1970 Plymouth Fury vs Chevrolet Impala Dealer Promo Film Caprice Bel Air Biscayne
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 дек 2019
- 1970 Plymouth Fury vs Chevrolet Impala Dealer Promo Film
Mopar is a registered trademark of Chrysler Group LLC. Master Tech series training materials are the property of Chrysler Group LLC and are used with permission.
MyMopar.com 
Авто/Мото
I really enjoy watching these old videos
I do too.
Takes me to a better time and place time travel is real music does the same thing
I like US things, cars too. I've been just once, in Houston 2007. Our cars was and they still are like toys compared with yours. Back then, 100 hp car we considered for a race car. Since I'm living in Macedonia (small leftover of Yugoslavia) in that time we used to have some Russian cars too. About rust: new, brand new Russian car back then was coming with rust (like additional equipment :) ). Body rust holes repairs was regular service...
Great regards from Macedonia, love US
As much as love Mopar, the 1970 impala was a great car, I had 3 of them
Had what happened to them
loved my 70 fury 440 sure grip awesome car.
in 1970 the company I worked for had a 1970 townsman no power brakes needed extra distance to stop and had that same old worn out peddle since 1961 couldn't keep it in alignment but that was typical of all chevrolets back than and that powerglide transmission ment getting on a highway a real pain
We had a 70 fury sport. 383 6 barrel. Loved that hauler!
People forget that the Chrysler cars were already leading the way in engineering, power compression ratios and innovation before the fuselage bodies premiered in '69, which not only were far better looking than anything GM was offering, but were functionally superior as well. Chevy and all of GM was just coasting along on ancient platforms, making styling changes but doing nothing truly revolutionary. When Chrysler made changes, they were FUNCTIONAL and meant something important to the safety, driver convenience or technical aspects that made for a better driving and riding experience. Chevy just wanted to get cars out as cheaply as possible, and offered a bare bones car in comparison to what Chrysler-plymouth-Dodge was putting out at the same price-points. Plus, these cars were made with some of the best parts, engineered to last much longer than anything from Ford or GM. Chevy had you coming in for service CONSTANTLY, just for preventive maintenance while Chrysler's preventive maintenance meant doing NOTHING for long period of time, because the cars were engineered for long life without constant need of service, saving customers HUGE amounts of money over the life of the car.
Family drove Mopar almost exclusively. Great cars, solid engines, horrible alternators and starters. Always kept a spare ballast resistor in the glove box. The 60s Mopars were better made than the 70s models. Dont even bring up the 80s!
I think you are waxing a bit nostalgic. The late 60’s early 70’s Mopars were attractive and they had solid drivetrains but, so did everyone else. Mopar fell way short in build quality and that is universally known.
GM and Ford vehicles also were generally more expensive than Mopar but outsold them by wide margins and that is no mistake. ( they made attractive well built vehicles ) GM, a HUGE corporation, generally was conservative, always looking at the big picture. Smaller manufacturers had the luxury of producing peripheral offerings ( Hemi , flamboyant styling, turbine, winged cars etc ) and those were cool. 68-70 Chargers and Fury are some of best looking cars ever. GM and Ford had Hemi’s, turbines and rotaries wild styling in their engineering departments also but decided correctly, not to produce them as they were money losers. GM pulled out of racing in the late 50’s but still ruled the auto industry. GM wasn’t perfect ( I think the beans counters ruled too much ) Ford and GM had their fingers on the pulse of market and it paid off.
The Fury was such a good looking car. I love the power bulge hood and hideaway lights
1967davethewave they all did not have hide away headlights. Go back and look at the wagons then check out the fury I’d. I was 20 years old and an avid car but. Didn’t say how the fuel mileage suffered because EVERYTHING bigger makes it hard to park, lousy mileage and the fact that my 70 dodge Super Bee lived its first three years in El Paso TX and had already started rusting. They have all made some great cars and some turds. Ad’s like these are always biased. Oh, the Impala could be had with an LS6 454 making well over 450 hp.
@@kenswitzer4133 I didn't say all Fury's had hideaway lights. I said I like them just like I like hideaway lights on a 68/69 GTO. But not all of them had hideaways. As far as rust, my dad bought a 73 Chevy truck in 1973. When he traded it off in 1978 it was rusted completely apart. I bought a 73 Chevy truck in 2004 from the original owner. It had the original paint and only had one small spot of rust behind each wheel opening in the bed only, about the size of a .50 cent piece. So why do some vehicles rust and identical vehicles don't? I don't know but I have a 70 Challenger setting in my shop right now that has never been restored and has a perfect floor and trunk pans, no rust anywhere except the torsion cross member. Finally, the most powerful engine available in the 1970 Impala was the 390 horsepower 454 .The LS6 was only available in the Chevelle that year. That's a lot of power and more than available in a Fury but not 450 horsepower.
1967davethewave I did a search and the LS6 was offered but very few were ever sold. A friend of mine bought a 1967 Impala with the 427 and for the times it was pretty fast. Wasn’t trying to start an argument. I have had all of them and as I said they have ALL made some great ones. Especially the fifties and sixties. Even though the Super Bee had some rust I cleaned it and prepped it and a friend did the touch up. Kept it nine years and never another spot of rust. I hated to get rid of it but it wasn’t practical for a family with two kids. My Wife even tested up when it left. Don’t get me wrong, I am a big fan of the MOPAR muscle. They are still awesome. This guy said Plymouth had more powerful engines. They did have a few but the 283 was the first to make one ho per cubic inch. If you haven’t figured it out yet, I have been a Chevy, not so much GM fan since the sixties and can tell you I know from experience some of the shortfalls of the Chevies. Have A Great Day.👍🇺🇸🤙😃
@@kenswitzer4133 Yeah, my dad had a 69 Kingswood wagon with a 427, it was a sleeper for sure.
1967davethewave I understand. I still have a 67 Camaro Base Coupe and am in the process of building it into a fun little resto mod. I had a 67 mustang convertible I really liked. Was going to but a new 70 Cuda with 383 magnum but it sold a few hours before I got their. They had the Super Bee at a good price so I bought it. I love the older cars and respect the hell out of the new ones.👍
2:00. People were skinnier and drinks were smaller.
My first car in high school was a 70 Fury III i got in 1980. One owner car was in excellent shape. Put a paint job on it and some aftermarket tires/wheels. Was quite a boat but I loved her.
The sad thing is, more people seem to want these now, than when new.
@silverbird58 wow that’s an amazing find, usually it’s the body that is rusted out on the Mopars from this vintage !
Seeing the cars and the Big Boy statue brings back memories of big fast cars and great burgers and fries.
Took my driving test in July 1970 in my moms 70 Plymouth Fury 111. Even aced the parallel parking test. The car had a 318. I think the Fury was a better lookin car than Impala. But I’m a Mopar guy.
Use "I" for Fury III. It's Roman Numerals.
Like how Charlie give chev the middle finger over servicing.
I saw that as well, LOL
Luke duke Once she saw Charlie’s huge middle finger it was all over
I was working part time at the Chrysler-Plymouth garage in Charleston, IL while in was in college. We sold a new ‘70 Sport Fury to one of the professors at EIU. It was a pretty car but it came off the transport with about a dozen quality issues that had to be fixed and the customer had several more issues with it that we had to repair in the shop. He was a long-time Plymouth guy but he was not impressed.
Yeah, and it only got worse for Chrysler. Well for Detroit, period.
The Fury looked great. Better than the Impala at the end of the 60s. Mopar was winning everything in the early 70s, right up until the first gas crisis. Oh and we old men love those legs. The comments here are funny. Car men. Leg men.
Family members back in the day had both models. The 1970 Chev rode very well, was quite sturdy and trouble free. The A/C froze you and the heater roasted you. For the day, the body held up well, and, true to Delco electrics, the car would start and run well in the worst of conditions. It had a big block of some sort, I think a 402. It moved the car very well. Two uncles had a 1969 New Yorker 4-door hardtop and a 1971 Fury 3 2-door hardtop. This one had early BF Goodrich radial tires on it as this uncle did a lot of milea. I will say the 2 Mopar vehicles were very capable road machines, handled well, but were not as quiet or tight feeling on the road, but one felt very safe in them at high speed. They went where they were pointed. Both had 383 engines. The only problem was damp weather starting fits, ballast resistor spares were kept in the glovebox. Not much could take on Delco electrics back then. Plymouth, Chevy, and Canadian Pontiacs (Chevy chassis in disguise) were used a lot, being the majority choice for taxi use by the industry in Montreal at the time when I lived there.
I look at a lot of old cars for sale, from.survivors to beaters that should have been junked years ago. So many mopars have GM alternator conversions.
Ha! Changed slot of ballast resistors, starters and alternators back then... but unlike today, it was easy work and parts were cheap. I could climb in and sit in the engine compartment while I worked on it. Not on today's cars!
All things considered, G.M. sold two million chevys a year for most of the 60s. Mopars were swell but rode like buckboards and were considered ugly.
Those Impalas were some of the worst riding cars ever produced. And always over heated especially when equipped with a small block.
@@justina3221 Whoever told you that was full of shit.
Thank You for posting this for all of us to enjoy!...It is Appreciated.
I had a 73 Fury 360/4bbl duals in the 90's. I used to love to see the looks on all the Mustang guys faces as I blew by them. :)
I really enjoyed this. Nostalgia, great cars, and it was really funny!
those are great time went cars was
cars and everything else was great
music movie and cars those years never come
back
I would think that the window was the most convenient ashtray, for the 1970 driver that smoked. The floor, for the less discriminating smoker.
Unfortunately the window was the most convenient for trash in general, as it still is today, because people in general, don't give a shit.
Never was a smoker but I would think those small vent windows on the 4 door Fury would have been great for getting rid of ashes and butts.
@@northdakotaham1752 they were. I can look at my mothers 64 Barracuda and look at the A pillar beside the drivers vent window and see the paint burnt off the pillar from the long ashes before they got sucked out the window. The windshield still sweats nicotine, and she's been gone since '89. We still love her car that she bought new.
@@northdakotaham1752 Oh and another thing about the vent windows, I had a 70 Fury 1 police pursuit, and that vent window frame was great to hold onto when turning left real hard, especially with the hard police seat springs and slick vinyl upholstery.
@@davidkeeton6716 I still have several vehicles with those vent windows. Driving newer cars that don't have them, I wish they still put them on cars, trucks.
I'll take a Fury wagon please.
Who can forget the Big Boy restaurants?
The Plymouths had a higher degree of luxury than the Caprice. In 1970 the Caprice was not offered with a divided bench seat with passenger recliners. The Brougham package in the Sport Fury offered this. Also The Ford LTD Broughams offered split bench seats with reclinners.
GM always hated reclining seats; they were probably worried that a few dopes would pull the lever while doing 80 and their survivors would get million dollar settlements.
8:55 "What does it mean, Charlie?" The girl asks. With a middle finger, the seller answers: "It means that if you buy a Chevrolet, you'll take it up the (insert favorite cavity)"...
My brother had a 1970 Plymouth Fury station wagon it was huge .
The young woman sounds like a 55 year old heavy smoker
fordtruxdad - yeah, old Battle-ax definitely not as pictured.
Almost had forgotten how short those skirts were back then! I said...almost!
@jason9022 no thanks..I will stick to fixing engines, much less expensive.
😆 She sounds like she must have coughed up some phlegm the second she stopped taping, doesn't she?
Or she started a 3 pack a day habit when she was 10.🤣
I would have loved a 1970 Fury in Burnt Orange with a cream interior. Mopar blue is also a handsome color.
But what does it mean Charlie? We get it.
Sell the features and EXPLAIN the benefits to a prospect. But dear God, that whiny "But what does it mean Charlie" grates on my ears.
For looks, I’ll take the Fury’s front with the Chevrolet rear end.
Lmao you silly 😂
Chevy's lights look like Mustangs.... no thanks. The Plymouth looks better all around.
I gave full credit to the Airtemp A/C. It had good power with a 383 4bbl under the hood. I did like opening the glove box to rest my drink on the inverted cover.
This makes me like my fury gran coupe even more
Windows rolling down with one turn of the handle less than the Chevrolet?
SOLD!
1970 Plymouth Fury 3, learned to Drive with this car in high School, Driver's Training, they were equipped with an extra "Brake" type pedal for the instructors to use, on the passenger side. Good size vehicle, as I recall
I love these videos so much! Thank you!
That Grand Fury III Sport is such an awesome looking full sized car! I’ve owned one and a good friend has owned one. Mine I bought for daily use in 1975, while stationed at Ft Carson, CO. In The U.S.Army. I bought off the original owner a municipality called Cripple Creek, an old mining town at the western foot of Pikes Peak. That had only 45,000 miles, but was only a 2dr Fury I, that was used by the Police Chief, that usually bought when the 6 year upgrade came around, but OPEC brought gas to $.70/gal overnight from $.50, so he had no need for a 2dr that got 8-16mpg! So I ended up with a fantastic road trip machine for three-four friend who shared gas expenses to road trip on weekends, in roomy comfort. The car did however have a honking 440,4 brl TNT engine with huge dual exhaust, plus a sweet 3:09 Posi rear, with HD Suspension and HD cop brakes, disks on front. I also cranked up the front torsion bars, plus added a rear leaf in the spring pack, that with the biggest KONI Shocks I’ve ever seen with the Police Suspension and rear sway bar made that big car handle great on mountain roads, paved and dirt, especially with the huge Firestone Town&Country Mud&Snow tires I put on the rear and matching reg tread on the front. We had so much fun traveling all around The Rocky Mountains together! Then after I was Honorably Discharged and returned home to R.I. and nearby Mass a good friend of mine bough a beautiful car just like the one pictured from the video. It was a 1970 Fury III Sport 2dr with a beautiful white and red interior with white bucket seats. Plus the same 440 TNT I had in my 69! That I talked him into setting up just like the one in pictures I showed him. He bought it so he could carry all his SCUBA diving equipment, plus 12’ inflatable Zodiac raft with 35 hp Chrysler outboard! That all fit in the huge trunk!
I clicked Like even before I watched it, I LOVE these videos that much!
I had a 1971 Fury Tree four door. Hell on gas but had acreage in size. And it was fast! 440 magnum.
My father had a 4 door sedan Plymouth Fury... Black Top Brown Paint Job 1971
They're great cars! I bet your father loved his! You can't replace the sound and feel of stepping on the gas pedal! It stirs the soul!
Big Cars..
My parents had a 71 Fury Gran Coupe. It was a very good looking car. But in four years, it started to rust. The 360 was not a very good motor. We had the car for two days, the engine started knocking. Chrysler had to replace the engine. We had that car from brand new in 71 to about 79. The engine went bad again. It only had about 68,000 miles on it. We junked it. That was a sad day. But the next week, I bought a 69 roadrunner, so all ended well for me.
You must have just gotten a bad engine. We had a 360 in a 74 Monaco and it was just a screamer. Easily burn off a rear tire and the car was rock solid way over 110 mph. Engine ran as smooth as those with fuel injection today.
Yes, it had a 360. The 360 was standard in the '71 Fury Grand Coupe.
"The rust holes on the Fenders of the Fury will appear on the tops of the fenders, not down low on the heels of the fender like on the Chevrolet. No comparison"
Ahh, spoken like someone else that lived through salted roads. That killed a lot of cars and trucks. Remember how the side of the bed would rust off of a '67-'80 Ford truck?
The Sport Fury S/23 with the Super Commando 383 4bbl was rated at 330hp, 0-60 in 7.5 seconds and a top speed of 130mph. The gross weight was 4048 pounds.
The full-size version of the Road Runner
Top speed of 130, they must have taken a break. The 1970 2 Challenger with the 318 2 Barrel top speed was 142. The 383 would easily run into the 140s and probably a bit faster. It is the only engine I knew of that you could rev to a point so high that it would float valves and shut itself off before it broke.
Seems like I used to see alot of these Fury cars used by law enforcement. Cop motor, cop brakes, cop tires etc... could be wrong. It was a long time ago.
@@northdakotaham1752 I bought a 1974 Fury, titled as a municipal vehicle, when I returned from the service in 1977. It was the fastest vehicle I personally ever owned. I had driven it on more than a couple of occasions and averaged 165 + miles per hour over a 10 Mile Stretch and clocked it at one time on a mile stretch at over 187 miles per hour. Wasn't real fast off the line, but if you were rolling down the highway at 60 miles an hour you could be doing a hundred and 20 inside of 4 seconds. And the 140-mile speedometer apparently only went 240 miles an hour or so that you weren't still looking at the dashboard when you were going much much faster.
@@44hawk28 Dad had a 74 Monaco, 360 V8 ... wasnt that the same car? It was really solid way over 100 mph. Had Michelin steel belted 15 inch radials. Our first car with radial tires.
I miss the days when young ladies wore dresses.
And no tattoos.and wore hose like a real woman
In Canada, the Bel Air was offer as a 2 door hardtop coupe.
70 Fury is a great looking, almost unknown car these days
But what does it meeeaan Charlie? 😂
It means... We give you the middle finger at servicing your new car
You need less vehicle serving and get more rear seat servicing at the drive inn !
Just what every cute chick craves- a smart guy who can point out every minute inferiority in her car.
The Plymouth Fury III was more of a direct competitor to the Impala and Galaxie 500. The Sport Fury for 1970 was more competitive to the Chevy Caprice and Ford LTD.
Especially the Brougham models
Make mine in burnt orange with a cream cloth interior. Loved that Airtemp A/C.
Chevy sure did kick Thier ass in 1971-76! Fury's are very rare now. The Chevys are still on the road. My 1971 convertible woke up in a day after sitting damn near 20 years. New points clean gas and I drove it around no problems. At least the Plymouth interiors are intact at the junk yard!
Thanks that was good and i had one of those furys years ago and they are good
I'll take just about everything that he mentioned but I really like the full-size Dodge Plymouth the Plymouth wagons in the Impalas. All my daily drivers are still from the mid-70s.
My parents had a 70 Plymouth Fury III four door one. Great car at the time.
*I know it's easy to demonstrate with any comparison test like this that your car the better designed and engineered automobile of the two, but, I have to admit that the Chrysler products of the 70's were not only better looking, but also larger and more powerful than Chevrolet as well. BTW., Who in the world would want a six-banger in a huge beast like that? You could barely get the thing up a hill! lol. I had a early-1970's (forget the year just now, 72-73 maybe) metallic green Chrysler Town & Country wagon, with every bell and whistle they offered, what a car! It was indestructible! It had a 440-ci that roared and pushed you back in your seat when you kicked it in the butt! And that thing was as heavy as they made them too. I'd love to have an older American car today. Compared to the plastic motorized computer chips I drive now, it would be nice to have a big, basic, simple, classy and POWERFUL good ole American car again. Said the old Baby Boomer lol.*
@Charles Larkin *Really? Bad decision. Well, I guess that makes sense to me now, now that we know more about how our Govt. has been working;The politicians 'SAY' that they paid for the 440-ci or 383-ci Interceptor engines, get the cheaper slant-six engine instead, shuffle the books a bit and then pocket the profit. It's the poor Police Officers that pay the price, no wonder so many of them were on the take back then, it wouldn't even have been worth chasing the bad guys back then, not in a weak six-cyl, just take the bribe and let 'em go, they are going to outrun us anyway lol.*
That slant six was a great engine! Still have one in a 67 Sweptline half ton. Wouldn't want one in a heavy car however. The 318 was a better choice and could get well over 20 mpg at 55 mph.
Today's cars are nothing but crusher fodder. Disposable cars, electronics are obsolete by the time it gets on the road.
@@northdakotaham1752 *So true, the 'Super Six' were awesome engines! And, the 'Super Six' engines came in an astonishingly detailed variety as well. Even high performance 'Super Six' engines were offered. The 318-ci was yet another engineering triumph for Chrysler. Extremely well engineered automobiles from a great American automobile company... It breaks my American heart that Fiat now owns them.*
@@MrMenefrego1 really sad what's happened with the modern cars. Rolling electrical nightmare! Takes almost nothing to entirely disable one so it wont even run.
old cars will allways be loved.because their actual cars.NOT ipads on 4 wheels.same with old trucks.
Unibody construction has been around for a long time. A time when passenger cars still used leaf spring rear suspensions.
Yes true even the Hudson hornet had a unibody
That extra 3" width sure came in handy with a tall one in the back seat !
I loved my fury 3, except for the rust. Lol.
1970. The best looking Fury in my opinion. Those wrap around grills Plymouth brought in Really Make It!
Its funny that they are comparing a fury III with an Impala. The car in the photo is a Caprice.
The battle of the 2 landyatchs from 2 budget brands Chevrolet Impala vs Plymouth Fury.
Here is the deal -- the Plymouth Fury base was about $300.00 more then the Chevy Impala.
300 was a lot of money for the average joe in 1970.
They both have their pros and cons, but the Chevy has a face, while the Plymouth just looks like a big rectangular thing on wheels.
Thanx Charlie, but I still I want that Chevy.
Chrysler corp. was always ahead in styling in those days
Can someone confirm if the 1969-1971 fuselage c-bodies had the widest brake pedal ever? Can't say I've ever seen a wider one. I remember staring at that pedal on granddad's Newport.
I miss my fury 1970 convertible I bought for $ 300 , color green. Old good days.
Interesting how the points the Dodge salesman makes are mostly trivial things
No wonder Mopar had the police/taxi side of things pretty well wrapped up. Both Mopar & Ford had a good 1970 as GM had that lengthy strike that year. An area where Chevrolet benefitted was there was no clock on the Sport Fury. It was fitted as standard on the Caprice. Also the rear-view mirror was bigger on the Chevy. They said it was a downside but did eliminate more blind-spots when looking into it.
My dad had a 69 Fury 3. Clock was standard . Can't speak about the sport fury. They also had the fury VIP.
That BEEP every few seconds...... wow... lol
I will always Love The Plymouth !
Never liked commercials that advertise the other company . Both cars look good though. Compared to the lookalike boxes of today.
Not many people restore C body Mopars! 😞 Big old American cars are just not loved. Perhaps it is because they require so much space to garage. I have a 65 Fury III coupe and a 72 Chrysler Newport 4 door HT and boy is it hard to find parts to finish the rebuilds.
Bet I could buy the Plymouth name for cheap today.
21 cubic feet of trunk space! You could fit a smart car 🚗 in there...
Does 70s Mopar models were 👌🏽
Plymouth makes it.
Me gustan
I love how the Chevy is always parked in the middle of the two spaces ..... LOL small tricks.
I actually like the Chevy better in this case
Ding!
Funny the things they point out back then - Look! We've got wider side moldings! That should sell you right there.
Did they still make Plym. VIP in '70 ?
Yet the Chevrolet's of that era are still common to see restored on the roads. Not seen a 1970 Fury in a bloody long time.
Take a look on "my car story" a few well restored Fury videos.
@@markg7030 Thanks, will do.
Charlie is smarter than many folks and on taste? He has some!..compared to some of the comment posters below.
Go watch a Chevy video..trolling is a waste of everyone's time.
The Fury was years ahead of Brand X..on engineering, ergonomics and overall driveability and handling and as Charlie states..way lower maintenance!
Who wants to change the trans fluid & filter every 12k?
Sure, looks are mostly of personal choice, but much of why the Fury looks how it does, is form following function.
I grew up when cars of this era were new, being born in '66, in Wisconsin..all I can say is, sans revisionist history or malarkey, the MoPars held up much better in terms of things like bumpers not falling off after a few years of salty winters and much more durable drivetrains and suspension systems, not even a comparison to anything else you could name.
And yet amazingly there are thousands more 70 chevys still out there than there are fury's.. 🤔🤔🤔
@@sterlingarcher8441 they sold thousands more. simple math. more cheaply made things are sold and bought...idk why. look how big walmart got, selling low quality, when Costco is right down the street with much more good stuff..that's just one example.
My 68 Sport Fury isn’t rusted out and is my daily driver. I haven’t seen a Chevy yet I would own. Chrysler had the best engineers, Chevy trolls just don’t know any better.
@@josephjames259 Right on. Engineers..as in the guys at Chrysler that shortened WW2 and helped NASA reach the moon.
No foolin'.
A '68 Sport Fury! Nice machine! C body Mopars, dang..true 'Do it all' cars & with style, grace and competence to boot..and amazing booty's, lol. I've a few things to accomplish on my '70 Fury and she'll be cruising after the snowy season, in a few months: Drivers side window mechanism, brake booster and an exaust system and a few lil things..ie the vinyl top is a mess :p & she'll be golden.
Tom Johnson 69-73 are great years for Fury. They have a wicked looking grill. Enjoy that project! I’m on forcbodiesonly forum. Are you over there?
My car was not well cared for but it is coming along. It is my daily with a fresh 383. I googled the VIN and found it was a drug seizure in 2011.
The 1969 Fury was the most gorgeous one ever built (in my opinion), it just seems like they had to mess with it. The 1970 isn’t bad, but I don’t like it nearly as much.
Love the car stuff but have you any of the chrysler marine division ads or content not may people may know bout it
my bros 70 caprice 2door coupe had da 400 very nice car lots of torque was a asskicker to, overall quality dependability go to da bowtie,,
Plymouth Fury looked so much better!
That would make me Furyious.
I had a 71 Fury with a 360 in it ,, it was pretty fast
@Jim Kohler yea , the 318 was shot ,, the 360 was from a wrecked taxi,, then drove it from Vancouver to Toronto pulling a trailer , I put a rumble seat in it too p
it was a wagon,, two way tailgate
I bet Dean Winchester would hate this video.
I am a big Chevy fan but it must be said that stock Mopars smoke stock Chevys. Those hemis are more expensive. So, you get what you pay for.
6:32 - is that the rear or the front of the Fury?
Did they actually film this at a Big Boy Restaurant?
Yes
Fury was a beautiful vehicle but Impala hit the sweet spot with buyers- they sold 1 million cars/year.
The Girl never returned with the 1970's Plymouth Fury, so Charly furiously had to drive out in the impala.
She saw Charlie’s huge middle finger and it was all over.
which one rotted out first???
Close race, to close to call....would be a photo finish, maybe even a tie.....but wait, Jimmy Carters free-trade steel is just around the corner ! Good for rust holes on a car only a year and a half old !
They both rust fast! I had a 70 impala
On the sad side, the young lady in the film now has varicose veins on those legs.😳😬😮
Rick B if any blood is still flowing at all!
I used to have a '65 Fury III when i was a kid.
But i took it out in a corn field and beat the fuck out of it.
LOL where is plymouth now!
With Saturn, Pontiac and Oldsmobile.
Chevrolet still going strong. Plymouth just a memory.
say all you will , both cars will turn heads today , thease are true full size cars .