Satan deceives and makes people to sin by 1. Throat off bad people shed blood 2. Marry many women here in the name of helping them and get many in heaven 3. Go far place to Rotate around black stone
I respect the scholarly knowledge of Dr Ataie. However I don't rely on the views of any one scholar as being "crystal clear". I'm not trying to be judgemental. I'm simply acknowledging my own lack of understanding and acceptance of a scholar's interpretation. And no disrespect to you. In fact, I appreciate the honesty of Muslims ( as long as they are respectful to me ). I'm just a simple Christian believer. So the Truth about God ( and the Gospels of the New Testament ) does NOT depend on me ! I'm nobody special. Respectfully from Florida USA
@@maazbinhelalI'm okay but still having some health problems. Also I'm still struggling to understand Islam better. I've not read the Quran yet. I don't think doubts are necessarily bad but I can't "sit on the fence" forever. I don't want to reject God's love as demonstrated by Jesus' crucifixion. Anyhow, I don't recall your name. Did we communicate before ? Respectfully from Florida USA
Mr Paul, I would love to see you write a book about comparative theology Your channel is a goldmine of information, and your perspective is valuable. Regards.
I like how Paul of Blogging Theology listens to Dr. Ataie. Thats a good example for us ( especially me ) to follow. I'm not saying that I accept as truth everything that Dr Ataie says. I'm a simple Christian believer. Plus i think its important to listen and learn from various scholars. By the way, the Truth about God does NOT depend on me ! Thats why I try to respect Muslims and to be somewhat open-minded. Blessings and peace of God.
U are right But I hve a question why is it that christian holy books was authored by men and not divine revelation? Why God didnot Author ur holy book? How can we trust a book that was authored by men we want salvation ?!
@@Shabs2456 To be honest, I have not read the Quran yet. Yes I've been listening to Blogging Theology for over 2 years ! But I need to read the Quran myself and I should also visit a mosque and talk with an Islamic scholar. However, from just listening to the various videos on Blogging Theology, I don't think I know enough about Islam. In fact, some verses in the Quran confuse me ( such as those verses where Allah tells Muslims to accept the previous revelation given to the "People of the book" ). Also the verses which mention Jesus was not crucified don't seem to make sense because I can't understand exactly what those verses are saying. It's like the real message is hidden or obscured. Do I make any sense to you? Of course there are scriptures in the Gospels of the New Testament which also confuse me. So maybe it's ME ?? I appreciate your concern. Honestly, it's not good that I'm having doubts about Islam for such a long time! Right? I need to make a stand either way. I can't "sit on the fence" forever. Plus I'm getting old. Peace of God to you..
Throughout history the supposed recorded details have either been partially or completely censored. The production of a straight answer or recording without Allah Alhamdulilalla is impossible.
"Throughout history the supposed recorded details have either been partially or completely censored." People only censored the Bible. People did not censor any other book.
Asalamualaikum Wa Rahmatullah Bro Paul and Dr A 🫡 .I appreciate this collaboration . May I use audio clips from your videos to make points I want on live streams I am preparing for please????
But most significant, Jesus Christ can change my heart. It won't beat any differently, but if my heart makes room for God's mercy and forgiveness, I say a prayer of gratitude.
salam paul i was searching but your metaphysician new video seems to be private now I'm very very curious because i saw the thumbnail 😅😅 let us in on that please
Doing morphosemantic and etymological researches through hebrew, aramaic and arabic, I found that Jesus, Yashua' means Ya- Divin Sign, and Shua', the Hour, thus ساعة in the Qur'an, Judgment Day, terrible one. This was most of his preaches, and the Qur'an gives more informations about this Hour. The rabbinism still rejects Jesus and his preach.
In both Arabic and Syriac-Aramaic, "ya" (ياء) can serve as an exclamatory prefix, equivalent to "O" or "Ah" in English. In Arabic : "ya" is used as a vocative particle, indicating direct address or exclamation. Example: "Ya Allah" (يا الله) - "O Allah" In Syriac-Aramaic:_ "ya" or "yaw" (ܝܐ) is used as an exclamatory prefix, expressing surprise, emotion, or urgency. Example: "Ya Maran" (ܝܐ ܡܪܢ) - "O Lord" Hebrew Influence : Although Hebrew doesn't typically use "ya" as an exclamatory prefix, the influence of Aramaic and Arabic on Hebrew during the Second Temple period and beyond may have led to some overlap in usage. Implications for "Yasha" : Considering this, the name "Yasha" (ישע) could potentially be interpreted as "O Save!" or "Save now!", emphasizing the urgency or intensity of the salvation.
@@zainiabdullah621 Giving etymological precision : Ya in any prophet names is equivalent to Ayat in arabic. Ya-. The Ya you are taliking about is in arabic, it expresses intensity. In arabic, Ayat, Ya and Iyya have different used and meaning. But in hebrew and aramaic, Ya- prefixed to a noun, it's about Divin Intervention, like in Yahya (as), Allah gave Yahya as a Sign for his father Zaccharia (as) surah 19.8 to 10. Too long to bring here all the names starting with this morphem. And it is the jews and christians whom claimed ישע means "save" : Yahoshua' (Joshua) didn't save anything. In fact, Ishaea', Elishea', Yahoshua' and Yashua' carry all the etyma שע which the time passing, Time ساعة. The name of prophets are directly linked with their mission : Ishaea' announced the TIME to come, Yahoshua' is the Sign that the Time had come (take the land), Elisha' his TIME was announced. Studying the hebrew torah, I found many errors in the rabbinic interpretations of hebrew words, and get the point the torah was manipulated, they added some verses trying to explain prophet's name. Indeed the jews changed the meaning of many words, and a morphosemantic approach reveales it. About christians, they don't care God's word, even Jesus's words. The roman built new definitions in greek, many proves of that fact.
@@zainiabdullah621 What you are calling "Vocative", doesn't explain the meaning : YA ! It is something we have to pay extrem attention = Sign. Surah 1.5 : Iyyaka I had investigated about its meaning. Related to the Ya, this is morphosemantic investigation.
@@zainiabdullah621 It is not Yasha but ܝܫܘܥ see the و part of the root سوع like the arabic root. This is why Yahoshua' is not related to the root in Yashua', in case of Joshua' is a damma, not a full letter of the root. Get the point ?
How do we know Paul actually wrote everything in his gospels? Could it have been later church scribes who authored them to fit their trinitarian (or church) theology? i.e. they used the name of Paul? Just a thought.
I think his letters are carbon dated to his time and were in his historical location. That doesn't 100% prove he wrote them, but it makes it probable at best.
Read the Gospels in the language they were written in...Greek. "Son of man" can be "Son of andros". But "Andros" is also a Greek form of the name "Andrew". Note how many times "Jesus"(not his name) is referred to as "the man". Is this a proper translation? Or should it have been written as "Andros" or "Andrew"?
Are you sure the Greek defines "son of man" as "Son of Andros" ? I had never heard such a definition according to the Greek language. I thought "son of man" could be a synonym for "Son of Adam" or simply a human being ? Of course I could be wrong. I tried to study Biblical Greek but understanding it eluded me. Now I'm getting old. If my understanding of "son of man" is incorrect, I apologize. My scholarly ability is not always good. Respectfully from Florida USA
@@johnbrzykcy3076 "Jesus" was not who, or what, people today claim he was. Here's one. Read these 4 verses together... Book of Revelation. Ch11v8, Ch14v8, Ch17v9, Ch17v18.
@e.anderson2545 There are no such things as "prophets". I don't know what your explanation is, as you never said what you believe it is. But, the concepts of "Old" and "New" Testaments only start in 16th century. Up until then it was widely taken for granted that Christ lived BEFORE Moses, David, Solomon etc. When Isaiah or Daniel eg. speak of Christ they are not being "prophets", they are referring to something that happened in the past.
The Reliability of The Bible Evidence of Author's & Dates Written ︎ Matthew - A tax collector who became Jesus' apostle and wrote about the life of Jesus as the Messiah for the Jewish community c. 60 AD. ︎ Mark - A Jew, and a companion of Peter and Paul, who wrote for both Jews and Gentiles about Christ's death and resurrection c. 60 AD. ︎ Luke - A Gentile doctor, and a companion of Peter and Paul who wrote for the Gentiles about Christ the saviour for humankind. c. 60 AD ︎ Luke - also wrote the Acts of the Apostles c. 60 AD. ︎ John - The 'beloved' apostle of Jesus, wrote in his later years about the Word who took on Flesh (John 1:1,14) c. 80-90 AD. ︎ John - also wrote 3 Letters and The Book of Revelations c. 80-90 AD. ︎ James - Jesus' step-brother, wrote 1 letter c. 35 AD. ︎ Paul - wrote 13 letters c.49 - 65 AD. ︎ Jude - wrote 1 letter c. 65 AD. ︎ Peter - wrote 2 letters c. 67 AD. ︎ The author of The Letter to Hebrews is unknown c. 65 AD. (Wikipedia). ︎ Jesus Christ's' ministry occurred between 27-30 A.D. ︎ Christianity began after the Crucifixion and Resurrection of Jesus Christ when thousands of Jews became followers of 'The Way' (Jesus). ︎ The New Testament scholar, F.F. Bruce, gives strong historical evidence that the New Testament was completed by A.D. 100. ︎ Most writings of the New Testament were completed twenty to forty years before 100 AD. (Wikipedia). ︎ The apostles and their companions wrote the New Testament from their first-hand experiences with Jesus. New Testament integrity is supported by historians, biblical and textual scholars, along with thousands of early codices, manuscripts and the Dead Sea Scrolls, proving the validity and preservation of the Gospels written between c. 35-90 A.D (Eusebius, Church History 111. 39 .15; Irenaeus Against Heresies, 111.1) INTERNAL Evidence: ︎ The internal evidence supports these early dates for several reasons. The first three Gospels prophesied the fall of the Jerusalem Temple which occurred in A.D. 70. However, the fulfillment is not mentioned. It is strange that these three Gospels predict this major event but do not record it happening. Why do they not mention such an important prophetic milestone? The most plausible explanation is that it had not yet occurred at the time Matthew, Mark, and Luke were written. ︎ In the book of Acts, the Temple plays a central role in the nation of Israel. Luke writes as if the Temple is an important part of Jewish life. He also ends Acts on a strange note: Paul living under house arrest. It is strange that Luke does not record the death of his two chief characters, Peter and Paul. The most plausible reason for this is that Luke finished writing Acts before Peter and Paul's martyrdom in A.D. 64. A significant point to highlight is that the Gospel of Luke precedes Acts, further supporting the traditional dating of c. A.D. 60. Most scholars agree Mark precedes Luke, making Mark's Gospel even earlier. ︎ Finally, the majority of New Testament scholars believe that Paul's epistles are written from A.D. 48-60. Paul's outline of the life of Jesus matches that of the Gospels. 1 Corinthians is one of the least disputed books regarding its dating and Pauline authorship. In 1Corinthians chapter 15, Paul summarizes the gospel and reinforces the premise that this is the same gospel preached by the apostles. Paul quotes from Luke's Gospel in 1 Timothy 5:18, showing us that Luke's Gospel was indeed completed in Paul's lifetime. This would move the time of the completion of Luke's Gospel along with Mark and Matthew. This Internal Evidence presents a strong case for the early dating of the Gospels. EXTERNAL Evidence - Gospel Dates: ︎ Were the Gospels written by eyewitnesses of the events, or were they not recorded until centuries later? As with the internal evidence, the external evidence also supports a first century date. ︎ Fortunately, New Testament scholars have an enormous amount of ancient manuscript evidence. The documentary evidence for the New Testament far surpasses any other work of its time, with over 5000 manuscripts, and many are dated within a few years of their authors' lives. KEY documents: ︎ Chester Beatty Papyri contains most of the N.T. writings, and is dated around A.D. 250. ︎ The Bodmer Papyri contains most of John, and dates to A.D. 200. ︎ Rylands Papyri that was found in Egypt and contains large fragments of John, and dates to A.D. 130. From this fragment we can conclude that John was completed well before A.D. 130 because, not only did the gospel have to be written, it had to be hand copied and make its way down from Greece to Egypt. The majority of scholars agree that John is the last gospel written, so we can affirm its first century date along with the other three with greater assurance. EARLY New Testament Papyrus Manuscripts: ︎ Dead Sea Scrolls, the Full Text of Isaiah 53 and a portion of every book, c. 250 BC. ︎ Old Testament Greek Septuagint c. 200 BC. ︎ P52 (John Rylands Fragment) - John 18:31-33; 37-38 c. 96 AD ︎ P90 (Oxyrhynchus) - John 18:36; 19:7 c. 96 AD ︎ P104 (Oxyrhynchus) - Matthew 21:34-37, 43, 45 c. 60-65 AD ︎ P46 (Chester Beatty Papyrus) - Romans 5:17-6; 5-14; 8:15-25; 27-35; 10:1-11, 22, 24-33, 35; 16:1-23; 25-27. And Hebrews; 1 & 2; Corinthians; Ephesians; Galatians; Philippians; Colossians; 1 Thessalonians 1:1, 9-10; 2:1-3; 5:5-9, 23-28 c. 50’s-70’s AD ︎ P98 (IFAO) - Revelation 1:13; 2:1 c. 90 AD ︎ P66 (Bodmer Papyrus) - John 1:1-6,11; 6:35; 14:26; fragment of 14:29; 21:9 c. 70’s AD ︎ P67 Matthew 3:9, 15; 5:20-22; 25-28 c. 60-65 AD ︎ Evidence also comes from the Dead Sea Scrolls Cave 7. Jose Callahan discovered a large fragment of the Gospel of Mark and dated it to have been written in A.D. 50. Also large fragments of Acts and other epistles and dated them to have been written slightly after A.D. 50.4 Another line of evidence is the writings of the church fathers. ︎ CLEMENT of Rome sent a letter to the Corinthian church in A.D. 95. in which he quoted from the Gospels and other portions of the N.T. ︎ IGNATIUS, Bishop of Antioch, wrote a letter before his martyrdom in Rome in A.D. 115, quoting all the Gospels and other N.T. letters. ︎ POLYCARP wrote to the Philippians in A.D. 120 and quoted from the Gospels and N.T. letters. ︎ JUSTIN MARTYR, A.D. 150 quotes John 3. Church fathers of the early second century were familiar with the apostle's writings and quoted them as inspired Scripture. ︎ Early dating is important for two reasons. The closer a historical record is to the date of the event, the more likely the record is accurate. Early dating allows for eyewitnesses to still be alive when the Gospels were circulating to attest to their accuracy. The apostles often appeal to the witness of the hostile crowd, pointing to their knowledge of the facts as well (Acts 2:22, 26:26). Also, the time is too short for legends to develop. Historians agree it takes about two generations, or eighty years, for legendary accounts to establish themselves. From the evidence, we can conclude the Gospels were indeed written by the authors they are attributed to. THE First Fully Bound Bible Books/Codices ︎ Codex Vaticanus: Origin 1st century M/S - first Codex, 280 - 330 AD ︎ Codex Siniaticus: Origin 1st century M/S - first Codex, 300 - 350 AD ︎ Codex Alexandrius: Origin 1st century M/S - first Codex, 350 - 400 AD ︎ Codex Vulgate: Origin 1st century M/S - first Codex, 380 - 400 AD JESUS and the Jews were multilingual ︎ "Pilate had a notice prepared and fastened to the cross. It read: 'JESUS Of NAZARETH, THE KING Of THE JEWS'. Many of the Jews read this sign, for the place where Jesus was crucified was near the city, and the sign was written in Hebrew, Aramaic, Latin and Greek" (John 19:19-20) ︎ The Gospels were written in Koine Greek being the World's language in the 1st century The Hebrew Bible was translated into Greek (Septuagint) c.200 BC for the many Greek speaking Jews It is well known that first-century Jerusalem was inhabited by Greek speaking Jews who were at least bilingual. And Jesus most likely was trilingual apart from the ability to read minds. So the original Gospels were written in Koine Greek and sent throughout the World.. ︎ Jewish culture was heavily influenced by Hellenistic culture, and Koine Greek was used not only for international communication but also as the first language of many Jews. This development was furthered by the fact that the largest Jewish community in the world lived in Ptolemaic Alexandria. (Wikipedia) GOD Protects His Sacred Words: ︎ "But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let them be under God’s curse! As we have already said, so now I say again: If anybody is preaching to you a gospel other than what you accepted, let them be under God’s curse!" (Galatians 1:8-9). ︎ Jesus said, "Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away" (Matt 24:35). ︎ God protects His Word & Gospels and warns of antichrists. (1John2:22). ︎ Christ's Good News of Salvation, His Birth, Crucifixion and Resurrection hasn't changed for 2000 years. ︎ The Gospels are evidenced by internal and external historical, archeological & literary facts. ︎ The Gospels are reliable and transparent with any variations transparently referenced in the footnotes. ︎ The Gospels have 1000 times more manuscripts than the most documented ancient literature by Greco-Roman historian, Suetonius. ︎ Bible is the most comprehensive and reliable source re. 1st century Jerusalem history & used by archaeologists supporting research today.. Hallelujah.
they have to do what they have to do bro, if thier own sources acknowledge John Peter Paul, you have centuries of textual criticism proving unequalled manuscripts attestation in the thousands , with thousands of scribes transmissiting the text in different centuries and different geographical areas and archaeological evidence for older manuscripts being used for newer transmission and have the incredible odds of 99% and above agreement in all the text against all that textual dissection , he even has to deceive the audience as if the quranic content wasn't available before muhammed leave alone testing the quran with the same textual and transmission examination given to the Bible by secular Liberal Jewish and Christian scholarship
The Jews and Christians have committed extremes against Jesus. that’s why Islam had to restore balance and rationality. The Jews rejected Jesus altogether. The Christians made him God. Only the Muslims did justice to Jesus by giving him his rightful position ie one of the greatest Prophets of God ❤
Sir I can suggest maybe you document your videos and media on different platforms because of the fear of loss. I can suggest Telegram, Instagram and maybe Tiktok. Best wishes always! You have a fantastic channel!
Lucifer whispered to Paul, so they can continue on with Worldly adventures and Sin, there going to heaven anyway. This argument about Jesus is actually invalid as God says in Ali Imran 3-19 that Islam is the belief for humankind.
@@tomceman4451 Jesus led never an army while Moses and Muhammad did. Jesus never led his people on an exodus while Moses and Muhammad did. Jesus never married, while Moses and Muhammad did. Jesus never had children while Moses and Muhammad did. Jesus was raised by his mother while Moses and Muhammad were not. Jesus was sent to fulfill the law, while Moses and Muhammad were sent with new laws. Jesus never grew old, while Moses and Muhammad did. Jesus never judged and sentenced a criminal while Moses and Muhammad did. The list goes on and on. You are just repeating what the pastor told you. Look at the passage with some critical thinking.
@@andrewpalim1978Jesus saved the Soul from Hell(Hades) like Moses saved the Israelites from Egypt Jesus was a member of the family of Abraham Isaac and Jacob like Moses was a member of the family of Abraham Isaac and Jacob. Moses had anointing like Jesus had Anointing Jesus does the will of God and Moses does the will of God Jesus said to keep the commendement like Moses said to keep the commendement And Both at them don't allow Child marriage Muhammad never does the will of God, Muhammad never said to keep the commendement Muhammad is like a Prophet of Joseph Smith
Well, lots of claims about Jesus made by skimming the surface. Jesus’ message was the Kingdom of God creating a better world of peace and happiness. Please demonstrate how this has been improved upon by Islam. Thanks
Islam did not change the message or improve upon it. All the prophets came with the same message: The reality that there is only One God. Islam is the final message, which corrects the contradictions and errors in the previous scriptures. Laws may change from Prophet to Prophet, such as how and when to pray, fast, sacrifice, and make alms; but facts of reality do not change, such as there is One God, who created heaven, hell, angels, and devils, and sent messengers with holy books to guide mankind in the quest to know God.
I respect Dr Ataie and Muslims too. I do agree with you that "Jesus' message was the Kingdom of God creating a better world of peace..." I don't really see that better world in our present-day world. But my observations don't negate Jesus' teachings and God's plan of salvation and peace. Because Truth about Jesus doesn't depend on me! I'm just a simple Christian believer. Only God is all-knowing. Respectfully...
Islam ( Submission to The One Eternal , Transcendental , Universal All Creator Alone Worthy of Worship , Unto Whom All Belong & All Return to account ) has Always been the message , conveyed by all the prophets Adam , Noah , Abraham , Moses , Jesus & Finally The Final Messenger , Peace Upon All ,
“For the Son of Man is to come with his angels in the glory of his Father, and then he will repay everyone for what has been done. Truly I tell you, there are some standing here who will not taste death before they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom.” Matthew 16:27-28 In his own words, Jesus will not taste death before he sees “the son of man” and his kingdom. Jesus is foretelling events to occur in two different eras: the first millennium (the day on which the prophecy starts to realize) and the third millennium (the third day, witnessing the fulfillment of prophecy). Jesus is promising a redemption to be fulfilled through two different comings or individuals: Imam Husayn who will be killed to fill earth with atonement and Imam Mahdi who will be raised to fill earth with justice. “But do not ignore this one fact, beloved, that with the Lord one day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like one day.” 2 Peter 3:8
The authors of what is written are the Authority of their words! The fact that no actual book written by jesus( which is not even his correct name) exists, proves the new testament was not authorised by him! Even if he was the real speaker of those parables, they are all coming from second or even third hand sources, not from the true Author! If he did once write a gospel, we dont have it!
Respectfully, I tend to disagree with you. Are you making the implication that since we have "no actual book written by Jesus", that the present-day Gospels are not authentic teachings of Jesus? I myself don't believe Jesus ever wrote a gospel or a book. I could be wrong. From my understanding, Muslims do believe that Jesus Christ did write a book called the "Injeel". If I understand incorrectly, would a Muslim let me know. I'm a simple Christian believer who stands upon the foundational aspects of Christianity, which are Jesus' incarnation, crucifixion and resurrection. However I try to respect Muslims. In fact, the truth about Jesus doesn't depend on me ! I'm nobody special. Only God is all-knowing. Respectfully from Florida USA
@johnbrzykcy3076 yes I'm saying at least 50 percent of the new testament is fake and 100 percent of it was not written by him! Neither was jesus his real name! Christi-anity is a fake made up religion part Roman pagan God man, mixed in with old testament traditions!
@@ohfft I respect your views but I can't accept the truth that Christianity is based upon pagan ideology. Is that what you're saying? I believe in a loving God and Jesus Christ Himself was the ultimate example of God's love for us. No disrespect intended to you. For the most inspirational teachings by Jesus, read his parables of The Good Samaritan and The Prodigal Son ! Wow ! If only we could follow such wonderful examples. Respectfully from Florida USA
@johnbrzykcy3076 Sure can believe he was a great servant of God, or a pure example of how humans and humanity should be! But to declare he was God or a part of God, is nothing other than paganism! Just like pagan Romans believed those who reached a level of popularity and power were gods!
I AM senth to release keys to unlock A Book. Please refrain from associating old text of unknown origin with our current [electric] work. We invite humans to electrify this current civilization. Assalamualaikum
Scientific error in Qur'an. 1. God created whole universe in 6 days ( 6000 years) while Scientific discovery shows it took atleast 13.7 billion years 2. Earth is flat according to islamic science. 😂😂
@@arnoldjackson-q2jit is 6 epochs, not earth days LMAO and you believe God rested on the 7th. You are the one who actually believes in 6 earth days but throwing your belief onto us. Majority of our midieval scholars believed the earth was round, ibn taymiyyah said it was an ijmah meaning consensus based on the Quran and sunnah. You failed.
@@WeAreGhuraba 1. Why epoch, say EON! Qur'an 47:22, clearly says God's 1 day is equal to 1000 years of human counting. 2. It doesn't matter ,what they believed. We are talking about a book which claimed to be Word of God. It should provide true information. 3. God rested on 7 th days is a figure of speech, means he finished his creative work on earth Go take some English grammar classes.😆
@@arnoldjackson-q2j Yet another verse in a different context shows 50,000 years, so different context comes out to different measurements. Days here is more properly translated as stages, eras or epochs.
KING = notification from enlightment of current [electric] giving with numerous by LIBRARY. Self explanatory. Library and electricity. Not a physical 'king' 🤭
Basil antus. Colourful from chrominance activation with intelligent from affirm signal by linking from current of perform activation with Gift from The One numerous by utilize of SIGNAL
When Mathew and Luke use Mark word for word in some instance and not others, it shows that they have no alternative sources of their own, while at the same time they do not consider Mark authoritative or divinely inspired. In other words, based on Christian's own views, the Gospels are not reliable.
@@arbitScaleModelsi appreciate your kind response and your honesty. I have no desire to judge Muslims. ( Unfortunately, as fallen human beings, we seemingly think we are always correct in our judgements ). I'm just a simple Christian believer. So the truth doesn't depend on me ! Again, no problem with your comments. In fact, I like your response. Peace of God to you and your family
@@arbitScaleModelsI appreciate your advice. And yes I like to listen to various scholars ( both Christian and Muslim ). Yes I do need to understand better the beliefs of James, the brother of Jesus. Does the Quran mention "James" specifically? Respectfully from Florida USA.
It's quite amusing and very desperate to see certain christians here maniacally diverting the topic because they can't defend their corrupted religion. May Allah reward these two brothers and guide us and many to Islam.
I'm a simple Christian believer but I'm curious. What do you mean by Christians "can't defend their corrupted religion"? By the way, no disrespect intended. And I'm not looking for confrontation. I'm trying to understand Islam better. Peace of God to you...
@@hajarislam2917 I appreciate your response but are you making the implication that all of Christianity is "corrupted" ? Anyhow, I myself can't "defend" various doctrines of Christianity. So that's why I try to bring up a different "topic" related to the truth about Jesus Christ. Of course my views and beliefs may be wrong. Because I'm not infallible. I still stand on the foundational aspects of Christianity which point to God's love for us. These foundational beliefs are the incarnation of Jesus, His crucifixion and His resurrection. Of course the truth about Jesus ( and God ! ) doesn't depend on me. I'm nobody special. But I do try to respect Muslims. Respectfully from Florida USA
@@johnbrzykcy3076 yes, christianity as it is today, is factual corrupted, because its teachings come from a corrupted source. The bible. This is attested by enough biblical scholars. Follow this channel and listen to/watch the content and you will come across many proofs for this coming from different reliable scholarly sources. Bye.
@@hajarislam2917But Allah confirmed Torah and gospel so you say Allah is a liar? Well…I agree with you… Allah promised to protect Torah, gospel and Quran…and failed miserably. And this is your god? Wake up soon! Time is running up!
If you read the bible and understand correctly you will find that there is a few different jesus there.Whoever wrote the bible didn't realise that we will find all the mistakes they made
Respectfully, what do you mean by "you will find that there is a few different Jesus" in the Bible? I'm just curious what you mean. No disrespect intended to you. I'm just a simple Christian believer. Respectfully from Florida USA
From my understanding, doesn't the phrase "son of man" simply refer to "human being" ? So could it be that Jesus often considered His own humanity? So using the phrase "son of man" in reference to prophet Muhammad is an implication that Muhammad was a human being. No disrespect to Muslims. However in Jesus' situation, He is also given other titles in the Gospels of the New Testament. Such as "Lord", "Son of the Living God", "teacher", "the Good Shepherd", "The Word" ( Logos in Greek ) and more ! I think we certainly need to consider these other titles given to Jesus in correlation to the title "son of man". What do Muslims think? By the way, the truth regarding Jesus' identity doesn't depend on me ! It depends on God Himself. What God ( Allah ) says about Jesus in the Gospels. I only mention the Gospels because I'm not very familiar with the Quran. From my understanding, the Quran itself doesn't say much about Jesus. Is that correct? By the way, I'm learning slowly about Islam. I have no desire to disrespect Muslims but I also dislike confrontation. I'm getting old so I prefer to listen carefully. Also, I respect the scholarly knowledge of Dr Ataie ( although I usually like to listen to various scholars, both Christian and Muslim ). Has Dr Ataie written any books? Respectfully from Florida USA. Peace to both Muslims and Christians.
@@WeAreGhuraba I appreciate your honesty. I don't know anything about Unitarians so I need to get information. Yes I agree that people tend to interpret scriptures in different ways. That's why I must try to be respectful to people, although I may see things differently. By the way, what's your understanding of Islam and the Quran? Peace to you...
The reason why Christianity is so full of contradictions is because the christians want all the titles and prophecies for Jesus A.S. It can't work if the son of god refers to himself as the son of man. They say jesus is the prophet like Moses A.S. So Moses is also a son of god now? Comparing your god to a prophet is ludicrous. But here we are because he has to be in that prophecy aswell. The hoops you have to jump through to believe your god offed hismelf for your sins...
Bro even in Isaiah 42, they say that the servant is Jesus while it clearly says where kedar lived. Their gos was called servant,prophet,son of man but never god
When it was reveled the gospels orgionally were accurate..its when scribes started changing the text adding verses taking verses out etc then it became corrupted
The NT GOSPELS - Evidence of Author's & Dates Written ▪︎ Matthew - A tax collector who became Jesus' apostle and wrote about the life of Jesus as the Messiah for the Jewish community c. 60 AD. ▪︎ Mark - A Jew, and a companion of Peter and Paul, who wrote for both Jews and Gentiles about Christ's death and resurrection c. 60 AD. ▪︎ Luke - A Gentile doctor, and a companion of Peter and Paul who wrote for the Gentiles about Christ the saviour for humankind. c. 60 AD ▪︎ Luke - also wrote the Acts of the Apostles c. 60 AD. ▪︎ John - The 'beloved' apostle of Jesus, wrote in his later years about the Word who took on Flesh (John 1:1,14) c. 80-90 AD. ▪︎ John - also wrote 3 Letters and The Book of Revelations c. 80-90 AD. ▪︎ James - Jesus' step-brother, wrote 1 letter c. 35 AD. ▪︎ Paul - wrote 13 letters c.49 - 65 AD. ▪︎ Jude - wrote 1 letter c. 65 AD. ▪︎ Peter - wrote 2 letters c. 67 AD. ▪︎ The author of The Letter to Hebrews is unknown c. 65 AD. (Wikipedia). ▪︎ Jesus Christ's' ministry occurred between 27-30 A.D. ▪︎ Christianity began after the Crucifixion and Resurrection of Jesus Christ when thousands of Jews became followers of 'The Way' (Jesus). ▪︎ The New Testament scholar, F.F. Bruce, gives strong historical evidence that the New Testament was completed by A.D. 100. ▪︎ Most writings of the New Testament were completed twenty to forty years before 100 AD. (Wikipedia). ▪︎ The apostles and their companions wrote the New Testament from their first-hand experiences with Jesus. New Testament integrity is supported by historians, biblical and textual scholars, along with thousands of early codices, manuscripts and the Dead Sea Scrolls, proving the validity and preservation of the Gospels written between c. 35-90 A.D (Eusebius, Church History 111. 39 .15; Irenaeus Against Heresies, 111.1) INTERNAL Evidence: ▪︎ The internal evidence supports these early dates for several reasons. The first three Gospels prophesied the fall of the Jerusalem Temple which occurred in A.D. 70. However, the fulfillment is not mentioned. It is strange that these three Gospels predict this major event but do not record it happening. Why do they not mention such an important prophetic milestone? The most plausible explanation is that it had not yet occurred at the time Matthew, Mark, and Luke were written. ▪︎ In the book of Acts, the Temple plays a central role in the nation of Israel. Luke writes as if the Temple is an important part of Jewish life. He also ends Acts on a strange note: Paul living under house arrest. It is strange that Luke does not record the death of his two chief characters, Peter and Paul. The most plausible reason for this is that Luke finished writing Acts before Peter and Paul's martyrdom in A.D. 64. A significant point to highlight is that the Gospel of Luke precedes Acts, further supporting the traditional dating of c. A.D. 60. Most scholars agree Mark precedes Luke, making Mark's Gospel even earlier. ▪︎ Finally, the majority of New Testament scholars believe that Paul's epistles are written from A.D. 48-60. Paul's outline of the life of Jesus matches that of the Gospels. 1 Corinthians is one of the least disputed books regarding its dating and Pauline authorship. In 1Corinthians chapter 15, Paul summarizes the gospel and reinforces the premise that this is the same gospel preached by the apostles. Paul quotes from Luke's Gospel in 1 Timothy 5:18, showing us that Luke's Gospel was indeed completed in Paul's lifetime. This would move the time of the completion of Luke's Gospel along with Mark and Matthew. This Internal Evidence presents a strong case for the early dating of the Gospels. EXTERNAL Evidence - Gospel Dates: ▪︎ Were the Gospels written by eyewitnesses of the events, or were they not recorded until centuries later? As with the internal evidence, the external evidence also supports a first century date. ▪︎ Fortunately, New Testament scholars have an enormous amount of ancient manuscript evidence. The documentary evidence for the New Testament far surpasses any other work of its time, with over 5000 manuscripts, and many are dated within a few years of their authors' lives. KEY documents: ▪︎ Chester Beatty Papyri contains most of the N.T. writings, and is dated around A.D. 250. ▪︎ The Bodmer Papyri contains most of John, and dates to A.D. 200. ▪︎ Rylands Papyri that was found in Egypt and contains large fragments of John, and dates to A.D. 130. From this fragment we can conclude that John was completed well before A.D. 130 because, not only did the gospel have to be written, it had to be hand copied and make its way down from Greece to Egypt. The majority of scholars agree that John is the last gospel written, so we can affirm its first century date along with the other three with greater assurance. EARLY New Testament Papyrus Manuscripts: ▪︎ Dead Sea Scrolls, the Full Text of Isaiah 53 and a portion of every book, c. 250 BC. ▪︎ Old Testament Greek Septuagint c. 200 BC. ▪︎ P52 (John Rylands Fragment) - John 18:31-33; 37-38 c. 96 AD ▪︎ P90 (Oxyrhynchus) - John 18:36; 19:7 c. 96 AD ▪︎ P104 (Oxyrhynchus) - Matthew 21:34-37, 43, 45 c. 60-65 AD ▪︎ P46 (Chester Beatty Papyrus) - Romans 5:17-6; 5-14; 8:15-25; 27-35; 10:1-11, 22, 24-33, 35; 16:1-23; 25-27. And Hebrews; 1 & 2; Corinthians; Ephesians; Galatians; Philippians; Colossians; 1 Thessalonians 1:1, 9-10; 2:1-3; 5:5-9, 23-28 c. 50’s-70’s AD ▪︎ P98 (IFAO) - Revelation 1:13; 2:1 c. 90 AD ▪︎ P66 (Bodmer Papyrus) - John 1:1-6,11; 6:35; 14:26; fragment of 14:29; 21:9 c. 70’s AD ▪︎ P67 Matthew 3:9, 15; 5:20-22; 25-28 c. 60-65 AD ▪︎ Evidence also comes from the Dead Sea Scrolls Cave 7. Jose Callahan discovered a large fragment of the Gospel of Mark and dated it to have been written in A.D. 50. Also large fragments of Acts and other epistles and dated them to have been written slightly after A.D. 50.4 Another line of evidence is the writings of the church fathers. ▪︎ CLEMENT of Rome sent a letter to the Corinthian church in A.D. 95. in which he quoted from the Gospels and other portions of the N.T. ▪︎ IGNATIUS, Bishop of Antioch, wrote a letter before his martyrdom in Rome in A.D. 115, quoting all the Gospels and other N.T. letters. ▪︎ POLYCARP wrote to the Philippians in A.D. 120 and quoted from the Gospels and N.T. letters. ▪︎ JUSTIN MARTYR, A.D. 150 quotes John 3. Church fathers of the early second century were familiar with the apostle's writings and quoted them as inspired Scripture. ▪︎ Early dating is important for two reasons. The closer a historical record is to the date of the event, the more likely the record is accurate. Early dating allows for eyewitnesses to still be alive when the Gospels were circulating to attest to their accuracy. The apostles often appeal to the witness of the hostile crowd, pointing to their knowledge of the facts as well (Acts 2:22, 26:26). Also, the time is too short for legends to develop. Historians agree it takes about two generations, or eighty years, for legendary accounts to establish themselves. From the evidence, we can conclude the Gospels were indeed written by the authors they are attributed to. THE First Fully Bound Bible Books/Codices ▪︎ Codex Vaticanus: Origin 1st century M/S - first Codex, 280 - 330 AD ▪︎ Codex Siniaticus: Origin 1st century M/S - first Codex, 300 - 350 AD ▪︎ Codex Alexandrius: Origin 1st century M/S - first Codex, 350 - 400 AD ▪︎ Codex Vulgate: Origin 1st century M/S - first Codex, 380 - 400 AD JESUS and the Jews were multilingual ▪︎ "Pilate had a notice prepared and fastened to the cross. It read: 'JESUS Of NAZARETH, THE KING Of THE JEWS'. Many of the Jews read this sign, for the place where Jesus was crucified was near the city, and the sign was written in Hebrew, Aramaic, Latin and Greek" (John 19:19-20) ▪︎ The Gospels were written in Koine Greek being the World's language in the 1st century The Hebrew Bible was translated into Greek (Septuagint) c.200 BC for the many Greek speaking Jews It is well known that first-century Jerusalem was inhabited by Greek speaking Jews who were at least bilingual. And Jesus most likely was trilingual apart from the ability to read minds. So the original Gospels were written in Koine Greek and sent throughout the World.. ▪︎ Jewish culture was heavily influenced by Hellenistic culture, and Koine Greek was used not only for international communication but also as the first language of many Jews. This development was furthered by the fact that the largest Jewish community in the world lived in Ptolemaic Alexandria. (Wikipedia) GOD Protects His Sacred Words: ▪︎ "But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let them be under God’s curse! As we have already said, so now I say again: If anybody is preaching to you a gospel other than what you accepted, let them be under God’s curse!" (Galatians 1:8-9). ▪︎ Jesus said, "Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away" (Matt 24:35). ▪︎ God protects His Word & Gospels and warns of antichrists. (1John2:22). ▪︎ Christ's Good News of Salvation, His Birth, Crucifixion and Resurrection hasn't changed for 2000 years. ▪︎ The Gospels are evidenced by internal and external historical, archeological & literary facts. ▪︎ The Gospels are reliable and transparent with any variations transparently referenced in the footnotes. ▪︎ The Gospels have 1000 times more manuscripts than the most documented ancient literature by Greco-Roman historian, Suetonius. ▪︎ Bible is the most comprehensive and reliable source re. 1st century Jerusalem history & used by archaeologists supporting research today.. Hallelujah......
IT WAS ABSOLUTELY DEBUNKED BY BART ERHMAN,,, THEY WEREN'T JESUS DISCIPLES & NO EYEWITNESSES,,,, ITS WRITTEN. 60-80 YEARS AFTER JESUS DIED,,,, ( YOUR VERSIONS ),,,,, ruclips.net/video/3JEiFo0LbjI/видео.htmlsi=v66XPd5WLsGgzumm
Because of the historical accuracy Jesus was able to perform miracles, raise the dead and heal the blind...IT SHOWS THAT HISTORICAL ACCURACY HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ESTABLISHING FAITH IN JESUS CHRIST
More lies and misreading of scripture from Dr Ataie and Paul Williams. Jesus quotes Psalm 22, and this clearly speaks about the crucifixion of the Suffering Servant. Daniel 7:13,14 is about the resurrection of the Son of man. This is consistent with the message of all the Gospels. To suggest that Jesus ascended to heaven without first dying is to suggest that flesh and blood can inherit the kingdom of God. What nonsense! All this is being spouted by Muslim apologists who don't even know that God is Spirit! Don't get sucked in by these lies.
Most scholars don't find it convincing, and your dependency is on a mistranslation anyways. He prayed to be saved only to be put on the cross anyways yelling about being forsaken, with an earlier reading saying he was mocked! he would not recite words of unbelief over inspiring words.
@@WeAreGhuraba You clearly don't know the scriptures. Psalm 22 was written by David nearly a thousand years before the birth of Jesus. By quoting the first verse of Psalm 22, Jesus was encouraging his listeners to look up the Psalm and understand its message. Jewish rabbis did not fully understand this Psalm, and it needed Jesus dying on the cross to reveal its true meaning. This is another reason for believing the Gospels, because no disciple of Jesus could have made this up! Only the Messiah, the true spirit of prophecy, could have known the meaning of this Psalm. Have you read Psalm 22? Do you realise that God did not forsake his Son? Why do you think Psalm 23 talks about resurrection, and Psalm 24 about ascension?
Terrible arguments Ali Alitae! Daniel 7:13-14 explicitly identifies that a human would: Gain access to the Ancient of Days, would be given rulership, honor, and a kingdom, that the peoples, nations, and language groups should all serve him. Jesus claimed over and over that he would be given a kingdom, which was heavenly, and which would have no end. In fact, he called himself the “son of man” through the Gospel accounts. To argue that his disciples called him, as opposed to Jesus calling himself the “son of man”, is laughable because your own scripture vouches for the authenticity of the Gospel accounts we have today. You cannot have your cake, and expect to eat it too.
Muhammad never saw uthmanic codex. Just buried islam. Prove that Muhammad saw a manuscript. Even if he saw, he was illiterate. BTW who wrote the Islamic injeel, anyone piece of injeel. Did isa saw the injeel? Bukhari never visited mecca. Keep on burying islam.
When you learn how to make arguments and understand them, then you can come try again. Jesus never preached a biography of himself, Quran is the actual words of God the prophet recited, that is the difference.
@@WeAreGhuraba u took a detour of a 1000 miles from my points and address something else it looks funny. Anyway I ll follow ur path. Jesus never preached a biography of himself, ok. So what?? But whatever was preached , was written by his apostles. What about your Islamic injeel , was it written down, what is the contents ? Is it what Isa preached? Next about the quran, well you claim or believe it was from God. U can believe that all u want. In the quran revealed by Allah, why do you find mentions of Muhammad s life like 33:6, 33:37, 33:50, 33:53, surah 66:1, surah 9, surah regarding Abu Lahab and many more. Is it not incidents from Muhammad s life. Did Allah reveal Muhammad s biography to Muhammad. Did Muhammad teach his followers his own life incidents as revelation. U have an answer??
@@Jeezkv This is the second time now where you make a bad argument, I respond with arguments on topic and respond back with an accusation of not understanding or "making a detour". Do you not see how bad your arguments are? It's evidence you don't understand what people are saying.
@@Jeezkv Mark wasn't an apostle, Matthew and Luke copied from Mark, John came last and differs greatly from the previous 3 gospels. None of them are first hand witness accounts and none of them claim to be, nor do they claim it's divine inspiration. The gospel accounts were named only in the 2nd century and come 60-100 years after Jesus was gone with the full manuscripts being only in the 4th century. Quran came 6th century and was mass transmitted through memorization by hundreds and thousands of companions, today in the 10s of millions. It was also written down, it was transmitted in two ways and available to everyone but the layman was not allowed to read the Bible without the churches authority and only accessible to the elite.
@@Jeezkv Do you even know what a biography is? The gospel themselves describe it as the life and teachings of Jesus. Quran addressed and answered questions and situations live when they happened. Learn what a biography is first.
i can not begin to understand how some people believe in the lies of the Quran, the Bible is truth because we have many Prophets who walked with Jesus and who testify about Jesus. But Muhammad came seven hundred years after Jesus. But with Muhammad, one has to take his word only, because there is no other prove ,that he met an Angel in a cave. So this is a bit like? this other story in the Quran that says that Muhammad, he flew on a donkey from Medina to Jerusalem? and the only witness was the donkey. So how can one believe the testimony of one man. No way
Regarding Islam, I'm slowly learning about the beliefs of Muslims. And I've never read the Quran, although I've been listening to Blogging Theology for over 2 years. But I'm aware of some of the Quranic verses. Anyhow, I'm just a simple Christian believer. I still stand on the foundational aspects of Christianity which are the Incarnation of Jesus, His crucifixion and His resurrection. But since I'm not infallible, the truth about Jesus doesn't depend on me ! Only God is all-knowing. So I try to respect Muslims and listen carefully. By the way, I'm not trying to negate your views. Have you read the Quran? Respectfully from Florida USA God bless...
@@johnbrzykcy3076 yes i have? and it contradicts everything with what the Bible says. And one can not have one foot on the Bible, and one foot on the Quran, because your salvation is at stake. And by the way i respect the Muslims as well, but not their false religion. God bless brother
I mean look how silly your line of questioning is, unlike you, the very disciples of prophet Muhammad conquered the world, that is how relevant and real they were. You on the other hand don't have a single primary witness to any event, and the gospels themselves were only given a name in the 2nd century. Witnesses is not the important thing, it is the message and which makes more sense. Stop worshipping human beings and come back to worshipping the Creator alone.
@@thetruth871 I appreciate your honesty. Please keep me in prayer because I feel like I've been "sitting on the fence" for too long. I need to have more discipline and a stronger faith in what Jesus accomplished for me on the cross. God bless you and your family Respectfully from Florida USA
The Son of Man in Daniel 7 reigns over all nations for eternity and is worshipped by all. This is clearly Jesus Christ at his second coming. This is what it means to be the Messiah Son of God. You are just contradicting the Bible for no reason other than what you want to be true.
Wrong. The figure in Daniel 7 is described as “one LIKE, A son of man” - i.e. a human-like figure (bar enash in Aramaic). Nothing to do with an actual title, but a description. Moreover, the son of man figure APPROACHES the “Ancient of Days” who is God. Thus he himself cannot be God. Additionally, he is GIVEN kingdom & glory, whereas God owns it from eternity past. Finally, you fail to actually read the interpretation of the vision given by the Angel to Daniel himself-which is that the glorified figure he saw represented the “SAINTS OF THE MOST HIGH” (i.e. the righteous believers-plural-who would stay on the side of God & follow His law till the end). Christians like yourself ignore these blatant & obvious facts in order to promote what the Church has taught you. But as the Qur’an aptly says: _”And when they are told, ‘Follow what God has revealed!’ they say, ‘No, we will instead follow what we found our ancestors upon!’ - Yet what if their ancestors never thought through anything, nor were on the right direction?”_ ~ _The Qur’an 2:170_ I pray that you repent & serve God alone-who is both Christ’s Lord and your Lord. _”The MOST important commandment is this,” Jesus answered: “Hear O Israel! The Lord our God, the Lord is ONE!”_ ~ The Gospel of Mark 12:29
@@agp4580 No, don’t tell him to shut up. Speak to people with respect brother. This is what the Qur’an teaches us: “Invite to the way of your Lord with wisdom and good advice, and debate with them in the most polite & dignified manner.” ~ Qur’an 16:125 Peace.
@@celestialknight2339 I’ve talked to this guy before many times and have corrected him many times. He chooses to be delusional and thicker than a brick wall. He comments on every single Islamic post religiously. He doesn’t deserve actual replies, dismissing his comments is more effective.
@@agp4580 exasperation & frustration lead us humans to speak unwisely , yet still The Final Messenger on Whom is Peace was Himself confronted with worse types , yet Allaah SwTA Counsels The Messenger Himself , & therefore us too , that after we have exerted ourselves in inviting to Al Islam with courtesy & wisdom & reason then when the wilfully arrogant ,stubborn & wilfully ignorant persist , then we say Peace & move on , leave them to their ways
Paul, what are you doing making Dr. Ali broadcast from an alleyway? 5:68. The Torah and Injeel were preserved in Muhammad's day. Either that or Allah would have no reason to exhort Jews and Christians to follow their own scriptures. So it seems that either Dr.Ali is confused, or the Qur'an is wrong. Or perhaps could you explain what 5:68 is supposed to mean if both Torah and Injeel are both corrupted.
I appreciate your honesty but what exactly do you think the "Injeel" was ? It seems like Muslims have a different idea regarding the "Injeel". I could be wrong because I'm not Muslim. I'm a simple Christian believer. Again, I appreciate your comments. God bless...
@@johnbrzykcy3076 The Injeel and Gospel are synonymous, according to the earliest Islamic understanding. However, the Qur'an treats all things as "books", and since the Christian Gospel was, and is, understood to be contained in the New Testament, it's reasonable to say that the NT is the Injeel written down. This is the implication of 5:68 - if Christians are supposed to stand on the Injeel/Gospel, then they should have it to hand. Which they did. But the narrative that the Bible has been corrupted contradicts this, which causes problems.
@@mikehutton3937 I appreciate your clarification. I've heard various interpretations of the "Injeel" from different Muslims so I'm still confused. But such is life. Most important to me is listening to and following Jesus' example as demonstrated in the Gospels. I think God understands our hearts and our doubts. God bless you and your family.
Ali Atai never care to question the historicity or authority of gospel, because you did. So you just rejected Allah s knowledge who confirms the gospel which was with the Christians during the 7th century. I want to you to just refute Allah daily like this
@@WeAreGhuraba I dont believe anything in the quran. U believe in it, so u can't claim previous scriptures are not reliable. Atleast understand what is the point being made here
@@Jeezkv clearly you don't understand the argument, it is a self inflicted own, in depending on this straw man argument we don't believe, you end up creating your own dilemma, it is basic logical followup, try keeping up.
Hahaha! You quibble about the historical accuracy of the Gospels but believe the Quran which teaches that the sun sets in a muddy puddle. Soooo accurate. Even Paul Williams believes it. - Quran 18:83-86-"And they ask you about Dhul-Qarnain. Say: “I shall recite to you something of his story.” Verily, We established him in the earth, and We gave him the means of everything. So he followed a way. Until, when he reached the setting place of the sun, he found it setting in a spring of black muddy (or hot) water. And he found near it a people." This is indisputably confirmed by Sunan Abu Dawud 3991-"Abu Dharr said: I was sitting behind the Apostle of Allah who was riding a donkey while the sun was setting. He asked: Do you know where this sets? I replied: Allah and his Apostle know best. He said: It sets in a spring of warm water." "Allah and his Apostle know best" - oh yes they know. I think you need to get your own foundationless house in order before you quibble about others.
Dr Ali why do you think that "The Mad Mamluks" deleted episode 137? Why are you comparing apples and pears with "al Fatiha" and "Matthew"? One is supposedly the *dictated* "word of God" and the other the "inspired word of 'God'" written after the fact, I thought you were better than that! What happened to the idea that the "Gospels" could have "revealed" in Greek? I stopped listening at around @4:25 as you struck me as being as dishonest as !
Br Paul, kindly burden Dr. ALI with more long podcast less he die with his knowledge. The world need his knowledge
Isn't this from old podcast?
This is a part of a 2+ hour talk. The topic is scrolling at the bottom of the video. If you search it you can find the full video.
@@ukimenustah26 Isn't this from old podcast? Can you figure it out?
he has several long podcasts with him. this is just a small part of one of the long podcasts. u mean he should be invited frequently.
May Allah give him a long life❤❤
Sir Paul, Please do more sessions and podcasts with Dr Ali especially sessions on history.
Satan deceives and makes people to sin by
1. Throat off bad people shed blood
2. Marry many women here in the name of helping them and get many in heaven
3. Go far place to Rotate around black stone
It would be awesome if Dr. Ataie wrote a book on Paul of Tarsus....that would be interesting!!
Will you buy Dr. Ataie's book?
@@tomceman4451 would you get your public library to keep it , then anyone with an interest can borrow it to read
Brother Paul we’re eager to see a new video with Dr Ali Atai, hopefully there’s one on the way.
Very interesting and thought provoking. Much appreciated, gentlemen.
WE miss dr Ali
@@komrij1944no, he no longer debates that's why
Subhanallah I am seeing this after reading Ehrman's Introduction to the New Testament for my class
same here
Crystal clear . Dr Ali Ataie is a legend !
I respect the scholarly knowledge of Dr Ataie. However I don't rely on the views of any one scholar as being "crystal clear".
I'm not trying to be judgemental. I'm simply acknowledging my own lack of understanding and acceptance of a scholar's interpretation.
And no disrespect to you. In fact, I appreciate the honesty of Muslims ( as long as they are respectful to me ).
I'm just a simple Christian believer. So the Truth about God ( and the Gospels of the New Testament ) does NOT depend on me ! I'm nobody special.
Respectfully from Florida USA
@@johnbrzykcy3076 how are you bro?
@@maazbinhelalI'm okay but still having some health problems.
Also I'm still struggling to understand Islam better. I've not read the Quran yet.
I don't think doubts are necessarily bad but I can't "sit on the fence" forever. I don't want to reject God's love as demonstrated by Jesus' crucifixion.
Anyhow, I don't recall your name. Did we communicate before ?
Respectfully from Florida USA
@@erik.dejong wait ,you have been nice in that comment !!! Wow !! Just bear it !😬
@@johnbrzykcy3076 I don't respect the scholarly knowledge of D.r Ataie. I don't respect any scholar. I watch Dr. Ataie often.
Mr Paul, I would love to see you write a book about comparative theology
Your channel is a goldmine of information, and your perspective is valuable.
Regards.
Amazing. Nice job. May Allah accept your striving. Ameen.
MaShaAllaha BarakAllah may Allah Subhanwatalah protect you n brother Dr.Ali Ataie and guide us all ameen.
May Allah guide them and all of us ameen
Yeah right😴
Ameen
Praise be to Allah SubhanahuWata ala
Allahu Akbar!
La ilahe illallah ❤
We are from Palestine 🇵🇸🇵🇸 I ask you to pray for us, ❤💙::❤❤
Always praying for Palestine against the oppressive apartheid regime
Another great episode, filled with insightful and informative content.👍 May Allah grant you both with Barakah in your time,
أتمنى أن يكون هناك المزيد من المحاضرات مع الأستاذ علي عطائي
We need more long Ali Ataie podcasts ASAP………..
i feel my brain getting bigger already
Your brain is getting smaller.
congratulations!
Yup, it's getting filled up with cr@p
"i feel my brain getting bigger already." It is just an illusion. It is not real.
Need another podcast with him been nearly a year now
Baraka Allah fikom
We want Dr. Ali back.
Also can you give me the full podcast of this
We are missing you Dr Ataie
Love you two together ❤❤❤
Thank You
BarakAllahu Feekum.
I hope this is a taster for a longer interview
Thank you thank you
I would love to learn more about that subtext of the disciples denying thr crucifixion
I like how Paul of Blogging Theology listens to Dr. Ataie. Thats a good example for us ( especially me ) to follow.
I'm not saying that I accept as truth everything that Dr Ataie says. I'm a simple Christian believer. Plus i think its important to listen and learn from various scholars.
By the way, the Truth about God does NOT depend on me ! Thats why I try to respect Muslims and to be somewhat open-minded.
Blessings and peace of God.
U are right But I hve a question why is it that christian holy books was authored by men and not divine revelation? Why God didnot Author ur holy book? How can we trust a book that was authored by men we want salvation ?!
John I’ve noticed you on BT for a very long time, why are you not convinced about Islam?
@@Shabs2456 To be honest, I have not read the Quran yet. Yes I've been listening to Blogging Theology for over 2 years ! But I need to read the Quran myself and I should also visit a mosque and talk with an Islamic scholar.
However, from just listening to the various videos on Blogging Theology, I don't think I know enough about Islam. In fact, some verses in the Quran confuse me ( such as those verses where Allah tells Muslims to accept the previous revelation given to the "People of the book" ).
Also the verses which mention Jesus was not crucified don't seem to make sense because I can't understand exactly what those verses are saying. It's like the real message is hidden or obscured.
Do I make any sense to you?
Of course there are scriptures in the Gospels of the New Testament which also confuse me. So maybe it's ME ??
I appreciate your concern. Honestly, it's not good that I'm having doubts about Islam for such a long time! Right?
I need to make a stand either way. I can't "sit on the fence" forever. Plus I'm getting old.
Peace of God to you..
Bible is 100 % accurate. Qur'an testifies it.
@@arnoldjackson-q2j 🤣🤣🤣
Throughout history the supposed recorded details have either been partially or completely censored. The production of a straight answer or recording without Allah Alhamdulilalla is impossible.
Bible is 100 % accurate. Qur'an testifies it.
@@arnoldjackson-q2j oh no , have you not yet had a lie down ?
"Throughout history the supposed recorded details have either been partially or completely censored." People only censored the Bible. People did not censor any other book.
@@arnoldjackson-q2j "Bible is 100 % accurate. Qur'an testifies it." When a Muslim believes that the Bible is 100% accurate, he becomes a Christian.
@@tomceman4451 Who told you Bible is Corrupted? Your most reliable book is testifying that it is unchanged.
Amazing
Asalamualaikum Wa Rahmatullah Bro Paul and Dr A 🫡 .I appreciate this collaboration . May I use audio clips from your videos to make points I want on live streams I am preparing for please????
Paul changed Jesus, Luke chanded Marc, X changed Y...... and the beat goes on !!
But most significant, Jesus Christ can change my heart. It won't beat any differently, but if my heart makes room for God's mercy and forgiveness, I say a prayer of gratitude.
Bible is 100 % accurate. Qur'an testifies it
@@arnoldjackson-q2jsince you believe Islam came from the devil, you believe satan confirmed your scriptures, you played yourself
@@johnbrzykcy3076 Well, if it works for you, why not. Nonetheless what we have today is not the original of the real Yeshau and his real companions.
@@arnoldjackson-q2j Not at all. You havent read Quran yet !
****1 Timothy 1:13****
Over the years scribes changed the text adding verses taking verses out etc
Subhanallah
salam paul i was searching but your metaphysician new video seems to be private now I'm very very curious because i saw the thumbnail 😅😅 let us in on that please
*Cira international* podcast should have a brief summary about this subject.
*2 Peter 3:16*
Masha Allah 🫂🫂..
Doing morphosemantic and etymological researches through hebrew, aramaic and arabic, I found that Jesus, Yashua' means Ya- Divin Sign, and Shua', the Hour, thus ساعة in the Qur'an, Judgment Day, terrible one. This was most of his preaches, and the Qur'an gives more informations about this Hour. The rabbinism still rejects Jesus and his preach.
"Ya" is an exclamation mark in Hebrew, Syriac-Aramaic and Arabic as " ! "
In both Arabic and Syriac-Aramaic, "ya" (ياء) can serve as an exclamatory prefix, equivalent to "O" or "Ah" in English. In Arabic :
"ya" is used as a vocative particle, indicating direct address or exclamation.
Example: "Ya Allah" (يا الله) - "O Allah"
In Syriac-Aramaic:_
"ya" or "yaw" (ܝܐ) is used as an exclamatory prefix, expressing surprise, emotion, or urgency.
Example: "Ya Maran" (ܝܐ ܡܪܢ) - "O Lord"
Hebrew Influence :
Although Hebrew doesn't typically use "ya" as an exclamatory prefix, the influence of Aramaic and Arabic on Hebrew during the Second Temple period and beyond may have led to some overlap in usage.
Implications for "Yasha" :
Considering this, the name "Yasha" (ישע) could potentially be interpreted as "O Save!" or "Save now!", emphasizing the urgency or intensity of the salvation.
@@zainiabdullah621 Giving etymological precision : Ya in any prophet names is equivalent to Ayat in arabic. Ya-. The Ya you are taliking about is in arabic, it expresses intensity. In arabic, Ayat, Ya and Iyya have different used and meaning. But in hebrew and aramaic, Ya- prefixed to a noun, it's about Divin Intervention, like in Yahya (as), Allah gave Yahya as a Sign for his father Zaccharia (as) surah 19.8 to 10. Too long to bring here all the names starting with this morphem. And it is the jews and christians whom claimed ישע means "save" : Yahoshua' (Joshua) didn't save anything. In fact, Ishaea', Elishea', Yahoshua' and Yashua' carry all the etyma שע which the time passing, Time ساعة. The name of prophets are directly linked with their mission : Ishaea' announced the TIME to come, Yahoshua' is the Sign that the Time had come (take the land), Elisha' his TIME was announced. Studying the hebrew torah, I found many errors in the rabbinic interpretations of hebrew words, and get the point the torah was manipulated, they added some verses trying to explain prophet's name. Indeed the jews changed the meaning of many words, and a morphosemantic approach reveales it. About christians, they don't care God's word, even Jesus's words. The roman built new definitions in greek, many proves of that fact.
@@zainiabdullah621 What you are calling "Vocative", doesn't explain the meaning : YA ! It is something we have to pay extrem attention = Sign. Surah 1.5 : Iyyaka I had investigated about its meaning. Related to the Ya, this is morphosemantic investigation.
@@zainiabdullah621 It is not Yasha but ܝܫܘܥ see the و part of the root سوع like the arabic root. This is why Yahoshua' is not related to the root in Yashua', in case of Joshua' is a damma, not a full letter of the root. Get the point ?
❤
How do we know Paul actually wrote everything in his gospels? Could it have been later church scribes who authored them to fit their trinitarian (or church) theology? i.e. they used the name of Paul? Just a thought.
I think his letters are carbon dated to his time and were in his historical location. That doesn't 100% prove he wrote them, but it makes it probable at best.
@@agp4580 do you have a link about the dating? The other gospels were messed with, so why wasn't Paul's?
@@aq7705 I think I made a mistake, the earliest carbon date is 175 to 250 AD. There is a chance of interpolations within his writings too.
Paul didn't write any gospels! Get the basics right.
@@erehwhon ok. His writings (letters).
Read the Gospels in the language they were written in...Greek.
"Son of man" can be "Son of andros".
But "Andros" is also a Greek form of the name "Andrew".
Note how many times "Jesus"(not his name) is referred to as "the man". Is this a proper translation? Or should it have been written as "Andros" or "Andrew"?
Are you sure the Greek defines "son of man" as "Son of Andros" ? I had never heard such a definition according to the Greek language. I thought "son of man" could be a synonym for "Son of Adam" or simply a human being ?
Of course I could be wrong. I tried to study Biblical Greek but understanding it eluded me. Now I'm getting old.
If my understanding of "son of man" is incorrect, I apologize. My scholarly ability is not always good.
Respectfully from Florida USA
@@johnbrzykcy3076 "Jesus" was not who, or what, people today claim he was.
Here's one. Read these 4 verses together...
Book of Revelation. Ch11v8, Ch14v8, Ch17v9, Ch17v18.
New Hadith Narration 😂😂
Preterism has been around a long time, you just hearing about it now? There is another explanation that correctly explains the prophecy.
@e.anderson2545 There are no such things as "prophets".
I don't know what your explanation is, as you never said what you believe it is.
But, the concepts of "Old" and "New" Testaments only start in 16th century.
Up until then it was widely taken for granted that Christ lived BEFORE Moses, David, Solomon etc. When Isaiah or Daniel eg. speak of Christ they are not being "prophets", they are referring to something that happened in the past.
The Reliability of The Bible
Evidence of Author's & Dates Written ︎ Matthew - A tax collector who became Jesus' apostle and wrote about the life of Jesus as the Messiah for the Jewish community c. 60 AD. ︎
Mark - A Jew, and a companion of Peter and Paul, who wrote for both Jews and Gentiles about Christ's death and resurrection c. 60 AD. ︎
Luke - A Gentile doctor, and a companion of Peter and Paul who wrote for the Gentiles about Christ the saviour for humankind. c. 60 AD ︎ Luke - also wrote the Acts of the Apostles c. 60 AD. ︎
John - The 'beloved' apostle of Jesus, wrote in his later years about the Word who took on Flesh (John 1:1,14) c. 80-90 AD. ︎ John - also wrote 3 Letters and The Book of Revelations c. 80-90 AD. ︎ James - Jesus' step-brother, wrote 1 letter c. 35 AD. ︎
Paul - wrote 13 letters c.49 - 65 AD. ︎
Jude - wrote 1 letter c. 65 AD. ︎
Peter - wrote 2 letters c. 67 AD. ︎
The author of The Letter to Hebrews is unknown c. 65 AD. (Wikipedia). ︎
Jesus Christ's' ministry occurred between 27-30 A.D. ︎ Christianity began after the Crucifixion and Resurrection of Jesus Christ when thousands of Jews became followers of 'The Way' (Jesus). ︎
The New Testament scholar, F.F. Bruce, gives strong historical evidence that the New Testament was completed by A.D. 100. ︎ Most writings of the New Testament were completed twenty to forty years before 100 AD. (Wikipedia). ︎ The apostles and their companions wrote the New Testament from their first-hand experiences with Jesus. New Testament integrity is supported by historians, biblical and textual scholars, along with thousands of early codices, manuscripts and the Dead Sea Scrolls, proving the validity and preservation of the Gospels written between c. 35-90 A.D (Eusebius, Church History 111. 39 .15; Irenaeus Against Heresies, 111.1)
INTERNAL Evidence: ︎ The internal evidence supports these early dates for several reasons. The first three Gospels prophesied the fall of the Jerusalem Temple which occurred in A.D. 70. However, the fulfillment is not mentioned. It is strange that these three Gospels predict this major event but do not record it happening. Why do they not mention such an important prophetic milestone? The most plausible explanation is that it had not yet occurred at the time Matthew, Mark, and Luke were written. ︎ In the book of Acts, the Temple plays a central role in the nation of Israel. Luke writes as if the Temple is an important part of Jewish life. He also ends Acts on a strange note: Paul living under house arrest. It is strange that Luke does not record the death of his two chief characters, Peter and Paul. The most plausible reason for this is that Luke finished writing Acts before Peter and Paul's martyrdom in A.D. 64. A significant point to highlight is that the Gospel of Luke precedes Acts, further supporting the traditional dating of c. A.D. 60. Most scholars agree Mark precedes Luke, making Mark's Gospel even earlier. ︎
Finally, the majority of New Testament scholars believe that Paul's epistles are written from A.D. 48-60. Paul's outline of the life of Jesus matches that of the Gospels. 1 Corinthians is one of the least disputed books regarding its dating and Pauline authorship. In 1Corinthians chapter 15, Paul summarizes the gospel and reinforces the premise that this is the same gospel preached by the apostles. Paul quotes from Luke's Gospel in 1 Timothy 5:18, showing us that Luke's Gospel was indeed completed in Paul's lifetime. This would move the time of the completion of Luke's Gospel along with Mark and Matthew. This Internal Evidence presents a strong case for the early dating of the Gospels.
EXTERNAL Evidence - Gospel Dates: ︎ Were the Gospels written by eyewitnesses of the events, or were they not recorded until centuries later? As with the internal evidence, the external evidence also supports a first century date. ︎ Fortunately, New Testament scholars have an enormous amount of ancient manuscript evidence. The documentary evidence for the New Testament far surpasses any other work of its time, with over 5000 manuscripts, and many are dated within a few years of their authors' lives.
KEY documents: ︎ Chester Beatty Papyri contains most of the N.T. writings, and is dated around A.D. 250. ︎ The Bodmer Papyri contains most of John, and dates to A.D. 200. ︎ Rylands Papyri that was found in Egypt and contains large fragments of John, and dates to A.D. 130. From this fragment we can conclude that John was completed well before A.D. 130 because, not only did the gospel have to be written, it had to be hand copied and make its way down from Greece to Egypt. The majority of scholars agree that John is the last gospel written, so we can affirm its first century date along with the other three with greater assurance. EARLY New Testament Papyrus Manuscripts: ︎ Dead Sea Scrolls, the Full Text of Isaiah 53 and a portion of every book, c. 250 BC. ︎ Old Testament Greek Septuagint c. 200 BC. ︎ P52 (John Rylands Fragment) - John 18:31-33; 37-38 c. 96 AD ︎ P90 (Oxyrhynchus) - John 18:36; 19:7 c. 96 AD ︎ P104 (Oxyrhynchus) - Matthew 21:34-37, 43, 45 c. 60-65 AD ︎ P46 (Chester Beatty Papyrus) - Romans 5:17-6; 5-14; 8:15-25; 27-35; 10:1-11, 22, 24-33, 35; 16:1-23; 25-27. And Hebrews; 1 & 2; Corinthians; Ephesians; Galatians; Philippians; Colossians; 1 Thessalonians 1:1, 9-10; 2:1-3; 5:5-9, 23-28 c. 50’s-70’s AD ︎ P98 (IFAO) - Revelation 1:13; 2:1 c. 90 AD ︎ P66 (Bodmer Papyrus) - John 1:1-6,11; 6:35; 14:26; fragment of 14:29; 21:9 c. 70’s AD ︎ P67 Matthew 3:9, 15; 5:20-22; 25-28 c. 60-65 AD ︎ Evidence also comes from the Dead Sea Scrolls Cave 7. Jose Callahan discovered a large fragment of the Gospel of Mark and dated it to have been written in A.D. 50. Also large fragments of Acts and other epistles and dated them to have been written slightly after A.D. 50.4 Another line of evidence is the writings of the church fathers. ︎ CLEMENT of Rome sent a letter to the Corinthian church in A.D. 95. in which he quoted from the Gospels and other portions of the N.T. ︎ IGNATIUS, Bishop of Antioch, wrote a letter before his martyrdom in Rome in A.D. 115, quoting all the Gospels and other N.T. letters. ︎ POLYCARP wrote to the Philippians in A.D. 120 and quoted from the Gospels and N.T. letters. ︎ JUSTIN MARTYR, A.D. 150 quotes John 3. Church fathers of the early second century were familiar with the apostle's writings and quoted them as inspired Scripture. ︎ Early dating is important for two reasons. The closer a historical record is to the date of the event, the more likely the record is accurate. Early dating allows for eyewitnesses to still be alive when the Gospels were circulating to attest to their accuracy. The apostles often appeal to the witness of the hostile crowd, pointing to their knowledge of the facts as well (Acts 2:22, 26:26). Also, the time is too short for legends to develop. Historians agree it takes about two generations, or eighty years, for legendary accounts to establish themselves. From the evidence, we can conclude the Gospels were indeed written by the authors they are attributed to. THE First Fully Bound Bible Books/Codices ︎ Codex Vaticanus: Origin 1st century M/S - first Codex, 280 - 330 AD ︎ Codex Siniaticus: Origin 1st century M/S - first Codex, 300 - 350 AD ︎ Codex Alexandrius: Origin 1st century M/S - first Codex, 350 - 400 AD ︎ Codex Vulgate: Origin 1st century M/S - first Codex, 380 - 400 AD JESUS and the Jews were multilingual ︎ "Pilate had a notice prepared and fastened to the cross. It read: 'JESUS Of NAZARETH, THE KING Of THE JEWS'. Many of the Jews read this sign, for the place where Jesus was crucified was near the city, and the sign was written in Hebrew, Aramaic, Latin and Greek" (John 19:19-20) ︎ The Gospels were written in Koine Greek being the World's language in the 1st century The Hebrew Bible was translated into Greek (Septuagint) c.200 BC for the many Greek speaking Jews It is well known that first-century Jerusalem was inhabited by Greek speaking Jews who were at least bilingual. And Jesus most likely was trilingual apart from the ability to read minds. So the original Gospels were written in Koine Greek and sent throughout the World.. ︎ Jewish culture was heavily influenced by Hellenistic culture, and Koine Greek was used not only for international communication but also as the first language of many Jews. This development was furthered by the fact that the largest Jewish community in the world lived in Ptolemaic Alexandria. (Wikipedia) GOD Protects His Sacred Words: ︎ "But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let them be under God’s curse! As we have already said, so now I say again: If anybody is preaching to you a gospel other than what you accepted, let them be under God’s curse!" (Galatians 1:8-9). ︎ Jesus said, "Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away" (Matt 24:35). ︎
God protects His Word & Gospels and warns of antichrists. (1John2:22). ︎ Christ's Good News of Salvation, His Birth, Crucifixion and Resurrection hasn't changed for 2000 years. ︎ The Gospels are evidenced by internal and external historical, archeological & literary facts. ︎ The Gospels are reliable and transparent with any variations transparently referenced in the footnotes. ︎ The Gospels have 1000 times more manuscripts than the most documented ancient literature by Greco-Roman historian, Suetonius. ︎ Bible is the most comprehensive and reliable source re. 1st century Jerusalem history & used by archaeologists supporting research today.. Hallelujah.
they have to do what they have to do bro, if thier own sources acknowledge John Peter Paul, you have centuries of textual criticism proving unequalled manuscripts attestation in the thousands , with thousands of scribes transmissiting the text in different centuries and different geographical areas and archaeological evidence for older manuscripts being used for newer transmission and have the incredible odds of 99% and above agreement in all the text against all that textual dissection , he even has to deceive the audience as if the quranic content wasn't available before muhammed leave alone testing the quran with the same textual and transmission examination given to the Bible by secular Liberal Jewish and Christian scholarship
Valuable information👍👍 . But is no use for muslims. Because they are followed by blind faith. Have you ever noticed any logic in their arguments?😂😂
100% comment brother thanks ,check my comment on the coments section too but click new comments first
The Jews and Christians have committed extremes against Jesus. that’s why Islam had to restore balance and rationality. The Jews rejected Jesus altogether. The Christians made him God. Only the Muslims did justice to Jesus by giving him his rightful position ie one of the greatest Prophets of God ❤
Sir I can suggest maybe you document your videos and media on different platforms because of the fear of loss. I can suggest Telegram, Instagram and maybe Tiktok. Best wishes always! You have a fantastic channel!
Lucifer whispered to Paul, so they can continue on with Worldly adventures and Sin, there going to heaven anyway. This argument about Jesus is actually invalid as God says in Ali Imran 3-19 that Islam is the belief for humankind.
❤💚🖤🤍💯 *_Dr Al Ataie unpeels the false belief of Christian in style._*
the creation of universe in quran. paul do a video about it. more science and islam. best subject ever
Ali, you shall endure the lake of fire unless you repent and believe Jesus is God
Help me understand, where did Jesus talk about the coming of Muhammad?
Paraclete
And who is the Prophet like Moses mentioned in Deuteronomy except Muhammad? ﷺ
@@andrewpalim1978 who is the Prophet like Moses mentioned in Deuteronomy except Jesus?
@@tomceman4451 Jesus led never an army while Moses and Muhammad did. Jesus never led his people on an exodus while Moses and Muhammad did. Jesus never married, while Moses and Muhammad did. Jesus never had children while Moses and Muhammad did. Jesus was raised by his mother while Moses and Muhammad were not. Jesus was sent to fulfill the law, while Moses and Muhammad were sent with new laws. Jesus never grew old, while Moses and Muhammad did. Jesus never judged and sentenced a criminal while Moses and Muhammad did. The list goes on and on. You are just repeating what the pastor told you. Look at the passage with some critical thinking.
@@andrewpalim1978Jesus saved the Soul from Hell(Hades) like Moses saved the Israelites from Egypt
Jesus was a member of the family of Abraham Isaac and Jacob like Moses was a member of the family of Abraham Isaac and Jacob.
Moses had anointing like Jesus had Anointing
Jesus does the will of God and Moses does the will of God
Jesus said to keep the commendement like Moses said to keep the commendement
And Both at them don't allow Child marriage
Muhammad never does the will of God, Muhammad never said to keep the commendement
Muhammad is like a Prophet of Joseph Smith
Well, lots of claims about Jesus made by skimming the surface.
Jesus’ message was the Kingdom of God creating a better world of peace and happiness.
Please demonstrate how this has been improved upon by Islam. Thanks
Islam did not change the message or improve upon it. All the prophets came with the same message: The reality that there is only One God. Islam is the final message, which corrects the contradictions and errors in the previous scriptures. Laws may change from Prophet to Prophet, such as how and when to pray, fast, sacrifice, and make alms; but facts of reality do not change, such as there is One God, who created heaven, hell, angels, and devils, and sent messengers with holy books to guide mankind in the quest to know God.
I respect Dr Ataie and Muslims too.
I do agree with you that "Jesus' message was the Kingdom of God creating a better world of peace..."
I don't really see that better world in our present-day world. But my observations don't negate Jesus' teachings and God's plan of salvation and peace.
Because Truth about Jesus doesn't depend on me! I'm just a simple Christian believer. Only God is all-knowing.
Respectfully...
Islam demonstrated by destroying middle East 😂😂
Islam ( Submission to The One Eternal , Transcendental , Universal All Creator Alone Worthy of Worship , Unto Whom All Belong & All Return to account ) has Always been the message , conveyed by all the prophets Adam , Noah , Abraham , Moses , Jesus & Finally The Final Messenger , Peace Upon All ,
@@BrightStar-s3u What's new? It has always being the purpose of Judaism and Christianity. It seems Islam copied them
“For the Son of Man is to come with his angels in the glory of his Father, and then he will repay everyone for what has been done. Truly I tell you, there are some standing here who will not taste death before they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom.”
Matthew 16:27-28
In his own words, Jesus will not taste death before he sees “the son of man” and his kingdom. Jesus is foretelling events to occur in two different eras: the first millennium (the day on which the prophecy starts to realize) and the third millennium (the third day, witnessing the fulfillment of prophecy). Jesus is promising a redemption to be fulfilled through two different comings or individuals: Imam Husayn who will be killed to fill earth with atonement and Imam Mahdi who will be raised to fill earth with justice.
“But do not ignore this one fact, beloved, that with the Lord one day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like one day.”
2 Peter 3:8
The authors of what is written are the Authority of their words! The fact that no actual book written by jesus( which is not even his correct name) exists, proves the new testament was not authorised by him!
Even if he was the real speaker of those parables, they are all coming from second or even third hand sources, not from the true Author!
If he did once write a gospel, we dont have it!
Respectfully, I tend to disagree with you. Are you making the implication that since we have "no actual book written by Jesus", that the present-day Gospels are not authentic teachings of Jesus?
I myself don't believe Jesus ever wrote a gospel or a book. I could be wrong. From my understanding, Muslims do believe that Jesus Christ did write a book called the "Injeel". If I understand incorrectly, would a Muslim let me know.
I'm a simple Christian believer who stands upon the foundational aspects of Christianity, which are Jesus' incarnation, crucifixion and resurrection.
However I try to respect Muslims. In fact, the truth about Jesus doesn't depend on me ! I'm nobody special. Only God is all-knowing.
Respectfully from Florida USA
@johnbrzykcy3076 yes I'm saying at least 50 percent of the new testament is fake and 100 percent of it was not written by him! Neither was jesus his real name! Christi-anity is a fake made up religion part Roman pagan God man, mixed in with old testament traditions!
@@ohfft I respect your views but I can't accept the truth that Christianity is based upon pagan ideology. Is that what you're saying?
I believe in a loving God and Jesus Christ Himself was the ultimate example of God's love for us.
No disrespect intended to you.
For the most inspirational teachings by Jesus, read his parables of The Good Samaritan and The Prodigal Son ! Wow ! If only we could follow such wonderful examples.
Respectfully from Florida USA
@johnbrzykcy3076 Sure can believe he was a great servant of God, or a pure example of how humans and humanity should be! But to declare he was God or a part of God, is nothing other than paganism! Just like pagan Romans believed those who reached a level of popularity and power were gods!
According to your logic, Qur'an was not authored by Muhammad. Hence, it was not authorised by him😂😂
I AM senth to release keys to unlock A Book.
Please refrain from associating old text of unknown origin with our current [electric] work.
We invite humans to electrify this current civilization.
Assalamualaikum
Let’s talk about the scientific inaccuracies in the Quran. The blatant man made scientific errors of how man thought 1500yrs ago. Any takers???
Scientific error in Qur'an.
1. God created whole universe in 6 days ( 6000 years) while Scientific discovery shows it took atleast 13.7 billion years
2. Earth is flat according to islamic science. 😂😂
@@arnoldjackson-q2jit is 6 epochs, not earth days LMAO and you believe God rested on the 7th. You are the one who actually believes in 6 earth days but throwing your belief onto us. Majority of our midieval scholars believed the earth was round, ibn taymiyyah said it was an ijmah meaning consensus based on the Quran and sunnah. You failed.
@@WeAreGhuraba 1. Why epoch, say EON! Qur'an 47:22, clearly says God's 1 day is equal to 1000 years of human counting.
2. It doesn't matter ,what they believed. We are talking about a book which claimed to be Word of God. It should provide true information.
3. God rested on 7 th days is a figure of speech, means he finished his creative work on earth
Go take some English grammar classes.😆
@@arnoldjackson-q2j Yet another verse in a different context shows 50,000 years, so different context comes out to different measurements. Days here is more properly translated as stages, eras or epochs.
@@arnoldjackson-q2j Research 6 eras, epochs or stages of creation like fundamental particle era etc.
I flew aircrafts. Nothing special about descending between the clouds. 🤷♀️
KING = notification from enlightment of current [electric] giving with numerous by LIBRARY.
Self explanatory. Library and electricity.
Not a physical 'king' 🤭
Basil antus.
Colourful from chrominance activation with intelligent from affirm signal by linking from current of perform activation with Gift from The One numerous by utilize of SIGNAL
When Mathew and Luke use Mark word for word in some instance and not others, it shows that they have no alternative sources of their own, while at the same time they do not consider Mark authoritative or divinely inspired. In other words, based on Christian's own views, the Gospels are not reliable.
I disagree. But the truth doesn't depend on me ! I'm just a simple Christian believer.
No disrespect intended to you.
Peace from Florida USA
@johnbrzykcy3076 And Muslims respect the message of Jesus in the Gospels, and love him and his mother and family.
@@arbitScaleModelsi appreciate your kind response and your honesty. I have no desire to judge Muslims. ( Unfortunately, as fallen human beings, we seemingly think we are always correct in our judgements ).
I'm just a simple Christian believer. So the truth doesn't depend on me !
Again, no problem with your comments. In fact, I like your response.
Peace of God to you and your family
@@johnbrzykcy3076 Peace to you too. I recommend you read about Jesus Family and brother James. Check out some vids by Prof. James Tabor.
@@arbitScaleModelsI appreciate your advice. And yes I like to listen to various scholars ( both Christian and Muslim ).
Yes I do need to understand better the beliefs of James, the brother of Jesus. Does the Quran mention "James" specifically?
Respectfully from Florida USA.
jesus was is new and old testaments
How is that funny?
Your comment should be , Muhammad in OT and NT 🤣🤣🤣🤣
It's quite amusing and very desperate to see certain christians here maniacally diverting the topic because they can't defend their corrupted religion. May Allah reward these two brothers and guide us and many to Islam.
I'm a simple Christian believer but I'm curious. What do you mean by Christians "can't defend their corrupted religion"?
By the way, no disrespect intended. And I'm not looking for confrontation. I'm trying to understand Islam better.
Peace of God to you...
@johnbrzykcy3076 hi John, if you read the comments these 'certain christians' are posting here, you will get your answer.
@@hajarislam2917 I appreciate your response but are you making the implication that all of Christianity is "corrupted" ?
Anyhow, I myself can't "defend" various doctrines of Christianity. So that's why I try to bring up a different "topic" related to the truth about Jesus Christ. Of course my views and beliefs may be wrong. Because I'm not infallible.
I still stand on the foundational aspects of Christianity which point to God's love for us. These foundational beliefs are the incarnation of Jesus, His crucifixion and His resurrection.
Of course the truth about Jesus ( and God ! ) doesn't depend on me. I'm nobody special.
But I do try to respect Muslims.
Respectfully from Florida USA
@@johnbrzykcy3076 yes, christianity as it is today, is factual corrupted, because its teachings come from a corrupted source. The bible. This is attested by enough biblical scholars. Follow this channel and listen to/watch the content and you will come across many proofs for this coming from different reliable scholarly sources. Bye.
@@hajarislam2917But Allah confirmed Torah and gospel so you say Allah is a liar? Well…I agree with you…
Allah promised to protect Torah, gospel and Quran…and failed miserably. And this is your god?
Wake up soon! Time is running up!
If you read the bible and understand correctly you will find that there is a few different jesus there.Whoever wrote the bible didn't realise that we will find all the mistakes they made
Respectfully, what do you mean by "you will find that there is a few different Jesus" in the Bible?
I'm just curious what you mean. No disrespect intended to you. I'm just a simple Christian believer.
Respectfully from Florida USA
What mistakes? I know tons of mistakes in Quran and Hadith…if they say Christianity is false it is true probably as Islam is opposed to Christianity.
From my understanding, doesn't the phrase "son of man" simply refer to "human being" ? So could it be that Jesus often considered His own humanity?
So using the phrase "son of man" in reference to prophet Muhammad is an implication that Muhammad was a human being. No disrespect to Muslims.
However in Jesus' situation, He is also given other titles in the Gospels of the New Testament. Such as "Lord", "Son of the Living God", "teacher", "the Good Shepherd", "The Word" ( Logos in Greek ) and more ! I think we certainly need to consider these other titles given to Jesus in correlation to the title "son of man".
What do Muslims think?
By the way, the truth regarding Jesus' identity doesn't depend on me ! It depends on God Himself. What God ( Allah ) says about Jesus in the Gospels. I only mention the Gospels because I'm not very familiar with the Quran. From my understanding, the Quran itself doesn't say much about Jesus. Is that correct?
By the way, I'm learning slowly about Islam. I have no desire to disrespect Muslims but I also dislike confrontation. I'm getting old so I prefer to listen carefully.
Also, I respect the scholarly knowledge of Dr Ataie ( although I usually like to listen to various scholars, both Christian and Muslim ).
Has Dr Ataie written any books?
Respectfully from Florida USA.
Peace to both Muslims and Christians.
Unitarians read the same verses and don't come out believing in Jesus being God so...
@@WeAreGhuraba I appreciate your honesty. I don't know anything about Unitarians so I need to get information.
Yes I agree that people tend to interpret scriptures in different ways. That's why I must try to be respectful to people, although I may see things differently.
By the way, what's your understanding of Islam and the Quran?
Peace to you...
Historical accuracy?😂
They're greek drama meant for the theater
Dr Ali aged so fast! May be the stress of being famous through BT 😅. Jazakallah for this amazing scholar and to Paul for discovery.
Muhammed was'nt the one to come.
The reason why Christianity is so full of contradictions is because the christians want all the titles and prophecies for Jesus A.S. It can't work if the son of god refers to himself as the son of man. They say jesus is the prophet like Moses A.S. So Moses is also a son of god now? Comparing your god to a prophet is ludicrous. But here we are because he has to be in that prophecy aswell. The hoops you have to jump through to believe your god offed hismelf for your sins...
Bro even in Isaiah 42, they say that the servant is Jesus while it clearly says where kedar lived. Their gos was called servant,prophet,son of man but never god
@@OmarAlkhatib-c8z tell that to them. Watch them get triggered. It's hilarious.
The quran tells that gospel Is 100 % accurate . The Question should be on the "Historical accuracy of Qur'an".
Define the wht u think gospel is?
When it was reveled the gospels orgionally were accurate..its when scribes started changing the text adding verses taking verses out etc then it became corrupted
@@brucerae6508 What is the source of your information
"The quran tells that gospel Is 100 % accurate." If a Muslim believes that the gospel is 100% accurate, he would become a Christian.
@@brucerae6508 No other religious book of antiquity is corrupted, except the Bible. Why?
The NT GOSPELS - Evidence of Author's & Dates Written
▪︎ Matthew - A tax collector who became Jesus' apostle and wrote about the life of Jesus as the Messiah for the Jewish community c. 60 AD.
▪︎ Mark - A Jew, and a companion of Peter and Paul, who wrote for both Jews and Gentiles about Christ's death and resurrection c. 60 AD.
▪︎ Luke - A Gentile doctor, and a companion of Peter and Paul who wrote for the Gentiles about Christ the saviour for humankind. c. 60 AD
▪︎ Luke - also wrote the Acts of the Apostles c. 60 AD.
▪︎ John - The 'beloved' apostle of Jesus, wrote in his later years about the Word who took on Flesh (John 1:1,14) c. 80-90 AD.
▪︎ John - also wrote 3 Letters and The Book of Revelations c. 80-90 AD.
▪︎ James - Jesus' step-brother, wrote 1 letter c. 35 AD.
▪︎ Paul - wrote 13 letters c.49 - 65 AD.
▪︎ Jude - wrote 1 letter c. 65 AD.
▪︎ Peter - wrote 2 letters c. 67 AD.
▪︎ The author of The Letter to Hebrews is unknown c. 65 AD.
(Wikipedia).
▪︎ Jesus Christ's' ministry occurred between 27-30 A.D.
▪︎ Christianity began after the Crucifixion and Resurrection of Jesus Christ when thousands of Jews became followers of 'The Way' (Jesus).
▪︎ The New Testament scholar, F.F. Bruce, gives strong historical evidence that the New Testament was completed by A.D. 100.
▪︎ Most writings of the New Testament were completed twenty to forty years before 100 AD. (Wikipedia).
▪︎ The apostles and their companions wrote the New Testament from their first-hand experiences with Jesus.
New Testament integrity is supported by historians, biblical and textual scholars, along with thousands of early codices, manuscripts and the Dead Sea Scrolls, proving the validity and preservation of the Gospels written between c. 35-90 A.D
(Eusebius, Church History 111. 39 .15; Irenaeus Against Heresies, 111.1)
INTERNAL Evidence:
▪︎ The internal evidence supports these early dates for several reasons. The first three Gospels prophesied the fall of the Jerusalem Temple which occurred in A.D. 70. However, the fulfillment is not mentioned. It is strange that these three Gospels predict this major event but do not record it happening. Why do they not mention such an important prophetic milestone? The most plausible explanation is that it had not yet occurred at the time Matthew, Mark, and Luke were written.
▪︎ In the book of Acts, the Temple plays a central role in the nation of Israel. Luke writes as if the Temple is an important part of Jewish life. He also ends Acts on a strange note: Paul living under house arrest.
It is strange that Luke does not record the death of his two chief characters, Peter and Paul. The most plausible reason for this is that Luke finished writing Acts before Peter and Paul's martyrdom in A.D. 64. A significant point to highlight is that the Gospel of Luke precedes Acts, further supporting the traditional dating of c. A.D. 60.
Most scholars agree Mark precedes Luke, making Mark's Gospel even earlier.
▪︎ Finally, the majority of New Testament scholars believe that Paul's epistles are written from A.D. 48-60. Paul's outline of the life of Jesus matches that of the Gospels.
1 Corinthians is one of the least disputed books regarding its dating and Pauline authorship.
In 1Corinthians chapter 15, Paul summarizes the gospel and reinforces the premise that this is the same gospel preached by the apostles.
Paul quotes from Luke's Gospel in 1 Timothy 5:18, showing us that Luke's Gospel was indeed completed in Paul's lifetime. This would move the time of the completion of Luke's Gospel along with Mark and Matthew.
This Internal Evidence presents a strong case for the early dating of the Gospels.
EXTERNAL Evidence - Gospel Dates:
▪︎ Were the Gospels written by eyewitnesses of the events, or were they not recorded until centuries later? As with the internal evidence, the external evidence also supports a first century date.
▪︎ Fortunately, New Testament scholars have an enormous amount of ancient manuscript evidence. The documentary evidence for the New Testament far surpasses any other work of its time, with over 5000 manuscripts, and many are dated within a few years of their authors' lives.
KEY documents:
▪︎ Chester Beatty Papyri contains most of the N.T. writings, and is dated around A.D. 250.
▪︎ The Bodmer Papyri contains most of John, and dates to A.D. 200.
▪︎ Rylands Papyri that was found in Egypt and contains large fragments of John, and dates to A.D. 130.
From this fragment we can conclude that John was completed well before A.D. 130 because, not only did the gospel have to be written, it had to be hand copied and make its way down from Greece to Egypt.
The majority of scholars agree that John is the last gospel written, so we can affirm its first century date along with the other three with greater assurance.
EARLY New Testament Papyrus Manuscripts:
▪︎ Dead Sea Scrolls, the Full Text of Isaiah 53 and a portion of every book, c. 250 BC.
▪︎ Old Testament Greek Septuagint c. 200 BC.
▪︎ P52 (John Rylands Fragment) - John 18:31-33; 37-38 c. 96 AD
▪︎ P90 (Oxyrhynchus) - John 18:36; 19:7 c. 96 AD
▪︎ P104 (Oxyrhynchus) - Matthew 21:34-37, 43, 45 c. 60-65 AD
▪︎ P46 (Chester Beatty Papyrus) - Romans 5:17-6; 5-14; 8:15-25; 27-35; 10:1-11, 22, 24-33, 35; 16:1-23; 25-27.
And Hebrews; 1 & 2; Corinthians; Ephesians; Galatians; Philippians; Colossians; 1 Thessalonians 1:1, 9-10; 2:1-3; 5:5-9, 23-28 c. 50’s-70’s AD
▪︎ P98 (IFAO) - Revelation 1:13; 2:1 c. 90 AD
▪︎ P66 (Bodmer Papyrus) - John 1:1-6,11; 6:35; 14:26; fragment of 14:29; 21:9 c. 70’s AD
▪︎ P67 Matthew 3:9, 15; 5:20-22; 25-28 c. 60-65 AD
▪︎ Evidence also comes from the Dead Sea Scrolls Cave 7.
Jose Callahan discovered a large fragment of the Gospel of Mark and dated it to have been written in A.D. 50. Also large fragments of Acts and other epistles and dated them to have been written slightly after A.D. 50.4
Another line of evidence is the writings of the church fathers.
▪︎ CLEMENT of Rome sent a letter to the Corinthian church in A.D. 95. in which he quoted from the Gospels and other portions of the N.T.
▪︎ IGNATIUS, Bishop of Antioch, wrote a letter before his martyrdom in Rome in A.D. 115, quoting all the Gospels and other N.T. letters.
▪︎ POLYCARP wrote to the Philippians in A.D. 120 and quoted from the Gospels and N.T. letters.
▪︎ JUSTIN MARTYR, A.D. 150 quotes John 3. Church fathers of the early second century were familiar with the apostle's writings and quoted them as inspired Scripture.
▪︎ Early dating is important for two reasons. The closer a historical record is to the date of the event, the more likely the record is accurate. Early dating allows for eyewitnesses to still be alive when the Gospels were circulating to attest to their accuracy.
The apostles often appeal to the witness of the hostile crowd, pointing to their knowledge of the facts as well (Acts 2:22, 26:26).
Also, the time is too short for legends to develop.
Historians agree it takes about two generations, or eighty years, for legendary accounts to establish themselves.
From the evidence, we can conclude the Gospels were indeed written by the authors they are attributed to.
THE First Fully Bound Bible Books/Codices
▪︎ Codex Vaticanus: Origin 1st century M/S - first Codex, 280 - 330 AD
▪︎ Codex Siniaticus: Origin 1st century M/S - first Codex, 300 - 350 AD
▪︎ Codex Alexandrius: Origin 1st century M/S - first Codex, 350 - 400 AD
▪︎ Codex Vulgate: Origin 1st century M/S - first Codex, 380 - 400 AD
JESUS and the Jews were multilingual
▪︎ "Pilate had a notice prepared and fastened to the cross.
It read: 'JESUS Of NAZARETH, THE KING Of THE JEWS'.
Many of the Jews read this sign, for the place where Jesus was crucified was near the city, and the sign was written in Hebrew, Aramaic, Latin and Greek" (John 19:19-20)
▪︎ The Gospels were written in Koine Greek being the World's language in the 1st century
The Hebrew Bible was translated into Greek (Septuagint) c.200 BC for the many Greek speaking Jews
It is well known that first-century Jerusalem was inhabited by Greek speaking Jews who were at least bilingual. And Jesus most likely was trilingual apart from the ability to read minds.
So the original Gospels were written in Koine Greek and sent throughout the World..
▪︎ Jewish culture was heavily influenced by Hellenistic culture, and Koine Greek was used not only for international communication but also as the first language of many Jews. This development was furthered by the fact that the largest Jewish community in the world lived in Ptolemaic Alexandria. (Wikipedia)
GOD Protects His Sacred Words:
▪︎ "But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let them be under God’s curse!
As we have already said, so now I say again: If anybody is preaching to you a gospel other than what you accepted, let them be under God’s curse!" (Galatians 1:8-9).
▪︎ Jesus said, "Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away" (Matt 24:35).
▪︎ God protects His Word & Gospels and warns of antichrists. (1John2:22).
▪︎ Christ's Good News of Salvation, His Birth, Crucifixion and Resurrection hasn't changed for 2000 years.
▪︎ The Gospels are evidenced by internal and external historical, archeological & literary facts.
▪︎ The Gospels are reliable and transparent with any variations transparently referenced in the footnotes.
▪︎ The Gospels have 1000 times more manuscripts than the most documented ancient literature by Greco-Roman historian, Suetonius.
▪︎ Bible is the most comprehensive and reliable source re. 1st century Jerusalem history & used by archaeologists supporting research today..
Hallelujah......
Christianity is on its deathbed. Blah blah blah.
Amazing post! Jesus is Lord.
Very well explained! May god bless you! 🙏
IT WAS ABSOLUTELY DEBUNKED BY BART ERHMAN,,,
THEY WEREN'T JESUS DISCIPLES & NO EYEWITNESSES,,,,
ITS WRITTEN. 60-80 YEARS AFTER JESUS DIED,,,, ( YOUR VERSIONS ),,,,, ruclips.net/video/3JEiFo0LbjI/видео.htmlsi=v66XPd5WLsGgzumm
Mohamed said the gospel is authentic and u should use it to judge. This man is saying it is not. Who will u believe?
JESUS IS GOD 👑†🕊
vast majority of it is not accurate
Because of the historical accuracy Jesus was able to perform miracles, raise the dead and heal the blind...IT SHOWS THAT HISTORICAL ACCURACY HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ESTABLISHING FAITH IN JESUS CHRIST
More lies and misreading of scripture from Dr Ataie and Paul Williams.
Jesus quotes Psalm 22, and this clearly speaks about the crucifixion of the Suffering Servant.
Daniel 7:13,14 is about the resurrection of the Son of man. This is consistent with the message of all the Gospels. To suggest that Jesus ascended to heaven without first dying is to suggest that flesh and blood can inherit the kingdom of God. What nonsense!
All this is being spouted by Muslim apologists who don't even know that God is Spirit!
Don't get sucked in by these lies.
Full Nonsense 😂😂
Most scholars don't find it convincing, and your dependency is on a mistranslation anyways. He prayed to be saved only to be put on the cross anyways yelling about being forsaken, with an earlier reading saying he was mocked! he would not recite words of unbelief over inspiring words.
@@WeAreGhuraba
You clearly don't know the scriptures.
Psalm 22 was written by David nearly a thousand years before the birth of Jesus. By quoting the first verse of Psalm 22, Jesus was encouraging his listeners to look up the Psalm and understand its message. Jewish rabbis did not fully understand this Psalm, and it needed Jesus dying on the cross to reveal its true meaning. This is another reason for believing the Gospels, because no disciple of Jesus could have made this up! Only the Messiah, the true spirit of prophecy, could have known the meaning of this Psalm.
Have you read Psalm 22? Do you realise that God did not forsake his Son? Why do you think Psalm 23 talks about resurrection, and Psalm 24 about ascension?
Dr. Ali Ataie is making one ENORMOUS assumption.
And you know what happens when you assume...
Terrible arguments Ali Alitae!
Daniel 7:13-14 explicitly identifies that a human would: Gain access to the Ancient of Days, would be given rulership, honor, and a kingdom, that the peoples, nations, and language groups should all serve him.
Jesus claimed over and over that he would be given a kingdom, which was heavenly, and which would have no end.
In fact, he called himself the “son of man” through the Gospel accounts. To argue that his disciples called him, as opposed to Jesus calling himself the “son of man”, is laughable because your own scripture vouches for the authenticity of the Gospel accounts we have today.
You cannot have your cake, and expect to eat it too.
@@MC-sd1uy it doesnt
@dr night,
Just to say “it doesn’t” it does not refute my argument. Please try again.
Bible is 100 % accurate. Qur'an testifies it.
Muhammad never saw uthmanic codex. Just buried islam.
Prove that Muhammad saw a manuscript. Even if he saw, he was illiterate.
BTW who wrote the Islamic injeel, anyone piece of injeel. Did isa saw the injeel?
Bukhari never visited mecca.
Keep on burying islam.
When you learn how to make arguments and understand them, then you can come try again. Jesus never preached a biography of himself, Quran is the actual words of God the prophet recited, that is the difference.
@@WeAreGhuraba u took a detour of a 1000 miles from my points and address something else it looks funny. Anyway I ll follow ur path. Jesus never preached a biography of himself, ok. So what?? But whatever was preached , was written by his apostles. What about your Islamic injeel , was it written down, what is the contents ? Is it what Isa preached?
Next about the quran, well you claim or believe it was from God. U can believe that all u want.
In the quran revealed by Allah, why do you find mentions of Muhammad s life like 33:6, 33:37, 33:50, 33:53, surah 66:1, surah 9, surah regarding Abu Lahab and many more. Is it not incidents from Muhammad s life.
Did Allah reveal Muhammad s biography to Muhammad. Did Muhammad teach his followers his own life incidents as revelation. U have an answer??
@@Jeezkv This is the second time now where you make a bad argument, I respond with arguments on topic and respond back with an accusation of not understanding or "making a detour". Do you not see how bad your arguments are? It's evidence you don't understand what people are saying.
@@Jeezkv Mark wasn't an apostle, Matthew and Luke copied from Mark, John came last and differs greatly from the previous 3 gospels. None of them are first hand witness accounts and none of them claim to be, nor do they claim it's divine inspiration. The gospel accounts were named only in the 2nd century and come 60-100 years after Jesus was gone with the full manuscripts being only in the 4th century. Quran came 6th century and was mass transmitted through memorization by hundreds and thousands of companions, today in the 10s of millions. It was also written down, it was transmitted in two ways and available to everyone but the layman was not allowed to read the Bible without the churches authority and only accessible to the elite.
@@Jeezkv Do you even know what a biography is? The gospel themselves describe it as the life and teachings of Jesus. Quran addressed and answered questions and situations live when they happened. Learn what a biography is first.
i can not begin to understand how some people believe in the lies of the Quran, the Bible is truth because we have many Prophets who walked with Jesus and who testify about Jesus. But Muhammad came seven hundred years after Jesus. But with Muhammad, one has to take his word only, because there is no other prove ,that he met an Angel in a cave. So this is a bit like? this other story in the Quran that says that Muhammad, he flew on a donkey from Medina to Jerusalem? and the only witness was the donkey. So how can one believe the testimony of one man. No way
Regarding Islam, I'm slowly learning about the beliefs of Muslims. And I've never read the Quran, although I've been listening to Blogging Theology for over 2 years. But I'm aware of some of the Quranic verses.
Anyhow, I'm just a simple Christian believer. I still stand on the foundational aspects of Christianity which are the Incarnation of Jesus, His crucifixion and His resurrection.
But since I'm not infallible, the truth about Jesus doesn't depend on me ! Only God is all-knowing.
So I try to respect Muslims and listen carefully.
By the way, I'm not trying to negate your views. Have you read the Quran?
Respectfully from Florida USA
God bless...
@@johnbrzykcy3076 yes i have? and it contradicts everything with what the Bible says. And one can not have one foot on the Bible, and one foot on the Quran, because your salvation is at stake. And by the way i respect the Muslims as well, but not their false religion. God bless brother
Even Qur'an is not a word of God,still it reveals some truth like Bible is word of God and not corrupted
I mean look how silly your line of questioning is, unlike you, the very disciples of prophet Muhammad conquered the world, that is how relevant and real they were. You on the other hand don't have a single primary witness to any event, and the gospels themselves were only given a name in the 2nd century. Witnesses is not the important thing, it is the message and which makes more sense. Stop worshipping human beings and come back to worshipping the Creator alone.
@@thetruth871 I appreciate your honesty. Please keep me in prayer because I feel like I've been "sitting on the fence" for too long. I need to have more discipline and a stronger faith in what Jesus accomplished for me on the cross.
God bless you and your family
Respectfully from Florida USA
The Son of Man in Daniel 7 reigns over all nations for eternity and is worshipped by all. This is clearly Jesus Christ at his second coming. This is what it means to be the Messiah Son of God. You are just contradicting the Bible for no reason other than what you want to be true.
Shut up peter :D
Wrong. The figure in Daniel 7 is described as “one LIKE, A son of man” - i.e. a human-like figure (bar enash in Aramaic). Nothing to do with an actual title, but a description.
Moreover, the son of man figure APPROACHES the “Ancient of Days” who is God. Thus he himself cannot be God. Additionally, he is GIVEN kingdom & glory, whereas God owns it from eternity past.
Finally, you fail to actually read the interpretation of the vision given by the Angel to Daniel himself-which is that the glorified figure he saw represented the “SAINTS OF THE MOST HIGH” (i.e. the righteous believers-plural-who would stay on the side of God & follow His law till the end).
Christians like yourself ignore these blatant & obvious facts in order to promote what the Church has taught you. But as the Qur’an aptly says:
_”And when they are told, ‘Follow what God has revealed!’ they say, ‘No, we will instead follow what we found our ancestors upon!’ - Yet what if their ancestors never thought through anything, nor were on the right direction?”_ ~ _The Qur’an 2:170_
I pray that you repent & serve God alone-who is both Christ’s Lord and your Lord.
_”The MOST important commandment is this,” Jesus answered: “Hear O Israel! The Lord our God, the Lord is ONE!”_ ~ The Gospel of Mark 12:29
@@agp4580 No, don’t tell him to shut up. Speak to people with respect brother. This is what the Qur’an teaches us:
“Invite to the way of your Lord with wisdom and good advice, and debate with them in the most polite & dignified manner.” ~ Qur’an 16:125
Peace.
@@celestialknight2339 I’ve talked to this guy before many times and have corrected him many times. He chooses to be delusional and thicker than a brick wall. He comments on every single Islamic post religiously. He doesn’t deserve actual replies, dismissing his comments is more effective.
@@agp4580 exasperation & frustration lead us humans to speak unwisely , yet still The Final Messenger on Whom is Peace was Himself confronted with worse types , yet Allaah SwTA Counsels The Messenger Himself , & therefore us too , that after we have exerted ourselves in inviting to Al Islam with courtesy & wisdom & reason then when the wilfully arrogant ,stubborn & wilfully ignorant persist , then we say Peace & move on , leave them to their ways
Paul, what are you doing making Dr. Ali broadcast from an alleyway?
5:68. The Torah and Injeel were preserved in Muhammad's day. Either that or Allah would have no reason to exhort Jews and Christians to follow their own scriptures. So it seems that either Dr.Ali is confused, or the Qur'an is wrong.
Or perhaps could you explain what 5:68 is supposed to mean if both Torah and Injeel are both corrupted.
I appreciate your honesty but what exactly do you think the "Injeel" was ?
It seems like Muslims have a different idea regarding the "Injeel".
I could be wrong because I'm not Muslim. I'm a simple Christian believer.
Again, I appreciate your comments.
God bless...
@@johnbrzykcy3076 The Injeel and Gospel are synonymous, according to the earliest Islamic understanding. However, the Qur'an treats all things as "books", and since the Christian Gospel was, and is, understood to be contained in the New Testament, it's reasonable to say that the NT is the Injeel written down. This is the implication of 5:68 - if Christians are supposed to stand on the Injeel/Gospel, then they should have it to hand. Which they did. But the narrative that the Bible has been corrupted contradicts this, which causes problems.
@@mikehutton3937 I appreciate your clarification. I've heard various interpretations of the "Injeel" from different Muslims so I'm still confused.
But such is life. Most important to me is listening to and following Jesus' example as demonstrated in the Gospels. I think God understands our hearts and our doubts.
God bless you and your family.
Ali Atai never care to question the historicity or authority of gospel, because you did. So you just rejected Allah s knowledge who confirms the gospel which was with the Christians during the 7th century.
I want to you to just refute Allah daily like this
That is a strawman, since you believe we were inspired by satan anyways, that means you believe satan confirmed your scriptures hahaha
@@WeAreGhuraba I dont believe anything in the quran. U believe in it, so u can't claim previous scriptures are not reliable. Atleast understand what is the point being made here
@@Jeezkv clearly you don't understand the argument, it is a self inflicted own, in depending on this straw man argument we don't believe, you end up creating your own dilemma, it is basic logical followup, try keeping up.
Hahaha! You quibble about the historical accuracy of the Gospels but believe the Quran which teaches that the sun sets in a muddy puddle. Soooo accurate. Even Paul Williams believes it. - Quran 18:83-86-"And they ask you about Dhul-Qarnain. Say: “I shall recite to you something of his story.” Verily, We established him in the earth, and We gave him the means of everything. So he followed a way. Until, when he reached the setting place of the sun, he found it setting in a spring of black muddy (or hot) water. And he found near it a people." This is indisputably confirmed by Sunan Abu Dawud 3991-"Abu Dharr said: I was sitting behind the Apostle of Allah who was riding a donkey while the sun was setting. He asked: Do you know where this sets? I replied: Allah and his Apostle know best. He said: It sets in a spring of warm water." "Allah and his Apostle know best" - oh yes they know. I think you need to get your own foundationless house in order before you quibble about others.
Dr Ali why do you think that "The Mad Mamluks" deleted episode 137? Why are you comparing apples and pears with "al Fatiha" and "Matthew"? One is supposedly the *dictated* "word of God" and the other the "inspired word of 'God'" written after the fact, I thought you were better than that! What happened to the idea that the "Gospels" could have "revealed" in Greek? I stopped listening at around @4:25 as you struck me as being as dishonest as !
Br Paul, kindly burden Dr. ALI with more long podcast less he die with his knowledge. The world need his knowledge
👍🏻
❤