Mere silence is no Fraud (Explanation to Section-17) FRAUD | CONTRACT ACT 1872 (Part-2)

[@YogendraNirban]

Being a business law teacher , I found ur teaching style and matter is very effective ❤.. brillient

[@illusion5159]

Finally, I find a video who cover fraud in just 2 videos with no confusion.
Thank you ma'am.

[@savitachaudhary1301]

Your explanation 💯
Please make more videos related to law

[@dr.vaibhavpansare4896]

best explanation . very very usefull to understand the topic throughly

[@Abhilash.Pothen]

Very Well Explained..Thanks Mam

[@mrdeepakrana4433]

Thanku mam😍😍😍 love from jammu and kashmir 😍

[@nainasingh330]

Thank you di

[@ritikabhadani945]

Thank you mam for great explation..,

[@शिवगंगासागर]

Thanks superb

[@yasyas1868]

Ysss

[@vivoy53vivo32]

Thnku mam👌👌👌👌

[@SpartanFitnessMma1]

Step one medical recordsstep two pandemic step three vindicate yourself

[@jiassingh7521]

Well explained. Much grateful.

[@AmanGupta-iy2lj]

thank you so much

[@amitgautam4938]

crystal clear

[@tushartalwar12]

Could you please confirm why the concept of fiduciary relationship as explained in S. 17 was not applicable in the case of Kamal Kant v. Prakash Devi?

[@unique_me7445]

Well I feel that fiduciary relationship must not be included in this it must be just there in the undue influence i.e, sec 16 actually I asked my teacher n she said that ..

[@sanjukumarvadde5583]

Wonderful mam..✨😍..

[@anandshukla8149]

Thanks mam

[@shreyaupadhyay2425]

Mam i m going to give exm of cma inter i hv a qstn.. Do i need to learn all case laws name for cma exm ??

[@prashantkushwah3100]

Thanks 🙏

[@kushagragaur7414]

Loved it

[@ananyadubey4828]

ma'am in the previous video of Fraud, you said the seller has a duty to tell everything which is likely to affect the willingness of the buyer. But then how is mere silence no fraud. I'm very confused, when exactly is not telling the facts valid?

[@sadhikagupta1743]

Loved it!!