Видео

Welcome!

Welcome

Thank you! We are doing our best )

Welcome aboard!

"These Aryan people migrated southward into South Asia, ushering in the Vedic period around 1750 BCE. Shortly after this, about 1700 BCE, evidence of chariots appears in Asia-Minor.[11] The earliest fully developed spoke-wheeled horse chariots are from the chariot burials of the Andronovo (Timber-Grave) sites of the Sintashta-Petrovka Proto-Indo-Iranian culture in modern Russia and Kazakhstan from around 2000 BCE." "Majul further noted that "the rituals relating to the Sanauli burials showed close affinity with Vedic rituals,[web 1] and stated that "the dating of the Mahabharata is around 1750 BCE."[web 5] According to Asko Parpola these finds were ox-pulled carts, indicating that these burials are related to an early Aryan migration of Proto-Indo-Iranian speaking people into the Indian subcontinent,[25] "forming then the ruling elite of a major Late Harappan settlement. " It's very easy to find answers by simply searching on the Web 😊

Frost Nations 😁

You're so welcome!

Will do it )

Considering some of the humans I have encountered, I think you may be mistaken...

@@fransmars1645 My point is, if we just claim "Oh, they are one of us" and the concept doesn't even occur to "them", it can't be true.

Well, look around, some Humans are d*mber than you think.

Entonces explica esto: 42´03% granjero Europeo, 26´44% sintashta, 13,16% Cáucaso, 13,06% Asia occidental, 0´41% siberiano, 1,46% Balochi, S .Indio 1,09%, 0´15% SE. asiático, 2,21% Subsahara, no soy de ese haplogrupo y no soy ni ruso ni polaco pero mi haplogrupo esta desde Samara en Rusia, la cultura Corded en Alemania, en el Tirol y en otro sitio que no te digo e igual te sorprende....

Write in English.

They came from Thrace(Bulgaria). The Russian language is based on Bulgarian ( old church Slavonic as they renamed it). One day the Bulgarian ( Thracian) language would be recognised as proto Sanskrit and proto Slavic.

Yes, they interacted with one another and can be found in one another in remains. These were an extremely mobile people.

​@@acaydia2982ямная культура и синташтинская культура не могли взаимодействовать ни в чем, нигде и никак. От слова совсем.

Corded ware R1A reverse migration

I am curious though; at one point the Sintashta were thought to be part of the Andronovo horizon, what caused the archeologists to reclassify them as their own culture?

13:30 wow, I had never heard that about the tin! This is so packed with great information. Excellent presentation.

Spaceba bolshoi!

One thing I wanted to add about the Greeks; the Greeks often talk about how ancient the Scythians culture and people were, and if the Mycenaeans had contact with the Sintashta is it plausible that they considered the Scythians, Sintashta and Andronovo one in the same?

The Turks and Huns were a mix of Tokharians (Afanassievo Culture, 100% similar with Yamnaya people but deeply located in Asia) and Mongols. The Tokharians, founders of the Kushan Empire, were more familiar to the Greeks than to the Iranians.

They have many names in many cultures. They were extremely mobile males that mated with indigenous females. They did this everywhere they went .

@@dionisiodussart5629 Haplogroup U2 was identified in Russia in a 30,000 year old Cro-Magnon. Scholars believe that this group, after migrating north, became the dominant lineage among the foragers who eventually settled in Central Asia and South Asia and became the Indo-Iranian groups. Haplogroup F is an ancestral branch in the Y-DNA tree. It is the parent haplogroup to several other Y-DNA haplogroups, including G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, and T. Haplogroup F represents a deep ancestral lineage. Haplogroup IJ originated on the Iranian platue 49 000 - 44 000 years ago. Haplogroup IJ became Haplogroup J in West Asia and Haplogroup I in Europe. R1b is Indo-European. the oldest R1b subplate was found on the Iranian plateau. R1a is believed to have been the dominant haplogroup among the northern and eastern Proto-Indo-European tribes, which evolved into the Indo-Iranian, Thracian, Baltic and Slavic peoples. The Proto-Indo-Europeans originated with the Yamna culture people (3300-2500 BC). and migrated to Central Europe and created the Corded Ware culture. Haplogroup IJ originated on the Iranian platue 49 000 - 44 000 years ago. Haplogroup IJ became Haplogroup J in West Asia and Haplogroup I in Europe

Turks and turkic language are completely different than indo-iranians people and language and come from different ancestry. Tokharians/Toranians were Iranic people of the east and again completely different than turks or mongols. the first turkic people that history knows about are the Avars that lived somewhere north of current mongolia and siberia.

​@@VerbalWarrior162it was U mtdna Not U2 that's later

You can have different ydna haplogroups and still be very closely related at an autosomal level which the Indo Europeans tribes were 🤦

R1a is mostly common in India. Along with R2. Suggesting R diverted into R1 and R2 and R1 diverted to R1a and R1B who might have taken on to Europe later on

@@tsamgurkhanR1A is concentrated in the upper caste Indians. This is due to the caste system set up by the Aryan incursion. We have a good idea where R1 originated. The two oldest R1a samples in ancient DNA come from northern Russia & Ukraine (13k YBP). The oldest R DNA is also from Siberia (24k YBP). There is no evidence of R1a haplogroup in the Indian subcontinent before roughly 2000 BCE.

@@pkorolov R1a and it's subclaude are prevalent in all Indians, including Tribals and South Indians. I corroborate your fact that first R* is from Siberia. But one specimen doesn't prove the fact that they are originating there. Even Peter A. Underhill Study mentions that the origin might be in Iran region. Also, since, these migrations didn't happen in one day, they moved like temporary settlements, the movement of mtDNA doesn't corroborate with the claim. It cannot be that "Aryans" were only "Male" with no females and they came and settled. And there are three studies which proposed origin of R1a in South Asia, West Asia and Central Asia (not Steppes) and existence of markers beyond 18000 years. How come R1A1A has high STR in all castes in India, with oldest datings of R1a in India belonging to Saharia Tribe of Central India? And origin of ancestor with R1 is no where near Europe. It's Siberia, South Asia or South West Asia. Also, the ancestral R is said to be Indian Subcontinent or North Asia (not Russia but around Tajikstan, Kyrgyzstan).

@@JRANDALL93 Sure all modern humans share something like 99% of their DNA with homo erectus, of course this doesn't tell us much. This is why whole DNA statistical analysis in not very useful. On the other hand, Y- chromosome SNPs and their mutation rates provide a very accurate estimate for relatedness between any two individuals. Sure there could have been some mixing due to raids for females between these groups, but logically this would have provided a relatively minor contribution to Fatyanovo. As for Yamnaya, we know that they were responsible for the genocide of the Neolithic farmers. From the data we have, they invaded as mostly male bands and had taken neolithic farmer women as wives. As for spread of Indo-European language, I think this happened mostly due to trade, as the more nomadic Yamnaya needed the goods provided by the pastoral Fatyanovo culture (horses, cattle, copper, and wagons) also some assimilation due to thousands of years of cultural interaction.

no, you pajeet😂

So, is se kya!!?

Absolutely!