One of the best things that internet and particularly youtube gave to humanity was the opportunity to read a book in just 35 minutes by listening to the presentations of the books by the authors around the world! Thank you Alan Turing, Vint Cerf, Chad Hurley , Steve Chen and Jawed Karim!
I read his book Sapiens, it’s an amazing book that changed my life and how I perceive things now. This speech doesn’t capture how good his book is. Bill Gates and other elites read it
It's brilliant. Mr Harari put it so simplest way anyone can understand what really we humans are and what we are doing. Unfortunately we are out of control and corrupted.
I've listened to quite a number of videos with Yuval Harari .. up to 2022 .. and this short video of merely 35 minutes summarizes perfectly the state of the human mind.
Brilliant lecture sir after reading 📖 your book 📖 Sapiens this was a small revision of that book 👍🏻 keep guiding an intelligent human race time to time sir 😇🙏🏻🙏🏻love from India 🇮🇳
Rka - You have completely lost the plot if you think he's saying that we are gods in some braggadocious sense. He is saying we have reached a technological sophistication that we have either a dangerous or a miraculous level of power - our technology can destroy the *entire* planet in a single instant if we misuse it. Or we can save and improve lives by eradicating all disease *completely* if we use our technology for good. Both of these are "god like" abilities, and it will be true in the next 100 years.
Wait... toward the end; "suffering" is reality?! Buddha said (although I didi not hear first hand) that there is a way to eliminate suffering - the four noble truth. Yuval Harari went to 45-day vipassana meditation. I did dozen of 10-day vipassana. If suffering is the most prominent form of what we face, would it not be the case to realize what Buddha/ vipassana points to? (Or is this the key message he is pointing to? - as may be discussed in his following books? I have a hunch...). May all beings be happy!
Je suis très frappé par le choix du critère de différentiation du réel et de la fiction énoncé par Yuval Harari : la souffrance. La séparation entre le monte réel et le monde de la fiction réalisée par une de nos pire crainte : souffrir ! ... C'est édifiant car ça marche ! Pour aller plus loin, j'aimerai noter les points suivants : le réel et la fiction définissent une frontière intéressante mais il en est une autre qui mérite notre attention. Le monde réel dans une vision scientifique coïncide avec le monde tangible. En effet, est tangible ce qui est accessible aux sens (directement ou indirectement via des instruments qui relaient les sens humains). Cependant, une question taraude depuis toujours l'esprit humain : le monde réel se réduit-t-il au monde tangible ? Autrement dit, existe-il des choses ou des êtres qui appartiennent au monde réel mais qui soient néanmoins intangibles ? Cette question est généralement en dehors du domaine des investigations des scientifiques. Elle est cependant l'objet de beaucoup de réflexions chez l'homme. Pour avancer dans la réflexion, faisons un petit détours vers la pensée scientifique. Jusqu'à Heisenberg, la conviction que tout était intrinsèquement mesurable était profondément ancrée dans l'esprit des scientifiques. Les défauts où les impossibilités de mesure étaient attribuées à des incapacités pratiques ou techniques qui ne demandaient qu'à être résolues par le progrès. Il s'est avéré que cette conviction était fausse, c'est à dire que l'idée que nous nous faisions du réel était contraire à l'intuition : les choses sont intrinsèquement plus complexes car empreintes d'incertitudes interdépendantes. Le réel n’est pas conforme à notre intuition. Personnellement je pense que réduire par principe le monde le réel à ce qui est tangible procède du même type d'intuition irrationnelle. On les qualifie habituellement d’a priori ou de parti pris. Cette intuition inspirée par l’époque moderne pourrait donc s'avérer tout aussi fausse que celle concernant la mesurabilité arbitrairement précise des quantité physiques. Ce n'est pas parce que nous ne pouvons pas percevoir de façon tangible une chose qu'elle n'existe pas. C’est de la logique élémentaire. Maintenant il faut bien distinguer l’hypothèse de l'existence de l'intangible néanmoins réel de la pensée imaginative, conceptuelle ou mythique. J'accorde que cette distinction n'est pas très évidente mais elle a certainement un sens au moins dans le cadre de la logique. Sous cette forme, le syllogisme défectueux est sans soute plus clair : tout ce qui est tangible est réel donc ce qui n'est pas tangible est fiction... ça coince n'est-ce pas ? c'est bien pourtant le raisonnement implicitement emprunté par ce show... Je reviens maintenant au critère énoncé par Yuval Harari pour distinguer ce qui est réel de ce qui ne l'est pas. Dans l'expérience intuitive, cela sonne très juste et en même temps très humain. J'ai noté également qu'il rangeait dans la catégorie fiction et non pas dans le monde réel les religions. J’en déduit que, contrairement aux personnes religieuses, il n’accorde pas à Dieu le statut même potentiel de réalité intangible. J'ai bien remarqué que dans sa présentation la personne du Christ était évoquée et que la croix apparaissait dans les images projetées à l’écran. Lors de l'évocation de la souffrance comme discriminant du réel et de l'imaginaire, j'ai été frappé par le fait que la croix est bien un l'instrument de torture donc est le symbole de la souffrance humaine. Elle est infligée à un Juif pieux qui se dit être le messie et le verbe de Dieu, qui par sa souffrance établit une lien entre l'homme et Dieu. Le Christ est-il au carrefour du monde réel et du monde imaginaire ou bien du monde réel tangible et du monde réel intangible ? Plus profondément, je trouve très pertinent d'identifier la souffrance comme étant caractéristique du vécu humain réel. Je suis en revanche beaucoup plus réservé sur la distinction binaire entre le réel et fiction dans laquelle on rangerait sans ménagement les religions avec l'invention de la monnaie et du code civil. J'estime donc que l'anthropologie processuelle doit approcher ces sujets avec une certaine prudence. La question du réel intangible n'est pas une question mineure et il est facile de montrer que l'on ne peut pas y répondre par la négative sans faire des entorses manifestes à des principes fondamentaux de la logique et de la démarche scientifique. Pour les personnes ayant des convictions religieuses, l'analyse de Yuval Harari bien que brillante, ne semble pas d'une finesse suffisante pour pouvoir se permettre de classifier de façon presque désinvolte les religions dans le domaine des fictions. Il faut les classer dans le domaine des religions sans chercher à les faire rentrer au chausse pieds dans un cadre conceptuel au service d’une démonstration parmi d’autre. Je rappelle également que sur ce domaine la susceptibilité des intéressés est parfois explosive. Donc prudence… Pour résumer mon opinion, ce n'est pas parce qu'une explication de ce type est brillante qu'elle doit dépasser le cadre de sa fonction : proposer des processus anthropologiques qui éclairent l'histoire de sapiens et non pas promouvoir implicitement une vision qui s'inspire fortement des philosophies modernes à priori athées qui identifient l'être à la matière. Eric.
Ce que je comprend de votre intangible, c'est qu'il ne peux avoir aucune action sur les humains, sinon il deviendrai mesurable, et donc tangible. Je trouve qu'il n'y a qu'un intérêt à l'intangible, c'est de tenter de le rendre tangible. Si ce n'est pas le cas, on ne peux utiliser que notre imagination pour définir l'intangible. Dans ce cadre, entre la croyance en un dieu, en de multiples dieux ou même en des licornes invisibles, je ne peux rien favoriser apriori, seulement m'interroger sur l'effet de ces croyances sur le monde tangible.
I sense some Nietzsche in Harari's background, but he deviates in some way. One major deviation is his take on human "cooperation"....that we have done so much due to "cooperation" (a collectivist trope). I find Nietzsche's analysis more compelling, namely, that everything great in the history of humans, good or bad, has been due to a very teency tiny number of ultra-capable humans that created high points around which people did not cooperate, but fell into line like herd animals.
I’m thinking of when crowds go to the beach, each person finds a space for themselves on the beach. They don’t fight over spaces. Or when peopl get on the bus. They use the vacant seats and the rest stand. I think this is what he means when he says sapient are naturally co,operative. Unless we are at ar of course.
In 30.45 he says that the fictional effort about European construction is the reason why there is peace in Europe while in the past there is war.Well, in the past also, in prehistory also there where peaceful inspirations. attested indirectly by early writings if we read them in evolutionary perspective. But they did not grow to be peace movement then peace reality , effectively because they were not kept, saved, transmitted through time via writing, documentation....So there was war because there was not that kind of ubiquitous memory embodied in the writing, in the alphabet and the paper....Not?
He said there were 5 types of humans.. what about what separates modern homo sapians from them??? Anyway, Maybe it’s just me, maybe I’m missing something. Please enlighten me where I’m seeing this all wrong
Harari in this book warns about the influence of artifical intelligence, which is known since the 10th century. Ahmad Mohamad bin Hamad Al Ghazali -- a Persian Scientist, Philosopher, Mamathiciam, and religious Cleric, was the Dean of School of Nizamia in Baghdad- Iraq -- a very prestigious Faculty of the time, more famous than Harvard, Princeton, Oxford ..etc combined, after few years of teaching he did warn the society about the danger of scientific progress, invention, and application. He single handed did turn all scientific discovery of the time upside down and called it work of evil. He quit his job and turned into Sofieisim--he did publish over 70 books in the course of his life, when one read his books then it become obvious where Harari got most of the ideas.
In regards to the antitheistic undertones of this particular oration I concur completely but don't think for a second when there's a gun to my temple that I'm not pleading to God for my life .a Maxim I think even Yuval would adhere to .
We are mainly different from animals, because we created the capacity to destroy bigly and conquer our surrounding, and we did destroy bigly and conquered the world, and destroy it.
Very yes, and there are some other remarkable 'shortcuts' but it is a good idea to put the question of sufferance in the foreground. Were religions consequently practising this they would be worth their 'money'. We would live nearly in a paradise by now.
The ability of us to cooperate flexibily in large numer is not unique in nature. The school of fishes or birds can did similar thing following the guidance of their leader. What is really amazing and make us the dominant force in the world is the fact ：we can be bonded strongly by the good storytellers. It is similar reason why we invest in the Tesla long time before it start making profits. Why do we trust strangers and are willingly to follow the storyteller. Possible explanation is we are the offspring of people that are willingly to trust the leader. Luckily the trust make our ancestor more coherent and whether some extremely bad enviromental pressure that our ancestral cousins can not get thrugh without confidence in their fellows and the future. The key of storystelling is the ability to depict a wonderous future and boost the confidence of people
This is manipulation not reality. This is reality of which the likes of him sprung from. "How Big Oil Conquered the World” - Corbettreport • 01/09/2016” And "Why Big Oil Conquered the World"
Greatings to Yuval Harari, who claims to be animal...So cheers to the animals. I think that animals have no moral laws. Love one another, who has not broken this word in the world? Yuval Harari MADNESS !!! WHY DO MAD PEOPLE WANT TO LEAD US, WHERE THEY WILL TAKE US??? WHY WE SHOULD LISTEN TO BLIND LEADERS. WE LIKE TO LISTEN TO FAIRY TALES WHEN WE REALLY KNOW THE TRUTH. EVERYTHING IS SO SIMPLE AND THIS ENDLESS THINKING AND EXCAVATION LEADS ONLY TO DARKNESS. CONFUSION! THE MORE WE KNOW AND ACHIEVE, THE GREATER DARKNESS WE GET, WE ARE DRIVING DEEPER AND DEEPER IN THE WATERS OF LOSTNESS. OUR WISE MAN -FOOLS, OUR EDUCATED - CHEATERS, OUR RICH - EXPLOITERS.... WHAT'S NEXT? A ROTTING WORLD AND ITS RISING ODOR... SHAME.
My opinions on scientific is the truth being to explain how everything’s different. The amazing things that I feeling in a lot of things for example, the Pyramids and the building of the ancestors did togetherness with world heritage that UNESCO respecting each building heritage. In the natural it’s amazingly for me as think about too many species in differences such as too many insects 🐜 for example, or too little too see through their wings flying, in the soils on the flowers 💐, how’s interestingly 😊. When you talk about the truth being there’re always things with evidence , the logic and the reasons. How’s it being around with unbelievable views amazing me. When you find out about what’s happening in the situation, it’s not just talking without referencing. It’s believable with increasing. With the faith of God’s in my heart it’s sacrifices 🙏🏻, myself opening, I believe in humanity wisdoms and behave that leads me how’s ashamed for just thinking of yourself egos not to leave troubles to the other’s. It’s my impressing time when I watched the video by the Russia President, said if’s you don’t help yourself, how’s God’s helps you. The faith brings us together and should be happy 😃 and happy for we’re world brotherhood equality 😀. Please talking with the truth in every way possible. How can you remember about what’s you said if’s you lies and you couldn’t tell the truth with no truth.
The commenter above me is correct. However, if you want to be more specific, Kenya has produced a significant number of human fossils, with Australothepicus anamensis being as old as 4.2 million years!
il termine en disant:Nous devrions faire la différence entre les entités réelles et les entités fictives. Car très souvent, nous causons beaucoup de souffrances à des entités réelles et cela au service de entités fictives qui existent uniquement dans notre imaginaire!( en anglais:WE should make différence between réal entities and fictional entities. Because very often we cause many sufferings to real entities in the service of fictional entities that exist only in our imagination. )Mais attention : cela peut être de l' idéotechnologie couplée à de la phraséologie flottante. Car ces entités réelles vs entités fictives peuvent être :le luxe facilement acquis vs les idéaux de liberté et républiqueou(avec raison) la communauté humaine et l'environnement naturel vs le progrès technologique et la croissance économique.
'Reality' vs 'myth, necessary stories, fiction' in future course of history itself seems to me a contradicting idea 'according' to your discourse! What is the reality? Is there any reality? Reality itself is actually one of your stories, isn't it? Listening to your lecture, Nietsche kept telling me thus.
One of the best things that internet and particularly youtube gave to humanity was the opportunity to read a book in just 35 minutes by listening to the presentations of the books by the authors around the world! Thank you Alan Turing, Vint Cerf, Chad Hurley
, Steve Chen and Jawed Karim!
Brumaspirit so
Brumaspirit
you are a good data-seeker. Thank You
@minnie mouth the buybull the script man wrote. God doesn’t need
a king or a book the people in control did and do.
I read his book Sapiens, it’s an amazing book that changed my life and how I perceive things now. This speech doesn’t capture how good his book is. Bill Gates and other elites read it
I endorse the comment with full accord
Thanks Universal for having Professor Harari now.
I stay on Bangladesh. Thankful to Harari to utter our country’s name.
Lol oh you’re just so honoured now!
@@msheart2 Oh yea he's been mentioned by the man who will help facilitate the demise of humanity.
How lucky we are older time people have to have tv or go out to hear like this now here im on the corner of my house hearing and enjoying
Harari appears to be the US I himself. Thank You.
I love to listen to this guy, not too many people take its time to meditate and analyze these important aspects the rules in our lives unnecessarily
So true. What are you listening to these days?
Your not that bright if you like this guy
Yuval, you are so delightfully! We are thirsty for truth!
“Even a chicken is more real than the European Union “
Impact of Harari will remain for centuries to come.
It's brilliant. Mr Harari put it so simplest way anyone can understand what really we humans are and what we are doing. Unfortunately we are out of control and corrupted.
متفق
You claim humans are corrupt and out of control, this guy is the epitome of corruption and paid to suck you into a transhuman agenda of slavery.
He's insane
I've listened to quite a number of videos with Yuval Harari .. up to 2022 .. and this short video of merely 35 minutes summarizes perfectly the state of the human mind.
"How Big Oil Conquered the World” - Corbettreport • 01/09/2016”
And "Why Big Oil Conquered the World"
I am really happy that I am living in age where I can use internet and watch wonderfull person as yuval harari 💓
Yuval himself, is pretty good at giving us stories to believe in......😎
I have always wondered about this. Great talk. What he said about money is also interesting. Will research further.
Brilliant lecture sir after reading 📖 your book 📖 Sapiens this was a small revision of that book 👍🏻 keep guiding an intelligent human race time to time sir 😇🙏🏻🙏🏻love from India 🇮🇳
Fantastic speech I have ever listened. 👌
Brilliant. Love it.
Yuval reminds us of what we are.
Those who are too removed from reality
will hate him.
No, actually those of us who love nature & organic life may dislike this manipulator, we want only to be left alone by this WEF tool .
@@msheart2 I am very sure M'sheArt2, that your
wish is possible.
And that you will be left alone.
"Must we ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it?" Friedrich Nietzsche Death of God
Paul Jones his sister wrote that.
a banana for a coconut is a bad deal . Maybe a banana for a cordless drill and a coconut.
Wish I could give 1000 likes
One of the most dangerous algorithms alive, Yuval Harari!
Could you elaborate?
Are you saying the ideas expressed by him are dangerous? Mind explaining?
Rka - You have completely lost the plot if you think he's saying that we are gods in some braggadocious sense.
He is saying we have reached a technological sophistication that we have either a dangerous or a miraculous level of power - our technology can destroy the *entire* planet in a single instant if we misuse it. Or we can save and improve lives by eradicating all disease *completely* if we use our technology for good. Both of these are "god like" abilities, and it will be true in the next 100 years.
Gratidão hoje assistido por sugestão de um curso pela fundação Bradesco chamado Regulação da Preocupação e da Ansiedade
Superb. A brilliant, thought-provoking message from one of our best writers. Thanks to Connor & Lelah!
Vim pela fundação bradesco
É nós kkkk
THE LAST SAPIEN another book to read
"even the chicken is more real than European Union"
Said the Israeli.
Wait... toward the end; "suffering" is reality?! Buddha said (although I didi not hear first hand) that there is a way to eliminate suffering - the four noble truth. Yuval Harari went to 45-day vipassana meditation. I did dozen of 10-day vipassana. If suffering is the most prominent form of what we face, would it not be the case to realize what Buddha/ vipassana points to? (Or is this the key message he is pointing to? - as may be discussed in his following books? I have a hunch...). May all beings be happy!
Fantastic Talk - Very Interesting Ideas!
Now that is something to think about. A chicken is more valuable to us than the USA (and any other country), EU, the WorldBank, Money, etc.
A chicken is more REAL than..
A chicken is more REAL than...
Je suis très frappé par le choix du critère de différentiation du réel et de la fiction énoncé par Yuval Harari : la souffrance.
La séparation entre le monte réel et le monde de la fiction réalisée par une de nos pire crainte : souffrir !
... C'est édifiant car ça marche !
Pour aller plus loin, j'aimerai noter les points suivants : le réel et la fiction définissent une frontière intéressante mais il en est une autre qui mérite notre attention.
Le monde réel dans une vision scientifique coïncide avec le monde tangible. En effet, est tangible ce qui est accessible aux sens (directement ou indirectement via des instruments qui relaient les sens humains).
Cependant, une question taraude depuis toujours l'esprit humain :
le monde réel se réduit-t-il au monde tangible ?
Autrement dit, existe-il des choses ou des êtres qui appartiennent au monde réel mais qui soient néanmoins intangibles ?
Cette question est généralement en dehors du domaine des investigations des scientifiques.
Elle est cependant l'objet de beaucoup de réflexions chez l'homme.
Pour avancer dans la réflexion, faisons un petit détours vers la pensée scientifique. Jusqu'à Heisenberg, la conviction que tout était intrinsèquement mesurable était profondément ancrée dans l'esprit des scientifiques. Les défauts où les impossibilités de mesure étaient attribuées à des incapacités pratiques ou techniques qui ne demandaient qu'à être résolues par le progrès. Il s'est avéré que cette conviction était fausse, c'est à dire que l'idée que nous nous faisions du réel était contraire à l'intuition : les choses sont intrinsèquement plus complexes car empreintes d'incertitudes interdépendantes. Le réel n’est pas conforme à notre intuition.
Personnellement je pense que réduire par principe le monde le réel à ce qui est tangible procède du même type d'intuition irrationnelle. On les qualifie habituellement d’a priori ou de parti pris. Cette intuition inspirée par l’époque moderne pourrait donc s'avérer tout aussi fausse que celle concernant la mesurabilité arbitrairement précise des quantité physiques.
Ce n'est pas parce que nous ne pouvons pas percevoir de façon tangible une chose qu'elle n'existe pas. C’est de la logique élémentaire. Maintenant il faut bien distinguer l’hypothèse de l'existence de l'intangible néanmoins réel de la pensée imaginative, conceptuelle ou mythique. J'accorde que cette distinction n'est pas très évidente mais elle a certainement un sens au moins dans le cadre de la logique.
Sous cette forme, le syllogisme défectueux est sans soute plus clair : tout ce qui est tangible est réel donc ce qui n'est pas tangible est fiction... ça coince n'est-ce pas ? c'est bien pourtant le raisonnement implicitement emprunté par ce show...
Je reviens maintenant au critère énoncé par Yuval Harari pour distinguer ce qui est réel de ce qui ne l'est pas. Dans l'expérience intuitive, cela sonne très juste et en même temps très humain. J'ai noté également qu'il rangeait dans la catégorie fiction et non pas dans le
monde réel les religions. J’en déduit que, contrairement aux personnes religieuses, il n’accorde pas à Dieu le statut même potentiel de réalité intangible. J'ai bien remarqué que dans sa présentation la personne du Christ était évoquée et que la croix apparaissait dans les images projetées à l’écran. Lors de l'évocation de la souffrance comme discriminant du réel et de l'imaginaire, j'ai été frappé par le fait que la croix est bien un l'instrument de torture donc est le symbole de la souffrance humaine.
Elle est infligée à un Juif pieux qui se dit être le messie et le verbe de Dieu, qui par sa souffrance établit une lien entre l'homme et Dieu.
Le Christ est-il au carrefour du monde réel et du monde imaginaire ou bien du monde réel tangible et du monde réel intangible ?
Plus profondément, je trouve très pertinent d'identifier la souffrance comme étant caractéristique du vécu humain réel. Je suis en revanche beaucoup plus réservé sur la distinction binaire entre le réel et fiction dans laquelle on rangerait sans ménagement
les religions avec l'invention de la monnaie et du code civil.
J'estime donc que l'anthropologie processuelle doit approcher ces sujets avec une certaine prudence.
La question du réel intangible n'est pas une question mineure et il est facile de montrer que l'on ne peut pas y répondre par la négative sans faire des entorses manifestes à des principes fondamentaux de la logique et de la démarche scientifique.
Pour les personnes ayant des convictions religieuses, l'analyse de Yuval Harari bien que brillante, ne semble pas d'une finesse suffisante pour pouvoir se permettre de classifier de façon presque désinvolte les religions dans le domaine des fictions. Il faut les classer dans le domaine des religions sans chercher à les faire rentrer au chausse pieds dans un cadre conceptuel au service d’une démonstration parmi d’autre. Je rappelle également que sur ce domaine la susceptibilité des intéressés est parfois explosive. Donc prudence…
Pour résumer mon opinion, ce n'est pas parce qu'une explication de ce type est brillante qu'elle doit dépasser le cadre de sa fonction : proposer des processus anthropologiques qui éclairent l'histoire de sapiens et non pas promouvoir implicitement une vision qui s'inspire fortement des philosophies modernes à priori athées qui identifient l'être à la matière.
Eric.
Ce que je comprend de votre intangible, c'est qu'il ne peux avoir aucune action sur les humains, sinon il deviendrai mesurable, et donc tangible. Je trouve qu'il n'y a qu'un intérêt à l'intangible, c'est de tenter de le rendre tangible.
Si ce n'est pas le cas, on ne peux utiliser que notre imagination pour définir l'intangible. Dans ce cadre, entre la croyance en un dieu, en de multiples dieux ou même en des licornes invisibles, je ne peux rien favoriser apriori, seulement m'interroger sur l'effet de ces croyances sur le monde tangible.
“We have become as gods-so we better get good at it!” Bucky Fuller ( so far it doesn’t look good😱)
Cuz there's only ONE God but let man continue to act as something we are not just sit back and watch the shit show
Amazing Lighting
To
Speaker And Fans
You are amazing Yuval Noah Hariri. I wish if people would get this idea, there had less hatred in the world.
I sense some Nietzsche in Harari's background, but he deviates in some way. One major deviation is his take on human "cooperation"....that we have done so much due to "cooperation" (a collectivist trope). I find Nietzsche's analysis more compelling, namely, that everything great in the history of humans, good or bad, has been due to a very teency tiny number of ultra-capable humans that created high points around which people did not cooperate, but fell into line like herd animals.
Human cooperation will work as democrazy currently "works". Yes, I feel the same Nietzsche's honesty in Harari.
I’m thinking of when crowds go to the beach, each person finds a space for themselves on the beach. They don’t fight over spaces. Or when peopl get on the bus. They use the vacant seats and the rest stand. I think this is what he means when he says sapient are naturally co,operative. Unless we are at ar of course.
OK I'm sorry but did he just say bees don't have a significant impact on the animal kingdom xD
Bumblebees
Genius pure genius professor harari
Muchas gracias
Thanks you😁
best talk ever.
A long talk about WHAT happened but sadly nothing about HOW it happened.
A lot of stories by this man.
Humanity is a collection of stories. What’s new?
''Even Chicken is more important than European Union'' very well-said Yuval Harari
A chicken is more REAL than ....
USI thanks for sharing this to us netizens. Harari's thinking is worth sharing
In 30.45 he says that the fictional effort about European construction is the reason why there is peace in Europe while in the past there is war.Well, in the past also, in prehistory also there where peaceful inspirations. attested indirectly by early writings if we read them in evolutionary perspective. But they did not grow to be peace movement then peace reality , effectively because they were not kept, saved, transmitted through time via writing, documentation....So there was war because there was not that kind of ubiquitous memory embodied in the writing, in the alphabet and the paper....Not?
Wow! I have just had my mind blown! Can it suffer??? So real and sad.
Imagination vs InFormation
My neighbours are a different species
I am glad you said that the Israeli "right" to own land between the Mediterranean and the Jordan river is a fiction
ALL rights are fiction. "Rights" are made-up by humans.
But he does not speak about all these leaders who profit from these fictions. Imagination in this context is manipulation.
O
He said there were 5 types of humans.. what about what separates modern homo sapians from them??? Anyway, Maybe it’s just me, maybe I’m missing something. Please enlighten me where I’m seeing this all wrong
Who are storytellers through the human history...are they the leaders or politician or humanitarian...?
¡Mente brillante!
Money is the biggest story..driving today's reality..Test of suffering seems to be the best method to bring humans to reality..
Tranks!!!!!
Nice Screens ...
100,000 years ago? He wasn't there, nobody was there.
Surpassing God
Surpassing Perfection
Surpassing SinLessNess
Everybody in the comment section agrees with him, and that must mean something.
Very nice
Harari in this book warns about the influence of artifical intelligence, which is known since the 10th century.
Ahmad Mohamad bin Hamad Al Ghazali -- a Persian Scientist, Philosopher, Mamathiciam, and religious Cleric, was the Dean of School of Nizamia in Baghdad- Iraq -- a very prestigious Faculty of the time, more famous than Harvard, Princeton, Oxford ..etc combined, after few years of teaching he did warn the society about the danger of scientific progress, invention, and application. He single handed did turn all scientific discovery of the time upside down and called it work of evil.
He quit his job and turned into Sofieisim--he did publish over 70 books in the course of his life, when one read his books then it become obvious where Harari got most of the ideas.
Scientific advances are morally neutral. Is RUclips evil? No, of course not but what you do with it can be.
You are evil cos you use youtube
sorry...dont get the connections you latch onto..
I dig what this dude is putting down. put him in charge of somthing!!!
In regards to the antitheistic undertones of this particular oration I concur completely but don't think for a second when there's a gun to my temple that I'm not pleading to God for my life .a Maxim I think even Yuval would adhere to .
This is very true ❤❤
Mind blowing 🤯
Brilliant!
That is why we are human beings and different from animals.
Why you on all his videos? There is absolutely no evidence for god, get lost.
We are mainly different from animals, because we created the capacity to destroy bigly and conquer our surrounding, and we did destroy bigly and conquered the world, and destroy it.
Different? We are animals...please tell me that you don't define yourself by your ability to destroy things?
Nah we're just animals with clothes and tools.
Good.
What’s USI? I wonder? Do the it’s by Yourself , selflessness to see by Yourself .
Repeating a lie often enough leads to people believe it is true. This is why Yuval uses the same phrases in all his talks.
UnExpected Sources Of InSpiration ... USI
Excellent speech!, but your idea of 'suffering' is also part of 'fiction' as you mentioned 'money', 'God', 'human right', 'nationalism', right?
¡Viva Cristo Rey!
a mountain does not suffer. Is that a fictional reality?
Very yes, and there are some other remarkable 'shortcuts' but it is a good idea to put the question of sufferance in the foreground.
Were religions consequently practising this they would be worth their 'money'. We would live nearly in a paradise by now.
You pretend you did not understand. Why? Or, better yet, do not tell me.
@@ancapad I do understand and I full agree with what he saying. I was just pointing out a definition flaw.
Man makes plans and God laughs.
The ability of us to cooperate flexibily in large numer is not unique in nature. The school of fishes or birds can did similar thing following the guidance of their leader. What is really amazing and make us the dominant force in the world is the fact ：we can be bonded strongly by the good storytellers. It is similar reason why we invest in the Tesla long time before it start making profits. Why do we trust strangers and are willingly to follow the storyteller. Possible explanation is we are the offspring of people that are willingly to trust the leader. Luckily the trust make our ancestor more coherent and whether some extremely bad enviromental pressure that our ancestral cousins can not get thrugh without confidence in their fellows and the future. The key of storystelling is the ability to depict a wonderous future and boost the confidence of people
An eye opener! Thanks Yuval for this clever and factual analysis of humanity! Also, quite scary, but we got to face reality!
This is manipulation not reality.
This is reality of which the likes of him sprung from.
"How Big Oil Conquered the World” - Corbettreport • 01/09/2016”
And "Why Big Oil Conquered the World"
Primates have 24 pair of chromosomes. Humans have 23 pair. Who did that?
Why do you assume a who? Until CRISPR cas 9 who was impossible. ;)
Paul Proudlock and moots
Systems of cooperation.
Climactic vs Anti-Climatic
today's desmond morris
Great work by great man
Fact: we are different only for the fact that we can destroy the planet earth just by timing a nuclear bomb...
Please don’t say that pandas are bears, please don’t say that pandas are bears, please don’t say that pandas are bears...ugh
Greatings to Yuval Harari, who claims to be animal...So cheers to the animals. I think that animals have no moral laws. Love one another, who has not broken this word in the world?
Yuval Harari MADNESS !!! WHY DO MAD PEOPLE WANT TO LEAD US, WHERE THEY WILL TAKE US??? WHY WE SHOULD LISTEN TO BLIND LEADERS. WE LIKE TO LISTEN TO FAIRY TALES WHEN WE REALLY KNOW THE TRUTH. EVERYTHING IS SO SIMPLE AND THIS ENDLESS THINKING AND EXCAVATION LEADS ONLY TO DARKNESS. CONFUSION! THE MORE WE KNOW AND ACHIEVE, THE GREATER DARKNESS WE GET, WE ARE DRIVING DEEPER AND DEEPER IN THE WATERS OF LOSTNESS. OUR WISE MAN -FOOLS, OUR EDUCATED - CHEATERS, OUR RICH - EXPLOITERS.... WHAT'S NEXT? A ROTTING WORLD AND ITS RISING ODOR... SHAME.
My opinions on scientific is the truth being to explain how everything’s different. The amazing things that I feeling in a lot of things for example, the Pyramids and the building of the ancestors did togetherness with world heritage that UNESCO respecting each building heritage. In the natural it’s amazingly for me as think about too many species in differences such as too many insects 🐜 for example, or too little too see through their wings flying, in the soils on the flowers 💐, how’s interestingly 😊.
When you talk about the truth being there’re always things with evidence , the logic and the reasons. How’s it being around with unbelievable views amazing me.
When you find out about what’s happening in the situation, it’s not just talking without referencing. It’s believable with increasing.
With the faith of God’s in my heart it’s sacrifices 🙏🏻, myself opening, I believe in humanity wisdoms and behave that leads me how’s ashamed for just thinking of yourself egos not to leave troubles to the other’s.
It’s my impressing time when I watched the video by the Russia President, said if’s you don’t help yourself, how’s God’s helps you.
The faith brings us together and should be happy 😃 and happy for we’re world brotherhood equality 😀.
Please talking with the truth in every way possible. How can you remember about what’s you said if’s you lies and you couldn’t tell the truth with no truth.
The loud obnoxious intro....why?
"Humans from.a different species".. 🤔🤔🤔
It isn't from East Africa but Horn of Africa, a country called Ethiopia.
Which is in East Africa. Just like Utah is in North America.
The commenter above me is correct. However, if you want to be more specific, Kenya has produced a significant number of human fossils, with Australothepicus anamensis being as old as 4.2 million years!
Ethiopia is in East Africa, don't be stupid.
il termine en disant:Nous devrions faire la différence entre les entités réelles et les entités fictives. Car très souvent, nous causons beaucoup de souffrances à des entités réelles et cela au service de entités fictives qui existent uniquement dans notre imaginaire!( en anglais:WE should make différence between réal entities and fictional entities. Because very often we cause many sufferings to real entities in the service of fictional entities that exist only in our imagination. )Mais attention : cela peut être de l' idéotechnologie couplée à de la phraséologie flottante. Car ces entités réelles vs entités fictives peuvent être :le luxe facilement acquis vs les idéaux de liberté et républiqueou(avec raison) la communauté humaine et l'environnement naturel vs le progrès technologique et la croissance économique.
Incrível!
Panda vs Polar
Beauty And Beast
Co-Operation vs Trust
Chicken Is More Real Than EU
The man without God. What a terrible mistake .
Nice dream.
All I Know
Is
I Know Nothing
'Reality' vs 'myth, necessary stories, fiction' in future course of history itself seems to me a contradicting idea 'according' to your discourse! What is the reality? Is there any reality? Reality itself is actually one of your stories, isn't it? Listening to your lecture, Nietsche kept telling me thus.
Thesis vs AntiThesis
So, mountains and oceans aren't real, because they can't suffer.
26:00 What do you think I am? Stupid? LOL