Oh! During the entire video I was just thinking to myself that your voice sounds so familiar, and now it finally hit me - you sound exactly like Mark Hamill!
CameraRec Toby here is my dilemma... I am struggling between 55-250 STM and the 70-200L F4 IS. I know that their price difference is immense and I would really prefer to keep my wallet fat and happy. On the other hand, I do not want to buy something now that I might regret later and end up spending more money on the long run. Is the 55-250 that good? Or I will be missing the L features? I am a hobbyist photographer, I only do stills and usually that's portrait or landscape stuff. What do you think I should do?
I know this is a real late reply but if you are not making money shooting photos then I wouldn't bother with the "L" lenses. The durability is what makes the lens more expensive than the picture quality. So if you are a hobbist then you should definitely get the 55-250STM. Most people wouldn't be able to tell the difference between a picture taken with the STM lens or an L lens. I would spend money on other accessories such as speed light which would make your picture look more professional. I hope this helps.
Africa4science thanks for the feedback. Not late at all, as I have yet to make up my mind. In fact I chose to hold back, in case sigma released an art 50-135 for cropped cameras. Unfortunately, no sign of that happening...
After researching left,right, up and down I took delivery two weeks ago of my Canon 70D plus the 18-55 kit and the older but (new and unused) 55-250 IS II. Granted I am 52 and deafer than average, but I have not found the focusing noise to be an issue. It probably helps that I use a Rhode Stereo Videomic Pro. As a 'Camera + 2 lenses bundle' I like the full 18-250mm (28-400 in the 70D crop sensor) range over the 18-135 kit lens as I live on a Game Ranch and will use the extra reach. I reckon Toby is very correct in recommending the Canon 70D together with the 18-55 and the 55-250. When I have sold some of my yearling bulls in December I plan to pick up a wide-angle lens as per Toby's recommendation for filming my real-estate videos. That will be it for me on lenses. Need money for Go-Pro and Quadcopter (my excuse is to do aerial footage of farms I sell) real reason = kewl Big Boy Toy :-) Thanks for another honest and succinct video Toby.
The Big Boy Toy is on my list too - I only need the quad copter but I don't have ANY excuses to buy so I don't think it will be under my xmas tree this year. I have done some testing with a rode mic and a few lenses - haven't actually viewed the results yet but I suspect that is solving the lens noise for you. Thanks for your input!
A lot of people says, Changing the lens would be tedious, and it is a good idea to have a 18--250mm Lens rather than getting both 18-55 and 55-250mm Lenses. Is it really that inconvenient to Change Lenses?
I have the Canon 100D (SL1) and bought the 55-250mm IS non STM to go with it, only to find a few months later, that Canon brought out the STM version. I also have the 18-135 STM, and the difference in the image quality (in favour of the 18-135) is IMHO a lot better. Question - would it be worth upgrading to the 55-250mm STM version and selling off the non STM version? Thanks for your video by the way!
Toby, I have a Canon 70D. so much debate internally about a telephoto zoom. I shoot 95% stills. Most people say the 55-250mm STM is excellent value, but some are split between excellent image quality and mediocre IQ. I can get all lenses second hand, so the STM is around $250, 70-200 F4 IS around $800 with 1.4x TC another $200, and a 70-300 L IS for around $1000. All choices would give me 5.6 at the long end. What I am unsure of is the IQ worth the 4x price tag of these L lenses? are they really 4x better? I understand that of these 3 the IS is actually worse or older on the 70-200 F4 IS. If the IQ isn't hugely different, perhaps I'd be better off getting the STM used and another prime. I don't know how much marketing is affecting my brain right now...
I love to take pictures for small animals and birds. I use Canon T4i body. I have a Tamron 28-200 and a Sigma 70-300. Both are poor in quality. I need a 300 mm range but with a smaller budget. My question is Canon 70-300 a good choice or I should consider a 300 mm FD prime?
Great review. Which one should I buy This one or Tamron 18-200 mm. Becoz with this I will have to carry the 18-55 also. What is your view about the image quality? Please help
Thank you its really helped me in order to buy my new lens , I am taking 100% according to your advise for this 55/250 STM lens . Thank you for such a great help and review . :)
Hi, nice review ! You said in the video that 55-250 will be enough for 99%, because that extra money is not worth for the 70-300 IS USM. I would like to know if the Tamron 70-300 VC is worth that extra 70$ over 55-250 STM, as Tamron has a wonderful VC, a longer reach (about 80mm on a crop body like 70D) & better AF (manual focusing possible) considering photos and not videos ? The Tamron was the reason I saved my money, till I watched your video and got a bit confused now.
Hi Toby great video again. I have the 55-250 IS version 1 and it is extremely sharp, but the AF is REALLY slow and noisy. I know the STM isn't noisy, but is it fast now? I have an 18-135 STM for reference (and I feel that lens focuses quickly). Also I assume I'll get a 70-200 F4 IS in a few years but in the meantime would the difference between the 70-200 and 55-250 STM (in image quality not build quality) lenses be drastic?
Hi Toby, thanks for a great review! You've made a believer in the 55-250 IS STM. You mentioned that this lens will work well with a 70D. I have a Canon 7D and was wondering if this lens will also work well with it. Thanks again.
Hi, I am about to buy a 55-250mm lens. I will use it for still photography, like surf, some sport, and other medium range shooting. For the surf photography I will mostly use auto focus and I know the stm has much quicker auto focusing. I have a relatively small budget. The lens would be used on my Canon 600d. Should I get the stm version or the non stm? Thanks for your help.
Hello! I am a beginner at DSLR's and recently got a Canon T5i but without a kit lens. My question is whether I should get the 18-135mm STM or the 55-250mm STM. I plan to shoot landscapes, portrait photos, and mostly outdoor. Great review by the way!
STM does smooth focusing that is better for video in some cases. But does this smooth focusing technology cause trouble to focus very fast & instantly while still image capturing??? Which would be better for casual bird photography - IS stm or IS ii?
Your videos are fantastic. I'm in the process of buying a Canon D760, I haven't got the camera yet. But thanks to your videos I have learned which lenses I want. Just an hour ago I bought a three month old, like new, 55-250 stm lens for $100 from a nice guy with and ad on C/L. The seller put the lens on his 70D then spent an hour showing me all about the lens. Thanks Toby.
Actually the difference is lot bigger currently the 55-250 non stem version can be bought on ebay for around 150 new from Japan. While the the stem version retails for over $300. So maybe you are talking in store retail is different.
Great review I purchased a 700D with two lens included this one. Not only is it great for birds in flight and wild life it is great for super detailed shots of dragon flies acts like a macro lens and if you combine this with raw and lightroom and final product can be exceptional. Get this lens you will love it
EXCELLENT REVIEW I PURCHASED A REFURBISHED CANON SL1 KIT WITH THE 18 to 55 MM EFS ALSO 24 2.8 AND THE 55 TO 250 MM EFS ALL REFURBISHED. ALSO OWN THE PANASONIC FZ300 25 to 600MM 2.8. FUJI S9200 24 to 1200MM. VERY HAPPY WITH ALL THESE CAMERAS.
Great review. What aperture should i try to keep the lens at to give the sharpest image when shooting wildlife, bearing in mind i would want quite a fast shutter speed?
Can I use this value lens to get acceptably good results when being used for capturing the occasional portrait of friends and family. I have been absolutely astonished at the quality of the Canon 70-200 but I am not at the skill level as a photographer to justify laying out the kind money necessary to get this lens. Should I considering the Canon 55-250 as an alternative?
I think is a great review, my experience was from the Kit lens 18-55 to the 18-135 STM. I think the lens and build quality is better and then the fact the focusing just works better meant my images were generally sharper. Not necessarily due to the glass but I think the focusing makes a huge contribution.
Hi Toby . Could you make a comparison video between the 55-250 and the Tamron AF 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 DI VC USD . I 'd like to know which one you would recommend for a 70d . Thank you
+Collin Redwood the new 50 mm stm maybe ? Joking of course . If I was thinking of shifting to an FF sensor anytime soon I would give tamron a chance . I think I 'll play it safe and go with the canon . If reviews are true ,and I trust Toby to be objective, the 250 is much more than an average lazy amateure like me will ever need . Take care
Hello sir. Thanks for all your videos here for us fellow (uninformed) shooters. less than a month ago I purchased the Canon 70d, previously having the T2i. I purchased my new camera without a lens, intending to use my 15-85, my 50mm, and my 70-300 USM. With video not being of prime concern,... do you think I should sell my 70-300 that I paid around 650.00 for, and buy this 55-250 STM lens? It sounds awfully good. Thanks for your advice.
Hello, I am an ornithologist introducing myself into the EOS Rebel photography. I used to have an old Canon power-shot S3IS with 12x optical zoom and I've improved my abilities over the years (lets say I'm getting into decent pictures now lol). That camera died a couple of years ago and now I have received as a gift an EOS rebel T6, but I just have the 18-55mm that came with the camera. I have been considering to buy the 55-250mm IS STM because of the good reviews and the price, since I am in a very tide budget right now. My main goal is to get as close as possible to the subjects (birds and other wildlife) as my budget allows me. Would you think this would be a good fit for my me? Thanks
Hi Toby! I have a Rebel T5i with 18-55mm IS STM lens. I love landscape photography. Therefore, was planning to buys telephoto lens. Looking at the options, my heart goes all out for 70-200mm f2.8L II IS zoom lens but it's way out of my budget as of now. With the remaining categories, I'm unable to decide the best choice out of 55-250mm STM IS, 70-300mm IS USM & 75-300mm III IS USM lens.. Please advise accordingly as currently I haven't reached the professional level. Thanks a bunch! Regards, AD
Hi Toby.. As usual great review and ur review always helps..could you please suggest me which would be the better lens between 55-250 IS STM and Tamron 70-300 USD VC.. I already have the old 55-250 Is II and I have Canon T5..i not that happy with the photo quality of old 55-250..thanks PhotoRec Toby
I personally am not a fan of the do-it-all lenses, the lenses that cover 18-200 or more. They are certainly convenient but in my opinion you make sacrifices in image quality and convenience. The 18-140 range is about as high as I think someone should go. A lens like the 55-250 is only a 3x zoom lens so you get far less distortion and other problems vs a lens like the 18-270 which covers a 10x range and sacrifices quality to do so.
Nice comparison to 70-300 IS USM. If you included the name of this in your title/description, it would be easier to find for people looking for a comparison. When I was searching for such a comparison, I didn't come by your video.
Thank you for all your helpful reviews. They have really helped me to make my lens purchasing decisions! I have really enjoyed your videos. Please keep them coming. Liked and Subbed.
Toby, nice videos and I like the side by side comparison images. I already have the 70-300mm Canon lens for my 70D. Question I have is whether the noise mine makes is typical. When focusing I get the whir however it seems to "coast" and if I touch the button half way again it re-focuses and coasts again. How long should a typical copy coast after focus? Oh, I got my 300mm for $237 paired with the body. I have the 18-135mm STM also which is a great go to lens. Thank you for the videos. DanaB
Hi. Really like your videos. Clear and to the point. I'm going to buy a canon 70d, was confused between the 18-135mm, or 18-55mm & 55-250mm kit. Then I read that a tele extender would help to increase the range of the 18-135mm. So would a tele extender + 18-135mm be a better option. I'm just a beginner, not looking to make money out of photography. I just wanna buy something that'll suffice for (noticeably) decent above average pics/vids and easy to carry around on vacation. Also the 70d is weather sealed, is this true for the lenses as well. And carrying & changing 2 lenses(18-55,55-250) : how hard / inconvenient is this? Or will this be putting the camera at risk of dirt /water ingress. thanks very much in advance
Hello, your videos are very helpful. I just purchased a canon 70d that came with the new 18-135 STM lens. I am looking for more zoom, should I get this lens or a tamron 18-270? Is one better than the other. Or should I go for the canon 70-300? I want to make the right decision with out breaking the bank. Thank you
Many thanks Toby - I'm in the process of purchasing a 760D getting back into photography after an old A1 and Ixus. Your videos are extremely helpful as I'm looking for a good general lens. This one sounds like it might it the mark. My only concern is do I need something in the 18 to 55 rage ?
nice video! i have the canon eos m and the es-m 22mm and 18-55, and ef-s 17-85mm (from my older camera is usm) and just got the 85mm f1.8 which is great for photos of people but has to be spot on. think ill get the 55-250mm stm for having that longer range for general shooting in decent lighting conditions and since its much lighther then other such zooms (which works great for the eos-m's lighter weight) would be a nice addition for about 250 bucks on ebay! .
i had actually just purchased the 70D from Costco for 1399+tax ($1500 total) before the price went up with them. I'm wondering if you think it'd be worth returning and picking it up again from amazon just to get the 55-250STM instead. At 55 i find its too shaky to make good video and sound is already too far to make a difference if its coming from the lens or not. I'm more concerned with picture quality with the 55-250 IS II and the warranty as i know costco will take care of things if the need arises, Amazon has let me down in the past with electronics. I can hold off for another month and a half do you think the price will drop at all again in that time?
Hey thank you so much for sharing this video! I have been reading reviews and trying to find a video that compares these two lenses like you did at the end, thank you so much & great job!
does it really focus faster ? i mean not in video mode or liveview mode consider upgrade to this one cause the old one was soft on 250 and really really slow focus made life harder to me (it was a old lens using for a few years already =D)
Hi Toby, thanks for your helpful reviews. Recently bought my first DSLR and your videos helped me decide what to get more than any other source (bought the T5i body and the sigma 17-70 contemporary). I'm now looking for a tele lens and am down to the two in this video. It looks to me like the price has come down a lot on the 70-300 lens. When I search on amazon it comes up at $649, but also shows from other vendors there for $379. The titles read the same, but is there something different on the $379 one, or just a great price? If the price between the two are about the same. would you still suggest the 55-250 over the 70-300 for my T5i? Thanks!
I own a t5i(700d) and want to get either 18-135mm stm or 55-250 stm lens but im not to sure, I like the fact the 18-135mm starts at 18mm with a lower apature than the other lens wheres the other lens starts at 55mm but has the capability to zoom further any suggestions which lens is better ?
Thank you, a great review as always :) Interesting how canon improve the entry level lenses. Can you please recommend me the best zoom lens for canon70d? I have tow lenses now: 18-135mm stm 24-105mm L I like them both specially the colors in the 24-105mm L. But still not that convinced. I'm searching for a very good sharp lens with nice colors. I shoot mostly landscapes. Thank you for all the great videos.
Hello there I just wanted to say thanks for the video review. I'm a quadriplegic and I have currently a Canon 500 D and want to upgrade to the 750 D. I also use the 55-250 mm lens on my 500 D and was wondering if it was worth going to the STM lenses when I buy the new camera. From your description it looks pretty good and worth getting because the focusing is internal so you cannot knock the focusing like you can currently with the old 55-250. I also take the photos using a blower brush which is connected to an old Canon T 70 connection with the plug cut off and have a 3.5 stereo plug connected to go into the 500 D camera. On the end of that T3 adapter you screw in the bubble release for long exposures like the old days in the old cameras and I bite on the blower brush to take photos. I've had that sort of set up got the Canon T 70 camera left. I tried the current 250 mm I have on the new 750 D and it works fine the way I take photos but with your description with the focusing done internally and also much quicker I suppose I think you have talked me into getting the new lenses in kit form like I did with my current 500 D some 10 years ago roughly. I want to do a lot of concert photography and I use the 500 D currently and a 250 mm lens for wherever I get put seating wise so I need to zoom factor. While I was at the camera store looking at 750 I originally had plans to get a 2.8 zoom lens but they are just too heavy for me to hold so will have to stick with the 250 mm and the new camera is a plus factor also on the newer models is that they take 64 GB cards and also five frames per second instead of the current three which I have at the moment with a 500 D. Anyway thank you for the great tutorial Best regards Mark Sydney Australia PS sorry for the long posting to everybody about my situation and camera setup
Hi Toby..I am a fan of your review..it helps all the time..I need a help from you..actually I have 55-250 IS II lens..I was considering to upgrade it but my budget is tight...is 55-250 IS STM right lens for me or u want to suggest any other name...because IS II lens image is too soft..please suggest what would be my worthy upgrade.. most of the time i do still photography only and I have 1200D/T5..in future may be i'll upgrade it to the successor of 70D
Hi Toby, I am about to get a Canon 450d with the 40mm stm lens. My problem is I need a lens for longer distance photography like wildlife or sport. It will be for still photography only not video. I don't have a big budget. Should I get the 55-250mm stm or 55-250mm non stm. Thanks for your help, Bailey.
Hi Toby, wonder if I could have some support/advice regarding a zoom lens, I'm not even a novice or a beginner just a starter upper ☺ and I've been confused about which zoom lens to buy. While looking for a few reviews I stumbled on your channel and I like and respect your opinion regarding the equipment you use. I have a 570D with a 40mm lens but I want to take pictures of scenery (buildings landscapes and basic scenery, my dog and I'm hitting my head on the wall with which zoom lens to buy! Any help would be amazing :) fantastic vids!
I have a question on what you think of my next purchase. I currently have a T5i with the18-55mm IS STM lens. I am thinking of getting both the 10-18 and the 55-250 IS STM lenses with a 80D body to follow later. I will be using the equipment for our upcoming trip to Scotland, England and maybe the Normandy Coast of France. Does this look like good setup?
Great video review CameraRec Toby, what is your suggestion on which lens I should use for taking videos and night shooting with the Canon T5i? CameraRec Toby, the reason I was asking is because I'm planning on visiting Hong Kong in December and I want to take some awesome pictures and some videos while in a airplane getting views as well and posting them on RUclips and a DVD? Your advice would truly be appreciated and keep up the awesome work!
Triple7Diehard4ever Consider a prime lens 5 Reasons you should own a prime lens and watch my Recommended Lenses for the Canon 70D & other crop sensor Canon
I will buy Canon EOS 60D and i'm thinking is it worth to spend more money for STM version of the 55-250 or just buy the IS II ? I will shoot videos with manual autofocus, but i want fast focusing lens for sports such as mountain biking and motocross. Thank you !
Thanks for the review. I have the Canon 70D and the 50-250mm kit lens as reviewed is looking to upgrade to an f/2.8 zoom lens mainly for hockey games with poor lighting. What do you suggest? Thank you.
Hello thanks for the great review. I would love your advice. I have a Canon 600D camera with a tamron 200mm starter kit lens I have been using for about a year now. I love to photograph wildlife animals and landscapes. I live on a farm in Australia. The two lenses I am deciding between are Canon 55 250 in this review and the Tamron 70 300 VC USD that I have heard good things about. I would love your opinion as to which would suit my needs for this next stage. thanks Mandy
i want to buy canon 70d.what you recommended is to take a kit lens of 18 - 135..with it or buy the body and the 55-250 stm lens..please replayThe good for the price
Hi ;) absolutely wonderful channel is your ;-)))) Thanks for your great tips. I just bought a Canon 7D body and ordered this 55-250 STM lens. I'm very exited to receive it even if I'm more a "still photographer" Listen to you make me feel more confident about its performance. Thanks again!!!
Hey I'm an entry level photographer. I have the t1i which is a little older camera but still good enough for me being a beginner. I like landscapes, sunsets, portrait shots and don't know which lens to purchase first. 35mm, 50mm, or the 55-250 ? Any advice would be helpful. Also I shoot pics at my kids highschool basketball games.
The 55-250 is going to give you the best photos for basketball - nice close shots. Your kit lens can handle the general landscapes, sunsets. The 55-250 can do nice portraits too. I know I am late answering but you might be interested to watch Recommended Lenses for the Canon 70D & other crop sensor Canon
Hi Toby. This is an excellent review as others from you. I am an enthusiast and i am greatly inspired by your reviews & tips. I need a suggestion from you. I am planning to buy a T5i. Should i get a 18-135 MM STM kit or a combination of 18-55 STM & 55-250 STM? i am also planning to add 50 MM 1.8 M2. Please suggest.
Excellent review, thank you! I am looking at the Costco 70D bundle that comes with the 18-55 STM & 55-250 IS vII (as well as a free SD card & camera bag). Canon website has the 18-55 and the 55-250 STM bundle that Costco does not have. The price difference is about $ 80 or so. You mentioned that the non-STM lens is not so noisy on the 70D; about half of my shooting will be video but I don't see shooting in complete silence. Can you answer two questions, please? 1. Would the noise on the non-STM matter since I won't be doing videos in complete silence? 2. Is there any optical/ image quality difference between the two versions of the 55-250? Thank you.
I'm trying to decide between this lens and the Tamron AF 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 SP Di VC USD XLD for the Canon 70D. I'll be using this primarily for marching band pictures and likely some video for the same.
For video you want the 55-250 STM. That STM means smooth and silent focusing during video and the Tamron will not give that to you. www.amzn.com/B00EFILVQU/?tag=emaildpr-20
Hi, great review. I have the Canon 70D+18-135 IS STM. I'm looking for a zoom lens. Problem is I can buy the Canon 70-300 lens for €200 (used). And the 55-250 for €289 (new). So what would you do. Greetings from Holland. HU
99% of what I do is outdoor video and in some low light conditions what lens would you suggest? I shoot on the M50 with the 18-135 now and have been looking into the 70-200 f4 II
Hey Toby! Today I was shooting a graduation and I encountered a problem where I seem to be far from the stage. My 28-105 just wont cut out the work. I was wondering if this will do? And if it will take sharp nice images when fully zoomed in? Thanks!
I haven't compared those two directly but I have matched the Canon 70-300 vs the Tamron 70-300 and felt that the Canon was better and now matching the Canon 70-300 vs the 55-250 STM with the 55-250 coming out on top in most cases leads me to believe the 55-250 is better than the Tamron 70-300 but honestly they are all quite close. And then I look at the price and feel that the 55-250 offers a better value. Put the savings toward a nice prime, or just in your pocket :) www.amzn.com/B00EFILVQU/?tag=emaildpr-20 I am happy to answer more questions.
I found a smudge that turns out is something inside the lens clearly visible--CAN IT BE TAKEN APART?? Have nothing to lose--cant be used as it is. I am hoping if I get the main front large fisheye lens off--thats where it is.
I'm using 70D with 24 STM & 50 STM. now need one telezoom. what do u think is the best for using in term of IQ among these: Tamron 70-300 VC, canon 55-250 STM and Canon 70-200L f4 non IS? Thank you
Thank you very very much... all yr videos really professional and full of importent information...helps very much finally to deside... i am very much begginer...have a new 700d canon ..have the 15-85mm...and macro 100mm both new canon...now looking 4 telephoto and now short with money after all the buying and it seems that this lense is the best for me now isnt it?t
Hi. I want to use 24-105 with C100 Mark II. I can't decide between USM II or STM. Main reason why I am inclined towards STM is the noiseless autofocus since sound for my video is captured by shotgun mic mounted on camera. However, I am not sure how much video quality is better in USM II vs STM. Any guidance if I shall go for USM II or STM considering my requirements and irrespective about the cost difference?
Toby, Great video as usual! It would be great if you can do a new video focusing on the differences between the 55-250mm and 70-300 IS USM Lens. There is a promotion in Amazon with the camera $150 vs $300 and I am sure many people will benefit from this comparison. In my scenario, the 250mm STM is $200 and the 300mm is $173 (cheaper!!). What is your advice? You made your recommendation based on the price in your video, but what if the price is the same? which lens I should keep for still photos? I did some tests to compare 250mm IS II (not STM) vs the 300mm lens and I noticed that in some pictures, the smaller lens was better and in others the bigger one was better. I am pretty sure you did a lot more testing than me, so I would like to hear your feedback: Lens quality, image quality, focus, speed,... etc. Thanks in advance!
Ehab - Not sure I follow your Math. The 70-300 IS USM is selling for $537. subtract $300 and you get $237. The 55-250 STM is selling for $349. Subtract $150 and you get $199. 55-250 IS STM is cheaper. But let's say they cost the same and I was only a photographer - which would I buy. . based on my tests I'd go 55-250 STM- at 250 it was sharp enough that I could crop to zoom and have a sharper image than the 300. And when buying a zoom it is that far focal length that is important to me. But it would be tough if I was upgrading to full frame soon. 55-250 STM can get closer too and I found it to be sharper there. And it is lighter. See where I am going with this? It is hard to make a compelling case for buying the 70-300 in my opinion. It is possible but hard.
Thanks again Toby! The 300mm lens I bought few days ago when the price dropped at one night then it went back up again. The lens is big and heavy, however in some cases, the 250mm IS II lens won. I just placed another order for the 250mm STM lens and should be delivered tomorrow. I cannot wait to try it. I followed many of your advice ever since I subscribed to your channel. Great job. Appreciate all your help!
Oh! During the entire video I was just thinking to myself that your voice sounds so familiar, and now it finally hit me - you sound exactly like Mark Hamill!
Hi Mr Toby,
I wonder, witch lens is sharper between the Canon 18-135mm STM &
the Canon 55mm-250mm STM?
did you get an answer
Hi Toby, What would be your recommendation between
18-135mm STM and 55-250mm STM?
Thank
Very nice review. I am going to purchase a new 55 to 250 lens. Should I buy the STM version or the older version.
I bought this marvelous 55 250 stm a couple of weeks ago and the images taken are far more sharper compared to the old 55-250
CameraRec Toby here is my dilemma...
I am struggling between 55-250 STM and the 70-200L F4 IS. I know that their price difference is immense and I would really prefer to keep my wallet fat and happy. On the other hand, I do not want to buy something now that I might regret later and end up spending more money on the long run.
Is the 55-250 that good? Or I will be missing the L features?
I am a hobbyist photographer, I only do stills and usually that's portrait or landscape stuff.
What do you think I should do?
I know this is a real late reply but if you are not making money shooting photos then I wouldn't bother with the "L" lenses. The durability is what makes the lens more expensive than the picture quality. So if you are a hobbist then you should definitely get the 55-250STM. Most people wouldn't be able to tell the difference between a picture taken with the STM lens or an L lens. I would spend money on other accessories such as speed light which would make your picture look more professional. I hope this helps.
Africa4science thanks for the feedback.
Not late at all, as I have yet to make up my mind. In fact I chose to hold back, in case sigma released an art 50-135 for cropped cameras. Unfortunately, no sign of that happening...
After researching left,right, up and down I took delivery two weeks ago of my Canon 70D plus the 18-55 kit and the older but (new and unused) 55-250 IS II.
Granted I am 52 and deafer than average, but I have not found the focusing noise to be an issue. It probably helps that I use a Rhode Stereo Videomic Pro.
As a 'Camera + 2 lenses bundle' I like the full 18-250mm (28-400 in the 70D crop sensor) range over the 18-135 kit lens as I live on a Game Ranch and will use the extra reach.
I reckon Toby is very correct in recommending the Canon 70D together with the 18-55 and the 55-250.
When I have sold some of my yearling bulls in December I plan to pick up a wide-angle lens as per Toby's recommendation for filming my real-estate videos.
That will be it for me on lenses.
Need money for Go-Pro and Quadcopter (my excuse is to do aerial footage of farms I sell) real reason = kewl Big Boy Toy :-)
Thanks for another honest and succinct video Toby.
The Big Boy Toy is on my list too - I only need the quad copter but I don't have ANY excuses to buy so I don't think it will be under my xmas tree this year. I have done some testing with a rode mic and a few lenses - haven't actually viewed the results yet but I suspect that is solving the lens noise for you. Thanks for your input!
Hi.. Nice review.. I recently bought Canon 70D and now confused between 55-250 IS2 and 55-250 STM. Please suggest. Thank you.
A lot of people says, Changing the lens would be tedious, and it is a good idea to have a 18--250mm Lens rather than getting both 18-55 and 55-250mm Lenses. Is it really that inconvenient to Change Lenses?
I just picked up one for my M50 for like $150 and I'm amazed at how sharp it is, wide open at 250mm
I have the Canon 100D (SL1) and bought the 55-250mm IS non STM to go with it, only to find a few months later, that Canon brought out the STM version. I also have the 18-135 STM, and the difference in the image quality (in favour of the 18-135) is IMHO a lot better. Question - would it be worth upgrading to the 55-250mm STM version and selling off the non STM version? Thanks for your video by the way!
Toby, I have a Canon 70D. so much debate internally about a telephoto zoom. I shoot 95% stills. Most people say the 55-250mm STM is excellent value, but some are split between excellent image quality and mediocre IQ. I can get all lenses second hand, so the STM is around $250, 70-200 F4 IS around $800 with 1.4x TC another $200, and a 70-300 L IS for around $1000. All choices would give me 5.6 at the long end. What I am unsure of is the IQ worth the 4x price tag of these L lenses? are they really 4x better? I understand that of these 3 the IS is actually worse or older on the 70-200 F4 IS. If the IQ isn't hugely different, perhaps I'd be better off getting the STM used and another prime. I don't know how much marketing is affecting my brain right now...
I love to take pictures for small animals and birds. I use Canon T4i body. I have a Tamron 28-200 and a Sigma 70-300. Both are poor in quality. I need a 300 mm range but with a smaller budget. My question is Canon 70-300 a good choice or I should consider a 300 mm FD prime?
Great review. Which one should I buy This one or Tamron 18-200 mm. Becoz with this I will have to carry the 18-55 also. What is your view about the image quality? Please help
Great review, I am considering both lens. Is it your video or does the 55-250 show considerable vignetting especially on the maximum zoom images.
at the far zoom there was some vignetting but not more so than any other lens in this price range. Thanks!
Thank you its really helped me in order to buy my new lens , I am taking 100% according to your advise for this 55/250 STM lens . Thank you for such a great help and review . :)
Hi, nice review ! You said in the video that 55-250 will be enough for 99%, because that extra money is not worth for the 70-300 IS USM. I would like to know if the Tamron 70-300 VC is worth that extra 70$ over 55-250 STM, as Tamron has a wonderful VC, a longer reach (about 80mm on a crop body like 70D) & better AF (manual focusing possible) considering photos and not videos ? The Tamron was the reason I saved my money, till I watched your video and got a bit confused now.
Hi Toby great video again. I have the 55-250 IS version 1 and it is extremely sharp, but the AF is REALLY slow and noisy. I know the STM isn't noisy, but is it fast now? I have an 18-135 STM for reference (and I feel that lens focuses quickly).
Also I assume I'll get a 70-200 F4 IS in a few years but in the meantime would the difference between the 70-200 and 55-250 STM (in image quality not build quality) lenses be drastic?
Hi Toby, thanks for a great review! You've made a believer in the 55-250 IS STM. You mentioned that this lens will work well with a 70D. I have a Canon 7D and was wondering if this lens will also work well with it. Thanks again.
Hi. Great review. If I will be shooting wildlife, what would you recommend between the two?
The real question is - how good is this 55-250mm stm telezoom vs. the canon 70-200mm 4,0 is ? Is it still a good buy for a semi-pro ?
Hi, I am about to buy a 55-250mm lens. I will use it for still photography, like surf, some sport, and other medium range shooting. For the surf photography I will mostly use auto focus and I know the stm has much quicker auto focusing. I have a relatively small budget.
The lens would be used on my Canon 600d. Should I get the stm version or the non stm? Thanks for your help.
Hello! I am a beginner at DSLR's and recently got a Canon T5i but without a kit lens. My question is whether I should get the 18-135mm STM or the 55-250mm STM. I plan to shoot landscapes, portrait photos, and mostly outdoor. Great review by the way!
I would get the 18-135. the 55-250 is a good lens but it really starts to narrow to be a versatile lens that you need. Thanks!
STM does smooth focusing that is better for video in some cases. But does this smooth focusing technology cause trouble to focus very fast & instantly while still image capturing??? Which would be better for casual bird photography - IS stm or IS ii?
Your videos are fantastic. I'm in the process of buying a Canon D760, I haven't got the camera yet. But thanks to your videos I have learned which lenses I want. Just an hour ago I bought a three month old, like new, 55-250 stm lens for $100 from a nice guy with and ad on C/L. The seller put the lens on his 70D then spent an hour showing me all about the lens. Thanks Toby.
Actually the difference is lot bigger currently the 55-250 non stem version can be bought on ebay for around 150 new from Japan. While the the stem version retails for over $300. So maybe you are talking in store retail is different.
Canon EF 50mm f1.8 or Canon 55-250 is STM is the best
Great review I purchased a 700D with two lens included this one. Not only is it great for birds in flight and wild life it is great for super detailed shots of dragon flies acts like a macro lens and if you combine this with raw and lightroom and final product can be exceptional. Get this lens you will love it
hi i want to get the 700d with this lens also.. did you buy it amaton ? is it safe to buy the camera on the amazon ?
Should be fine
EXCELLENT REVIEW I PURCHASED A REFURBISHED CANON SL1 KIT WITH THE 18 to 55 MM EFS ALSO 24 2.8 AND THE 55 TO 250 MM EFS ALL REFURBISHED. ALSO OWN THE PANASONIC FZ300 25 to 600MM 2.8. FUJI S9200 24 to 1200MM. VERY HAPPY WITH ALL THESE CAMERAS.
Great review. What aperture should i try to keep the lens at to give the sharpest image when shooting wildlife, bearing in mind i would want quite a fast shutter speed?
Can I use this value lens to get acceptably good results when being used for capturing the occasional portrait of friends and family. I have been absolutely astonished at the quality of the Canon 70-200 but I am not at the skill level as a photographer to justify laying out the kind money necessary to get this lens. Should I considering the Canon 55-250 as an alternative?
Thanks for this review - looking forward to getting this lens on my 70D! Video focus with either auto-tracking or touch-screen seems remarkable.
I think is a great review, my experience was from the Kit lens 18-55 to the 18-135 STM. I think the lens and build quality is better and then the fact the focusing just works better meant my images were generally sharper. Not necessarily due to the glass but I think the focusing makes a huge contribution.
I agree that the focusing is a big part of it!
Hi Toby . Could you make a comparison video between the 55-250 and the Tamron AF 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 DI VC USD . I 'd like to know which one you would recommend for a 70d . Thank you
+Thorens170 55-250 STM no question it is the better value
+Thorens170 Omg haha I've the 70D and at the moment I'm considering both as well. Which one did you get?
+Collin Redwood the new 50 mm stm maybe ? Joking of course . If I was thinking of shifting to an FF sensor anytime soon I would give tamron a chance . I think I 'll play it safe and go with the canon . If reviews are true ,and I trust Toby to be objective, the 250 is much more than an average lazy amateure like me will ever need . Take care
+Thorens170 ah ic alright that's convinced me I guess I'll get the canon too haha. Thanks!!
Hello sir. Thanks for all your videos here for us fellow (uninformed) shooters. less than a month ago I purchased the Canon 70d, previously having the T2i. I purchased my new camera without a lens, intending to use my 15-85, my 50mm, and my 70-300 USM. With video not being of prime concern,... do you think I should sell my 70-300 that I paid around 650.00 for, and buy this 55-250 STM lens? It sounds awfully good. Thanks for your advice.
Hello, I am an ornithologist introducing myself into the EOS Rebel photography. I used to have an old Canon power-shot S3IS with 12x optical zoom and I've improved my abilities over the years (lets say I'm getting into decent pictures now lol). That camera died a couple of years ago and now I have received as a gift an EOS rebel T6, but I just have the 18-55mm that came with the camera. I have been considering to buy the 55-250mm IS STM because of the good reviews and the price, since I am in a very tide budget right now. My main goal is to get as close as possible to the subjects (birds and other wildlife) as my budget allows me. Would you think this would be a good fit for my me? Thanks
Hi Toby!
I have a Rebel T5i with 18-55mm IS STM lens. I love landscape photography. Therefore, was planning to buys telephoto lens. Looking at the options, my heart goes all out for 70-200mm f2.8L II IS zoom lens but it's way out of my budget as of now. With the remaining categories, I'm unable to decide the best choice out of 55-250mm STM IS, 70-300mm IS USM & 75-300mm III IS USM lens.. Please advise accordingly as currently I haven't reached the professional level. Thanks a bunch!
Regards,
AD
Hi Toby.. As usual great review and ur review always helps..could you please suggest me which would be the better lens between 55-250 IS STM and Tamron 70-300 USD VC.. I already have the old 55-250 Is II and I have Canon T5..i not that happy with the photo quality of old 55-250..thanks PhotoRec Toby
Thank you for this review, Toby!
Have you any idea of how these 2 lenses perform vs. the popular Tamron 18-270 PZV lens?
I personally am not a fan of the do-it-all lenses, the lenses that cover 18-200 or more. They are certainly convenient but in my opinion you make sacrifices in image quality and convenience. The 18-140 range is about as high as I think someone should go. A lens like the 55-250 is only a 3x zoom lens so you get far less distortion and other problems vs a lens like the 18-270 which covers a 10x range and sacrifices quality to do so.
with eos 1200d, is 55-250 stm worth the buy.. video shooting is not of interest currently . birds and landscape is of interest
Hi TOBY, is this lens worth enough in Sharpness when compared to Tamron 70-300 VC USD lens costing exactly the same.
Which one would be a better buy?
Nice comparison to 70-300 IS USM. If you included the name of this in your title/description, it would be easier to find for people looking for a comparison. When I was searching for such a comparison, I didn't come by your video.
Thank you for all your helpful reviews. They have really helped me to make my lens purchasing decisions! I have really enjoyed your videos. Please keep them coming. Liked and Subbed.
+1 like. So towards the end with the still images, are you saying USM lens for pics and use STM lens for video?
Toby, nice videos and I like the side by side comparison images. I already have the 70-300mm Canon lens for my 70D. Question I have is whether the noise mine makes is typical. When focusing I get the whir however it seems to "coast" and if I touch the button half way again it re-focuses and coasts again. How long should a typical copy coast after focus? Oh, I got my 300mm for $237 paired with the body. I have the 18-135mm STM also which is a great go to lens. Thank you for the videos. DanaB
Hi. Really like your videos. Clear and to the point.
I'm going to buy a canon 70d, was confused between the 18-135mm, or 18-55mm & 55-250mm kit.
Then I read that a tele extender would help to increase the range of the 18-135mm.
So would a tele extender + 18-135mm be a better option.
I'm just a beginner, not looking to make money out of photography.
I just wanna buy something that'll suffice for (noticeably) decent above average pics/vids and easy to carry around on vacation.
Also the 70d is weather sealed, is this true for the lenses as well.
And carrying & changing 2 lenses(18-55,55-250) : how hard / inconvenient is this?
Or will this be putting the camera at risk of dirt /water ingress.
thanks very much in advance
Great video...thx! Will this lens work on a Canon Rebel?
Hello, your videos are very helpful. I just purchased a canon 70d that came with the new 18-135 STM lens. I am looking for more zoom, should I get this lens or a tamron 18-270? Is one better than the other. Or should I go for the canon 70-300? I want to make the right decision with out breaking the bank. Thank you
Many thanks Toby - I'm in the process of purchasing a 760D getting back into photography after an old A1 and Ixus. Your videos are extremely helpful as I'm looking for a good general lens. This one sounds like it might it the mark. My only concern is do I need something in the 18 to 55 rage ?
nice video! i have the canon eos m and the es-m 22mm and 18-55, and ef-s 17-85mm (from my older camera is usm) and just got the 85mm f1.8 which is great for photos of people but has to be spot on. think ill get the 55-250mm stm for having that longer range for general shooting in decent lighting conditions and since its much lighther then other such zooms (which works great for the eos-m's lighter weight) would be a nice addition for about 250 bucks on ebay! .
i had actually just purchased the 70D from Costco for 1399+tax ($1500 total) before the price went up with them. I'm wondering if you think it'd be worth returning and picking it up again from amazon just to get the 55-250STM instead. At 55 i find its too shaky to make good video and sound is already too far to make a difference if its coming from the lens or not. I'm more concerned with picture quality with the 55-250 IS II and the warranty as i know costco will take care of things if the need arises, Amazon has let me down in the past with electronics. I can hold off for another month and a half do you think the price will drop at all again in that time?
Hey thank you so much for sharing this video! I have been reading reviews and trying to find a video that compares these two lenses like you did at the end, thank you so much & great job!
does it really focus faster ?
i mean not in video mode or liveview mode
consider upgrade to this one cause the old one was soft on 250 and really really slow focus made life harder to me (it was a old lens using for a few years already =D)
Hi Toby, thanks for your helpful reviews. Recently bought my first DSLR and your videos helped me decide what to get more than any other source (bought the T5i body and the sigma 17-70 contemporary). I'm now looking for a tele lens and am down to the two in this video. It looks to me like the price has come down a lot on the 70-300 lens. When I search on amazon it comes up at $649, but also shows from other vendors there for $379. The titles read the same, but is there something different on the $379 one, or just a great price? If the price between the two are about the same. would you still suggest the 55-250 over the 70-300 for my T5i? Thanks!
I own a t5i(700d) and want to get either 18-135mm stm or 55-250 stm lens but im not to sure, I like the fact the 18-135mm starts at 18mm with a lower apature than the other lens wheres the other lens starts at 55mm but has the capability to zoom further any suggestions which lens is better ?
Thank you, a great review as always :)
Interesting how canon improve the entry level lenses.
Can you please recommend me the best zoom lens for canon70d?
I have tow lenses now:
18-135mm stm
24-105mm L
I like them both specially the colors in the 24-105mm L. But still not that convinced.
I'm searching for a very good sharp lens with nice colors. I shoot mostly landscapes.
Thank you for all the great videos.
Hello there I just wanted to say thanks for the video review. I'm a quadriplegic and I have currently a Canon 500 D and want to upgrade to the 750 D. I also use the 55-250 mm lens on my 500 D and was wondering if it was worth going to the STM lenses when I buy the new camera. From your description it looks pretty good and worth getting because the focusing is internal so you cannot knock the focusing like you can currently with the old 55-250. I also take the photos using a blower brush which is connected to an old Canon T 70 connection with the plug cut off and have a 3.5 stereo plug connected to go into the 500 D camera. On the end of that T3 adapter you screw in the bubble release for long exposures like the old days in the old cameras and I bite on the blower brush to take photos. I've had that sort of set up got the Canon T 70 camera left. I tried the current 250 mm I have on the new 750 D and it works fine the way I take photos but with your description with the focusing done internally and also much quicker I suppose I think you have talked me into getting the new lenses in kit form like I did with my current 500 D some 10 years ago roughly. I want to do a lot of concert photography and I use the 500 D currently and a 250 mm lens for wherever I get put seating wise so I need to zoom factor. While I was at the camera store looking at 750 I originally had plans to get a 2.8 zoom lens but they are just too heavy for me to hold so will have to stick with the 250 mm and the new camera is a plus factor also on the newer models is that they take 64 GB cards and also five frames per second instead of the current three which I have at the moment with a 500 D. Anyway thank you for the great tutorial Best regards Mark Sydney Australia PS sorry for the long posting to everybody about my situation and camera setup
Hi Toby..I am a fan of your review..it helps all the time..I need a help from you..actually I have 55-250 IS II lens..I was considering to upgrade it but my budget is tight...is 55-250 IS STM right lens for me or u want to suggest any other name...because IS II lens image is too soft..please suggest what would be my worthy upgrade..
most of the time i do still photography only and I have 1200D/T5..in future may be i'll upgrade it to the successor of 70D
Hi Toby,
I am about to get a Canon 450d with the 40mm stm lens. My problem is I need a lens for longer distance photography like wildlife or sport. It will be for still photography only not video. I don't have a big budget. Should I get the 55-250mm stm or 55-250mm non stm. Thanks for your help, Bailey.
Thank you! That will help in my decision.
very nice review
Hi Toby, wonder if I could have some support/advice regarding a zoom lens, I'm not even a novice or a beginner just a starter upper ☺ and I've been confused about which zoom lens to buy. While looking for a few reviews I stumbled on your channel and I like and respect your opinion regarding the equipment you use. I have a 570D with a 40mm lens but I want to take pictures of scenery (buildings landscapes and basic scenery, my dog and I'm hitting my head on the wall with which zoom lens to buy! Any help would be amazing :) fantastic vids!
I have a question on what you think of my next purchase. I currently have a T5i with the18-55mm IS STM lens. I am thinking of getting both the 10-18 and the 55-250 IS STM lenses with a 80D body to follow later. I will be using the equipment for our upcoming trip to Scotland, England and maybe the Normandy Coast of France. Does this look like good setup?
I would get the 55-250 is stm and a 24mm f2.8 pancake since you already have the 18-55.
Great video review CameraRec Toby, what is your suggestion on which lens I should use for taking videos and night shooting with the Canon T5i? CameraRec Toby, the reason I was asking is because I'm planning on visiting Hong Kong in December and I want to take some awesome pictures and some videos while in a airplane getting views as well and posting them on RUclips and a DVD? Your advice would truly be appreciated and keep up the awesome work!
Triple7Diehard4ever Consider a prime lens 5 Reasons you should own a prime lens and watch my Recommended Lenses for the Canon 70D & other crop sensor Canon
I will buy Canon EOS 60D and i'm thinking is it worth to spend more money for STM version of the 55-250 or just buy the IS II ? I will shoot videos with manual autofocus, but i want fast focusing lens for sports such as mountain biking and motocross. Thank you !
Will my shots look better with this than my kit lens that i got with my canon 700d 18-55?
Thanks for the review. I have the Canon 70D and the 50-250mm kit lens as reviewed is looking to upgrade to an f/2.8 zoom lens mainly for hockey games with poor lighting. What do you suggest? Thank you.
Hello thanks for the great review. I would love your advice. I have a Canon 600D camera with a tamron 200mm starter kit lens I have been using for about a year now. I love to photograph wildlife animals and landscapes. I live on a farm in Australia. The two lenses I am deciding between are Canon 55 250 in this review and the Tamron 70 300 VC USD that I have heard good things about. I would love your opinion as to which would suit my needs for this next stage. thanks Mandy
hi! nice work with the vids.. i was wondering about image stabilizer.. are they the same in the IS II version and the IS STM?
tamron 70-300 vc usd VS this one
which one do you think is better?
Great overview, really appreciate time you spent with the review.
my camera is canon 600D, is this lens 55-250 STM good for it?
how about 18-135 stm and which is better? Thanks
i want to buy canon 70d.what you recommended is to take a kit lens of 18 - 135..with it or buy the body and the 55-250 stm lens..please replayThe good for the price
thanks toby for the advice 18-135 STM is very good for my 70d but in the future what is best kits lens to replace my 18-135 STM ? all over thanks
Hi ;) absolutely wonderful channel is your ;-)))) Thanks for your great tips. I just bought a Canon 7D body and ordered this 55-250 STM lens. I'm very exited to receive it even if I'm more a "still photographer" Listen to you make me feel more confident about its performance. Thanks again!!!
Hey I'm an entry level photographer. I have the t1i which is a little older camera but still good enough for me being a beginner. I like landscapes, sunsets, portrait shots and don't know which lens to purchase first. 35mm, 50mm, or the 55-250 ? Any advice would be helpful. Also I shoot pics at my kids highschool basketball games.
The 55-250 is going to give you the best photos for basketball - nice close shots. Your kit lens can handle the general landscapes, sunsets. The 55-250 can do nice portraits too. I know I am late answering but you might be interested to watch Recommended Lenses for the Canon 70D & other crop sensor Canon
Hi Toby. This is an excellent review as others from you. I am an enthusiast and i am greatly inspired by your reviews & tips. I need a suggestion from you. I am planning to buy a T5i. Should i get a 18-135 MM STM kit or a combination of 18-55 STM & 55-250 STM? i am also planning to add 50 MM 1.8 M2. Please suggest.
You should watch my 18-55 STM vs 18-135 STM - Quick Thoughts on Which Lens is Best for You!
I have watched your video on both these lens & decided to go with 18-135 MM STM which suits me. Thank you so much.
Excellent review, thank you! I am looking at the Costco 70D bundle that comes with the 18-55 STM & 55-250 IS vII (as well as a free SD card & camera bag). Canon website has the 18-55 and the 55-250 STM bundle that Costco does not have. The price difference is about $ 80 or so.
You mentioned that the non-STM lens is not so noisy on the 70D; about half of my shooting will be video but I don't see shooting in complete silence.
Can you answer two questions, please?
1. Would the noise on the non-STM matter since I won't be doing videos in complete silence?
2. Is there any optical/ image quality difference between the two versions of the 55-250?
Thank you.
I'm trying to decide between this lens and the Tamron AF 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 SP Di VC USD XLD for the Canon 70D. I'll be using this primarily for marching band pictures and likely some video for the same.
For video you want the 55-250 STM. That STM means smooth and silent focusing during video and the Tamron will not give that to you. www.amzn.com/B00EFILVQU/?tag=emaildpr-20
my tamron 70-200 f2.8 didn't play well with this camera
Hi, great review. I have the Canon 70D+18-135 IS STM. I'm looking for a zoom lens. Problem is I can buy the Canon 70-300 lens for €200 (used). And the 55-250 for €289 (new). So what would you do. Greetings from Holland. HU
99% of what I do is outdoor video and in some low light conditions what lens would you suggest? I shoot on the M50 with the 18-135 now and have been looking into the 70-200 f4 II
Have you ever used the tamron 18-270? If so, how does it compare to the canon 55-250 in terms of both picture quality and focus speed/noise
Thanks very much Toby ...I have looked at this lens and some of the reviews... do you think image quality is going to good.
With the fstop of 5.
I know the image quality is good. The value of this lens is very good.
Hey Toby! Today I was shooting a graduation and I encountered a problem where I seem to be far from the stage. My 28-105 just wont cut out the work. I was wondering if this will do? And if it will take sharp nice images when fully zoomed in? Thanks!
Hi Toby. Great review! have you tested the new Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD? I am wondering how they compare for focusing and image quality?
I haven't compared those two directly but I have matched the Canon 70-300 vs the Tamron 70-300 and felt that the Canon was better and now matching the Canon 70-300 vs the 55-250 STM with the 55-250 coming out on top in most cases leads me to believe the 55-250 is better than the Tamron 70-300 but honestly they are all quite close. And then I look at the price and feel that the 55-250 offers a better value. Put the savings toward a nice prime, or just in your pocket :)
www.amzn.com/B00EFILVQU/?tag=emaildpr-20
I am happy to answer more questions.
I found a smudge that turns out is something inside the lens clearly visible--CAN IT BE TAKEN APART?? Have nothing to lose--cant be used as it is. I am hoping if I get the main front large fisheye lens off--thats where it is.
Landscapes, sunsets, old farms barns, etc portraits and my kids basketball games. 35mm,50mm or 55-250 ???
35mm or 50mm
I'm using 70D with 24 STM & 50 STM. now need one telezoom. what do u think is the best for using in term of IQ among these: Tamron 70-300 VC, canon 55-250 STM and Canon 70-200L f4 non IS? Thank you
Thank you very very much... all yr videos really professional and full of importent information...helps very much finally to deside... i am very much begginer...have a new 700d canon ..have the 15-85mm...and macro 100mm both new canon...now looking 4 telephoto and now short with money after all the buying and it seems that this lense is the best for me now isnt it?t
Ben would the 1.4 50 mm better than 1.8 or the 35mm 2.0?
Hi. I want to use 24-105 with C100 Mark II. I can't decide between USM II or STM. Main reason why I am inclined towards STM is the noiseless autofocus since sound for my video is captured by shotgun mic mounted on camera. However, I am not sure how much video quality is better in USM II vs STM. Any guidance if I shall go for USM II or STM considering my requirements and irrespective about the cost difference?
Hi Toby, can you tell me if it will fit Canon Rebel T2i ? many thanks in advance.
Toby, Great video as usual! It would be great if you can do a new video focusing on the differences between the 55-250mm and 70-300 IS USM Lens. There is a promotion in Amazon with the camera $150 vs $300 and I am sure many people will benefit from this comparison. In my scenario, the 250mm STM is $200 and the 300mm is $173 (cheaper!!). What is your advice? You made your recommendation based on the price in your video, but what if the price is the same? which lens I should keep for still photos? I did some tests to compare 250mm IS II (not STM) vs the 300mm lens and I noticed that in some pictures, the smaller lens was better and in others the bigger one was better. I am pretty sure you did a lot more testing than me, so I would like to hear your feedback: Lens quality, image quality, focus, speed,... etc. Thanks in advance!
Ehab - Not sure I follow your Math. The 70-300 IS USM is selling for $537. subtract $300 and you get $237. The 55-250 STM is selling for $349. Subtract $150 and you get $199. 55-250 IS STM is cheaper. But let's say they cost the same and I was only a photographer - which would I buy. . based on my tests I'd go 55-250 STM- at 250 it was sharp enough that I could crop to zoom and have a sharper image than the 300. And when buying a zoom it is that far focal length that is important to me. But it would be tough if I was upgrading to full frame soon. 55-250 STM can get closer too and I found it to be sharper there. And it is lighter. See where I am going with this? It is hard to make a compelling case for buying the 70-300 in my opinion. It is possible but hard.
Thanks again Toby! The 300mm lens I bought few days ago when the price dropped at one night then it went back up again. The lens is big and heavy, however in some cases, the 250mm IS II lens won. I just placed another order for the 250mm STM lens and should be delivered tomorrow. I cannot wait to try it. I followed many of your advice ever since I subscribed to your channel. Great job. Appreciate all your help!
Ehab Abuseir Thanks and keep me updated, would love to hear your thoughts.
Thanks perfect review. Exactly what I was looking for. Well done.
Hi , i just want to ask if i can use Canon 55-250 IS STM with canon 550d ?
Thanks. I bought a canon 60 d and a 50 mm lens. Also have 18-135 that came with 60 d. I'm gonna find a zoom lens with a low aperture for basketball
They 85 f/1.8 is an inside sports photographers friend. Consider that. Or the Sigma 50-150 f/2.8. Though it isn't necessarily budget friendly.
Great review. Helped make my mind up. Purchased!!!
Hi Toby, do you think this is a better lens than the 70-300VC from tamron? In terms of IQ and build quality.
+JoshuaBenjaminA It is a little better.
can you tell me which one should i go for Tamron AF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di LD Macro or This one???
hi does this lens give a good depth of field?