You're doing exactly what I want to do. I'm so glad I found your channel, I hope you continue producing content. I also bought Canon R10 with kit lens 15-45 2 weeks ago. I'm currently purchasing extra equipment. I bought 2 tripods, small and big , nifty 50 and parasoley, shotgun mic, extra battery and sd card. I also want one of the 24-70 lenses, but it's a little out of my budget 😅 I'll probably buy the RF-S 10-18mm as my next lens. I'm a teacher so I need a wide angle shots for the 20 kids in the class 😅 Also for wideangle landscapes. Anyway, I really like the content you make. They guide me well. Thank you much ☺
Hey Thank you so much! I hope you will achieve the same or more! 🥰 Btw thats a Nice setup already. Yep the sigma 24-70 was expensive. BUT! Did you check out the new sigma native RF 18-50mm 2.8 around 650$. I want to check that lens out too at some point. I will definitely come up more videos! 📽️
@@reyesproductionDK Actually yes i did search for that lens quite a lot. Only downside is that lans has no "IS". Sure 10-18 has bad aperture but there is no other "kinda" budget lens with IS for wideangle except rfs 10-18. I need that lens first because I shoot a lot handheld videos. And that sigma 18-50 or a used 24-70 will probably be the third lens I buy. ☺
@mustafagurel1545 yeah I absolutely understand that! I have stabilizer in the lens But my setup is so heavy alone, I wouldnt need that stabilizer anyways. 😁 I recommend to rig It out a bit heavier so It will make really good handheld results. (I mean If you do videos) for photo i just use the lens and body alone.
@@reyesproductionDK Yes i saw your setup, it looks quite heavy 😅 Thank you, now i think maybe i can buy 18 50 with a smallrig first. kit lens already has IS maybe ı can get by with it a bit 😁
Your content is great. I am also a beginner and bought r10 last year but didn't get time to do much with it. I am more into videography, can you suggest best beginner level lens and gear setup to start on short videos?
I am also more like video than photo. 🫡 I just do some videos like this for the ones who like photos 😁 I would recommend to check out the new SIGMA 18-50mm f/2.8 RF lens. It’s not that expensive and has native RF mount so you dont need adapter for It. And this Range is pretty cool for video. But I Think you can make videos with any lens. A kit lens is also fine But because of the f value on that it’s hard to Expose correctly. Especially If you shoot inside. You need light 😏
@@reyesproductionDK i have 18-150 mm kit lens and 50 mm prime lens currently. I liked your video's colour grading. Are you designing sound tracks on your own or using any third party? Are you using any luts ? I don't have much knowledge about camera settings but most of the times I use auto but that output more contrast sometimes
@@lovykaul724 Oh, cool! I think you are more than fine with those lenses for now! I would spend more time to know the camera and the settings in manual mode. That would be a huge step! Yeah, I'm editing my videos from the beginning. Colorgrade, music, sound effects. Right now i use sounds from EpidemicSound (paid site) and colorgrading in Davinci Resolve. But because of your comments i think i should start a series from the beginning. To help you and others. I am just waiting to move my next place where i build my studio so i'll have the time to make videos on a regular basis again.
Just bought my canon R10 (thanks your video with R10 and 24-70mm 😁) w 50mm 1.8 two weeks ago, now I'm only waiting on the filters yet to come. I love the quality of photos coming out with your lens and now you've made me want to buy this lens too 😄 but I'll wait a little more since I just started my journey into photography (also my wallet lost weight). Love your photography style and colors!
I will definitely do that in my next videos! And if I have time I will also write down the settings for this video in a pinned comment! 🤝 Thank you for asking! 😇
Hey. As you can see handheld is solved. Already have lens support. And If I switc to stanilizer, my gimbal has a baseplate with a small built in Y shape lens support in the baseplate of the gimbal. A Smart thing 😁 (ZHIYUN weebil s)
Oh i am stupid. I thought you commented on my rig video >< Yeah. The lens is super heavy (around 1.2 KG) but i picked a gimbal which can take a heavier setup. I found some article where they say it can hold a 3.5 kg setup. So i had no problem with setting up on a gimbal so far.
@@reyesproductionDK Thanks brother, I recently bought the Sigma 18-55 f 2.8 RF. I was about to buy the 24-70, but because of the adapter and the weight, I opted for the Sigma 18-55. Do you think good work can be done with this Sigma 18-50 2.8 lens?
@@andresvanegas3085 Damnnn. Good choice. Of course you can do a great job with it! My lens is super great, brutal quality but 2x more expensive than the 18-55 rf. If i could go back in time and sigma rf lenses would exist back then i would also go for it. Cheaper, smaller, lighter. But the quality is top notch! So great work. Let me know how you like the new RF line with SIGMA!
Hello sir I had a doubt. I had an rfs18-150 3.5-6.3 with my Canon R10 and unfortunately, I broke it and the repair costs come near to the new lens cost. So I'd like to get an upgrade. Considering an L series lens the 24-105 f4 but Im not sure if it's compatible on my mount. If it is how the aperture range change?. i want something stable for video
Sad to hear. :/ you mean 24-105? I only now that not 150. Btw If it’s RF mount, you can easily adapt on the r10. If it’s EF mount, you need an EF to RF adapter. If it’s 24-105 f4 then the Aperture is f4 all the way zoomed in and out. It’s a Nice lens But for me, for video the f4 wouldnt be enough. Rather get an f 2.8 (But this lens would be a Nice upgrade for you, from the kit lens!
@@reyesproductionDK do you think the new sigma 18-50 2.8 dcdn is good for videography. i don't have a gimbal , so for videography I can get the sigma and the gimbal and still save enough money. do you think its a better option compared to 24-105 f4?
Yeah it is a hard question! It depends on what do you want to do. The sigma + gimbal would be a nice combo. But if you pick the 24-105 f4, you have to learn to make really good handheld. (And if you do, you will be king ;) ) I have a gimbal but i don't use it so much. Unless you working with the camera everyday all day i would pick the 24-105 instead. You won't use the gimbal as much as you think. And do you want to limit yourself like everytime you want to shoot, you need the gimbal? Btw, if you learn, you will learn everything and you can make good videos with any gear! If you have the budget pick anything you want. The SIGMA is good because it's native RF lens, no adapter needed. Small, lightweight. The 24-105 is a bigger, heavier. And have better range. What do you want to shoot btw?
I would love to have that sweet 24-70 Sigma lens for my Canon R10, but its really expensive, i hope i can afford that new 18-50 F2.8 Sigma in the future Great video!
Yeah this lens is a beast But very expensive. Even for me 😂 But I was a little bit snob with this lens. If I could go back I would Still Pick 24-70 because it’s a very versatile lens for video also But Maybe a cheaper tamron or something!
@@reyesproductionDK Yeah I saw it around that price too! But it’s not available in Mexico at the time, so the price goes a little bit up, but I will get it as soon as as I can!
Oh.. Sorry if i clickbait you! :D The R10 is considered as a cheap, beginner level camera. I agree that it's more expensive than your phone or something! And as you can see i can't afford anything else also! :D So i understand you with the 1000Eur price. The lens is around 1100 also. That's why i said that :D
@@reyesproductionDK yeh the prices are insane. I just started photography too and bought the R10. So far it's a nice experience and totally worth it as an entry level camera, to get comfortable with photography. Will upgrade the lens soon - the kit lens does it's job so far 😅
@@reyesproductionDK ah, ty for the info! Will check it out! So third party lenses like sigma start to produce for the RF mounts ? Or do I have to get an adapter first ?
@@isozarr YES THEY DO! That's a huge news with Sigma. 6 new lenses for RF mount without adapters.: www.sigma-global.com/en/contents/sigma_rfmount_lenses/ And the price is pretty good for it. (Just the 18-50mm is out right now but they are coming this year)
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
You're doing exactly what I want to do. I'm so glad I found your channel, I hope you continue producing content. I also bought Canon R10 with kit lens 15-45 2 weeks ago. I'm currently purchasing extra equipment. I bought 2 tripods, small and big , nifty 50 and parasoley, shotgun mic, extra battery and sd card. I also want one of the 24-70 lenses, but it's a little out of my budget 😅 I'll probably buy the RF-S 10-18mm as my next lens. I'm a teacher so I need a wide angle shots for the 20 kids in the class 😅 Also for wideangle landscapes. Anyway, I really like the content you make. They guide me well. Thank you much ☺
Hey Thank you so much! I hope you will achieve the same or more! 🥰
Btw thats a Nice setup already.
Yep the sigma 24-70 was expensive. BUT! Did you check out the new sigma native RF 18-50mm 2.8 around 650$. I want to check that lens out too at some point.
I will definitely come up more videos! 📽️
@@reyesproductionDK Actually yes i did search for that lens quite a lot. Only downside is that lans has no "IS". Sure 10-18 has bad aperture but there is no other "kinda" budget lens with IS for wideangle except rfs 10-18. I need that lens first because I shoot a lot handheld videos. And that sigma 18-50 or a used 24-70 will probably be the third lens I buy. ☺
@mustafagurel1545 yeah I absolutely understand that!
I have stabilizer in the lens But my setup is so heavy alone, I wouldnt need that stabilizer anyways. 😁
I recommend to rig It out a bit heavier so It will make really good handheld results.
(I mean If you do videos) for photo i just use the lens and body alone.
@@reyesproductionDK Yes i saw your setup, it looks quite heavy 😅 Thank you, now i think maybe i can buy 18 50 with a smallrig first. kit lens already has IS maybe ı can get by with it a bit 😁
Your content is great. I am also a beginner and bought r10 last year but didn't get time to do much with it. I am more into videography, can you suggest best beginner level lens and gear setup to start on short videos?
I am also more like video than photo. 🫡 I just do some videos like this for the ones who like photos 😁
I would recommend to check out the new SIGMA 18-50mm f/2.8 RF lens.
It’s not that expensive and has native RF mount so you dont need adapter for It. And this Range is pretty cool for video.
But I Think you can make videos with any lens.
A kit lens is also fine But because of the f value on that it’s hard to Expose correctly. Especially If you shoot inside. You need light 😏
@@reyesproductionDK i have 18-150 mm kit lens and 50 mm prime lens currently. I liked your video's colour grading. Are you designing sound tracks on your own or using any third party? Are you using any luts ?
I don't have much knowledge about camera settings but most of the times I use auto but that output more contrast sometimes
@@lovykaul724 Oh, cool! I think you are more than fine with those lenses for now!
I would spend more time to know the camera and the settings in manual mode. That would be a huge step!
Yeah, I'm editing my videos from the beginning. Colorgrade, music, sound effects. Right now i use sounds from EpidemicSound (paid site) and colorgrading in Davinci Resolve.
But because of your comments i think i should start a series from the beginning. To help you and others.
I am just waiting to move my next place where i build my studio so i'll have the time to make videos on a regular basis again.
Just bought my canon R10 (thanks your video with R10 and 24-70mm 😁) w 50mm 1.8 two weeks ago, now I'm only waiting on the filters yet to come. I love the quality of photos coming out with your lens and now you've made me want to buy this lens too 😄 but I'll wait a little more since I just started my journey into photography (also my wallet lost weight). Love your photography style and colors!
Thank youu! The 50mm 1.8 is also pretty good! You will be surprised, just wait! 😇 only the Zoom capability missing 😄
Can you also mention the zoom level, shutter speed in your clicked pictures .
I will definitely do that in my next videos!
And if I have time I will also write down the settings for this video in a pinned comment! 🤝
Thank you for asking! 😇
Friend, when mounting the camera with this lens on your stabilizer, have you had any problems due to the weight of the lens?
Hey. As you can see handheld is solved. Already have lens support.
And If I switc to stanilizer, my gimbal has a baseplate with a small built in Y shape lens support in the baseplate of the gimbal. A Smart thing 😁
(ZHIYUN weebil s)
Oh i am stupid. I thought you commented on my rig video ><
Yeah. The lens is super heavy (around 1.2 KG) but i picked a gimbal which can take a heavier setup. I found some article where they say it can hold a 3.5 kg setup.
So i had no problem with setting up on a gimbal so far.
@@reyesproductionDK Thanks brother,
I recently bought the Sigma 18-55 f 2.8 RF. I was about to buy the 24-70, but because of the adapter and the weight,
I opted for the Sigma 18-55.
Do you think good work can be done with this Sigma 18-50 2.8 lens?
@@andresvanegas3085 Damnnn. Good choice. Of course you can do a great job with it!
My lens is super great, brutal quality but 2x more expensive than the 18-55 rf. If i could go back in time and sigma rf lenses would exist back then i would also go for it.
Cheaper, smaller, lighter. But the quality is top notch! So great work. Let me know how you like the new RF line with SIGMA!
nice video！i would like to ask whether I should wait for the new sigma prime lens for 35 or 50 f1.4, for only a budget under 500 dollars
Thank you! Well it’s hard, my personal opinion I would go for the 35 instead of 50mm
Hello sir I had a doubt.
I had an rfs18-150 3.5-6.3 with my Canon R10 and unfortunately, I broke it and the repair costs come near to the new lens cost. So I'd like to get an upgrade. Considering an L series lens the 24-105 f4 but Im not sure if it's compatible on my mount. If it is how the aperture range change?. i want something stable for video
Sad to hear. :/ you mean 24-105? I only now that not 150.
Btw If it’s RF mount, you can easily adapt on the r10. If it’s EF mount, you need an EF to RF adapter.
If it’s 24-105 f4 then the Aperture is f4 all the way zoomed in and out. It’s a Nice lens But for me, for video the f4 wouldnt be enough. Rather get an f 2.8
(But this lens would be a Nice upgrade for you, from the kit lens!
@@reyesproductionDK do you think the new sigma 18-50 2.8 dcdn is good for videography. i don't have a gimbal , so for videography I can get the sigma and the gimbal and still save enough money. do you think its a better option compared to 24-105 f4?
Yeah it is a hard question!
It depends on what do you want to do. The sigma + gimbal would be a nice combo.
But if you pick the 24-105 f4, you have to learn to make really good handheld. (And if you do, you will be king ;) )
I have a gimbal but i don't use it so much. Unless you working with the camera everyday all day i would pick the 24-105 instead.
You won't use the gimbal as much as you think. And do you want to limit yourself like everytime you want to shoot, you need the gimbal?
Btw, if you learn, you will learn everything and you can make good videos with any gear! If you have the budget pick anything you want.
The SIGMA is good because it's native RF lens, no adapter needed. Small, lightweight.
The 24-105 is a bigger, heavier. And have better range.
What do you want to shoot btw?
I would love to have that sweet 24-70 Sigma lens for my Canon R10, but its really expensive, i hope i can afford that new 18-50 F2.8 Sigma in the future
Great video!
Yeah this lens is a beast But very expensive. Even for me 😂 But I was a little bit snob with this lens. If I could go back I would Still Pick 24-70 because it’s a very versatile lens for video also But Maybe a cheaper tamron or something!
I saw the new sigma 18-50 around 650usd.
@@reyesproductionDK Yeah I saw it around that price too!
But it’s not available in Mexico at the time, so the price goes a little bit up, but I will get it as soon as as I can!
@INFChiquito ooh I see! We will see. I would love to try them out thats sure 😂
"cheap body" - around 1000€. Ok. *cry *
Oh.. Sorry if i clickbait you! :D
The R10 is considered as a cheap, beginner level camera. I agree that it's more expensive than your phone or something! And as you can see i can't afford anything else also! :D
So i understand you with the 1000Eur price.
The lens is around 1100 also. That's why i said that :D
@@reyesproductionDK yeh the prices are insane. I just started photography too and bought the R10. So far it's a nice experience and totally worth it as an entry level camera, to get comfortable with photography. Will upgrade the lens soon - the kit lens does it's job so far 😅
@@isozarr Oh, cool! Have fun. I recommend to check out SIGMA new RF mount lenses! It's much cheaper. 600-700 eur the new 18-50mm f.28
@@reyesproductionDK ah, ty for the info! Will check it out!
So third party lenses like sigma start to produce for the RF mounts ? Or do I have to get an adapter first ?
@@isozarr YES THEY DO!
That's a huge news with Sigma. 6 new lenses for RF mount without adapters.:
www.sigma-global.com/en/contents/sigma_rfmount_lenses/
And the price is pretty good for it. (Just the 18-50mm is out right now but they are coming this year)