
Night videos are better in vivo.@@neilmcguinness4422
Vivo looks much better.
Красит
Vivo is better than the iphone
Only in terms of photos and battery
Vivo is better in videography too, watch it again@@Zihad19Gaming
Nah look at the video quality, vivo is better idk why apple fans aren't admitting this , yes selfie camera isn't good on vivo but normal rear video is better@@Zihad19Gaming
@Getquora first of all I'm not an apple fan boy . Secondly Vivo's video isn't perfect. Lens switching has gotten better in vivo but overall iPhone is still better.
These are the most important@@Zihad19Gaming
I knew it, iphone doesnt use its telephoto at 5x zoom at night lol, it only switches when you go over 10x to force use the telephoto, no wonder it look so grainy and blurry at 13:40
colour is not everything, sharpness,details, exposure, dynamic range everything matters
He did prioritize sharpness, detail, exposure, and everything tho? You probably didn't watch the whole video
@@missyayaralook at the night video comparison, 13:00 , see that on the sign , iphone is a lot struggling with focus and losing the details
I was an apple man until the vivo x80 pro but i still use the latest iPhone until today.
Sold the 16 pro max and keep the x200 pro.
Its not just that i like the camera more its also what you can do afterwards.
Record a 4k120fps slowmotion and set it as live wallpaper YEY.
Or record a video and edit it with music in the built in app. No third party needed.
The telephoto on the 16 pro is just a potato. Its insane.
Pixal 4a is better on camera, video than Vivo X200 Pro.
How do people see that Vivo is better? 16pro looks better in my own eye😅
Yeah
Vivio x200 pro👍
I can tell your favoritism to the iphone at the beginning. "vivo is inferior...". and then slowly you start to praise iphone less through the video and still not give vivo it's props. I think there is some cognitive dissonance.
Nope. I'm unbiased. More of personal preference. Everyone, including other creators have preference.
Bro, why would you enable beautification mode on the Vivo?
@TechBoilers, X200 Pro china variant smoothens the face aggressively unfortunately.
I wonder how iPhones do HDR in video? It seems like nobody can really do the same job as them. Do they do 1 frame of higher exposure to apply it to highlights to other 5 frames?
Vivo pictures look like DSLR 😍
More like 1"camera 👍
Why is he using vivid mode on the Vivo but he likes more neutral colours??
Make it make sense
I feel he switched the phone name 😉 Iphone can't match vivo interms of camera quality only advantage is video thats it.. Paid video review untrusted ...watch other youtuber and see the difference🤣
Nice very good 👍🏻
cry more.
Which variant of the x200 pro are you using? China or global?
China
Vivo yellowish algoritm is more iphone than iphone it self
iPhone is green not yellow
Are you in Edmonton ?
Calgary 🥂
@GadgetRevNow I ordered the x200 Pro it's coming in either Monday or Wednesday do you have the China version?
Where can i get vivo x 200pro to buy which is not a Chinese version?
Check alibaba for global
happy new year dyan kuya! great content
Happy New Year! Thank you! 🥂
Vivo- in telephoto, zooming and in night🗿 and rest of the things in i phone🗿
I'm planning on buying the Vivo X200 Pro, just don't wanna get it close to the ultra. It seems it may come out during the month of May
Thank you so much. Also especially for also testing stabilization which gets forgotten often :)
You’re welcome! Always gotta check the stabilization. 😉
You can try to put all photos side by side. And if possible, record Videos on both phones at once & also show them side by side. Maybe add a "Mic" emoji on which phone's mic test we are hearing.
Yes ! Do check my comparison too
i think vivo more better, specialy on low light.
vivo best
First bro
You are! Thanks for watching! 🎉
Vivo won
As much as the Oppo Find X7 Ultra and Vivo X100 Pro (yes the X100 Pro, not the Ultra which has a serious problem with white balance management and color saturation) were and still are and without context (pending the release of the Oppo Find X7 Ultra and Vivo X200 Ultra) the best camera phones and are really above the competition, as much and contrary to what the current trend/hype would have us believe, the Vivo X200 Pro and Oppo Find X8 Pro are not really better than the iPhone 16 Pro Max , Galaxy S24 Ultra, and Pixel 9 Pro XL when it comes to photo-video, they are in fact all neck and neck, each with its strengths and weaknesses, but none are completely superior like the Vivo X100 Pro and Oppo Find X7 Ultra 🤷🏽♂️
I agree. But as a x100 pro user, i really want that semi flat screen and better battery life with ultrasonic fingerprint sensor
@aroundmeph1145 Wait for the X200 Ultra or Oppo Find X8 Ultra
X100 Pro as one big weakness, that is the font facing camera.
@sumbunleng2335 its not as bad as you think tho.
Yes ! Do check my comparison too
It is interesting to see that the color temperature of both models appears to be reversed in daylight and nightlight
Now vivo only needs a reliable Software experience and Flat display phoness .. Then it would be besttt
Also add desktop support like Samsung DeX. 😉
2.02..😂😂...girls would definitely like vivo's output...
iPhone captures the jacket better and that's why iPhones are better
Also the colour of his face is better
Yes ! Do check my comparison too
Please tell me which one is better for blogging, one plus13 or vivo x200 pro or iPhone 16 pro max or Samsung S25 ultra(jan/22/2025 release samsungs25 ultra)?
If you want for videos then go for iphone 16 promax.
it's amazing how vivo beat the iphone in photos and video capabilities, but recording at 4k 60 is better on the iphone because it's the only one who doesn't reduce frame rate in difficult conditions
Photos yes, but in video it is still a distance behind. As you would expect from a cheaper device.
Only in low light video and in zoom the rest was better on the iPhone.
Vivo x200 Pro - $729 // Iphone 16 pro Max $1,200.
iphone still $1,500 in middle east
Vivo X200 Pro $1,200 // iPhone 16 Pro Max $1,500 in Southeast Asia
First RUclipsr video i saw who said iphone better sharper zoom😂
And I don't why ur phone always beautifying picture. I am using x200 pro last 1 month. Every singel photo are very sharp like i saw natural. If u want to see my photo i capture with x200 pro. I will give u google drive link. Check it how sharp details and natural look.
Which phone is the best of these two phones. One suggest.
I'm the creator of this comparison test, considering everything not just camera and money isn't a problem, go for iPhone 16 Pro Max.
@GadgetRevNow money is not a problem . My preference is performance ,camera ,look &build.
@GadgetRevNow your comparison is so nice.i like your honest comparison.
X200 pro is way ahead in photography. Updates on the way will beat iPhone in videograhy too.
Not in video it won't. It is too far behind in key areas.
It already does best iPhone in video. Far better colour science, low light, slow motion, autofocus and the zoom camera literally is incredible up to around 9x and even usable to 15x. Have both phones and Vivo is FAR ahead. It's no hype. The microphone on VIVO is also superior by far.
yes definitely. things only vivo can do in terms of videography:
1. optical LOG video with telephoto lens
2. 120 slomo video with telephoto lens
3. super close-up or micro shots capability with telephoto lens
4. internal recording of LOG video with 30fps@4k
5. muuuuuch better low light performance with telephoto lens
6. better detail with 10x telephoto video
7. with Zeiss camera coding, it doesn't not suffer from the horrible lens flare when shooting against light in night, comparing to that of iPhone
all above are just facts.
Vivo🔥🔥
Now is vivo era... Nice...
❤️❤️❤️
iphone color best .best important think color
Vivo X200 Pro is good, but not the best Vivo camera phone for 2024. People seem to forget the X100 Ultra which has the same telephoto sensor as the X200 Pro, but has a 1" main sensor, a better ultra wide sensor, and a significantly better selfie cam. The only disadvantage is the China rom, which is not a deal breaker for me, but I'm sure it will be for some. If/when Vivo starts launching their Ultra phones globally, that will be the real game changer.
11:48 green ice on vivo😂😂😂😂😂
Uses RGB sensor, some phones use RYB.
it seems like u recorded the video and then proceed to zoom, it means all the zoom is digital and not using the telephoto lens.
Iphone's video is blueish. Snow is blueish.
Vivo snow is magenta
@mauricedicke9527 I prefer magenta to blue
Vivo potęga!!!
Chinese or global version?
Chinese
Been watching your reviews since when i had a phone but now my phone is gone
For pro photographers, photo editing is as natural as breathing. Phones like vivo are just doing the groundwork for you in advance. Maybe digital enthusiasts aren't in the know or aren't used to this, thinking that photos have to be straight out of the camera to be considered good. It's a bit of a purist stance, if you ask me.
Even so, if you really believe that the rawest data is the best, you can totally go for shooting in pro mode and get the raw files. Your phone will give you the most pristine CMOS data. But then, many might find it "too raw." When you think about it, it's a pretty contradictory and hilarious standard to judge by.
The audio quality on the Vivo is absolutely horrendous 😬
Love the audio coming out of iPhone. Maybe because Vivo was compared to one of the cleanest audio? 🤜🤛
There is so much clipping in the Vivo image at 5:00. That looks very bad from Vivo honestly.
Thanks for this comparison! I've been thinking about getting a Vivo to replace my iPhone for six months now, listening to the hype about its photo capabilities. But I haven't seen an incredible leap that would make me have to change my iPhone 14 Pro Max.
@@planerbeat Exactly my thought 😄
Flagships are so good that you only feel the difference after 4 or 5 years.
The only reason to upgrade your flagship is because of battery life.
If you use your selfie cam don't get the Vivo lol don't fall for the hype keep using your current phone lol
Just Google negative points about X200 Pro. The list it gives is a long one, and cuts through all the hype and falsehoods.
@@neilmcguinness4422 totally fake. I own the Vivo X200 Pro and is a fantastic phones, its cameras have no rival, battery, display, CPU all.
Mobile phones are not solely purchased for their cameras; they offer a multitude of practical features that cater to our daily needs.
Yess
vivo must have to work on their front camera stabilization seriously and I think global variant of vivo do more beautification and face whiting then Indian variants and still iPhone has better camera and videos till now if you can't use zoom too much .
It's actually opposite. I get your point. I actually own x200 pro. I did photo comparisons against 16 pro max and s24ultra, it's better than both. These RUclipsrs often show iphone and Samsung better than other brands. You never know until you use both of them at the same time. I am telling this from my experience.
is it possible to turn off the AI drawing in Vivo? cause most of the time Vivo is "drawing" photos, specialy in bad light conditions
It's not possible, even when you turn off beauty it forcefully enables it and draws bs
Iphone >>>>>>>
You're joking
wow VIVO ❤...is better to iphone now camera
👍👍👍
Vivo
I still prefer the vivo in all
Nice!
Maganda lang yan at first ang vivo pero consistency in terms of OS and hardware iphone. Fact! 🫰
I thought Vivo wins but as per checking a lot of phone camera comparisons, it's not. Vivo's photo was vibrant and over-sharpened, it doesn't look real. The only Vivo wins over iPhone 16 is the video quality at night. Overall shots, I would still choose iPhone and... its contender phones such Samsung and Pixel.
Vivo x200 Pro is the winner.
Feel you have not put off beauti mode and vivid mode off while comparison
I too have both phones , In my pics the vivo makes more details on face , spot blemishes etc.
Galaxy a35 vs moto edge 50 neo 😊
vivo could have added 4k30 cinematic on the front camera I don't know why they are holding out on that feature.
Probably CPU couldn't keep up with processing to maintain 4k/30, even iphone sometimes lower fps if CPU can't keep up with processing.
@Patrick-vi9xr fps yes, but resolution? I think it's the camera. coz they are able to do it on the back cam, but not on the front.
I'm not an iPhone fan, but I prefer most of the photo and video output from the iPhone 16 PM. Also the camera bump on the vivo phone looks way too big and OTT. The designs of iPhones, Pixels and Samsung's are more subtle
Didn't you see the night video comparison...iphone cant compete with vivo..😅😅
That camera bump makes wireless charging a nightmare.
@@r.k.lalnunziraWhy all the fake hype?. The Vivo has bad stabilization on video (especially at 4K60) and it's low light zoom at 5x above is way too noisy and weak in detail. It's white balance tends to a green hue in dull weather conditions. And it's selfie camera is an embarrassment.
@@neilmcguinness4422 watch the night video comparison clearly
@@neilmcguinness4422 In this review was opposite, iphone white balance was off, in day light it showed blue snow, in night yellow snow, while vivo kept it white as it should be. Only selfie camera is worse, but for me personally is not an issue, I never use it.
Iphone has a lot of haters but it is still the best selling phone..people so hypocrites
I got backlashed too hehe
we are in the era of faking our lives on socialmidea.. thats y we prefer beautiful pictures...
Agree 💯
16 pro max videos still has the same problems from the 15 pro max the micro jitters
I definitely prefer the more contrasty look of the iPhone, the only real league the vivo has is really the zoom the selfie kinda sucks and everything else is really close
photo vivo
video iphone
Iphone only daytime video... Iphone night video is behind vivo
The video update of the vivo lately has a better stabilization closer with iphone if not better.
@@flinze2001It is still way behind the IPhone. DXo Mark claim that the best video quality is on the Pixel 9 Pro XL but ONLY using Video boost.
Vivo is better in videography
@Getquora No phone can shoot video better than the iPhone.
compare x200 pro and x8 pro pleasee..
Do check my comparison of findx8 pro and subscribe 😄
Well I'm not an Iphone fan but I liked it more 👍📱😊
Vivo not blurring the background in selfie portrait properly
As much as I want to hate the iphone but its just consistent, the Vivo has so many over exposed photos. May be because it was clicked on point and shoot and not focused on the subject before shooting? And the skin smoothness is something you just cant get rid of, coming from a vivo X100 pro. No amount of turning it off, vivid or textured mode etc, the skin is just not better than the iphone.
nope. no vivo at least for me. the contrast & vibrancy are too much. look unrealistic & fake. colors are different from actual. lack of details on potrait mode but the zoom lens is good.
Vivo is set to vivid mode by default. Other youtubers show the difference between vivid and natural mode. If the setting is changed, you´ll find the results extremely similar
Vivo is over hyped the front is brushed up and not good tbh but rear cameras are good but they are not optimized for social media and I don't they are better than what Samsung offered
40k price difference isn't justified though
@@Conquerer089People don't buy a phone just because of the camera performance. It depends more on the software or ecosystem you are in.
Exactly
@@AkoToMarjon truee
@@gkf3305 I do buy based on camera performance and vivo crushed the iPhone in those tests.
Video quality is better with Samsung and I phone .
Agree 💯
As a Vivo X100 Ultra user, the iPhone seemed better in almost everything. Video stability, quality, sound. Then the photo's looked better in colour and exposure. The Vivo did better in a few images, low light video and zoom of course.
And yet don't fall in one comparison video. Techmo already proved that x200 pro is superior to iphone 16 pro max. Also x200 pro is better than x100 ultra
Vivo was only better in lowlight video. The rest was better on iPhone.
Your iphone fans...this comparision not trusting...bias...
I wasn't. Trust me. 😉
You guys are delusional
Clearly you can see the x200 adding too much smoothness on the pictures making it look somehow fake
I got the chinese X200 Pro, I heard global is more toned down in smoothening
Happy me bro
Bro pahingi pamasko 😂
Happy New Year! 🎉
I honestly think ur a bit biased towards apple.🤨
I was objective from start fo finish 🤔
Sorry if i am wrong.i totally respect your perspective and i might have perceived it wrong .The reason i said that is because i recently got an upgrade from 13pro max to 16pro max and i had got a chance to compare my apple with a vivo x200pro which my friend had purchased lately. I felt a bit dissapointed spending 45% extra for my apple which doesnt serve the purpose or value for the amount paid.
I felt instant regret for my purchase because considering the fact that this phone is pretty damn cheap compared to an iphone i must say that phone crushed my apple in almost every other department.( i felt high end gaming to be a bit better in iphone though)
Vivo is half the price of iPhone
Yes sir! 👍
Vivo is better
👍👍👍
Gumanda asawa mu dre sa vivo
There is nothing natural about the iPhone pics
Well, colors are toned down. Not much beautification. I say less of what others do. 👍
Vivo takes better photos than IPhone, but the IPhone takes better video. The IPhone is the better overall device in terms of software and software optimization and gaming ability. Apple customer support is light years ahead of Vivo's also.
Gaming on iPhone? It starts to lag like 30mins in..
It's to bright on the night video
vivo kills the iphone 😮
😱😱😱
Vivo 😎
Iphone 🤡
Vivo white washing skin tones 😅
Oppo find x8
Hello brother can you help me give galaxy s24 fe phone gift for me please. I am long time follow your yt account. And I biggest fan you . Please can you help me. I am not afford smart phone my family backround is poor.
iphone is not natural it is faded or dull
It's at least not putting ok fake lipstick and makeup
Nah iPhone is definitely natural
iPhone skin colour is much better than Vivo