I have to examine my downs sister because she lied about me to the state. I’m sick to my stomach. I just need to ask two simple questions and she won’t lie. But I want to also prove her parental alienation symptoms and they incredible emotional abuse her agency inflicted as well as her care provider. Deeeeep breaths! God be with us. I want my sister back ❤️
At 0:22 you said "about the accident" that implies that her children's death was a accident therefor the person should not be ruled in any punishments because, it was just an accident
It’s leading if there has not yet been mention of a park, as it suggests a fact that hasn’t been raised by the witness. If the witness has already referred to a park then it can form part of a looping question.
@@loveiseternity I don't know if that is the case, the question can be answered yes I went with them to the park, or no I didn't go with them to the park. "You went with them to the park?" is a leading question, but can be a looping question, or even a background question of immaterial or stipulated to facts.
@@PapaArkansas870 Someone telling you happened is only present sense impression if they were saying what happened when they were perceiving it (e.g. talking to a 911 operator while you witness a robbery or someone leaving a house).
@@PapaArkansas870 so here, where the mother of the kids involved in the event is being asked did anyone tell you what happened (after the event occurred) there is no present sense impression hearsay exception. My objection would be sustained.
Sean Waddell thats what i was thinking, because she’s wasting time of the court. And I don’t personally think my opposing council or judge would like that.
Question : where did you lived ? Answer : It not the best neighbourhood, we don’t really had that much but the family was priceless we had each other. If the Question would be by Juan Martinez : And where did you lived ? Answer : It not the best neighbourhood, we don’t really had that much but the family was priceless we had each other. JM : Did I ask you how much that you had ? Or if your family was priceless? I asked you where did you lived !! Do you understand that? 😂 😂
great video. I am a practicing lawyer from Australia, this was great to see!
xdedededed u n saludo a la grasa
I enjoy the professor's feedback very much, thank you.
I have to examine my downs sister because she lied about me to the state. I’m sick to my stomach. I just need to ask two simple questions and she won’t lie. But I want to also prove her parental alienation symptoms and they incredible emotional abuse her agency inflicted as well as her care provider. Deeeeep breaths! God be with us. I want my sister back ❤️
Thank you so much for sharing this video!
Great Video im Studying Law here in the Philippines...
woah man that lady is good! Thanks this will help me ALLOT!
um is this real
Thanks for the example. Lots of help
Ms. Wilson is a good actress. She could be in movies. I hope she uses her powers for good.
Thanks. :)
xd wtf xd
if there are no jury who do I ask her to introduce herself to
thank you
Bring puppets
The court
the judge or the court
In Australia, a question that asks the witness why they’re here today might be seen as self-serving and therefore not a permissible question.
in the US it not only establishes capacity, but is allowable to set the table for the Jury. Obviously direct is pro witness (self serving).
At 0:22 you said "about the accident" that implies that her children's death was a accident therefor the person should not be ruled in any punishments because, it was just an accident
Good point.However, at any point it was MURDER because Rebacca Heartwill killed the woman's two sons.
Calling something an "accident" isn't the same as calling it faultless. Accidents are a result of negligence.
Can an attorney refer to notes for questions or so jurors loose patience with that ?
when subes tus momos en formado digital ( me cago en la pta)
"Did you go with them to the park?" 2:22
Is that a leading question?
+Erika Wilson I love your voice its so soothing😜😍
It’s leading if there has not yet been mention of a park, as it suggests a fact that hasn’t been raised by the witness. If the witness has already referred to a park then it can form part of a looping question.
No
Emma Morris That’s a different Erika buddy
@@loveiseternity I don't know if that is the case, the question can be answered yes I went with them to the park, or no I didn't go with them to the park. "You went with them to the park?" is a leading question, but can be a looping question, or even a background question of immaterial or stipulated to facts.
great piece
Why are these videos age restricted?
Great Help! Thank you very much.
Did anyone tell you what happened? Objection hearsay
Scott Bernstein Fair enough, easy way to erase her statement about the car lol
Might be present sense impression.
@@PapaArkansas870 Someone telling you happened is only present sense impression if they were saying what happened when they were perceiving it (e.g. talking to a 911 operator while you witness a robbery or someone leaving a house).
@@Scott-gt4xb Yes. So it would be admissible only if its established that the declarant perceived the event contemporaneously therewith.
@@PapaArkansas870 so here, where the mother of the kids involved in the event is being asked did anyone tell you what happened (after the event occurred) there is no present sense impression hearsay exception. My objection would be sustained.
A wonderful cross examination every law/bar student must hear.
Isn't it a direct examination?
You are right.
Thanks
I’m from Mrs.Abuzharia’s class
Same, but are you allowed to write that?
is she on prosecution?
Safa yes
so good
Did Ms. xxxx ever apologize to you?
is it not an objectionable question? leading? thanks!
Rafael Allan it’s not leading because the witness already raised the issue of her apologising.
Isn’t the witnesses answer to the question: where do you live? An objection on the grounds of non-responsive answer....???????
Ya, it is non responsive, but who is going to object to that?
You always object the question asked by the attorney
Yeah, but also the entire line of questioning could be objected to on relevance and possible on prejudicing the jury against the defendant.
Sean Waddell thats what i was thinking, because she’s wasting time of the court. And I don’t personally think my opposing council or judge would like that.
Medha Srinath ummm, I don’t think so, you can also object witnesses as well. And it really helps if you know how to play with it.
Great
Good
Question : where did you lived ?
Answer : It not the best neighbourhood, we don’t really had that much but the family was priceless we had each other.
If the Question would be by Juan Martinez : And where did you lived ?
Answer : It not the best neighbourhood, we don’t really had that much but the family was priceless we had each other.
JM : Did I ask you how much that you had ? Or if your family was priceless?
I asked you where did you lived !!
Do you understand that? 😂 😂
I had six kids. After the accident I have 5. WFT?
Same
Where were you when the children were killed?