Idealism Memes Compilation #1

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 23 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 66

  • @sonyadonnegan1983
    @sonyadonnegan1983 7 месяцев назад +2

    The Spongebob epiphenomenalist one was the funniest

  • @cherisebomb
    @cherisebomb 2 года назад +12

    "on your view: God exists of necessity, but WHATS THE CAUSE"

  • @thegreatandpowerfultrixie7
    @thegreatandpowerfultrixie7 2 года назад +6

    This synthwave music is always a vibe! 🎶

  • @leandrosilvagoncalves1939
    @leandrosilvagoncalves1939 2 года назад +10

    Wow! That's awesome! LOL ..... This deserves 1M views !

    • @MonisticIdealism
      @MonisticIdealism  2 года назад +2

      Thanks! I'm glad you enjoyed it. There's even more memes to come in the future.

  • @ChristianSt97
    @ChristianSt97 Год назад +1

    bro we need more of this

  • @maximilianstein7326
    @maximilianstein7326 2 года назад +6

    Fine work!

  • @leandrosilvagoncalves1939
    @leandrosilvagoncalves1939 2 года назад +4

    Conscious volition can fail, but Viagra always makes the damn thing goes up!

  • @TempehLiberation
    @TempehLiberation 2 года назад +2

    All I can say is...Yes

  • @namero999
    @namero999 2 года назад +2

    This was gold.

  • @TheBrunarr
    @TheBrunarr 2 года назад +7

    lmao

  • @inglestaemtudo
    @inglestaemtudo 2 года назад +4

    No Sponge Bob !!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @victorian2490
    @victorian2490 2 года назад +1

    Can you send again your discord server link? The one in the description don't work anymore

    • @MonisticIdealism
      @MonisticIdealism  2 года назад

      Yeah, thanks for the heads up: discord.gg/2EZ45yGB

  • @GreyZone7
    @GreyZone7 2 года назад

    So, murder is legal now?

  • @Dhorpatan
    @Dhorpatan 2 года назад +1

    1:36
    Why in the world would mental causation obliterate Property Dualism and Strong Emergence? That's just nonsense. And funny enough, you dishonestly conflate Property Dualism with Non-reductive physicalism, but in this video it's shown to be separate positions.🤦‍♂

    • @MonisticIdealism
      @MonisticIdealism  2 года назад +15

      Because both are in conflict with mental causation, check out the exclusion problem. What _you_ describe as properly dualism is indistinguishable from non-reductive physicalism. One could try to argue for a sort of non-reductive idealism which does hold to a duality of properties, but I would object to such a view for the same reasons I do non-reductive physicalism (e.g. the interaction problem). So no matter what version of property dualism one holds to they'll fail for the same reasons.

    • @danielhager6805
      @danielhager6805 2 года назад

      @@MonisticIdealism Couldn't someone just hold to a metaphysical theory with less logical tightness and say that there is no interaction problem?

    • @MonisticIdealism
      @MonisticIdealism  2 года назад +4

      @@danielhager6805 I'm not sure what is meant by a metaphysical theory with less logical tightness. Can you please explain what that means?

    • @danielhager6805
      @danielhager6805 2 года назад

      @@MonisticIdealism Having mental causation on a completely different physical substance and then saying you don't have to explain how it works.

    • @Dhorpatan
      @Dhorpatan 2 года назад

      @@MonisticIdealism
      I already refuted you on two of the three. Nonreductive physicalism is a contradiction in terms. Physicalism means all is physical, but the non-reductive admits that some phenomena cannot be reduced to the physical, thereby contradicting the notion that all is physical. And I already refuted the notion of an Interaction problem on Property Dualism here: watch?v=421Mdgp5B8E