The Sintashta culture - earliest chariots, fortified settlements and bronze metallurgy. Ivan Semyan
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 сен 2024
- Arkaim builders - the people of the Sintashta culture - one of the Bronze Age societies that previously were not present on our land charts, yet they had the strongest influence on the civilizations known to us. We now realize that not only resources for Mesopotamia, Egypt and other states of the Bronze Age were supplied by these peoples. Many technologies that changed the world were also generated there, on the periphery.
Ivan Semyan, archaeologist, researcher in The Caucasus Institute, Head of the "Archaeos" experimental archaeology laboratory, EXARC member.
00:00 Introduction
01:03 In understanding of the Bronze Age world as a whole, what has the discovery and exploration of the Sintashta culture given us?
03:24 When did the first chariot originate? What were the advantages of its design? How did it spread across the world?
10:46 How did the peoples of the Southern Urals contribute to the development of metal production technologies? What kind of role did they play in the Eurasian resource market?
14:01 What were the settlements of Sintashta like and what kind of economy did the people have?
17:22 How did the Sintashta culture emerge and disintegrate?
Special thanks to Chelyabinsk State museum-reserve Arkaim, N. Petrov, F. Petrov, N. Vinogradov, I. Chechushkov, L. Koryakova and others for provide illustrations.
The channel exists on private donations.
Support us www.patreon.co...
Contact us www.facebook.c...
This was fantastic, thank you very much.
Glad you enjoyed it! May ask you tell about our channel and give the link in Community on your channel? You will very foster our promoting! I can send you square pic if you write me on tropicalizmo@gmail.com
Oh shizz, it's my man!
@@proshloethepast Михаил. Раз уж так всё хорошо получилось и сам ДэнДэвисХистори тут отметился. Запилите ролик на английском про "Пепкинский курган" ! Я думаю, публика будет благодарна!😀Возможно, даже коллаб с Дэном получится. Ведь про этот могильник знает только горстка упоротых антропологов за пределами нашего (как говорят недоброжелатели) Мордора . 👹 А с умением Дэна подавать интересные истории англоязычной публике, это история может стать пушкой-бомбой! Да , я знаю DanDavisHistory
упоминал про это , но вскользь и давно. Сейчас же, после выпуска "Родина слонов" №366 пора углубиться в генетику и антропологию ИМХО😉 Удачи и успехов!
@@eprst45I agree with this guy. Dan Davis is awesome and I love getting information from the people doing the work on the ground, that could be an incredibly fruitful partnership!
One of the greatest video ever - chariots are our indoeuropena herritage!
Great video!
Thanks!
I'm indian discovering my anacestor path
Interesting findings about the exhaustion of the resources that forced these people to keep migrating rapidly to adjacent lands, sometimes taking them by force, matches the Aryan sagas about their migration and reason behind it, also told in Zoroastrian book Avesta
The descendants of the Scythians belong to the native speakers of the Türkic languages (translated from Russian)
“Scientists from the Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberia Branch of the Academy of Sciences (Russia), together with colleagues from Germany, the USA and France, conducted the largest genetic study of carriers of the Scythian culture from all over Eurasia in order to understand the demographic foundations of the history of the Scythians. It turned out that the Scythians from different ends of the Eurasian steppe are closer to each other than to other peoples, and their descendants belong to the speakers of the Turkic languages. The research results are presented in the journal Nature Communications.”
Scientists worked with genome-wide data on eight individuals and mitochondrial DNA of 96 people who lived in the first millennium BC in the Eurasian steppe, from the Black Sea region to Altai.
It turned out that behind the unity of the Scythian culture of the Iron Age, traced by archaeological discoveries, lies a genetic unity. Despite the fact that the Scythians of eastern and western Eurasia originally belonged to different peoples, over time, the flow of genes, going in both directions, led to the unification of this people throughout the steppe. As for the origin of the Scythians, the researchers distinguish two main components: the peoples of the Yamnaya culture (Eurasian nomads of the Bronze Age) and the peoples of East Asia (northern Siberia).
As for the descendants of the Scythians, genetically closest to them are modern populations living near the Scythian burials excavated by archaeologists - which indicates some continuity between population groups. The descendants of the Western Scythians can be found among the various peoples of the Caucasus and Central Asia, and the eastern ones - only among the Turkic-speaking peoples (the Kypchak language group). The last link requires a separate study: it is usually believed that the expansion of the Turkic languages in Eurasia began much later, from the 6th century AD. The influence of the Scythians on the ethnogenesis of the Turkic peoples can be clarified in the framework of future genetic studies.
(the link is deleted for an unknown reason...
www.sib-science.info/ru/institutes/skify-okazalis-predkami-03032017?fbclid=IwAR0D6fefbc_mu549OpNgNDHqBSOwAztb1Ad5uIBTrGNUx-WwN5g9WrPXiA8 )
Потомки Cкифов принадлежат к носителям Tюркских языков
Ученые из Института цитологии и генетики СО РАН вместе с коллегами из Германии, США и Франции провели крупнейшее генетическое исследование носителей скифской культуры со всей Евразии, чтобы понять демографические основы истории скифов. Оказалось, что скифы с разных концов евразийской степи друг другу ближе, чем другим народам, а их потомки принадлежат к носителям тюркских языков. Результаты исследования представлены в журнале Nature Communications.
Ученые работали с полногеномными данными по восьми индивидам и митоходриальной ДНК 96 человек, живших в первом тысячелетии до нашей эры в евразийской степи, от Причерноморья до Алтая.
Выяснилось, что за единством скифской культуры железного века, прослеживаемым по археологическим открытиям, лежит и генетическое единство. Несмотря на то, что скифы восточной и западной Евразии исходно принадлежали к различным народам, со временем поток генов, шедший в обеих направлениях, привел к унификации этого народа по всей степи. Что касается происхождения скифов, то исследователи выделяют два основных компонента: народы ямной культуры (евразийские кочевники бронзового века) и народы восточной Азии (северной Сибири).
Что же касается потомков скифов, то генетически ближе всего к ним современные популяции, обитающие недалеко от скифских захоронений, раскопанных археологами - что говорит о некоторой преемственности между группами населения. Потомков западных скифов можно найти среди различных народов Кавказа и Средней Азии, а восточных - лишь среди тюркоязычных народов (кыпчакская языковая группа). Последняя связка требует отдельного исследования: обычно считается, что экспансия тюркских языков в Евразии началась гораздо позже, от VI века нашей эры. Влияние скифов на этногенез тюркских народов может быть выяснено в рамках будущих генетических исследований.
The Scythians were the precursor to the warriors who came later like the Huns and the Turks. They are descended from what is called andronovo horizon they are Indo-Iranian horse nomads Iranians speaker, they have Iranian names.
@@VerbalWarrior162what is a turk ? They always claim turk
I've never seen a real one
Kyrgyz ? They are 63% r1a
Or how about people in turkey who look like Greeks Armenian kurds
It's like saying people from Jamaica are British because they speak English😊
Очень важно, рассуждая о предках и потомков скифов, всегда указывать количество неандертальских генов. Это поможет видеть последовательность народов и держать нос по ветру.
Wonderful to get these insights into such an important but neglected culture. Thank you!
Glad you enjoyed it!
@@proshloethepastalso they deleted caucasian dna and Elam dna of yamnaya looks like they took yamnaya women and pushed them to western Europe
Quite intriguing, means bronze age is way more then Egypt and Babylonia. Looking forward for more videos on topics, almost not covered by mainstream channels.
Indeed, I am particularly curious about what happened in places like Ireland and all along the Atlantic coast trade networks at the beginning of the bronze age!
Indeed, tin and copper were being mined in Iberia too, in addition to Britain and other sites in Europe. There are many peripheral cultures to Mesopotamia and Egypt that deserve much more recognition.
These were the true Aryan who later became the fish eating Brahmins of India such weapons were used in Mahabharata war and invented fishing. Hooks
I am of Brahmin caste ⚔️🕉️⚔️
no, you pajeet😂
So, is se kya!!?
Excellent! Thanks for your work! We are waiting for your first thousand of subscribers. And for second one and so on up to silver button ;)
P.S. just 398 now (for memory)
2023-03-30 21:09
Very very good report !!!
The DNA REPORT I SAW ALMOST MATCHES MY ANCESTOR DNA REPORT ..
I wonder what their relationship was like with the actual Uralics at that time, since there are Indo-Iranic loan words in Estonian & Finnish. Even some older words from other Indo-European cultures. (from what people have told me so who knows if they’re right or not)
Dan Davis sent me! Subscribed!!
This was awesome. Great discussion by Dr. Semyan! Greetings from Seoul, Korea.
My question is did you say "hold my beer" before you started riding around in that chariot?
The Sintashta people were R1a haplogroup same as Corded Ware Culture or Battle Axe Culture. Same as today scandinavians east germans polish and north west russians
Entonces explica esto: 42´03% granjero Europeo, 26´44% sintashta, 13,16% Cáucaso, 13,06% Asia occidental, 0´41% siberiano, 1,46% Balochi, S .Indio 1,09%, 0´15% SE. asiático, 2,21% Subsahara, no soy de ese haplogrupo y no soy ni ruso ni polaco pero mi haplogrupo esta desde Samara en Rusia, la cultura Corded en Alemania, en el Tirol y en otro sitio que no te digo e igual te sorprende....
Write in English.
Ancestor indo aryan
And Iranic peoples too
The Scythians were the precursor to the warriors who came later like the Huns and the Turks. They are descended from what is called andronovo horizon they are Indo-Iranian horse nomads Iranians speaker, they have Iranian names.
Fantastic video, thank you for both showing us this awesome but oft neglected culture, but also being a reminder that science is not a "western" pursuit, but is an international pursuit!
Thank you. That was a rare video that gives information as densly packed as a scientific article. I never felt like skipping a frame. Because the Shintasa are situated at an historic base of our modern cultures it seems to me that the more we can learn about the Shintasa the more we can learn about ourselves.
Dang , one of the best videos I've seen on this topic
Thank you for this video, Dan. I had never heard of this civilisation before although I've seen videos re chariot burials on the Steppes.
5:55 Brahmins of only Eastern UP & Bihar have high sintashta-like ancestry(~27-30%), rest of the brahmins from India do not have really high sintashta-like ancestry. Yet their status is still high.
Steppe is present all over North-West South Asia, doesn't follow any social hierarchy. The biraadari groups from North-West South Asia have equally high or even higher sintashta-like ancestry(22-42%). And their social status has often been of outcastes or lower castes. Brahmins of North-West or proper Northern Indian states are 23-25% sintashta, so not high.
I don't get this weird obsession to selectively mention brahmins, while conveniently ignoring everything else. Feeds into the misinformation that steppe folks came & set some racial hierarchy, when the reality was that they were mixing with everybody from 1800BCE to 0CE _(the latter being when endogamy started in ancient India, when birth become more important than merit)._
Thanks Paxmat from Kyrgyzstan ❤
Welcome!
Sintashta people are R1A and Yamnaya are R1B. This means they were unrelated since these two halpogroups diverged more than 20,000 year ago. This is a well known fact. I'm surprised that the authors of this video don't know this. As to what happened to the Yamnaya, they were replaced with the R1A Fatyanovo people in what is now Russia and eastern Europe around 2700 BCE.
You can have different ydna haplogroups and still be very closely related at an autosomal level which the Indo Europeans tribes were 🤦
R1a is mostly common in India. Along with R2. Suggesting R diverted into R1 and R2 and R1 diverted to R1a and R1B who might have taken on to Europe later on
@@tsamgurkhanR1A is concentrated in the upper caste Indians. This is due to the caste system set up by the Aryan incursion. We have a good idea where R1 originated. The two oldest R1a samples in ancient DNA come from northern Russia & Ukraine (13k YBP). The oldest R DNA is also from Siberia (24k YBP). There is no evidence of R1a haplogroup in the Indian subcontinent before roughly 2000 BCE.
@@pkorolov R1a and it's subclaude are prevalent in all Indians, including Tribals and South Indians. I corroborate your fact that first R* is from Siberia. But one specimen doesn't prove the fact that they are originating there. Even Peter A. Underhill Study mentions that the origin might be in Iran region. Also, since, these migrations didn't happen in one day, they moved like temporary settlements, the movement of mtDNA doesn't corroborate with the claim. It cannot be that "Aryans" were only "Male" with no females and they came and settled. And there are three studies which proposed origin of R1a in South Asia, West Asia and Central Asia (not Steppes) and existence of markers beyond 18000 years. How come R1A1A has high STR in all castes in India, with oldest datings of R1a in India belonging to Saharia Tribe of Central India? And origin of ancestor with R1 is no where near Europe. It's Siberia, South Asia or South West Asia. Also, the ancestral R is said to be Indian Subcontinent or North Asia (not Russia but around Tajikstan, Kyrgyzstan).
@@Kuningaz93 Sure all modern humans share something like 99% of their DNA with homo erectus, of course this doesn't tell us much. This is why whole DNA statistical analysis in not very useful. On the other hand, Y- chromosome SNPs and their mutation rates provide a very accurate estimate for relatedness between any two individuals. Sure there could have been some mixing due to raids for females between these groups, but logically this would have provided a relatively minor contribution to Fatyanovo. As for Yamnaya, we know that they were responsible for the genocide of the Neolithic farmers. From the data we have, they invaded as mostly male bands and had taken neolithic farmer women as wives. As for spread of Indo-European language, I think this happened mostly due to trade, as the more nomadic Yamnaya needed the goods provided by the pastoral Fatyanovo culture (horses, cattle, copper, and wagons) also some assimilation due to thousands of years of cultural interaction.
Much thanks to Soviet archeologists for preserving the tombs of our ancient Indo-Iranic ancestors. It's a pity Pakistanis think their pre-Islamic ancestors followed modern Brahamnistic traditions. Vedic Aryans were indeed beef eaters and buried their dead, not burned them. Pakistanis need to get more informed about their glorious pre-Islamic history. Also thank you for using *Indo-Iranic* and not "Indo-Iranian."
They believed in Indra ,varuna , shiva you are soo selective?
@@ALOK-pe5fp They did not. They were polytheists but they weren't idol worshipers.
@@نادرالیراحمان idiot thor idol , scythian god idol, kartos idol are found from Europe, painting of gods and praying fire god , everything was there
@@ALOK-pe5fp Shivites and others came to Pakistan more recently during the British Raj. Sindh for example was Bhuddist during Muhammed Bin Qasim's time.
@@نادرالیراحمان Hinduism always dominated in South Asia, because it was not only religion but also something ancestral, khandhar, Rawalpindi .. many many other have sanskrit derived names , before you guys got converted 😂
I believe they were the people who came to India and were Aryans. They introduced horse chariots. If you search Mahabharata or any other North Indian Old Hindu/Sanatan religion stories, you will find similar pictures. They came from the northern part, which is why they are mostly settled in northern parts of India. Their skin color doesn’t match that of tribal Indians and South Indian people, which is why Sanskrit has so many similar words with the Russian language. Mainly they are Brahmins, Shatriyas, Jats, Vaishya’s
They came from Thrace(Bulgaria). The Russian language is based on Bulgarian ( old church Slavonic as they renamed it).
One day the Bulgarian ( Thracian) language would be recognised as proto Sanskrit and proto Slavic.
The settlements remind me of a wasp nest!
In any case, this was a very interesting documentary. I hope your research can go forward despite the awful situation in Russia. Stay safe, young man!
They didn't originally come from the Steppes but Balkans. They were Thracians ( Aryans) After the Black sea flood they spread in all directions. They just had many tribal names not Thracians.The Minoans and Myceneans are Thracians but academia pretends not to know
надеюсь русскоговорящая версия так же будет
Это перевод с русской версии на исходном канале
Она есть.ruclips.net/video/-CGY3nRi2K4/видео.html , ruclips.net/video/f7kwz_5Y5Nk/видео.html
The Scythians were the precursor to the warriors who came later like the Huns and the Turks. They are descended from what is called andronovo horizon they are Indo-Iranian horse nomads Iranians speaker, they have Iranian names.
The Turks and Huns were a mix of Tokharians (Afanassievo Culture, 100% similar with Yamnaya people but deeply located in Asia) and Mongols. The Tokharians, founders of the Kushan Empire, were more familiar to the Greeks than to the Iranians.
They have many names in many cultures.
They were extremely mobile males that mated with indigenous females.
They did this everywhere they went .
@@dionisiodussart5629 Haplogroup U2 was identified in Russia in a 30,000 year old Cro-Magnon. Scholars believe that this group, after migrating north, became the dominant lineage among the foragers who eventually settled in Central Asia and South Asia and became the Indo-Iranian groups.
Haplogroup F is an ancestral branch in the Y-DNA tree. It is the parent haplogroup to several other Y-DNA haplogroups, including G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, and T. Haplogroup F represents a deep ancestral lineage.
Haplogroup IJ originated on the Iranian platue 49 000 - 44 000 years ago. Haplogroup IJ became Haplogroup J in West Asia and Haplogroup I in Europe.
R1b is Indo-European. the oldest R1b subplate was found on the Iranian plateau. R1a is believed to have been the dominant haplogroup among the northern and eastern Proto-Indo-European tribes, which evolved into the Indo-Iranian, Thracian, Baltic and Slavic peoples. The Proto-Indo-Europeans originated with the Yamna culture people (3300-2500 BC). and migrated to Central Europe and created the Corded Ware culture.
Haplogroup IJ originated on the Iranian platue 49 000 - 44 000 years ago. Haplogroup IJ became Haplogroup J in West Asia and Haplogroup I in Europe
Turks and turkic language are completely different than indo-iranians people and language and come from different ancestry. Tokharians/Toranians were Iranic people of the east and again completely different than turks or mongols. the first turkic people that history knows about are the Avars that lived somewhere north of current mongolia and siberia.
@@VerbalWarrior162it was U mtdna
Not U2 that's later
This was absolutely fascinating. Thank you so much for your scholarship, bringing light and understanding to this neglected era. I am enriched! We are all enriched. Thanks again, from Florida.
Fantastic video. Liked, subscribed, might even leave a comment...
Bırakın bu Hint Avrupa yalanını.
Sintashta people looker extremely nordic
You had a chat with a couple of them or? Odd thing to care about either way.
@@cholst1 that's not a very sharp question there bud, calm the smugness, you aren't dealing with someone self centered and oblivious, I also make fun of such people, but anyways, we can dwell into genetics and anthropology on this matter if you want, it'll be a very easy convo on my side.
@@jasrajsandhu1658 I wasnt the one making a sweeping statement about the skin color of people who lived thousands of years ago. Not very sharp statement there bud.
@@cholst1 thinking that skin color is the only attribute that can constitute a whole phenotype is absurd
No look at the facial reconstructions. Their skulls were very different from Nordic peoples.
It’s crazy that everyone in Europe is technically descendants of these steppe herders but it appears that they all forgot. I saw a video saying that the mythic centaurs are the Greeks way of paying homage to the steppe herders. But wouldn’t they know that they are descendants of them?
Thank you for this video. I became interested in Sintashta after reading The Horse, The Wheel and Language shortly after it was published. Since then it appears that David Antony has become perhaps the most quoted author on the subject matter. This may be partly due to the dearth of translation into English from Russian sources. I have been a “horse person” all my life. Yet, despite a degree in history it never occurred to me that horses themselves would be a topic of interest in archaeology. So I was delighted to find the amount work on the subject. It can be argued that without the conjunction of the horse and the wheel that humans would not have become the kind of species they are today. The vista with horses is so much vaster than without them. As to the question of the use of the chariots: I find find it inconceivable that once they were developed and had demonstrated speed that adventurous drivers would not start to race them.
Indoeuropeans cotrolled a big part of aisa. Include turcikmongols in th east 😎
Amazing video! You went into great detail about what they were good at (surviving in the cold) and not good at (agriculture). Please make similar videos about Yamnaya and the Corded Wave cultures.
Svaka čast na ovakav savršeno istražen dokumentar
You sound a lot like borat, thank you
Were exact l'y?
It's South Urals.
I learned from your presentation. Thank You.
The two wheeled chariot unearthed from Sinauli, North India is dated to 1900 BC!
"These Aryan people migrated southward into South Asia, ushering in the Vedic period around 1750 BCE. Shortly after this, about 1700 BCE, evidence of chariots appears in Asia-Minor.[11]
The earliest fully developed spoke-wheeled horse chariots are from the chariot burials of the Andronovo (Timber-Grave) sites of the Sintashta-Petrovka Proto-Indo-Iranian culture in modern Russia and Kazakhstan from around 2000 BCE."
"Majul further noted that "the rituals relating to the Sanauli burials showed close affinity with Vedic rituals,[web 1] and stated that "the dating of the Mahabharata is around 1750 BCE."[web 5] According to Asko Parpola these finds were ox-pulled carts, indicating that these burials are related to an early Aryan migration of Proto-Indo-Iranian speaking people into the Indian subcontinent,[25] "forming then the ruling elite of a major Late Harappan settlement. "
It's very easy to find answers by simply searching on the Web 😊
So they are the ancestors of the Sumerians, Mesopotamians etc. Is that correct?
They were semitic people. Totally different racial/language family
No, they are different races and eras.
Interesting and very informative I don’t watch the whole video to the end yet and I may have missed some of what you said. The spread of the wheel and that technology from the urals?, people you’re mentioning , did you mention Sumerian , Mesopotamia. . Traditionally they been mentioned as the inventors , earliest known users of the wheel 🛞.. And first use of the wheel was for pottery.. 😳🤔🤔🤷♂️🤷♂️ I’m going to listen to the rest of your vid , it’s very interesting
Sintashta?????? I am Sinto-meot do WE Sintis vone from There maybe.... That would explain more then 350 North Caucasian words in Our language.... 😮 Nobody of us believe we are sindhis of sindh but sindi of scxthia and sintianer apsinthii of thracia and Sintashta maybe??? Origin
Are the Russians the descendants of the Scythians: no, we are not Scythians!
“... Plato wrote that the Sarmatians in everyday life are no different from the Scythians, they speak their language, but incorrectly. In other words, both the Sarmatians and the Scythians belonged to the kindred pra-Türkic peoples. Therefore, obviously, the Scythians were not destroyed by the Sarmatians, but assimilated by them.
In the IV century, the Sarmatians, in turn, were assimilated by the Huns, known in Europe as the Huns, immigrants from Central Asia, still a pra-Turkic people.”
Являются ли русские потомками скифов: нет, не скифы мы!
“…Платон писал, что сарматы в быту ничем не отличаются от скифов, говорят на их языке, но неправильно. Другими словами, и сарматы, и скифы принадлежали с родственным праTюркским народам. Поэтому, очевидно, скифы не были уничтожены сарматами, а ассимилированы ими.
В IV веке сарматы, в свою очередь, были ассимилированы хуннами, известными в Европе как гунны, выходцами из Центральной Азии, все так же праTюркским народом.”
zen.yandex.ru/media/sibguide/iavliaiutsia-li-russkie-potomkami-skifov-net-ne-skify-my-5e82be45a4b70d29713d37ca?fbclid=IwAR0T7U5IOW_mclKaq-ainvbdlSehvuFH0fyg5a2qM3IerxrthvFMsDlhcd4
31 March 2020
Fascinating video and a good insight into a culture I have only just heard of. I love this kind of content. Thank you.
There is no genetic similarity to the Yanmaya culture. No evidence that Sintashta culture has any similarity to the Yanmaya culture.
They are never Ido-European or Arian, nor Prpto Indio Iranian. Please provide evidence
Yes, they interacted with one another and can be found in one another in remains.
These were an extremely mobile people.
@@acaydia2982ямная культура и синташтинская культура не могли взаимодействовать ни в чем, нигде и никак. От слова совсем.
Corded ware
R1A reverse migration
A "kocsi - azoknak a találmánya - akiket meg sem emlitenek ! .....
*
Steppe = szkytia..... !
:)
1:01 I’m so jealous of these guys. I often have dreams of riding into battle atop a chariot.
I am curious though; at one point the Sintashta were thought to be part of the Andronovo horizon, what caused the archeologists to reclassify them as their own culture?
13:30 wow, I had never heard that about the tin! This is so packed with great information. Excellent presentation.
Spaceba bolshoi!
One thing I wanted to add about the Greeks; the Greeks often talk about how ancient the Scythians culture and people were, and if the Mycenaeans had contact with the Sintashta is it plausible that they considered the Scythians, Sintashta and Andronovo one in the same?
Zhirinovsky about the Scythians, Polovtsy, Pechenegs, Turks as one people (sec 30-45)!
Jirinovski o skifax, polovtsax, peceneqax, turkax kak ob odnom narode (sek 30-45)!
Zhirinovski: İskitler, Peçenekler, Türkler bir xalqdır (sn 30-45)!
ruclips.net/video/kIB41Cj2v5E/видео.html
Хотите, расскажу, что говорил мой парикмахер по поводу печенегах и половцах?
Did the Sintasha culture influence Ancient Greece?
Not directly, they were quite far away in space and time, although their Persian descendants would have some cultural influence on Ancient Greece.
@@SomasAcademy And Scythians (not on culture tho)
Step, Nomad/Seminomad, Horse/Horse milk+meat eaters/Horse sacrifices/Horse riders/Joint human+horse burials/ Trousers, Kurgan culture is a protoTurk culture (Sintashtan, Cimmerian, Scythian, Sak, Sarmatian, Massaget, Thracian/Frakian, Hun, Alan, Avar, Bulgar, Magyar, Peceneg, Khazar, Tatar...) from Altai to the Danube!
Toponims Ural, Sibir, Tayga, Alp, Sintashta, Alashya, Alaska, Altay, AyuTash (=Denisov, after XVIII century),Tartar, Tatar, etc, etc. are turkic words…
Aryan***
You Turks are half Aryan also but not your Proto Turk ancestors who stole our glorious lands
Fantastic video thank you brother.👍💯