Everything Wrong With Harry Potter & The Deathly Hallows Part 1
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 фев 2025
- You've waited long enough. Finally... we bring you the sins of the final Harry Potter movie. Well... Part 1, at least.
Free snacks!! naturebox.com/c...
Jeremy's book is out everywhere: theablesbook.com
Thursday: More sins!
Remember, no movie is without sin. Which movie's sins do YOU want to see recounted?
Tweet us: / cinemasins
Tumble us: / cinema-sins
Call us: 405-459-7466
Reddit with us: / cinemasins Merch: teespring.com/... Кино
half these things are explained in the book
i'm not mad at him, i'm mad at the movie for doing a shit job at explaining things
@Adwaith To be fair there's a lot of stuff they could have cut and info that they every easily could have slipped in to a number of conversations.
Explain usage of magic with and without words because honestly ive always wondered about that.
@@bestintheworld7090 Wands are magical instruments that help wizards channel their powers for better results. Wandless magic is possible but requires greater skills.
@@danielaf3092 what about saying the spells out loud vs somehow doing the same spells without saying anything?
@@bestintheworld7090 Like wandless magic, non verbal spells are harder to perform. They are crucial in duels, so your opponents have a harder time defending themselves.
I'm so mad because about 80% of these sins are sins simply because the movies cut out everything that explained what was going on. I'm not saying it's your guys' fault, it's not, it's the movie's for not properly explaining.
Vash Zwingli my sentiments exactly...the movies cut out too much stuff, they should CinemaSins shoudl read the books then re-evaluate this
Jeffrey Hongo But in the case of CinemaSins, "The Books Do Not F*cking Matter"
Jeffrey Hongo Nah CinemaSins base it off purely whats in the movie- any other media is irrelevent.
Jeffrey Hongo you must be new to this channel
Vash Zwingli that's what I was saying lol I still found a lot of humor in the video, but the book, like you said, explains 80% of what he said
One of the biggest sins of the movie series is they never explain why people were afriad of speaking Voldemort's name. In the past, once Voldemort became strong and influential enough within the Ministry, a sort of trace was put on the name, so that you could be located if you ever spoke it, Death Eaters would apparate near you because speaking the name would be seen as an act of defiance. By Deathly Hallows, the 'trace' is back online.
In this movie, people who speak the name are located twice this way, in the Coffee shop and in Lovegood's house, but IT'S NEVER EXPLAINED. And I'm pretty sure Harry HIMSELF in this movie(Part 1 & 2) switches from his usual calling of Voldemort by his name to You-Know-Who, but it is never EXPLAINED in the movies.
It's such a wasted opportunity. Throughout the entire movie series, from the very first one, wizards are terrified of speaking his name, and when they finally get the chance to explain the main reason WHY, they just ignore it. Smh.
I think Ron does explain it but its a very very passing comment right when he comes back if I'm not mistaken...
@@am7737 that was in a deleted scene
Reshma Mohan when you said voldermort, death eaters would know your location so they would instead say “youknowwho”
The movies didn't explain it, they showed it instead, which to be fair is what a movie should do!
I mean, it’s pretty heavily implied when the death-eaters arrive at Luna Lovegood’s house, since right when he says Voldemort they appear
0:57
"You make it sound like the wand is actually part of the owner's physical being, and that twin wands know not to kill each other, which can't be true."
...But that's exactly what happened.
Random Gaming it’s explained when they talk specifically about this- the book was broken into two movies and that part of the book ended up in part 2 of the film.
Plus Wandless Magic.
@Random Gaming They literally explain in the first movie that wands choose the wizard or witch. This entire two part movie is reliant on a wand that doesn't obey to Voldemort. Just because the movie doesn't spell it out for you doesn't mean they don't explain it.
@Random Gaming But Voldemort does explain it. He says it in the clip for the sin. That is then reinforced by moments both before and later in the series.
@Random Gaming That's fine. I don't agree with some things the movie did either but the wand thing never bothered me.
sin 147
they can't say Voldemort's name because there's a taboo on it. if you say his name, death eaters will be able to track you. and that's how they found them in the coffee shop
Right, there's a trace on his name.
Despite the fact that Harry says Voldemort MULTIPLE times as a child, and yet Hogwarts was never assaulted by Death Eaters. Harry's biggest threats have always been either a single double agent, or a plan that's so thin and fragile requiring so many separate circumstances to go right that they could be thwarted by simply disagreeing to do it. And one year (Prisoner) Voldemort wasn't a concern AT ALL, the focus was entirely on Sirius who was only perceived as a Death Eater. Seems this taboo/hex is faulty. Or plot convenient.
*ding*
Thor Odinson - Oooh, so it was only once Voldy had genuinely returned as the dark lord that the curse came back
YeahNahHowYaGoin it was only after Voldemort and his followers took over the ministry of magic that they put the taboo on the name
Yeah, that's what I was gonna say.
I think Molly Weasley was doing the dished because she needed to take her mind off the danger by doing manual labor.
yes the people should have read the books you get a better takes on everything like most of the sins are explain like voldmort's name the wands Molly with the stress and paranoia with her clock and needs to be busy
yes the people should have read the books you get a better takes on everything like most of the sins are explain like voldmort's name the wands Molly with the stress and paranoia with her clock and needs to be busy
HypnoTheWolf oh i agree i just wanted to put this out-there for the rest who don't know
"Housewife does housework to take her mind off something dangerous" sin. DING!
Matt Shea you hear that? that's the sound of every father/brother/son in the world wanting you to get hit by a bus caveman
Why transform everybody into Harry and risk their lives instead of making Harry look like someone else?
Good point.
That was dumbledores idea in the books too lol
Kátrox I mean, if they know Harry is at his house, but when everyone leaves he isn't there. Then he would still have to be with them. Even if they didn't theorize this they would try to get the information out of the people fleeing his house, at least this way it brings some confusion
Kátrox or how about use muggle transport/ walk for idk, say, 40% of the trip, or disguise the brooms as a car, then fly low, or enchant a semi truck then- oh wait actually the semi truck idea is abysmal
Why would there be a large group of people who obviously and openly oppose Voldemort just randomly be flying around on brooms and Thestrals in the sky near the place where Harry lives? Not suspicious at all, right?
Ron’s unwarranted jealousy is because he is carrying the horcrux, and as a result is absorbing dark/negative energy.
yep, and anyone who READ THE BOOKS WOULD KNOW THIS SHIT
ripexe
Yeah but this is the movie, and it didn’t explain it there as far as I remember. The name of the creator of this video is CINEMA sins, not BOOK sins.
@@PrimDidEverythingWrong they literally explain it when Hermione first tells Harry to give her the locket.
Harry is a horcrux ofc. Soo...
@@lunari2939 I didn't read the books and even I knew this. They kind of hinted that in the movie lol Hermione even mentioned it at least twice.
Instead of calling him "you know who" they should have given him a demeaning code name, like "dickwad" or "douchetard" or something like that cause it would be easier
how about dipshit?
noseless.
+not your damn business lmao
He who cannot be nosed.
MrGayNerdNoNoseMan
"handed to them on a Harry Platter so they can advance the Harry Plotter"
i laughed waaaay longer than i should have
You mean... way longbottomer?
Oh, cool! I've never seen a real tumbleweed before!
It killed me too. XD
"Midnight, mom always said midnight" Molly Weasley hates twilight, that's why she killed Bella
You are a genius my friend omg
That's a meme
kendall Stalder lol! !
Thats from Cinema Wins
Hes english. So its MUM.
"What's the spell? Is it a stupify spell? A kill spell? A speak and spell?"
- Cinemasins, 2015
I think they say that spell in mind
Like they never speak expeliamus loudly
They say it in mind
Sin 47: literally it says that that day was his birthday like 2 seconds after you cut the clip
Ah sorry. He should have awarded 2 sins for convenience. Like pretty much everything in these movies.
@@marmitaa8619How is that convenience? It's just like saying "Oh, my piano lessons are today, which are sessions where I practice piano, and today I got a new piano. What a coincidence!"
@@ludwiggalaxy4277 I don't think you know what the definition of convenience is.
Was gonna like but it was on 69. Sorry not sorry
@@oliveroswald177 What?
I read through most of the comments and cant believe somebody didnt mention that at 4:20 he says that the Deluminator should be called the illuminator, it literally takes the light out of things, it "de-lights" them. Jeez Dumbledore even did it in the first movie. Cmon man...
It bothered me too!
its almost like he just nit picks and doesnt actually watch the movies what a shocker
Devin Mann its same with every fact like the house burnt down so they dont have the magic servant things
6:30 Harry's dead uncle.... righto then
lol 4:20
On a Harry Platter to advance the Harry Plotter..... oh god I laughed so hard
0:11 the reason because the Wesley’s have a House because in the book it never was burned down
But it was in the movies, so that's the reality that should be being followed in...ya know, the movies.
@@instantstupor yeah but he explained himself, they probably fixed it with magic or some shit
@Godel Escher Bach Well, since they don't live in California, they can afford it.
Real estate must be so cheap in England. Imagine the property tax on a house like that in the US.
Well the solution is easy, like... magic?
They can repair shit with magic, never understood why they made that scene so dramatic like: Anyway wish woosh homeless finitate
I'm sorry, i know this is all in good fun and all but.... did you just sin Doby's Funeral...?
Did you just misspell Dobby? ;P
@@andybagles4156 shit....
@@HiddenValar and have you still haven't editted it?
@@Nish-ej3zn mistakes are the only way we learn, young one.
AbyssKnifes I’ve read the books and I honestly felt nothing for Dobby’s Funeral.
"serve it up on a Harry Platter to advance the Harry Plotter" as far as puns go, this is the best one
HDwalrus ikr 😂😂😂😂
Maybe Hermione was wearing perfume because she hadn't showered since at least Grimmauld place and had been staying in a tent with 2 teenage boys for at least a week
no, because she was at a wedding
Perfume is designed to make them less horny?
@@jms2a30 the parfume still stay? What kind of parfume is that
@@joannak3821 it's called body smell
So... Don't they have an infinite supply of water, because a refilling spell exists? Why wouldn't they shower, using the spells Hermoine used to turn their camp invisible as curtain?
"Dobby only meant to maim or, seriously injure"
Too bad this is probably the funniest line in the entire franchise. Not a lot of humor in these movies, but when there is it's executed very well.
Yeah honestly. The books at least were amusing
I'm sorry there wasn't a lot of laughs in literal nazi wizard englandy for you
What about when Fred and George turn into Harry with poly juice potion and say “Wow! We’re identical!”
What about any scene with Fred and George besides Fred’s death
@@evatheunderrated3734 you're right, i totally forgot about "i'm all ears"!
5:35 I get the sinning here, but the Obliviate spell was used in Chamber of Secrets when Lockhart was going to wipe Harry and Ron's memories.
Finallyy I knew someone must have noticed
I rewatched this video after a few months and saw this sin. I came to the comments looking for this and you, good sir, made me happy.
Why was lockhart
@@Dingooose Harry and Ron found out Lockhart was a fraud and they forced him down into the chamber of secrets and Ron asked "is there anything you can do?" And Lockhart was skilled in memory charms so he was going to obliviate Ron and Harry and say they went insane when they saw Ginnys mangled body but Lockhart used Ron wand which was broken earlier so the obliviate charm bounced off and instead of hitting Ron it hit Lockhart himself and now Lockhart is in a wizard hospice place for people who's spells went wrong
@@bleachandtidepodsbye887 no I meant like why was Lockhart a thing? what was his purpose? Why did he get as much screentime as he did if the only thing he ultimately accomplishes is getting ron stuck with him in the chamber so harry can have his moment and defeat the big bad snake himself.
Apparate and Disapparate both refer to the same act, but the proper usage depends on whether you are departing or arriving. You arrive by apparating at a location, while you depart by disapparating.
Anyone should know that just by comparing them to the words "appear" and "disappear", lol.
Same principle as the difference between emigrating and immigrating.
Ryan Gerhard but technically by apparating you are doing both at the same time
FurReal Gaming In the books it is explained that apparating is not an instantaneous transportation, but it takes a couple seconds. So you disapparate from a place, and apparate at another place a few seconds later.
Ryan Gerhard NEEERRRDDDD ALERT! NEEERRRDDDD ALERT! Jk I am a nerd too
About sin 13: Hagrid is actually less likely to be taking Harry, because, well, he can barely use magic. The movie doesn't explain this, but it's pretty logical that Voldemort might consider that the real Harry would be protected by powerful aurors/wizards (Moody, Kingsley, Tonks, Lupin, etc.), and not... well, Hagrid. That's actually what Moody thought as well, and that's why the real Harry went it Hagrid.
That's why Voldemort went straight after Moody (and killing him), allowing the real Harry to escape with Hagrid until Hedwig showed up (or Harry used Expelliarmus in the books)
I never really thought about that but now that makes perfect sense
And this is why Moldy is an idiot. He got outfoxed by a man known to be super paranoid and a group of teens, when we're told he was basically an evil Hermione back in school, but with charisma. Seriously, did all of his intelligence get cut in half every time he made a horcrux? Probably. Would explain his stupidity throughout the whole series.
It also essentially worked as Voldemort went right for Moony. Mundungus and Hedwig screwed it up a bit but it still saved Harry from trying to deal with the entire journey being tailed by Volde who would have wrecked him and anyone he was with.
He can use magic as much as a normal wizard. But he just doesn't know as much spells. Cause he got expelled by year 2
Tonks wasn't likely you can't compare Tonks to Alastor or Kingsley.
The Death Eaters knew they were there because Hermione said "Voldemort"
Voldemort was able to track people down who spoke that name.
You may noticed that right after Hermione said Voldemort, the Death Eaters came walking in a few seconds later.
This also when they where at Lovegood's, when he said "Voldemort" they immediately came flying to them.
Again, books mentioned that, not the movies. He doesn't care about the Books. You shouldn't have to read the books to understand something. Movie should explain it.
DeadlyPandaArmy but the thing is if you pay attention to what they say. You can pick that up on your own with self awareness. Never read the books but i love all the movies
Marteh, thank you for picking up in this stuff he obviously isnt, I think he just likes to sin randomly
@@TheSagesSon How would you pick someone that's not explained anywhere, is not obvius, and is inconsistent with the rest of movies?
@@AlbertoDsign the first scene where the death waters cane in was left to be seen as chance but all should be understood when live good called them to his house by saying his name
The Emperor: ruled the Galaxy for like 20 years
Soron: almost took over the world twice
Voldemort: tried to take over a magic school, and failed
Well, Voldemort did take over the British Ministry of Magic, and Hogwarts was a hub of the resistance/rebels at that moment in time. And still, Voldemort only lost because of some stupid technicality.
Voldemort had taken over the world before he tried to kill Harry. I am saying world because he terrorized muggles and wizards alike. You do realize Voldemort is like in his 60s? He has been around for quite some time. He was gone for barely 14 years and when he returns we get a glimpse of how bad things were in the last 2 books. It's like Hitler in Nazi Germany and there are literal witch hunts going on. People are tortured and killed for no good reason except for the fact that they are 'Mudbloods' or 'Mudblood sympathizers' (Charity Burbage).
Had to google who Soron is
Mr. Pinecone I
Mr. Pinecone Sauron..... But yes lol. Good point
And this is why the books are superior. Most of the sins with the movie are well explained in the books. The movies just let shit happen assuming everyone read the books
Also most of the sins are explained if you actually watch the movies as well and read the books. If you do both, then 99.9% of the sins are explained.
My Back Tickles I Think Im a Super Saiyan yeah but you have to say that the battle for Hogwarts is way better in the movie
Have you read the books? And why come to a comment like this just to hate on HP? Its not full of plot holes. Sure, its convenient at times, but convenience is not the same as plot holes. List 5, heck, even 1 technical plot hole in the books (because the movies are inaccurate).
_ _
J
^ L(O-OL)
My Back Tickles I Think Im a Super Saiyan THANK YOU
They say that "Oblivate" is invented for this movie yet it was used by Lockhart in book 2 and I'm sure the movie aswell though he may not have spoken the incantation.
Yeah exactly, so it's always been part of the story.
Mr Zombly Nope, he used Amnesia
Creamshaker Not sure if extremely bad joke or plain stupidity...
Mr Zombly You're correct, he says it aloud while in the chamber of secrets (in the movie and the book)
Thanks melons1994, so -1 sin? xD
2:45 I thought this was clever. She's cleaning her own pots and pans despite not having to because she's experiencing anxiety and trying to distract herself by actually doing something
You know those motorcycles that wake you up going down your street, but you never look at them? Totally. Hagrid explained.
OH MY GOD IT ALL MAKES SENSE
Yep.
+Rogue Sierra I read this and thought about every time I've heard a motorcycle drive by my house and realized that I have NEVER looked to see who or what it was. :o That is SO weird!
+Carina Ellefson I'll look every time from now on and have my phone ready to send you guys a picture.
Damn neighbors were wizards this whole time...
Lol we are going to prove that wizards are real!
Handed to them on a Harryplatter so they can advance the Harryplotter!😂
Hermione: "I am doing everything I ca..."
Harry: "YOU'RE NOT DOING ENOUGH!"
Hermione: "Harry, eat Snickers?"
Harry: "Why?"
Hermione: "You aren't you when your hungry."
(Harry eats Snickers)
Hermione: "Better?"
Harry: "Loads..."
Some Kruddy Krabcake oh dear
LUPIN WAS RIGHT CHOCOLATE DOES HELP !!!!!
Lupin was right about chocolate..
This made my day lol I fits so well
Add: Deleted Scene includes
Hermione: "I am doing everything I ca..."
Harry: "YOU'RE NOT DOING ENOUGH!"
Hermione: "Harry, eat Snickers?"
Harry: "Why?"
Hermione: "You aren't you when your hungry."
(Harry eats Snickers)
Hermione: "Better?"
Harry: "Loads..."
12:14 Did you miss the scene before this one where Ron says there's a taboo on Voldemort's name? That's how they were found in the cafe.
Ariel Warfare it’s a deleted scene
Harry and Hermione didn't know that
@@whatever8241 Of course 2 films almost over 2 hours long needs to delete scenes in a near 700 page book
Had they learned nothing from Order Of Phoinex about cutting out stuff
there was also a trace on Voldemort's name, but that was never mentioned in the films.
@@NagatoUzu that's... The taboo.....
Everything Wrong With Everything Wrong With Harry Potter & The Deathly Hallows Part 1:
2:16 - Not even a Sin for Hedwig's death?
11:28 - On the subject of Chamber of Secrets "...couldn't he have at least left a riddle" WAHAY
12:00 - Illuminati unconfirmed
12:19 - And our sponsor for the day is...
12:28 - Illuminati STILL unconfirmed
15:03 - Illum.... you know what? Fuck it.
18:33 - No sympathy for Dobby.
0:00 - 21:08 - Not enough Hermione
Sin Count:8
Conclusion: I should find better things to do with my time.
I agree. Needs more Hermione.
***** ?
***** ah okay got it :)
tzeiggi, nice pistola pic :)
ShenaniGaming Don't forget about the scenes that do not contain a lapdance
Hermonie is definitely old enough to be hot in this movie.
Minus 169 sins!
remove the 1
andrew Afton the hedgehog is funtime golden sonic no the 168
andrew Afton the hedgehog is funtime golden sonic did you delete the other reply? And yes I noticed that I was saying remove 168 so there was one and that one is then credits
@@IPeakedAt15 no i didnt delete the reply
andrew Afton the hedgehog is funtime golden sonic it’s not there anymore
They can't say Voldemort in this movie because the Voldemort-controlled ministry put a "taboo" spell on the word so that anyone who says it (who is probably going to be part of the resistance) can be immediately tracked down. Problem is, they don't mention the taboo at all in the movie, so I don't know why they went halfway on this detail.
+Benjamin Rome Clarke but they not havent been saying his name before voldermort and his goons took over the ministry
Shanee Bahera Yeah, they did: Harry and Hermione have always said it because they weren't raised to fear it, and Dumbledore's Army and the Order of the Phoenix said it out of defiance. That's what makes it such a perfect word to put the taboo spell on.
Unfortunately, the film DID include the "Voldemort's name is Taboo" scene... it just got edited out during post. If you go into the DVD's deleted scenes or watch the full thing on Freeform, the scene is there. Just another scene that they should never have cut. That happens a lot in this series.
saturn0205 Huh, I didn't know that. Makes sense why they kept it in then.
They did, but deleted it, unfortunately
85: it’s pretty well established that NON verbal spell are a thing in the books
Half blood prince, boom
trey
Yeah, but this isn’t the book. It’s the movies.
Plus Wandless Magic
But why do they say there spells if they can choose not too? Whats the point?
You know what we say about books round here
Again...I have NO IDEA why it's so difficult to grasp that some spells (provided a significant level of skill) don't actually require saying the incantation. I didn't even have to read the books to know that.
Well, it's never explained, and that still doesn't make any sense. How does the wand know what to do if you don't say anything?
Dilip Tien read the sixth book
+Dilip Tien It's called non-verbal magic. A wizard's thoughts can produce magic effectively through wands as much as speaking them.
+Nonya Buissness It *IS* explained in "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince" movie, you idiot. At least watch the fucking movies before you criticize one of the movies in the series.
+Nonya Buissness I wasn't commenting on an illiterate, I was commenting on you, who made no indication of speaking on behalf of the illiterate, like some hobo Lorax. I'm not "butthurt", I find it incredibly irritating when someone asks a question, is provided the answer and the source, then continues to complain despite the fact that someone else took the time to answer what a simple Google search could have provided.
Molly hates Twilight, that's why she killed Bella.
Laura lololololololollloolloolololol
She would've killed Cedric too, I guess..
Your Cute Savage
Warner Bros:Yeah but...
Me:SILENCE Molly should have killed Bella and Cedric
Kylo455 Plays lol
who dosent hate twilight
I want to point out that obliviate was actually used in the second movie. I mean its not like Gilderoy Lockhart screamed it or anything...
\
yeah but he doesnt remember
15:28 “Ron betrays the Harry Potter series by saying,”Twilight is better.” I bet he’s even on team Jacob,the bastard.” I’m wheezing 😂😂🤣🤣
They started calling him You-Know-Who because the ministry started tracking people whenever they say it, I'm pretty sure.
Yes, a spell was attached to Voldemort's name. Anyone who said it would be located immediately.
Lorraine Hackett in part two of this video he sins it again for the same reason.
Jojo_is_a_GO That's the only one I haven't seen.
Seems to me they should have also tracked anyone saying 'You-Know-Who' as well then. How the hell would that kind of tracking work anyway?
Smeg Me a Kipper they only did it for the name Voldemort because only people who were bravest and most likely to rival against him would dare say the name
Obliviate was used in the Chamber of secrets by Lockhart; this isn't the first time.
i just realized that the deathly hallows take place in the years 1997 & 1998 but in the movies when they apperate it clearly shows 2010 london with all the screens and modern technology !! THEY GOT THE TIMEFRAME WRONG
No, it doesn't.
Lord Tullus 9 what doesnt?
Shama AlAli The books don't take place in 1998
Lord Tullus 9 i googled it and it says that j.k said that but might be wrong. i was just wondering when did it take place?
Lord Tullus 9 But... they do. Harry was born in 1980, which means the movies take place in the '90s.
I love that almost all of these are answered in the books 😂😂😂
Bek Grace yeah the movies suck
Thor Odinson compared to the books
@@egyptian_noob They should have made this a tv series. After book 3, the books just get too deep.
Exactly what I was thinking lol
Sadly many have only watched the films 😱
I understand a lot of these sins, since Harry Potter is usually the king of plot convenience.
But for a lot of these, it just seems like you weren't paying attention.
He usually doesn't
Well, at first I thought you're right. And reading and knowing the books, you ARE right. Some (not all) of the sins can actually be explained by reading and understanding the books, e. g. Hermione using Obliviate to her parents (they don't just stay in their house like in the movie, they actually thought they are different people living in Australia).
But this is only about MOVIE sins. And the movies explain shit if you ask me. Most of those sins seem a little wrong as a Harry Potter fan but if you've never read the books, you wouldn't know all those stuff. So, it's movie sins, not book sins.
did you even read the latter part of the comment?
Yeah just like the obliviate was mentioned in chamber of secrets
something that bugged me is that the only reason why harry and Hermione couldn't say Voldemort's name is because the death eaters or Voldemort himself cursed it so anyone who said his name could be tracked down immediately. I just wanted to say that
"he could have left a riddle" a TOOOOOOOOOOOOMMM riddle
But that’s just a theory. A GAME THEORY!
Sorry, but this video is sinful as fuck. A lot of the things you complain about are either based on assumptions, wildly inaccurate, or about things that are explained later on.
Syrange13 Hi. Welcome to Cinema Sins. Enjoy your stay.
This movie is wildly inaccurate plus cinemasins is all about exaggerating minor things so stop whining
Syrange13 I agree some of the sins are stupid and only based on what he likes or not, or just to make a gag.
But really most of the things he mention are big issues with the movie
It's still a pretty good video all-in-all, even though I liked this movie (I'm still a HP fan at heart, and compared to what they did to 6, this one is quite presentable.). The main one I have a problem with is the holo-deer and sword thing. You'd have to be extremely stupid to assume that those were just randomly there and won't be explained.
Syrange13 Wow, really? You clearly don'y understand this channel.
5:35 But in the Chamber Of Secrets Lockhart used it on himself, thanks to Ron's damaged wand
Everybody stop complaining that the book explains all the sins away. A good movie should be able to stand on its own.
If they would want to explain everything, the film would have a much longer duration
+Martin Schneider I'd rather have a good long movie than a short bad one.
KamektheMagikoopa1 how lord of the rings also had plotholes and its 4 hours
Agreed!
Agreed. It even says the books don't matter!!!!!
Was I the only one who figured out that R.A.B. was Sirius's brother while I was reading HBP? If someone took your liver, you'd be dead. Can't live without them. Could lose a kidney though. Hermione wore perfume to the wedding. They weren't planning on leaving til the next day. Hermione grabbed their bags just in case they had to run.
I figured it out after watching HBP the movie (I read the book before)
Why cant there be a spell to remove ur perfume smell ? Or to keep you warm ? Literally almost all of their inconveniences can be fixed by just making up spells or using spells that theyve already used previously. Thats the problem with universes like these , if the author can make up spells according to plot convenience, why can't I ?
I figured out who The Half Blood Prince was whilst reading the book. The handwriting and were the potions book was were big giveaways.
lol I figured it out too
@@Onmysheet Not the Half Blood Prince. I was talking about R.A.B., the guy who tried to destroy the locket. It was Sirius's brother. Regulus Arcturus Black. (I probably misspelled it, but oh well.) After I read the sixth book I went back to the fifth and reread Harry and Sirius's conversation, then knew who that was.
C'mon, ya gotta give Rowling some credit; she made a character that everyone could not like at all: Dolores Umbridge.
I don't even care if she was some crazy cat lady or whatever; hated her more than Voldemort.
Watch Malificent. The actor for umbridge cares for a child!!!
🌟Have a magical day!✨See you at Hogwarts!🔮
Tanvi Deshpande What?!
Soham Mukherjee I liked her! I was almost rooting for her xD
We all go a little mad sometimes
-U DAI-
Did you just call Hedwig a he?
The book protray Hedwig as female. But, in the movie, they have to use male Owl. Because it's prettier.
That's what I heard.
obviously Hedwig is a hoo
Hedwig is a SHE
Hassan Kamel grade A reply
@@InnocentC0 they pronounce hedwig "she" in the movie to . Harry says in chamber of secrets to uncle Vernon " but she is bored, if I could take her out, for an hour"
8:21 Hermione literally used that spell 'Finite Incantatem' in Chamber of Secrets to destroy the rogue bludger in Harry's quidditch match; How does Yaxley not know it?
Its probably not that he doesnt, more that he is lazy or doesnt have time. I assume you dont have to clean your own office eventhough you know how to use a vacuum...
Previous video: Sinned for using magic without a wand
This video: Sinned for NOT using magic without a wand.
Exactly the kind of inconsistency due to which both of them are sinned
He sinned not using it because it has now been presented as an option.
And?
What?
Aaron Bradley god damn dude, there is something seriously wrong with you !
CinemaSins continuously refers to Hedwig as a male when she is in fact female, which there is no justification for since in several movies and right after the mystery question for idenfication sin in this movie Harry says "She was trying to protect me." *Ding*
Sensei Skyrim huh. Well there’s a sin we can give without going all potterhead
How dare you, you know I don't know what half of those words mean
El Padre con Verga Larga Hedwig has always been a female owl.
Even in the second movie Harry calls Hedwig a he, when he's trying to explain to his uncle that he (hedwig's) bored and needs to be let out his cage.
Yet the owl that played Hedwig in the movies was male.
This is how many times I yelled "IF YOU READ THE BOOKS!!!"😂
⬇
"Books don't fucking matter"
Cinemasin - Everything wrong with Cinemasin.
This movie is very close too the books. the last two books were bad. seriously bad. The books should be sinned
Half of his sin would be taken off if he read the books but it is called Cinema sins
@@12shecat2 it's still a sin if the movie doesn't explain it
Everyone complaining "if you read the books!!!" When the channel is "cinema sins" not "book sins"
I'm pretty sure Obliviate was gunna be used in the chamber of secrets by Lockheart to make everyone forget what a bitch he was but because he used Rons' broken want it backfired. Not 100% sure on this...
fred9136 It was. It is also used by the Departmant for Magical Catastrophes (or however its called) to oblivate muggles who ahve seen magic.
fred9136 That was Amnesia
***** It falls under oblivation speels too. It's just not as selective.
fred9136 Yes it is what happens. Seriously, the amount of people that are too lazy to read the book that covers almost all the plot holes the movies show is astronomical lol
fred9136 Read the books :-)
I know they say the books don't matter, but the movie was made so bad, the book explains almost 99% of all the shit they brought up.
Epags Gamer That's the point. If the movies can't be understood without the books, it's still sin-able.
***** Yea I know that, that is what I am saying, the movie is a horrible interpretation of the book
Epags Gamer i dare you to try and make a movie that explains as much as book like harry potter, and game of thrones into about an hour- two hours for each book without it being bored
freezinfeet Few key points they shouldn't explain. Trace ends at age 17, harry can't cast spells until that. Wealsy house had protection, the minister could get in bc he was the fucking minister. Spells can be cast without or with speaking. and the whole wand thing, this all could have been done in five minutes
Epags Gamer Yes, but given the butchering of such important material in the previous movies... Deathly Hallows 1 & 2... in my opinion are the closest the movies have come to their book since the first movie.
Voldermort didn't get caught in the power lines. There were enchantments that stopped him going further and his burst of outrage destroyed the power lines.
Also, couldn't Harry have used incendio to melt the ice pool and warm the water. And they should just put the horcrux in Hermione's bag! Then Harry would have gotten the sword so easily!
I'm fairly that incendio created fire, so it would have been quite useless. I do recall there being a spell that made heat radiate from your wand mentioned in the third book, and underwater the Incendio caused jets of boiling water to come off your wand. It would have been too hot if Harry had casted it on himself and too small amount to warm up the whole pond, though
Arion Varfis-van Warmelo well that's what we're supposed to guess happened after your action seen is nothing but a gargled mess of noise and lights
Arion Varfis-van Warmelo there's a spell mentioned in one of the books that creates a jet of hot air
Lucius' wand backfires on Voldemort and he gets pissed off and destroys stuff around him. No need to even know about the protective spells around their house mentioned in books. CinemaSins didn't pay enough attention watching this film.
I remember seeing the poster for part 2 of hogwarts burning in the theater and I casually said this out loud enough in front of my sister who is a Harry Potter fan.
“Who set the Disney castle on fire?”
The look of pure disgust she gave me still makes me bust out laughing to this day. I was young so I didn’t know better. XD
The reason Harry and the others don't say Voldemort is because you could get tracked by Voldemort and his death eaters.
Yeah but the movie doesn't explain that because it doesn't exist in the movie, only in the book, and the books don't matter.
Secret Guy there was a deleted scene for this. Don't know why they decided to delete it
@Dragon meta Knight654 "Books don't matter", the perfect description of our current paradigm.
Also, they could've called Voldy by his real name, Tom.
DISapparating is the disappearing part and apparting is the appearing part. Pretty obvius.
I think of it like emigration and immigration
Well it’s not obvious for people who don’t speak English as a first language.
That’s true, but...when u Disapparate u then apparate into the next place, so.....I guess they r sorta the same thing, soo...idk
LoLouv Torres
That’s not even an English word.
I took it to mean if you 'apparate' you transport yourself to a place intentionally. Disapparate is disappearing from where you are. Essentially the same operation just emphasis on why it is done and whether arrival or departure is more important.
3:29 he says "JUST apparated" the mumbling in these movies should totally get like 11 sins though. Also, they call him "you know who" in this one because if you speak his name it brings the death eaters straight to you.
not mentioned in the movie
That's literally what happens when they say his name in the diner and the death eaters come and fight them
Stephsaguudefan yeah but that wasnt mentioned in the films
Bsgrjsbr Sqdbarj it is ? several times it even happened like when lunas father says his name?
Yellow House yes i know but they never explicitly mentioned why that happened. I guarantee like 90% of non-book readers who watched this movie will have know idea why the death eaters showed up in that scene.
Pretty crazy how this series went from so childlike and happy to Ron nearly bleeding to death
died XD
Harry: "Hermione, his arm!"
You: "WHAT DO YOU THINK SHE'S ASKING YOU TO GET THE MEDICINE FOR?"
*ding*
Literally me watching that scene lol
14:23
"I'm going to have Ron Weasley's babies" face.
not so different from her "I'm about to cry" face, her "I'm going to skin Ron alive" face, or her "I'm so disappointed in you" face.
which is creepy
Spencer Cox I think you confused Emma Watson and Kristen Stewart.
J Meee One overacts, one underacts. They're two sides of the same shitty coin
The Deatheaters found the trio in the cafe because Harry said Voldemort's name. That is also the reason why they're found later on in the movie but some Deatheaters and brought to Malfoy Manor. There is a taboo on the name Voldemort, so that whenever someone says his name, Deatheaters can find these people
bonjourmarlene Where, in the movies, was this mentioned at any time? Could have easily been added when Ron came back, but there was nothing at all said about it.
hogfather22 I know, unfortunately. It IS a movie sin, but I wanted to say it for people who'd only seen the movies & not read the books.
hogfather22 Hermione mentions it one time in part 1
+tjv323 Really? Which part?
Turned it on to find the spot. I was a bit wrong, it was Ron who said it. About half-way through Deathly Hallows Pt.1. Just after the trio use polyjuice potion in the ministry and are in their tent.
18:33 Actually, JK Rowling is responsible for putting Dobby in that situation.
Am I the only one who thought Bellatrix was kinda hot? You know in that bat shit crazy kinda way
Nope your not the only one 😔🔫
+Stein Even Malfoy in real life does
***** What are you talkin about... ?
+Theo Roosevelt He means the Harley Quinn kinda hot
i feel you
I love how several of these issues are explained in the books, but of course the movies didn't put them in to "save time." Which totally explains Deathly Hallows being two parts...
Astro Raven THE BOOKS DO NOT FUCKING MATTER, go check everything wrong with cinema sins jesus
MexicanOnGames I did...I was pointing out how it seemed funny. Don't make assumptions, cuz guess what, you were wrong.
MexicanOnGames I wasn't complaining, merely pointing out something I thought funny. *Learn to fucking see humor, Jesus*
at number 42: They knew Harry, Ron, and Hermione were in the coffeeshop because Harry said Voldermort's name.
But they dont explain the taboo
@@festus9749 The do, just not until the scene with Mr. Lovegood.
''I`m going to have Ron Weasley`s babies`` face.
I just died XDDDDDDD
Sirius was his godfather not his uncle
Whatever
Close enough.
@@happybureaucrat1311 No
Well, in all fairness they did say in the books that all pureblood wizard families are related in one way or another, so Harry and Sirius likely do have some kind of biological connection through James.
@@PittsburghSportsFan43 No
THE WAND CHOOSES THE WIZARD!
YESYEAYEA
🌟Have a magical day!✨See you at Hogwarts!🔮
cinema sins is op
Pranav Eswaran THAT BULLSHIT DOESNT EXPLAIN WAND STDS
...
🌟Have a magical day!✨See you at Hogwarts!🔮
Pranav Eswaran Yeah, but don't forget that Harry can still use Hermione's wand or whatever. But 2 things: 1, to use somebody else's wand they either have to give it up willingly or defeat them in a duel/battle, and 2, you can never use somebody else's wand as well as your own because only one wand is a perfect match for a wizard
He DID leave a riddle.... a TOM Riddle!!!
Lavender {fem}{oc} badum cssshh!
Ayyyyyyy
kill me please
Someone put the cruciatus curse on me
No he killed him
I have some uncomfortable questions!
1.) Say if Nymphadora Tonks had been one of the seven Potters, would she have still been pregnant while being a seventeen year old boy?
2.) Can Wizards then use Pollyjuice Potion to become Witches capable of becoming pregnant and Witches to become Wizards, capable of getting someone pregnant?
3.) I also really cannot help but question how Hagrid's tiny human father managed to nail a giant? A horse and a deer are cousin species and yet cannot breed, but somehow a human and a giant can. Besides, towards the end of part 2, during the war, the giants that show up are clearly as tall as the Astronomy Tower. How does a Wizard's "secret swan" get up in there?
Answers:
1. Yes she would, the Fetus/baby doesn’t vanish, and her insides don’t change, just the outside. Like when Hermione became a cat, she didn’t swap her insides for the one of a cat, she just got a change in appearance.
2. I think is explained by one, they keep their insides, so a man would still have his parts, even as a female I believe, and if he doesn’t, he still wouldn’t have a uterus.
3. I don’t even want to think about it.
The movies did a very bad job explaining things like for example non verbal spells. In the books, non verbal spells are taught during year 6 at Hogwarts and they are very useful because your opponent doesn't have time to defend himself. But of course in the movies that's never explained, it literally would have taken 2 minutes to explain. Ugh.
There wasn't even a scene of Snape teaching DATDA.
I agree, there were defiantly things that were left out of the movies that were important. But there were also a lot which were included. The fact is, if the movies were identical to the books, firstly it would go for about 8 hours, and secondly it would get a bit boring if it was word for word with all the same stuff. J.K Rowling has said herself that the movies don’t count as canon anyway.
I understand they need to cut down on time, but they change things which is not as good as the book. In HBP they completely left out the Dursley's scene where Dumbledore visits Harry which I was looking forward to, but they replace it with a crappy cafe scene on a subway. And Dumbledore drops off Harry at the Weasley's like a dick.
Unforgivable
Secret Guy agreed.
tbh you can guess that that really easily but I agree that they should have explained it
@Sin46
Actually it's the third time 'obliviate' is used in the series. Chamber of Secrets made rather a big deal about Gilderoy Lockhart using it to steal the stories and achivements of other wizards.
If you're gonna be nitpicky assholes as you say, at least be nitpicky.
Wait a sec, you mean you're NOT going to sin the fact Harry dived in BELOW ZERO WATER in Winter to retrieve the sword of Gryffindor? I mean yes, he had to get it, but no levitation spell, no magnetism spell or some spell to keep him warm while he went to retrieve it?
Water is warmer under the ice, even though not enough for him to dive right in...
Grell Sutcliffe you're still missing the point weather it being warmer or not .. any and I mean ANY , body of water under ice will freeze people to death.
It's poorly explained in the movie, but to get the sword of Gryffindor, you have to perform a feat of bravery. So a spell would not work
You must not live in the Midwest. We do the polar plunge-which is jumping in a hole in a frozen lake for fun. Every year.
But Levitation won't work on the sword of gryffindor because it has some special powers (never specified) and I don't think there is a spell to keep you warm
When Dobby dies and he said “tell me about the rabbits, George.” I spit out my drink laughing 🤣
just as this is uploaded my oven beeps for my pizza, what a happy coincidence :)
Gibbzee Same bro. Not pizza, but some sandwiches for dinner. I'm happy that i could finish my meal with this video.
Gibbzee Pizza-Ex-Machina?
Chris Michael Aasland No, because the pizza did not cause the video too happen.
I think the problem / nice thing about these movies is that they all assume you've read the books, so they don't bother repeating exposition.
Mt_Xing its a problem not a nice thing, lots of people watch these films without reading the books, its not fair to them for the movie to not explain hardly anything
drakionclawers " its not fair to them for the movie to not explain hardly anything"
Except not really. most of these sins are really negligible to the overall story, most people wouldn't even notice them even going through multiple viewings. Also, even if they haven't read the books, I can hopefully assume most people who've watched this has watched the other movies as well. And if they were able to watch those movies and enjoy them, I dubt they really got hung up on all these little things
onoproductions101 ive never read the books, but when watching the last 3 or 4 movies, (when they were older, wiser and fighting for their life most of the time) i always wondered why they didnt use magic more often. i didnt really remember spells like what were pointed out in this vid, but didnt they train to fight in the Room of Requirement? they should have been able to do something or at least be better prepared for an attack.
onoproductions101 "most people wouldn't even notice them even going through multiple viewings"
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it actually the whole point of cinema sins ?
Mt_Xing Kind of.. i read the first four books pretty well right after they came out, and even then didn't give them the attention they deserved at the time. At which point i hadn't touched them for years, the movies came out and I saw every one. I had hardly any memory of anything besides the major points, the things the movies not only brought up, but brought up well. Seeing movies Five Six and Seven everything that needed to made sense to me. It was until a year after the seventh book pt 2 came out that i re read every single one of the books, at which point i realized the movies made pretty goods cuts. There were a few things that would have been NICE to have in them, but nothing truly needed.
Obliviate was used in Chamber of Secrets, it wasn't just made for this one
"in about half a year's time, wizards used magic to repair their house" how is this a sin?
Idk, i know many sins are comedic but sins like this arnt funny or dont make sense
Magic should be able to do things quickly. If it can do it slow, then it can do it fast. How? MAGIC
I think he was sinning the emphasis put on it being destroyed in the previous installment when it didn't really end up to be of much consequence
because with magic it could be repaired in a matter of hours and not in half an year
magic is supposed to be fast. if it's not, why don't they repair it manually ?
He wasn't caught in the power lines, he hit the force field surrounding the Tonks' place
MrCardinal5000 In the book, yeah. But don't forget that in the film they thought it was a good idea to cut out everything to do with Tonks' family. Why did we need to split it in two if we weren't going to faithfully adapt the source?
Damian Freeman fair enough
I thought 'obliviate' was for removing your ENTIRE memory, not specific things.
Wow, that must be magic!
+Hermione Watson Damn it, Hermione. You're suppose to know these things...Btw will you marry me?
+bigl4085 I've got Ron and two children!
+Radioactive Blobfish and also to change their names, don't forget
+Hermione Watson You can control obliviate. That's all there really is to it.
CinemaSins, could you point us some movies with virtually no plot holes, continuity issues and unexplained shit?
In other words, could you show us movies that went to heaven?
No movie is without sin.
Except Troll of course
If I could, I would make a movie without NO SIN, just to annoy Cinema Sins. But hey, they're such big assholes that they would find one. "The credits are too short. Ding!"
oh my goooooooooooooooood
Renê Couto e Silva that doesn't exist
I SWEAR You Say "Ex-Machina" Every Episode lol
THE BOOKS DO NOT MATTER!!!!
THE BOOKS DO NOT MATTER!!!!
THE BOOKS DO NOT MATTER!!!!
If the movie doesn't explain it, then it's a sin! If you have to read the books to understand, then its a sin! What is so hard to understand?!
Annalien but for the simple sins like the non verbal spell casting and the portkey and the minister of magic being able to apparate into the weaslys protection barrier at their house it is so easily explained through the books or the harry potter wiki
Dominik Doherty I will repeat what he said earlier.
THE BOOKS DO NOT MATTER!!!!
THE BOOKS DO NOT MATTER!!!!
THE BOOKS DO NOT MATTER!!!!
If i need to look up something that you left out in your movie, thats their fault, not mine.
Go fuck your self
AlphaKnight708 Do you want to sit through a 4 hour long movie? Thats what would have to happen to have book adaptations stand alone. If you dont like to read then thats fine, but the movies are made for the general public, not just the books fans, so they have to be shorter. The books do matter, if you dont want to better understand a movie because you refuse to read, than thats on you not them.
Dark Sloth If they can't properly explain to the audience what thing just happened, then that thing should not be in the movie. I don't care if the movie is nothing like the book, as long as it's a good movie.
So I could explain 99% of the stuff you complained about by explaining the books but these films just thought "meh fuck it, put in this with no explanation as to how/why it works so any poor bastard who hasn't read the books has to". :p
Callum Lerigo you could argue the movies are just for the fans, and there are a lot of fans, but its also rights thats its a film and that it has to make sense on its own :D
Callum Lerigo Exactly, they should be explained in the films too. Films shouldn't have to come with instruction manuals in the form of books to understand everything!
I've read the books twice through each and have a memory like a sponge so I can reason everything I see and understand, but I know many people who'd just sit staring blankly :p
Callum Lerigo you couldn't explain the arbitrary power levels of any one magician or magic spell though.
Because a Hermione could know 500 thousand spells in one scene, and then lose a fight right after. And then suddenly get rescued from an even worse situation than what made them get caught in the first place.
When the reason for why something in a story is arbitrary, it no longer becomes as exciting to watch. Because the past has no bearing on the future.
Haiiry Cake when i remember correctly hermione was written pretty consistent in the books.
If they changed that in the movie, of course he cant explain it then
"tell me about the rabbits, George"
Watched that movie like last week. Coincedence??
Skull_Gaming that's a movie?????
is that from of mice and men
3:22 he got hit by a sectum sempra only Snape can heal those wounds
Its actually dark magic which is why harrys scar never healed.
@@ogluqqychess4452 it's snapes own spell the sectum sempra and he also has a healing spell for it which was comfirmed in the books but also in the movie because he healed Draco and in the books it's shown
@@RafaelBergmans its actually not "confirmed" in the books. He gives malfoy dittany in the book which is known to heal physical wounds, even though there would be scarring.
George loses his ear. At this point even dittany would not be able to regrow his ear, but it would seal the flesh wound caused by it.
What IS confirmed in the books is that dark magic leaves scars that never heal, ie harrys scar, georges ear, the dark mark.. etc
I'm pretty sure this guy is a muggle...
He is clueless
Lol you are too buddy.
So are you virgin
Yep. Either he hasn't read any books or he's just trying to tell us how would ppl who haven't read the books understand this all as it's not explained in the movies!
Sherry M the books don't matter in this series
Woah woah woah CinemaSins! Hedwig is a girl.
StarWarsROTJ1983 That is clearly a male snowy owl, not female. I don't care if she's "supposed" to be a girl, that is not a female owl.
Males are mostly or all white (like Hedwig), females have distinct dense black and gray spots.
Lynne the Trendy Tetraodontiforme He referred to the character 'Hedwig', who is, in fact, very female.
Lynne the Trendy Tetraodontiforme
Hedwig is female, they even say so in earlier films.
You correct CinemaSins but spell "whoa" incorrectly, that amuses me. :-D
blackromeoKOK Actually the spelling depends from person to person. "Whoa" is the American way and "woah" is he English way. I always type "woah"
Apparating and disapparating are different.
Apparating is the act of appearing at the location.
Disapparating is the act of disappearing from the first location.
Say you want to use magic to go from Tokyo to America.
You'd disapparate in Tokyo and apparate in America.
yeah but if you disapear then you reappear somewhere else so your comment is dumb
Musaab Hasan What the hell is a coent?
Might be that they say "Disapperate" when the location is known. But when they know where the person wanted to go they say "he/she appareted to [location].".
What makes you say that?
But to determine it as disapparation you'd need the context of the original apparation?
The greatest mistake in all the sins was him calling Hedwig a he
@@Kaiser_MHA they did in deathly hallows part 1
Its still a hillarious video potter fanatic
RIGHT!!! You sir....do not reserve the right to sin things that are incorrect via movie world unless you are sinning correctly via the true story/book world. 🙃🙂🙃 Read the books and sin them...on a side note I love your channel
If Voldemort had allowed anyone else to kill Harry he would have won. I love this series but that's just lazy villain writing. She could have actually made Harry a competent wizard but instead chose to make him completely average and go with Shitty Villain Trope #43 to give him a fighting chance. Also because of the various zones of magical protection he can flee too, going after Harry directly failed horribly but.... Why didn't Voldemort just capture all of Harry's allies one by one? Seriously, Barty Crouch Jr ambushed and subdued Moody by himself in the fourth book/movie and he's the most formidable member of the Order of the Phoenix besides Snape and Dumbledore. Take Moody and kill him then capture, interrogate and use the Imperious Curse to take control of the remaining members in order to get to Harry! Kill or capture all of his support and leave him as alone as possible. Why wasn't that the plan since book four?! Actually speaking of the fourth book/movie..... Jr infiltrated Hogwarts using polyjuice potion...... fucking polyjuice potion... he used some second year trivial bullshit and he was actually alone with Harry multiple times! Why is it so hard for someone else to get into the school and kidnap Harry even with tightened security? Seriously for most of the series Snape is portrayed as an asshole for constantly giving Harry shit about being unremarkable in every way and relying heavily on luck and far more talented friends but..... dude's not wrong! If Voldemort wasn't such a dipshit or if he had any halfway competent lieutenants at all Harry would be dead by the fourth book and he'd have little to no problem taking over the wizarding world. But no.... instead by book seven Harry takes him out like a boss and, naturally, I loved every minute of it >:D (the book not the movie).
M. Victor Howard
According to tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/TheBadGuysAreCops, Shitty Villain Trope #43 is known as "The Bad Guys Are Cops" which is really only fulfilled near the end of this series, and hardly at all if you ignore the books.
ImperialFish I stand corrected! I guess I should reorder my badbguy tropes to match that one :)
ghost First of all calm down. You're so worked up over this you don't even realize how wrong you how are right now. Nowhere, in any of the 7 books (which iIve or 8 movies does it that only Voldemort can kill Harry or that only certain people can destroy Horcruxes. Harry, as far as anyone knows, is the first human Horcrux. Nowhere did it suggest that any special person or item was necessary to destroy the piece of Voldemort's soul in Harry. In the end it was simply the Killing Curse that destroyed it. The only reason its good for Voldemort to kill Harry is because of his mother's magical protection. That's why he survived the second time. Voldemort doesn't know that, though. Of course he wanted to be the one to kill Harry. I said that myself. That was my point. It's stupid and its a bad guy trope. Villians always have some bullshit reason they let the hero live and this is one of the most common. It's actually the only reason Voldemort loses. It's pretty obvious that Harry is the only person who can threaten him (besides Dumbledore). The smart thing would be to stay as far away from Harry as possible and Voldemort is extremely intelligent. The only reason this "only I can kill him" bullshit persists is so that Harry can survive untill the end. By the way if you're getting all of your information from the movies you probably should just stay quiet. The movies are based on the books and they don't explain a lot of shit.
M. Victor Howard I was under he impression that Harrys Mums spell kept him safe, but that Voldermort had got around that by taking his blood in that resurrection ritual or whatever, meaning that only he could kill him? The reason he survived the second curse, was because it killed the horcrux and not Harry, but in doing so, Harry recreated his mothers protection spell. As he 'died' for everyone, it meant that effectively Voldermorts magic stopped working properly. I think that was what Trelawneys prediction was supposed to be about?
+M. Victor Howard now i know this is a little old but i thought i'd add my two cents. i always got the impression that voldemort was highly egotistical and that the reason he was so obsessed with being the one to kill harry is because harry is what caused his fall from power in the first place, it was his one mistake and now he's obsessed with fixing it. probably still a trope but eh that's what i'd always gotten the impression of.
literally almost every one of these sins would have been solved if they showed ANYTHING important from the books
The books do NOT matter.
If I apparently have to read a book to understand your movie. Then you made your movie poorly.
Aethan Thorson absolutely, as a HP fan I hate the movies, they are a disgrace to the source material. Unless you read the books you'll end up with twice as many sins and/or questions.
Milena Hdez The source material is a disgrace to the source material lol.
The books go more in depth than the films do (I've read them all), but the majority of things related to magic go completely unexplained.
Shift doesn't help that rowling was making stuff up as she went along, stuff that throws every book before it into question.
SpartacusRyuuou Like what? Lol.
floo travel in book two that puts Dumbledore flying for Hogwarts to the Ministry in question, as well as portkeys in book 4. in book 3 and 4 it is implied that Harry is at least above average in power, but suddenly becomes mediocre by book 6, where he has no idea how to use fire spells against the inferi. in book 6, amortentia is heavily referencec, bringing to mind that part in book 3 that mentions Molly 'catching Arthurs attention' with a love potion, and throughout book 6, the same one where love potions do very bad things to people, Harry and Hermione's characters are utterly different from what they were in book 5. i never read book 7, so i only have bits and pieces to go on.
Sin 45: Actually no, it was first featured in the second book/movie when Gilderoy tried to erase Ron and Harry's memory and ended up erasing his own