The simplest answer imo is they didn’t build it, they occupied the space later and claimed to be the builders, and try to imitate they did, but failed. Even wrote their names in everything claiming it, but even the carving processes were different - there are barbaric carvings over pristine reliefs as well.
I’ve been to the pyramids at Giza. It truly doesn’t hit you until you are physically standing right in front of them. Pictures and videos do it no Justice.
Wish more people could make the money and have a trip to Giza and other places. It is a goal of mine before air travel declines too much and we become further enslaved and locked down perpetually by the NWO.
@@bfboobie hey if you can find a way to save up and go, you should definitely do it. If you know anyone from there, see if you can go together because Cairo and the surrounding Giza can be a bit chaotic and a few other things. I will admit that my wife and I are blessed as my stepmother booked the trip for as a wedding gift. Also, my brother accompanied us and him having lived there with my father, my other brother and stepmother, while also being fluent in Arabic, helped tremendously. Look up some people’s trips to Egypt and you’ll easily see why having my brother there was invaluable. As for the impressiveness of the structures themselves, we had Flown from Dubai where my father and his family live, and we hade checked out the burj khlifa which is the tallest building in the world, I believe. With comparison and the burj khlifa being that tall, there was something so much more different, awesome, intriguing, and awe inspiring about standing in front and at the bottom of the great pyramid and the sphinx as well.
@@joeygio5015 cool man thanks for the advice. So cool you had nice opportunity to travel and explore. I won't die without seeing Egypt! I hear a lot of people saying you can't appreciate the awesomeness of the Great Pyramid until you see it in person. I believe it!
Mini minuteman lacks several times as well he was unable to answer truth completely of gunyan Padang and Bolivian pyramid, He tries to suppose things as well while calls others pseudoscience and do not believe in there research he knows nothing about astronomy and astronomical orders he calls himself archeologist we no evidence of it and itself refrain from calling himself an archeologist in someone else’s show.
@@rct999 lol who else would I be referring to? Hamhock is a fraud who never presents hard evidence, just speculation. His whole approach is basically 'everyone else is wrong, therefore I'm right.' None of his work is peer reviewed, and his only qualification is a degree in sociology. He's a journalist. If I want to learn how to write a magazine article, I'll listen to him. As for archeology, I'll listen to those who have expertise in that field. All he ever does is ask questions, which is just another way of saying 'I can't be bothered to produce evidence so you must produce it for me'. That's not science. He's a grifter and Rogan is his hype man/shill. And all the while hamhocks cult zombies are making him rich.
@@YouSmokeChed nope. It was made illegal to climb the GP in 1951. Hancock was born in 1950. Unless he climbed it at less than a year old, he's lying and therefore factually wrong.
That’s so ironic considering graham repeatedly gets his facts wrong and deliberately lies about the magnitude of things he’s talking about and has admitted that he’s a pseudoscientists
@Bill Hawkins he's not wrong. Graham's theory's have been heavily debunked. His starting point is fine, it's the facts he leaves out to avoid contradicting himself that's the problem. If he looked at the full picture then it's clear he says the shit he says because it's easy to sell because it is very interesting
@@jakesaunders8955 he goes on rants about how the accepted facts by scholars are lies and they will tell you graham is wrong and how you shouldn’t trust them (the educated scholars who know what they’re talking about) but you should trust him (the uneducated pseudoscientists) because he goes against the mainstream facts which, for some reason, make him more credible or at least more reliable. After setting up this manipulative way of garnering unearned audience trust he will then make some extraordinary claims (extraordinary as in, he makes the feats seem completely impossible if the mainstream consensus and scholars were right thus creating this audience assumption that the scholars must be wrong then) with false supporting evidence (such as incorrect measurements, false dilemmas etc etc) which the audience is now influenced to assume the benefit of the doubt that it could be true as the only reason it sounds extraordinary is because mainstream facts say so and thusly since he had made us think the mainstream facts can’t be trusted his ridiculous claims no longer look ridiculous and instead plausible. He’s essentially trying to brainwash his audience into being more accepting of bullshit by convincing them to ignore any of the proven or even logical explanations that contradict his claims. It’s extremely dishonest and irresponsible for someone whose established a false authority as an archeologist (which he isn’t, he is not an archeologist and has no education in that field).
Doesnt mean anything when it comes from someone like him. Thats like raspucia on the corner with her 4 inch nails calling me ignorant. i dont value your opinion if it has no value
Am English, can confirm. “Oh dear” is pretty much reserved for the worst of the worst. For example: You spill your cup of tea: “This is the worse thing that has ever fucking happened in the history of Man.” The Russians launch a pre-emptive nuclear strike: “ Oh dear.”
I highly encourage any Hancock fanboys to spend some time watching Miniminuteman’s RUclips series where he analyses his Ancient Apocalypse Netflix show - genuinely fascinating and super informative!
And I highly encourage any Miniminuteman fanboys to spend some time watching DeDunking's videos on his work, particularly his critiques of Ancient Apocalypse. He is friends with both Miniminuteman and Graham Hancock, yet criticises and analyzes both with great skill and knowledge.
That ‘Oh, dear’ from Graham translates to ‘What the fuck are you arguing with me for…when you’ve never even seen the very things you’re trying to convince me were constructed by unskilled slave labor!’ 🙏🏼Thanks for likes
@TJ ha.. it certainly was. They do not pay attention to such details. However, 30 years ago may have been too soon to step out of the mindless explanations of impossible feats. Much more has been uncovered since then, and every time only points further away from the established story. Does that bother you? You should be open to investigating these places more. Real science. Maybe you can join one time on a tour, if you have not been to Giza, you should, see for yourself.
Its a simple explanation. It was a decline in the willingness to create such grand structures and a shift in priorities. Changes in politics and religion and economics can all have an impact. It doesn't mean they no longer knew how to build them. There were other reasons. In the 20th century there was a country that built such crazy rockets that they sent people to the moon. Now they dont. But in that country private enterprise is building them. Do you think there was a market for pyramids in ancient Egypt? No. They were built because the pharaohs wanted them. If there is no demand, then the craft starts to die.
@@ZxZoZEDIT: I’m not sure why this comment keeps getting misinterpreted I thought it was fairly clear. I’m saying I believe advanced society’s existed that are lost to history not aliens or extra dimensional but indeed human. why do people automatically want to discredit human ability? Humans are amazing and can accomplish anything we desire, given enough time. People need to give us humans more credit instead of automatically assuming aliens did it just because modern humans don’t yet understand something
We are aliens. The people that built the pyramid where our ancestors. We don't recognize ourselves. Because of de evolution. We belong amongst the stars and Light. Look within yourself and everything about ourselves will reveal itself to you.
@@thechiefwildhorse4651 You should look up the definition of indigenous and take your racist illogical rant elsewhere. Your pride is far beyond you. Humble yourself before the Lord God. Your jealous hatred only creates further division.
No one was debating here though and this is all information that gets put down because institutions don’t do the research into this type of stuff so they claim it isn’t true all while they stick to their theories which make zero sense
When ALL of handcocks piers do not agree with this. What I can't understand is why anyone even believes him. Makes no sense. Its comparable to someone watching a video of someone explain they don't understand basic physics and coming to the conclusion the earth was flat. And absolutely not aliens, what people forget in regards to traversing the cosmos at speeds capable of reasonably getting there in a reasonable time forget time dilation. Not aliens. Could of log rolled a very long way with the amount of slaves. I would bet there's a simple solution to the problem of shifting the bricks the distance they were shifted. Doesn't have to be fantastical
@@sash328 have u ever been to watch a sports game live before? If you haven’t then you have no right to talk about the game. You don’t know anything about that game…
@@TacoTomtheBomb I’ve been to see the pyramids of Giza. Many archaeologists haven’t. Therefore I know more about the pyramids of Giza than those archaeologists.
@@casualviewing1096Hancock isn’t. He is part of the unfortunate group of people who see through the flaws of modern consensus. As a geologist, I unfortunately have lost a lot of faith in my sciences consensus as the more arrogant or self righteous of my compatriots will in alignment of the archaeological sciences call myself and others conspirators in some greater game. It’s of course lies. Technology progresses forward, not backward. The erosive patterns in the sphinx enclosure do not lie. Whatever the conjecture, whatever the theory, what remains geologically concrete in my eye, is the theory that the sphinx comes before the oldest of old kingdom sites. This I think, based on the data, is truism of ancient Egypt.
@@Sworn2TheDark Hancock is a joke he uses long words and numbers to sound smart and thinks that interpretation is evidence. He also thinks that because he’s been somewhere that his word on it is the undeniable truth. He’s a misleading fraud who wants revenge because archeology rejects and honestly laughs at him.
Discoveries were, and are still being made by open minded people with questions. Were learning the Earth is older and far more interesting than they have made us believe, and it seems they want to keep it that way. We need people like Graham 🙏 Thank you sir.
Try learning to spell his name before offering a critique. Secondly the entire scholarly community agrees with him whereas no one believes GH laughable nonsense.
@@drstevej2527 I have long since have learned that the scientific community is full of sh*t. For example, evolution has been disproven long ago. The whole thing runs contrary to the second law of thermodynamics, and the first law of thermodynamics can only overcome the first law with intelligently controlled input of energy, throwing random energy at things only furthers the breakdown of order. Also there isn't enough time for evolution to take place, there are parameters that dictate this. The spin rate of the earth slows down over time, which means if we go back in time the earth spins faster. Going back ten or twenty thousand years would make very little difference, however hundreds of millions of years, to say nothing of billions of years is a much different matter. At hundreds of millions of years in the past the earth would be spinning so fast that it would be severely bulged at the equator, and at billions of years it would fly apart. The earth's surface erodes do to wind and rain and snow. From the supposed time of the dinosaurs, hundreds of millions of years ago, it would have been eroded flat as a billiard table, with a even layer of water over it a half dozen times over. But subduction resolves this problem right? Well that would mean dinosaurs were tough indeed, for their bones to have survived that. The sun shrinks over time, and if we go back hundreds of millions of years or billions of years the earth would be a cinder. There are various other parameters as well, not sure exactly how old the earth is, but it sure as h*ll isn't hundreds of millions or billions of years old. Now we get to the churning primordial soup with lightning flashing around producing amino acids. A little problem is that a DNA strand is billions of molecules long and is composed of ONLY left handed molecules, so how do you isolate only left handed molecules in this churning primordial soup? That's easy, you can't. And even if I allow for a miracle to accomplish this, then what do you have? A DNA strand floating around in this churning primordial soup isn't going to do anything other than deteriorate. To even theoretically have life you need to be able to reproduce which isn't going to happen unless you have the entire rest of the cell, which is more complex that the most complicated factory on earth. All of this coming together with at the same time and same place, all in working order to even theoretically have life, isn't going to happen no matter how many years you have, I think your going to need another miracle to even advance to the next impossibility. Well I suppose the answer is panspermia right? If we remove the problem light years away and sweep it under the rug then the problem is solved. We'll we supposedly found evidence of life on meteorites landing on earth. I've seen the evidence and it's weak as h*ll, and even if I allow this argument all it proves is that there is biological material floating around in space, not that evolution has taken place somewhere else. Graham Hancock is much more on target based on the facts than conventional Egyptologist and Shermer is what I said he is.
@@tomatojizzz yeah but it didn’t happen to burn everything down. It was actually an order from the Roman emperor to burn down the library a couple centuries later because of the rising tension between a pagans and Christians. Long story short the emperor was Christian then the pagans started fighting the Christians then the pagans ran to the library to hide then awhile later the emperor was like “the pagans are free to go but burn that anti-god building” or some bullshit like that. Look up “history buffs agora” if u want more info
@@stephenfanthorpe2708 surely there wouldn't have been knowledge of any sort of ancient civ recordered there cos the Egyptians at the time didn't know about any lost civ
Tones and vibrations..... ALL SOUND IS VIBRATIONS!! ffs the level of ignorance about this in these comment sections is shocking proof of just how many people skip school days.
Burying water under sand using a digerido to make the sand move reducing the half-life or temperature cooling depth because it's moving it could freeze it easier making it possible to use the ice to basically bench press the stone lifting it up.
Was he wrong tho? Go ahead and compare the Giza stats to the pyramids that came after. It's literally no contest, not even close. And the ones at Giza, despite being older, are in MUCH better condition. They have withstood the test of time in damn near perfect condition. The others are crumbling to piles of rubble.
He was not wrong, I just do not like the way these facts are being used. They are realy cool, but instead of being like: these are some cool facts about pyramids, it is more often used as 'evidence' for Atlantis.
How is it possible that the architecture got worse over time? Declining economy? Shift in political power? External or internal needs that required more immediate attention? A population shift? ...weed? To stoned to move actual stone? (Today's 4/20...could be...) We may never know, and we could be wrong about everything we _think_ we know now. What we _should_ know, however, is that if we stop asking these questions we never will know. And that is the worst intellectual crime any one person or society can make. Which is why Hancock's work is so valuable and should be cherished regardless of any ultimate answers that may come. Asking questions is the most vital step in obtaining wisdom.
Architecture has not gotten worse, we just don't have a reason to build a pyramid that would cost multi-billions like the Egyptians did. Also, I highly encourage you to watch miniminutemans debunking of graham Hancock he makes good points that graham is not right on many things.
@@saddocatto2784 I'm a big fan of la Belle Epoque, personally. Hancock plays a very interesting role in the sciences. It's not anything new, but his role is absolutely indispensable and often overlooked or outright dismissed. Much to the detriment of the intellectual pursuits. He connects the dots, speculates, and asks questions based on what he's observed from a variety of otherwise segregated disciplines. And this is a crucial step in nudging, but at times driving, the direction of some of those same disciplines. Think Jules Verne, Wells, Newton, Einstein. All of them latteral thinkers speculating on absurd notions...only to be shown as visionaries after they were initially laughed at. I just mentioned a few, but that list could go on and on. There's also a truism that is almost always overlooked, if it's even taught anymore, that often debunks those who would debunk. So whenever you see a debunking going on, on most topics anywhere you look, you will often see this mistake played out on a grand scale. The truism says, "absence of evidence, _is not_ evidence of absence.". So whenever you hear, "X didn't happen, because there's no evidence of X". Then there's your evidence of a very weak position, not to be taken too seriously. One thing that is always overlooked, which tells me that many of Hancock's critic's don't actually _read_ his material, is that he'll often go into great detail and note the arguments against his positions _in his own books_ . Which I find inordinately honest and refreshing, not to mention rare.
@@ravenslaves have you watched miniminutemans video series debunking graham hancock, Milo watched his entire netflix show and went through it episode by episode? I would not consider Hancock on the level of a great thinker, as many of his claims about ancient civilizations, aliens, or artifacts have very little backing. However, I do think many scientists are not good at communicating and teaching the younger generations, and this causes people to be miseducated or not ask questions of why and how things work in the world.
Look at St Peters Basilica in Rome Why aren't all churches as grand as that Why has there been a dramatic decline in the ability of Christians to build churches
@@GrapheneOxideIsInCVVax Imagine identifying with a conspiracy theory so badly that you tell others to kill themselves. Tell me you're susceptible for bullshit without telling me. Damn you people are insufferable.
@@justcarterr To end up with a heavy metal laden brain like yours? No thanks sir cucksalot. FYI, your comment shows how washed your brain is considering the whole tinfoil thing is propaganda to make you not realize how close to reality it actually has many use cases especially in the deflection of EMF. I wouldn't expect someone of your caliber to know that though, or anything for that matter.
Calling someone an Atheist because they state an opinion that has grounded origins. How is that fair? I mean Graham Hancock is a pseudo scientist or archaeologist I can’t remember. One of his one quotes proves it “I am no more a pseudo *insert whichever it is* than a dolphin is a pseudo-fish”. Come on now.
This is the problem today, any lunatic with no proof can become famous and rich but repeatedly saying lies and brings no proof to the table. This guy should just be cancelled unless he proves anything... which he will never manage to.
@Bingobanana4789 😂 bruh he just now told you the facts of the pyramid go back to school and study history this time. Instead of sleeping in playin video games and eating snack packs all day kid.
@@sukmynut I wasn’t referring to Hancock, I was referring to the guy who made the comment. See how I replied to the person who replied to the person making the comment. Seems your a bit of a retard and can’t read. Perhaps it’s you who needs to go back to school, I hear there is a spot at the Derek zoolander school for kids that can’t read right or do things good just for you.
Nah. He didn't. Flint decided to focus the arguments he is an expert (seeds/nutrition patterns) but throw under the rug the geologic questioning. Typical gatekeeping in academia.
@@drakkheinI was a huge believer in Graham’s stuff but that debate was a clear win for Dibble. Hancock just kept reverting back to “you can’t prove it DIDN’T exist” while being unable to provide a shred of evidence that a civilization DID in fact exist. He’s right that the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence but at the same time there needs to be at least some sort of indication that an advanced civilization existed beyond things like “these underwater rocks look too weird to be natural.”
@@royalgoose7646 , I'm a GH fan and IMO everyone lost in this debate, make no mistake. 1. GH failed to actually make his point by bringing more hard core, factual arguments. However a. These were the very people who actually called him a charlatan. b. Flint clearly associated him with racists and bigotry. It's hard to keep calm in this situation. 2. I don't think it was a clear win for Flint. Flint only decided to debate with his expertise and ignore other arguments (I'm in academia and that's a common trick) he kept saying "I'm not a Geologist, I can't debate on this". Well, if you want to understand the phenomena at its totality you don't get to pick the argument you want to debate, that introduces bias. I don't mind not existing an ancient civilization. But GH brings a hypothesis and the way Flint portrays himself only brings bad rep for us scientists.
@@drakkheinIf you were actually a scientist then you would understand why Dibble doesn't debate outside of his field. It's not a trick, it's being mature enough to admit you don't know everything and cannot debate on every subject under the sun. It's like asking a plumber to weigh in on what the electrician is doing.
I think it's Graham Hancock on the Joe Rogan Experience. I think he's been on his podcast a few times. Interesting fella. Edit. But he's not really debating him lol. Just conversing.
This is from JRE #961. It wasn't an established "debate", but they certainly disagreed about several things. Subscribe if you want to see some more cool clips I edit from this one!
@user-ep4ln7hs6hCorrect, this guy (Michael Shermer) is not an Egyptologist. He’s a mainstream scientist who runs Skeptic Magazine, a science publication. Being a part of the mainstream, he often feels the need to defend mainstream points of view that he has no knowledge or expertise in. Makes for some great content 😂
And apparently don’t argue with him especially if you’re an archaeologist, historian, etc. because he’ll just cry that you’re singling him out for speaking “the truth”.
This isn’t even arguing. He’s just talking over the guy and spitting out random semi-related points in the hope that you won’t stop to pick them apart.
It still surprises me, why the hell Graham is still speaking... What surprises me even more, is why the hell there are people listening to him, and believing him...
It was here before the Egyptians and they found it and took credit for it and tried to rebuild and couldn’t that’s why they couldn’t build anything else like it
@@TheKaneECO “Fall for the scam, you can’t talk on the scammer without falling for his scam.” He’s an author dude, his only goal is to sell you books, I’ve read enough to understand he’s great at writing but he will never be a good researcher. You can’t use things that are known not to be any kind of evidence, any of the old maps or the beach rock at Bimini for example, despite neither actually supporting his claim he will just lie or omit details in order to sound more believable. Read a book by an actual scientist, start with a book on what beach rock is, then you’ll see he purposely leaves out details or actively doesn’t research what he’s arguing against.
@@Bascillion you realize most of the things in his books ARE sourced by actual scientists? More evidence that you’ve not read his books since all of his sources are marked. I don’t think that 100% of his ideas are true. But the overall message that human civilization is far older and was far more advanced than we initially assumed seems very hard to argue against. From the work that Randal has done and the information that Graham has reported on there is no doubt in my mind that we don’t have the full picture. Bringing such things into the open is such a major victory for Graham and all the researchers he represents. I don’t think he’s some holy prophet, but his work deserves some level of respect. Denying this is plain ignorant.
@@TheKaneECOYou can twist facts to make anything seem true if you're clever enough. I can say that Alexander the Great was the best conqueror of all time, and present all of his triumphs, but do the triumphs of ATG alone really make him that great? What about the counter arguments that Persia was in decline after its recent loss to the Greeks a century earlier? What about his failure to invade India? What about how his empire collapsed upon his death? What about other people who were great conquerors like Genghis Khan, Charlemagne, or Justinian? Intentional omission is still a form of lying, and GH has been called out on it multiple times by the researchers he cites. The truth of the matter is that humanity is at its peak right now, and while the Bronze Age Collapse and the Fall of Rome were certainly Dark Ages, technological progress actually accelerated during those periods, with Iron Working and Chemistry dramatically speeding up in both instances. Greece went from a single powerful confederation led by Mycenae to a collection of rivaling city states that, while weaker individually, managed to collectively hold off Persia, an Empire Mycenae would've had no hope against. Rome likewise would've had no chance against the Ummayads and Mongols, but the kingdoms it birthed held off both, and eventually spread across the entire world.
You have to argue with him. He doesn't know what he is doing. None of his work is peer reviewed. He is not an Archaeologist. I think he has great passion in his work and he written a bunch of books but they amount to his work vs the rest of the scientific and archaeology body of specialist that are published and peer reviewed. Most, if not all of them disagree with many of his thoughts and theories.
Milo Rossi actually argued with Graham Hancock outstandingly well. You should check out miniminutemans series on ancient apocalypse if you like challenging your own beliefs.
Miniminuteman has admitted to never having been to a dig, or barely any of these historical sites… he actually admits he can’t call himself an archaeologist. Meanwhile Hancock has been all over the world speaking first hand to archaeologists and local historians
Joe fucking Rogan is faaaaar from a professor. I applaud him for trying to poke the bear and see if it will open its eyes but hes not the right guy to do this. Consider watching or listening to archeologists theres quite a few who put their works onto the web these days.
@@mnomadvfx So basically you don't know who the guy is and are just talking. The man, Graham Hancock, has decades of experience while you are practicing getting fat and hold zero educational background. Your move, loser.
What happened is that knowledge got lost and whoever were the people who held that knowledge, died along with it. How they came to acquire it is an even bigger mystery that Graham is searching for to discover
Except you don't develop that knowledge overnight, nor is it only on say, a few tablets that can be easily lost or broken for a project this massive and civilization defining. Educated builders and even the laymen, both of which must've been numbered thousands or tens of thousands, would know all of this and pass it on if given the chance.
@@jakegray1723 no that isn’t the case. If it were how things were made that way, it would have been known for ages. It is literally lost knowledge. Of course it’s a complex way of technology that really most likely its evidence is completely wiped off the face of the Earth and we can only scrounge up how it was intricately made to speculate how they did it
@C. Galindo It was known for ages, before and during their no-doubt, very long construction time(s). That said, the rest of your statement I agree with.
He certainly says things in an intelligent way. That doesn’t mean that he’s not saying utter bs without any real factual, scientific basis or any professional evidence
Don’t argue with graham hancock?….graham Hancock chooses to argue with people with no knowledge of what he’s talking about and that’s why he wins here. When he talks with archaeologists, he loses terribly and has pretty hurt feelings about it. I don’t choose to run foot races against children in order to feel better about myself and neither should graham hancock.
@@daveybigtechsno1fangurl518his point is debunked very quickly and unceremoniously, the reason people believe him is because he’s a master manipulator, he sets you up and then knocks you down, watch the mini minuteman videos on it, they’re very informative
@@daveybigtechsno1fangurl518 He cannot answer any arguments, his main line of argumentation is "YOU DON'T KNOW THAT THERE WASN'T A SUPERCIVILISATION 12 THOUSAND YEARS AGO"
Hes making a legitimate point that you dont understand his point until you see it in person. Ill give grahm credit, he has gotten out and studied everything for himself and not just whats portrayed to us in books (some by people who have never even seen it)
How is it possible that Ancient Egyptian architecture got WORSE over time?
More like we lost ancient tech in the last flood
Mass Immigration.
Money basically- lack of resource. Easily explained
The simplest answer imo is they didn’t build it, they occupied the space later and claimed to be the builders, and try to imitate they did, but failed.
Even wrote their names in everything claiming it, but even the carving processes were different - there are barbaric carvings over pristine reliefs as well.
Define 'worse'? Are skyscrapers 'worse' architecture than a pile of rocks?
“Oh dear” 💀
Translation: “hold my beer I’m Boutta end this mans whole career”
Says it all!
Nerd fight! Hancock with the KO
When someone is trying to get a word in but getting smashed hard in the face with the true hard cold facts as one cannot debate with the evidence! 😢
Lol
I’ve been to the pyramids at Giza. It truly doesn’t hit you until you are physically standing right in front of them. Pictures and videos do it no Justice.
Wish more people could make the money and have a trip to Giza and other places. It is a goal of mine before air travel declines too much and we become further enslaved and locked down perpetually by the NWO.
@@bfboobie hey if you can find a way to save up and go, you should definitely do it. If you know anyone from there, see if you can go together because Cairo and the surrounding Giza can be a bit chaotic and a few other things. I will admit that my wife and I are blessed as my stepmother booked the trip for as a wedding gift. Also, my brother accompanied us and him having lived there with my father, my other brother and stepmother, while also being fluent in Arabic, helped tremendously. Look up some people’s trips to Egypt and you’ll easily see why having my brother there was invaluable. As for the impressiveness of the structures themselves, we had Flown from Dubai where my father and his family live, and we hade checked out the burj khlifa which is the tallest building in the world, I believe. With comparison and the burj khlifa being that tall, there was something so much more different, awesome, intriguing, and awe inspiring about standing in front and at the bottom of the great pyramid and the sphinx as well.
@@joeygio5015 cool man thanks for the advice. So cool you had nice opportunity to travel and explore. I won't die without seeing Egypt! I hear a lot of people saying you can't appreciate the awesomeness of the Great Pyramid until you see it in person. I believe it!
@@bfboobie I hope you get to go there too my brother, it's a life goal/dream of mine also
That's how I felt standing in front of the Chichen Itza pyramid.. mind-blowing
Well everyone a gangsta till miniminuteman intervened
another archaeologist programmed by mainstream media 🥱 nun new
Yes. Just yes
fax
Mini minuteman lacks several times as well he was unable to answer truth completely of gunyan Padang and Bolivian pyramid, He tries to suppose things as well while calls others pseudoscience and do not believe in there research he knows nothing about astronomy and astronomical orders he calls himself archeologist we no evidence of it and itself refrain from calling himself an archeologist in someone else’s show.
@@TheGreedyGamer pretty sure he already explained about the gunung padang and bolivia pyramid
It's called background music, & that's where it belongs. Not in the foreground!!!!!!!!!
G. Hancock: "Oh Dear."
Translation: "You have chosen to fuck around and now must find out."
😂😂
Graham is an arrogant amateur archeologist who wants the most interesting theory to be true regardless of evidence
@@fredburns6846 you sound salty. 🤣🤣
@@fredburns6846 He's a professional journalist who has researched for 40 odd years. But I'm sure YOU know the score 🤣
@@thumper2111 u call me salty? Have you heard graham whine about all the evil closeminded scientists?
Mineminuetman *cracks knuckles*
Finally, someone with sense.
The amount of braincells in the comment section of this video is astoundingly low... had to scroll waaaay to far down for a milo comment. 😢
Saying like it is.
❤
Milo is a fraud. If you had an ounce of critical thinking or discernment understanding you would easily see right through him.
The British really know how to crush you with polite language, I love it.
Polite language, cherry picked evidence, and pseudo intellectual word salad.
Yep, they sure do.
@@LongJohnLiver Are you referring to what is in the video? Because there is no pseudo intellectual word salad in what that guy said.
@@rct999 lol who else would I be referring to? Hamhock is a fraud who never presents hard evidence, just speculation. His whole approach is basically 'everyone else is wrong, therefore I'm right.' None of his work is peer reviewed, and his only qualification is a degree in sociology. He's a journalist. If I want to learn how to write a magazine article, I'll listen to him. As for archeology, I'll listen to those who have expertise in that field. All he ever does is ask questions, which is just another way of saying 'I can't be bothered to produce evidence so you must produce it for me'. That's not science. He's a grifter and Rogan is his hype man/shill. And all the while hamhocks cult zombies are making him rich.
@@LongJohnLiver everything he said is factually correct
@@YouSmokeChed nope. It was made illegal to climb the GP in 1951. Hancock was born in 1950. Unless he climbed it at less than a year old, he's lying and therefore factually wrong.
I know my stuff.
Hancock: Hold my pyramid.
😭😭😭😭😭
That’s so ironic considering graham repeatedly gets his facts wrong and deliberately lies about the magnitude of things he’s talking about and has admitted that he’s a pseudoscientists
@@zzodysseuszz ok 👌
@Bill Hawkins he's not wrong. Graham's theory's have been heavily debunked. His starting point is fine, it's the facts he leaves out to avoid contradicting himself that's the problem. If he looked at the full picture then it's clear he says the shit he says because it's easy to sell because it is very interesting
@@jakesaunders8955 he goes on rants about how the accepted facts by scholars are lies and they will tell you graham is wrong and how you shouldn’t trust them (the educated scholars who know what they’re talking about) but you should trust him (the uneducated pseudoscientists) because he goes against the mainstream facts which, for some reason, make him more credible or at least more reliable. After setting up this manipulative way of garnering unearned audience trust he will then make some extraordinary claims (extraordinary as in, he makes the feats seem completely impossible if the mainstream consensus and scholars were right thus creating this audience assumption that the scholars must be wrong then) with false supporting evidence (such as incorrect measurements, false dilemmas etc etc) which the audience is now influenced to assume the benefit of the doubt that it could be true as the only reason it sounds extraordinary is because mainstream facts say so and thusly since he had made us think the mainstream facts can’t be trusted his ridiculous claims no longer look ridiculous and instead plausible. He’s essentially trying to brainwash his audience into being more accepting of bullshit by convincing them to ignore any of the proven or even logical explanations that contradict his claims. It’s extremely dishonest and irresponsible for someone whose established a false authority as an archeologist (which he isn’t, he is not an archeologist and has no education in that field).
Just to clear the air guys, it was me who built them.
Wow that's amazing!
you know where my missing sock is
😆😅🤣
Was you on of my helpers?
damn
Oh wow, can you please explain me how you built them?
He just said , YOU DIDN'T DO YOUR HOMEWORK in a polite, British way 😂
Been watching graham hancock since I left high school in 2015. Glad he is getting the recognition he deserves
That “Oh, dear” was brutal!
Why?
Yeah totally, except any layperson could debunk half of what he says off the bat
Doesnt mean anything when it comes from someone like him.
Thats like raspucia on the corner with her 4 inch nails calling me ignorant. i dont value your opinion if it has no value
@@planeboy1324Not even the point, if that were true. 🙄
Ok, go ahead then@planeboy1324
That "Oh dear." hit like an Alabama "Bless your heart."
God that's an excellent comparison
Am English, can confirm. “Oh dear” is pretty much reserved for the worst of the worst.
For example:
You spill your cup of tea: “This is the worse thing that has ever fucking happened in the history of Man.”
The Russians launch a pre-emptive nuclear strike: “ Oh dear.”
"Oh my stars"....😂
The music takes the point Graham is making from surreal to epic
I highly encourage any Hancock fanboys to spend some time watching Miniminuteman’s RUclips series where he analyses his Ancient Apocalypse Netflix show - genuinely fascinating and super informative!
They won't. Thinking hard, Hancock's bullshit easier.
And I highly encourage any Miniminuteman fanboys to spend some time watching DeDunking's videos on his work, particularly his critiques of Ancient Apocalypse. He is friends with both Miniminuteman and Graham Hancock, yet criticises and analyzes both with great skill and knowledge.
@@JacobGrim I watched all of it and still think Graham is a fraud but still thank you for giving me something to do lol
@@saddocatto2784 Hancock is charismatic though
@@saddocatto2784 The show is wishy washy and doesn't get into the details that his books have. Reserve judgment until you've read them.
That ‘Oh, dear’ from Graham translates to ‘What the fuck are you arguing with me for…when you’ve never even seen the very things you’re trying to convince me were constructed by unskilled slave labor!’
🙏🏼Thanks for likes
People that argue with Graham have the hardest time letting go of the false principles they've been taught without ever questioning "Why?"
@@OverRule1 or...he is full of BS
It's in the boible🤣🤦♂️
Just because they were slaves doesn't mean they were unskilled.
@@oftin_wong yeah the amount of bullshit graham says its too much
Finding out the great pyramid actually has 8 sides adds a whole other layer of difficulty in its construction.
If they spent time teaching us the perfect geometry of this thing, more people would probably question it
It does... it is concave, so the center of each side is bowed in, which essentially looks like it has 8 sides. This is seriously overlooked.
@@dubselectorr345 overlooked by the other people in your elementary school?
@TJ ha.. it certainly was. They do not pay attention to such details. However, 30 years ago may have been too soon to step out of the mindless explanations of impossible feats. Much more has been uncovered since then, and every time only points further away from the established story. Does that bother you? You should be open to investigating these places more. Real science. Maybe you can join one time on a tour, if you have not been to Giza, you should, see for yourself.
@@dubselectorr345 That was a very polite, measured, and educated response to a rather rude comment. Salute!
Its a simple explanation. It was a decline in the willingness to create such grand structures and a shift in priorities. Changes in politics and religion and economics can all have an impact. It doesn't mean they no longer knew how to build them. There were other reasons. In the 20th century there was a country that built such crazy rockets that they sent people to the moon. Now they dont. But in that country private enterprise is building them. Do you think there was a market for pyramids in ancient Egypt? No. They were built because the pharaohs wanted them. If there is no demand, then the craft starts to die.
Id like to see Hancock speak with an actual archaeologist
The pyramid builders died in the flood. They were later discovered by the Egyptians
For some reason I truly believe this.. and I have never heard nor seen anyone else say it before.
@@ZxZoZEDIT: I’m not sure why this comment keeps getting misinterpreted I thought it was fairly clear. I’m saying I believe advanced society’s existed that are lost to history not aliens or extra dimensional but indeed human.
why do people automatically want to discredit human ability? Humans are amazing and can accomplish anything we desire, given enough time. People need to give us humans more credit instead of automatically assuming aliens did it just because modern humans don’t yet understand something
We are aliens. The people that built the pyramid where our ancestors. We don't recognize ourselves. Because of de evolution. We belong amongst the stars and Light. Look within yourself and everything about ourselves will reveal itself to you.
@@abrahamhawkins1754 facts apparently and we need to figure out how to spread and normalize that history
@@thechiefwildhorse4651 You should look up the definition of indigenous and take your racist illogical rant elsewhere. Your pride is far beyond you. Humble yourself before the Lord God. Your jealous hatred only creates further division.
This was a lecture not a debate :D
This is not educational. Light fantasy.
No one was debating here though and this is all information that gets put down because institutions don’t do the research into this type of stuff so they claim it isn’t true all while they stick to their theories which make zero sense
@@Robobongo88, really? Why?
@@Robobongo88 why? Whats the explanation then? Dragging tonns of stones on sand ? Or you rather give the credit to alien ..which is your?
When ALL of handcocks piers do not agree with this. What I can't understand is why anyone even believes him. Makes no sense. Its comparable to someone watching a video of someone explain they don't understand basic physics and coming to the conclusion the earth was flat. And absolutely not aliens, what people forget in regards to traversing the cosmos at speeds capable of reasonably getting there in a reasonable time forget time dilation. Not aliens. Could of log rolled a very long way with the amount of slaves. I would bet there's a simple solution to the problem of shifting the bricks the distance they were shifted. Doesn't have to be fantastical
"go to Unas, go to Pepi, go to Teti at Saqqara" is a BARRRRR
¿Dónde está la biblioteca?
Me llamo T-Bone
La araña discoteca
Discoteca, muñeca, la biblioteca
Es en bigote grande, perro, manteca
@@mattryan9376 very insightful
@@mattryan9376 fucking WHAT??!😂
dig up more gobekli tepe, do some lidar in sahara (yuh)
I almost wet myself after that smoke 🤣🤣
The music is so loud it makes it hard to hear what Graham is saying
Right! It sucks. You don’t need to music play over this sharp guy.
It's so loud I haven't been able to hear properly for days
I'm on half volume and heer him just fine over the music.
They dont really want you to hear the truth properly
the comment section on youtube is gai
People really fooled by a weak argument lol. “I’ve been there therefore I’m the authority on the matter”.
ur ignoring why he said that....stay ignorant and stupid😂😂😂😂
I often argue about the things I haven't ever seen
It is even weaker potentially to argue about something one has no first hand knowledge in, because human lie.
@@sash328 have u ever been to watch a sports game live before? If you haven’t then you have no right to talk about the game. You don’t know anything about that game…
@@TacoTomtheBomb I’ve been to see the pyramids of Giza. Many archaeologists haven’t. Therefore I know more about the pyramids of Giza than those archaeologists.
Love that guy he slapped that dude in the face with some REAL knowledge!!! Get em
Clearly you have no background in any field of research.
Knowledge based on what?
Nothing.
He doesn't mention that the smaller pyramids by it are not that well built... it took many many of yrs to perfect the building technique
He doesn't have an ounce of real knowledge, he's a pseudoscientific fraud.
@@drstevej2527says the one talking shit with Porsche pfp
The size of the dent in the table from the mic dropping was measured by future archaeologists and they still don't know how it happened
You get props for this clever comment lol
Brilliant!!!
Funny as f***
Oooosh. Nice comment
🙌😂
Shermer took a big step back because of this episode.
A shame the extent it requires to cause someone to actually LOOK at themselves and their own actions before they themselves do it on their own.
He fell victim of Brandolini's Law. Hancock is a bs artist.
@@casualviewing1096 Is what he said false?
@@casualviewing1096Hancock isn’t. He is part of the unfortunate group of people who see through the flaws of modern consensus. As a geologist, I unfortunately have lost a lot of faith in my sciences consensus as the more arrogant or self righteous of my compatriots will in alignment of the archaeological sciences call myself and others conspirators in some greater game. It’s of course lies. Technology progresses forward, not backward. The erosive patterns in the sphinx enclosure do not lie. Whatever the conjecture, whatever the theory, what remains geologically concrete in my eye, is the theory that the sphinx comes before the oldest of old kingdom sites. This I think, based on the data, is truism of ancient Egypt.
@@Sworn2TheDark Hancock is a joke he uses long words and numbers to sound smart and thinks that interpretation is evidence. He also thinks that because he’s been somewhere that his word on it is the undeniable truth. He’s a misleading fraud who wants revenge because archeology rejects and honestly laughs at him.
I really enjoyed how the music was much louder than the speaking that’s great
Discoveries were, and are still being made by open minded people with questions. Were learning the Earth is older and far more interesting than they have made us believe, and it seems they want to keep it that way. We need people like Graham 🙏 Thank you sir.
Graham is a pseudoscientist and a liar, peddling illogical conspiracy theories to uneducated and susceptible viewers.
Shumer is the kind of guy who refuses to believe anything that isn't completely ordinary and orthodox. Fact is often stranger than fiction.
He takes the views of authority figures and pats himself on the back. He only does surface levels of critical thinking. Lots of people like this.
I’m not a fan of him either.
He’s an idiot
Try learning to spell his name before offering a critique. Secondly the entire scholarly community agrees with him whereas no one believes GH laughable nonsense.
@@drstevej2527 I have long since have learned that the scientific community is full of sh*t. For example, evolution has been disproven long ago. The whole thing runs contrary to the second law of thermodynamics, and the first law of thermodynamics can only overcome the first law with intelligently controlled input of energy, throwing random energy at things only furthers the breakdown of order.
Also there isn't enough time for evolution to take place, there are parameters that dictate this. The spin rate of the earth slows down over time, which means if we go back in time the earth spins faster. Going back ten or twenty thousand years would make very little difference, however hundreds of millions of years, to say nothing of billions of years is a much different matter. At hundreds of millions of years in the past the earth would be spinning so fast that it would be severely bulged at the equator, and at billions of years it would fly apart.
The earth's surface erodes do to wind and rain and snow. From the supposed time of the dinosaurs, hundreds of millions of years ago, it would have been eroded flat as a billiard table, with a even layer of water over it a half dozen times over. But subduction resolves this problem right? Well that would mean dinosaurs were tough indeed, for their bones to have survived that.
The sun shrinks over time, and if we go back hundreds of millions of years or billions of years the earth would be a cinder. There are various other parameters as well, not sure exactly how old the earth is, but it sure as h*ll isn't hundreds of millions or billions of years old.
Now we get to the churning primordial soup with lightning flashing around producing amino acids. A little problem is that a DNA strand is billions of molecules long and is composed of ONLY left handed molecules, so how do you isolate only left handed molecules in this churning primordial soup? That's easy, you can't. And even if I allow for a miracle to accomplish this, then what do you have? A DNA strand floating around in this churning primordial soup isn't going to do anything other than deteriorate. To even theoretically have life you need to be able to reproduce which isn't going to happen unless you have the entire rest of the cell, which is more complex that the most complicated factory on earth. All of this coming together with at the same time and same place, all in working order to even theoretically have life, isn't going to happen no matter how many years you have, I think your going to need another miracle to even advance to the next impossibility.
Well I suppose the answer is panspermia right? If we remove the problem light years away and sweep it under the rug then the problem is solved. We'll we supposedly found evidence of life on meteorites landing on earth. I've seen the evidence and it's weak as h*ll, and even if I allow this argument all it proves is that there is biological material floating around in space, not that evolution has taken place somewhere else.
Graham Hancock is much more on target based on the facts than conventional Egyptologist and Shermer is what I said he is.
Burn the library.... Language, knowledge, culture, art would vanish in moments....
wasn't there a famous library fire?
@@tomatojizzz the Alexandria library I think it was called
@@tomatojizzz yeah but it didn’t happen to burn everything down. It was actually an order from the Roman emperor to burn down the library a couple centuries later because of the rising tension between a pagans and Christians. Long story short the emperor was Christian then the pagans started fighting the Christians then the pagans ran to the library to hide then awhile later the emperor was like “the pagans are free to go but burn that anti-god building” or some bullshit like that. Look up “history buffs agora” if u want more info
@@stephenfanthorpe2708 surely there wouldn't have been knowledge of any sort of ancient civ recordered there cos the Egyptians at the time didn't know about any lost civ
@@stephenfanthorpe2708the Library OF Alexandria….as in the place it was built.
“Sir this is a Wendy’s”
Checkmate my friend
I bet when Will Smith slapped Chris Rock you also said "Checkmate My Friend". Both showed the same level of intellect.
@@pyotrberia9741 who hurt you
@@pyotrberia9741 your comment is so lame it actually made me chuckle
@@mikeboshko2623 , You uneducated Hancock fanboys always make me chuckle. Are you also a flat earther?
The Pyramids were build by using the very loud music in this video, the tones and vibrations emitted by them are enough to lift megaliths!
Tones and vibrations.....
ALL SOUND IS VIBRATIONS!!
ffs the level of ignorance about this in these comment sections is shocking proof of just how many people skip school days.
@@ish4638 😅
@@ish4638 they were just saying the music on this video is loud af😂
Twaddle. Let's see someone even stack house bricks using that method!
Being a good debater doesn’t make you right.
Burying water under sand using a digerido to make the sand move reducing the half-life or temperature cooling depth because it's moving it could freeze it easier making it possible to use the ice to basically bench press the stone lifting it up.
What's more interesting to me is how loud the BGM over the people's voices on this YT Shorts!
I use Ancient Egyptian sound frequency technology to give you energy.
@@BrainShortsYT name of the track?
@@BrainShortsYTyou need help
The passion in his voice 👌🏻
Liars can be passionate too.
When Graham Hancock said "oh dear" he sounded like on of the scientists in half life
Questionable ethics
If only he was as useful. Sometimes those scientists open doors.
Bro actualy hitted it with the: let's just spit out numbers
Was he wrong tho?
Go ahead and compare the Giza stats to the pyramids that came after.
It's literally no contest, not even close.
And the ones at Giza, despite being older, are in MUCH better condition. They have withstood the test of time in damn near perfect condition.
The others are crumbling to piles of rubble.
He was not wrong, I just do not like the way these facts are being used.
They are realy cool, but instead of being like: these are some cool facts about pyramids, it is more often used as 'evidence' for Atlantis.
How is it possible that the architecture got worse over time?
Declining economy?
Shift in political power?
External or internal needs that required more immediate attention?
A population shift?
...weed? To stoned to move actual stone? (Today's 4/20...could be...)
We may never know, and we could be wrong about everything we _think_ we know now.
What we _should_ know, however, is that if we stop asking these questions we never will know. And that is the worst intellectual crime any one person or society can make. Which is why Hancock's work is so valuable and should be cherished regardless of any ultimate answers that may come. Asking questions is the most vital step in obtaining wisdom.
Well said
maybe they werent the same post a certain individual..
Architecture has not gotten worse, we just don't have a reason to build a pyramid that would cost multi-billions like the Egyptians did. Also, I highly encourage you to watch miniminutemans debunking of graham Hancock he makes good points that graham is not right on many things.
@@saddocatto2784 I'm a big fan of la Belle Epoque, personally.
Hancock plays a very interesting role in the sciences. It's not anything new, but his role is absolutely indispensable and often overlooked or outright dismissed. Much to the detriment of the intellectual pursuits. He connects the dots, speculates, and asks questions based on what he's observed from a variety of otherwise segregated disciplines. And this is a crucial step in nudging, but at times driving, the direction of some of those same disciplines. Think Jules Verne, Wells, Newton, Einstein. All of them latteral thinkers speculating on absurd notions...only to be shown as visionaries after they were initially laughed at. I just mentioned a few, but that list could go on and on.
There's also a truism that is almost always overlooked, if it's even taught anymore, that often debunks those who would debunk. So whenever you see a debunking going on, on most topics anywhere you look, you will often see this mistake played out on a grand scale. The truism says, "absence of evidence, _is not_ evidence of absence.". So whenever you hear, "X didn't happen, because there's no evidence of X". Then there's your evidence of a very weak position, not to be taken too seriously.
One thing that is always overlooked, which tells me that many of Hancock's critic's don't actually _read_ his material, is that he'll often go into great detail and note the arguments against his positions _in his own books_ . Which I find inordinately honest and refreshing, not to mention rare.
@@ravenslaves have you watched miniminutemans video series debunking graham hancock, Milo watched his entire netflix show and went through it episode by episode? I would not consider Hancock on the level of a great thinker, as many of his claims about ancient civilizations, aliens, or artifacts have very little backing. However, I do think many scientists are not good at communicating and teaching the younger generations, and this causes people to be miseducated or not ask questions of why and how things work in the world.
"Don't argue with idiots. They'll just bring you down to their level and beat you with experience."
That "oh dear" was killer.
“Roight” followed by “oh dear” deadly combo
Michael Shermer has made a career out of literally being dumb on purpose.
On purpose?
Michael shermer has made a career out of debunking bullshit.
To be fair, so has Graham Hancock lmfao
Lol, I can watch this over and over. And the editing is on point showing us the other pyramid examples as they're mentioned. Great job.
Look at St Peters Basilica in Rome
Why aren't all churches as grand as that
Why has there been a dramatic decline in the ability of Christians to build churches
How Joe looks at Graham when he says oh dear 😂, it’s like, oh shit you’ve got him now 🤣
Graham obviously never seen the experimental pyramids in Egypt.😂
Still was able to hear Graham, the music needs to be louder next time.
You're alive and commenting, that's the real problem here. Unalive yourself and save somebody the headache of life in prison.
@@GrapheneOxideIsInCVVax you just wished death on someone for not believing a charlatan, seek professional help
@@GrapheneOxideIsInCVVax Imagine identifying with a conspiracy theory so badly that you tell others to kill themselves. Tell me you're susceptible for bullshit without telling me. Damn you people are insufferable.
@@GrapheneOxideIsInCVVaxinstead of using the tin foil for the hat, consume it
@@justcarterr To end up with a heavy metal laden brain like yours? No thanks sir cucksalot. FYI, your comment shows how washed your brain is considering the whole tinfoil thing is propaganda to make you not realize how close to reality it actually has many use cases especially in the deflection of EMF. I wouldn't expect someone of your caliber to know that though, or anything for that matter.
If we didn't lose some knowledge along the way, then we would know how they built the pyramids.
It really isn't up for debate
Our society didn't develop from theirs, so why would we have their knowledge?
We know how they built them too.
@@orionlax626 how?
@@SeregaOrgan
They used shallow ramps to transport the blocks to the top on wheels.
@@orionlax626 and the source is?
@@SeregaOrgan
I'm not going looking for a source. This is pretty well-known at this point, and I really don't care enough about this issue.
He’s still just making it up as he goes and I’m a huge Graham fan, but I can enjoy it for what it is…entertainment and wonder!
Dudes like " oh I understand" while Hancock proceeds to explain to him that he clearly DOESN'T Understand at all 😅...
I respect him a lot for a person I have never met before.
The Pop quiz you weren't ready for.
Graham Hancock is so smooth brained its hilarious
Me climb rock pile, have you climb rock pile?
Check mate Ath-ist.
Calling someone an Atheist because they state an opinion that has grounded origins. How is that fair? I mean Graham Hancock is a pseudo scientist or archaeologist I can’t remember. One of his one quotes proves it “I am no more a pseudo *insert whichever it is* than a dolphin is a pseudo-fish”. Come on now.
@@A_Simple_Mithios both really. He used to be a purponent of lost civilizations on Mars lol
Oh wait, I’m an idiot. My dumbass somehow thought you were insulting krazy, the original commenter of this thread.
This is the problem today, any lunatic with no proof can become famous and rich but repeatedly saying lies and brings no proof to the table. This guy should just be cancelled unless he proves anything... which he will never manage to.
To be honest not all of us have a trust fund that allows us to just travel whenever we want
He sounds so smart...and yet he's wrong. That's a skill I guess.
And you would know?
@@samdamico6903he doesn’t he’s just spouting pish for attention
@Bingobanana4789 😂 bruh he just now told you the facts of the pyramid go back to school and study history this time. Instead of sleeping in playin video games and eating snack packs all day kid.
@@sukmynut I wasn’t referring to Hancock, I was referring to the guy who made the comment. See how I replied to the person who replied to the person making the comment. Seems your a bit of a retard and can’t read. Perhaps it’s you who needs to go back to school, I hear there is a spot at the Derek zoolander school for kids that can’t read right or do things good just for you.
Tells us what's wrong
You forgot to add the crazy part where he says pyramids were built telekinetically.
As opposed to what?
It wouldn’t make sense to a barbarian though I think you can stop trying to understand
@@FracturedParadigmsas opposed to human will power to cut stones in a cube and stack them in a triangle. it’s really not hard to comprehend
@justcarterr6375 oh yeah, sounds simple. There's nothing more to think about really.
@@FracturedParadigms well you don’t need to listen to the opinions of someone who believes they were built by telekinesis or aliens
Man got wrecked by a guy named Flint Dibble
Nah. He didn't. Flint decided to focus the arguments he is an expert (seeds/nutrition patterns) but throw under the rug the geologic questioning. Typical gatekeeping in academia.
Flint Dibble is a worm and a joke
@@drakkheinI was a huge believer in Graham’s stuff but that debate was a clear win for Dibble. Hancock just kept reverting back to “you can’t prove it DIDN’T exist” while being unable to provide a shred of evidence that a civilization DID in fact exist. He’s right that the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence but at the same time there needs to be at least some sort of indication that an advanced civilization existed beyond things like “these underwater rocks look too weird to be natural.”
@@royalgoose7646 , I'm a GH fan and IMO everyone lost in this debate, make no mistake. 1. GH failed to actually make his point by bringing more hard core, factual arguments. However a. These were the very people who actually called him a charlatan. b. Flint clearly associated him with racists and bigotry. It's hard to keep calm in this situation. 2. I don't think it was a clear win for Flint. Flint only decided to debate with his expertise and ignore other arguments (I'm in academia and that's a common trick) he kept saying "I'm not a Geologist, I can't debate on this". Well, if you want to understand the phenomena at its totality you don't get to pick the argument you want to debate, that introduces bias. I don't mind not existing an ancient civilization. But GH brings a hypothesis and the way Flint portrays himself only brings bad rep for us scientists.
@@drakkheinIf you were actually a scientist then you would understand why Dibble doesn't debate outside of his field. It's not a trick, it's being mature enough to admit you don't know everything and cannot debate on every subject under the sun. It's like asking a plumber to weigh in on what the electrician is doing.
They do make some damn good cotton sheets though.....
Every single thing he’s baffled by has been explained. He’s literally just using big words to seek confirmation bias.
Like what?
Everything you learned is wrong.
True north also crosses through Ohio. Did aliens built Ohio?
Conspiracy theorist is a mental illness
Ohio is ALIGNED with true north? Who knew?!😂🤡@@Pinicle_of_evolution
And the head of Egyptian antiquities is destroying ALL OF IT...
Piramids were very expensive to build. It leaded Egypt's economy to downfall.
No it didn't but foreigners did much like the US
Is he debating someone? If so please provide a link 🙏🏽
I think it's Graham Hancock on the Joe Rogan Experience. I think he's been on his podcast a few times. Interesting fella.
Edit. But he's not really debating him lol. Just conversing.
This is from JRE #961. It wasn't an established "debate", but they certainly disagreed about several things. Subscribe if you want to see some more cool clips I edit from this one!
Graham is debating the egyptologists who have established all of what is taught in schools about egypt
@user-ep4ln7hs6hCorrect, this guy (Michael Shermer) is not an Egyptologist. He’s a mainstream scientist who runs Skeptic Magazine, a science publication. Being a part of the mainstream, he often feels the need to defend mainstream points of view that he has no knowledge or expertise in. Makes for some great content 😂
@@BrainShortsYTMichael Shermer is a fool Graham schooled him in this podcast to the point it was obvious Shermer is arguing in bad faith
And apparently don’t argue with him especially if you’re an archaeologist, historian, etc. because he’ll just cry that you’re singling him out for speaking “the truth”.
Title: Don’t Argue With Graham Hancock
Me: ya know, I think I’m gonna argue with the journalist who wants to pretend he’s an archeologist
This isn’t even arguing. He’s just talking over the guy and spitting out random semi-related points in the hope that you won’t stop to pick them apart.
@@hhhenry8488 Read his books and watch the full interview. Graham makes this guy look like a fool.
"One does not speak unless one knows." The Mandalorian
It still surprises me, why the hell Graham is still speaking... What surprises me even more, is why the hell there are people listening to him, and believing him...
@@pablomachine2607 "One does not speak unless one knows." 🤫
@@verawiin1719Graham Hancock is about the most ignorant person ever so he should listen to your advice and try shutting up a little.
It was here before the Egyptians and they found it and took credit for it and tried to rebuild and couldn’t that’s why they couldn’t build anything else like it
did you know that carbon dating is a thing
Graham Hancock, there are goblins under my bed, you’ve never been too my bed so you must now support my claim that there are goblins under it.
Read his books. You aren't informed enough to speak on him until you have.
@@TheKaneECO “Fall for the scam, you can’t talk on the scammer without falling for his scam.” He’s an author dude, his only goal is to sell you books, I’ve read enough to understand he’s great at writing but he will never be a good researcher. You can’t use things that are known not to be any kind of evidence, any of the old maps or the beach rock at Bimini for example, despite neither actually supporting his claim he will just lie or omit details in order to sound more believable. Read a book by an actual scientist, start with a book on what beach rock is, then you’ll see he purposely leaves out details or actively doesn’t research what he’s arguing against.
@@Bascillion you realize most of the things in his books ARE sourced by actual scientists? More evidence that you’ve not read his books since all of his sources are marked.
I don’t think that 100% of his ideas are true. But the overall message that human civilization is far older and was far more advanced than we initially assumed seems very hard to argue against. From the work that Randal has done and the information that Graham has reported on there is no doubt in my mind that we don’t have the full picture.
Bringing such things into the open is such a major victory for Graham and all the researchers he represents.
I don’t think he’s some holy prophet, but his work deserves some level of respect. Denying this is plain ignorant.
@@TheKaneECOYou can twist facts to make anything seem true if you're clever enough. I can say that Alexander the Great was the best conqueror of all time, and present all of his triumphs, but do the triumphs of ATG alone really make him that great? What about the counter arguments that Persia was in decline after its recent loss to the Greeks a century earlier? What about his failure to invade India? What about how his empire collapsed upon his death? What about other people who were great conquerors like Genghis Khan, Charlemagne, or Justinian? Intentional omission is still a form of lying, and GH has been called out on it multiple times by the researchers he cites. The truth of the matter is that humanity is at its peak right now, and while the Bronze Age Collapse and the Fall of Rome were certainly Dark Ages, technological progress actually accelerated during those periods, with Iron Working and Chemistry dramatically speeding up in both instances. Greece went from a single powerful confederation led by Mycenae to a collection of rivaling city states that, while weaker individually, managed to collectively hold off Persia, an Empire Mycenae would've had no hope against. Rome likewise would've had no chance against the Ummayads and Mongols, but the kingdoms it birthed held off both, and eventually spread across the entire world.
When you hear Hancock say Oh Dear you better fucking run 😂
You have to argue with him. He doesn't know what he is doing. None of his work is peer reviewed. He is not an Archaeologist. I think he has great passion in his work and he written a bunch of books but they amount to his work vs the rest of the scientific and archaeology body of specialist that are published and peer reviewed. Most, if not all of them disagree with many of his thoughts and theories.
Milo Rossi actually argued with Graham Hancock outstandingly well. You should check out miniminutemans series on ancient apocalypse if you like challenging your own beliefs.
He rips graham a new one
Miniminuteman has admitted to never having been to a dig, or barely any of these historical sites… he actually admits he can’t call himself an archaeologist. Meanwhile Hancock has been all over the world speaking first hand to archaeologists and local historians
@harrisoncurtis204 That was the worst attempt at debunking anything. That kid is a fraud. Work on your discernment skills buddy, he's a hack.
@@Rivarya I disagree completely. All that kid did was cite stuff that only the brainwashed mainstream would fall for.
@@M1ster.Fr3sh 💀 you made me laugh
Right.. Oh dear..! 😂😂😂😂 fatality
The decline in building skills have to do with the civil wars that were taking place in Egypt at the time
NOOOOO IT WAS ANCIENT HI TECH CIVILIZATIONS NOOOOOOO
Journalist schooling a professor. "Oh Dear "
Your saying history books won't be wrong under another discovery don't heckle a person as he's probably researched more
Joe fucking Rogan is faaaaar from a professor. I applaud him for trying to poke the bear and see if it will open its eyes but hes not the right guy to do this.
Consider watching or listening to archeologists theres quite a few who put their works onto the web these days.
I love how he said he understood but before that admitted he had never been to either....like my dude self awareness is key here.
Cool how the video cuts off the archeologist's response who proceeds to answer his questions
That's the difference in someone who is well read and researched vs someone who's read a highlight in a times magazine.
Apparently well read to you = read the most basic information on the subject that is easily dispensible within a 70 second YT short? 😂
@@mnomadvfx So basically you don't know who the guy is and are just talking. The man, Graham Hancock, has decades of experience while you are practicing getting fat and hold zero educational background.
Your move, loser.
Someone deeply versed in a given arena is not to be crossed nor taken lightly. He and Jordan Peterson are shining examples.
Lost all their workers, area fell to shit
Then why start a new one???
Graham! You are so adorable :)
I’m still waiting the day to say something so enlightening and true so the dramatic music starts playing in the background
What happened is that knowledge got lost and whoever were the people who held that knowledge, died along with it. How they came to acquire it is an even bigger mystery that Graham is searching for to discover
Except you don't develop that knowledge overnight, nor is it only on say, a few tablets that can be easily lost or broken for a project this massive and civilization defining. Educated builders and even the laymen, both of which must've been numbered thousands or tens of thousands, would know all of this and pass it on if given the chance.
@@jakegray1723 no that isn’t the case. If it were how things were made that way, it would have been known for ages. It is literally lost knowledge. Of course it’s a complex way of technology that really most likely its evidence is completely wiped off the face of the Earth and we can only scrounge up how it was intricately made to speculate how they did it
@C. Galindo It was known for ages, before and during their no-doubt, very long construction time(s). That said, the rest of your statement I agree with.
Y’all are too impressed by a pair of glasses and British accent.
@@jaredderrera9433 Graham is a quack
Yeah don't argue with him, he read the brochure.
He reminds me of the pizza delivery guy in, "there's something about mary".
He certainly says things in an intelligent way. That doesn’t mean that he’s not saying utter bs without any real factual, scientific basis or any professional evidence
Damn. He sonned him. Dude knows.
When man gets TOLD, eloquently tho!!!
I love the implication that they used the metric system
You go, Sir...keep telling us the TRUTH!!
lies
i know graham means well but his ramblings are getting more and more incoherent
means well by saying pure shite
Don’t argue with graham hancock?….graham Hancock chooses to argue with people with no knowledge of what he’s talking about and that’s why he wins here. When he talks with archaeologists, he loses terribly and has pretty hurt feelings about it. I don’t choose to run foot races against children in order to feel better about myself and neither should graham hancock.
How does he lose
how is that related to anything@dudeDOGn
@@daveybigtechsno1fangurl518his point is debunked very quickly and unceremoniously, the reason people believe him is because he’s a master manipulator, he sets you up and then knocks you down, watch the mini minuteman videos on it, they’re very informative
@@daveybigtechsno1fangurl518 He cannot answer any arguments, his main line of argumentation is "YOU DON'T KNOW THAT THERE WASN'T A SUPERCIVILISATION 12 THOUSAND YEARS AGO"
Sounds like he is talking to Michael Shermer?
What a man. & JR brings these guys together incredibly. Oh dear - best diss ever 😂😂
How does a skeptic sit there and be skeptical without having even been to see the pyramid in question? It's lunacy.
Throughly enjoyed Milo utterly destroying every stupid argument this chump ever made.
whut
@@QUEfrang miniminuteman has an entire series pointing out why this guy is a crack
@@ronryan3210 it sounds interesting i willl go watch
Archaeology doesnt care that you have climbed the pyramid Graham. It makes no difference. It is of no consequence.
Hes making a legitimate point that you dont understand his point until you see it in person. Ill give grahm credit, he has gotten out and studied everything for himself and not just whats portrayed to us in books (some by people who have never even seen it)
If I go to the Great Wall of China look around and claim it was built by a mystical Buddhist monk using only his left toe, then is it true?
Graham Hancock is a well researched guy....people need to open their eyes...
Oh dear my child I will be sending you to the shadow realm