The UK care system is failing all of us | The New Statesman podcast
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 июн 2024
- Each one of us in the UK is likely to require care or become a carer at some point in our lives. But the UK’s social care system is failing all of us.
Subscribe here: / @newstatesman
Women have a 50:50 chance of caring by the time they are 46 and men by the time they reach the age of 57. Budget cuts and lack of resources is making caring harder.
Rachel Cunliffe, associate political editor of The New Statesman, is joined by Jess Prestidge from the Centre for Social Justice, and former BBC correspondent and family carer Humphrey Hawksley.
--
The New Statesman podcast is now on RUclips. Anoosh Chakelian and New Statesman colleagues including political editor Andrew Marr discuss the latest in UK politics news, helping you understand the forces shaping British politics today.
Watch all the latest episodes of the New Statesman podcast here: • The New Statesman Podcast
--
The New Statesman brings you unrivalled analysis of of the latest UK and international politics. On our RUclips channel you’ll find insight on the top news and global current affairs stories, as well as insightful interviews with politicians, advisers and leading political thinkers, to help you understand the political and economic forces shaping the world.
With regular contributions from our writers including Political Editor Andrew Marr and Anoosh Chakelian - host of the New Statesman podcast - we’ll help you understand the world of politics and global affairs from Westminster to Washington and beyond.
Subscribe on RUclips: / @newstatesman
Sign up to Morning Call, the daily UK politics newsletter from the New Statesman: morningcall.substack.com
Subscribe to the New Statesman from just £1 per week: www.newstatesman.com/podcasto...
It’s an absolute joke the care system.
Here's an idea instead of raising the carers allowance income limit to just £250 a week raise it to £300-350 a week, that means some carers will be able to work and earn enough to contribute taxes which on top of making their lives better will save everyone else money in taxes.
See the WHO and EU report: “Partnering with the EU to strengthen long-term care systems”. We’re on our own with this 🙄
My mum with cancer came home with a stoma and a catheter. She was unable to peform daily tasks for herself or get out of bed.
I was in my early 20s, and i had to communicate with her as to how i can help. I had no idea what i was doing.
She was in and out of confusion due to medication. I didnt know where to go for practical help.
We didn't need cash, we needed support
Our political system has changed radically since the days of Bevin. You still assume in this video that the state should and will fund both health and social care according to need. That ideal went out the window many decades ago; and successive governments have been dismantling those systems to privatise them, under our noses. ‘How to boil a frog’ = slowly heat the water so it doesn’t notice until it’s too late and it can’t jump out.
Looking after mt parents cost me about 25k in lost income over 4 years. That was not only income I had to live without but also pension contributions I couldnt make. At the very least the government could give carers contributions to a pension scheme so they don't have to worry about their future.
We need well regulated, de-institutionalised homes staffed and managed by professional, well paid carers, provided free of charge by the NHS.
NB: the argument that this costs too much is nonsensical. Money paid to NHS staff does not disappear from the economy!
Thanks for the video, will share it with other carers
Great that you are talking about this. However as a carer I see the problem to come for me when I need help. as a boomer I know there will be millions of us however we often have only one child who may or may not be able to care for me. Multiply that by the millions who will need care and the cost in 10-20 years will be beyond comprehension.
I think China is facing a similar problem: one child policy wasn’t thought through.
Use the saved money to support care for the patient. Support the nurses and encourage training at these levels.
It’s falling because people that do the hard work get paid very low income whilst the seniors managers anyone from 8b onwards get paid ridiculous salaries and have a job for life, even though they are not performing. They just get moved to NHS England. All these failed directors , all the levels of management are a waste of money .what do they do apart from attend endless meetings and suck up to each other. The Finance department , the operations department they should all be reviewed not by KPMG or Kingsley or any outside agent but based on performance. Trust me the amount of money you will save will be in hundreds of thousands. The doctors, nurses and lower grades employees run the NHS and get paid nothing. The people that sit the whole day get paid a lot for doing nothing. The public should ask for a review. After all it’s is public funding the supports the NHS
BENEFIT FROM IT..WHO ASKED FOR THIS ARCHAIC PROCEDURE IN THE FIRST PLACE ANYWAY !!
I know it will mean a vast cost to the Government in money to the NHS, but the care system being part of Local Government is not working. It is taking up so much of their budgets (60%) that they can't afford to provide other services that people pay for in their rates and many councils are going bankrupt.
Sold off
1:58 have your son who needs help at home with you, ffs . Dad..
Without watching I am going to assume that younger disabled people both able to work and not are excluded from this analysis, a routinely invisible and disregarded group whose human rights are breached as standard. This is a disgrace and NS has long been at fault over this. This lack of awareness, intelligence and humanity has been having a negative effect on all. Sort youselves out.
You can’t start your arguments with your son being alive because of higher survival rate and then say he would have had a home in victorian times. No, in these times your son would not be alive. That being said, this really needs to improve. It can’t be that unpaid family careers pick up the work because the right care is not available. Even worse that those who become carers will have a detrimental effect on their lives as health or poverty risks.
Yaah
If you have ever voted Conservative you should be banned from any assistance to do with care
👊👍
Creating specialized insurance structures around the well built financial system. Trying a more Singapore approach.
First comment!
I didn’t hear anywhere in this discussion of how much it would cost to fix these deficiencies.
You talk about the tax lost to the treasury when people don’t work because they are looking after someone, but you haven’t said how much it would cost the treasury to provide the support to allow a carer to go back to work.
This is because this New Statesman's podcast has a bad habit, quite visible as well in its coverage of Labour policies, to ignore critical information like this: how much would a policy cost and who ought to pay for it?
Can't start talking about anything which may lead to the notion of the rich paying more tax now, can we?
@@firefalcon124epic TBH its more interesting to hear the extent of the issue and the policy ideas being set out at this time. Given the monumental political blind spot around social care its good to hear the research data and ideas. Some radical change is necessary.
I am sorry, but you all come across as as entitled bleeding hearts.
I - like another 500,000 people in the UK have epilepsy. Serious for me - not all. My partner cares fulltime and we have chosen no job - just one income and no State support. We have been truly fortunate. Had to move a couple of times - again this year because my pension won't keep the house going. I'm tired but we try. No bleeding hearts. I hope you don't get into a similar medical mess. It happens to all - I cannot contemplate a care home. I want to die at home.
@@jtrevmSorry to hear of your condition. Just wondering if you & partner have a plan B in case they can no longer care for you, or need care for their self?
Thanks for letting everyone know.
@@lindaj5492 No plan B's. We seem to navigate what comes. Planning isn't possible. Commonsense, adaptability, and amazing grace are the hallmarks. Always questions of course as / if you think of the future. But we live for the day we have. Thank you for your question. That's care....
You turn off because they speak clearly and have an education? They are pushing on behalf of a group who are not politically active at all.