Roger Federer's cellphone keeps ringing at press conference
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 25 окт 2013
- at 11:30pm after his match against Grigor Dimitrov.
His reactions (thanks for the subtitle translation from RF.commer): "this isn't possible, this has never happened before..."
Second time he said 'it's too late to be calling'
Then "you know what, I'm going to turn my phone off" "This can't be happening, it's so embarrassing." Then he was asked "Do you know who it is?" he says, "It's not important, at this hour, no one can be important."
Then at the end "Now I have to make a call."
Typical Rog, ignoring my calls again..
he has a peRFect French !
Compared to this period his face is much older now. Really noticeable.
amazing roger...
weak telephone era
aha it's so cute how he's embarassed
What language is he speaking in? French? It isn't German or Swiss German.
he speaks in this video: swiss german and french. the most of the time french...
0:10 - 0:20 is swiss german the rest is french
you really cant tell ?
It's Djokovic calling.
'apres cette heure la, personne nest important' mdrr
¡Que bello se ve con esa camiseta! Y la cara que ponia cada vez que le llamaban! :D Yo quiero su whatsapp!!! :(
Federer speaks several languages fluent not just Swiss German. Novak Djokovic speaks 11 Lanuages fluent.
IDK if Novak speaks the other languages fluently iirc he doesn't do press in that many of them, that's kind of my barometer for fluency. I'm sure he can speak 11, but to carry on a conversation and not just phrases idk. Roger clearly has some understanding of Swedish, Italian and Spanish, and after 16 years with Mirka I'm guessing he has a passing understanding of Slovak but he doesn't do press in them.
Jamie zafir taxi is pronounced similarly in 11 languages so I guess I am fluent in 11 languages as well.😯😯😯😯😯😯😯😝😝
the most important thing is: how many languages do you speak? ...
He speaks Serbian English, French and Italian the best
Jamie Zafir where are you getting your information he speaks 5, 11 my ass
The point is not that Roger is not a great player. It is just his numbers are bloated. One thing no one talks about in all this is the US messed up. They did not try to protect Sampras record. Even if Roger would have equaled or surpassed 13, he wouldnwouldn't have 20. The US failed to produce two quality players and not just one with Roddick. If you have two top tens or a top ten and twenty, they will push each other. Roddick was not taught to keep the ball in before he implemented power. And if he had another player from the US that was strong then he or the other player could have beat Roger. As it was Roddick should have won the 2010 Wimbeldon final. He was up a set and had a chance to go up 2-1 in sets but missed an easy shot on set point as as a tie breaker. The fifth set went game for game. And Roddick was never broken by Federer on his serve until that later 5th game. He should have won. That would be one less for Roger. And I know people can cite match fimals Roger may have won but didn't, though there are others he did win that he was lucky himself outside Roddick as the final at Wimbeldon that went 5 sets with Nadal he won. But the US messed up in the year 2000. They always had two players ready to replace others, not one. When they knew Sampras and Agassi were winding down, they should have prepared more for the future. Btw, did you know in the French Open tat Roger won in 2009 he had two matches he was down 2-0 or 2-1 in sets to del Potro and Tommy Haas. Haas was only 5 points from winning. That was Roger's only otherwise he wouldn't have a career grandslam. And one last bit. I read that from 2003-2007 the players who made it to the semifinals of each GS out side Roddick 8 times dropped down to 3 or less. This is telling as it shows different players in the semifinals quite often meaning inconsistency of players. That gives insight into the weakness of that 5 years Roger won 13. The semifinal appearance consistency at GSs tell alot.
hahaha what??? are you crazy...20 titles boy! take a bow! G.O.A.T.
You obviously don't pay attention to details. Numbers are just without details.
Lendl's the greatest. Tougher competion and the consistency easily matched. Roger didn't use a wooden racket nor did he not have little money to pay for top notch training and all. He also did not live under communism like Lendl did. Paper champion dummy.
I don’t understand how a country can just create players to replace others. It’s not their wish. It depends on who’s playing good at that moment.
@@markedwards7313 i hava seen a lot of retarded people in my 26 years of age, but you my friend are the greatest