@@Breaktheice123 Thank goodness for people like you and Peter who want the truth to come out. I appreciate everything you do I know it’s a lot of work. 💕🇨🇦
It takes a very brave man, and a very confident man to come out and tell the truth like this. This is David versus Goliath and Peter is just one man. He needs the support of the public to get behind him and put pressure on the college of policing and Lancashire police to reveal what information.they had. There sre so many unanswered questions and another investigation really needs to be opened up but this is only going to happen with public pressure. Nicola deserves this otherwise her legacy will be forever mired with the words shambolic, lies, corruption, ineptitude, mistrust and we the public deserve a police force that we can trust.
Have you seen the latest ? Peter Bleksley shoving in the narrative again good gawd ! saying that the so called expert searching the water in the Nicola Bulley case ,and online sleuths 🥵 ,he is talking about the girl who has gone missing in yorkshire, I asked if this was bbc ,Apparently its talk tv
My 21 y/o Daughter was followed along the River Wyre early this Summer by a man who threatened her. She thankfully came across an old gentleman who asked her if she was ok as he could see she was distressed. The man following her (white male, 30-40 years old) was on a push bike, dressed all in black wearing a black beanie (even though it was a warm day). We reported it to the police and strangely enough they said he was already known to them from his description and behavior. I would certainly like to know who this man in black is and why Lancashire Police know of him. I remember clearly what Peter Faulding said about the man in black.
Oh my darling, that is terrifying. Thank god she’s ok I remember early on in the case there was mention of a man at another yet nearby river location, and it was questioned whether he played a role. Personally, I think that the image of the man Peter Faulding noted was behaving strangely and asked a press photographer to capture ought to be released.
@Worldagenda24 I am too especially when people who have no knowledge of this stuff and they are trying to contradict him when he is an expert in his field 🙄 I don't understand why people think that he would have an agenda to come forward and challenge the powers that be publicly and possibly damage his reputation by doing so I can't stand when some creators won't even consider police corruption when we often see evidence of it and lots of it imo
The only reason that peter said she wasn't in the river is because the police divers said it was branches so why would he disbelieve the police not being truthful...but they wouldnt let him scan again or dive to see for himself...that is suspicious in itself.
I find it all very confusing, like why did Lancashire police hide the fact that Peter found Nikki when it proves she was below the bench in that river 70 meters down confirming LP hypotheses were correct all along? 🤔
I did hear Paul & Nicola argued the night before and it continued into the next morning. I didn't watch this documentary because I knew it would stick to the same narrative as given from the beginning.....and I've never believed she simply fell in the river.
After the inquest, Nicola's family said that they " now wanted to be left alone!" So why make a documentary. My feeling is that a "certain" family member is worried that the public are still talking about Nicola, and are still saying that the whole case was very suspicious. Certain people are panicking that the truth WILL eventually come out! And Peter was made a scapegoat in all of this. Have we ever before seen a documentary such as this, where "grieving" family appear as actors, in a documentary made simply and solely to push the narrative surrounding the circumstances surrounding the death. This to me shouts Desperation! Excellent video Luke. 👏👏💙
Yes the truth finally comes out whether 5 yrs, 10 yrs, 20 yrs etc. There is no hiding place for those who have done wrong anymore. Hope I'm around to see the truth..
Perhaps they made the documentary so that the whole family could stop the speculation and maybe they were advised too. I didn't realised someone in the police died on the investigation. Did anyone get what it was of? I always found one thing so different about this case and that was ni press conference woth the family Paul etc together. Or did I miss it? As normal procedure you fave cameras together in paticular the partner does and then they put out a direct message to the missing loved one. That I don't remember.
I feel so bad for Peter. He did so much for this family and the police only to be thrown under the bus. This is what you get for helping people. I can't believe they then defamed him again in the documentary. He should sue.
Watch Adventures with Purpose, it will show you exactly what this sonar can do. Anyone doing this work is doing a fantastic job. It's all so very sad. 😔
That’s my theory too. They wanted her to decompose to cover up the fact that she was injured or knocked unconscious before going into that river. The river there is so narrow at that point and at that time of the day there is no current whatsoever. There’s even little steps built into the bank right at the bench and rocks to stand on. If she fell in conscious, she would have easily been able to climb out. As for cold water shock - if she was an elderly lady I could believe that but she was a fit and active young woman with no heart problems.
Two screams could be the dog pushing her over and the second being her hitting the rocks? It's definitely steep and long drop, go and see it. The sky report says it's a drop after the bank rolls down to that point. Why is no one acknowledging the other deaths on the river that weren't treated as conspiracies?
@@queenofhearts6127No current? It's a river by definition it's moving inland water, aka a river. If it was a small river it would be called a stream, brook....
I don't believe the story about her drowning in this tiny river - she wasn't a baby so even if the water levels were higher than the TV footage shows she'd have been able to get herself out. The behaviour of the police and the media was really strange and the whole thing stinks of a cover up.
The whole investigation smells of something really, really ODD. Discrepancies & inconsistencies from start to finish which made it look and feel like NOT YOUR AVERAGE MISSING PERSON.
I'm not sure what to believe but I do remember locals being interviewed saying the river suddenly gets 18ft deep in many places even if the edges seem very shallow. Her husbands slightly bruised eye was very troubling but its standard for Police to look for scratches etc elsewhere too on partners to discount them , so I assume he had a verified explanation re his eye.
@@sarahholland2600 I think it was org crime. I think there was a visit by crims to their house on that eve in Jan when they were both beaten. I think that when she then went missing it was either the crims Delivering in their final warning Or covert ops removing her to witness protection. Either way it explains the resignation to her disappearance and the family’s acquiescence. Also the Derek Clayton, vet links etc .
@@carolineblackledge8912 Police & paramedics were called to their home 10 days prior. I feel that might explain a lot but we arent allowed to know the details. Plus stopping taking her HRT if she'd been v depressed re menopause etc was a v v bad idea. I wonder why she stopped taking them.
I keep coming back to the idea that Ansell got one of the Fletchers to bump her off. That family aren't the nicest lot. Quentin had been suspended from Garstang Community Academy (so was presumably present on Allotment Lane that morning). Oscar and Toby have got previous for sorting out debts with a baseball bat. Aaron's constantly in and out of prison for assaulting and stalking women. If (hypothetically) Ansell wanted her out of the picture, what better family to turn to for assistance, conveniently living a few metres away from her daily dog walk? Never forget that 2 different witnesses heard a woman screaming.
I've visited St Michael's on several occasions and I'm telling you that the slope from the bench to the river is not steep. Indeed, the last time I was there I saw a mother sitting on the bench looking at her mobile while her toddlers played on the slope. The theory that Nicola walked to the river's edge to attach the lead to Willow, stumbled and fell into the river is illogical given the position of the lead found on day one. The lead was found half-way between the bench and river's edge. If Nicola had attempted to attach the lead to the dog on the river's edge and the dog had jumped up and knocked her backwards, then she would have either fallen into the river with the lead still in her hand or the lead would have been in the river - it was found half-way up the slope. If Nicola had attempted to attach the lead to the dog from the position of it found on day one and stumbled there would have been sufficient time for Nicola to have regained her footing before the river's edge. Anyway, what sane person would walk to the river's edge to attach a lead to a dog? The theory suggested by the Bulley family is pie in the sky.
It is still a mystery. There was also something odd about the death of Willow's vet apparently as well. No idea if it is connected and now a young mother has disappeared in Yorkshire in similar circumstances to Nicola. Sometimes these cases get solved years later.
I 100% believe Peter Faulding. The so called officials including the coroner should explain their reasoning for not taking Peter’s evidence into account when it was clearly evident that there was a solar image of a body in the river
Evening Luke, I've spent 30 years as an academic in field studies in the aquatic environment (H index 26), 100% agree that Peter found Nicola in early Feb 23, its cyrstal clear, the hydronamics 100% fit aslo - which I've carefully checked - see my only outputs under this name.
The dog scurrying between the bench and the water is the biggest load of old tosh I have ever heard, if Nicola went into the water you would not have been able to pull the dog away from the bank, he would have been going back and forth along the bank, the dog isnt a human who lost their keys and starts retracing their steps to see if it jogs their memory, they are a dog whose best human mate has just fell in the water, they arent going anywhere but the river bank, not running back to the bench to check if they really saw her fall in the water, its nonsense.
Excellent review of the documentary. It highlights what the issues are very clearly. It’s very sniffy why there was early retirements and the death of the gold commander and even more so when Aderly stated that there was no need to carry out a post mortem
The horrible death of Willow’s vetrinarian too shortly after Nicola’s death. She said she was being followed and was terrified. She fled the area and booked into a hotel down South. She was found dead in the bath having bled to death from lacerations.
@@FleetwoodLass ah so no link at all then , nothing to see there? Just a coincidence? Her death itself was also very suspicious. It left lots of unanswered questions. Just another coincidence. Let’s list all the “coincidences” . … they will lead to the truth.
Hi Luke , have any of the mainstream tv or newspapers picked up on Peters evidence or do you think they may have been told not to . I haven’t seen it anywhere apart from social media .
Newspapers have ish, but I don’t think it’s even been mentioned on the tv news. So I still don’t think this is being taken seriously as a result. It needs looking into fully with experts alongside Peter & the technology manufacturers! He shouldn’t have been excluded from key events, it’s just made this case look like a farce & a cover up. I really feel for Nicolas Parents on that regard. This was a person who had gone missing and she deserved respect throughout the case, the policing report should have redeemed that but it didn’t in my opinion it just showed up more errors.
Well done, Luke. I have the following to say: On one of DJE Media’s videos at the time, a man who was standing near the bench told him that it wasn’t true that Willow was running between the bench and the kissing gate - Willow was actually trying to get over the stile, but this is still not between the bench and the river and doesn’t fit the statements from Lancashire Police. The images from Peter’s search for Nicola were released a while ago - I’m sure that it wouldn’t have been Peter who released them at this stage, so who did? From every video I’ve seen of the riverbank, on the many channels I’ve watched, it is certainly not steep. As for Rebecca Smith - she was sitting there looking all smarmy, when Peter Faulding’s name was mentioned. How dare she!!! After what her police force did to him, I hope that one of these days, she ends up wearing her smarm on the other side of her face and swallows her words. Lancashire Police are certainly hiding something!!! None of this sits right with me.
Agreed … willow was running between bench and wooden stile to the right of the bench it sat on it.. I can’t help but think she entered the water in the little grassy meadow area
Only Peter himself and College of Policing had actual copies of the SGI sonar images !!! So the question would be who sent them to a user called ‘404 not found’ who shared them publicly months ago z?
I also sent a letter re the 3 video`s weird suspicious video`s that were made before she went missing that I reported to Lancashire police on the 3/2 to the coroner and subsquently the day after disappeared off line . These were made on One in 2021 and three others on the 12th 20th and 22nd July 2022 . Three of these video`s follow the exact footpath which Nicola would have taken and filming round the bench ,red brick building, beaches ,but there is more to it than just these video`s . I have never had anything back from the coroner .I am not saying the person who made the video`s had anything to do with Nicola but they worried me enough to report them .
Did anyone else see Curtis Arnold’s video of Nicola’s body being dragged over bushes up the bank? It looked like a training exercise with a dummy on a rope. Two coppers in the water, (no forensics or divers) and two coppers stood on the bank laughing and joking. They used a tarp to try and cover her but they failed miserably. Sky News filmed the same thing - they were stood next to Curtis. His video was quickly removed from TikTok. That footage should have been shown at the inquest as questions should have been answered about how they handled her body. It also baffles me how a psychic travelled 60 miles from Manchester for a morning stroll and just happened to find her body 🤔.
We had a bad storm that weekend. He just used his brains. I had awoken that morning and said to my partner..well if she's in the river she will come up to the surface today in this weather. Also there's a timescale for bodies resurfacing and that weekend was it.
"They" stated Nikki was treated with dignity, I wholeheartedly disagree, I saw for myself how she was roughly handled. No surprises here re comments on Peter's involvement, respect to him & his team. RIP Nikki 🙏❤️🙏 Jackie x
There was no mention of anything conflicting to the police theory . It was all in a neat box around the narrative , putting the case to bed , closing the door on any other theories
Luke is it possible to do an independent follow up film by a reputable film director re unanswered question's to include all of Peter's scientific evidence?
It’s what they didn’t say in the documentary that speaks volumes. The whole thing was off and seemed fake except for her poor mum and dad. Really didn’t warm to the brother in law either but don’t know why 🤷🏻♀️
i can accept that she fell in the river but i cant understand how they didnt find her straight away. They were diving in the river fairly quickly so she couldnt have moved much
The Very second i seen the image i could see exactly how Nicola was positioned, i even worked out the shadow before i read Peters description! The police cant deny they didn't know what they were looking at because it's clear as day!!
Was the dog's vet brutally murdered too? It's sad I can see her ear and ponytail. I sure hope they get to the bottom of this. I have followed it from the very beginning and was glued to every bit of info about it. I personally think she found out something going on and it is being covered up. Also the back path from Inskip leads to the river. Maybe someone with gym gear was able to run the back field to the river It looks like it's not that far of a run for someone who is used to it.
I do think it was Nichola getting into the car, but hang on , was Paul so enamoured with Nichola he CCTV,d her daily , yet he kept that particular CCTV how expedient. Yes Nichola was in a rush , but Paul wasn’t in a rush to marry the mother of his two daughters . What about his failed Businesses.
I feel so sorry for peter faulding .i hope this case gets looked into again. Feel so bad for the parents .but the family deserve the truth . Well done luke . Really love watching your channel x
Peter is a good honest man, he give up five days of his and his teams time and flew down to help look for my friends son which the river safety campaign has been set up from. Upmost respect for him and the team. Sad to see the police try and discredit their work
This treatment meted to Peter, a highly respected professional in his field, is nothing short of disgraceful, and, in fact, unprofessional. Peter was volunteering!! Nicola’s case will remain a matter of debate and suspicion for a long time yet.
I believe there WAS an altercation that morning and someone local was involved, and that it probably had unintended consequences......from that moment on with everything that happened (or didn't happen) is what makes this case sooooo strange. People in high places with influence have made sure this all got swept under the carpet.....without question!!!
@@jasonking1948 And the person involved tethered Willow to the bench so she couldn't go in after Nicola as spaniel most surely would have! I'm still baffled by the Fitbit recording a heartbeat days after she is supposed to have entered the water. All the research I've done on said Fitbit says not possible!
@mikeellis2677 it still showed a heartbeat 2hrs after she apparently entered the water 🤔🤔 a point ignored at the inquest.....like.almost everything you would ha e expected to be questioned. 100% cover up at inquest imo. Also, why was no GPS data stated at the inquest. It would have shown jn exact detail when and where her body was at that time and thereafter. 🤔🤔🙈🙈🙈
@robee480 Everything in this case was dismissed from day 1. I can't remember any part of this investigation that was done in a way you would expect, going right through to the inquest. Cover up and pre-defined outcome from the very start!!!!
If Nicola went into the river, there is no way her dog would not have gone in after her. The dog would have been wet for a start. Someone took her amd held her. Someone had been in that mans caravan, but no forensic s done? I believe she was put in the river at a later date, very convientky in a place of the river nearest to the road. A lot of insurance money at stake. Someone has got away with murder
I thought exactly same at the time. She was taken and body put there at a later date. Absolutely no way her body wouldn't have been found earlier otherwise.
😢 Fantastic Review of the Documentary - 👍 But I've not seen any interview or anything about the last person that supposedly was the last person to see Willow, what time did she go there did she hear the 2 screams did she see this man in black, this is the lady from the caravan site who didn't like dogs off their leads in the field wasn't it said over the time of nicola missing that this lady found willow and tied the dog up with rope ! Wouldn't the dog even show her where nicola was, or wouldn't she have even seen anything herself ? if nicola was in the water? It seems very strange to me that Willow was only seen running up and down from the gate to the bench where his lead or harness was He would be near the water agitated, wouldn't he ! Don't add up 😮
Brill from the start I felt foul play, how did they miss her for all that time, if I fell in a river I know my dog would jump in after me…….rest in peace nicola. Xx
The Police could hardly admit that the target was NB. They would have looked incompetent to say the least. Could they then risk her body surfacing? They didn’t know this it varies. That’s why I believe she was moved so that the police were not blamed and PF was wrong. This is a possibility? I know it’s grotesque but people would do anything to evade the truth.
As if PA hasnt made enough money out of Nikkis tragic death,nigh on 40,000 GFM,life insurance,probably house paid off,how very sad that so much money has been made from her sad demise,😢Why on earth would anyone want to relive that for money ?
Wow, I found your channel out of interest as all along I had a gut feeling the police did not handle the case well from the beginning. A lot of things didn’t add up. Very interesting you interviewed Peter Faulding. I had a feeling he was scape goated and now (thanks to you) that becomes more clear! 👏
Many of the questions you ask at the beginning of the video regarding unnecessary dramatisation of events could, in my opinion be equally applied to the Maddy “story” . The truth will probably never be allowed to be spoken . It’s spooky , a lot like the “government”.
Peter should have been at the inquest.There were some big egos at play here.He was talking to the press.They would not have liked that.They used his own words against him without giving him the chance to defend himself.
@@chriscaldwell5422 hi, yes this was on 04/02/23. They pulled a green chair out exactly where PF got his target. They didn’t find NB.This suggests to me that the culprits thought this area was now clear. and placed NB at this site. PF target was on 07/02/23. This case needs reopening. Something is very sniffy here. If PF target was NB, how did she get from there to where she was found without anybody spotting her? And how did she get over the rocky outcrop over the weir? She would have got snagged up there?
@@raylittle8607I believe she got over the weir on the 19th of feb because that was the first high tide since Nicola disappeared meaning tonnes more water passed through the area of the bench and over the weir making it very easy to pick her up and take her over the weir. The current and extra water on this day would of made it easy to get her over the weir and this is how they were able to predict when she would be found
The woman who said she found Willow running around " Giddy " is the same woman Nicola had run in 's with in the past about dogs running loose. others must remember this too...aand that Nicola stayed away from the edge of water, she was scared of it, again something others have known ...a longtime ago now, but I remember them.
Pethaps police were so sure she was in rive was because peter was in fact right about the spot.when their own divers check ed the area did they find her after all but kept it secret knowing she would surface in time they were very confident she was in water.
He did say she was not in water.. And caviar dogs ate trained to pick up dead body smells frm yards away.. When they went out.. Not one off them picked her scent up.. 🤦👎
The first thing I said about the documentary was that footage on the drive when Nikki is getting the girls and the dog in the car, I said she seemed upset or annoyed at something, they didn’t exchange any words, when your getting kids ready you engage in some kind of conversation, like, did you pick up the girls school bag, did you do this or that, what time you home, see you soon, anything, but there was nothing not even eye contact. Also, I don't trust the police, it's not the first time they cover things up or change a narrative, but Peter Faulding is a professional, he has a lot to lose like his reputation, he wouldn't risk lying, I totally believe Peter, and I hope he knows that some of us do fully support him and he does fantastic work helping families. I hope he's OK 🙏🏻
Its all very strange, I wonder what Peter really thinks about all this that he cannot say. The fact that the police wouldn't allow him to check the following day stinks!
First scream 09.18 just as her fitbit paces 273 from 09.15 (2.5 minutes walking) ceased and phone reached bench. The bank is 45 degrees. It isn't steep. Second scream 09.40am. Willow ran BETWEEN bench and THE STILE TO HIDDEN FIELD AND WAS TRYING TO CLIMB OVER IT. My opinion: Nicola, if she reached field, was attacked by the 3 people seen with her. Isla Trequaur said there was a duscussion about a lead. Penny was seen with hammer in her hand to allegedly fix fencing with 2 men. I believe she was attacked from the upper field at 09.16am and grappled causing bruising to her upper arms fore and aft. She was pushed into the river by persons undecided and screamed the first time as water echoes sound to near the church yard. She fell onto where there is a wall at the bottom and that is why she hit a brick wall causing contusions to her chin and mouth abd nose as blood was evident. They thought she was dead but her body didnt sink. They realised they couldn't leave her there. Penny leaves to ring the police about a loose dog whom she has tied up. I believe Penny did this so she hoped the police would find Nicola in the river and ut would be considered an accident. Penny did not like Nicola. There were financial issues. Nicola had secured her mortgage. The police do not arrive but Penny leaves promptly for an appt. I believe she went to get a van and to call her sister and daughter in law and to remove the cctv from the upper field or claim it was broken. I believe she may even have been disposing of evidence as she went to the dump allegedly. Realising her body didn't sink or float away she was removed from the water pissible using the lead which caused bruising to her upper arms as they dragged her out. She is not dead but unconscious. She was dragged over the stile causing bruising to her back and part of the stile to break. So one if not two men did this. In the process one of her boots was lost in the river. The bruising to her back was possibly caused in dragging her through the hidden field to the other side entrance to the farm by the tow path. She was taken to the farm where she came around, screamed again near allotment lane and her head was forced into a muddy pool by someone stepling on her back and the back of her thigh. (Only 20ml water in stomach which can take 7 pints and lungs which can take 4 pints) and possibly hit with a large square object causing a broken eye socket and bridge of nose and killed. The motive being money and property and assets. I think this started out as a GFM for money to pay a debt. Possibly a drug debt given the connection to the drug world. I think Nicola fought back and thus lost her life. Ron knows His wife knows Penny knows Her Grandsons know Anne Marie Knows Her spouse knows Paul knows They are all members of the same family. Nicola and Paul have rented an office on the camp site. Ron claimed not to know them but in the same Sky interview where he almost said Paul in his pretence not to know him he then states angrily 'Then Paul Arrived'. As if Paul were some sort of nusiance. Rubbish. Ron also claimed he found the phone but he never mentions a tied up dog. Why would Penny tie the dog up and not take Willow and the phone with her. Clearly the dog was an issue. Clearly this is what started the argument. Clearly this is why Penny called the police at 09.30am. Clearly this is why she never came to coroner's. Clearly tbis is why cctv is missing as grandson said it was working. The sister suspects. The parents suspect. Emma may know or may want to wash her hands of it as that is her body language. And if none of this is true then Nicola is elsewhere and this has all been a bad film choreographed for money. Or Nicola is in protective custody. But somehow i think they acted upon something for a monetary motive. Maybe Nicola was digging too much into the death of the engineer attached to Paul's company who was also found dead in the same river. She found impirtabt info the night before but didnt know how she was goung tondeal with it. Paul makes an odd comment in the end of the documentary when he says he sees Nicola in the girls and then he says that makes it all worthwhile. He also couldnt say her name and reiterated 'my girls'. He may not have pulled the trigger but he is involved. What exactly did he mean by seeing Nicola in her children made it all worthwhile. Thats as odd as 'its like a dream!' Mmh. What really goes on at that Camp Site. A lady who can't stand other people's dogs off leads has now got every tracker dog in the country watching her.
Penny Fletcher was key, remember Penny had threatened to shoot loose dogs with her gun, why was she granted a gun licence ? And there had been an altercation between Nichola and Penny regarding Willow not always being on her lead. Hmm
Penny and her family were sketchy and threatening. Penny get your gun should be checked for dementia and her gun confiscated. I too had wondered if Nichola was In Protection. I did wonder re Lawson too.
@@Anita-gp1gv I wonder if the Investigating officer Lawson is related to the friend of Paul called Andy Lawson who helped set up the GFM. How do you die of natural causes at 50 years old?
@@len6871 There was likely a collar. WE haven't had dog tag confirmed. But a vet would read the chip in a dog. Silly to leave a dog and phone for almost 2 hours without doing anything with either.
Im gona be honest i have looked at Peters pictures and i dont see anything but im also not a professional in this so i cant tell. But i have to say this all of this is so shady i never trusted Paul i remember the interview he did and Willow didnt wanted to be near him she went to the host instead. Also Willow is a Springer Spaniel and she wasnt even wet and that is really strange because they are so attached to their owner. Also if i have been through a hugh trauma i would not play a role like Paul in a documentary he seems like he is some kind of star now i dont trust him at all
the partner has probably been able to pay off his debts that had been accumalated previous to this sad case........i guess because the go fund me was shut down earlier on in this has now been compensated.....set up by nicola s friend soon after she went missing.........check the slagging off social media by the partner................something is off here.....
That's a great question - what are they getting out of doing the documentary? Nicola was a missing person who has now been found. It was very sad but it's not like they need to re-enact it in order to find her or an attacker. It would make more sense if someone like the MCcans took part in a re- enactment but they don't.
Peter doesn't deserve all the s**t he's had thrown at him, i think hes a decent genuine guy and he just really wanted to help the family, i think they came across as ungrateful on the documentary not one of them had anything positive to say about him, its so unfair 😔
What do the police have to gain in not investigating this properly? Why was it in their interest not to find the body when Peter identified it? Why are they reporting Willow running between the seat and the river if she was running between the seat and the gate? I have worked for a police service and in various government roles and we may not have liked it when someone pointed out our mistakes or oversights but it didn't stop us acting responsibly. Peter iniatially trusted the Police because he was use to being able to trust them, what was different here and why?
Why did Paul change his timeline when we know school could not have called him at 10.30am. Becky Smith could have got LP to remove Nicola and use Rothwell to find her on set date. Rothwell - arrested by Becky in 2016 Arrested with another chap called Ansell Paul looking over wall near location of find night before at 10.30pm. Is this all for real.
Hi Luke, You mused that NB looked angry when she marched to the car in the cctv clip. I have seen a video by Danbers Ecitsuj where you hear one of the girls coming through the gate, saying “why do you row”. This would explain why the whole clip was not released too! See “Nicola Bulley The New ‘Old’ CCTV”. The child’s words are right at the beginning of this video.
I had heard it said about the dog going between the bench & the river at the time. RUclipsr Michelle Walks mentions it. I believe Peter faulding did find her, I don’t understand what happened with the police not finding her then. Maybe a matter of their arrogance, being reluctant to accept outside assistance, incompetence or miscommunication? It seems there are no independent sonar experts in the U.K. to interpret the images / data currently. I hope in time this all comes out.
If you would like to support the channel allowing me to spend more time making videos please visit the this link ko-fi.com/breaktheice
@@Breaktheice123 Thank goodness for people like you and Peter who want the truth to come out. I appreciate everything you do I know it’s a lot of work. 💕🇨🇦
@@sharont5742i appreciate that, thank you
USA has some videos with his find, peter failing..yes and debate about his effort.
It takes a very brave man, and a very confident man to come out and tell the truth like this. This is David versus Goliath and Peter is just one man. He needs the support of the public to get behind him and put pressure on the college of policing and Lancashire police to reveal what information.they had. There sre so many unanswered questions and another investigation really needs to be opened up but this is only going to happen with public pressure. Nicola deserves this otherwise her legacy will be forever mired with the words shambolic, lies, corruption, ineptitude, mistrust and we the public deserve a police force that we can trust.
Have you seen the latest ? Peter Bleksley shoving in the narrative again good gawd ! saying that the so called expert searching the water in the Nicola Bulley case ,and online sleuths 🥵 ,he is talking about the girl who has gone missing in yorkshire, I asked if this was bbc ,Apparently its talk tv
My 21 y/o Daughter was followed along the River Wyre early this Summer by a man who threatened her.
She thankfully came across an old gentleman who asked her if she was ok as he could see she was distressed.
The man following her (white male, 30-40 years old) was on a push bike, dressed all in black wearing a black beanie (even though it was a warm day).
We reported it to the police and strangely enough they said he was already known to them from his description and behavior.
I would certainly like to know who this man in black is and why Lancashire Police know of him.
I remember clearly what Peter Faulding said about the man in black.
Oh dear, glad she is safe
How did he threaten your daughter? If you don't mind saying. Must have been very frightening for her! 💙
Did your daughter get a good look at his face at all?
@@queenofhearts6127 One of the perverts
Oh my darling, that is terrifying. Thank god she’s ok
I remember early on in the case there was mention of a man at another yet nearby river location, and it was questioned whether he played a role.
Personally, I think that the image of the man Peter Faulding noted was behaving strangely and asked a press photographer to capture ought to be released.
Peter is salt of the earth
Stand by him 100%
I will always believe Peter found Nicola that day 💯it’s just sad he was treated really bad for telling the truth 🏆
I think Peter was stopped because if Nikola was found to soon it would show how she died. Got to wait longer for decomposition...
Peter Faulding you are an absolute Professional and the Police should have warranted your help.
I will NEVER belive Nicola just fell into the river….never God love her 💔
I agree l have never believed she would ever had left her children the police are incompetent! So sad
Why?
2 and half ft deep I believe ?..... something smells really bad on this case ..
Neither will I
Hope Peter is OK! I'm sick of hearing people disrespecting him. 🤬
@Worldagenda24 Me too!
@@alisonriley763❤
@@Mysticalmagicalcastle justice ⚖ for niki
Peter was helping out of his own good free of charge & still gets stick you can’t win these days
@Worldagenda24 I am too especially when people who have no knowledge of this stuff and they are trying to contradict him when he is an expert in his field 🙄 I don't understand why people think that he would have an agenda to come forward and challenge the powers that be publicly and possibly damage his reputation by doing so I can't stand when some creators won't even consider police corruption when we often see evidence of it and lots of it imo
The only reason that peter said she wasn't in the river is because the police divers said it was branches so why would he disbelieve the police not being truthful...but they wouldnt let him scan again or dive to see for himself...that is suspicious in itself.
Exactly and poor chap probably wishes he’d just never said anything about her not being there.
I find it all very confusing, like why did Lancashire police hide the fact that Peter found Nikki when it proves she was below the bench in that river 70 meters down confirming LP hypotheses were correct all along? 🤔
@@Mark-gtiQuite, he was confirming their hypothesis. A set up.
Special 'Branch' will investigate. Supposedly.🤭
I did hear Paul & Nicola argued the night before and it continued into the next morning.
I didn't watch this documentary because I knew it would stick to the same narrative as given from the beginning.....and I've never believed she simply fell in the river.
Totally agree. She looked pissed off in the House film footage.
Yes, on the cctv of the girls going to the car for school in the morning, one of them asks why they are always rowing, it's sad.
I didn’t know this but she did look very annoyed in the morning on the CCTV
After the inquest, Nicola's family said that they " now wanted to be left alone!" So why make a documentary. My feeling is that a "certain" family member is worried that the public are still talking about Nicola, and are still saying that the whole case was very suspicious. Certain people are panicking that the truth WILL eventually come out! And Peter was made a scapegoat in all of this. Have we ever before seen a documentary such as this, where "grieving" family appear as actors, in a documentary made simply and solely to push the narrative surrounding the circumstances surrounding the death. This to me shouts Desperation! Excellent video Luke. 👏👏💙
Yes the truth finally comes out whether 5 yrs, 10 yrs, 20 yrs etc. There is no hiding place for those who have done wrong anymore. Hope I'm around to see the truth..
Agree. They still need to create the narrative in our minds that they wish us to believe.
Perhaps they made the documentary so that the whole family could stop the speculation and maybe they were advised too.
I didn't realised someone in the police died on the investigation. Did anyone get what it was of?
I always found one thing so different about this case and that was ni press conference woth the family Paul etc together.
Or did I miss it? As normal procedure you fave cameras together in paticular the partner does and then they put out a direct message to the missing loved one.
That I don't remember.
I will always believe Peter and I will back him until the day justice is served
I feel so bad for Peter. He did so much for this family and the police only to be thrown under the bus. This is what you get for helping people. I can't believe they then defamed him again in the documentary. He should sue.
No good deed goes unpunished
Watch Adventures with Purpose, it will show you exactly what this sonar can do. Anyone doing this work is doing a fantastic job. It's all so very sad. 😔
I believe she was murdered.
So do I 🦘🇦🇺
@@theresearmstrong357same 🇬🇧
Oh one hundred percent she was murdered
Peter Faulding was indeed scapegoated!
Same
They ignored Peters evidence because they couldn’t afford to find her body because they needed time for deterioration of evidence of foul play
What evidence do you think they could have been covering up?
That’s my theory too.
They wanted her to decompose to cover up the fact that she was injured or knocked unconscious before going into that river.
The river there is so narrow at that point and at that time of the day there is no current whatsoever. There’s even little steps built into the bank right at the bench and rocks to stand on.
If she fell in conscious, she would have easily been able to climb out.
As for cold water shock - if she was an elderly lady I could believe that but she was a fit and active young woman with no heart problems.
Signs of beating, noxious substances, DNA evidence
Two screams could be the dog pushing her over and the second being her hitting the rocks?
It's definitely steep and long drop, go and see it.
The sky report says it's a drop after the bank rolls down to that point.
Why is no one acknowledging the other deaths on the river that weren't treated as conspiracies?
@@queenofhearts6127No current? It's a river by definition it's moving inland water, aka a river.
If it was a small river it would be called a stream, brook....
Question:Was the case hijacked by the government to shut down social media?
Bingo
All a psyop to control SM, yes.
@@mojo2679 But WHY? I read someone 's comment recently that the family's dog's VET also died just afterwards , AND a police Detective/Inspector?
@@susandouglas4470The vet worked at a different branch of Moys than Nicola and Willow went to
Just consider all the things that point to foul play. Then imagine if her body was found earlier. Would that have shown foul play?
exactly!
I'm glad Luke has stuck by Peter ❤
I don't believe the story about her drowning in this tiny river - she wasn't a baby so even if the water levels were higher than the TV footage shows she'd have been able to get herself out. The behaviour of the police and the media was really strange and the whole thing stinks of a cover up.
The whole investigation smells of something really, really ODD. Discrepancies & inconsistencies from start to finish which made it look and feel like NOT YOUR AVERAGE MISSING PERSON.
Cover up for what though?
I'm not sure what to believe but I do remember locals being interviewed saying the river suddenly gets 18ft deep in many places even if the edges seem very shallow. Her husbands slightly bruised eye was very troubling but its standard for Police to look for scratches etc elsewhere too on partners to discount them , so I assume he had a verified explanation re his eye.
@@sarahholland2600 I think it was org crime. I think there was a visit by crims to their house on that eve in Jan when they were both beaten. I think that when she then went missing it was either the crims Delivering in their final warning Or covert ops removing her to witness protection. Either way it explains the resignation to her disappearance and the family’s acquiescence. Also the Derek Clayton, vet links etc .
@@carolineblackledge8912 Police & paramedics were called to their home 10 days prior. I feel that might explain a lot but we arent allowed to know the details. Plus stopping taking her HRT if she'd been v depressed re menopause etc was a v v bad idea. I wonder why she stopped taking them.
We can’t all be wrong Luke when we all scream foul play surely they would want the truth & justice for Nicola 😥😥😥
Too many people think foul play
I can't understand all those people there that morning yet nobody looked in the river it's the first thing you would do.
@@LisaPaine-st2yx There were also cadavre dogs on the river - how come they didn’t pick up the scent?
It was shady right from the start, it had the distinct feeling of secrecy.
Same
I keep coming back to the idea that Ansell got one of the Fletchers to bump her off. That family aren't the nicest lot. Quentin had been suspended from Garstang Community Academy (so was presumably present on Allotment Lane that morning). Oscar and Toby have got previous for sorting out debts with a baseball bat. Aaron's constantly in and out of prison for assaulting and stalking women. If (hypothetically) Ansell wanted her out of the picture, what better family to turn to for assistance, conveniently living a few metres away from her daily dog walk? Never forget that 2 different witnesses heard a woman screaming.
Never forget
I've visited St Michael's on several occasions and I'm telling you that the slope from the bench to the river is not steep. Indeed, the last time I was there I saw a mother sitting on the bench looking at her mobile while her toddlers played on the slope. The theory that Nicola walked to the river's edge to attach the lead to Willow, stumbled and fell into the river is illogical given the position of the lead found on day one. The lead was found half-way between the bench and river's edge. If Nicola had attempted to attach the lead to the dog on the river's edge and the dog had jumped up and knocked her backwards, then she would have either fallen into the river with the lead still in her hand or the lead would have been in the river - it was found half-way up the slope. If Nicola had attempted to attach the lead to the dog from the position of it found on day one and stumbled there would have been sufficient time for Nicola to have regained her footing before the river's edge. Anyway, what sane person would walk to the river's edge to attach a lead to a dog? The theory suggested by the Bulley family is pie in the sky.
Good info David
Agree
See, I think differently, when I went I thought the bank was much more steep than it appears in photos.
Thankyou Luke for sharing your perspective of that documentary and the case in general. Another super episode. Keep up the good work 🙏
Thank you to you blind bee for being a rare member and really supporting the channel. I very much appreciate you
It is still a mystery. There was also something odd about the death of Willow's vet apparently as well. No idea if it is connected and now a young mother has disappeared in Yorkshire in similar circumstances to Nicola. Sometimes these cases get solved years later.
@Angela. What happened to the vet?
This will be interesting to watch! Looking forward to it ❤
I 100% believe Peter Faulding. The so called officials including the coroner should explain their reasoning for not taking Peter’s evidence into account when it was clearly evident that there was a solar image of a body in the river
Fascinating. Thank you so much!
Thank you..new there's more to come that will shed light. For the brainwashed and sceptics
poor peter he was being proffesional he trusted police😢
Yeah, like we are brought up to
Shocking! They've definitely made him the fall guy. Will you be having Peter on again?
I may have him on again at some point
@Breaktheice123 Hope so 😃 thank you
Evening Luke, I've spent 30 years as an academic in field studies in the aquatic environment (H index 26), 100% agree that Peter found Nicola in early Feb 23, its cyrstal clear, the hydronamics 100% fit aslo - which I've carefully checked - see my only outputs under this name.
The dog scurrying between the bench and the water is the biggest load of old tosh I have ever heard, if Nicola went into the water you would not have been able to pull the dog away from the bank, he would have been going back and forth along the bank, the dog isnt a human who lost their keys and starts retracing their steps to see if it jogs their memory, they are a dog whose best human mate has just fell in the water, they arent going anywhere but the river bank, not running back to the bench to check if they really saw her fall in the water, its nonsense.
Excellent review of the documentary. It highlights what the issues are very clearly. It’s very sniffy why there was early retirements and the death of the gold commander and even more so when Aderly stated that there was no need to carry out a post mortem
The horrible death of Willow’s vetrinarian too shortly after Nicola’s death.
She said she was being followed and was terrified.
She fled the area and booked into a hotel down South.
She was found dead in the bath having bled to death from lacerations.
@@queenofhearts6127she worked at a different branch of Moys than the one Nicola went to.
@@FleetwoodLass ah so no link at all then , nothing to see there? Just a coincidence? Her death itself was also very suspicious. It left lots of unanswered questions. Just another coincidence. Let’s list all the “coincidences” . … they will lead to the truth.
@@carolineblackledge8912I have no opinion on that, just stating a fact as someone who uses the same vets.
Sorry watching late Luke but love your channel you are a great guy justice for Nicola Bulley ❤xx
Cheers Vicky
@Breaktheice123 u welcome Luke need more people like u xx
Hi Luke , have any of the mainstream tv or newspapers picked up on Peters evidence or do you think they may have been told not to . I haven’t seen it anywhere apart from social media .
Newspapers have ish, but I don’t think it’s even been mentioned on the tv news. So I still don’t think this is being taken seriously as a result. It needs looking into fully with experts alongside Peter & the technology manufacturers! He shouldn’t have been excluded from key events, it’s just made this case look like a farce & a cover up. I really feel for Nicolas Parents on that regard. This was a person who had gone missing and she deserved respect throughout the case, the policing report should have redeemed that but it didn’t in my opinion it just showed up more errors.
Unless it's my imagination but it's all being kept CLOSE/ CLOSED TO SOMEONES CHEST!!!!!!!!!!
Well done, Luke. I have the following to say:
On one of DJE Media’s videos at the time, a man who was standing near the bench told him that it wasn’t true that Willow was running between the bench and the kissing gate - Willow was actually trying to get over the stile, but this is still not between the bench and the river and doesn’t fit the statements from Lancashire Police.
The images from Peter’s search for Nicola were released a while ago - I’m sure that it wouldn’t have been Peter who released them at this stage, so who did?
From every video I’ve seen of the riverbank, on the many channels I’ve watched, it is certainly not steep.
As for Rebecca Smith - she was sitting there looking all smarmy, when Peter Faulding’s name was mentioned. How dare she!!! After what her police force did to him, I hope that one of these days, she ends up wearing her smarm on the other side of her face and swallows her words. Lancashire Police are certainly hiding something!!!
None of this sits right with me.
Agreed … willow was running between bench and wooden stile to the right of the bench it sat on it.. I can’t help but think she entered the water in the little grassy meadow area
@@annehaywood-fi8pefully agree 👍
@@annehaywood-fi8pe Did you ever watch Eddy's Vinyl Break's videos on the Nicola Bulley case?
Only Peter himself and College of Policing had actual copies of the SGI sonar images !!! So the question would be who sent them to a user called ‘404 not found’ who shared them publicly months ago z?
A few but he rattled on so much I got fed up
Great video Luke
Cheers creepy channel title person 👀
I also sent a letter re the 3 video`s weird suspicious video`s that were made before she went missing that I reported to Lancashire police on the 3/2 to the coroner and subsquently the day after disappeared off line . These were made on One in 2021 and three others on the 12th 20th and 22nd July 2022 . Three of these video`s follow the exact footpath which Nicola would have taken and filming round the bench ,red brick building, beaches ,but there is more to it than just these video`s . I have never had anything back from the coroner .I am not saying the person who made the video`s had anything to do with Nicola but they worried me enough to report them .
Looking at those eyes throught the rear mirror reminded me of coxkt Gerry McCann. We all know he's a bullshitter.
Was the man in black ever identified... No....
Creepy name
Did anyone else see Curtis Arnold’s video of Nicola’s body being dragged over bushes up the bank?
It looked like a training exercise with a dummy on a rope.
Two coppers in the water, (no forensics or divers) and two coppers stood on the bank laughing and joking.
They used a tarp to try and cover her but they failed miserably.
Sky News filmed the same thing - they were stood next to Curtis.
His video was quickly removed from TikTok.
That footage should have been shown at the inquest as questions should have been answered about how they handled her body.
It also baffles me how a psychic travelled 60 miles from Manchester for a morning stroll and just happened to find her body 🤔.
Yes, and the police laughing.
Yes I saw it! It was highly disrespectful.
We had a bad storm that weekend. He just used his brains. I had awoken that morning and said to my partner..well if she's in the river she will come up to the surface today in this weather. Also there's a timescale for bodies resurfacing and that weekend was it.
"They" stated Nikki was treated with dignity, I wholeheartedly disagree, I saw for myself how she was roughly handled. No surprises here re comments on Peter's involvement, respect to him & his team. RIP Nikki 🙏❤️🙏 Jackie x
Did you watch Unapologetically Me on this case, very interesting observations on the body retrieval.
I will be watching every one of the documentarys again, and again. It stinks all of it. 😤
There was no mention of anything conflicting to the police theory . It was all in a neat box around the narrative , putting the case to bed , closing the door on any other theories
Luke is it possible to do an independent follow up film by a reputable film director re unanswered question's to include all of Peter's scientific evidence?
Maybe down the line yeah
It’s what they didn’t say in the documentary that speaks volumes. The whole thing was off and seemed fake except for her poor mum and dad. Really didn’t warm to the brother in law either but don’t know why 🤷🏻♀️
@@debrathompson1972 that was a pretty good summary
i can accept that she fell in the river but i cant understand how they didnt find her straight away. They were diving in the river fairly quickly so she couldnt have moved much
She was murdered so much does not make sense and I hope the truth will come out soon
I agree
The Very second i seen the image i could see exactly how Nicola was positioned, i even worked out the shadow before i read Peters description! The police cant deny they didn't know what they were looking at because it's clear as day!!
Not to me it isnt . Even with the blue line.
Was the dog's vet brutally murdered too? It's sad I can see her ear and ponytail. I sure hope they get to the bottom of this. I have followed it from the very beginning and was glued to every bit of info about it. I personally think she found out something going on and it is being covered up. Also the back path from Inskip leads to the river. Maybe someone with gym gear was able to run the back field to the river It looks like it's not that far of a run for someone who is used to it.
Good point! I'd forgotten about the vet. Mmmm🤔
@@Mysticalmagicalcastle as far as I am aware, as it's my vets, it was a different branch of Moys than the one Nicola went to
@@FleetwoodLassyes but because same company they would cover at both beaches and all take turns on emergency duty
I do think it was Nichola getting into the car, but hang on , was Paul so enamoured with Nichola he CCTV,d her daily , yet he kept that particular CCTV how expedient. Yes Nichola was in a rush , but Paul wasn’t in a rush to marry the mother of his two daughters . What about his failed Businesses.
A MUCH BIGGER PICTURE IS EMERGING!!!!!!!!!!🤔
Blimey, they should have listened to Peter, something is obviously wrong there🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔😊😊xx
Something is defo off
All down to a police cover up
that was played out on mainstream media
we're the sketches set to lawson?
What reason do police have to cover it up.
Unless theyr involved in some way
Something is off
Big respect Luke 🫡 and Peter ❤
I feel so sorry for peter faulding .i hope this case gets looked into again.
Feel so bad for the parents .but the family deserve the truth .
Well done luke .
Really love watching your channel x
Peter is a good honest man, he give up five days of his and his teams time and flew down to help look for my friends son which the river safety campaign has been set up from. Upmost respect for him and the team. Sad to see the police try and discredit their work
Emma and paul very unsettling.
She was too involved for a non family member.
We all know about people who wanna be too involved
👍💯
Or she could have been a concerned friend…but either is possible I agree
This treatment meted to Peter, a highly respected professional in his field, is nothing short of disgraceful, and, in fact, unprofessional.
Peter was volunteering!!
Nicola’s case will remain a matter of debate and suspicion for a long time yet.
TO CREATE DEFLECTION OF SOMEONE / SOMETHING IS A CLEVER WAY OF TAKING ATTENTION AWAY FROM WHAT IS POSSIBLY GOING ON!!!!!!!!!
I believe there WAS an altercation that morning and someone local was involved, and that it probably had unintended consequences......from that moment on with everything that happened (or didn't happen) is what makes this case sooooo strange. People in high places with influence have made sure this all got swept under the carpet.....without question!!!
@@jasonking1948 And the person involved tethered Willow to the bench so she couldn't go in after Nicola as spaniel most surely would have! I'm still baffled by the Fitbit recording a heartbeat days after she is supposed to have entered the water. All the research I've done on said Fitbit says not possible!
@mikeellis2677 it still showed a heartbeat 2hrs after she apparently entered the water 🤔🤔 a point ignored at the inquest.....like.almost everything you would ha e expected to be questioned. 100% cover up at inquest imo.
Also, why was no GPS data stated at the inquest. It would have shown jn exact detail when and where her body was at that time and thereafter. 🤔🤔🙈🙈🙈
This man in black who kept getting dismissed as well 🤨🧐
@robee480 Everything in this case was dismissed from day 1. I can't remember any part of this investigation that was done in a way you would expect, going right through to the inquest. Cover up and pre-defined outcome from the very start!!!!
If Nicola went into the river, there is no way her dog would not have gone in after her. The dog would have been wet for a start. Someone took her amd held her. Someone had been in that mans caravan, but no forensic s done?
I believe she was put in the river at a later date, very convientky in a place of the river nearest to the road. A lot of insurance money at stake. Someone has got away with
murder
I thought exactly same at the time. She was taken and body put there at a later date. Absolutely no way her body wouldn't have been found earlier otherwise.
Nichola was a good swimmer and her dog was always playing in the water. But she was dry
😢 Fantastic Review of the Documentary - 👍
But I've not seen any interview or anything about the last person that supposedly was the last person to see Willow, what time did she go there did she hear the 2 screams did she see this man in black, this is the lady from the caravan site who didn't like dogs off their leads in the field wasn't it said over the time of nicola missing that this lady found willow and tied the dog up with rope !
Wouldn't the dog even show her where nicola was, or wouldn't she have even seen anything herself ? if nicola was in the water? It seems very strange to me that Willow was only seen running up and down from the gate to the bench where his lead or harness was
He would be near the water agitated, wouldn't he ! Don't add up 😮
Yes
Thank you for the comment i appreciate it
Brill from the start I felt foul play, how did they miss her for all that time, if I fell in a river I know my dog would jump in after me…….rest in peace nicola. Xx
RIP indeed
The Police could hardly admit that the target was NB. They would have looked incompetent to say the least. Could they then risk her body surfacing? They didn’t know this it varies. That’s why I believe she was moved so that the police were not blamed and PF was wrong. This is a possibility? I know it’s grotesque but people would do anything to evade the truth.
I believe that too
@@courtneysquill8843Me too!
What's wrong with the sister and partner, how can they take part in this mocumentary?
I found their appearance a bit strange and the whole reconstructions to be odd
As if PA hasnt made enough money out of Nikkis tragic death,nigh on 40,000 GFM,life insurance,probably house paid off,how very sad that so much money has been made from her sad demise,😢Why on earth would anyone want to relive that for money ?
This absolutely stinks. Utter red lights flashing like beacons.
Yeah re flags everywhere
Wow, I found your channel out of interest as all along I had a gut feeling the police did not handle the case well from the beginning. A lot of things didn’t add up. Very interesting you interviewed Peter Faulding. I had a feeling he was scape goated and now (thanks to you) that becomes more clear! 👏
Just reminds me of the Madeline Mccann case.... more than meets the eye...
Agree 💯
Many of the questions you ask at the beginning of the video regarding unnecessary dramatisation of events could, in my opinion be equally applied to the Maddy “story” . The truth will probably never be allowed to be spoken . It’s spooky , a lot like the “government”.
Peter was manipulated so much about him not finding the target, that he began to doubt his own mind, the term for this is gaslighting!
Yep
Replay crew gutted missed it live my notification didn't come through 😢
Did you catch up?
Yes thanks luke
Peter should have been at the inquest.There were some big egos at play here.He was talking to the press.They would not have liked that.They used his own words against him without giving him the chance to defend himself.
He should defo of been at the inquest
I never believe d a word the police said about this case very corupt
It’s all very weird isn’t it
The Police stated that the water on the dive site was very clear. So how come they didn’t see PF target? Or did they see it.?
A great question….
@@Breaktheice123can’t wait Luke 🏆
@@chriscaldwell5422 hi, yes this was on 04/02/23. They pulled a green chair out exactly where PF got his target. They didn’t find NB.This suggests to me that the culprits thought this area was now clear. and placed NB at this site. PF target was on 07/02/23. This case needs reopening. Something is very sniffy here. If PF target was NB, how did she get from there to where she was found without anybody spotting her? And how did she get over the rocky outcrop over the weir? She would have got snagged up there?
@@raylittle8607I believe she got over the weir on the 19th of feb because that was the first high tide since Nicola disappeared meaning tonnes more water passed through the area of the bench and over the weir making it very easy to pick her up and take her over the weir. The current and extra water on this day would of made it easy to get her over the weir and this is how they were able to predict when she would be found
@@Breaktheice123 I don’t buy that. What without being seen? According to the Police she was not where PF got a target so how could she crest the Weir?
The woman who said she found Willow running around " Giddy " is the same woman Nicola had run in 's with in the past about dogs running loose. others must remember this too...aand that Nicola stayed away from the edge of water, she was scared of it, again something others have known ...a longtime ago now, but I remember them.
Yeah I thought that old bird was dodgie to...gotta trust your gut ay
And Nicola's parents stated that Nicola was a strong swimmer. A friend also said on camera that Nicola had received an award for diving.
This whole case was a f up feel for Peter he went there and done it for free to help good man
Indeed. It’s a really odd case
Why was willow bone dry there would have been dew on grass really odd no barking either
I do think she saw someone she recognised who would give the "stay" command and she would obey.
Pethaps police were so sure she was in rive was because peter was in fact right about the spot.when their own divers check ed the area did they find her after all but kept it secret knowing she would surface in time they were very confident she was in water.
If that is true then we know they needed her to stay there for a length of time.
@@carolineblackledge8912who are they covering for?
@@ScentAngel22organised drug crimes
@@courtneysquill8843That has been suggested!
He did say she was not in water.. And caviar dogs ate trained to pick up dead body smells frm yards away.. When they went out.. Not one off them picked her scent up.. 🤦👎
I always thought Nicola's body language displayed alot of annoyance too.
Yeah she looked annoyed I think
The first thing I said about the documentary was that footage on the drive when Nikki is getting the girls and the dog in the car, I said she seemed upset or annoyed at something, they didn’t exchange any words, when your getting kids ready you engage in some kind of conversation, like, did you pick up the girls school bag, did you do this or that, what time you home, see you soon, anything, but there was nothing not even eye contact. Also, I don't trust the police, it's not the first time they cover things up or change a narrative, but Peter Faulding is a professional, he has a lot to lose like his reputation, he wouldn't risk lying, I totally believe Peter, and I hope he knows that some of us do fully support him and he does fantastic work helping families. I hope he's OK 🙏🏻
@@Colquhoun2676 he does know you support him cos I just screen shotted him this message 😃
@Breaktheice123 Thank you 😊 and thank you for your work too, love listening to your show, I'm glad Peter knows he has supporters 🙏🏻
Yes and u notice that willow wouldn't go near Paul.. Looked scared dog was panicked by him.. Seen the video off him rushed morning..
Excellent work thank you.
Its all very strange, I wonder what Peter really thinks about all this that he cannot say. The fact that the police wouldn't allow him to check the following day stinks!
First scream 09.18 just as her fitbit paces 273 from 09.15 (2.5 minutes walking) ceased and phone reached bench.
The bank is 45 degrees. It isn't steep.
Second scream 09.40am.
Willow ran BETWEEN bench and THE STILE TO HIDDEN FIELD AND WAS TRYING TO CLIMB OVER IT.
My opinion:
Nicola, if she reached field, was attacked by the 3 people seen with her. Isla Trequaur said there was a duscussion about a lead.
Penny was seen with hammer in her hand to allegedly fix fencing with 2 men.
I believe she was attacked from the upper field at 09.16am and grappled causing bruising to her upper arms fore and aft.
She was pushed into the river by persons undecided and screamed the first time as water echoes sound to near the church yard. She fell onto where there is a wall at the bottom and that is why she hit a brick wall causing contusions to her chin and mouth abd nose as blood was evident. They thought she was dead but her body didnt sink. They realised they couldn't leave her there.
Penny leaves to ring the police about a loose dog whom she has tied up. I believe Penny did this so she hoped the police would find Nicola in the river and ut would be considered an accident. Penny did not like Nicola. There were financial issues. Nicola had secured her mortgage.
The police do not arrive but Penny leaves promptly for an appt. I believe she went to get a van and to call her sister and daughter in law and to remove the cctv from the upper field or claim it was broken. I believe she may even have been disposing of evidence as she went to the dump allegedly.
Realising her body didn't sink or float away she was removed from the water pissible using the lead which caused bruising to her upper arms as they dragged her out. She is not dead but unconscious.
She was dragged over the stile causing bruising to her back and part of the stile to break. So one if not two men did this. In the process one of her boots was lost in the river.
The bruising to her back was possibly caused in dragging her through the hidden field to the other side entrance to the farm by the tow path. She was taken to the farm where she came around, screamed again near allotment lane and her head was forced into a muddy pool by someone stepling on her back and the back of her thigh. (Only 20ml water in stomach which can take 7 pints and lungs which can take 4 pints) and possibly hit with a large square object causing a broken eye socket and bridge of nose and killed.
The motive being money and property and assets.
I think this started out as a GFM for money to pay a debt. Possibly a drug debt given the connection to the drug world.
I think Nicola fought back and thus lost her life.
Ron knows
His wife knows
Penny knows
Her Grandsons know
Anne Marie Knows
Her spouse knows
Paul knows
They are all members of the same family. Nicola and Paul have rented an office on the camp site. Ron claimed not to know them but in the same Sky interview where he almost said Paul in his pretence not to know him he then states angrily 'Then Paul Arrived'. As if Paul were some sort of nusiance. Rubbish. Ron also claimed he found the phone but he never mentions a tied up dog. Why would Penny tie the dog up and not take Willow and the phone with her. Clearly the dog was an issue. Clearly this is what started the argument. Clearly this is why Penny called the police at 09.30am.
Clearly this is why she never came to coroner's. Clearly tbis is why cctv is missing as grandson said it was working.
The sister suspects. The parents suspect.
Emma may know or may want to wash her hands of it as that is her body language.
And if none of this is true then Nicola is elsewhere and this has all been a bad film choreographed for money. Or Nicola is in protective custody. But somehow i think they acted upon something for a monetary motive.
Maybe Nicola was digging too much into the death of the engineer attached to Paul's company who was also found dead in the same river. She found impirtabt info the night before but didnt know how she was goung tondeal with it.
Paul makes an odd comment in the end of the documentary when he says he sees Nicola in the girls and then he says that makes it all worthwhile. He also couldnt say her name and reiterated 'my girls'. He may not have pulled the trigger but he is involved.
What exactly did he mean by seeing Nicola in her children made it all worthwhile. Thats as odd as 'its like a dream!' Mmh.
What really goes on at that Camp Site. A lady who can't stand other people's dogs off leads has now got every tracker dog in the country watching her.
Penny Fletcher was key, remember Penny had threatened to shoot loose dogs with her gun, why was she granted a gun licence ? And there had been an altercation between Nichola and Penny regarding Willow not always being on her lead. Hmm
Penny and her family were sketchy and threatening. Penny get your gun should be checked for dementia and her gun confiscated. I too had wondered if Nichola was In Protection. I did wonder re Lawson too.
@@Anita-gp1gv I wonder if the Investigating officer Lawson is related to the friend of Paul called Andy Lawson who helped set up the GFM.
How do you die of natural causes at 50 years old?
so where is this lead ...where did it go. was it 'used' leads do not dissapear. was there a tag. with names or vets name.
@@len6871 There was likely a collar. WE haven't had dog tag confirmed. But a vet would read the chip in a dog. Silly to leave a dog and phone for almost 2 hours without doing anything with either.
The lawyers probably would have been contacted by the tv company first, so that everything would have gone alright.
Im gona be honest i have looked at Peters pictures and i dont see anything but im also not a professional in this so i cant tell. But i have to say this all of this is so shady i never trusted Paul i remember the interview he did and Willow didnt wanted to be near him she went to the host instead. Also Willow is a Springer Spaniel and she wasnt even wet and that is really strange because they are so attached to their owner. Also if i have been through a hugh trauma i would not play a role like Paul in a documentary he seems like he is some kind of star now i dont trust him at all
I Noticed that as well. Think Willow was Nocola's dog.
Why did Paul change his timeline when we know school could not have called him at 10.30am.
A few people have mentioned that now, well spotted
the partner has probably been able to pay off his debts that had been accumalated previous to this sad case........i guess because the go fund me was shut down earlier on in this has now been compensated.....set up by nicola s friend soon after she went missing.........check the slagging off social media by the partner................something is off here.....
Even ex top police guy acknowledged that police had Missed the Golden Hour. He too had his doubts and decried the state of present day policing .
That's a great question - what are they getting out of doing the documentary?
Nicola was a missing person who has now been found. It was very sad but it's not like they need to re-enact it in order to find her or an attacker. It would make more sense if someone like the MCcans took part in a re- enactment but they don't.
Panicking that the public still think her death was suspicious! So the narrative has to pushed again. That's my feeling!
a large part of that programme was given over to social media, some of it condescending, some of it outright slamming it.
Well said
Peter doesn't deserve all the s**t he's had thrown at him, i think hes a decent genuine guy and he just really wanted to help the family, i think they came across as ungrateful on the documentary not one of them had anything positive to say about him, its so unfair 😔
Why did t they show the whole cctv footage in the beginning but the houses were missing then they were showing
Cause I watched it
What do the police have to gain in not investigating this properly? Why was it in their interest not to find the body when Peter identified it? Why are they reporting Willow running between the seat and the river if she was running between the seat and the gate? I have worked for a police service and in various government roles and we may not have liked it when someone pointed out our mistakes or oversights but it didn't stop us acting responsibly. Peter iniatially trusted the Police because he was use to being able to trust them, what was different here and why?
Why did Paul change his timeline when we know school could not have called him at 10.30am.
Becky Smith could have got LP to remove Nicola and use Rothwell to find her on set date.
Rothwell - arrested by Becky in 2016
Arrested with another chap called Ansell
Paul looking over wall near location of find night before at 10.30pm.
Is this all for real.
All polie have succeeded in doing is raise peoples suspicions higher .
It's like the twilight zone
@@kevinkenny6975 cue the music... Then the credits...
Look into the history between Paul Ansells brother and Rebecca Smith.
Goes all the way back to Essex some years ago.
Very interesting comment
I pray that Nicola will get her day and justice will prevail 🙏🏻🥰❤️
Hi Luke, You mused that NB looked angry when she marched to the car in the cctv clip. I have seen a video by Danbers Ecitsuj where you hear one of the girls coming through the gate, saying “why do you row”. This would explain why the whole clip was not released too!
See “Nicola Bulley The New ‘Old’ CCTV”. The child’s words are right at the beginning of this video.
Yeah it’s just a suspicion from me…seems it may hold more merit to it now
I had heard it said about the dog going between the bench & the river at the time. RUclipsr Michelle Walks mentions it. I believe Peter faulding did find her, I don’t understand what happened with the police not finding her then. Maybe a matter of their arrogance, being reluctant to accept outside assistance, incompetence or miscommunication? It seems there are no independent sonar experts in the U.K. to interpret the images / data currently. I hope in time this all comes out.
I thought lc sent nikki text on Thursday night and she didn't reply but in the documentary they said it was the Friday morning. I'm not sure?
The timelines do not co-inside with Paul's previous channel 5 interview, weird totally weird !!
Very weird init
That's very very interesting about the 21 yr old being followed by someone dressed all in black with a black beanie hat aswell. Wow!!
Justice for Nicola .