"Albus Severus Potter, you are named after two wizards, both who were murdered right in front of me while I was still a child. In fact, from my fourth year onward, my every year at Hogwarts was filled with murder and death and it was only luck that stopped me and everyone around me from dying in my first three years. Before that I was raised by my abusive aunt and uncle who beat me and forced me to live under the stairs. But don't worry about all that. Please, go on with your worries about how your childhood will be ruined if you're sorted into Slytherin."
Sergeant Johnson You'd think hogwarts would mount machine guns on the roof or something when they became aware of the impending invasion.... Oh look! A swam of idiots charging us! Let's mow them down....
Sergeant Johnson And now you're giving me flashbacks to that god-awful Harry Potter fanfiction "My Immortal" where they use guns instead of wands, everyone is a vampire-goth-satanist whose parents "committed suicide by slitting their wrists", and anyone who doesn't think that Gerard Way is the sexiest thing ever is a "prep" and worse than Hitler.
DashCat9 I know, right? Such complete BS. Just because you've heard a few random words in an obscure language you probably have never tried to learn even a few words of, doesn't mean you can string together even one coherent sentence and expect anyone (even a magic gate) to understand it. And it was even in the books. Frustrating.
***** You only need to speak one word, what you say doesn't have to make sense. Theoretically if someone with no knowledge of the language would say at least one word if they whisper long enough.
Pokemonfox4 I thought that one needs to say "Open" to the entrance to make it open up. That is definitely what I remember from the books, and the Harry Potter Wikia also confirms that. I mean, the gate would be pretty dysfunctional if any random hissing noise had a good chance of triggering it to open. What Ron was trying to do was essentially like knowing the letters that the language uses and trying to build random words out of them. The "monkeys banging on typewriters" analogy springs to mind.
How Voldemort should have hidden horcruxes: 1 - Throw in ocean. 2 - Sneak into McDonalds kitchen. (It'll either end up in a random person's house or a garbage heap) 3 - Chuck through a person's window. 4 - Throw onto a boat. 5 - Hide in long grass. 6 - Under a bunch of rocks. 7 - In sewer. BONUS - Turn a needle into a horcrux and drop in a haystack.
Crazy Jolteon Albus was a manipulative old man who kept a lot of secrets from Harry that could've helped him. Snape was an unapologetic abuser of his students simply because he couldn't get into Harry's mother's pants and then she died. Just because he went through some emotional trauma it shouldn't have affected his teaching duties.
I don't think he ever really wanted to teach, even tho he was good in that area. Slughorn's departure and him switching sides gave Dumbledore a reason to have him close. I think they planned for Harry's arrival early. And Snape's behavior had authenticity but also was staged (or exaggerated) because he would walk the finest of lines given Harry's connection to Voldemort.
2:32 in the previous movie, just after Bellatrix finishes torturing Hermione and she's like crying, you can see a hair fall onto her, and she watches it.
nothing could also be an emotional person (probably teenager), as magic can also derive from emotion. Remember back in book/movie 1 when harry made the glass disapepar? no wand. no incantation. Just emotion. He wasn't a pro. just emotional.
When I was in high school, I got into a fight with someone and everybody in campus gathered around to see it... But when Harry and Voldemort were having their epic wand battle, there was not a single soul watching it.... I don't think they know how schools work..
Yes! The book had such a nice pay-off. It was in the Great Hall, everybody was watching. Before Harry killed Voldemort, he explained to him exactly why he had failed in his plan. Then he killed him within a second. And there were all these people cheering, the first morning sunrays hit the scene... It was perfect. I was so pissed with this movie. I'm sure it was not a bad movie at all, it was just really dissapointing to me in so many moments. Also missing: Voldemort paralyzing Neville, placing the sorting hat on his head and putting it on fire. Why would Bellatrix, Nagini or Voldemort crumble and fall apart when being killed? Why would Voldemort ever use his hands to fight?
Considering how many tricks the twin actors played, including switching roles on set, I see Jeremy's point. In fact, the books make it seem like Harry can consistently and easily tell the twins apart, BEFORE George lost part of his ear. How?
Bleeters Seeing how she was born on April 19, 1990. She's been legally 'hot' since April 19, 2008. Which in the line of Harry Potter movies puts it around the recording of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince.
DriftKingNL "Legally hot"? Is that another horrible Legally Blonde sequel? Bleeters They (frickin' finally) declared her hot in the last video and also they sinned the fact that she didn't go topless in this one.
Something I noticed a few years ago: That scene where Professor McGonagall sends the Slytherins "to the dungeons" is actually not so dramatic when you remember that their common room is in the dungeons. So rather then it sounding like she is sending them to magic school-prison, actually this is the equivalent of sending them to their rooms lol
There was once this time in high school when the Harry Potter hype was still a thing and I remember this kid was avoiding spoilers from the first movie as he wanted to see both parts in one. Then another guy went up to him and whispered, "Dobby dies", and he flipped out. We didn't see him for weeks. Figured that was worth sharing.
Haedox I had a friend who skipped to the end of the sixth book to find out what happens (he didn't really care about HP) then he drove by borders where there was still a line outside and screamed out his window that Dumbledore dies.
I never argue Sins, but doesn't Harry literally say to Ron seconds before/after (can't remember), "they know the wand was stolen". Doesn't that answer the "why Hermione won't show her wand" question?
They also explain that Voldemort's name has a spell on it so that anyone who uses it gets tracked and that you can't disapperate into or out of Gringot's just in previous movies.
Chris Bir Actually, they only explain it in the deleted scenes. If you've not read the book, you have no way of understanding. (Why that was more expendable than the dancing scene, I'll never know.)
You are correct - the Ministry put a Taboo on the name, so whenever it was said, all protective enchantments are broken and whoever said the name can be taken in. However, this was never explained in the movies.
In the book it is explained that the tiara was protected with spells, so you couldn't use the Accio spell. I guess it was also immune from the requirement room
Elisa Risconti the books do not matter. If you have a movie that is entirely dependent on the books to answer all the questions the movie isn't doing a good job at movie-ing
Cactus Cow you are right, I also think that cause otherwise it doesn't make sense to make a movie. I just gave the information. I also don't like how Rowling explains things in the interviews or through questions by the fans. She was supposed to explain the rules/plot/characters clearly during the book.
You forgot the Cho Chang, who is a year older than Harry, is standing with the students, with her f`ing uniform on. I don`t know about you, but I`m pretty sure there is no such thing as an 8th year😣😣😣😣😣😣😣😈
@@Positivekitten I think they suspected that the goblins knew it had been stolen but weren't 100% certain. Plus in theory she should have been locked in Malfoy Manor with all the others who let Harry escape.
"My God, Voldemort just used a lot of his power and cracked his wand destroying our deadly force-field!" "Can't we just put it back up again?" "Nah, that's too easy"
MZG20 Well it took them long enough to arrive in the movie. At least a good 3/4 of the army would have been cut off considering it only took them about 20 secs to put it up
James Gibblesghotten Yes :). In some old strategy computer games, there was a simple defense trick: just dedicate some of your workers to constantly building walls and towers behind more walls and towers. They should have at least tried to use some wizards to just make force field bubbles inside force field bubbles, until V-t got magic arm/tongue muscle cramps destroying them.
Another sin. Voldemort is pretty fond of the Avada Kedavra curse, yet somehow doesn't use it on Snape, for no purpose other than to make it possible for Harry to collect his tears.
Rasus The Fuckface There is a legitimate reason for that: the wand's owner cannot be killed by their own wand. So since Voldemort believes Snape owns the Elder Wand, he resorts to slitting his throat and letting Nagini finish him instead. As for Harry, since he now believes he is the master, he uses AK, only to destroy the Horcrux part leaving Harry intact and in Limbo.
You've seen the Lego HP in 90 seconds? I loved that! Harry: Well 8 films, and a stage play. What next? Hermione: (Reading Fantastic beasts} I think they should make a film series based on this text book!
He's riding a high right now. He's pretty much won at this point since his nemesis for 17 years is dead. He's pretty much gloating by letting Neville say his bit.
It *Was,* Idiot! The Book - Not so much the movie - has Harry himself explain to Voldemort that when he, Harry, sacrificed himself, Lily's protective magic protected everyone!!
I’m not surprised CinemaSins doesn’t understand....the movies do a terrible job of explaining that whole concept or why it matters in the Battle of Hogwarts. The movies leave out or skip over so much that they can be borderline incoherent if you’ve not already read the books. And that’s just crappy filmmaking
to anyone who don't get it, harry in the book let him avada himself to protect everyone from voldemort and his deatheaters, but I'm not sure how does it makes sense considering how it had affected harry
Exactly, Cinema Sins have never taken time to try to understand what some of these things means. Like about how he would never understand why snape put the sword in lestranges vault. Also he doesn’t understand the non verbal spells and the use of wands and how they are a way to transfer magic. It’s annoying when people have no clue what they talk about
What I've always wondered is do Bullets work on Wizards. I mean that scene in the woods what if you had a bunch of snipers just shoot at Voldemort and their minions, would they dodge it? would they instantly be protected? are they bullet proof? something that I've always wondered about
JaxBlade In the books, its kinda assumed that wizards could just block the bullets, but I think in real life, bullets could work if they didn't suspect them. But, it would probably be easy to cure bullet wounds...
The Zecromancer I don't think you could do any kind of spell before a bullet would reach them at close range, like in the last fight scene Voldemort could have pulled a gun on harry and harry couldn't do shit to stop it, boom end of movie Voldemort wins.
The Zecromancer I don't think you could do any kind of spell before a bullet would reach them at close range, like in the last fight scene Voldemort could have pulled a gun on harry and harry couldn't do shit to stop it, boom end of movie Voldemort wins.
The Zecromancer i vaguely remember a character (probably Mr. Weasley) mention the muggles having 'silver wands' that they point at people then die, so given their knowledge of rubber ducks, I'd doubt the most they'd know is 'that thing is bad' Although, given the intelligence of the villains in this series, they'd probably think a muggle couldn't hurt them and then get shot whilst laughing or something
Something that bothers me here and it is when he sins Hermione for getting the Bellatrix hair. There is a specific scene in part one that shows the hair float to her and it's not even that subtle. The scene is basically saying, "HEY, THIS IS IMPORTANT AND YOU SHOULD PROBABLY REMEMBER THIS FOR LATER." Don't get me wrong, I love CinemaSins, but this is just plain lazy.
I agree, but I must add that I've seen this movie 1000 times and it wasn't until the 1001 time viewing this movie that I actually saw the hair scene, they probably just overlooked it, they are human, but that is a sin lol
DarylAndrea Yeah, I agree with you. They are human, but since their channel is all about nit picking I thought I would call them out on it since the movies did account for it :P
Albus Severus Voldemort Hagrid Draco Mcgonagall Gryffindor Quddictch Seeker Granger Weasly Potter Jr. That right there sums up everything about harry potter and thats also the new name of his son because..i said so
Albus Severus Rubeus Draco Godric Cedric Dean Thomas Griphook Neville REMUS Potter Jr. Because what about poor Moony? Harry names his kids after his dad, his godfather, his headmaster/mentor/grandfather-figure, and the fucking potions master that loved his mom? ok i get naming a kid after snape, but you'd think the mentor/uncle?-figure/man who made you his own kid's freaking godfather! would get priority. Couldn't JK have given them a another kid named like Arthur Remus, or Rubeus Remus, or idk, Dobby Remus? Dobby Remus Potter. Has a nice ring to it actually. Also, Lily Luna, named after his mom and... a friend that was kind of helpful? and happens to still be alive, making her the only one to be named after a living person, which is fine, there aren't really a lot of dead women in Harry's life, but she could have been Lily Nymphadora? no nvm that's sounds dumb. If we're going with living people then what it SHOULD have been was Lily Molly, or even Lily Minerva. Hell "Minerva" is a nice echo of "Ginevra" so if JK wanted to have a Lily Luna, why couldn't she make a Minerva Molly too? They could even call her "Minny" Ok, new official canon, Harry and Ginny had five kids: James Sirius, Albus Severus, Lily Luna, Dobby Remus and Minerva Molly.
Mike Cornell do you even know what kind of images I have in my head because of the books xD I read them in finnish, so translation might be little off, but harry is in 7th book like "are you saying that voldemort is hiding behind a dumpster and waiting that he could jump out and knock me out cold" or something xD oh dear.
+Skyebright1 Nope. According to the chapter 30 of the last book no student in Slytherin helped Harry fight the Voldemort and his minions. There were few from Ravenclaw, a dozen or so from Hufflepuff and a half from Griffindor.
Arko777777 If I was in that position and I knew my family and friends were fighting, I would rather go down to the dungeons and do nothing than risk getting them in more trouble
Sinning Cinema Sins for sinning thew idea that a Horcrux can't be made out of a living thing after we have established that the snake, a living thing, is a Horcrux.
they didnt say it CAN'T be made out of a living thing, they are saying it shouldn't have HAD to latch on to a living thing when his spell went off, as Dumbledore CLEARLY implied. Meaning it could have easily latched onto anything from Harry's room. A book, a piece of paper etc... Even then you could prolly ignore that by saying something like "oh well he used a spell on a living person, thus the spell rebounding would obviously attach to a living thing if possible."
Eh not really. The room of requirement was supposed to be a room that its interior would suit the needs of the person about to enter. For example dumbledore once really needed to go to the bathroom and came across it, or in half blood prince harry and ginny really needed a room to hide the book. That room became the "lost and forgotten" room. Sure its very likely that some people dumped their old brooms there, but 3 convenient brooms conveniently placed next to them when they needed them the most? No thats just some plot device bullshit, otherwise the diadem should had been in front of harry as soon as he steps in, or like cinemasins has said multiple times why is there any conflict in the magic world when (and if) a room like that exists?
Actually, it should be more sinned, but not for geeking out. Powerful spells require practice. There is no way McGonagall used it for the first time then and there.
@@Merlin7 she's an incredible witch especially when it comes to transfiguration/charms. I don't think she'd need practice, even for a spell that is that grand.
@@Merlin7 prof mcgonagall was a master of transfiguration( she was the teacher too) she was the one who brought the giant chess pieces to life in the sorcercer's/philosopher's stone too.
@@shihoinyoruich3780 I've read the books over a dozen times. I know them by heart. Every professor at Hogwarts would have been taught security procedures and basic spells when they were hired. They would have practiced them that year. It's ridiculous to think otherwise.
The sword isn't magic, okay it is enchanted to be able to appear out of nowhere, but it is not stronger or better than any other muggle-sword. "The question of why a wizard would need a sword, though often asked, is easily answered. In the days before the International Statute of Secrecy, when wizards mingled freely with Muggles, they would use swords to defend themselves just as often as wands. Indeed, it was considered unsporting to use a wand against a Muggle sword (which is not to say it was never done). Many gifted wizards were also accomplished duellists in the conventional sense, Gryffindor among them."
The sword absord all the upgrades, that's the reason the sword can destroy an horcrux. This is an overpower sword final point. J.K Rolling like Tolkien doesn't know how to write without Deus Ex Machina.
I hated how Professor Mcgonagall sent all the Slytherins into the dungeon just because Pansy told someone to get Harry. What if some Slytherins wanted to fight against Voldemort but they weren't given the chance to prove that not all Slytherins are bad?
My girlfriend actually made a good point about putting the Slytherins in the dungeon (not that the filmmakers were thinking this, but still): regardless of how you feel about Slytherin, it's an objective fact that a *lot* of them have Death Eater parents. That doesn't mean that the kids are evil, but do you really want to force them to choose between trying to kill their dad or being labeled a coward for not fighting?
Considering several Slytherin children had relatives and parents and friends fighting alongside Voldemort, it was mostly to protect the children themselves.
Not to be that person that's like "WELL IN THE BOOK", but once people realize that Voldemort is coming to Hogwarts all the students are woken up and gather at their house tables in the Great Hall. Professor McGonagall makes an announcement about evacuations and about staying, if you're of age, to fight against the Death Eaters and Voldemort. So most of the students evacuate but there are still groups that stay behind from gryffindor, hufflepuff, and ravenclaw because they're old enough. BUT. THE ENTIRE SLYTHERIN TABLE IS ABANDONED. So I totally get how you're saying that she should have given some Slytherins the chance to prove that not all of them are bad, but all of them were bad or taught that they were bad because THEY ALL LEFT to go join the death eaters or their parents to be on the bad side lol.
I am currently watching through all of CS's videos This is the best Sentence ending (that does not include bonus rounds). Best "sentence", anyway. By far
Wow, you're pretty defensive Dusk. Don't assume anything about anyone else. They make valid points that I agree with and I love all their videos. I just grew up with Harry Potter and it's weird to have all the mistakes pointed out that I never noticed. Relax.
+Rainydaywriter23 Nah, it's totally okay. No matter what other people say - everybody will feel defensive at some point watching cinemasins. That just how people work - we get defensive when things we love get questioned, criticised and ridiculed.
If I were Harry, at the end of the battle, before cracking the wand I would used it to repair the entire Howarts, or at least the bridge or Hagrid's hut
It is a poorly written movie. That was the point of my comment. A movie version of a book is always horrible by comparison. The source matters. The source always matters. So yes the books matter. If you can say they don't obviously you're just a troll, and I shouldn't be wasting my time talking to you.
2:33 If you payed attention, in part 1 before they showed the engraved “mudblood” on poor Hermione, you can see her tracking Bella’s hair as it falls on her upper arm.
Before breaking it? He never breaks the wand in the book! He keeps it back in Dumbledore's grave so that when Harry would die, the Elder Wand wouldn't have an owner, hence it's power would be insignificant
Ethan Joe and Chris Ayers we are talking abaut the movie, how they not including the plot line of the book in which Harry fixes his broken wand whit the wand of dumbledore.
Harry Potter movies in a nutshell: Sorcerers Stone - cute 11 year olds in wizard school Chamber of secrets - scary pipe in the bathroom leads to certain death but 12 year olds are able to get in somehow (hogwarts how many lawsuits do you have) Prisoner of askaban - time travel and just kinda wack but we here for it Goblet of fire - stop fighting with ron harry Order of the Phoenix - Harry’s one chance of having a god father must die of course Half blood prince - let’s finally get to the climax of this story and kill another one of the beloved characters DH part 1 - harry x Hermione DH part 2 - world is obviously going to be saved since this is the last movie, time to bring out the innocence of all the-so called evil characters
JK Rawling has said many times that scene involvingv Hagrid carrying "dead" Harry into Hogwarts, was the first scene she envisioned when she started writing Harry Potter books. Since it was Hagrid who brought Harry into wizard world, it was very logical that he also brings him back into it. She has also said many times that the only character she knew would survive the end for sure was Hagrid for exactly that purpose.
Miroslav Tomic It has been stated in the books that Hagrid had a resistance to magic because of his giant blood. They probably tried killing him, but it failed.
Sin 52: Here's how I like to label thd Hogwarts houses... Gryffendor: The Special Snowflakes Ravenclaw: At Least We're Not Hufflepuff Hufflepuff: Cannon Fodder Slytherin: You Are Eleven Years Old and We've Already Decided You're Evil
2:55 The reason they are being asked for Bellatrix's wand in the first place is because it is known to be stolen. Presenting Bellatrix's wand here, to goblins who've been briefed to look out for it, is tantamount to saying, 'Please arrest us immediately. And while we're talking, I'd like my room in Azkaban to have a sea view, regular bread and water, with hot and cold running Dementors, please.' Overconfident sinning is overconfident.
Then why doesn't Hermoine as Bellatrix immediately reply "my wand was stolen". You might say they she didn't know it was stolen but if that's the case then why didn't she present it?
The movie doesn't do a good job at explaining that though. What's more, even in-book it's not that solid, because if someone was going to impersonate Bellatrix, they'd likely try to do a good job of it, and the real Bellatrix wouldn't present her wand to a goblin, or anyone aside from Voldemort really.
Elijah Talmud yes thank you! I'm all for naming a child after someone you loved (for example when I have a daughter I am naming her Nora after my grandmother whom I loved) but there are some names you just don't do and that is one of them. His second kid James was a little better since James is a better name than Albus
Elijah Talmud They mean you spelled it wrong. It's Severus (it's latin), and the name was also in the books, so the movie isn't writing fan fiction in this particular case. Now you can hate the name, some book readers do too.
Oh no, I knew that they were getting at. It was a typo I didn't care to correct. And it appears you misunderstood what I was getting at. That name is absolutely cringeworthy and sounds like something a teenage girl scribbled on her tumblr.
Will Tenenbaum i think he doesn't understand the whole thing completely since he is talking about the fourth movie where Voldemort is brought back to full form using Harry's blood, Peters hand and one of his fathers bones. they wouldn't need to find the sand piece, just whatever living thing your soul is now clinging to for life (like what happened to the first defense against the dark arts teacher in the first movie)
Also, when Ron said "if we did for them Harry, I'm going to kill you!" Let's just take you back to the first movie when Ron said "sort out her priorities!"
Since I had to leave about 50 comments for the previous HP video, here is a list of all of my comments: -Dumbledore said that there was no spell or enchantment to bring people (or anything, for that matter) back to life. -The sword is impregnated with Basilisk venom, making it a powerful weapon. Need I explain further? -You can still USE wands from others, but the magic won't be as powerful. -The dragon is blind and couldn't feel them. -They said You-Know-Who because the word 'Voldemort' was cursed so that Death Eaters would find you when you say it. -SLYTHERIN IS NOT FUCKING EVIL. IT'S THE HOUSE OF AMBITION AND CUNNING. NOT EVIL. -Ron copied what Harry said for the locket to open. -The Elder Wand worked like a normal wand. If he unlocked its full power, then it would be THE most powerful wand in history. -In the book, both Harry and Lily's eyes were green and almond-shaped. Fuck movies for changing appearances, eh? -YOU SAYIN' DAT NAGINI AIN'T LIVIN'? * ahem * Are you saying that Nagini wasn't living? SNAKES ARE LIVING, SENTIENT BEINGS THANK YOU VERY MUCH. Horcruxes usually aren't assigned to living things because they're very hard to... Well, you know. -It's 'the power of love' or some sloppy cliche thing like that which saved Harry. Not a fucking spell. I saved you from having to scroll through 394 comments. You're welcome.
Sky Dayer Even if some of them were only in the books, people should still read the books first. Movies are an addon to the book; not a standalone copy.
GrimSleeper Peter Pettigrew. PETER. FUCKING. PETTIGREW. Oh, so it's not evil to be a Death Eater and betray your best friends by fucking causing their deaths? And Snape was not evil. And Merlin was the greatest wizard of all time. And Salazar Slytherin wasn't evil either. Draco is not evil. Plenty of Slytherins aren't evil, and plenty of non-Slytherins are evil.
if the movies represent the books they should have hit all the key plot points and there would have been no plot holes but the wand points will always have plot holes
Do you want to know the biggest problem with Harry Potter and the deathly hallows part 2... They are too dark for you to even see half of what's happening 😂
then you either need your eyes tested or to adjust the settings on your tv... looks perfectly fine to me whenever I watch it, I never have trouble making anything out.
@Kevin Sundelin Nope, Snape just left Harry there. Sirius showed up and was the one who took Harry outside. He lent Hagrid his bike and gave him Harry, then went to hunt down Pettigrew.
(I didn't read the book). I would argue that it was a matter of priorities. Snape cared about Lily. As far as he's concerned, Harry (or everything else) was not important. Some people just don't care to get involved. Just 2 months ago, there was a security footage of 2 old women (60ish) being attacked with a cinder block at their own liquor store. And you can see a customer sneaking away while the women were being attacked. That was not the first time something like that happens. And it won't be the last. Some people just don't care enough to get involved. Now that I think about it. It's also possible that Snape didn't want people to know he helps. He was a part of Voldermort's posse. He can't let it get out that he helped Harry. ruclips.net/video/5NiGW3-xBwI/видео.html
@@elsonlam okay but that's grown women who could maybe take care of themselves until help got there or was called or something. Even people who claim to not like other people would say you're on your own to them would usually not leave a little baby by themselves to possibly die like that. And we know Snape is somehow good at least a little bit and cared about Lily. So it really is bullshit that he just ignored the crying baby. completely. I
@@mariahdibben4066 But you're talking about complete strangers. If Voldermort finds out Snape helps, it wouldn't end well for him. Another thing to consider is that Snape loved Lily. Her lifeless body could have devastating effect on him that he momentary makes bad decisions. For him, at that time, nothing means anything.
@@alwaysseverus741 I don't remember any such rules about having to know how to make the stuff inside it. Hogwarts probably wouldn't allow a portkey off the premises, but I see no reason it wouldn't allow one to the outside of the room of requirement
@@SomeNiceMovies, unfortunately, they'd need permission from the MoM to create a portkey and then it would take a while to actually create said portkey. However, considering the emergency and the state of the MoM, an exception could be made for the permission issue. There's really no working around how long it takes to create one. Hmmm. It's a bit of a puzzle there.
kinda funny. Hermiones parents thought they were someone else (fake names cant remember) yet they got to australia of all places with what passports Xd
That would alter the laws of time. She deleted the memory so the paintings never happened if there is spell to regain the memory then that would be heavily overpowered.
She used a mind spell on her parents to make their memories of her unaccessable, but after Voldemort was gone, she tracked them down and destroyed that barrier. The pictures changing you see in the movie are just an effect so that you can actually see what she's doing. She really didn't need to change them in the books as there she said that she gave her parents fake identities and sent them to Australia.
From the books: The room only opens if you need it AND it contains exactly what you need inside it, except for edible stuff. But this is cinemasins, not booksins, so: "The books don't matter"
@@dogsdreamtoo8427 No one on Earth was suggesting that, so clearly *you* connected the idea of The Real Slim Shadow knowing his name, and The Real Slim Shadow being smart.
That might be true but I think the reason she didn't present the wand because Bellatrix would never do something like that. The bitch was really pompous.
That's not why Hermione didn't show the wand. Otherwise she wouldn't have brought Bellatrix's wand with her to the bank, which she did. But yes, you are correct that that's the LOGICAL reason for her not to do it, but alas these movies are not logical at all.
I don't know, I watched it the other day, and I never heard them say that they can't say Voldemort. They just swapped back to calling him You Know Who. And a movie based on a book that's split into two parts (especially since the 7th book isn't that large) really shouldn't leave out details expecting you to have read the book. If any of the movies should've been split into two parts, it was the 5th. That book was fucking enormous.
Blindness makes it incapable of feeling people riding it? Or maybe you mean the previous sequence where the dragonfire should have superheated the whole area and cooked everyone regardless if the dragon was aiming at them?
+Dóbby Zabina Only because Crabbe wasn't even in the film. The actor got done for drugs or something, hence why he doesn't appear in the last 3 or so films
+elijah ”Bulbamew” handley He was selling marijana and used it. I already know that. Since it happened.. But the thing is, why change the death of someone else, when J.K Rowling has been confiming that Goyle has kids 19 years in the future... They changed Dumbledore after second movie, since the first actor died. They could have done the same with Crabbe. It just mess up everything.
Dóbby Zabina Probably just because Crabbe and Goyle weren't major characters. Rowling was part of the writing of the final films, she would have changed it if she disagreed so she obviously wasn't too bothered about Goyle dying instead
Nicholas Truman nope the scene where they’re in malfoy’s manor and bellatrix tortures hermione is in the 7th movie and the 8th movie starts with them brewing the potion. So I do think it’s u reasonable to remember one strand of fucking hair fall to hermione we were too busy being hurt by her screams NO I WONT SHUT UP
@@kristen1684 The hair fell on her while Bellatrix was busy scolding the other Death Eaters. This was the perfect opportunity for Hermione to tuck the hair in a pocket or something, and she exploited said opportunity.
For everyone arguing about books The books don't matter because the movie does a poor job of translating or explaining things compared to the book so the movie deserves to be sinned, he's not sinning the books
The people who made the movies should just actually read the books instead of having them vaguely described while on crack, because i could have made these movies 100000 times better than this disrespecful pile of shit of a series. And yeah i did read the books hundreds of times as a kid
Um no you couldn’t...the movie received a 96% from critics most of which didn’t read the books. If you think you could make a better movie than one of the highest rated movies in history without any experience, you must not have very many brain cells
Even the books aren't immune. Rowling should not have included devices like Time Turner or the Liquid Luck. Those raises more questions than resolves conflict.
Just rewatched the movies and realized how terribly made 7 and 8 were, how much they depended on you knowing the books. Like when he sinned the "why are they afraid to say voldemort's name" thing, i was like "duh, because they made it Taboo and whenever you say it it summons death eaters/snatchers....which....they "showed" in the movie (you can see it happen every time someone says the name) but never actually explained....." And just more and more moments that you fill in the gaps on your own if you read the books. I still don't know why people like any of the movies after the first 2. And the "Lily's eyes" thing made me so mad!!!
I love you cinema sins, but your harry potter sins videos really irritate me because a lot of the sins you give are for things that have been explained in previous movies. For example, it's been explained that you can't use magic to bring people from the dead (as to why they couldn't bring dobby back) - this isn't the vampire diaries - and that you can't use the Imperius curse willy nilly because it's an Unforgivable Curse, as explained in goblet of fire. Check the canon first please
Tesslyn Francis The problem is -- and the reason the sin was given -- is that the rules are never properly explained or justified. Rules will just pop up and vanish when the plot needs them to. One moment you can do X, the next you can only do X if you Y. Why? No reason. Just because. Unforgivable Curse? You can use it this time. Why? Because you really want to. Instant transportation across the world like you did last time? Nah. Why? Tension! Magic that causes instant death? Sure. Magic that reverses that? Nah. Why? Just because.
Matilda Persson Maybe of you're confused about it cause you haven't read the books. The laws on magic are well fleshed out in the books. To clarify though: Harry couldn't use an unforgivable curse any other time because it's illegal. In this movie, he was already on the run in any case so why not use an unforgivable curse. In your defence though, the movies are very unclear. If they had followed the books, you'd be a bit more clear on the lore
Tesslyn Francis Harry broke the law because he was on the run. At the end, he is no longer on the run. So he will be arrested and sent to prison for life, right? That's the punishment the book tells us is due.
Tesslyn Francis That is exactly one of the stupid rules. Ok. It is the "Unforgivable Curse", so it is like a tax fraud. Ok. How does ANYONE other than the people with Harry know he used it ? Why he does not get arrested for using it ? WHY can't you use magic to revive dead ? WHY...WHY...WHY ?
Tesslyn Francis Most of the sins were things that had been explained in the books, but not in the films, so I'd say that overall the film still had a hella lot of sins. These videos are meant to be comedy, anyway. About 4/5 sins at any one time are actually proper gripes.
Let's list all sins that wouldn't be sins in the books because there they were explained? Sure, why not? *I know CinemaSins doesn't care about books and I agree those things were problems in the movies, just pointing out how much better explained the books are*: *Sin 12*: Pretending to put the sword in the vault was Snape and Dumbledore's idea, not Voldemort's; Bellatrix didn't give a damn about the sword, but she did care about the mysterious object that Voldemort had explicitly told her to protect with her life. *Sin 13*: Harry used Hermione's, to a very poor effect (couldn't control spell intensity, some spells would just not happen or do their opposite effect etc.), which kinda explains why people don't use other people's wands if given a choice; meanwhile, in between the second and third book, Ron *did* get a new wand when his broke, one that just so happened to be much better for him because it actually chose him instead of being a hand-me-down from his brother like his original; as for needing wands, it's explained that it just helps casting magic a lot. *Sin 19*: They present the wand in the books, and it doesn't work out at all: in the time it took them to get the plan ready Bellatrix had already made it known that her wand had been stolen and she was using a new one, so Harry had to use the Imperio Curse to fix that fuckup; apparently in the movie they made them a little smarter and made them realize that people might know they robbed a famous house a month ago. *Sin 20*: In the books it's shown that he doesn't, that's why the spell breaking waterfall was even activated in the first place: he let them walk in the bank and went to call for security, since it would be theoretically easier to catch them in there but well, dragon. *Sin 21*: Harry had been shown to struggle with the idea of using an Unforgivable Curse, even for good ends; the only time prior to this one he had used one was when he failed to torture and kill Bellatrix when she killed Sirius, and he only used the Imperio here as a last ditch effort (although the movie's change from the last sin made it look like it was his plan all along, which makes things lose all sense) *Sin 26*: The last defense wasn't the Gemino curse, but the Flagrate one, and the door's automatic shutdown: instead of things multiplying, things were multiplying, the clones were boiling hot and the door was closed behind you, so you'd quickly be smashed by a huge wave of burning hot things; it would have been pretty fatal if not for the goblin they had to re-open the door. *Sin 27*: In the books he realizes it would be physically impossible to climb a pile that is triplicating it's size every second you spend climbing it, and just has Hermione or Ron (can't remember which) levitate him so he can grab the horcrux. Remember kids, it's Levi*o*sa, not Liviosaaa. *Sin 28*: The protection against stuff like Accio, apparating, and stuff like that is already a part of the whole Bank of Gringots; the murdery ones were covered by the mentioned crushing and burning spells. *Sin 29*: As I just said above, in the books Apparating in Gringots is physically impossible, same like in Hogwarts. *Sin 31*: The key word is "little" just before humans: the scale that is given to that dragon in the books makes it sound more like they were 3 mosquitoes landed on a human than 3 people sitting on the back of an elephant. In the books the dragon didn't even notice there was somebody on him. *Sin 35*: Saying "Voldemort" by this time triggered a spell made in the MM that immediately revealed the person's who'd say it location and break any protective spells around them, which was exactly how they got caught and brought to Malfoy Manor in the books. *Sin 37*: In the books there is an overwhelming feeling of desperation by the trio because they don't see any of their plans as successes: the plan never goes right, but they just fix everything quickly on spot (for example, the Gringots plan was to get the Horcrux and leave through the front door like if nothing had happened, not blasting through the ceiling on a dragon), which is why Harry finally has enough and goes "we always plan and then nothing happens as we expected and we have to just deal with shit, so why don't we cut the bullshit, go there just with our wits and deal with shit already?" *Sin 38*: They use a spell to dry the clothes, which is smart and makes sense in a magic world, but denies male loving audience some Daniel and Rupert action; on the other hand, it doesn't leave female loving audience longing for some Emma undressing, so you know, balance? *Sin 43*: It wasn't the painting who dug the tunnel, but the Room of Requirement. The room's powers are underused because of the weird way it works, which Neville spent his 7th year decoding and getting used to, which is why *he* was able to use it to a far greater extent than anyone else, doing stuff like making it dig a tunnel to Hogsmead. *Sin 44*: The room works like a separate dimension, which is why you can hold a Metallica concert in there and people pressing their ears against the wall wouldn't hear a whisper. *Sin 53*: Hogwarts never needed protection ._. *Sin 59*: Riddle didn't approach the Grey Lady asking to destroy the Diadem, instead he used his sexy charm with her until she felt like he was a friend, at which point she gave him the Diadem because she thought it would help him. *Sin 62*: Ron says in the books that he wanted Hermione to kill that Horcrux because it was only fair: she was basically the single reason they were still alive, and she still hadn't got to kill a Horcrux. It's sorta fair. *Sin 65*: They have, for example the curse Peter uses when he is incriminating Sirius, which kills a lot of people at once; it's just that nobody ever went through the trouble of perfecting it into a formal spell, meaning that anyone who wants to use that would pretty much need to come up with a spell on his own, which not everyone has the brains for. *Sin 74*: In the books either Crabbe or Goyle are too dull to remember that Voldemort wants Harry alive, and so they do try using killing curses, which makes Ron go berserk. *Sin 78*: The moment the doors lock the room, altogether with everything else in it, stop existing immediately. Woe to the poor fucker who next tries to use the hiding storage version of the Room. *Sin 82*: Voldemort went in too deep into Harry's mind and found out that doing that brought his conscience dangerously close to Lilly's protective curse, which almost killed him and hurt like the motherfucking hell; Harry only felt a small bit of the pain through the connection and it was strong enough for him to beg for death, just to stop it. After that happened in Book 5, Voldemort got way too scared of using his connection with Harry, afraid that if he kept messing with the link Harry could possibly trigger that reaction again, so he started protecting his mind from Harry's, effectively shutting the connection, except for moments when Voldemort felt such intense emotions that his Occlumency control would slip. *Sin 83*: Actually, that's pretty much it: they really don't have any spells against giants xD Sure, some 40 people casting Avada Kedavra at once might make one faint or maybe even die if you're luck, but they are just 3. *Sin 87*: Voldemort was experiencing the same problems with the Elder Wand Harry did with Hermione's. Sure, 9 out of 10 spells might come out almost as they were meant to, but the moment you are in a duel and one of your spells simply decides not to come out, you'd be dead. You don't bring a rifle filled with random blanks and real bullets to a war, and you don't bring a non-obeying wand to a wizard war. *Sin 88*: He didn't kill Snape, he used a weaker curse to immobilize him and had Nagini do it, which is proof enough of how scared he was of going into battle without conquering the wand: he didn't trust it to kill Snape, instead using a far easier spell that had a much smaller chance of backfiring. *Sin 91*: Voldemort gave him and ultimatum and a time limit, so he wandered around while there was still time. *Sin 95*: In the books both of them had green eyes; why the fuck the films didn't do the minimum effort of at the very least casting a girl with blue eyes to match Danniel's (since he was allergic to contacts) is beyond me. *Sin 97*: Better safe than sorry. It's not like that was his whole plan, murdering Harry was just another thing on his bucket list. If the prophecy was wrong, who gives a fuck, 3 more bodies to the toll; if it was right, yay?
*continuing* *Sin 99*: So that Harry wouldn't kill himself to break the Horcrux before finding and killing the other Horcruxes. Dumbledore was a dick to Harrys. *Sin 100*: Dumbledore gave Snape a signal to watch for: when Voldemort suddenly became paranoid about Nagini's safety, since he figured out this would only happen when Voldemort realized his other Horcruxes were being hunted. Snape didn't have things set up because he only realized Voldemort was showing the sign he should look for when he arrived at the cottage, at which point it was too late for him to do anything. *Sin 101*: the Horcrux making spell is done before, not after. You have to set it up so you can capture your soul piece when it breaks off. Voldemort's soul was ready to become an Horcrux, but suddenly the main part of his soul was gone and it didn't have any way to channel into an object, so it latched on to Harry; also, about every Horcrux being an inanimate object, Nagini. *Sin 102*: The spell Lilly "used" literally required human spontaneous sacrifice, it would be impossible to recreate before the battle; Harry eventually casts the same spell when he gives his life, which is why nobody else dies in the battle after Voldemort kills him. *Sin 104*: It actually does; in the 6th book the power of female boners had already turned Tonk's patronus into a Werewolf =p it sorta makes sense since so many people associate their significant others with a feeling of happiness and safety, and that is literally the emotions the patronuses are made out of. Which means it's utter bullshit Harry's being a stag, since it was one way before he knew his father could metamorph into one but hey, we're not sinning the Prisoner of Azkaban here! *Sin 105*: It took so long because of their caution: in the books Snape is only able to do that because, after months running around, Hermione finally gets a bit careless and lets slip the place where they are, which the Sirus' Great Grandpa's portrait (loooong story) hears and snitches to Snape. *Sin 114*: for some reason, the movies forgot that Harry should have been using the Invisibility Cloak at this point; the worst thing is, even though it may seem like an insignificant plot change, it's not: the fact that Harry had the Cloak and the Stone with him when he died and was the owner of the Wand by right of conquest is *the whole reason why he is able to come back from the dead in the first place*. Shame on you, movie. Shame! *Sin 120*: it's implied that they don't, but God is still racist in that universe because he allows wizards to come back as ghosts if they want to, and not muggles; although to be fair, becoming a ghost is sort of a horrible deal that most ghosts deeply regret because it's a miserable and eternal experience with no chance of escape, so HP God is justa dick to everybody! *Sin 122*: Harry is literally Master of Death at this point. He could have the souls of every woman who was ever top dancer at the Moulin Rouge show up and do a cancan for him if he so damn wanted; instead the thing he desired the most was confronting Dumbledore and asking him what the fuck was up with that sadistic plan. Priorities. *Sin 126*: First, that Limbo isn't somewhere Harry was put for being special, it's been established since Book 5 that all dead wizards go there, where they chose between dying or becoming ghosts. Second, as I said before, the books have the whole Master of Death subplot going on at this moment, which makes for a great "whattafuuuuck" moment a chapter later when Harry lays down the word on why the Elder Wand belongs to him and not to Voldemort, which makes the book version of that scene immediately make sense with the built universe. *Sin 129*: Not when he is freaking out and confused about having just fainted, he can't. *Sin 137*: Even if he did, it wouldn't have worked anyway; can't kill the Master of Death who has just gotten a *Second* sacrificial protecting charm with *his own wand*. When you go back and reread this chapter, it's kinda impressive how Harry was not in any form of danger at all during this battle, the literal reason Voldemort could kill him in the first attempt was because Harry wanted him to. *Sin 140*: thank god that stream crossing BS only happens once in the books, never to be heard again. Movies were addicted to Dragon Ball ¬¬ *Sin 146*: all that climatic battle between Harry and Voldemort, thank god, never happens in the book either; Harry and Voldemort are separated by the fighting crowd when Neville kills Nagini (which also happens when Voldemort brings Harry's body, not later for no reason) and only end up face to face much later, to a duel that literally lasts 1 spell, and Voldemort at least uses the proper one. *Sin 153*: those two were really close friends throughout the books, since they were both loners under constant bullying they kinda gravitated together; and seriously, after becoming the veteran of the war who stood ground against death eaters for a whole year and being the guy who cut off Voldemort's snake's head with a goddamned sword, it's a sin that she was even still wearing clothes in this scene. Neville is the Sam of Harry Potter. *Sin 154*: even if Voldemort hadn't been strong enough to still force the wand to perform ok magic without belonging to him, it would still have been able to kill Harry because it would be obeying his real master. Again, Harry only died in the forest because he wanted to. Well this was a fun waste of time =)
LooneLuxxe not as long as you might think hah, I've read those books quite a lot of times for fun and they were the central piece of my first maaters dissertation so I'm confident to say I know them all almost by heart. As I said, it was a fun waste of time =p
And all those sins about not saying the spell or not using a wand: wands are just instruments to make it easier to use magic and they are used to perform more powerful spells. Wizards among the Native Americans never used wands until the colonial time. So wizards who are trained without wands, or very powerful wizards doesn't need wands for easy spells. And for the unpronounced spell thing, just read the sixth book.
Vinsmoke Sanji I mean he brings up solid points like every important object from each year is almost never heard of again like his point about why the luck potion isn’t mass produced and used widely is pretty hard to argue against as is when he says the plot always moves because Harry or someone is in the right place at the right time
Can just say how fucking PISSED I am at how they cut down the battle between Molly and Bellatrix? Like, I get time constraints and all. But in the books, these two witches fought so fiercely that the ground cracked! It was huge and epic and dramatic and it showcased not only Bellatrix as Voldemort's best fighter (which she was), but Molly as the absolute, badass powerhouse that I had been waiting to see for all seven books! And they cut it down to THIS little, thirty-second bit. Not to mention all of the other awesome bits from the Battle of Hogwarts that they left out... Don't get me wrong, Harry Potter is my jam, but they could have done so much better.
You know what HP movie needed a two parter? Goblet of Fire. Damn book was huge, with lots of junk. Think about it, we could have had part 1 end with Harry's name popping out of the goblet. And then we could have had some actual scenes of the World Cup in part 1 making the whole thing much better.
@@hithere4289 If we can have three parters out of a single book a quarter the size of GoF, surely people would watch HP regardless of one of the middle books in the series being a two parter?
@@Darkgun231 Pretty sure Harry Potter book fans would rush to watch a 100 part any-book film but remember film directors mainly aim mainstream masses to watch it so I don't think they would invest that much money only on hardcore fans :p
@@hithere4289 Wasn't the HP fanbase the mainstream audience? It was the most popular book series the world over for a long time. Plus, tell me you can't see greedy directors splitting single books into multiple movies for more ticket sales. Most people would still watch 'em, honestly, because the masses tend to be... gullible I think is the kindest way to refer to them.
Your cinema sins are so awful. They can’t put the “spell” that lily cast on Harry in every person at Hogwarts because it wasn’t a spell. She tapped into old magic by showing true love and sacrificing herself for Harry. Voldemort was going to leave Lily alive for Snape, but when Voldemort went to kill Harry, she jumped in between Harry and the killing curse. Only an extremely powerful witch or wizard could do tap into that old magic, not just anyone, and they must sacrifice themselves in order to do it.
+Tim Carter Plot holes are plot holes, since he's looking at the movies and not the books. That's the unfortunate thing about adaptation. So, yes, I agree: Sickening that book adaptations into movies often leaves us with plot holes. But the whole point of EWW is to make fun of the wrong things in the movies, many legitimate, many not, and many silly.
Spoler alert !! Special deleted scene include : Voldemort grew tired waiting harry to show up, ordered super mega size meal for him & nagini, after harry suddenly show up, he stuffed a mouthful bite of burger & fries, before casting the spell Voldemort : "OOOVOOODAA KOOODAAAVROO !!"
Lol yeah why didn’t he turn a napkin in to a horcrux and throw it away. It couldn’t be destroyed so it would just be an indestructible napkin that Harry would never know about.
Probably not cannon but my belief is that Voldemort needed to know where the Hocruxes were to use them again, so they can't just be randomly buried or in the middle of the sea or something. Also I think it would need to be somewhere secret as people would 'feel' the evil prescience. And lastly, it needs to be a powerful object to maintain the soul part. The diary, harry, and nagini are the only ones that aren't really and I that can probably be explained away with emotional magic(put his feelings in the diary, love/hate in making harry, something something snakes for nagini)
splinte111 No, it's not just you. There are also countless other people that don't know that the Harry Potter movies are just mediocre movies and the books just mediocre books.
Snoopy They couldn't have just digitally altered them? I mean, all that SFX budget money, and they chose NOT to input Harry Potter's most important feature.
I've always wondered: Harry was a Horcrux, basilisk venom destroys Horcruxes. So how come the basilisk didn't destroy the Horcrux in Harry in Chamber of Secrets? It shouldn't have taken Voldemort to destroy the Horcrux in this movie.
Straight F1ush and NoName I know he didn't die - but the basilisk venom is something that can destroy a Horcrux, and with it, the vessel. It's an instantaneous thing too - everything else stabbed with the basilisk venom - Riddle's diary, the locket destroyed with the venom-impregnated Sword or Gryffindor, and the cup - was destroyed instantly. Harry received a wound from the basilisk fang but neither he nor the Horcrux was destroyed. Fawkes saved Harry but the Horcrux within him should have been instantly destroyed at the very least. As Chocolate TaeKookie says, it's a major plot hole. Along with so many others, like Hermione claiming to have never previously used the Obliviate spell despite having recently used it on her parents. Still, the movies were great and the books were even better.
Sue Bolden About the Obliviate spell, actually in the books she modifies her parents memories and thus its her first time using obliviate on the death eaters. So in the movies they actually showed it wrong. 😅
I remember reading a post on Tumblr (I know, I know) that this girl had skipped to the last page of the book because she couldn't wait to see what happened, and it says something about Ginny giving Albus a kiss goodbye, and of course at this point she didn't know Ginny and Harry named their son Albus, and thought that Ginny was having a relationship with back from the dead Dumbledore and was so fucking confused.
dumpling dump parts of Tumblr are great, like the Harry Potter fandom, but other parts are really toxic, and there is a pretty bad reputation of Tumblr as a whole.
"Albus Severus Potter, you are named after two wizards, both who were murdered right in front of me while I was still a child. In fact, from my fourth year onward, my every year at Hogwarts was filled with murder and death and it was only luck that stopped me and everyone around me from dying in my first three years. Before that I was raised by my abusive aunt and uncle who beat me and forced me to live under the stairs.
But don't worry about all that. Please, go on with your worries about how your childhood will be ruined if you're sorted into Slytherin."
You win internet.
You need quotation marks at the end as well.
You were named after my brave professor who always me solved shit and the other who treated me like shit, but he liked my mom so I'm fine.
Albus Several Potter... it doesn't get any more cheesy.
Bravo!!
Voldemort: OAAAAAAVRAAADAAAA
Hermione: stop stop stop stop, your going to take someone’s eye out! Besides, your saying it wrong
this genuinely made me laugh
This is under appreciated 😂😂😂
Surya Suresh it’s AVADA KADAVRA! Plot twist: Hermoine kills Voldemort
Actually I'm pretty sure if you say that spell wrong your wand blows you up.
@@speedrunn4321 well really its whatever they're saying in their head haha
Just want to put this out there, pulling the trigger on a gun is like 100 times faster than yelling avada kedavra
Sergeant Johnson only if your boom boom stick is pointed at ur baddies ed
Sergeant Johnson You'd think hogwarts would mount machine guns on the roof or something when they became aware of the impending invasion....
Oh look! A swam of idiots charging us! Let's mow them down....
Sergeant Johnson Which is why the series was set in Britain and not the US ;)
Sergeant Johnson And now you're giving me flashbacks to that god-awful Harry Potter fanfiction "My Immortal" where they use guns instead of wands, everyone is a vampire-goth-satanist whose parents "committed suicide by slitting their wrists", and anyone who doesn't think that Gerard Way is the sexiest thing ever is a "prep" and worse than Hitler.
mattiesensei666 I refuse to believe this is a thing...I must deny its existence, for to accept it is to allow madness to consume my mind...
Imagine being harry and the knowing that your most hated teacher still had a crush on your mother
That should make hairy potter feel better. The hated teacher couldn't get what he wanted :(
He seems to be handling it well.
Filled Mug “hairy potter” 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
If snape didn’t just die it would’ve been way more awkward
@@unicornbarfingrainbows7599 *so harry your mum... Uh.... She was pretty hot*
How to be a better Voldemort
1. Grab a pebble
2. Turn it into a horcrux
3. Drop it into a ocean
4. Enjoy immortality.
made my day
ayy
You need to kill a person for a Horcrux tho
Or do the same for a grain of sand in the middle of a desert.
Cupcakeworldcat AJ
Ok, kill a crab.
Then you can at least eat it
"Harry talks in his sleep..."
"F*ck you!"
Hahahaha.
DashCat9 I know, right? Such complete BS. Just because you've heard a few random words in an obscure language you probably have never tried to learn even a few words of, doesn't mean you can string together even one coherent sentence and expect anyone (even a magic gate) to understand it. And it was even in the books. Frustrating.
***** You only need to speak one word, what you say doesn't have to make sense. Theoretically if someone with no knowledge of the language would say at least one word if they whisper long enough.
Pokemonfox4
I thought that one needs to say "Open" to the entrance to make it open up. That is definitely what I remember from the books, and the Harry Potter Wikia also confirms that. I mean, the gate would be pretty dysfunctional if any random hissing noise had a good chance of triggering it to open. What Ron was trying to do was essentially like knowing the letters that the language uses and trying to build random words out of them. The "monkeys banging on typewriters" analogy springs to mind.
DashCat9 weard shit
DashCat9
Fucking hilarious!
How Voldemort should have hidden horcruxes:
1 - Throw in ocean.
2 - Sneak into McDonalds kitchen. (It'll either end up in a random person's house or a garbage heap)
3 - Chuck through a person's window.
4 - Throw onto a boat.
5 - Hide in long grass.
6 - Under a bunch of rocks.
7 - In sewer.
BONUS - Turn a needle into a horcrux and drop in a haystack.
PlurpleDerp He really should have just gone into some random person's house and put it with their stuff. Bonus points if it's in another country.
Why not just turn a grain of sand into a horcrux and let it fly into space? Or at least the desert?
Extra points if it's on the other side of the world.
He was so vain he had to have his horcrux's be great trophies of his achievements
Extra points: attach horcrux to balloon, send ballon to space.
*"As you can see, we managed to sneak in ALL the Weasleys"* 😂😂
😂🤣🤣😂
except Charlie
Except the other 500 of them
@@ethanlamore2236 who knows, the Weasley family is more like the fucking Rabbit family
I wanted to like, but since the like count was at 666, i didnt want to ruin it
"Remus Rubeus Potter, you were named after two adults at Hogwarts who weren't complete assholes to me and used me as their pawn."
Crazy Jolteon Albus was a manipulative old man who kept a lot of secrets from Harry that could've helped him. Snape was an unapologetic abuser of his students simply because he couldn't get into Harry's mother's pants and then she died. Just because he went through some emotional trauma it shouldn't have affected his teaching duties.
wonderfulfun your an assshole
Agree as heck, like, why not name your son after people who actually cared about you, Harry?
I don't think he ever really wanted to teach, even tho he was good in that area. Slughorn's departure and him switching sides gave Dumbledore a reason to have him close. I think they planned for Harry's arrival early. And Snape's behavior had authenticity but also was staged (or exaggerated) because he would walk the finest of lines given Harry's connection to Voldemort.
Sirius was named in one of Harry sons James Sirius potter כּוֹחַ
2:32 in the previous movie, just after Bellatrix finishes torturing Hermione and she's like crying, you can see a hair fall onto her, and she watches it.
10:30 I'm pretty sure he used the wand just to slit his throat.
Discord Pone
yep. i missed Sirius Black's death but i managed not to miss that littel Bellatrix hair. xD
Wand + Incantation = Easy
Wand = Medium
Incantation = Hard
Nothing = Pro
nothing could also be an emotional person (probably teenager), as magic can also derive from emotion. Remember back in book/movie 1 when harry made the glass disapepar? no wand. no incantation. Just emotion. He wasn't a pro. just emotional.
+Hunter Haycraft and book three when her turned Aunt Marge into a balloon.
+Hunter Haycraft
Good point.
+Hunter Haycraft disappear
I explained it in a comment more fully in an earlier video, but this is actually a delightfully simple explanation.
When I was in high school, I got into a fight with someone and everybody in campus gathered around to see it...
But when Harry and Voldemort were having their epic wand battle, there was not a single soul watching it....
I don't think they know how schools work..
It’s double dumb because everybody was watching in the book
Maybe because everyone's off fending for their lives...?
This was still in the middle of a wizarding war, if they looked away for 5 seconds the death eaters will avada kedavra their ass.
@@Liam-jy7yi Everybody was watching it it in the books. In the books every other one of the death eaters were captured or killed
Yes! The book had such a nice pay-off.
It was in the Great Hall, everybody was watching.
Before Harry killed Voldemort, he explained to him exactly why he had failed in his plan.
Then he killed him within a second. And there were all these people cheering, the first morning sunrays hit the scene... It was perfect.
I was so pissed with this movie. I'm sure it was not a bad movie at all, it was just really dissapointing to me in so many moments.
Also missing: Voldemort paralyzing Neville, placing the sorting hat on his head and putting it on fire.
Why would Bellatrix, Nagini or Voldemort crumble and fall apart when being killed?
Why would Voldemort ever use his hands to fight?
“Man... if only I knew which Weasley this was... I might feel a bit bad about this.”
*Harry Potter fans scream in agony*
Considering how many tricks the twin actors played, including switching roles on set, I see Jeremy's point. In fact, the books make it seem like Harry can consistently and easily tell the twins apart, BEFORE George lost part of his ear. How?
George lost an ear, Fred died. Get over it!
@@dbseamz: Fred died
@@Alysa-Aiday HOW DARE YOU!! FRED NEVER DIED HES HERE !! HES RIGHT HERE WITH US
@@fleurdelacour1382 WHICH IS HOGWARTS HEAVEN WITH REMUS, SIRIUS, JAMES, LILY, SNAPE, DOBBY, HEDWIG, COLIN, MYRTLE and DUMBLEDORE
But is Hermione finally old enough to be hot in that '19 years later' ending?
Bleeters Seeing how she was born on April 19, 1990. She's been legally 'hot' since April 19, 2008. Which in the line of Harry Potter movies puts it around the recording of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince.
Bleeters ima gonna say yes because my body feels like my boner is jstified
DriftKingNL "Legally hot"? Is that another horrible Legally Blonde sequel?
Bleeters They (frickin' finally) declared her hot in the last video and also they sinned the fact that she didn't go topless in this one.
Bleeters You poor bastards, I was six when the first movie came out so she was always old enough to be hot. Well starting from movie 3 she was.
Well when "Regression" comes out, we will get to see her topless.
CinemaSins" Every horcrux was in and object, not a living thing"
Ummmmm, Nagini
Dumbledore didn't know it.
He says every horcrux harry killed
@@tianyuezhang6819 harry killed nagini?
Jan Urban No I meant in the video he said that every horcrux harry killed was an object. Harry didn’t kill nagini so that doesn’t count.
Annnnd harry
Something I noticed a few years ago: That scene where Professor McGonagall sends the Slytherins "to the dungeons" is actually not so dramatic when you remember that their common room is in the dungeons. So rather then it sounding like she is sending them to magic school-prison, actually this is the equivalent of sending them to their rooms lol
Good point!
BannØrn lol your right
But she IS holding them so they cant sabatoge the order of the phoenix. Read the books
wait thare common room is in the dungeons wow wy are sliderins trited purly
McGonagall sends them to the common room to be held in a safe place where they cant sabotage the order or get hurt in the battle
I would pay full ticket price to see Voldy skip rocks waiting for Harry.
Voldy is a OK nickname, But I also know that some people use the nickname Dumby for Dumbeldor. Not sure about this one...
Totally🤣🤣
Me too.
I wonder what the whole world other than Britain is doing rn instead of ,you know, helping kill the dark lord
Wouldn’t we all
"We managed to sneak in ALL THE WEASLEYS"
That made me laugh loudly.
can we just appreciate how the Order of Phoenix is now like 80% Weasley. Which is just outrageous!
Hermione Luna Morgenstern Herondale Prior which means it's also 80% ginger
TheAwfullGamer soo no souls for cruxe's i guess :P
Erebus2075 (Dramatically removes glasses.) My gawd... Brilliant!
Erebus2075 oh, true, i guess thats why.
There was once this time in high school when the Harry Potter hype was still a thing and I remember this kid was avoiding spoilers from the first movie as he wanted to see both parts in one. Then another guy went up to him and whispered, "Dobby dies", and he flipped out. We didn't see him for weeks. Figured that was worth sharing.
Haedox I hate when people spoil endings. I would have kicked his ass. XD
Hey guess what............................
DOBBY DIES
Haedox I had a friend who skipped to the end of the sixth book to find out what happens (he didn't really care about HP) then he drove by borders where there was still a line outside and screamed out his window that Dumbledore dies.
Haedox Nobody would care that much about the movie without having read the books first.
TrueTacticia Eh... he kinda was.
Harry: *gets married to ginny instead of Hermione*
Cinemasins:
*Writer disappoints everyone because she's afraid of cliche, cliche*
He was supposed to marry Hermione?
@@somex5500 It's complex. Don't ask...
@Thor Odinson everyone likes hermione, you suck
@@somex5500 no JK Rowling made it that she married Ron, but admits later that she wished that she didn't
@FireRat 16 everyone likes hermione, emma watson is great
I never argue Sins, but doesn't Harry literally say to Ron seconds before/after (can't remember), "they know the wand was stolen". Doesn't that answer the "why Hermione won't show her wand" question?
Exactly! Somebody who understands
***** Actually, I think it was Gripphook that said it, but the point still stands.
They also explain that Voldemort's name has a spell on it so that anyone who uses it gets tracked and that you can't disapperate into or out of Gringot's just in previous movies.
***** Um, this sin pointing out isnt serious to begin with, so its not like it matters.
Chris Bir Actually, they only explain it in the deleted scenes. If you've not read the book, you have no way of understanding. (Why that was more expendable than the dancing scene, I'll never know.)
I thought that saying Voldemort's name can make them be detected. That's why they're You-Know-Whoing. Am i wrong?
You are correct - the Ministry put a Taboo on the name, so whenever it was said, all protective enchantments are broken and whoever said the name can be taken in. However, this was never explained in the movies.
Phoebe Arellano Exactly. They dish out sins using exposition only available in the movie, not in the book.
^The Ministry didn't make Voldemort's name taboo, Voldemort did it himself.
ATBPjako no your right in the books at least but they never mention it in the movies so cinema sins take fair game outa that
I didn't know that it's not mentioned lol. Okay then thanks for the nice answers people!
"brooms right when we need them" at first it did seem oddly convenient but then you remember it's the room of REQUIREMENT
In the book it is explained that the tiara was protected with spells, so you couldn't use the Accio spell. I guess it was also immune from the requirement room
Elisa Risconti the books do not matter. If you have a movie that is entirely dependent on the books to answer all the questions the movie isn't doing a good job at movie-ing
Cactus Cow you are right, I also think that cause otherwise it doesn't make sense to make a movie. I just gave the information.
I also don't like how Rowling explains things in the interviews or through questions by the fans. She was supposed to explain the rules/plot/characters clearly during the book.
Ooohhh.
Dukker Jammish He didn't require a platter. Lol
Harry: "You're the gray lady"
Cinema Sins: "That's racist"
Me: "That's gracist"
🤣🤣🤣🤣
😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣
Wait it’s grey?? I thought always thought it was great lady
Will Stubbs yeah idk why I thought it was great lol
please
"Who's her?!" Well, he literally says Bellatrix RIGHT after he says "Why didn't you tell her?", so... Yeah
epic fail cinema sins epic fucken fail
what time in the video??
+Taylor Grimm 8:53
I know I was so mad I was like did you watch deathly hollows pt1 to see who "her" is
I WAS SAYING IT OUT LOUD
The fact you didnt sin the legendary Voldemort laugh is incredible
Eh heh heh!
AND HE SINNED FRED'S DEATH!!
@Kopi Bean *ding*
I agree! I had it as my text message sound for over a year
James Luqqy Lol I love that for you.
You forgot the Cho Chang, who is a year older than Harry, is standing with the students, with her f`ing uniform on. I don`t know about you, but I`m pretty sure there is no such thing as an 8th year😣😣😣😣😣😣😣😈
True
Maybe she got held back a year?
Or she came back after graduating and for some reason decided to wear her old uniform?
I'm just making stuff up here.
Jeff Li She comes back in the second wave of people that arrive to fight.
Jeff Li Also, shes supposed to be Chinese but Cho and Chang are both Korean surnames
GBM Crew Chang is also a Chinese surname.
3 minute mark: bellatrix’s wand was reported stolen, so if they gave it, the bank would know something is up
I’ve always wondered why, when they asked to see the wand, Hermione didn’t say something like “You KNOW my wand was stolen, now let me into my vault!”
@@Positivekitten I think they suspected that the goblins knew it had been stolen but weren't 100% certain.
Plus in theory she should have been locked in Malfoy Manor with all the others who let Harry escape.
they dit
You killed me with "we managed to sneak in ALL THE WEASLEYS"
RIP KhronicalTV, killed by a cinemasins video.
*Charlie doesn’t exist*
"My God, Voldemort just used a lot of his power and cracked his wand destroying our deadly force-field!"
"Can't we just put it back up again?"
"Nah, that's too easy"
James Gibblesghotten By the time the barrier was restablished, all Voldemort's people would have gotten in
MZG20 Well it took them long enough to arrive in the movie. At least a good 3/4 of the army would have been cut off considering it only took them about 20 secs to put it up
That's true
James Gibblesghotten Yes :). In some old strategy computer games, there was a simple defense trick: just dedicate some of your workers to constantly building walls and towers behind more walls and towers. They should have at least tried to use some wizards to just make force field bubbles inside force field bubbles, until V-t got magic arm/tongue muscle cramps destroying them.
Or to hard to put up again.
Another sin. Voldemort is pretty fond of the Avada Kedavra curse, yet somehow doesn't use it on Snape, for no purpose other than to make it possible for Harry to collect his tears.
Rasus The Fuckface There is a legitimate reason for that: the wand's owner cannot be killed by their own wand. So since Voldemort believes Snape owns the Elder Wand, he resorts to slitting his throat and letting Nagini finish him instead.
As for Harry, since he now believes he is the master, he uses AK, only to destroy the Horcrux part leaving Harry intact and in Limbo.
Jimbob1337 Huh... I guess that makes sense. Thanks, man.
Jimbob1337 Are you telling me he can't get another wand until he can claim ownership of that wand? Come on!
THEPELADOMASTER this is the Elder wand...it's different from other wands.
Nabiya Ri So? You can still kill someone with a regular wand
There should of been a:
*you know who* bonus round
** should’ve
sorry I had to
avada kedavra bonus round
The "ewwww" sin for Ginny kissing Harry was priceless! Lmao
300 likes? THIS IS RUclips!!!!!!!!!!
I agree. Kissing is gross!
"how did you get that sword?" "a hologram deer showed me the way" "seems legit"
Fantastic Beck lol,for all I know it was Snape's patronus.
Jesus Deer
It's better than electing a king because some moistened tart distributed swords.
Ablus: But dad, what if I am but in Slytherin?
Harry: Well, if you are
I'm sure they'll make a stage play about it
Difficulty Controlled Someone saw HISHE's Lego Harry Potter video. (Lol)
You've seen the Lego HP in 90 seconds? I loved that! Harry: Well 8 films, and a stage play. What next?
Hermione: (Reading Fantastic beasts} I think they should make a film series based on this text book!
Difficulty Controlled iI
Difficulty Controlled HISHE!!!
Difficulty Controlled ii
I'd like to say something.
*Voldemort allows this.*
He's still with us...in here.
*VOLDEMORT CONTINUES TO ALLOW THIS.*
He's riding a high right now. He's pretty much won at this point since his nemesis for 17 years is dead. He's pretty much gloating by letting Neville say his bit.
“Whatever spell lily put on Harry should have been put on the whole school by now”
I do not think you understand.
It *Was,* Idiot! The Book - Not so much the movie - has Harry himself explain to Voldemort that when he, Harry, sacrificed himself, Lily's protective magic protected everyone!!
Ramsay Sanders the books doesn’t matter, its cinemasins, not novelsins
I’m not surprised CinemaSins doesn’t understand....the movies do a terrible job of explaining that whole concept or why it matters in the Battle of Hogwarts. The movies leave out or skip over so much that they can be borderline incoherent if you’ve not already read the books. And that’s just crappy filmmaking
to anyone who don't get it, harry in the book let him avada himself to protect everyone from voldemort and his deatheaters, but I'm not sure how does it makes sense considering how it had affected harry
Exactly, Cinema Sins have never taken time to try to understand what some of these things means. Like about how he would never understand why snape put the sword in lestranges vault. Also he doesn’t understand the non verbal spells and the use of wands and how they are a way to transfer magic. It’s annoying when people have no clue what they talk about
Deleted scene also includes Voldemort picking his “nose” and trying to figure out what shampoo made him bald
Why is this so funny dammit?
giannis psillias thanks
WOAH I JUST REALISED 75 likes!!
Holy crud 84?
Omg, this is hilarious.
What I've always wondered is do Bullets work on Wizards. I mean that scene in the woods what if you had a bunch of snipers just shoot at Voldemort and their minions, would they dodge it? would they instantly be protected? are they bullet proof? something that I've always wondered about
JaxBlade In the books, its kinda assumed that wizards could just block the bullets, but I think in real life, bullets could work if they didn't suspect them. But, it would probably be easy to cure bullet wounds...
The Zecromancer I don't think you could do any kind of spell before a bullet would reach them at close range, like in the last fight scene Voldemort could have pulled a gun on harry and harry couldn't do shit to stop it, boom end of movie Voldemort wins.
The Zecromancer I don't think you could do any kind of spell before a bullet would reach them at close range, like in the last fight scene Voldemort could have pulled a gun on harry and harry couldn't do shit to stop it, boom end of movie Voldemort wins.
The Zecromancer i vaguely remember a character (probably Mr. Weasley) mention the muggles having 'silver wands' that they point at people then die, so given their knowledge of rubber ducks, I'd doubt the most they'd know is 'that thing is bad'
Although, given the intelligence of the villains in this series, they'd probably think a muggle couldn't hurt them and then get shot whilst laughing or something
The Zecromancer But a sniper could like Aim at the head and BLAT could they heal that if their brains cover the forest?
You get a sin for not sinning the moment where Lord Voldemort says " Harry Potter is dead."
*Creepy awkward laugh
*Ehehehh*
@@icebear6598 heeeeeeeeeeehhhheeee-eeeehhhhhhhhhh
That's not a sin at all. That shows how weird, creepy and different Voldemort is. Like the 'hug' he gives Draco.
"Voldemort at the improv"
Something that bothers me here and it is when he sins Hermione for getting the Bellatrix hair. There is a specific scene in part one that shows the hair float to her and it's not even that subtle. The scene is basically saying, "HEY, THIS IS IMPORTANT AND YOU SHOULD PROBABLY REMEMBER THIS FOR LATER." Don't get me wrong, I love CinemaSins, but this is just plain lazy.
I agree, but I must add that I've seen this movie 1000 times and it wasn't until the 1001 time viewing this movie that I actually saw the hair scene, they probably just overlooked it, they are human, but that is a sin lol
DarylAndrea Yeah, I agree with you. They are human, but since their channel is all about nit picking I thought I would call them out on it since the movies did account for it :P
Z3NZ IKR. I feel like CinemaSins don't even watch the movies first
Z3NZ "Why is this a sin? Because f*ck you, that's why!" ~CinemaSins
Z3NZ CinemaSins in general is lazy
No No No.Harry's Son's name should be Albus Severus Lucius Granger Weasley Potter
Albus severus hagrid draco granger ron lily james harry potter jr.
Albus Severus Voldemort Hagrid Draco Mcgonagall Gryffindor Quddictch Seeker Granger Weasly Potter Jr. That right there sums up everything about harry potter and thats also the new name of his son because..i said so
SuRge TriAl Good name except remove Voldemort. That would be a terrible name in the wizarding world even if said wizard is dead!
Albus Severus Rubeus Draco Godric Cedric Dean Thomas Griphook Neville REMUS Potter Jr.
Because what about poor Moony? Harry names his kids after his dad, his godfather, his headmaster/mentor/grandfather-figure, and the fucking potions master that loved his mom?
ok i get naming a kid after snape, but you'd think the mentor/uncle?-figure/man who made you his own kid's freaking godfather! would get priority. Couldn't JK have given them a another kid named like Arthur Remus, or Rubeus Remus, or idk, Dobby Remus? Dobby Remus Potter. Has a nice ring to it actually.
Also, Lily Luna, named after his mom and... a friend that was kind of helpful? and happens to still be alive, making her the only one to be named after a living person, which is fine, there aren't really a lot of dead women in Harry's life, but she could have been Lily Nymphadora? no nvm that's sounds dumb. If we're going with living people then what it SHOULD have been was Lily Molly, or even Lily Minerva. Hell "Minerva" is a nice echo of "Ginevra" so if JK wanted to have a Lily Luna, why couldn't she make a Minerva Molly too? They could even call her "Minny"
Ok, new official canon, Harry and Ginny had five kids:
James Sirius, Albus Severus, Lily Luna, Dobby Remus and Minerva Molly.
MooSurvivedTheTitanic true
Bellatrix's wand was stolen, so they knew about it. If Hermione presented the wand they would have know that something was not right.
"Skipping rocks across a pond waiting for Harry to show up."
Haha I can't get that image out of my head now.
Mike Cornell do you even know what kind of images I have in my head because of the books xD I read them in finnish, so translation might be little off, but harry is in 7th book like "are you saying that voldemort is hiding behind a dumpster and waiting that he could jump out and knock me out cold" or something xD oh dear.
He's wearing a hat and has his pants/robe rolled up to the knees
If it doesn’t skip he kills it and it’s family
I find it hard to believe that NO ONE in Slytherin wanted to help Harry. And they all just followed Filch to the dungeons without protest.
Some of them brought help in the books according to Rowling
+Skyebright1 Nope. According to the chapter 30 of the last book no student in Slytherin helped Harry fight the Voldemort and his minions. There were few from Ravenclaw, a dozen or so from Hufflepuff and a half from Griffindor.
+Arko777777 I suppose the Slytherins would refuse to fight because that may have been family members and friends in the Death eater crowd
Caitlyn Baron
I agree. That's the good reason why they all went to the dungeons.
Arko777777 If I was in that position and I knew my family and friends were fighting, I would rather go down to the dungeons and do nothing than risk getting them in more trouble
Sinning Cinema Sins for sinning thew idea that a Horcrux can't be made out of a living thing after we have established that the snake, a living thing, is a Horcrux.
MaxTheMaximumGamer Exactly! Is everyone gonna just gloss over that?
they didnt say it CAN'T be made out of a living thing, they are saying it shouldn't have HAD to latch on to a living thing when his spell went off, as Dumbledore CLEARLY implied. Meaning it could have easily latched onto anything from Harry's room. A book, a piece of paper etc...
Even then you could prolly ignore that by saying something like "oh well he used a spell on a living person, thus the spell rebounding would obviously attach to a living thing if possible."
Thew is not a word...
Also, how stupid is sin no. 102?
*ding*
“Oh look, brooms. Right when we need them”
Isn’t that the whole point of the room of requirement?
Eh not really. The room of requirement was supposed to be a room that its interior would suit the needs of the person about to enter. For example dumbledore once really needed to go to the bathroom and came across it, or in half blood prince harry and ginny really needed a room to hide the book. That room became the "lost and forgotten" room. Sure its very likely that some people dumped their old brooms there, but 3 convenient brooms conveniently placed next to them when they needed them the most? No thats just some plot device bullshit, otherwise the diadem should had been in front of harry as soon as he steps in, or like cinemasins has said multiple times why is there any conflict in the magic world when (and if) a room like that exists?
Well, that’s the room of hidden things which works differently than a just the room of requirement.
No. You cannot sin McGonagall geeking out over finally using that spell. That moment is pure bliss and deserves a sin off.
Actually, it should be more sinned, but not for geeking out. Powerful spells require practice. There is no way McGonagall used it for the first time then and there.
@@Merlin7 she's an incredible witch especially when it comes to transfiguration/charms. I don't think she'd need practice, even for a spell that is that grand.
It's just to get a fan applause from the audience.
@@Merlin7 prof mcgonagall was a master of transfiguration( she was the teacher too) she was the one who brought the giant chess pieces to life in the sorcercer's/philosopher's stone too.
@@shihoinyoruich3780 I've read the books over a dozen times. I know them by heart. Every professor at Hogwarts would have been taught security procedures and basic spells when they were hired. They would have practiced them that year. It's ridiculous to think otherwise.
Godric Gryffindor like dueling and he also thought it was unfair to use a wand against a muggle. That is why he had a sword.
"he also thought it was unfair to use a wand against a muggle" so he creates a magic sword ... still unfair to me.
The sword isn't magic, okay it is enchanted to be able to appear out of nowhere, but it is not stronger or better than any other muggle-sword. "The question of why a wizard would need a sword, though often asked, is easily answered. In the days before the International Statute of Secrecy, when wizards mingled freely with Muggles, they would use swords to defend themselves just as often as wands. Indeed, it was considered unsporting to use a wand against a Muggle sword (which is not to say it was never done). Many gifted wizards were also accomplished duellists in the conventional sense, Gryffindor among them."
The sword absord all the upgrades, that's the reason the sword can destroy an horcrux. This is an overpower sword final point. J.K Rolling like Tolkien doesn't know how to write without Deus Ex Machina.
Geesh, you don't need to be so upset about it.
Naomi Bousson Lol ikr
I hated how Professor Mcgonagall sent all the Slytherins into the dungeon just because Pansy told someone to get Harry. What if some Slytherins wanted to fight against Voldemort but they weren't given the chance to prove that not all Slytherins are bad?
This
My girlfriend actually made a good point about putting the Slytherins in the dungeon (not that the filmmakers were thinking this, but still): regardless of how you feel about Slytherin, it's an objective fact that a *lot* of them have Death Eater parents. That doesn't mean that the kids are evil, but do you really want to force them to choose between trying to kill their dad or being labeled a coward for not fighting?
yeah
Considering several Slytherin children had relatives and parents and friends fighting alongside Voldemort, it was mostly to protect the children themselves.
Not to be that person that's like "WELL IN THE BOOK", but once people realize that Voldemort is coming to Hogwarts all the students are woken up and gather at their house tables in the Great Hall. Professor McGonagall makes an announcement about evacuations and about staying, if you're of age, to fight against the Death Eaters and Voldemort. So most of the students evacuate but there are still groups that stay behind from gryffindor, hufflepuff, and ravenclaw because they're old enough. BUT. THE ENTIRE SLYTHERIN TABLE IS ABANDONED. So I totally get how you're saying that she should have given some Slytherins the chance to prove that not all of them are bad, but all of them were bad or taught that they were bad because THEY ALL LEFT to go join the death eaters or their parents to be on the bad side lol.
Movie Sin tally: 163
Sentence:
*_UAAAAAAAHHHHHUAUAVAVVVAAADDAA KEEDAAUUHHHVVRRRUUAAAHA_*
I am currently watching through all of CS's videos
This is the best Sentence ending (that does not include bonus rounds). Best "sentence", anyway. By far
SomeNiceMovies LMFAO Ikr
is it weird that i start feeling defensive when i watch these videos? lol
Yeah don't take them too seriously, they're for comedy and sometimes they miss stuff
Sounds like you have bad taste, joke or not. Cinema Sins can be bitchy with their writing but when they're on the nose they're on the nose
Wow, you're pretty defensive Dusk. Don't assume anything about anyone else. They make valid points that I agree with and I love all their videos. I just grew up with Harry Potter and it's weird to have all the mistakes pointed out that I never noticed. Relax.
Rainydaywriter23 you're the defensive one - i mean, you said it yourself; don't take a relatively not that good series so seriously in the future
+Rainydaywriter23
Nah, it's totally okay. No matter what other people say - everybody will feel defensive at some point watching cinemasins. That just how people work - we get defensive when things we love get questioned, criticised and ridiculed.
If I were Harry, at the end of the battle, before cracking the wand I would used it to repair the entire Howarts, or at least the bridge or Hagrid's hut
Yeh didn't look like a hard spell for Dumbledore lol. Sure Harry could of done that aswell..
In the books he used it to repair his old wand. So selfish.
it bothered me too 👺
i cant remember where but i read that hogwarts could fix itself.
Hagrids hut could be fixed by any teacher , prolly fixed by mcgonagall.
Juan Peñas in the book he used it to repair his own wand
This series of videos should be called "why you should read the books."
Don't blame me that you can't read.
+SupernerdScrawl You're completely missing the point of these videos if you think the books matter.
***** #dyslexic
It is a poorly written movie. That was the point of my comment. A movie version of a book is always horrible by comparison. The source matters. The source always matters. So yes the books matter. If you can say they don't obviously you're just a troll, and I shouldn't be wasting my time talking to you.
***** someone cant understand what "CinemaSins" means.
2:33 If you payed attention, in part 1 before they showed the engraved “mudblood” on poor Hermione, you can see her tracking Bella’s hair as it falls on her upper arm.
Paid.
Albus. Severus. Potter
Oh my God!
Was it wrong I went into a laughing fit?
Hermione Luna Morgenstern Herondale Prior I did too
Nope not at all! I was dying!! XD
that poor boy. I hope he ends up in Hufflepuff or Ravenclaw. I HOPE THEY ALL DO!! I’m sick and tired of Gryffindor and Slytherin
They named their pets Hedwig and Pigwidgeon. I don't know why I anticipated their kids having normal names.
Harry Potter named his kids like a nerd who just finished the Harry Potter series would have
Harry Potter is the number Potterhead
The worst sin in this movie is not including the plot line of the book in which Harry fixes his broken wand with the elder wand before breaking it...
Before breaking it? He never breaks the wand in the book!
He keeps it back in Dumbledore's grave so that when Harry would die, the Elder Wand wouldn't have an owner, hence it's power would be insignificant
+Reeta Singh no????? He broke it.
Ethan Joe and Chris Ayers we are talking abaut the movie, how they not including the plot line of the book in which Harry fixes his broken wand whit the wand of dumbledore.
+AuraMaster Maybe it was done off screen? I would have love to have seen that too, but I doubt Harry would want another wand other than his own
+AuraMaster he already has a wand so who cares
Harry Potter movies in a nutshell:
Sorcerers Stone - cute 11 year olds in wizard school
Chamber of secrets - scary pipe in the bathroom leads to certain death but 12 year olds are able to get in somehow (hogwarts how many lawsuits do you have)
Prisoner of askaban - time travel and just kinda wack but we here for it
Goblet of fire - stop fighting with ron harry
Order of the Phoenix - Harry’s one chance of having a god father must die of course
Half blood prince - let’s finally get to the climax of this story and kill another one of the beloved characters
DH part 1 - harry x Hermione
DH part 2 - world is obviously going to be saved since this is the last movie, time to bring out the innocence of all the-so called evil characters
LMFAO
how right you are
@Jon Hesson To a certain part of the worlds population, but not all
4:26 that is because if you say his name they know where you are
yep, was looking for someone pointing this out. you are right.
Its a taboo
Movie should've mentioned it.
@@jasondyrkacz8270 Movie did mention it
@sudha bhatt part one
JK Rawling has said many times that scene involvingv Hagrid carrying "dead" Harry into Hogwarts, was the first scene she envisioned when she started writing Harry Potter books. Since it was Hagrid who brought Harry into wizard world, it was very logical that he also brings him back into it.
She has also said many times that the only character she knew would survive the end for sure was Hagrid for exactly that purpose.
They probably didn't consider him threat or anything. And, lets be honest, he wasn't.
Miroslav Tomic and that's why most writers don't go with the first idea that pops Into their heads.
Miroslav Tomic It has been stated in the books that Hagrid had a resistance to magic because of his giant blood. They probably tried killing him, but it failed.
Actually, JK Rawling never said anything. Though, i know a JK Rowling who did.
Miroslav Tomic
Sin 52: Here's how I like to label thd Hogwarts houses...
Gryffendor: The Special Snowflakes
Ravenclaw: At Least We're Not Hufflepuff
Hufflepuff: Cannon Fodder
Slytherin: You Are Eleven Years Old and We've Already Decided You're Evil
Cupcake Wolf
guess I’m evil
I'm Ravenclaw and i feel bad for hufflepuffs here
I’m Gryffindor and I’m offended 😂
@gold ingot Nah Hufflepuff has Newt Scamander now. I wish us Ravenclaws could get a knockoff of the series with a Ravenclaw main character
Looks like someone spends too much time on tumblr..
Is it just me or does Voldemort sound drunk when he says the killing curse?
I totally agree
He does ... uhvuhdur kuhduhvur
Same L.O.L
AAVAVAAADAAAH KEVAADHAAAHAAH
"Abra Cadabra!" (Harry turns into a bunny) "It's not "Abra Cadabra," you tosser. It's "Avada Kedavra."" (Voldemort explodes!)
I won't lie, the comment about Lily's eyes in the flashback made me laugh pretty hard. "were they talking bout shape? prescription?" im dead haha
2:55 The reason they are being asked for Bellatrix's wand in the first place is because it is known to be stolen. Presenting Bellatrix's wand here, to goblins who've been briefed to look out for it, is tantamount to saying,
'Please arrest us immediately. And while we're talking, I'd like my room in Azkaban to have a sea view, regular bread and water, with hot and cold running Dementors, please.'
Overconfident sinning is overconfident.
Then why doesn't Hermoine as Bellatrix immediately reply "my wand was stolen". You might say they she didn't know it was stolen but if that's the case then why didn't she present it?
@Yawg moth don't bother, potter fanboys Are Petty as hell
The movie doesn't do a good job at explaining that though. What's more, even in-book it's not that solid, because if someone was going to impersonate Bellatrix, they'd likely try to do a good job of it, and the real Bellatrix wouldn't present her wand to a goblin, or anyone aside from Voldemort really.
@@yawgmoth6568, lord of the wastes, father of machines, the ineffable, all hail to you!!
Jamie Sleeman yeah they explained that better in the book and cinemasins has “the books don’t matter” rule
"Listen to me, Albus Severous Potter." Movie writes its own fanfiction.
Elijah Talmud yes thank you! I'm all for naming a child after someone you loved (for example when I have a daughter I am naming her Nora after my grandmother whom I loved) but there are some names you just don't do and that is one of them. His second kid James was a little better since James is a better name than Albus
Severous? Really? You didn't read the books did you?..
Hasn't CinemaSins taught you anything? The books don't matter. : ' )
Elijah Talmud They mean you spelled it wrong. It's Severus (it's latin), and the name was also in the books, so the movie isn't writing fan fiction in this particular case.
Now you can hate the name, some book readers do too.
Oh no, I knew that they were getting at. It was a typo I didn't care to correct. And it appears you misunderstood what I was getting at. That name is absolutely cringeworthy and sounds like something a teenage girl scribbled on her tumblr.
Dude. Horcrux a grain of sand. Drop it in the ocean. You are now immortal.
Genesectasaurus The problem is that once you die, you'd need someone to find that grain of sand and perform that stupid resurrection spell.
Telogor _ wait what? there's a resurrection spell? explain that
I think he means the stone
Will Tenenbaum i think he doesn't understand the whole thing completely since he is talking about the fourth movie where Voldemort is brought back to full form using Harry's blood, Peters hand and one of his fathers bones. they wouldn't need to find the sand piece, just whatever living thing your soul is now clinging to for life (like what happened to the first defense against the dark arts teacher in the first movie)
Telogor _ The thing is, you can't die in the first place
Also, when Ron said "if we did for them Harry, I'm going to kill you!" Let's just take you back to the first movie when Ron said "sort out her priorities!"
Since I had to leave about 50 comments for the previous HP video, here is a list of all of my comments:
-Dumbledore said that there was no spell or enchantment to bring people (or anything, for that matter) back to life.
-The sword is impregnated with Basilisk venom, making it a powerful weapon. Need I explain further?
-You can still USE wands from others, but the magic won't be as powerful.
-The dragon is blind and couldn't feel them.
-They said You-Know-Who because the word 'Voldemort' was cursed so that Death Eaters would find you when you say it.
-SLYTHERIN IS NOT FUCKING EVIL. IT'S THE HOUSE OF AMBITION AND CUNNING. NOT EVIL.
-Ron copied what Harry said for the locket to open.
-The Elder Wand worked like a normal wand. If he unlocked its full power, then it would be THE most powerful wand in history.
-In the book, both Harry and Lily's eyes were green and almond-shaped. Fuck movies for changing appearances, eh?
-YOU SAYIN' DAT NAGINI AIN'T LIVIN'? * ahem * Are you saying that Nagini wasn't living? SNAKES ARE LIVING, SENTIENT BEINGS THANK YOU VERY MUCH. Horcruxes usually aren't assigned to living things because they're very hard to... Well, you know.
-It's 'the power of love' or some sloppy cliche thing like that which saved Harry. Not a fucking spell.
I saved you from having to scroll through 394 comments. You're welcome.
Emerald Daffodils im sure some of those are only explained in the books so moot point
Sky Dayer Even if some of them were only in the books, people should still read the books first. Movies are an addon to the book; not a standalone copy.
"The books don't matter" - Cinema Sins.
Emerald Daffodils Nope Slytherin produces all the bad guys so Slytherin=Evil
GrimSleeper Peter Pettigrew. PETER. FUCKING. PETTIGREW. Oh, so it's not evil to be a Death Eater and betray your best friends by fucking causing their deaths? And Snape was not evil. And Merlin was the greatest wizard of all time. And Salazar Slytherin wasn't evil either. Draco is not evil. Plenty of Slytherins aren't evil, and plenty of non-Slytherins are evil.
Some of these are explained in the books but in the movies they're just like "ehhhh whatever"
Movies are time limited. And are amazing for what they had to work with. Deal with it
Vitalik Dakhnovets fuck these books and movies
We have a motto in cinema sins "the books don't matter"
movies are different sometimes and it's called CINEMA sins
if the movies represent the books they should have hit all the key plot points and there would have been no plot holes but the wand points will always have plot holes
Do you want to know the biggest problem with Harry Potter and the deathly hallows part 2...
They are too dark for you to even see half of what's happening 😂
Yes!!
IKR
That reminds me of GoT s08e03
then you either need your eyes tested or to adjust the settings on your tv... looks perfectly fine to me whenever I watch it, I never have trouble making anything out.
@@SA80TAGE Well, man, it's not up to you to change the luminosity... It's up to the directors...
You didn’t sin when Snape was hugging Lily’s corpse when there was a literally ALIVE and crying baby boy behind him.
@Kevin Sundelin Nope, Snape just left Harry there. Sirius showed up and was the one who took Harry outside. He lent Hagrid his bike and gave him Harry, then went to hunt down Pettigrew.
(I didn't read the book). I would argue that it was a matter of priorities. Snape cared about Lily. As far as he's concerned, Harry (or everything else) was not important. Some people just don't care to get involved. Just 2 months ago, there was a security footage of 2 old women (60ish) being attacked with a cinder block at their own liquor store. And you can see a customer sneaking away while the women were being attacked. That was not the first time something like that happens. And it won't be the last. Some people just don't care enough to get involved. Now that I think about it. It's also possible that Snape didn't want people to know he helps. He was a part of Voldermort's posse. He can't let it get out that he helped Harry. ruclips.net/video/5NiGW3-xBwI/видео.html
@@elsonlam okay but that's grown women who could maybe take care of themselves until help got there or was called or something. Even people who claim to not like other people would say you're on your own to them would usually not leave a little baby by themselves to possibly die like that. And we know Snape is somehow good at least a little bit and cared about Lily. So it really is bullshit that he just ignored the crying baby. completely. I
@@mariahdibben4066 But you're talking about complete strangers. If Voldermort finds out Snape helps, it wouldn't end well for him. Another thing to consider is that Snape loved Lily. Her lifeless body could have devastating effect on him that he momentary makes bad decisions. For him, at that time, nothing means anything.
9:08 they are literally in the room of requirement
Then why not a portkey to a safe place?
I think that would be Jeremy's counter to that argument
@@alwaysseverus741 I don't remember any such rules about having to know how to make the stuff inside it.
Hogwarts probably wouldn't allow a portkey off the premises, but I see no reason it wouldn't allow one to the outside of the room of requirement
@@SomeNiceMovies, unfortunately, they'd need permission from the MoM to create a portkey and then it would take a while to actually create said portkey. However, considering the emergency and the state of the MoM, an exception could be made for the permission issue. There's really no working around how long it takes to create one. Hmmm. It's a bit of a puzzle there.
question, did Hermione's parents forget her forever? where did she go afterwards? did she cast a spell on them so they would remember her?
It's said somewhere in Pottermore, that after the final battle Hermione searched for her parents and found them and gave them there memories back.
Advenassaurus Silva like a boomerang?
kinda funny. Hermiones parents thought they were someone else (fake names cant remember) yet they got to australia of all places with what passports Xd
That would alter the laws of time.
She deleted the memory so the paintings never happened if there is spell to regain the memory then that would be heavily overpowered.
She used a mind spell on her parents to make their memories of her unaccessable, but after Voldemort was gone, she tracked them down and destroyed that barrier. The pictures changing you see in the movie are just an effect so that you can actually see what she's doing. She really didn't need to change them in the books as there she said that she gave her parents fake identities and sent them to Australia.
"brooms! right when we need them!"
because it's the effin room of requirement!
xx April M aaaand, the Room Of Requirements is an ex machina closet!
xx April M wait, didn't whats her face blow the room of requirement door into a million pieces a few movies ago?..
Didnt the room only open if you need it not spawn brooms
From the books: The room only opens if you need it AND it contains exactly what you need inside it, except for edible stuff. But this is cinemasins, not booksins, so: "The books don't matter"
The... BROOM of requirement... I'll show myself out...
“Volde Post-Mortem”
Soooo you’re sinning Harry for killing Voldemort. Jesus, I think jeremy's a death-eater
@@dogsdreamtoo8427 what?
The confetti is to blame, in my opinion.
@@dogsdreamtoo8427 No one on Earth was suggesting that, so clearly *you* connected the idea of The Real Slim Shadow knowing his name, and The Real Slim Shadow being smart.
@@The_Real_Slim_Shadow94 man idk what the fuck was going on in my head when I typed that. It’s embarrassing.
@@TomBruhh yeah that was a fucking stupid and pointless comment.
Hermione didn't show Bellatrix wand because the goblins knew she had her wand stolen
Rhys Jones Thanks Captain Obvious!
That might be true but I think the reason she didn't present the wand because Bellatrix would never do something like that. The bitch was really pompous.
these videos arent serious
That's not why Hermione didn't show the wand. Otherwise she wouldn't have brought Bellatrix's wand with her to the bank, which she did. But yes, you are correct that that's the LOGICAL reason for her not to do it, but alas these movies are not logical at all.
Although she DID show the wand in the books...
Did they not explain in the movies that Voldemort put a taboo on his name so that's why they were calling him You Know Who?
GoldenStealthyRock Nope. They just start calling him You Know Who for no reason after they get found in the coffee shop.
They did explain, it was just very briefly during that radio scene. The movie expects you to have read the book.
I don't know, I watched it the other day, and I never heard them say that they can't say Voldemort. They just swapped back to calling him You Know Who. And a movie based on a book that's split into two parts (especially since the 7th book isn't that large) really shouldn't leave out details expecting you to have read the book. If any of the movies should've been split into two parts, it was the 5th. That book was fucking enormous.
Not really
Yes. In the extended version of DHP1 Ron tells Hermione and Harry in the tent that Voldemort's name is taboo.
*movie has one picosecond of logos*
Cinema sins: *angerey*
And two shitty parts with crap story.
He has to sin logos its a tradition and an obligation
4:09 the dragon is blind and doesn't know where he is going
Blindness makes it incapable of feeling people riding it? Or maybe you mean the previous sequence where the dragonfire should have superheated the whole area and cooked everyone regardless if the dragon was aiming at them?
That so sad tbo
@@scottmatheson3346 does a cat notice every flea on it's body every time it moves?
Don't forget.. Goyle died instead of Crabbe in the movie... They should have done that with Fred and Percy too....
+Dóbby Zabina Only because Crabbe wasn't even in the film. The actor got done for drugs or something, hence why he doesn't appear in the last 3 or so films
+elijah ”Bulbamew” handley He was selling marijana and used it. I already know that. Since it happened.. But the thing is, why change the death of someone else, when J.K Rowling has been confiming that Goyle has kids 19 years in the future... They changed Dumbledore after second movie, since the first actor died. They could have done the same with Crabbe. It just mess up everything.
Dóbby Zabina Probably just because Crabbe and Goyle weren't major characters. Rowling was part of the writing of the final films, she would have changed it if she disagreed so she obviously wasn't too bothered about Goyle dying instead
+elijah “Bulbamew” handley Agreed. and technically, Crabbe isn't there to begin with. lol.
+Dóbby Zabina Agreed. They also killed off Lavender Brown despite her surviving Greyback's attack in the books. I say Percy should have died.
2:30 In part one, it literally shows a scene of a hair falling on to Hermione.
CinemaSins Sin Counter: 1
*Ding*
this is part 2 though and there was a whole year in between films. TBF he'd still just sin it if we got a flashback though.
Nolanator7 how are we supposed to remember one strand of hair falling to hermione? The movie differences is one year. You’re dumb asf
@@kristen1684 Id argue since it is from Part 2, it is not unreasonable.
Nicholas Truman nope the scene where they’re in malfoy’s manor and bellatrix tortures hermione is in the 7th movie and the 8th movie starts with them brewing the potion. So I do think it’s u reasonable to remember one strand of fucking hair fall to hermione we were too busy being hurt by her screams NO I WONT SHUT UP
@@kristen1684 The hair fell on her while Bellatrix was busy scolding the other Death Eaters. This was the perfect opportunity for Hermione to tuck the hair in a pocket or something, and she exploited said opportunity.
For everyone arguing about books
The books don't matter because the movie does a poor job of translating or explaining things compared to the book so the movie deserves to be sinned, he's not sinning the books
The people who made the movies should just actually read the books instead of having them vaguely described while on crack, because i could have made these movies 100000 times better than this disrespecful pile of shit of a series. And yeah i did read the books hundreds of times as a kid
Um no you couldn’t...the movie received a 96% from critics most of which didn’t read the books. If you think you could make a better movie than one of the highest rated movies in history without any experience, you must not have very many brain cells
Thank you, you're a good person.
Even the books aren't immune. Rowling should not have included devices like Time Turner or the Liquid Luck. Those raises more questions than resolves conflict.
@@jamesluqqy3697 Not really, the only person who didn't really read the book was the guy who did GOF.
Just rewatched the movies and realized how terribly made 7 and 8 were, how much they depended on you knowing the books. Like when he sinned the "why are they afraid to say voldemort's name" thing, i was like "duh, because they made it Taboo and whenever you say it it summons death eaters/snatchers....which....they "showed" in the movie (you can see it happen every time someone says the name) but never actually explained....."
And just more and more moments that you fill in the gaps on your own if you read the books. I still don't know why people like any of the movies after the first 2.
And the "Lily's eyes" thing made me so mad!!!
I love you cinema sins, but your harry potter sins videos really irritate me because a lot of the sins you give are for things that have been explained in previous movies. For example, it's been explained that you can't use magic to bring people from the dead (as to why they couldn't bring dobby back) - this isn't the vampire diaries - and that you can't use the Imperius curse willy nilly because it's an Unforgivable Curse, as explained in goblet of fire. Check the canon first please
Tesslyn Francis The problem is -- and the reason the sin was given -- is that the rules are never properly explained or justified. Rules will just pop up and vanish when the plot needs them to. One moment you can do X, the next you can only do X if you Y. Why? No reason. Just because. Unforgivable Curse? You can use it this time. Why? Because you really want to. Instant transportation across the world like you did last time? Nah. Why? Tension! Magic that causes instant death? Sure. Magic that reverses that? Nah. Why? Just because.
Matilda Persson Maybe of you're confused about it cause you haven't read the books. The laws on magic are well fleshed out in the books. To clarify though: Harry couldn't use an unforgivable curse any other time because it's illegal. In this movie, he was already on the run in any case so why not use an unforgivable curse. In your defence though, the movies are very unclear. If they had followed the books, you'd be a bit more clear on the lore
Tesslyn Francis Harry broke the law because he was on the run. At the end, he is no longer on the run. So he will be arrested and sent to prison for life, right? That's the punishment the book tells us is due.
Tesslyn Francis That is exactly one of the stupid rules. Ok. It is the "Unforgivable Curse", so it is like a tax fraud. Ok.
How does ANYONE other than the people with Harry know he used it ? Why he does not get arrested for using it ? WHY can't you use magic to revive dead ? WHY...WHY...WHY ?
Tesslyn Francis Most of the sins were things that had been explained in the books, but not in the films, so I'd say that overall the film still had a hella lot of sins. These videos are meant to be comedy, anyway. About 4/5 sins at any one time are actually proper gripes.
1:03 because godric gryffindor used it when he duelled muggles, because sword fights where a thing back in those days.
Let's list all sins that wouldn't be sins in the books because there they were explained? Sure, why not? *I know CinemaSins doesn't care about books and I agree those things were problems in the movies, just pointing out how much better explained the books are*:
*Sin 12*: Pretending to put the sword in the vault was Snape and Dumbledore's idea, not Voldemort's; Bellatrix didn't give a damn about the sword, but she did care about the mysterious object that Voldemort had explicitly told her to protect with her life.
*Sin 13*: Harry used Hermione's, to a very poor effect (couldn't control spell intensity, some spells would just not happen or do their opposite effect etc.), which kinda explains why people don't use other people's wands if given a choice; meanwhile, in between the second and third book, Ron *did* get a new wand when his broke, one that just so happened to be much better for him because it actually chose him instead of being a hand-me-down from his brother like his original; as for needing wands, it's explained that it just helps casting magic a lot.
*Sin 19*: They present the wand in the books, and it doesn't work out at all: in the time it took them to get the plan ready Bellatrix had already made it known that her wand had been stolen and she was using a new one, so Harry had to use the Imperio Curse to fix that fuckup; apparently in the movie they made them a little smarter and made them realize that people might know they robbed a famous house a month ago.
*Sin 20*: In the books it's shown that he doesn't, that's why the spell breaking waterfall was even activated in the first place: he let them walk in the bank and went to call for security, since it would be theoretically easier to catch them in there but well, dragon.
*Sin 21*: Harry had been shown to struggle with the idea of using an Unforgivable Curse, even for good ends; the only time prior to this one he had used one was when he failed to torture and kill Bellatrix when she killed Sirius, and he only used the Imperio here as a last ditch effort (although the movie's change from the last sin made it look like it was his plan all along, which makes things lose all sense)
*Sin 26*: The last defense wasn't the Gemino curse, but the Flagrate one, and the door's automatic shutdown: instead of things multiplying, things were multiplying, the clones were boiling hot and the door was closed behind you, so you'd quickly be smashed by a huge wave of burning hot things; it would have been pretty fatal if not for the goblin they had to re-open the door.
*Sin 27*: In the books he realizes it would be physically impossible to climb a pile that is triplicating it's size every second you spend climbing it, and just has Hermione or Ron (can't remember which) levitate him so he can grab the horcrux. Remember kids, it's Levi*o*sa, not Liviosaaa.
*Sin 28*: The protection against stuff like Accio, apparating, and stuff like that is already a part of the whole Bank of Gringots; the murdery ones were covered by the mentioned crushing and burning spells.
*Sin 29*: As I just said above, in the books Apparating in Gringots is physically impossible, same like in Hogwarts.
*Sin 31*: The key word is "little" just before humans: the scale that is given to that dragon in the books makes it sound more like they were 3 mosquitoes landed on a human than 3 people sitting on the back of an elephant. In the books the dragon didn't even notice there was somebody on him.
*Sin 35*: Saying "Voldemort" by this time triggered a spell made in the MM that immediately revealed the person's who'd say it location and break any protective spells around them, which was exactly how they got caught and brought to Malfoy Manor in the books.
*Sin 37*: In the books there is an overwhelming feeling of desperation by the trio because they don't see any of their plans as successes: the plan never goes right, but they just fix everything quickly on spot (for example, the Gringots plan was to get the Horcrux and leave through the front door like if nothing had happened, not blasting through the ceiling on a dragon), which is why Harry finally has enough and goes "we always plan and then nothing happens as we expected and we have to just deal with shit, so why don't we cut the bullshit, go there just with our wits and deal with shit already?"
*Sin 38*: They use a spell to dry the clothes, which is smart and makes sense in a magic world, but denies male loving audience some Daniel and Rupert action; on the other hand, it doesn't leave female loving audience longing for some Emma undressing, so you know, balance?
*Sin 43*: It wasn't the painting who dug the tunnel, but the Room of Requirement. The room's powers are underused because of the weird way it works, which Neville spent his 7th year decoding and getting used to, which is why *he* was able to use it to a far greater extent than anyone else, doing stuff like making it dig a tunnel to Hogsmead.
*Sin 44*: The room works like a separate dimension, which is why you can hold a Metallica concert in there and people pressing their ears against the wall wouldn't hear a whisper.
*Sin 53*: Hogwarts never needed protection ._.
*Sin 59*: Riddle didn't approach the Grey Lady asking to destroy the Diadem, instead he used his sexy charm with her until she felt like he was a friend, at which point she gave him the Diadem because she thought it would help him.
*Sin 62*: Ron says in the books that he wanted Hermione to kill that Horcrux because it was only fair: she was basically the single reason they were still alive, and she still hadn't got to kill a Horcrux. It's sorta fair.
*Sin 65*: They have, for example the curse Peter uses when he is incriminating Sirius, which kills a lot of people at once; it's just that nobody ever went through the trouble of perfecting it into a formal spell, meaning that anyone who wants to use that would pretty much need to come up with a spell on his own, which not everyone has the brains for.
*Sin 74*: In the books either Crabbe or Goyle are too dull to remember that Voldemort wants Harry alive, and so they do try using killing curses, which makes Ron go berserk.
*Sin 78*: The moment the doors lock the room, altogether with everything else in it, stop existing immediately. Woe to the poor fucker who next tries to use the hiding storage version of the Room.
*Sin 82*: Voldemort went in too deep into Harry's mind and found out that doing that brought his conscience dangerously close to Lilly's protective curse, which almost killed him and hurt like the motherfucking hell; Harry only felt a small bit of the pain through the connection and it was strong enough for him to beg for death, just to stop it. After that happened in Book 5, Voldemort got way too scared of using his connection with Harry, afraid that if he kept messing with the link Harry could possibly trigger that reaction again, so he started protecting his mind from Harry's, effectively shutting the connection, except for moments when Voldemort felt such intense emotions that his Occlumency control would slip.
*Sin 83*: Actually, that's pretty much it: they really don't have any spells against giants xD Sure, some 40 people casting Avada Kedavra at once might make one faint or maybe even die if you're luck, but they are just 3.
*Sin 87*: Voldemort was experiencing the same problems with the Elder Wand Harry did with Hermione's. Sure, 9 out of 10 spells might come out almost as they were meant to, but the moment you are in a duel and one of your spells simply decides not to come out, you'd be dead. You don't bring a rifle filled with random blanks and real bullets to a war, and you don't bring a non-obeying wand to a wizard war.
*Sin 88*: He didn't kill Snape, he used a weaker curse to immobilize him and had Nagini do it, which is proof enough of how scared he was of going into battle without conquering the wand: he didn't trust it to kill Snape, instead using a far easier spell that had a much smaller chance of backfiring.
*Sin 91*: Voldemort gave him and ultimatum and a time limit, so he wandered around while there was still time.
*Sin 95*: In the books both of them had green eyes; why the fuck the films didn't do the minimum effort of at the very least casting a girl with blue eyes to match Danniel's (since he was allergic to contacts) is beyond me.
*Sin 97*: Better safe than sorry. It's not like that was his whole plan, murdering Harry was just another thing on his bucket list. If the prophecy was wrong, who gives a fuck, 3 more bodies to the toll; if it was right, yay?
*continuing*
*Sin 99*: So that Harry wouldn't kill himself to break the Horcrux before finding and killing the other Horcruxes. Dumbledore was a dick to Harrys.
*Sin 100*: Dumbledore gave Snape a signal to watch for: when Voldemort suddenly became paranoid about Nagini's safety, since he figured out this would only happen when Voldemort realized his other Horcruxes were being hunted. Snape didn't have things set up because he only realized Voldemort was showing the sign he should look for when he arrived at the cottage, at which point it was too late for him to do anything.
*Sin 101*: the Horcrux making spell is done before, not after. You have to set it up so you can capture your soul piece when it breaks off. Voldemort's soul was ready to become an Horcrux, but suddenly the main part of his soul was gone and it didn't have any way to channel into an object, so it latched on to Harry; also, about every Horcrux being an inanimate object, Nagini.
*Sin 102*: The spell Lilly "used" literally required human spontaneous sacrifice, it would be impossible to recreate before the battle; Harry eventually casts the same spell when he gives his life, which is why nobody else dies in the battle after Voldemort kills him.
*Sin 104*: It actually does; in the 6th book the power of female boners had already turned Tonk's patronus into a Werewolf =p it sorta makes sense since so many people associate their significant others with a feeling of happiness and safety, and that is literally the emotions the patronuses are made out of. Which means it's utter bullshit Harry's being a stag, since it was one way before he knew his father could metamorph into one but hey, we're not sinning the Prisoner of Azkaban here!
*Sin 105*: It took so long because of their caution: in the books Snape is only able to do that because, after months running around, Hermione finally gets a bit careless and lets slip the place where they are, which the Sirus' Great Grandpa's portrait (loooong story) hears and snitches to Snape.
*Sin 114*: for some reason, the movies forgot that Harry should have been using the Invisibility Cloak at this point; the worst thing is, even though it may seem like an insignificant plot change, it's not: the fact that Harry had the Cloak and the Stone with him when he died and was the owner of the Wand by right of conquest is *the whole reason why he is able to come back from the dead in the first place*. Shame on you, movie. Shame!
*Sin 120*: it's implied that they don't, but God is still racist in that universe because he allows wizards to come back as ghosts if they want to, and not muggles; although to be fair, becoming a ghost is sort of a horrible deal that most ghosts deeply regret because it's a miserable and eternal experience with no chance of escape, so HP God is justa dick to everybody!
*Sin 122*: Harry is literally Master of Death at this point. He could have the souls of every woman who was ever top dancer at the Moulin Rouge show up and do a cancan for him if he so damn wanted; instead the thing he desired the most was confronting Dumbledore and asking him what the fuck was up with that sadistic plan. Priorities.
*Sin 126*:
First, that Limbo isn't somewhere Harry was put for being special, it's been established since Book 5 that all dead wizards go there, where they chose between dying or becoming ghosts.
Second, as I said before, the books have the whole Master of Death subplot going on at this moment, which makes for a great "whattafuuuuck" moment a chapter later when Harry lays down the word on why the Elder Wand belongs to him and not to Voldemort, which makes the book version of that scene immediately make sense with the built universe.
*Sin 129*: Not when he is freaking out and confused about having just fainted, he can't.
*Sin 137*: Even if he did, it wouldn't have worked anyway; can't kill the Master of Death who has just gotten a *Second* sacrificial protecting charm with *his own wand*. When you go back and reread this chapter, it's kinda impressive how Harry was not in any form of danger at all during this battle, the literal reason Voldemort could kill him in the first attempt was because Harry wanted him to.
*Sin 140*: thank god that stream crossing BS only happens once in the books, never to be heard again. Movies were addicted to Dragon Ball ¬¬
*Sin 146*: all that climatic battle between Harry and Voldemort, thank god, never happens in the book either; Harry and Voldemort are separated by the fighting crowd when Neville kills Nagini (which also happens when Voldemort brings Harry's body, not later for no reason) and only end up face to face much later, to a duel that literally lasts 1 spell, and Voldemort at least uses the proper one.
*Sin 153*: those two were really close friends throughout the books, since they were both loners under constant bullying they kinda gravitated together; and seriously, after becoming the veteran of the war who stood ground against death eaters for a whole year and being the guy who cut off Voldemort's snake's head with a goddamned sword, it's a sin that she was even still wearing clothes in this scene. Neville is the Sam of Harry Potter.
*Sin 154*: even if Voldemort hadn't been strong enough to still force the wand to perform ok magic without belonging to him, it would still have been able to kill Harry because it would be obeying his real master. Again, Harry only died in the forest because he wanted to.
Well this was a fun waste of time =)
Sin 38: the dry clothes are in Hermione's beaded bag! :D Also, Dumbledore dried Harry's clothes before so there is a spell for that.
Jesus Christ, how long did you spend writing that?
LooneLuxxe not as long as you might think hah, I've read those books quite a lot of times for fun and they were the central piece of my first maaters dissertation so I'm confident to say I know them all almost by heart. As I said, it was a fun waste of time =p
And all those sins about not saying the spell or not using a wand: wands are just instruments to make it easier to use magic and they are used to perform more powerful spells. Wizards among the Native Americans never used wands until the colonial time. So wizards who are trained without wands, or very powerful wizards doesn't need wands for easy spells. And for the unpronounced spell thing, just read the sixth book.
As much as I like CinemaSins, as a Harry Potter fan watching these videos I am in physical pain.
Right he has no understanding of the realm
@@firstsonofthesea7938 But he judges just the movies, thats the point
@@ddubsquizzee2158 Yeah its just frustrating knowing the answers to his questions Im used to him ruining my favs though
Vinsmoke Sanji I mean he brings up solid points like every important object from each year is almost never heard of again like his point about why the luck potion isn’t mass produced and used widely is pretty hard to argue against as is when he says the plot always moves because Harry or someone is in the right place at the right time
@@bigblue207 i guess that's true but at the same time it still kinda hurts me
the way voldermorty said avada kadavra was fucking hilarious
UURRVAAAAAHDUUUUH KUDAAAAAAVUUUUUUH
SonicCam04 😂😂
he was digging deep to kill that man lolol
It sounds like I WANT A BANANA!!
Can just say how fucking PISSED I am at how they cut down the battle between Molly and Bellatrix? Like, I get time constraints and all. But in the books, these two witches fought so fiercely that the ground cracked! It was huge and epic and dramatic and it showcased not only Bellatrix as Voldemort's best fighter (which she was), but Molly as the absolute, badass powerhouse that I had been waiting to see for all seven books! And they cut it down to THIS little, thirty-second bit. Not to mention all of the other awesome bits from the Battle of Hogwarts that they left out... Don't get me wrong, Harry Potter is my jam, but they could have done so much better.
When did it mentioned it cracking the ground
I KNOW!! The only magic battle I liked watching in the movies was the one between Voldemort and dumbledore in order of the Phoenix
they really did fuck up the battle of hogwarts.. it was sooooo epic in the book... they also dumbed down half blood prince immensely
they did!!! half blood prince is my favourite book but least favourite movie
Let's be honest. If you love HP books you kinda hate each and every movie. It is just impossible not to, with all the cuts, changes of characters etc.
You know what HP movie needed a two parter? Goblet of Fire. Damn book was huge, with lots of junk.
Think about it, we could have had part 1 end with Harry's name popping out of the goblet. And then we could have had some actual scenes of the World Cup in part 1 making the whole thing much better.
Darkgun231 Well theaters wouldnt bother doing a two part fourth-movie thing. People would have lost all interest
@@hithere4289 If we can have three parters out of a single book a quarter the size of GoF, surely people would watch HP regardless of one of the middle books in the series being a two parter?
@@Darkgun231 Pretty sure Harry Potter book fans would rush to watch a 100 part any-book film but remember film directors mainly aim mainstream masses to watch it so I don't think they would invest that much money only on hardcore fans :p
@@hithere4289 Wasn't the HP fanbase the mainstream audience? It was the most popular book series the world over for a long time. Plus, tell me you can't see greedy directors splitting single books into multiple movies for more ticket sales. Most people would still watch 'em, honestly, because the masses tend to be... gullible I think is the kindest way to refer to them.
How about Order of the Phoenix? That was the longest book in the series if I recall
Your cinema sins are so awful. They can’t put the “spell” that lily cast on Harry in every person at Hogwarts because it wasn’t a spell. She tapped into old magic by showing true love and sacrificing herself for Harry. Voldemort was going to leave Lily alive for Snape, but when Voldemort went to kill Harry, she jumped in between Harry and the killing curse. Only an extremely powerful witch or wizard could do tap into that old magic, not just anyone, and they must sacrifice themselves in order to do it.
4:48 a very subtle way of saying I wish Hermione was half naked in this scene 😂
They should have done what they did when Leeloo got changed in The Fifth Element.
😏😏😏
Agreed
Who, I'm asking WHO didn't thought about this. XD
@@onyxdemeraude2412 lul
All adaptation induced plot holes... Sickening
+Tim Carter And petty personal quips.
+Tim Carter Books don't matter in cinema sins.
+Tim Carter Plot holes are plot holes, since he's looking at the movies and not the books. That's the unfortunate thing about adaptation. So, yes, I agree: Sickening that book adaptations into movies often leaves us with plot holes.
But the whole point of EWW is to make fun of the wrong things in the movies, many legitimate, many not, and many silly.
+Tim Carter Fuck books...the movies are much better. You can see what's going on in 3D.
cagedtigersteve With books, you can let your imagination do the work. And the imagination is limitless.
Spoler alert !!
Special deleted scene include :
Voldemort grew tired waiting harry to show up, ordered super mega size meal for him & nagini, after harry suddenly show up, he stuffed a mouthful bite of burger & fries, before casting the spell
Voldemort : "OOOVOOODAA KOOODAAAVROO !!"
XD ahahahhhaha this made my day🤣🤣🤣🤣
Good ones
XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
🤣🤣🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
Lol yeah why didn’t he turn a napkin in to a horcrux and throw it away. It couldn’t be destroyed so it would just be an indestructible napkin that Harry would never know about.
*it just makes burgers and fries appear*
Voldemort: *frick*
Probably not cannon but my belief is that Voldemort needed to know where the Hocruxes were to use them again, so they can't just be randomly buried or in the middle of the sea or something. Also I think it would need to be somewhere secret as people would 'feel' the evil prescience. And lastly, it needs to be a powerful object to maintain the soul part. The diary, harry, and nagini are the only ones that aren't really and I that can probably be explained away with emotional magic(put his feelings in the diary, love/hate in making harry, something something snakes for nagini)
is it just me or was most of th things he complains about actually explained in the other movies?
yes they are, they sin things that shouldn't be sinned
splinte111 Or in the books. And that was annoying as fuck.
splinte111 No, it's not just you. There are also countless other people that don't know that the Harry Potter movies are just mediocre movies and the books just mediocre books.
ExecratedPlays I reject your opinion and substitute my own. Harry Potter is awesome
ExecratedPlays We all have different tastes everyone to each their own.
Fun Fact: Harry's eyes were originally supposed to be green, but Daniel had a minor allergic reaction to the contacts, so he couldn't wear them.
+EmeraldBomb
They were supposed to be green
Even if he had worn the contacts, it wouldn't have mattered because they still made Lily's eyes brown lol
Amy Stroud True, but they also tried to have Lily wear blue contacts and they didn't show up on camera.
Snoopy They couldn't have just digitally altered them?
I mean, all that SFX budget money, and they chose NOT to input Harry Potter's most important feature.
Snoopy
This isn’t a fun fact if you read a single sentence of the books.
I've always wondered: Harry was a Horcrux, basilisk venom destroys Horcruxes. So how come the basilisk didn't destroy the Horcrux in Harry in Chamber of Secrets? It shouldn't have taken Voldemort to destroy the Horcrux in this movie.
Sue Bolden because harry didnt die of the venom...if a horcrux is a living thing it has to die of something what is "anti-horcrux"
Sue Bolden Yeah I saw that on one of the greatest plot holes in movies. I think JK tried explaining it but it was pretty desperate 😂
Sue Bolden harry didnt die from the basilisk
Straight F1ush and NoName I know he didn't die - but the basilisk venom is something that can destroy a Horcrux, and with it, the vessel. It's an instantaneous thing too - everything else stabbed with the basilisk venom - Riddle's diary, the locket destroyed with the venom-impregnated Sword or Gryffindor, and the cup - was destroyed instantly. Harry received a wound from the basilisk fang but neither he nor the Horcrux was destroyed. Fawkes saved Harry but the Horcrux within him should have been instantly destroyed at the very least. As Chocolate TaeKookie says, it's a major plot hole. Along with so many others, like Hermione claiming to have never previously used the Obliviate spell despite having recently used it on her parents. Still, the movies were great and the books were even better.
Sue Bolden About the Obliviate spell, actually in the books she modifies her parents memories and thus its her first time using obliviate on the death eaters.
So in the movies they actually showed it wrong. 😅
Godric Gryffindor used the sword against muggles that he duelled so that he wouldn’t have an unfair advantage
I remember reading a post on Tumblr (I know, I know) that this girl had skipped to the last page of the book because she couldn't wait to see what happened, and it says something about Ginny giving Albus a kiss goodbye, and of course at this point she didn't know Ginny and Harry named their son Albus, and thought that Ginny was having a relationship with back from the dead Dumbledore and was so fucking confused.
why isn't this top comment
Why are you saying "I know, I know"? Tumblr is great
dumpling dump parts of Tumblr are great, like the Harry Potter fandom, but other parts are really toxic, and there is a pretty bad reputation of Tumblr as a whole.
+Allie Berry I guess so
Excuse me, what the fuck?