California's assault weapons ban could soon be overturned: Here's what that means
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 фев 2025
- As early as this week, a federal judge could once again rule to overturn California's longstanding ban on assault weapons. abc7ne.ws/3ShaXgr
#assaultweapons #guns #gavinnewsom #california #politics #JudgeRogerBenitez #abc7news
I wonder if Newsome's private security is carrying muskets?
Sling shots, they can only carry 9 rocks.
Nerf guns
All the chp officers that guard his neighborhood carry ar-15s…
Franklin Armory CA320's; single shots!
@@BrandensOutdoorChannel hopefully the bs roster is about to get tossed too 🤞
Finally we have American judges siding with civil rights
A judge following the Constitution? What a concept in California.
St Roger Thomas Benitez
I own more guns then you and non are assault weapons. This is gross 🤢
@@coverts2962 Firearm ownership is a civil right whether you agree with it or not.
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
We need more judges like Benitez
_Particularly_ in the 9th Circuit.
Benitez is truly an American Hero!
St. Benitez 👼
God bless
St.Benitez 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Gun control is like trying to prevent drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars!
@Alex But not all drivers are drunks!
@Alex well duh we’re not born with intoxicants in our bodies
@Alex The vast majority of people who are drunk don't drive. Yet we don't require interlock breathalyzer for every single car. That's the same for gun control.
I always say gun control is like cutting every single man's appendage off because a select few rape people.
Newsome and his ilk will have you cut off roscoe because some men are rapers. Lunatic Left.
Disarming the citizens while criminals revolving door for perps
If you vote emotionally, then you would ban guns because it "would take guns off the streets".
If you vote logically, then you would see the fact of the matter is that criminals don't give a flying fork about the laws.
Saw a news article THIS YEAR about a violent convict let out on bail, bought a stolen gun hours later, and then murdered a member of law enforcement in a traffic stop within the week (I do not recall the precise details since I chalked it up to liberal judges)
Edit: I found the article but youtube won't allow hyperlinks. Look up Selma Police Officer Carrasco from California for the article.
Newsom might as well hang a sign at the CA border telling criminals the entire state is a gun free zone.
all part of the "fundamental transformation"
@@JohnDoe-ew3xt That the elites deem necessary.
@@JohnDoe-ew3xt Barack Milhouse Obama?
I think I’ll be naming my first child Roger Benitez. God bless America 🇺🇸
That’s great! Roger T. Get over here😂
be careful with your wish. LOL
And that's what you get you needed to be knocked off of your high-horse who-do-you-think-you-are God. Hahaha
Awesome name!
Saint B! Bless
👏 Judge Benitez. Finally, a judge with balls!
If you don't like guns, don't get one. Easy solution.
@Alex guns have nothing to do with abortion
@Alex I'm pro-choice, but I agree with the OP.
I don't want you to have one either
@Alex There's no constitutional amendment protecting killing a baby. That's why Roe VS Wade was overturned. Even Ginsberg said it was unconstitutional. We just had to get the Baby Boomers out of the way to fix it.
Alex- Abortion always results in a death
We'll soon be able to enjoy some of the freedoms that Americans have.
LMAO
@@ENTJ47 keep laughing and move back to China.
@@CaliSteve169 LMAO
@@ENTJ47 buying another gun tomorrow. Will name it Garvin.
@@CaliSteve169 go for it lol
God bless you St. Benitez!
Don't tread on the US Constitution🐍
@@coverts2962 Always has its written in place for a reason.
So if the constitution banned alcohol again, do u think it still shouldn’t be tread?
"Don't step on the sneke"
@@godzilla101188 prohibition was orchestrated by psych'0'F'eminists.. the same people who want to smash our guns like kegs of beer..lol
My body.. my choice of weapon to protect it.
Stay out of my gun closet!
US Constitution > Governor Haircut
I like Newsom most when he's not around.
God bless saint Benitez
Thank you Saint Benitez!!!
Newsom demands those below him (right down to the citizens) must obey him. But when he doesn't like a ruling from above him, he simply ignores it. That attitude wears away at respect for law and order.
I think he could switch places with Trudeau and no one could tell the difference.
Also, invoking the governor's use of the word, perverse, the only thing perverse is his rhetorical blather.
Dude has a habit of overturning votes of the American people.
God bless the Honorable Judge Benitez
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Looking forward to Judge Benitez’ ruling. Not looking forward to see how California’s “leaders” are going to waste our time and money again.
if they can spend one million $ on a public toilet, I'm sure they'll throw several billions of stolen taxpayer $ to maintain their tyrannical control over firearms.
When they do we need to Vote No. Saint Benitez 🎉 for president.
Thank God for good Judges like him
Great news.
Shame on the state attorneys who defend that putting a fin grip on the rifle makes it Not "assault" those attorneys are all lost souls.
Shame on the people who keep voting for him.
They don’t defend the fin grips, they don’t even like that workaround
Not to mention any 10 yr old with dremel or a hammer can smash it off.
That's why they need our prayer.
@@POSTMASTER_Rion-Donald_Harmon. Or you could unscrew the whole grip and put a regular on that you bought from a gun store in California
what's crazy is a judge can get rid of restrictions, but we still have to wait years even when a judge rules for the 2a. That is so backwards.
I'm not waiting. You shouldn't either.
You don't have to wait. The day the judge rules, the law is void.
Judge Benitez for governor 😎💪🤘
My thumbs down is because he can help protect the rights of Californians better by his rulings on the bench instead of hoping that his veto would stand in the governor's office.
@@dwayne7356 good point
we can has .50 cal again??😹
"Judge Benitez for governor" ... yes .
Thank you Benitez! Hands 🙌🏾
It could very well be over after the ruling. The ninth already heard it once and used the 2 step approach. They now know they can’t do it and could deny a appeal from the state. The ninth knows it’s a losing battle now
But they always love to delay things as much as possible
Yeah, what is this dude saying that nothing will change in the foreseeable future?
The bruen decision overrules the two-step approach now, however, that has yet to be enforced as Illinois just had a judge defer to the old method to get her preferable outcome of upholding a ban.
It’ll probably be years before the rulings are overturned with as slow as the system works.
And equating parchment and quill and the printing press with speech on TV, radio, and the internet is "perverse" too. That's some sound legal thinking there...
Technology changes. Rights don't.
@@CaliSteve169 AR15 = modern musket
@@TransitionSF actually M16 = modern musket. Full auto should be 100% legal.
@@CaliSteve169 Yep. There is nothing in the 2nd amendment that allows for banning the same guns that the US Army has.
Your my hero Benitez!!
I hope the same would be for Illinois!
Well when it eventually gets back to the Supreme Court, the decision there will end the ban in Illinois. And btw, the Supreme Court ruled that stun guns couldn’t be banned because they were “in common use” and the estimated ownership at the time of the decision was 20 thousand. So I can’t foresee a way that the AR-15 with over 80 million in civilian ownership could possibly not be ruled in common use
@@sethrockwoodits not gonna be won on common use it will be won on equal rights you can’t carve out for law enforcement but ban it for everyone else
@@BLEACH366 that stipulation has more to do with retired law enforcement than active….not that I disagree…..frankly, the second amendment protects commonly used military weapons so that private citizens have weapons that would be useful in a military conflict against a modern military. It was written that way intentionally, but that fact has been ignored for years….so much so that you can’t listen to any kind of gun law debate without hearing the phrase “weapons of war” as if somehow that should make the weapons illegal. At the end of the day, these laws are unconstitutional by a plethora of different constitutional measurements. Which one will be the reason for eventually overturning the laws….your guess is as good as myne
@@sethrockwood no it doesn’t its for both and active military but not vets and thats what its gonna be won on just like i said
Isn’t that a sign…your laws being pushed to the Supreme Court..maybe that should be a sign of how wrong the current laws are.
Good and finally
Why is it that so many of these politicians in office who took an oath to uphold the constitution don’t seem to know anything about it? *How hard is it to understand “shall not be infringed”?*
They understand it fully, that`s why they are trying to destroy it.
Because they are redefining the meaning of words to justify their ideology. They redefined woman. Redefining militia to military is easy. Now it reads from a liberal POV as "in order to maintain a military, the rights of the government to bear arms shall not be infringed". They ignore the Bill of Rights was to restrict government.
Conservatives have to understand, that a big portion of our country now, has nearly 8 generations of people wanting government to be over them. To act like their parents. To take personal responsibility away from them for their actions, in everything from food, housing, education... to protection. Just ask any liberal if the police has to protect them... and they will say "yes". Despite SCOTUS saying that cops have no duty to protect them. Now cops just protect the stateists.
It’s not about them being stupid, it’s about them thinking you’re stupid enough to go along with them.
I’m looking at you Australia.
The 2A does NOT mention muskets or any type of firearms, only ARMS. The definition of ‘arms’bavk in 1791, was tools that can be used for defensive or offensive purposes. This definition includes d so ticks, stones, knives, FIREARMS, etc.
The irony of Newsom's statement is that swords existed in 1776 and is common use, but CA also has bans on them, too.
Our founding fathers didn't have muskets. They had rifles. The British had muskets. Rifles were the "assault weapons" of their time and the British wanted them out of the hands of their subjects. The people have ALWAYS had the right to possess the most advanced tools to defend themselves. Our founding fathers 100% knew that firearm technology would advance.
There were also 24 round semiautomatic Air rifles at the time, and they were brought in and showed to them in the halls of congress. They KNEW of the technology.
Let Gavin Gruesome give up his armed security detail (that Californians are coerced to pay for through taxes). Then we can talk about disarming law-abiding citizens in this environment of crime that his policies have burdened us all with.
Yeah, especially when we had to pay a couple of them when they drove to/from Montana or Wyoming as a armed protection detail when Nuisance was at his wife's family's ranch.
There will be no "talk" of disarming law abiding citizens. There are no compromises in the 2A to be made.
That's 20% of the State police, and 60% of their state police funding to gruesome. The tyrants want those they wish to control disarmed. While wanting their government to be the solution to all the problems, they always need more money to fix but never do.
@@SFPhilo Yup, SFPD for his wedding in MT when he was mayor.
Claiming the 2nd Amendment should not protect modern sporting arms and was meant only for muskets, is like claiming the 1st Amendment should protect only that speech which was written by quill pens on parchment paper!
@Alex The Alien and Sedition Acts were allowed to expire. The Alien Friends Act of 1798 had nothing to do with citizens, but was aimed at non-citizens who were considered "dangerous to the safety and peace of the United States." The law was never enforced and it was allowed to expired after several years.
The Enemy Aliens Act was passed to supplement the Alien Friends Act. It is still in effect and was used extensively during World War II.
The Naturalization Act of 1798 increased the requirement for American citizenship from five years to fourteen years. It was repealed by the Naturalization Act of 1802.
The Sedition Act of 1798 was passed to make it illegal to make false or malicious statements against the Federal Government. It was aimed primarily at the critics of the Federalist Party, mainly the newspaper editors that supported then-Vice President Jefferson. Strangely, it did not apply to Vice President Jefferson, a rival of the Federalist Party President Adams. It was allowed to expire in 1802.
But, what does this have to do with gun control laws that violate the 2nd Amendment?
People need to stop restricting 2a to firearms, no where in the text does it say firearms. It’s always been arms, which covers anything you chose to use to protect yourself. Gun, knife, club, lamp, ashtray, air-filled syringe, brass knuckles, nunchucks, spears, throwing stars, all are covered by the 2nd amendment, if that’s what you chose to arm yourself with. I don’t know why we decided that only a single category of ranged weapon counts as 2a, all weapons are arms & therefore all weapons are covered
@Alex ah so your logic is, well if the founding fathers got one aspect of our rights wrong way back when, & constitutionalists like quoting the founding fathers, then I guess we’re required to agree with them 100%. Even the parts they got wrong? Makes perfect sense.
@Alex You just made a very good point about another reason why 2A restrictions should not be in place. They can be weaponized to criminalize rival political parties. We saw this during the BLM riots when liberals were passing out AR15 from the trunk of their Teslas in Seattle's CHOP with impunity while people like the McClouskys were arrested and charged for defending their home.
@@koobs4549 The main likely reason those opposed to armed citizens singled out firearms, as opposed to other forms of weaponry, is they are the most high profile and utile weapons available to the average person. They are also some of the simplest to learn and they are the one of the most economical forms of protection available to the average citizen. You get more bang for your buck with a firearm than with most other weapons. Wealthy elitists and their naive useful idiots have naturally primarily targeted firearm ownership as these are the weapons that tend to level the playing field against the wealthy elitists attempting to impose a modern feudal-like system of economic masters controlling economic serfs who live by the leave of the rich and powerful. An unarmed people are far easier to coerce into submission, than an armed and resistive populace.
Poor poor mr newsome, has to actually follow the restrictions set forth in his oath to the constitution.
Lol @ Newsom's "Large capacity magazine clips"
The scumbag claimed the JR15 Rimfire rifle was an assault rifle because it looked similar to an AR15. Newsom does not even know the laws on the books especially what his own party defined as an "assault rifle".
The Bruen decision did NOT "set" a "new standard". It reaffirmed what should have been obvious to people who can actually read.
Good. Newsom and his clown show need taken down a notch.
The assault weapons ban never made sense. The most of California's 100+ gun laws were never made to restrict criminals.
Good! The government needs to leave the people's rights alone!
I love how nothing to do with the 2nd ammendment can evolve in their eyes. They always bring up muskets while using the latest technology to express their 1st ammendment. I wonder why all other rights can be evolved for the things of today, just not guns.
lets go!
What’s really concerning is the absolute hissy fits Gavin throws when he doesn’t get his way. This dude is really, REALLY pressed he can’t control YOU the way he wants too.
I'm alright with this. The definition of "assault" weapons targets certain grips, stocks, barrel attachments, etc. This does nothing to really go after criminals or stop mass shootings and unfairly punishes law abiding gun owners.
God bless America and Saint Benitez
Yay! Thanks for the good news! I can’t wait for the gun ban to be over and to throw away that stupid plastic flap
Judge Benetiz knows what it's like to deal with a tyrannical government. I believe it is his mission to prevent this from happening here in this country. Thank you for your diligence in fighting the good fight. We as Americans have the right to defend ourselves from both foreign and domestic tyrannical mentalities. It's what this country was founded on. Dont tread on me!!!
The judge doesn’t consistently rule against California gun laws. He consistently rules in line with the constitution. A subtle but important difference.
So true. It’s the biased media.
All 50 States should be Constitutional Carry. The intent of the 2nd Amendment is for 18 year olds have private weapons and ammunition similar to what the military is armed with. To me this means armed with M-4 Carbines, 50 Caliber Sniper Rifles, 40mm Grenadine Launchers and Cannons.
18? It was common to get your first rifle when you were 10 a few decades ago…
@@hereforthechips7710 it’s up to parents to determine. We were shooting rats at a decommissioned dump when I was 5 without supervision. 2a says 18yoa to be called up for militia duty
@Alex Good idea for tanks just no nukes. Just RPG and small Chemical Weapons
@Alex Alex the commie is so mad. The salt of lefty tears is so very sweet.🧂🧂🧂🧂
@Bill Randleman If the WEF conducted a limited small yield Nuke attack on DC it’s possible things might get better. The WEF needs to look at the M.A.D response
A gun is a gun and a pitch fork a pitch fork. Both can be lethal. It's the handler that needs to be responsible.
Let Freedom Ring!!
Keep St. Benitez safe at all costs!
Last I checked, criminals and crazy people don't follow gun laws.
Of course they won’t 😂
Overturning unconstitutional laws are proper and correct…Every person in the USA should be REQUIRED to own and know how use an AR15….with proper training. Period.
Thank you Benitez
It's about time we see judges uphold Americans Constitutional rights!!!
Bless Saint Benitez!!!!!!
Can’t wait to feel like a real American again
Note to tyrants, this is what happened when you get greedy and push things too far.
Newsome is such a fool. Using the muskets talking point. The internet did not exist back then too yet we exercise our 1st amendment right none the less. Same with the 2A. Never give up your rights, ever.
As a strong supporter of civil rights, the right to possess firearms that are commonly owned throughout the United States is an individually-protected right, just as other civil rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights apply to individuals, also known as "the people". The second amendment should not be treated as a second class right, and I'm glad that this is being righted by the courts in small steps.
That would be a huge win for CA citizens!
If any judge overturns a law as unconstitutional, it should be immediately abolished until a higher court overturns it with a ruling or an injunction. The fact the legal system doesn't default to MORE freedom is despicable!
What’s really perverse is Gavin having private security armed with actual assault rifles while the common folk have no means of protection
It's about freaking time!!!
Just make murder illegal. Oh wait
Saint Benitez, standing up for the rights of the working class citizen! 🙌
Good I'm glad it's in "jeopardy" it's time the constitution is upheld, not chipped away at.
I didn’t even know the ban was in place….
That’s because it didn’t do anything. It served no purposed for curtailing crime or crazy people from being crazy.
Yeah because crime is still ridiculous
@thizmyblockbitch not sure but I think it’s when someone pulls out the 10 rd pin and you say “Walla! The magazine has been fixed!”
It’s eminent because it is unconstitutional. It’s about time this direct infringement on our rights is taken off the books
It's about time!!!!
Thank you judge Roger Benitez.
They’ll do something underhanded but boy do I like seeing Newsom upset.
"California may overturn gun ban." As a Texas liberal, let's HOPE people in California don't get vilified for owning an ArmaLite Rifle 15. (Yes, I said "liberal" and "ArmaLite Rifle" instead of "Auto" or "assault rifle".)
Saint Benitez God bless
whats sad is people think an assualt weapon ban made anything safe. just like gun free zone for school and look how well that turned out
I LOVE JUDGE BENITEZ
Muskets for citizens - AR-15's for Police. That's Gavin Newsom's CA.
SAINT BENITEZ
GIVE THE MAN THE RESPECT HE DESERVES
Be honest. Gun control laws don't work because criminals don't follow the law.
I'm all for coming to the table to discuss gun control if your private security, police and politicians agree to the same rules.
It is absolutely disgusting how all of this politicians break the law by creating all of these restrictions and violating the rights of so many citizens of this country and its even more disgusting how long it takes to get justice and that these people who violate you're rights never see consequences for that infringement
My body.. my choice of weapon to protect it.
Stay out of my gun closet!
So what does this mean for CA??? I can have a normal mag release and not require a maglock or stupid grip fin??? Stuff that people already have.
Correct. This is assuming that the next higher Court, the ninth circuit refuses to hear the case. Otherwise we will have to wait possibly years for that to play out
@@rmblwgn why? They already heard it like 15 times already
This AWB is like putting square wheels on your car because it can go over the speed limit. AR’s have been in common lawful use for a long time.
Good, now people can peotect themselves from criminals. The protection we should be getting from cops.
Yah sure let's give a 22 year old rookie LAPD cop a 9mm handgun and everyone else got fully auto street sweepers. It's not safe to be a cop anymore
For the people by the people you serve us we wont serve you
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
Don't overturn it just send all anti bill of rights to them and block it off from the U.S.A.
God Bless St. Benitez! Hello HK MR556A1!
You can buy one now but with a stupid fin grip
@@rmblwgn True.
Buy one now and be ready to un-neuter it once the ruling to affirm our rights is handed down.
@@drm6007 You bet!
God bless Judge Benitez 🙏❤️🇺🇸 He is our only hope here in California
Congratulations you guys!
Cheers from Chicago
"Equating AR-15's to muskets"? Hmmm. Well Mr Newsom, what were the most prevalent weapons the British used in 1770's ? Answer: Muskets. And in modern times, what is the most prevalent rifle in use by most armies ? Answer: AR-15 style rifles.
I’m proud of this comment section
“ Shall NOT be Infringed “
Someone need to give NEWSOM a tissue and a milk bottle.
A lobotomy would be better.
Thank god. Let freedom reign, let freedoms rain, thank God almighty, let freedom reign!!!
Good. Let freedom ring.