Everything Wrong With Harry Potter & The Deathly Hallows Part 1

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 фев 2025
  • You've waited long enough. Finally... we bring you the sins of the final Harry Potter movie. Well... Part 1, at least.
    Free snacks!! naturebox.com/c...
    Jeremy's book is out everywhere: theablesbook.com
    Thursday: More sins!
    Remember, no movie is without sin. Which movie's sins do YOU want to see recounted?
    Tweet us: / cinemasins
    Tumble us: / cinema-sins
    Call us: 405-459-7466
    Reddit with us: / cinemasins Merch: teespring.com/...
  • КиноКино

Комментарии • 13 тыс.

  • @egyptian_noob
    @egyptian_noob 5 лет назад +3869

    half these things are explained in the book
    i'm not mad at him, i'm mad at the movie for doing a shit job at explaining things

    • @jamiec9260
      @jamiec9260 5 лет назад +146

      @Adwaith To be fair there's a lot of stuff they could have cut and info that they every easily could have slipped in to a number of conversations.

    • @bestintheworld7090
      @bestintheworld7090 5 лет назад +30

      Explain usage of magic with and without words because honestly ive always wondered about that.

    • @danielaf3092
      @danielaf3092 5 лет назад +71

      @@bestintheworld7090 Wands are magical instruments that help wizards channel their powers for better results. Wandless magic is possible but requires greater skills.

    • @bestintheworld7090
      @bestintheworld7090 5 лет назад +16

      @@danielaf3092 what about saying the spells out loud vs somehow doing the same spells without saying anything?

    • @danielaf3092
      @danielaf3092 5 лет назад +83

      @@bestintheworld7090 Like wandless magic, non verbal spells are harder to perform. They are crucial in duels, so your opponents have a harder time defending themselves.

  • @wildfirefox1
    @wildfirefox1 9 лет назад +642

    I'm so mad because about 80% of these sins are sins simply because the movies cut out everything that explained what was going on. I'm not saying it's your guys' fault, it's not, it's the movie's for not properly explaining.

    • @HEJeffrey
      @HEJeffrey 9 лет назад +2

      Vash Zwingli my sentiments exactly...the movies cut out too much stuff, they should CinemaSins shoudl read the books then re-evaluate this

    • @jtq1995
      @jtq1995 9 лет назад +149

      Jeffrey Hongo But in the case of CinemaSins, "The Books Do Not F*cking Matter"

    • @sadisticunicorn4854
      @sadisticunicorn4854 9 лет назад +50

      Jeffrey Hongo Nah CinemaSins base it off purely whats in the movie- any other media is irrelevent.

    • @kingsapau
      @kingsapau 9 лет назад +54

      Jeffrey Hongo you must be new to this channel

    • @JimmyNoonan724
      @JimmyNoonan724 9 лет назад

      Vash Zwingli that's what I was saying lol I still found a lot of humor in the video, but the book, like you said, explains 80% of what he said

  • @arturo435
    @arturo435 5 лет назад +590

    One of the biggest sins of the movie series is they never explain why people were afriad of speaking Voldemort's name. In the past, once Voldemort became strong and influential enough within the Ministry, a sort of trace was put on the name, so that you could be located if you ever spoke it, Death Eaters would apparate near you because speaking the name would be seen as an act of defiance. By Deathly Hallows, the 'trace' is back online.
    In this movie, people who speak the name are located twice this way, in the Coffee shop and in Lovegood's house, but IT'S NEVER EXPLAINED. And I'm pretty sure Harry HIMSELF in this movie(Part 1 & 2) switches from his usual calling of Voldemort by his name to You-Know-Who, but it is never EXPLAINED in the movies.
    It's such a wasted opportunity. Throughout the entire movie series, from the very first one, wizards are terrified of speaking his name, and when they finally get the chance to explain the main reason WHY, they just ignore it. Smh.

    • @am7737
      @am7737 5 лет назад +10

      I think Ron does explain it but its a very very passing comment right when he comes back if I'm not mistaken...

    • @areyouscaredyet6916
      @areyouscaredyet6916 5 лет назад +10

      @@am7737 that was in a deleted scene

    • @factor.8795
      @factor.8795 4 года назад +2

      Reshma Mohan when you said voldermort, death eaters would know your location so they would instead say “youknowwho”

    • @briantennyson6872
      @briantennyson6872 4 года назад +9

      The movies didn't explain it, they showed it instead, which to be fair is what a movie should do!

    • @bettyravioli7334
      @bettyravioli7334 4 года назад +7

      I mean, it’s pretty heavily implied when the death-eaters arrive at Luna Lovegood’s house, since right when he says Voldemort they appear

  • @parkerson1
    @parkerson1 5 лет назад +888

    0:57
    "You make it sound like the wand is actually part of the owner's physical being, and that twin wands know not to kill each other, which can't be true."
    ...But that's exactly what happened.

    • @samiracle
      @samiracle 4 года назад +13

      Random Gaming it’s explained when they talk specifically about this- the book was broken into two movies and that part of the book ended up in part 2 of the film.

    • @phillipjackson3498
      @phillipjackson3498 4 года назад +5

      Plus Wandless Magic.

    • @Tobytyty101
      @Tobytyty101 4 года назад +7

      @Random Gaming They literally explain in the first movie that wands choose the wizard or witch. This entire two part movie is reliant on a wand that doesn't obey to Voldemort. Just because the movie doesn't spell it out for you doesn't mean they don't explain it.

    • @Tobytyty101
      @Tobytyty101 4 года назад +6

      @Random Gaming But Voldemort does explain it. He says it in the clip for the sin. That is then reinforced by moments both before and later in the series.

    • @Tobytyty101
      @Tobytyty101 4 года назад +2

      @Random Gaming That's fine. I don't agree with some things the movie did either but the wand thing never bothered me.

  • @onaaa9545
    @onaaa9545 5 лет назад +2034

    sin 147
    they can't say Voldemort's name because there's a taboo on it. if you say his name, death eaters will be able to track you. and that's how they found them in the coffee shop

    • @katthompson3723
      @katthompson3723 5 лет назад +51

      Right, there's a trace on his name.

    • @Red_Beard2798
      @Red_Beard2798 5 лет назад +88

      Despite the fact that Harry says Voldemort MULTIPLE times as a child, and yet Hogwarts was never assaulted by Death Eaters. Harry's biggest threats have always been either a single double agent, or a plan that's so thin and fragile requiring so many separate circumstances to go right that they could be thwarted by simply disagreeing to do it. And one year (Prisoner) Voldemort wasn't a concern AT ALL, the focus was entirely on Sirius who was only perceived as a Death Eater. Seems this taboo/hex is faulty. Or plot convenient.
      *ding*

    • @Red_Beard2798
      @Red_Beard2798 5 лет назад +34

      Thor Odinson - Oooh, so it was only once Voldy had genuinely returned as the dark lord that the curse came back

    • @victoriaoneal1946
      @victoriaoneal1946 5 лет назад +94

      YeahNahHowYaGoin it was only after Voldemort and his followers took over the ministry of magic that they put the taboo on the name

    • @demonelise2489
      @demonelise2489 5 лет назад +5

      Yeah, that's what I was gonna say.

  • @Jay_Fry
    @Jay_Fry 8 лет назад +2521

    I think Molly Weasley was doing the dished because she needed to take her mind off the danger by doing manual labor.

    • @02Nolife
      @02Nolife 8 лет назад +43

      yes the people should have read the books you get a better takes on everything like most of the sins are explain like voldmort's name the wands Molly with the stress and paranoia with her clock and needs to be busy

    • @02Nolife
      @02Nolife 8 лет назад +10

      yes the people should have read the books you get a better takes on everything like most of the sins are explain like voldmort's name the wands Molly with the stress and paranoia with her clock and needs to be busy

    • @02Nolife
      @02Nolife 8 лет назад +4

      HypnoTheWolf oh i agree i just wanted to put this out-there for the rest who don't know

    • @andycaines3351
      @andycaines3351 8 лет назад +24

      "Housewife does housework to take her mind off something dangerous" sin. DING!

    • @aaron75fy
      @aaron75fy 8 лет назад +10

      Matt Shea you hear that? that's the sound of every father/brother/son in the world wanting you to get hit by a bus caveman

  • @karlon7132
    @karlon7132 7 лет назад +3413

    Why transform everybody into Harry and risk their lives instead of making Harry look like someone else?

    • @indy_go_blue6048
      @indy_go_blue6048 7 лет назад +325

      Good point.

    • @jalienjay1634
      @jalienjay1634 7 лет назад +337

      That was dumbledores idea in the books too lol

    • @r.r815
      @r.r815 7 лет назад +135

      Kátrox I mean, if they know Harry is at his house, but when everyone leaves he isn't there. Then he would still have to be with them. Even if they didn't theorize this they would try to get the information out of the people fleeing his house, at least this way it brings some confusion

    • @tsriketwm7274
      @tsriketwm7274 7 лет назад +73

      Kátrox or how about use muggle transport/ walk for idk, say, 40% of the trip, or disguise the brooms as a car, then fly low, or enchant a semi truck then- oh wait actually the semi truck idea is abysmal

    • @fernleaf1158
      @fernleaf1158 6 лет назад +61

      Why would there be a large group of people who obviously and openly oppose Voldemort just randomly be flying around on brooms and Thestrals in the sky near the place where Harry lives? Not suspicious at all, right?

  • @Jealod24
    @Jealod24 5 лет назад +1326

    Ron’s unwarranted jealousy is because he is carrying the horcrux, and as a result is absorbing dark/negative energy.

    • @lunari2939
      @lunari2939 5 лет назад +59

      yep, and anyone who READ THE BOOKS WOULD KNOW THIS SHIT

    • @PrimDidEverythingWrong
      @PrimDidEverythingWrong 5 лет назад +56

      ripexe
      Yeah but this is the movie, and it didn’t explain it there as far as I remember. The name of the creator of this video is CINEMA sins, not BOOK sins.

    • @zeoalexo
      @zeoalexo 4 года назад +79

      @@PrimDidEverythingWrong they literally explain it when Hermione first tells Harry to give her the locket.

    • @suhassen5997
      @suhassen5997 4 года назад +4

      Harry is a horcrux ofc. Soo...

    • @Gloomyraindrop
      @Gloomyraindrop 4 года назад +24

      @@lunari2939 I didn't read the books and even I knew this. They kind of hinted that in the movie lol Hermione even mentioned it at least twice.

  • @rorysnow7937
    @rorysnow7937 8 лет назад +2685

    Instead of calling him "you know who" they should have given him a demeaning code name, like "dickwad" or "douchetard" or something like that cause it would be easier

  • @sjc5132
    @sjc5132 6 лет назад +316

    "handed to them on a Harry Platter so they can advance the Harry Plotter"
    i laughed waaaay longer than i should have

    • @chasm671
      @chasm671 4 года назад +8

      You mean... way longbottomer?
      Oh, cool! I've never seen a real tumbleweed before!

    • @nikitanair6566
      @nikitanair6566 4 года назад +5

      It killed me too. XD

  • @kasperstalder4290
    @kasperstalder4290 7 лет назад +867

    "Midnight, mom always said midnight" Molly Weasley hates twilight, that's why she killed Bella

  • @jasonjuneau
    @jasonjuneau 5 лет назад +253

    "What's the spell? Is it a stupify spell? A kill spell? A speak and spell?"
    - Cinemasins, 2015

    • @conserztasfia0078
      @conserztasfia0078 3 года назад +3

      I think they say that spell in mind
      Like they never speak expeliamus loudly
      They say it in mind

  • @awsomjos1013
    @awsomjos1013 5 лет назад +656

    Sin 47: literally it says that that day was his birthday like 2 seconds after you cut the clip

    • @marmitaa8619
      @marmitaa8619 5 лет назад +14

      Ah sorry. He should have awarded 2 sins for convenience. Like pretty much everything in these movies.

    • @ludwiggalaxy4277
      @ludwiggalaxy4277 5 лет назад +27

      @@marmitaa8619How is that convenience? It's just like saying "Oh, my piano lessons are today, which are sessions where I practice piano, and today I got a new piano. What a coincidence!"

    • @marmitaa8619
      @marmitaa8619 5 лет назад +1

      @@ludwiggalaxy4277 I don't think you know what the definition of convenience is.

    • @oliveroswald177
      @oliveroswald177 5 лет назад

      Was gonna like but it was on 69. Sorry not sorry

    • @marmitaa8619
      @marmitaa8619 5 лет назад

      @@oliveroswald177 What?

  • @devinmann3034
    @devinmann3034 7 лет назад +306

    I read through most of the comments and cant believe somebody didnt mention that at 4:20 he says that the Deluminator should be called the illuminator, it literally takes the light out of things, it "de-lights" them. Jeez Dumbledore even did it in the first movie. Cmon man...

    • @smokedcheese6431
      @smokedcheese6431 6 лет назад

      It bothered me too!

    • @ohsunnydays
      @ohsunnydays 6 лет назад +11

      its almost like he just nit picks and doesnt actually watch the movies what a shocker

    • @JamesGames01
      @JamesGames01 6 лет назад

      Devin Mann its same with every fact like the house burnt down so they dont have the magic servant things

    • @281Braden
      @281Braden 6 лет назад

      6:30 Harry's dead uncle.... righto then

    • @anonym58063
      @anonym58063 6 лет назад +1

      lol 4:20

  • @alexrompen805
    @alexrompen805 6 лет назад +281

    On a Harry Platter to advance the Harry Plotter..... oh god I laughed so hard

  • @soysoyoof4895
    @soysoyoof4895 5 лет назад +448

    0:11 the reason because the Wesley’s have a House because in the book it never was burned down

    • @instantstupor
      @instantstupor 5 лет назад +53

      But it was in the movies, so that's the reality that should be being followed in...ya know, the movies.

    • @chupapi7620
      @chupapi7620 4 года назад +7

      @@instantstupor yeah but he explained himself, they probably fixed it with magic or some shit

    • @LadyOnikara
      @LadyOnikara 4 года назад +9

      @Godel Escher Bach Well, since they don't live in California, they can afford it.

    • @lacrossestick132
      @lacrossestick132 4 года назад +4

      Real estate must be so cheap in England. Imagine the property tax on a house like that in the US.

    • @zzxp1
      @zzxp1 2 года назад

      Well the solution is easy, like... magic?
      They can repair shit with magic, never understood why they made that scene so dramatic like: Anyway wish woosh homeless finitate

  • @HiddenValar
    @HiddenValar 6 лет назад +2853

    I'm sorry, i know this is all in good fun and all but.... did you just sin Doby's Funeral...?

    • @andybagles4156
      @andybagles4156 6 лет назад +361

      Did you just misspell Dobby? ;P

    • @HiddenValar
      @HiddenValar 6 лет назад +167

      @@andybagles4156 shit....

    • @Nish-ej3zn
      @Nish-ej3zn 5 лет назад +95

      @@HiddenValar and have you still haven't editted it?

    • @HiddenValar
      @HiddenValar 5 лет назад +225

      @@Nish-ej3zn mistakes are the only way we learn, young one.

    • @splintercell320
      @splintercell320 5 лет назад +48

      AbyssKnifes I’ve read the books and I honestly felt nothing for Dobby’s Funeral.

  • @HDWalrus123
    @HDWalrus123 8 лет назад +213

    "serve it up on a Harry Platter to advance the Harry Plotter" as far as puns go, this is the best one

  • @amyyyrose
    @amyyyrose 7 лет назад +613

    Maybe Hermione was wearing perfume because she hadn't showered since at least Grimmauld place and had been staying in a tent with 2 teenage boys for at least a week

    • @jms2a30
      @jms2a30 5 лет назад +37

      no, because she was at a wedding

    • @IgnoreMeImWrong
      @IgnoreMeImWrong 5 лет назад +30

      Perfume is designed to make them less horny?

    • @joannak3821
      @joannak3821 5 лет назад +10

      @@jms2a30 the parfume still stay? What kind of parfume is that

    • @jms2a30
      @jms2a30 5 лет назад +7

      @@joannak3821 it's called body smell

    • @theazureknight6552
      @theazureknight6552 5 лет назад +17

      So... Don't they have an infinite supply of water, because a refilling spell exists? Why wouldn't they shower, using the spells Hermoine used to turn their camp invisible as curtain?

  • @shame2189
    @shame2189 5 лет назад +413

    "Dobby only meant to maim or, seriously injure"
    Too bad this is probably the funniest line in the entire franchise. Not a lot of humor in these movies, but when there is it's executed very well.

    • @jamesluqqy3697
      @jamesluqqy3697 5 лет назад +11

      Yeah honestly. The books at least were amusing

    • @kallimaynard2358
      @kallimaynard2358 5 лет назад +21

      I'm sorry there wasn't a lot of laughs in literal nazi wizard englandy for you

    • @aaabattery4608
      @aaabattery4608 5 лет назад +33

      What about when Fred and George turn into Harry with poly juice potion and say “Wow! We’re identical!”

    • @evatheunderrated3734
      @evatheunderrated3734 4 года назад +11

      What about any scene with Fred and George besides Fred’s death

    • @shame2189
      @shame2189 4 года назад +3

      @@evatheunderrated3734 you're right, i totally forgot about "i'm all ears"!

  • @nate4238
    @nate4238 6 лет назад +269

    5:35 I get the sinning here, but the Obliviate spell was used in Chamber of Secrets when Lockhart was going to wipe Harry and Ron's memories.

    • @alexisgiannoutsos8859
      @alexisgiannoutsos8859 4 года назад +6

      Finallyy I knew someone must have noticed

    • @YourThirdNut
      @YourThirdNut 4 года назад

      I rewatched this video after a few months and saw this sin. I came to the comments looking for this and you, good sir, made me happy.

    • @Dingooose
      @Dingooose 3 года назад +1

      Why was lockhart

    • @bleachandtidepodsbye887
      @bleachandtidepodsbye887 2 года назад

      @@Dingooose Harry and Ron found out Lockhart was a fraud and they forced him down into the chamber of secrets and Ron asked "is there anything you can do?" And Lockhart was skilled in memory charms so he was going to obliviate Ron and Harry and say they went insane when they saw Ginnys mangled body but Lockhart used Ron wand which was broken earlier so the obliviate charm bounced off and instead of hitting Ron it hit Lockhart himself and now Lockhart is in a wizard hospice place for people who's spells went wrong

    • @Dingooose
      @Dingooose 2 года назад

      @@bleachandtidepodsbye887 no I meant like why was Lockhart a thing? what was his purpose? Why did he get as much screentime as he did if the only thing he ultimately accomplishes is getting ron stuck with him in the chamber so harry can have his moment and defeat the big bad snake himself.

  • @toshley6192
    @toshley6192 8 лет назад +634

    Apparate and Disapparate both refer to the same act, but the proper usage depends on whether you are departing or arriving. You arrive by apparating at a location, while you depart by disapparating.

    • @RuberDildo
      @RuberDildo 8 лет назад +46

      Anyone should know that just by comparing them to the words "appear" and "disappear", lol.

    • @richieangel8150
      @richieangel8150 8 лет назад +15

      Same principle as the difference between emigrating and immigrating.

    • @twoshu8940
      @twoshu8940 8 лет назад +16

      Ryan Gerhard but technically by apparating you are doing both at the same time

    • @toshley6192
      @toshley6192 8 лет назад +7

      FurReal Gaming In the books it is explained that apparating is not an instantaneous transportation, but it takes a couple seconds. So you disapparate from a place, and apparate at another place a few seconds later.

    • @Book-xc9xo
      @Book-xc9xo 8 лет назад +2

      Ryan Gerhard NEEERRRDDDD ALERT! NEEERRRDDDD ALERT! Jk I am a nerd too

  • @natanfk2
    @natanfk2 6 лет назад +520

    About sin 13: Hagrid is actually less likely to be taking Harry, because, well, he can barely use magic. The movie doesn't explain this, but it's pretty logical that Voldemort might consider that the real Harry would be protected by powerful aurors/wizards (Moody, Kingsley, Tonks, Lupin, etc.), and not... well, Hagrid. That's actually what Moody thought as well, and that's why the real Harry went it Hagrid.
    That's why Voldemort went straight after Moody (and killing him), allowing the real Harry to escape with Hagrid until Hedwig showed up (or Harry used Expelliarmus in the books)

    • @CalumHGaming
      @CalumHGaming 6 лет назад +11

      I never really thought about that but now that makes perfect sense

    • @Darkgun231
      @Darkgun231 6 лет назад +22

      And this is why Moldy is an idiot. He got outfoxed by a man known to be super paranoid and a group of teens, when we're told he was basically an evil Hermione back in school, but with charisma. Seriously, did all of his intelligence get cut in half every time he made a horcrux? Probably. Would explain his stupidity throughout the whole series.

    • @barrylyndon5552
      @barrylyndon5552 5 лет назад +1

      It also essentially worked as Voldemort went right for Moony. Mundungus and Hedwig screwed it up a bit but it still saved Harry from trying to deal with the entire journey being tailed by Volde who would have wrecked him and anyone he was with.

    • @geeswithane7yrago303
      @geeswithane7yrago303 5 лет назад +4

      He can use magic as much as a normal wizard. But he just doesn't know as much spells. Cause he got expelled by year 2

    • @astrax2426
      @astrax2426 5 лет назад +2

      Tonks wasn't likely you can't compare Tonks to Alastor or Kingsley.

  • @Marteh
    @Marteh 5 лет назад +258

    The Death Eaters knew they were there because Hermione said "Voldemort"
    Voldemort was able to track people down who spoke that name.
    You may noticed that right after Hermione said Voldemort, the Death Eaters came walking in a few seconds later.
    This also when they where at Lovegood's, when he said "Voldemort" they immediately came flying to them.

    • @areyouscaredyet6916
      @areyouscaredyet6916 5 лет назад +27

      Again, books mentioned that, not the movies. He doesn't care about the Books. You shouldn't have to read the books to understand something. Movie should explain it.

    • @tej_1420
      @tej_1420 4 года назад +11

      DeadlyPandaArmy but the thing is if you pay attention to what they say. You can pick that up on your own with self awareness. Never read the books but i love all the movies

    • @TheSagesSon
      @TheSagesSon 4 года назад +3

      Marteh, thank you for picking up in this stuff he obviously isnt, I think he just likes to sin randomly

    • @AlbertoDsign
      @AlbertoDsign 4 года назад +1

      @@TheSagesSon How would you pick someone that's not explained anywhere, is not obvius, and is inconsistent with the rest of movies?

    • @TheSagesSon
      @TheSagesSon 4 года назад +1

      @@AlbertoDsign the first scene where the death waters cane in was left to be seen as chance but all should be understood when live good called them to his house by saying his name

  • @liamcoburn5321
    @liamcoburn5321 7 лет назад +546

    The Emperor: ruled the Galaxy for like 20 years
    Soron: almost took over the world twice
    Voldemort: tried to take over a magic school, and failed

    • @zaidabraham7310
      @zaidabraham7310 7 лет назад +61

      Well, Voldemort did take over the British Ministry of Magic, and Hogwarts was a hub of the resistance/rebels at that moment in time. And still, Voldemort only lost because of some stupid technicality.

    • @shreyasingh117
      @shreyasingh117 7 лет назад +36

      Voldemort had taken over the world before he tried to kill Harry. I am saying world because he terrorized muggles and wizards alike. You do realize Voldemort is like in his 60s? He has been around for quite some time. He was gone for barely 14 years and when he returns we get a glimpse of how bad things were in the last 2 books. It's like Hitler in Nazi Germany and there are literal witch hunts going on. People are tortured and killed for no good reason except for the fact that they are 'Mudbloods' or 'Mudblood sympathizers' (Charity Burbage).

    • @kennygemmoon1955
      @kennygemmoon1955 7 лет назад +13

      Had to google who Soron is

    • @MickaCrespo
      @MickaCrespo 7 лет назад

      Mr. Pinecone I

    • @bjkwolf9578
      @bjkwolf9578 7 лет назад +11

      Mr. Pinecone Sauron..... But yes lol. Good point

  • @legreatpenguino445
    @legreatpenguino445 8 лет назад +2450

    And this is why the books are superior. Most of the sins with the movie are well explained in the books. The movies just let shit happen assuming everyone read the books

    • @macklyon7476
      @macklyon7476 7 лет назад +125

      Also most of the sins are explained if you actually watch the movies as well and read the books. If you do both, then 99.9% of the sins are explained.

    • @phillippie9737
      @phillippie9737 7 лет назад +23

      My Back Tickles I Think Im a Super Saiyan yeah but you have to say that the battle for Hogwarts is way better in the movie

    • @dawb870
      @dawb870 7 лет назад +32

      Have you read the books? And why come to a comment like this just to hate on HP? Its not full of plot holes. Sure, its convenient at times, but convenience is not the same as plot holes. List 5, heck, even 1 technical plot hole in the books (because the movies are inaccurate).

    • @turdy_water7646
      @turdy_water7646 7 лет назад +2

      _ _
      J
      ^ L(O-OL)

    • @toridemars1993
      @toridemars1993 7 лет назад +4

      My Back Tickles I Think Im a Super Saiyan THANK YOU

  • @zombonline
    @zombonline 9 лет назад +667

    They say that "Oblivate" is invented for this movie yet it was used by Lockhart in book 2 and I'm sure the movie aswell though he may not have spoken the incantation.

    • @zombonline
      @zombonline 9 лет назад +27

      Yeah exactly, so it's always been part of the story.

    • @AnnaHandle
      @AnnaHandle 9 лет назад +6

      Mr Zombly Nope, he used Amnesia

    • @zombonline
      @zombonline 9 лет назад +34

      Creamshaker Not sure if extremely bad joke or plain stupidity...

    • @melons1994
      @melons1994 9 лет назад +19

      Mr Zombly You're correct, he says it aloud while in the chamber of secrets (in the movie and the book)

    • @zombonline
      @zombonline 9 лет назад +7

      Thanks melons1994, so -1 sin? xD

  • @lucastarr5883
    @lucastarr5883 4 года назад +31

    2:45 I thought this was clever. She's cleaning her own pots and pans despite not having to because she's experiencing anxiety and trying to distract herself by actually doing something

  • @jaredhardegree8377
    @jaredhardegree8377 9 лет назад +263

    You know those motorcycles that wake you up going down your street, but you never look at them? Totally. Hagrid explained.

    • @MrFrancesc11
      @MrFrancesc11 9 лет назад +23

      OH MY GOD IT ALL MAKES SENSE

    • @jaredhardegree8377
      @jaredhardegree8377 9 лет назад

      Yep.

    • @carinaellefson8902
      @carinaellefson8902 9 лет назад +7

      +Rogue Sierra I read this and thought about every time I've heard a motorcycle drive by my house and realized that I have NEVER looked to see who or what it was. :o That is SO weird!

    • @manwynaut
      @manwynaut 9 лет назад +14

      +Carina Ellefson I'll look every time from now on and have my phone ready to send you guys a picture.
      Damn neighbors were wizards this whole time...

    • @carinaellefson8902
      @carinaellefson8902 9 лет назад +1

      Lol we are going to prove that wizards are real!

  • @huckleberryhammer8243
    @huckleberryhammer8243 8 лет назад +224

    Handed to them on a Harryplatter so they can advance the Harryplotter!😂

  • @plasmatic3223
    @plasmatic3223 8 лет назад +491

    Hermione: "I am doing everything I ca..."
    Harry: "YOU'RE NOT DOING ENOUGH!"
    Hermione: "Harry, eat Snickers?"
    Harry: "Why?"
    Hermione: "You aren't you when your hungry."
    (Harry eats Snickers)
    Hermione: "Better?"
    Harry: "Loads..."

    • @dbseamz
      @dbseamz 7 лет назад +2

      Some Kruddy Krabcake oh dear

    • @turdy_water7646
      @turdy_water7646 7 лет назад +21

      LUPIN WAS RIGHT CHOCOLATE DOES HELP !!!!!

    • @shooa8019
      @shooa8019 7 лет назад +4

      Lupin was right about chocolate..

    • @lokimus1c629
      @lokimus1c629 7 лет назад +3

      This made my day lol I fits so well

    • @syfilen
      @syfilen 7 лет назад +4

      Add: Deleted Scene includes
      Hermione: "I am doing everything I ca..."
      Harry: "YOU'RE NOT DOING ENOUGH!"
      Hermione: "Harry, eat Snickers?"
      Harry: "Why?"
      Hermione: "You aren't you when your hungry."
      (Harry eats Snickers)
      Hermione: "Better?"
      Harry: "Loads..."

  • @ariel_warfare
    @ariel_warfare 5 лет назад +269

    12:14 Did you miss the scene before this one where Ron says there's a taboo on Voldemort's name? That's how they were found in the cafe.

    • @whatever8241
      @whatever8241 5 лет назад +44

      Ariel Warfare it’s a deleted scene

    • @Jj-er2lz
      @Jj-er2lz 4 года назад +4

      Harry and Hermione didn't know that

    • @Kylehappy305
      @Kylehappy305 4 года назад +8

      @@whatever8241 Of course 2 films almost over 2 hours long needs to delete scenes in a near 700 page book
      Had they learned nothing from Order Of Phoinex about cutting out stuff

    • @NagatoUzu
      @NagatoUzu 4 года назад +1

      there was also a trace on Voldemort's name, but that was never mentioned in the films.

    • @Thepotatoz.
      @Thepotatoz. 4 года назад +4

      @@NagatoUzu that's... The taboo.....

  • @shenanigaming6016
    @shenanigaming6016 9 лет назад +338

    Everything Wrong With Everything Wrong With Harry Potter & The Deathly Hallows Part 1:
    2:16 - Not even a Sin for Hedwig's death?
    11:28 - On the subject of Chamber of Secrets "...couldn't he have at least left a riddle" WAHAY
    12:00 - Illuminati unconfirmed
    12:19 - And our sponsor for the day is...
    12:28 - Illuminati STILL unconfirmed
    15:03 - Illum.... you know what? Fuck it.
    18:33 - No sympathy for Dobby.
    0:00 - 21:08 - Not enough Hermione
    Sin Count:8
    Conclusion: I should find better things to do with my time.

  • @Onmysheet
    @Onmysheet 6 лет назад +297

    Hermonie is definitely old enough to be hot in this movie.
    Minus 169 sins!

    • @andrewaftontheandroidhedge2780
      @andrewaftontheandroidhedge2780 4 года назад +7

      remove the 1

    • @IPeakedAt15
      @IPeakedAt15 4 года назад

      andrew Afton the hedgehog is funtime golden sonic no the 168

    • @IPeakedAt15
      @IPeakedAt15 4 года назад

      andrew Afton the hedgehog is funtime golden sonic did you delete the other reply? And yes I noticed that I was saying remove 168 so there was one and that one is then credits

    • @andrewaftontheandroidhedge2780
      @andrewaftontheandroidhedge2780 4 года назад

      @@IPeakedAt15 no i didnt delete the reply

    • @IPeakedAt15
      @IPeakedAt15 4 года назад

      andrew Afton the hedgehog is funtime golden sonic it’s not there anymore

  • @TheBc99
    @TheBc99 8 лет назад +212

    They can't say Voldemort in this movie because the Voldemort-controlled ministry put a "taboo" spell on the word so that anyone who says it (who is probably going to be part of the resistance) can be immediately tracked down. Problem is, they don't mention the taboo at all in the movie, so I don't know why they went halfway on this detail.

    • @shaneebahera8566
      @shaneebahera8566 8 лет назад

      +Benjamin Rome Clarke but they not havent been saying his name before voldermort and his goons took over the ministry

    • @TheBc99
      @TheBc99 8 лет назад +9

      Shanee Bahera Yeah, they did: Harry and Hermione have always said it because they weren't raised to fear it, and Dumbledore's Army and the Order of the Phoenix said it out of defiance. That's what makes it such a perfect word to put the taboo spell on.

    • @DigiDestined13
      @DigiDestined13 8 лет назад +16

      Unfortunately, the film DID include the "Voldemort's name is Taboo" scene... it just got edited out during post. If you go into the DVD's deleted scenes or watch the full thing on Freeform, the scene is there. Just another scene that they should never have cut. That happens a lot in this series.

    • @TheBc99
      @TheBc99 8 лет назад

      saturn0205 Huh, I didn't know that. Makes sense why they kept it in then.

    • @KingSchnarf
      @KingSchnarf 8 лет назад +1

      They did, but deleted it, unfortunately

  • @TheyTruN
    @TheyTruN 5 лет назад +297

    85: it’s pretty well established that NON verbal spell are a thing in the books

    • @lunari2939
      @lunari2939 5 лет назад +5

      Half blood prince, boom

    • @PrimDidEverythingWrong
      @PrimDidEverythingWrong 5 лет назад +51

      trey
      Yeah, but this isn’t the book. It’s the movies.

    • @phillipjackson3498
      @phillipjackson3498 4 года назад +1

      Plus Wandless Magic

    • @chupapi7620
      @chupapi7620 4 года назад +1

      But why do they say there spells if they can choose not too? Whats the point?

    • @cjanie19
      @cjanie19 4 года назад +3

      You know what we say about books round here

  • @Deuce1042
    @Deuce1042 9 лет назад +131

    Again...I have NO IDEA why it's so difficult to grasp that some spells (provided a significant level of skill) don't actually require saying the incantation. I didn't even have to read the books to know that.

    • @prosincr
      @prosincr 9 лет назад +8

      Well, it's never explained, and that still doesn't make any sense. How does the wand know what to do if you don't say anything?

    • @oldschool90s33
      @oldschool90s33 9 лет назад +5

      Dilip Tien read the sixth book

    • @SaintPandemonium
      @SaintPandemonium 9 лет назад +7

      +Dilip Tien It's called non-verbal magic. A wizard's thoughts can produce magic effectively through wands as much as speaking them.

    • @ripLunarBirdCLH
      @ripLunarBirdCLH 9 лет назад +4

      +Nonya Buissness It *IS* explained in "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince" movie, you idiot. At least watch the fucking movies before you criticize one of the movies in the series.

    • @commandercorner5575
      @commandercorner5575 9 лет назад +4

      +Nonya Buissness I wasn't commenting on an illiterate, I was commenting on you, who made no indication of speaking on behalf of the illiterate, like some hobo Lorax. I'm not "butthurt", I find it incredibly irritating when someone asks a question, is provided the answer and the source, then continues to complain despite the fact that someone else took the time to answer what a simple Google search could have provided.

  • @limettenkuchen
    @limettenkuchen 8 лет назад +159

    Molly hates Twilight, that's why she killed Bella.

    • @alexceous
      @alexceous 7 лет назад +1

      Laura lololololololollloolloolololol

    • @shooa8019
      @shooa8019 7 лет назад +1

      She would've killed Cedric too, I guess..

    • @alexceous
      @alexceous 7 лет назад +1

      Your Cute Savage
      Warner Bros:Yeah but...
      Me:SILENCE Molly should have killed Bella and Cedric

    • @shooa8019
      @shooa8019 7 лет назад

      Kylo455 Plays lol

    • @csharkop
      @csharkop 7 лет назад +1

      who dosent hate twilight

  • @choubatsu5860
    @choubatsu5860 6 лет назад +104

    I want to point out that obliviate was actually used in the second movie. I mean its not like Gilderoy Lockhart screamed it or anything...
    \

    • @Mqtisse
      @Mqtisse 4 года назад +2

      yeah but he doesnt remember

  • @bellaroy2418
    @bellaroy2418 4 года назад +113

    15:28 “Ron betrays the Harry Potter series by saying,”Twilight is better.” I bet he’s even on team Jacob,the bastard.” I’m wheezing 😂😂🤣🤣

  • @lorraine4786
    @lorraine4786 8 лет назад +225

    They started calling him You-Know-Who because the ministry started tracking people whenever they say it, I'm pretty sure.

    • @emc246
      @emc246 8 лет назад +10

      Yes, a spell was attached to Voldemort's name. Anyone who said it would be located immediately.

    • @jojo_is_a_go5893
      @jojo_is_a_go5893 8 лет назад

      Lorraine Hackett in part two of this video he sins it again for the same reason.

    • @lorraine4786
      @lorraine4786 8 лет назад

      Jojo_is_a_GO That's the only one I haven't seen.

    • @smegmeakipper4331
      @smegmeakipper4331 8 лет назад +7

      Seems to me they should have also tracked anyone saying 'You-Know-Who' as well then. How the hell would that kind of tracking work anyway?

    • @catherinedo5549
      @catherinedo5549 8 лет назад +7

      Smeg Me a Kipper they only did it for the name Voldemort because only people who were bravest and most likely to rival against him would dare say the name

  • @richardcavanagh
    @richardcavanagh 7 лет назад +99

    Obliviate was used in the Chamber of secrets by Lockhart; this isn't the first time.

  • @ShamaAlkubaisi
    @ShamaAlkubaisi 8 лет назад +439

    i just realized that the deathly hallows take place in the years 1997 & 1998 but in the movies when they apperate it clearly shows 2010 london with all the screens and modern technology !! THEY GOT THE TIMEFRAME WRONG

    • @lordtullus9942
      @lordtullus9942 8 лет назад +9

      No, it doesn't.

    • @ShamaAlkubaisi
      @ShamaAlkubaisi 8 лет назад +3

      Lord Tullus 9 what doesnt?

    • @lordtullus9942
      @lordtullus9942 8 лет назад +2

      Shama AlAli The books don't take place in 1998

    • @ShamaAlkubaisi
      @ShamaAlkubaisi 8 лет назад +1

      Lord Tullus 9 i googled it and it says that j.k said that but might be wrong. i was just wondering when did it take place?

    • @elviskiarie1068
      @elviskiarie1068 8 лет назад +97

      Lord Tullus 9 But... they do. Harry was born in 1980, which means the movies take place in the '90s.

  • @bekinibottom
    @bekinibottom 5 лет назад +1290

    I love that almost all of these are answered in the books 😂😂😂

    • @egyptian_noob
      @egyptian_noob 5 лет назад +44

      Bek Grace yeah the movies suck

    • @egyptian_noob
      @egyptian_noob 5 лет назад +49

      Thor Odinson compared to the books

    • @chaddon7685
      @chaddon7685 5 лет назад +78

      @@egyptian_noob They should have made this a tv series. After book 3, the books just get too deep.

    • @nb73950
      @nb73950 5 лет назад +3

      Exactly what I was thinking lol

    • @ecologist_to_be
      @ecologist_to_be 5 лет назад +10

      Sadly many have only watched the films 😱

  • @SylentVoidkeeper
    @SylentVoidkeeper 6 лет назад +1232

    I understand a lot of these sins, since Harry Potter is usually the king of plot convenience.
    But for a lot of these, it just seems like you weren't paying attention.

    • @videnobuoka3475
      @videnobuoka3475 6 лет назад +68

      He usually doesn't

    • @Dartitis-26
      @Dartitis-26 6 лет назад +157

      Well, at first I thought you're right. And reading and knowing the books, you ARE right. Some (not all) of the sins can actually be explained by reading and understanding the books, e. g. Hermione using Obliviate to her parents (they don't just stay in their house like in the movie, they actually thought they are different people living in Australia).
      But this is only about MOVIE sins. And the movies explain shit if you ask me. Most of those sins seem a little wrong as a Harry Potter fan but if you've never read the books, you wouldn't know all those stuff. So, it's movie sins, not book sins.

    • @videnobuoka3475
      @videnobuoka3475 6 лет назад +10

      did you even read the latter part of the comment?

    • @oliviachainey7029
      @oliviachainey7029 6 лет назад +17

      Yeah just like the obliviate was mentioned in chamber of secrets

    • @casperhong7745
      @casperhong7745 6 лет назад +30

      something that bugged me is that the only reason why harry and Hermione couldn't say Voldemort's name is because the death eaters or Voldemort himself cursed it so anyone who said his name could be tracked down immediately. I just wanted to say that

  • @williamschubert868
    @williamschubert868 6 лет назад +124

    "he could have left a riddle" a TOOOOOOOOOOOOMMM riddle

  • @Syrange13
    @Syrange13 9 лет назад +197

    Sorry, but this video is sinful as fuck. A lot of the things you complain about are either based on assumptions, wildly inaccurate, or about things that are explained later on.

    • @DrewSch21
      @DrewSch21 9 лет назад +144

      Syrange13 Hi. Welcome to Cinema Sins. Enjoy your stay.

    • @awesomemark1234100
      @awesomemark1234100 9 лет назад +123

      This movie is wildly inaccurate plus cinemasins is all about exaggerating minor things so stop whining

    • @16m49x3
      @16m49x3 9 лет назад +8

      Syrange13 I agree some of the sins are stupid and only based on what he likes or not, or just to make a gag.
      But really most of the things he mention are big issues with the movie

    • @Syrange13
      @Syrange13 9 лет назад +9

      It's still a pretty good video all-in-all, even though I liked this movie (I'm still a HP fan at heart, and compared to what they did to 6, this one is quite presentable.). The main one I have a problem with is the holo-deer and sword thing. You'd have to be extremely stupid to assume that those were just randomly there and won't be explained.

    • @BigGarthVadar
      @BigGarthVadar 9 лет назад +4

      Syrange13 Wow, really? You clearly don'y understand this channel.

  • @domiiinik99
    @domiiinik99 5 лет назад +50

    5:35 But in the Chamber Of Secrets Lockhart used it on himself, thanks to Ron's damaged wand

  • @laurawhite9822
    @laurawhite9822 9 лет назад +226

    Everybody stop complaining that the book explains all the sins away. A good movie should be able to stand on its own.

    • @mschnei563
      @mschnei563 9 лет назад +9

      If they would want to explain everything, the film would have a much longer duration

    • @fissilewhistle
      @fissilewhistle 8 лет назад +17

      +Martin Schneider I'd rather have a good long movie than a short bad one.

    • @TheLegend-hv7so
      @TheLegend-hv7so 8 лет назад +10

      KamektheMagikoopa1 how lord of the rings also had plotholes and its 4 hours

    • @ellie9248
      @ellie9248 8 лет назад

      Agreed!

    • @firetie
      @firetie 8 лет назад

      Agreed. It even says the books don't matter!!!!!

  • @PittsburghSportsFan43
    @PittsburghSportsFan43 7 лет назад +92

    Was I the only one who figured out that R.A.B. was Sirius's brother while I was reading HBP? If someone took your liver, you'd be dead. Can't live without them. Could lose a kidney though. Hermione wore perfume to the wedding. They weren't planning on leaving til the next day. Hermione grabbed their bags just in case they had to run.

    • @itasavitri22
      @itasavitri22 6 лет назад +2

      I figured it out after watching HBP the movie (I read the book before)

    • @ZakX11
      @ZakX11 6 лет назад +6

      Why cant there be a spell to remove ur perfume smell ? Or to keep you warm ? Literally almost all of their inconveniences can be fixed by just making up spells or using spells that theyve already used previously. Thats the problem with universes like these , if the author can make up spells according to plot convenience, why can't I ?

    • @Onmysheet
      @Onmysheet 6 лет назад +1

      I figured out who The Half Blood Prince was whilst reading the book. The handwriting and were the potions book was were big giveaways.

    • @shillin65
      @shillin65 6 лет назад +1

      lol I figured it out too

    • @PittsburghSportsFan43
      @PittsburghSportsFan43 6 лет назад +2

      @@Onmysheet Not the Half Blood Prince. I was talking about R.A.B., the guy who tried to destroy the locket. It was Sirius's brother. Regulus Arcturus Black. (I probably misspelled it, but oh well.) After I read the sixth book I went back to the fifth and reread Harry and Sirius's conversation, then knew who that was.

  • @SohamMukherjeee
    @SohamMukherjeee 9 лет назад +358

    C'mon, ya gotta give Rowling some credit; she made a character that everyone could not like at all: Dolores Umbridge.

    • @SohamMukherjeee
      @SohamMukherjeee 9 лет назад +58

      I don't even care if she was some crazy cat lady or whatever; hated her more than Voldemort.

    • @tanvideshpande1581
      @tanvideshpande1581 9 лет назад

      Watch Malificent. The actor for umbridge cares for a child!!!
      🌟Have a magical day!✨See you at Hogwarts!🔮

    • @SohamMukherjeee
      @SohamMukherjeee 9 лет назад +1

      Tanvi Deshpande What?!

    • @kempa95
      @kempa95 9 лет назад

      Soham Mukherjee I liked her! I was almost rooting for her xD

    • @SohamMukherjeee
      @SohamMukherjeee 9 лет назад

      We all go a little mad sometimes
      -U DAI-

  • @dougwalker4313
    @dougwalker4313 5 лет назад +484

    Did you just call Hedwig a he?

    • @InnocentC0
      @InnocentC0 5 лет назад +43

      The book protray Hedwig as female. But, in the movie, they have to use male Owl. Because it's prettier.
      That's what I heard.

    • @hassantarekkamel
      @hassantarekkamel 5 лет назад +55

      obviously Hedwig is a hoo

    • @paxxishere7932
      @paxxishere7932 5 лет назад +10

      Hedwig is a SHE

    • @Thee_kane
      @Thee_kane 4 года назад +5

      Hassan Kamel grade A reply

    • @leviackerman7992
      @leviackerman7992 4 года назад +12

      @@InnocentC0 they pronounce hedwig "she" in the movie to . Harry says in chamber of secrets to uncle Vernon " but she is bored, if I could take her out, for an hour"

  • @ianirungu3659
    @ianirungu3659 6 лет назад +53

    8:21 Hermione literally used that spell 'Finite Incantatem' in Chamber of Secrets to destroy the rogue bludger in Harry's quidditch match; How does Yaxley not know it?

    • @Julian-pw5mv
      @Julian-pw5mv 4 года назад +8

      Its probably not that he doesnt, more that he is lazy or doesnt have time. I assume you dont have to clean your own office eventhough you know how to use a vacuum...

  • @SleepinGriffin
    @SleepinGriffin 6 лет назад +333

    Previous video: Sinned for using magic without a wand
    This video: Sinned for NOT using magic without a wand.

    • @ZakX11
      @ZakX11 6 лет назад +44

      Exactly the kind of inconsistency due to which both of them are sinned

    • @joseprados7441
      @joseprados7441 6 лет назад +18

      He sinned not using it because it has now been presented as an option.

    • @aaronbradley3232
      @aaronbradley3232 6 лет назад

      And?

    • @nateofalltrades1448
      @nateofalltrades1448 6 лет назад +1

      What?

    • @venway5465
      @venway5465 6 лет назад +12

      Aaron Bradley god damn dude, there is something seriously wrong with you !

  • @senseiskyrim2503
    @senseiskyrim2503 7 лет назад +336

    CinemaSins continuously refers to Hedwig as a male when she is in fact female, which there is no justification for since in several movies and right after the mystery question for idenfication sin in this movie Harry says "She was trying to protect me." *Ding*

    • @tsriketwm7274
      @tsriketwm7274 7 лет назад +5

      Sensei Skyrim huh. Well there’s a sin we can give without going all potterhead

    • @blazebeargv9463
      @blazebeargv9463 6 лет назад

      How dare you, you know I don't know what half of those words mean

    • @vampiraJ
      @vampiraJ 6 лет назад +2

      El Padre con Verga Larga Hedwig has always been a female owl.

    • @Katiekooleyes
      @Katiekooleyes 6 лет назад

      Even in the second movie Harry calls Hedwig a he, when he's trying to explain to his uncle that he (hedwig's) bored and needs to be let out his cage.

    • @michaelcheng1958
      @michaelcheng1958 6 лет назад +1

      Yet the owl that played Hedwig in the movies was male.

  • @valencia878
    @valencia878 5 лет назад +905

    This is how many times I yelled "IF YOU READ THE BOOKS!!!"😂

    • @scipio764
      @scipio764 5 лет назад +68

      "Books don't fucking matter"
      Cinemasin - Everything wrong with Cinemasin.

    • @12shecat2
      @12shecat2 5 лет назад +3

      This movie is very close too the books. the last two books were bad. seriously bad. The books should be sinned

    • @alexmargetta6680
      @alexmargetta6680 5 лет назад +15

      Half of his sin would be taken off if he read the books but it is called Cinema sins

    • @gnammyhamster9554
      @gnammyhamster9554 5 лет назад +36

      @@12shecat2 it's still a sin if the movie doesn't explain it

    • @confusedlemur12
      @confusedlemur12 5 лет назад +28

      Everyone complaining "if you read the books!!!" When the channel is "cinema sins" not "book sins"

  • @fred9136
    @fred9136 9 лет назад +304

    I'm pretty sure Obliviate was gunna be used in the chamber of secrets by Lockheart to make everyone forget what a bitch he was but because he used Rons' broken want it backfired. Not 100% sure on this...

    • @IchHassePasswoerter
      @IchHassePasswoerter 9 лет назад +65

      fred9136 It was. It is also used by the Departmant for Magical Catastrophes (or however its called) to oblivate muggles who ahve seen magic.

    • @Wolfsgeist
      @Wolfsgeist 9 лет назад +1

      fred9136 That was Amnesia

    • @IchHassePasswoerter
      @IchHassePasswoerter 9 лет назад

      ***** It falls under oblivation speels too. It's just not as selective.

    • @yamiryushi
      @yamiryushi 9 лет назад +4

      fred9136 Yes it is what happens. Seriously, the amount of people that are too lazy to read the book that covers almost all the plot holes the movies show is astronomical lol

    • @GallopingGepard
      @GallopingGepard 9 лет назад +1

      fred9136 Read the books :-)

  • @Epags1996
    @Epags1996 9 лет назад +474

    I know they say the books don't matter, but the movie was made so bad, the book explains almost 99% of all the shit they brought up.

    • @JW_Steed
      @JW_Steed 9 лет назад +122

      Epags Gamer That's the point. If the movies can't be understood without the books, it's still sin-able.

    • @Epags1996
      @Epags1996 9 лет назад +37

      ***** Yea I know that, that is what I am saying, the movie is a horrible interpretation of the book

    • @freezinfeet
      @freezinfeet 9 лет назад +9

      Epags Gamer i dare you to try and make a movie that explains as much as book like harry potter, and game of thrones into about an hour- two hours for each book without it being bored

    • @Epags1996
      @Epags1996 9 лет назад +28

      freezinfeet Few key points they shouldn't explain. Trace ends at age 17, harry can't cast spells until that. Wealsy house had protection, the minister could get in bc he was the fucking minister. Spells can be cast without or with speaking. and the whole wand thing, this all could have been done in five minutes

    • @robertdavis5693
      @robertdavis5693 9 лет назад +6

      Epags Gamer Yes, but given the butchering of such important material in the previous movies... Deathly Hallows 1 & 2... in my opinion are the closest the movies have come to their book since the first movie.

  • @arvarvanwar
    @arvarvanwar 8 лет назад +241

    Voldermort didn't get caught in the power lines. There were enchantments that stopped him going further and his burst of outrage destroyed the power lines.

    • @arvarvanwar
      @arvarvanwar 8 лет назад +22

      Also, couldn't Harry have used incendio to melt the ice pool and warm the water. And they should just put the horcrux in Hermione's bag! Then Harry would have gotten the sword so easily!

    • @grellsutcliffe7637
      @grellsutcliffe7637 8 лет назад +10

      I'm fairly that incendio created fire, so it would have been quite useless. I do recall there being a spell that made heat radiate from your wand mentioned in the third book, and underwater the Incendio caused jets of boiling water to come off your wand. It would have been too hot if Harry had casted it on himself and too small amount to warm up the whole pond, though

    • @sirprize275
      @sirprize275 8 лет назад +5

      Arion Varfis-van Warmelo well that's what we're supposed to guess happened after your action seen is nothing but a gargled mess of noise and lights

    • @dbseamz
      @dbseamz 7 лет назад

      Arion Varfis-van Warmelo there's a spell mentioned in one of the books that creates a jet of hot air

    • @raulinurminen7299
      @raulinurminen7299 7 лет назад +2

      Lucius' wand backfires on Voldemort and he gets pissed off and destroys stuff around him. No need to even know about the protective spells around their house mentioned in books. CinemaSins didn't pay enough attention watching this film.

  • @Cyber_Horse_Studios87
    @Cyber_Horse_Studios87 3 года назад +15

    I remember seeing the poster for part 2 of hogwarts burning in the theater and I casually said this out loud enough in front of my sister who is a Harry Potter fan.
    “Who set the Disney castle on fire?”
    The look of pure disgust she gave me still makes me bust out laughing to this day. I was young so I didn’t know better. XD

  • @Spidey-ek4sy
    @Spidey-ek4sy 7 лет назад +78

    The reason Harry and the others don't say Voldemort is because you could get tracked by Voldemort and his death eaters.

    • @Onmysheet
      @Onmysheet 6 лет назад +11

      Yeah but the movie doesn't explain that because it doesn't exist in the movie, only in the book, and the books don't matter.

    • @CarolinnaFreire
      @CarolinnaFreire 6 лет назад +7

      Secret Guy there was a deleted scene for this. Don't know why they decided to delete it

    • @seatspud
      @seatspud 5 лет назад +1

      @Dragon meta Knight654 "Books don't matter", the perfect description of our current paradigm.
      Also, they could've called Voldy by his real name, Tom.

  • @megafoni
    @megafoni 6 лет назад +310

    DISapparating is the disappearing part and apparting is the appearing part. Pretty obvius.

    • @jordandenny6875
      @jordandenny6875 6 лет назад +15

      I think of it like emigration and immigration

    • @unrealviolet1833
      @unrealviolet1833 6 лет назад +3

      Well it’s not obvious for people who don’t speak English as a first language.

    • @sagearoon3193
      @sagearoon3193 6 лет назад +6

      That’s true, but...when u Disapparate u then apparate into the next place, so.....I guess they r sorta the same thing, soo...idk

    • @rosmiith
      @rosmiith 5 лет назад +2

      LoLouv Torres
      That’s not even an English word.

    • @barrylyndon5552
      @barrylyndon5552 5 лет назад +6

      I took it to mean if you 'apparate' you transport yourself to a place intentionally. Disapparate is disappearing from where you are. Essentially the same operation just emphasis on why it is done and whether arrival or departure is more important.

  • @stephsaguudefan1753
    @stephsaguudefan1753 8 лет назад +35

    3:29 he says "JUST apparated" the mumbling in these movies should totally get like 11 sins though. Also, they call him "you know who" in this one because if you speak his name it brings the death eaters straight to you.

    • @dedx1783
      @dedx1783 8 лет назад +7

      not mentioned in the movie

    • @stephsaguudefan1753
      @stephsaguudefan1753 8 лет назад +2

      That's literally what happens when they say his name in the diner and the death eaters come and fight them

    • @bsgrjsbrsqdbarj3900
      @bsgrjsbrsqdbarj3900 8 лет назад +1

      Stephsaguudefan yeah but that wasnt mentioned in the films

    • @yellowhouse4911
      @yellowhouse4911 8 лет назад

      Bsgrjsbr Sqdbarj it is ? several times it even happened like when lunas father says his name?

    • @bsgrjsbrsqdbarj3900
      @bsgrjsbrsqdbarj3900 8 лет назад +3

      Yellow House yes i know but they never explicitly mentioned why that happened. I guarantee like 90% of non-book readers who watched this movie will have know idea why the death eaters showed up in that scene.

  • @SethHixie
    @SethHixie 3 года назад +10

    Pretty crazy how this series went from so childlike and happy to Ron nearly bleeding to death

  • @jayce2773
    @jayce2773 9 лет назад +36

    died XD
    Harry: "Hermione, his arm!"
    You: "WHAT DO YOU THINK SHE'S ASKING YOU TO GET THE MEDICINE FOR?"

  • @spencercox7931
    @spencercox7931 7 лет назад +41

    14:23
    "I'm going to have Ron Weasley's babies" face.
    not so different from her "I'm about to cry" face, her "I'm going to skin Ron alive" face, or her "I'm so disappointed in you" face.
    which is creepy

    • @vampiraJ
      @vampiraJ 6 лет назад +1

      Spencer Cox I think you confused Emma Watson and Kristen Stewart.

    • @abcdefg2174
      @abcdefg2174 6 лет назад +1

      J Meee One overacts, one underacts. They're two sides of the same shitty coin

  • @bonjourmarlene
    @bonjourmarlene 9 лет назад +245

    The Deatheaters found the trio in the cafe because Harry said Voldemort's name. That is also the reason why they're found later on in the movie but some Deatheaters and brought to Malfoy Manor. There is a taboo on the name Voldemort, so that whenever someone says his name, Deatheaters can find these people

    • @hogfather22
      @hogfather22 9 лет назад +20

      bonjourmarlene Where, in the movies, was this mentioned at any time? Could have easily been added when Ron came back, but there was nothing at all said about it.

    • @bonjourmarlene
      @bonjourmarlene 9 лет назад +36

      hogfather22 I know, unfortunately. It IS a movie sin, but I wanted to say it for people who'd only seen the movies & not read the books.

    • @tjv323
      @tjv323 9 лет назад +5

      hogfather22 Hermione mentions it one time in part 1

    • @athena2483
      @athena2483 9 лет назад +3

      +tjv323 Really? Which part?

    • @tjv323
      @tjv323 9 лет назад +5

      Turned it on to find the spot. I was a bit wrong, it was Ron who said it. About half-way through Deathly Hallows Pt.1. Just after the trio use polyjuice potion in the ministry and are in their tent.

  • @olivbress4309
    @olivbress4309 5 лет назад +50

    18:33 Actually, JK Rowling is responsible for putting Dobby in that situation.

  • @MrBlast14
    @MrBlast14 9 лет назад +201

    Am I the only one who thought Bellatrix was kinda hot? You know in that bat shit crazy kinda way

  • @astroraven0
    @astroraven0 9 лет назад +35

    I love how several of these issues are explained in the books, but of course the movies didn't put them in to "save time." Which totally explains Deathly Hallows being two parts...

    • @mexicanongames5275
      @mexicanongames5275 9 лет назад

      Astro Raven THE BOOKS DO NOT FUCKING MATTER, go check everything wrong with cinema sins jesus

    • @astroraven0
      @astroraven0 9 лет назад +15

      MexicanOnGames I did...I was pointing out how it seemed funny. Don't make assumptions, cuz guess what, you were wrong.

    • @astroraven0
      @astroraven0 9 лет назад +7

      MexicanOnGames I wasn't complaining, merely pointing out something I thought funny. *Learn to fucking see humor, Jesus*

  • @itsnotabaddick4282
    @itsnotabaddick4282 7 лет назад +48

    at number 42: They knew Harry, Ron, and Hermione were in the coffeeshop because Harry said Voldermort's name.

    • @festus9749
      @festus9749 5 лет назад +5

      But they dont explain the taboo

    • @SpaceAngelMewtwo
      @SpaceAngelMewtwo 5 лет назад

      @@festus9749 The do, just not until the scene with Mr. Lovegood.

  • @MultiAdere
    @MultiAdere 5 лет назад +16

    ''I`m going to have Ron Weasley`s babies`` face.
    I just died XDDDDDDD

  • @uwatmate1134
    @uwatmate1134 6 лет назад +614

    Sirius was his godfather not his uncle

    • @keyboardwarrior.2741
      @keyboardwarrior.2741 5 лет назад +7

      Whatever

    • @happybureaucrat1311
      @happybureaucrat1311 5 лет назад +11

      Close enough.

    • @tutiefruity1
      @tutiefruity1 5 лет назад +8

      @@happybureaucrat1311 No

    • @PittsburghSportsFan43
      @PittsburghSportsFan43 5 лет назад +13

      Well, in all fairness they did say in the books that all pureblood wizard families are related in one way or another, so Harry and Sirius likely do have some kind of biological connection through James.

    • @tutiefruity1
      @tutiefruity1 5 лет назад

      @@PittsburghSportsFan43 No

  • @chesseswar
    @chesseswar 9 лет назад +193

    THE WAND CHOOSES THE WIZARD!

    • @tanvideshpande1581
      @tanvideshpande1581 9 лет назад

      YESYEAYEA
      🌟Have a magical day!✨See you at Hogwarts!🔮

    • @IshanShah
      @IshanShah 9 лет назад

      cinema sins is op

    • @SciFiMisc
      @SciFiMisc 9 лет назад +28

      Pranav Eswaran THAT BULLSHIT DOESNT EXPLAIN WAND STDS

    • @tanvideshpande1581
      @tanvideshpande1581 9 лет назад

      ...
      🌟Have a magical day!✨See you at Hogwarts!🔮

    • @GiuliaSocolof
      @GiuliaSocolof 9 лет назад +13

      Pranav Eswaran Yeah, but don't forget that Harry can still use Hermione's wand or whatever. But 2 things: 1, to use somebody else's wand they either have to give it up willingly or defeat them in a duel/battle, and 2, you can never use somebody else's wand as well as your own because only one wand is a perfect match for a wizard

  • @it.9076
    @it.9076 7 лет назад +280

    He DID leave a riddle.... a TOM Riddle!!!

  • @MusketeerGweneth
    @MusketeerGweneth 3 года назад +14

    I have some uncomfortable questions!
    1.) Say if Nymphadora Tonks had been one of the seven Potters, would she have still been pregnant while being a seventeen year old boy?
    2.) Can Wizards then use Pollyjuice Potion to become Witches capable of becoming pregnant and Witches to become Wizards, capable of getting someone pregnant?
    3.) I also really cannot help but question how Hagrid's tiny human father managed to nail a giant? A horse and a deer are cousin species and yet cannot breed, but somehow a human and a giant can. Besides, towards the end of part 2, during the war, the giants that show up are clearly as tall as the Astronomy Tower. How does a Wizard's "secret swan" get up in there?

    • @TheCullenCoven9
      @TheCullenCoven9 6 месяцев назад

      Answers:
      1. Yes she would, the Fetus/baby doesn’t vanish, and her insides don’t change, just the outside. Like when Hermione became a cat, she didn’t swap her insides for the one of a cat, she just got a change in appearance.
      2. I think is explained by one, they keep their insides, so a man would still have his parts, even as a female I believe, and if he doesn’t, he still wouldn’t have a uterus.
      3. I don’t even want to think about it.

  • @cristina2296
    @cristina2296 7 лет назад +89

    The movies did a very bad job explaining things like for example non verbal spells. In the books, non verbal spells are taught during year 6 at Hogwarts and they are very useful because your opponent doesn't have time to defend himself. But of course in the movies that's never explained, it literally would have taken 2 minutes to explain. Ugh.

    • @Onmysheet
      @Onmysheet 6 лет назад +4

      There wasn't even a scene of Snape teaching DATDA.

    • @chrispmilk
      @chrispmilk 6 лет назад

      I agree, there were defiantly things that were left out of the movies that were important. But there were also a lot which were included. The fact is, if the movies were identical to the books, firstly it would go for about 8 hours, and secondly it would get a bit boring if it was word for word with all the same stuff. J.K Rowling has said herself that the movies don’t count as canon anyway.

    • @Onmysheet
      @Onmysheet 6 лет назад

      I understand they need to cut down on time, but they change things which is not as good as the book. In HBP they completely left out the Dursley's scene where Dumbledore visits Harry which I was looking forward to, but they replace it with a crappy cafe scene on a subway. And Dumbledore drops off Harry at the Weasley's like a dick.
      Unforgivable

    • @chrispmilk
      @chrispmilk 6 лет назад

      Secret Guy agreed.

    • @melvinloir489
      @melvinloir489 5 лет назад

      tbh you can guess that that really easily but I agree that they should have explained it

  • @LittleBigPeach
    @LittleBigPeach 8 лет назад +44

    @Sin46
    Actually it's the third time 'obliviate' is used in the series. Chamber of Secrets made rather a big deal about Gilderoy Lockhart using it to steal the stories and achivements of other wizards.
    If you're gonna be nitpicky assholes as you say, at least be nitpicky.

  • @animatedink2529
    @animatedink2529 8 лет назад +681

    Wait a sec, you mean you're NOT going to sin the fact Harry dived in BELOW ZERO WATER in Winter to retrieve the sword of Gryffindor? I mean yes, he had to get it, but no levitation spell, no magnetism spell or some spell to keep him warm while he went to retrieve it?

    • @grellsutcliffe7637
      @grellsutcliffe7637 8 лет назад +11

      Water is warmer under the ice, even though not enough for him to dive right in...

    • @kingquan3826
      @kingquan3826 8 лет назад +24

      Grell Sutcliffe you're still missing the point weather it being warmer or not .. any and I mean ANY , body of water under ice will freeze people to death.

    • @mckenzieshawcroft1470
      @mckenzieshawcroft1470 8 лет назад +97

      It's poorly explained in the movie, but to get the sword of Gryffindor, you have to perform a feat of bravery. So a spell would not work

    • @Heatherhb03
      @Heatherhb03 8 лет назад +33

      You must not live in the Midwest. We do the polar plunge-which is jumping in a hole in a frozen lake for fun. Every year.

    • @alexakel780
      @alexakel780 8 лет назад +9

      But Levitation won't work on the sword of gryffindor because it has some special powers (never specified) and I don't think there is a spell to keep you warm

  • @tayamackenzie8793
    @tayamackenzie8793 3 года назад +4

    When Dobby dies and he said “tell me about the rabbits, George.” I spit out my drink laughing 🤣

  • @Gxbbzee
    @Gxbbzee 9 лет назад +28

    just as this is uploaded my oven beeps for my pizza, what a happy coincidence :)

    • @Arko777777
      @Arko777777 9 лет назад +1

      Gibbzee Same bro. Not pizza, but some sandwiches for dinner. I'm happy that i could finish my meal with this video.

    • @cmaasland
      @cmaasland 9 лет назад +6

      Gibbzee Pizza-Ex-Machina?

    • @grtiarde9768
      @grtiarde9768 9 лет назад

      Chris Michael Aasland No, because the pizza did not cause the video too happen.

  • @mt_xing
    @mt_xing 9 лет назад +104

    I think the problem / nice thing about these movies is that they all assume you've read the books, so they don't bother repeating exposition.

    • @DrakionClaw
      @DrakionClaw 9 лет назад +14

      Mt_Xing its a problem not a nice thing, lots of people watch these films without reading the books, its not fair to them for the movie to not explain hardly anything

    • @onoproductions101
      @onoproductions101 9 лет назад +3

      drakionclawers " its not fair to them for the movie to not explain hardly anything"
      Except not really. most of these sins are really negligible to the overall story, most people wouldn't even notice them even going through multiple viewings. Also, even if they haven't read the books, I can hopefully assume most people who've watched this has watched the other movies as well. And if they were able to watch those movies and enjoy them, I dubt they really got hung up on all these little things

    • @shlatekkin
      @shlatekkin 9 лет назад +5

      onoproductions101 ive never read the books, but when watching the last 3 or 4 movies, (when they were older, wiser and fighting for their life most of the time) i always wondered why they didnt use magic more often. i didnt really remember spells like what were pointed out in this vid, but didnt they train to fight in the Room of Requirement? they should have been able to do something or at least be better prepared for an attack.

    • @astapunk
      @astapunk 9 лет назад +2

      onoproductions101 "most people wouldn't even notice them even going through multiple viewings"
      Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it actually the whole point of cinema sins ?

    • @nightmarephynix
      @nightmarephynix 9 лет назад +1

      Mt_Xing Kind of.. i read the first four books pretty well right after they came out, and even then didn't give them the attention they deserved at the time. At which point i hadn't touched them for years, the movies came out and I saw every one. I had hardly any memory of anything besides the major points, the things the movies not only brought up, but brought up well. Seeing movies Five Six and Seven everything that needed to made sense to me. It was until a year after the seventh book pt 2 came out that i re read every single one of the books, at which point i realized the movies made pretty goods cuts. There were a few things that would have been NICE to have in them, but nothing truly needed.

  • @mariathompson5104
    @mariathompson5104 8 лет назад +19

    Obliviate was used in Chamber of Secrets, it wasn't just made for this one

  • @jake4524
    @jake4524 5 лет назад +72

    "in about half a year's time, wizards used magic to repair their house" how is this a sin?

    • @chupapi7620
      @chupapi7620 4 года назад +7

      Idk, i know many sins are comedic but sins like this arnt funny or dont make sense

    • @moist_soup7215
      @moist_soup7215 4 года назад +5

      Magic should be able to do things quickly. If it can do it slow, then it can do it fast. How? MAGIC

    • @Confused__Rock
      @Confused__Rock 4 года назад +4

      I think he was sinning the emphasis put on it being destroyed in the previous installment when it didn't really end up to be of much consequence

    • @tyrannosauruszeppelin2205
      @tyrannosauruszeppelin2205 4 года назад +1

      because with magic it could be repaired in a matter of hours and not in half an year

    • @BeccaBender37
      @BeccaBender37 4 года назад +1

      magic is supposed to be fast. if it's not, why don't they repair it manually ?

  • @MrCardinal5000
    @MrCardinal5000 9 лет назад +56

    He wasn't caught in the power lines, he hit the force field surrounding the Tonks' place

    • @MrJoeyWheeler
      @MrJoeyWheeler 9 лет назад +33

      MrCardinal5000 In the book, yeah. But don't forget that in the film they thought it was a good idea to cut out everything to do with Tonks' family. Why did we need to split it in two if we weren't going to faithfully adapt the source?

    • @MrCardinal5000
      @MrCardinal5000 9 лет назад

      Damian Freeman fair enough

  • @tinawang8299
    @tinawang8299 9 лет назад +42

    I thought 'obliviate' was for removing your ENTIRE memory, not specific things.

    • @seaberry4436
      @seaberry4436 9 лет назад +2

      Wow, that must be magic!

    • @LifeofaFatMan
      @LifeofaFatMan 9 лет назад +4

      +Hermione Watson Damn it, Hermione. You're suppose to know these things...Btw will you marry me?

    • @tinawang8299
      @tinawang8299 9 лет назад +5

      +bigl4085 I've got Ron and two children!

    • @tinawang8299
      @tinawang8299 9 лет назад

      +Radioactive Blobfish and also to change their names, don't forget

    • @TekilaCocktailSuRi
      @TekilaCocktailSuRi 9 лет назад

      +Hermione Watson You can control obliviate. That's all there really is to it.

  • @renecoutoesilva5901
    @renecoutoesilva5901 8 лет назад +66

    CinemaSins, could you point us some movies with virtually no plot holes, continuity issues and unexplained shit?
    In other words, could you show us movies that went to heaven?

    • @TipHerAFish
      @TipHerAFish 8 лет назад +69

      No movie is without sin.

    • @avhotaistudios1206
      @avhotaistudios1206 8 лет назад +5

      Except Troll of course

    • @Shala69
      @Shala69 8 лет назад +20

      If I could, I would make a movie without NO SIN, just to annoy Cinema Sins. But hey, they're such big assholes that they would find one. "The credits are too short. Ding!"

    • @CTed15
      @CTed15 8 лет назад

      oh my goooooooooooooooood

    • @twoshu8940
      @twoshu8940 8 лет назад

      Renê Couto e Silva that doesn't exist

  • @shortstackedimagination
    @shortstackedimagination 5 лет назад +69

    I SWEAR You Say "Ex-Machina" Every Episode lol

  • @annalien4851
    @annalien4851 9 лет назад +89

    THE BOOKS DO NOT MATTER!!!!
    THE BOOKS DO NOT MATTER!!!!
    THE BOOKS DO NOT MATTER!!!!
    If the movie doesn't explain it, then it's a sin! If you have to read the books to understand, then its a sin! What is so hard to understand?!

    • @NIGHTSTALKER973
      @NIGHTSTALKER973 9 лет назад +1

      Annalien but for the simple sins like the non verbal spell casting and the portkey and the minister of magic being able to apparate into the weaslys protection barrier at their house it is so easily explained through the books or the harry potter wiki

    • @AlphaKnight708
      @AlphaKnight708 9 лет назад +18

      Dominik Doherty I will repeat what he said earlier.
      THE BOOKS DO NOT MATTER!!!!
      THE BOOKS DO NOT MATTER!!!!
      THE BOOKS DO NOT MATTER!!!!
      If i need to look up something that you left out in your movie, thats their fault, not mine.

    • @itheinternet6741
      @itheinternet6741 9 лет назад

      Go fuck your self

    • @darksloth8707
      @darksloth8707 9 лет назад +1

      AlphaKnight708 Do you want to sit through a 4 hour long movie? Thats what would have to happen to have book adaptations stand alone. If you dont like to read then thats fine, but the movies are made for the general public, not just the books fans, so they have to be shorter. The books do matter, if you dont want to better understand a movie because you refuse to read, than thats on you not them.

    • @AlphaKnight708
      @AlphaKnight708 9 лет назад +2

      Dark Sloth If they can't properly explain to the audience what thing just happened, then that thing should not be in the movie. I don't care if the movie is nothing like the book, as long as it's a good movie.

  • @CallumLerigo
    @CallumLerigo 9 лет назад +382

    So I could explain 99% of the stuff you complained about by explaining the books but these films just thought "meh fuck it, put in this with no explanation as to how/why it works so any poor bastard who hasn't read the books has to". :p

    • @joTheBonas
      @joTheBonas 9 лет назад +20

      Callum Lerigo you could argue the movies are just for the fans, and there are a lot of fans, but its also rights thats its a film and that it has to make sense on its own :D

    • @LlorracTN
      @LlorracTN 9 лет назад +80

      Callum Lerigo Exactly, they should be explained in the films too. Films shouldn't have to come with instruction manuals in the form of books to understand everything!

    • @CallumLerigo
      @CallumLerigo 9 лет назад +2

      I've read the books twice through each and have a memory like a sponge so I can reason everything I see and understand, but I know many people who'd just sit staring blankly :p

    • @16m49x3
      @16m49x3 9 лет назад +4

      Callum Lerigo you couldn't explain the arbitrary power levels of any one magician or magic spell though.
      Because a Hermione could know 500 thousand spells in one scene, and then lose a fight right after. And then suddenly get rescued from an even worse situation than what made them get caught in the first place.
      When the reason for why something in a story is arbitrary, it no longer becomes as exciting to watch. Because the past has no bearing on the future.

    • @joTheBonas
      @joTheBonas 9 лет назад +1

      Haiiry Cake when i remember correctly hermione was written pretty consistent in the books.
      If they changed that in the movie, of course he cant explain it then

  • @alw6445
    @alw6445 8 лет назад +141

    "tell me about the rabbits, George"

    • @LegoMovies1212
      @LegoMovies1212 8 лет назад

      Watched that movie like last week. Coincedence??

    • @mattnmattd
      @mattnmattd 8 лет назад

      Skull_Gaming that's a movie?????

    • @ThePirateCat78
      @ThePirateCat78 8 лет назад +5

      is that from of mice and men

  • @RafaelBergmans
    @RafaelBergmans 5 лет назад +32

    3:22 he got hit by a sectum sempra only Snape can heal those wounds

    • @ogluqqychess4452
      @ogluqqychess4452 4 года назад +1

      Its actually dark magic which is why harrys scar never healed.

    • @RafaelBergmans
      @RafaelBergmans 4 года назад +6

      @@ogluqqychess4452 it's snapes own spell the sectum sempra and he also has a healing spell for it which was comfirmed in the books but also in the movie because he healed Draco and in the books it's shown

    • @ogluqqychess4452
      @ogluqqychess4452 4 года назад +5

      @@RafaelBergmans its actually not "confirmed" in the books. He gives malfoy dittany in the book which is known to heal physical wounds, even though there would be scarring.
      George loses his ear. At this point even dittany would not be able to regrow his ear, but it would seal the flesh wound caused by it.
      What IS confirmed in the books is that dark magic leaves scars that never heal, ie harrys scar, georges ear, the dark mark.. etc

  • @topbanana6378
    @topbanana6378 6 лет назад +273

    I'm pretty sure this guy is a muggle...

    • @charliemccfc
      @charliemccfc 5 лет назад +4

      He is clueless

    • @gaytrise
      @gaytrise 5 лет назад +4

      Lol you are too buddy.

    • @kimjongun2536
      @kimjongun2536 5 лет назад

      So are you virgin

    • @sherrim8907
      @sherrim8907 5 лет назад

      Yep. Either he hasn't read any books or he's just trying to tell us how would ppl who haven't read the books understand this all as it's not explained in the movies!

    • @heckme3404
      @heckme3404 5 лет назад +2

      Sherry M the books don't matter in this series

  • @StarWarsROTJ1983
    @StarWarsROTJ1983 9 лет назад +240

    Woah woah woah CinemaSins! Hedwig is a girl.

    • @GoddoDoggo
      @GoddoDoggo 9 лет назад +25

      StarWarsROTJ1983 That is clearly a male snowy owl, not female. I don't care if she's "supposed" to be a girl, that is not a female owl.
      Males are mostly or all white (like Hedwig), females have distinct dense black and gray spots.

    • @yumi25390
      @yumi25390 9 лет назад +40

      Lynne the Trendy Tetraodontiforme He referred to the character 'Hedwig', who is, in fact, very female.

    • @nahor88
      @nahor88 9 лет назад +13

      Lynne the Trendy Tetraodontiforme
      Hedwig is female, they even say so in earlier films.

    • @blackromeoKOK
      @blackromeoKOK 9 лет назад +1

      You correct CinemaSins but spell "whoa" incorrectly, that amuses me. :-D

    • @RoxanneDsouza
      @RoxanneDsouza 9 лет назад +10

      blackromeoKOK Actually the spelling depends from person to person. "Whoa" is the American way and "woah" is he English way. I always type "woah"

  • @PatrickHolensaber
    @PatrickHolensaber 8 лет назад +46

    Apparating and disapparating are different.
    Apparating is the act of appearing at the location.
    Disapparating is the act of disappearing from the first location.
    Say you want to use magic to go from Tokyo to America.
    You'd disapparate in Tokyo and apparate in America.

    • @musaabhasan6450
      @musaabhasan6450 8 лет назад

      yeah but if you disapear then you reappear somewhere else so your comment is dumb

    • @PatrickHolensaber
      @PatrickHolensaber 8 лет назад

      Musaab Hasan What the hell is a coent?

    • @Avatarbee
      @Avatarbee 8 лет назад

      Might be that they say "Disapperate" when the location is known. But when they know where the person wanted to go they say "he/she appareted to [location].".

    • @Avatarbee
      @Avatarbee 8 лет назад

      What makes you say that?

    • @quigglepuff7576
      @quigglepuff7576 8 лет назад

      But to determine it as disapparation you'd need the context of the original apparation?

  • @blueraspberrycat1283
    @blueraspberrycat1283 5 лет назад +74

    The greatest mistake in all the sins was him calling Hedwig a he

    • @cadenmorse1024
      @cadenmorse1024 4 года назад +2

      @@Kaiser_MHA they did in deathly hallows part 1

    • @shanks6404
      @shanks6404 4 года назад +1

      Its still a hillarious video potter fanatic

    • @xcanzitex
      @xcanzitex 4 года назад

      RIGHT!!! You sir....do not reserve the right to sin things that are incorrect via movie world unless you are sinning correctly via the true story/book world. 🙃🙂🙃 Read the books and sin them...on a side note I love your channel

  • @TheNerdynigga
    @TheNerdynigga 9 лет назад +36

    If Voldemort had allowed anyone else to kill Harry he would have won. I love this series but that's just lazy villain writing. She could have actually made Harry a competent wizard but instead chose to make him completely average and go with Shitty Villain Trope #43 to give him a fighting chance. Also because of the various zones of magical protection he can flee too, going after Harry directly failed horribly but.... Why didn't Voldemort just capture all of Harry's allies one by one? Seriously, Barty Crouch Jr ambushed and subdued Moody by himself in the fourth book/movie and he's the most formidable member of the Order of the Phoenix besides Snape and Dumbledore. Take Moody and kill him then capture, interrogate and use the Imperious Curse to take control of the remaining members in order to get to Harry! Kill or capture all of his support and leave him as alone as possible. Why wasn't that the plan since book four?! Actually speaking of the fourth book/movie..... Jr infiltrated Hogwarts using polyjuice potion...... fucking polyjuice potion... he used some second year trivial bullshit and he was actually alone with Harry multiple times! Why is it so hard for someone else to get into the school and kidnap Harry even with tightened security? Seriously for most of the series Snape is portrayed as an asshole for constantly giving Harry shit about being unremarkable in every way and relying heavily on luck and far more talented friends but..... dude's not wrong! If Voldemort wasn't such a dipshit or if he had any halfway competent lieutenants at all Harry would be dead by the fourth book and he'd have little to no problem taking over the wizarding world. But no.... instead by book seven Harry takes him out like a boss and, naturally, I loved every minute of it >:D (the book not the movie).

    • @imperialfish454
      @imperialfish454 9 лет назад +1

      M. Victor Howard
      According to tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/TheBadGuysAreCops, Shitty Villain Trope #43 is known as "The Bad Guys Are Cops" which is really only fulfilled near the end of this series, and hardly at all if you ignore the books.

    • @TheNerdynigga
      @TheNerdynigga 9 лет назад

      ImperialFish I stand corrected! I guess I should reorder my badbguy tropes to match that one :)

    • @TheNerdynigga
      @TheNerdynigga 9 лет назад

      ghost First of all calm down. You're so worked up over this you don't even realize how wrong you how are right now. Nowhere, in any of the 7 books (which iIve or 8 movies does it that only Voldemort can kill Harry or that only certain people can destroy Horcruxes. Harry, as far as anyone knows, is the first human Horcrux. Nowhere did it suggest that any special person or item was necessary to destroy the piece of Voldemort's soul in Harry. In the end it was simply the Killing Curse that destroyed it. The only reason its good for Voldemort to kill Harry is because of his mother's magical protection. That's why he survived the second time. Voldemort doesn't know that, though. Of course he wanted to be the one to kill Harry. I said that myself. That was my point. It's stupid and its a bad guy trope. Villians always have some bullshit reason they let the hero live and this is one of the most common. It's actually the only reason Voldemort loses. It's pretty obvious that Harry is the only person who can threaten him (besides Dumbledore). The smart thing would be to stay as far away from Harry as possible and Voldemort is extremely intelligent. The only reason this "only I can kill him" bullshit persists is so that Harry can survive untill the end. By the way if you're getting all of your information from the movies you probably should just stay quiet. The movies are based on the books and they don't explain a lot of shit.

    • @riich73
      @riich73 9 лет назад +3

      M. Victor Howard I was under he impression that Harrys Mums spell kept him safe, but that Voldermort had got around that by taking his blood in that resurrection ritual or whatever, meaning that only he could kill him? The reason he survived the second curse, was because it killed the horcrux and not Harry, but in doing so, Harry recreated his mothers protection spell. As he 'died' for everyone, it meant that effectively Voldermorts magic stopped working properly. I think that was what Trelawneys prediction was supposed to be about?

    • @redrocketgame
      @redrocketgame 9 лет назад

      +M. Victor Howard now i know this is a little old but i thought i'd add my two cents. i always got the impression that voldemort was highly egotistical and that the reason he was so obsessed with being the one to kill harry is because harry is what caused his fall from power in the first place, it was his one mistake and now he's obsessed with fixing it. probably still a trope but eh that's what i'd always gotten the impression of.

  • @lex1086
    @lex1086 5 лет назад +172

    literally almost every one of these sins would have been solved if they showed ANYTHING important from the books

  • @AethanThorson
    @AethanThorson 9 лет назад +457

    If I apparently have to read a book to understand your movie. Then you made your movie poorly.

    • @MilenaHdez
      @MilenaHdez 9 лет назад +26

      Aethan Thorson absolutely, as a HP fan I hate the movies, they are a disgrace to the source material. Unless you read the books you'll end up with twice as many sins and/or questions.

    • @shift7808
      @shift7808 9 лет назад +19

      Milena Hdez The source material is a disgrace to the source material lol.
      The books go more in depth than the films do (I've read them all), but the majority of things related to magic go completely unexplained.

    • @SpartacusRyuuou
      @SpartacusRyuuou 9 лет назад +26

      Shift doesn't help that rowling was making stuff up as she went along, stuff that throws every book before it into question.

    • @tylerluvskayli9580
      @tylerluvskayli9580 9 лет назад

      SpartacusRyuuou Like what? Lol.

    • @SpartacusRyuuou
      @SpartacusRyuuou 9 лет назад +13

      floo travel in book two that puts Dumbledore flying for Hogwarts to the Ministry in question, as well as portkeys in book 4. in book 3 and 4 it is implied that Harry is at least above average in power, but suddenly becomes mediocre by book 6, where he has no idea how to use fire spells against the inferi. in book 6, amortentia is heavily referencec, bringing to mind that part in book 3 that mentions Molly 'catching Arthurs attention' with a love potion, and throughout book 6, the same one where love potions do very bad things to people, Harry and Hermione's characters are utterly different from what they were in book 5. i never read book 7, so i only have bits and pieces to go on.

  • @meteor7528
    @meteor7528 5 лет назад +10

    Sin 45: Actually no, it was first featured in the second book/movie when Gilderoy tried to erase Ron and Harry's memory and ended up erasing his own