Sigma's f/1.8 Full Frame Zoom!!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 июн 2024
- 💭 Comment - Let us know what you think of the Sigma 28-45mm f/1.8 Art down below!
📦 Order here - buff.ly/4cl1PAG
🔔 Subscribe - buff.ly/2ymYMJQ
---------------------------------------------------
Product Links:
Home Page - buff.ly/3B849es
Sigma 28-45mm f/1.8 E Mount - buff.ly/4cl1PAG
Sigma 28-45mm f/1.8 L Mount - buff.ly/4cmEyOF
Helpful Links:
CVP Lens Coverage & Camera Comparison Tool - cvp.com/tools/cameralens
Vimeo Extended Cuts - vimeo.com/cvpgroup
---------------------------------------------------
Piece To Camera Kit:
Canon R5 C (PTC) - buff.ly/3ljDNAO
Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 II - buff.ly/40dVjoG
Canon RF to EF Adapter - buff.ly/3mQPbnX
Canon PD-E1 - buff.ly/3Lswtxa
Sennheiser MKE 600 - buff.ly/3AufQv5
CueScript EMC15 Teleprompter - buff.ly/3JpwejS
Sachtler Ace XL Tripod System - buff.ly/3Lx46xY
Aputure 200D - buff.ly/3JLRVMk
Aputure Light Dome II - buff.ly/3JHfKVN
Amaran P60c - buff.ly/408iDnW
Aputure B7c - buff.ly/3JJiEJt
Studio / B-Roll Kit:
RED KOMODO - buff.ly/3LuhrHw
Sachtler Video 18 S2 - buff.ly/3LtSR9B
Zeiss Otus EF Set - 28, 55, 85 - buff.ly/40b8tCX
Zeiss Milvus 100mm - buff.ly/3mZy6br
Aputure 600D Pro - buff.ly/3ZVwIWe
Litepanels Gemini 1x1 Soft - buff.ly/4081knz
Aputure LS 60x - buff.ly/3mTCUiK
Quasar Science Rainbow 2 Linear - buff.ly/3ZPX7Vp
Quasar Science Double Rainbow Linear - buff.ly/3LtGbQe
---------------------------------------------------
Follow us on:
/ cvptv
/ cvpgroup
/ cvpgroup
/ jakerratcliffe
/ joefcannon
---------------------------------------------------
Chapters:
Intro - 00:00
# # 
Кино
Hey all, I know we are a little bit behind the curve on this, but we thought this lens was worth talking about and we had this in our production pipeline before we got sidetracked by the C400! Quick kit will be live Sunday, and again thank you for watching! Jake
The only thing sharper than that lens is Jakes haircut
I kinda wondered the same thing lol
Can't believe how sharp it looks.
...the lens is cool too.
Reviews a full frame but his hair is cropped
I’m at dinner right now with my assistant (wife). I shall play this on the big screen when we get home and make sure we are both paying attention. Brb.
Haha
nice haircut jake
I'm surprised nobody talks about or even mentions Sigma 24-35 f/2, which is actually Full-Frame EF mount and has much better value than 28-45. I picked one up used for $400 last year.
그건 니 생각이고😂
The 24-35 is even more useless
@@JJARCHIE But for 1/2 to 1/3 of the price, it's pretty useful as two f/2 primes.
For me the main thing I like about the new 28-45 is the internal zoom, if the 24-35 had the same, I'd agree with you.
@@JohnDoe-me6vm ffs plz google. 24-35 f/2 is internal zoom. 24-35 T2.2 is the cine version.
Ehhh...at least the 18-35 was ROUGHLY a 2X zoom. This doesn't even zoom that much. At that point, you might as well just buy two primes. If it were 28-56, then it could get interesting.
But, really, Canon has thrown down the gauntlet with the 28-70mm f2 and the 24-105mm f2.8. Yes, they are expensive, but they are extremely versatile.
I can't believe sigma hasn't released something akin the the 18-35 for mirrorless aps-c. They've had 11 years!
I'm even more amazed that Fuji hasn't released something similar; they have a million reason to make one, unlike Sony/Canon/etc who concentrate on full-frame.
It would wreck their dc dn sales
despite the age, the 18/35 is still an awesome lens, there is little to no change to it, it's an awesome lens at a great price.
@@bbrunorochaThey could make it smaller, lighter, since they don't need a retro-focus design due to the shorter flange distance.
Faster focusing (linear motor) and making it for mounts that didn't exist back then (like sony e-mount); using it with an ef-e mount adapter isn't exactly the best autofocus experience. I'd say that's some pretty worthwhile changes.
Not needing another inch of adapter on the front of the camera alone would be great, and hardly small things, in the modern competitive lens market.
@@SCrowley91 oh i see, i use it on ef cameras and don't use auto focus, so we have different uses.
i love the haircut jake!
Deng Jake must pull a bunch of baddies
CVP continously blesing us
Picked it up and I love the lens. I also love the haircut.
outstanding trim young man
This probably will be less popular, because fullframe cameras struggle less in lowlight. I'd probably choose a 24-70 2.8 over this.
Sigma is more than we thinking about it. Bravo!
No GH7 review? This lens is very interesting at the price point but would've been a no brainer if it went to 24mm on the wide end.
Patiently waiting on the Ursa Cine 12k review
With the E mount both on the still/hybrid cameras (from the NEX to the current Alpha lineup) and professional cameras, to their cinema line...
With your lens testing I would be interested in seeing how their 14mm f/1.4 performs. There is also the new 50mm f/1.2 Art. The lenses are getting brighter!
I want it and the new 24-70MK2 😭 thanks for the great video as always.
Thanks for the detailed video. It would not be wrong to call it a new FF 18-35 f1.8. The smooth aperture movements are impressive. I think there is no need to worry about the Art series, which has proven its optical success.
Man that size is a killer. Looks good but damn!
If I'm buying a zoom lens, I'm buying versatility and flexibility. And the compromise I make are the aperture and bokeh. But if I buy a zoom and compromise on versatility and flexibility, what's the point? Not sure why you would want this over the 24-70mm. The impact of having 1.8 over 2.8 on fullframe, in the usual context of using a zoom lens, wouldn't add anything over the ability to reframe more extensively.
Amazing colors
I still use the original F1.8 EF. When I changed to Sony, I bought an adapter for E-mount. I am thinking about the new one.... let's see☺
They should do a 35-70mm 1.8. Thats more like it.
Theres the 2870 f2
35-85 f/2
I like your cut G
I love you guys. That is all
Now we need a C70 + 0.71x adapter + 28-45mm VS standard adapter + 18-35mm!
I really REALLY wish they made an EF version of this lens. Many of us prefer the versatility of using an RF body (C70/Komodo) and having the option of using a speedbooster with FF lenses.
Sigma EF 24-35 f/2 is the closest you'll get.
the sigma 18-35mm had three basical lenses in one, 14mm, 24mm and 35mm. With this 28-45mm, i am seeing just one; 35mm. Had it been it was 28-55mm, fine and good!!!
what DVP stand's for ?
No EF is big sadge. From the photos it appears that the rear element is pretty recessed, so I do not think it would be impossible …
Ef is a dead mount
The tamron f2-2.8 is eating this lens up
If it was 24-50 it would have been the perfect full frame lens for videos
Then you would only need a wide angle and tele prime lens to couple it for shoots
can you use it with the recent Blackmagic Cinema Camera 6K without needing an adaptor?
Yes
How loud is it in AF with a close subject? The old art lenses were so loud that a shotgun mic could still pick it up.
It’s quiet when I tested it
The 18-35 is 11 years old now, hard to believe. I think for Canon, the 28-70 would maybe outshine it a bit but at a cost.
Hi CVP! Love your videos. Just a bit of constructive feedback: I had seen a bunch of videos about the 28-45mm f1.8 -- how it's their successor to the 18-35, etc -- but because of the thumbnail on your review -- I actually misunderstood and clicked expecting to see a new lens, an actual full frame 18-35, not just the 18-35 equivalent. Nothing major, and honestly, it's probably more my dumb ignorance than anything, and the review was still spot on, but perhaps that data could be useful next time when you title something.
People have been ignoring Sigma 24-35 f/2
I wish it came in an EF mount.
Same. Maybe we’ll get lucky with an EF cine version
looks like you could bludgeon someone to death with that thing. gonna be a bit front heavy if you try putting it on a little mirrorless body
and now 50-85 f/1.8 and we have a set!
I do think they will also release an 65-100mm 1.8 like the 50-100mm 1.8.
Also why not dream about a 16-25 1.8 :)
Full frame 18-35mm interesting. 28-45mm not so much. How are these lenses actually related? And why does the thumbnail list the first lens when the video is about the 2nd? (Yeah, I got the APS-C connection but that’s not in the thumbnail. “Full Frame” is.) I don’t get it.
Sigma 24-35 f/2 completed ignored by these reviewers.
I know the E mount is more popular but Sigma needs to also take in consideration Nikon Z mount.
Probably a licensing issue with Nikon. Same with canon holding back the RF.
@cvptv, who is this guy? Where is Jake? 🤷🏻♂️
I don’t see this as a success to the crop 18-35…. Considering the full frame equivalent would be 27-52mm f/2.7… which 28-70mm lenses already exist…. This to me is simply an additional masterpiece that stands on its own as it has a short range yet faster. I would by this as a companion specialty lens, not replacing my trusty 18-35…
On yountests can you measure the furthest practical distance to talent for critical focus…. In most cases The 1835q performs best at short distance of 15m or less without hunting.
Thanks for all the great content…. There’s another one for the shopping basket…
get shocked by how the technology are crazy now day
Focus by wire on e-mount is a bitter pill to swallow!
Ok who kpopped Jake’s hair?
Jake I can see a Ghana 🇬🇭 flag where the boxer is 0:40
Too wide in my opinion.
28-105 f2 would be a fine one
1.8 zoom is nice but the range is not here nor there. I would take 24-50 2.8 over this one.
Hopefully this lens will be available in Z Mount also
Listen man, I don't know who controls the amount on this but there has been two sets of two 15 second ads within the space of 2 mins. Please look into sorting this out. Your business doesn't need the revenue from RUclips
meh not for me. :)
misleading thumbnail