The ship got struck on it's starboard side and yet people believe it sank listing to port and- when it cracked- so much listed to port it almost completely capsized?! I find this modern theory to be hysterical.
@@brentbrent8918 bruh it actually listed to port the passengers even said it! Plus the list to port before she vanished caused it to pivot around and go vertical omg are u even updated😑
@@Mozee854 they probably weren’t but the survivors gave of their sides of the story supporting the younger theories. And science is a lot more advanced giving them more possibilities to be scientifically more accurate.
The 1995 version was partially shown in the 97 movie making me think even back then that a fully finished version would be shown in the end of the movie maybe showing a rust time-laps but ever since then I believed the whole idea got scrapped in favor of focusing on a fictional love story that whent South. Now A Night To Remember had an excuse not to even think of showing that because the because by 58 the wreck still had yet to be found. By 95-97 Cameron had no excuse since he was able to include the actual wreck had been long found and he was able to include it into his movie.
the 2013 footage is better, but this also just proves how really over the top people go with effects. there was no need for the flash backs, cut scenes and slow motion. music is shit too
the fuck is up with that bullshit editing on the 2013 part? I'm not experienced in video editing, but it doesn't take a chef to know when your food isn't cooked right.
I'm addicted to this ship!
U ain't the only one!
*I FEEL U FLYNN!*
Me too
I’m obsessed of her too!
Same
1995 might have not been accurate, but the animation looked so realistic
I like the 1995 one
Shingoji gaming theory is better.
But you can believe anything you want.
@@MilesTV2010 Miles^^ Thanks for supporting my theory^^ its not yet finished though and needs more proof and supporting details
The ship got struck on it's starboard side and yet people believe it sank listing to port and- when it cracked- so much listed to port it almost completely capsized?! I find this modern theory to be hysterical.
@@brentbrent8918 bruh it actually listed to port the passengers even said it! Plus the list to port before she vanished caused it to pivot around and go vertical omg are u even updated😑
pettery good video that you put together for the other peiple i liked the video and i liked the grapices that you put in it
is it me or do i love the Titanic and her 2 other sisters?
i do the same
Only titanic fan will now 3 popular ship Titanic, Britannic and Lusitania
@@accessdenied5615 Olympic?
@@wasquet god this comment is a year ago and im not a Titanic researcher anymore now
@@accessdenied5615 Wow, so bad, I used to like titanic before and i left it, now i like it more too
I love titanic
The stern is completely fuck up
"What a nice little simulation, the experience though was quite different"
Great animation. I never understood and still,don't understand how,a giant ship nicking an,iceberg could cause such a catastrophe.
Because its a passenger ship not an icebreaker.
its easy to understand... wdym
The 2013 theory does not work, the keel wouldn't hang on for that long without pulling the stern under, the 1995 one makes more sense.
Right!
Im assuming they couldnt animate it cause everything else in 2013 cgi is correct except that they both left out the stern imploding
Not really, the ship ship would probably have broken from the bottom-up in reality.
Also, neither of the animations show the stern section imploding.
the parts of the 1995 one looks like papers
2012 is much more acurate but i like the 1995 version better because of the anination and style
How do you know which one is more accurate? Were you there?
@@Mozee854 they probably weren’t but the survivors gave of their sides of the story supporting the younger theories. And science is a lot more advanced giving them more possibilities to be scientifically more accurate.
Will go on in rap
What song did you use
It took me ages to find this
I finally found it
Could you not remember what the video was?
The 1995 version was partially shown in the 97 movie making me think even back then that a fully finished version would be shown in the end of the movie maybe showing a rust time-laps but ever since then I believed the whole idea got scrapped in favor of focusing on a fictional love story that whent South. Now A Night To Remember had an excuse not to even think of showing that because the because by 58 the wreck still had yet to be found. By 95-97 Cameron had no excuse since he was able to include the actual wreck had been long found and he was able to include it into his movie.
Despues de 100 años debajo del mar el titanic esta maestado
beacuase this ship was found that it was steight final plunge in 1997
1995 is right.
Titanic wreck found in 1985.
Titanic TV series 1996 was likely the first Titanic movie that shows titanic split, before Titanic 1997.
jackieline apostol are you really that stupid? Titanic began its final plunge a hundred and six years ago
jackieline apostol plus your grammar is horrible.
No 1997 movie is wrong, the stern sank with a heavy port list so did the bow but ships oscillate underwater and move into different positions
Cool vid!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I LIKE USE OF EXCLMATION POINTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :)
not me.................
If it makes you fell better I won't pout an exclamation points in this reply.............. :)
ginantsfan5 can't you just use 2 exclamation points -_-
@@keeeyan they're like 6 probably
i love that music like a DJ
I also like the 1995 one
Muy buena teoria 2013 xD felicitaciones ;)
the 2013 footage is better, but this also just proves how really over the top people go with effects. there was no need for the flash backs, cut scenes and slow motion. music is shit too
Thank You Martin.
Carlos Echeverry SAVAGE
Martin Day the flash backs were actually from the documentary the animation was shown in.
OMG!!!
Same
This was used in the movie Titanic....forensic analysis
the first is corect BUT some parts of the athers are cirect
2:31 impossible shoe leather double bottom
where can i find the 2013 animation
el titanic!
whats the song that playyed in the 1995 animation
My heart will go on remix
Animation 1997 2012
2013 is creepy as the ship splits and spits the bodies of passengers outside
Why did i tried to imagine this... oh god.
Never saw any bodies
Titanic get broke 2 pieces cause there is a terrible explosion hes had 2 explosion on 1912 sink Titanic
1995 is more right and could be correct
the fuck is up with that bullshit editing on the 2013 part? I'm not experienced in video editing, but it doesn't take a chef to know when your food isn't cooked right.
the 2012 and 2013 simulations are most accurate
You weren’t on it!
Yeah!
Did you prank me?
Tell me!
Woah! Are you in heaven?
Como se llama el audio
what is the name of the song?
My heart will go on remix
It went under water in 1912
Stephanie Holland we all know. These are just theories.
Titanic :D
I like 1995
nice
You mean 2012 they made a new cgi of it
What Is name of this song pls
i need to know
Darude Sandstorm
this year is supposed to be titanic 1997-2013
jackieline apostol shut the hell up
You Shut The Hell Up
Fight! fight! fight! fight! fight!
@@mattsvids181 guess they never fought like you wanted them to. How does this make you feel?
@@ReubenWalton kinda ok this is one of my comments for my cringe compilation
Where is 2012 theory
1997 and 2012 no 1995 and 2013
Great animation. Atrocious music.
No 2012 therio
Where did you get that thumbnail
Oh wait 2014 nvm
I like both theories
WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Uhh..
Ruined with the awful music
so sad.
What is name of the song?
My heat Will Go on
@@mhalinho1282 wrong
What is name of this song?
My heart will go on.
@@conorokeefe5403 das not it