I’ve been onboard Lennin and been to the Kiriov institute, although I was only allowed in the lobby meeting room. I did sell all the lighting for the first 2 22220 icebreakers, then the sanctions stopped us from selling to the later vessels.
I would like to learn more about this ship and the strength of the propellers and shafts...like how do they not get destroyed whwn contacting thick ice thats lile 5 ft thick or larger?.. pretty cool
The US has a lot of nuclear aircraft carriers and submarines. Nothing wrong with building nuclear ice takers. At least they are useful for trading and not for war.
Could you explain the scenario you are worried about ? 1 meter of water would be enough to shield those reactors if they sank…and no they can’t explode like a nuclear bomb 😅
Most of this ocean radiation pollution hysteria is pure propaganda. They say “Omg look it’s 10 times more radioactive here than background” to scare you but that’s still negligible… when you fly you get 10x background and nothing changes… they just want everyone to be scared of nuclear as an energy source because it would cure to many problems that are intentionally created to control the public
Most of this ocean radiation pollution hysteria is pure propaganda. They say “Omg look it’s 10 times more radioactive here than background” to scare you but that’s still negligible… when you fly you get 10x background and nothing changes… they just want everyone to be scared of nuclear as an energy source because it would cure to many problems that are intentionally created to control the public
WOW the wind speeds can reach 110 Mile per hour ( 180 KM) , so the icebreaker would basically sail thought it, with its hull design and also other areas of the stern which acts like a wing to keep the ship planted downwards at all time, adding extra downforce etc. ⚓⚓😎👌👍✌🦘
Ahahahaha. The ussa has one broken breaker. Russia even saved it when it broke down yet again. You ussa dupes should be grateful that Russia doesn't hold grudges.
Russians were very happy to get their Kursk back weren't they, lol ... We could help each other, Airbus and Boeing use to employ thousands of Russian friends, or you can keep your superior complex attitude
@@Levon_RnD That may well be true. And I don’t know anything about the cost of maintaining high power lasers. Of course the point would not be to actually slice through the ice, only to create enough fracturing to justify the the cost, based on a reduction in the average power required to crush the ice. The inherent inefficiency of crushing ice via propeller-induced thrust would seem to present a relatively low bar for benefitting from some form of ice “pre-stressing,” since the stressing of a crystal’s lattice can greatly reduce its resistance to catastrophic fracturing. Plus, it’s lasers.
The United States will spend a billion plus dollars designing and building a new Coast Guard icebreaker. One ship, just one ship. We should go to the Fins and Swedes and have them build an off the shelf design for 300 million dollars........3 icebreakers for the price of one. Both Sweden and Finland are part of NATO. The US needs to spend smarter for our defense needs.
I was stationed on board Coast Guard cutter Westwind, which is a wind class icebreaker built in 1944 we would go through ice that was 15 feet thick. We were just shy at 300 feet long 68 feet wide and 28 feet deep had two propellers that were over 16 feet in diameter. We were a diesel electric boat and we carried enough fuel that we could go around the entire world without getting more 125 people. Served on board for a little over two years. We also broke ice in the Great Lakes during the winter. 6620 tons fully loaded. 16,000 nautical miles so for such an old ship we did basically the same that the Russians are gonna do. They decommissioned the Westwind in 1985. The Russians actually had her for a couple of years right after World War II on a land lease program that’s where they got their ideas for their icebreakers.
so they can build these nuclear plants. For I guess not crazy money. Why can't these nuclear plants be used for civil use and produce electricity for homes and factories.??
the oil companies won't allow,scare people with the nuke threat--they already have nuke power plants the size of a semi truck trailer that will power a whole city--they run for next to nothing,easy to maintain--corruption always wins
Actually they are! At least one of them is "parked" during summers by this remote arctic russian town and connected to the town mains to help power the whole place.. saw it on YT but can't remember the reference.
Nuclear power is inexpensive and green IF you can stop big oil from funding pansies, dumb pansies, to scream Hiroshima, which is a ridiculous argument against nuclear power.
for that they build straight nuclear power plant ships one of them is operating in far Sakhalin area and its docked there. i know what your thinking but no its not possible to make them and put them in a 3-rd world countries. very dangerous . terrorism is breeding and its alive and well specially in those country's. i ll tell you something more. Russians have built and used nuclear powered auto engines since 1970"s. they were used in hard to reach mountainous areas where there was hard to supply them with fuel there for they were using electric cars and they were being charged with this nuclear powered stationary small generators in order to recharge those batteries. they weren't used in cars it was dangerous because of accident issues.
@@2012isnear-my-my-my ...yes, my bad, I had forgotten that it was a purpose built floating nuclear power station moored at the port of that town (also forgot its name) not the icebreaker as I was implying.. thankyou for pointing that out and for your further valuable comments.. Viva Z!!
In the USA, they name boats after military leaders. In Russia they name boats after Lenin, who was such a bad leader that 3 million Russians died of starvation and gulags.
If the USE named everything like they do, youd have to rename every single shit you guys own after biden(because he is the worst leader the world has ever seen)
us government is well known for giving the right numbers. How many weapons of mass destruction had Saddam in Iraq? Based on what Colin Powell said at the UN general assembly?
Saying 'two times shorter in length' is a nonsense. That would just be the reverse distance. To explain: If it were 'one times shorter' it would be zero: 1 - 1 = 0. 'Two times shorter' would be the same length in reverse, as in this example: 1 - 2 = -1 Similarly, 'three times shorter' would be twice as long in reverse: 1 - 3 = -2. Also, 'two times longer than' would be three times the length: 1 + 2 = 3.
hate to break it to you, Captain America, but Russia is a superpower. There are three superpowers in the world right now - U.S., China and Russia. Whether you like it or not, whether you look for something else to watch or not.
Is it just me or do all Russians have the vocabulary of a 4 year old? We like to make big boat, because boat is good for transport of hydrocarbons from sorbynyenshk and obalastaph
There were no Ice breakers until a few hundred years ago. The ice caps were never broken since the beginning of time, now there are 1000's of ice breakers and the caps never rest. And we ask were their shrinking? 😒
Yeah, why? Because in these ships, almost all excessive heat generated by reactors is used in the ship. Meanwhile your average 20 000 TEU container filled with plastic garbage from China vessel burns 140 TONS of fossil fuel every day when it's on route
just wondering if the red paint used on the models is the same as used on the steel ship, as wood tends to soak up the paint where as the steel hull of the real ship is different thus changes the way the ship behaves in the cold water? 🦘🦘⚓⚓😎😎
Tske a look in youtube icebreaker 22220. Project atctika. There is many videos about new Russian icebreakers. New project. Allready build 5 of 7 projected ships.
there is a documentary filmed on " 50 years of Victory " icebreaker that takes tourists to a north pole . i am not sure how old is that documentary and when was it filmed but it dose show all in and outs of the ship food and every day life on it and i think it was made some time after 2000's.
@@2012isnear-my-my-my thanks buddy, i have seen it but its not a straightforward one man living on her, its like a doco which shows you what everyone will live like etc. 👍🦘👌✌😎😎
@@Scienceforeveryone-xz1kk YES PLEASE DO A UPLOAD ABOUT LIFE ON BOARD THIS ICEBREAKER, ESPECIALLY THE LIVING QUARTERS FROM THE CAPTAIN DOWN TO A DECKHAND, SO PEOPLE GET TO SEE THE FOOD THEY EAT. 👌👌✌✌👍👍🦘🦘⚓⚓😎😎
RUSSIAN 🧊 ICE BREAKERS ARE SUCH GORGEOUS SHIPS. 😍 They look so powerful.
That’s incredible how much power that thing makes it almost seems unstoppable
That is a very cool ship. I'd like to see it in action when it's completed.
I’ve been onboard Lennin and been to the Kiriov institute, although I was only allowed in the lobby meeting room. I did sell all the lighting for the first 2 22220 icebreakers, then the sanctions stopped us from selling to the later vessels.
I would like to learn more about this ship and the strength of the propellers and shafts...like how do they not get destroyed whwn contacting thick ice thats lile 5 ft thick or larger?.. pretty cool
A commendable use of nuclear power
thank you, good project 😇
Kapal yang sangat bagus dan canggih
This thing is going to be bad ass.
Im honestly suprised they dont use azipods rather than the traditional screw / rudder combination.
I agree, but I wonder if it's because they just want it to go backwards and forwards along the same route.
Azipods are vulnerable in thick ice. Thickness >3meters
No chance of nuclear disaster. Famous last words!
3-mile island?? it almost killed Michael Douglas, Jack Lemmon and Jane Fonda..!
The US has a lot of nuclear aircraft carriers and submarines. Nothing wrong with building nuclear ice takers. At least they are useful for trading and not for war.
Could you explain the scenario you are worried about ? 1 meter of water would be enough to shield those reactors if they sank…and no they can’t explode like a nuclear bomb 😅
Most of this ocean radiation pollution hysteria is pure propaganda. They say “Omg look it’s 10 times more radioactive here than background” to scare you but that’s still negligible… when you fly you get 10x background and nothing changes… they just want everyone to be scared of nuclear as an energy source because it would cure to many problems that are intentionally created to control the public
Most of this ocean radiation pollution hysteria is pure propaganda. They say “Omg look it’s 10 times more radioactive here than background” to scare you but that’s still negligible… when you fly you get 10x background and nothing changes… they just want everyone to be scared of nuclear as an energy source because it would cure to many problems that are intentionally created to control the public
18:25 kiss of death
WOW the wind speeds can reach 110 Mile per hour ( 180 KM) , so the icebreaker would basically sail thought it, with its hull design and also other areas of the stern which acts like a wing to keep the ship planted downwards at all time, adding extra downforce etc. ⚓⚓😎👌👍✌🦘
Ahahahaha. The ussa has one broken breaker. Russia even saved it when it broke down yet again. You ussa dupes should be grateful that Russia doesn't hold grudges.
Russians were very happy to get their Kursk back weren't they, lol ... We could help each other, Airbus and Boeing use to employ thousands of Russian friends, or you can keep your superior complex attitude
Lasers. With all that electricity, I bet they could benefit from using lasers to weaken the ice.
It would be awfully expensive, ineffective and a pain in the ass to maintain.
@@Levon_RnD That may well be true. And I don’t know anything about the cost of maintaining high power lasers. Of course the point would not be to actually slice through the ice, only to create enough fracturing to justify the the cost, based on a reduction in the average power required to crush the ice. The inherent inefficiency of crushing ice via propeller-induced thrust would seem to present a relatively low bar for benefitting from some form of ice “pre-stressing,” since the stressing of a crystal’s lattice can greatly reduce its resistance to catastrophic fracturing. Plus, it’s lasers.
The United States will spend a billion plus dollars designing and building a new Coast Guard icebreaker. One ship, just one ship. We should go to the Fins and Swedes and have them build an off the shelf design for 300 million dollars........3 icebreakers for the price of one. Both Sweden and Finland are part of NATO. The US needs to spend smarter for our defense needs.
nope--the people in charge are not smart but they are very corrupt--they get paid off to ignore what makes sense
Money well spent if it's made in the United States.
@@danielmackay8099 are you kidding???? all ships made in the usa(nothing but warships) are pure over priced JUNK
Ice breakers are commercial ships genius.
@@skutchBlobaum Yes, they should be bought on the open market.
Awesome to see the technology behind these ships. But what effect does this have on the ice, considering that it is reducing each year.
Both poles have had an increase in ice growth the likes of which have never been recorded. You’re being lied to.
Lol ok
that is why the largest icebreaker the usa has go stuck...thin ice,not
Why would they spend a lot of time and money building this beast,if the ice was reducing?.
I was stationed on board Coast Guard cutter Westwind, which is a wind class icebreaker built in 1944 we would go through ice that was 15 feet thick. We were just shy at 300 feet long 68 feet wide and 28 feet deep had two propellers that were over 16 feet in diameter. We were a diesel electric boat and we carried enough fuel that we could go around the entire world without getting more 125 people. Served on board for a little over two years. We also broke ice in the Great Lakes during the winter. 6620 tons fully loaded. 16,000 nautical miles so for such an old ship we did basically the same that the Russians are gonna do. They decommissioned the Westwind in 1985. The Russians actually had her for a couple of years right after World War II on a land lease program that’s where they got their ideas for their icebreakers.
so they can build these nuclear plants. For I guess not crazy money. Why can't these nuclear plants be used for civil use and produce electricity for homes and factories.??
the oil companies won't allow,scare people with the nuke threat--they already have nuke power plants the size of a semi truck trailer that will power a whole city--they run for next to nothing,easy to maintain--corruption always wins
Actually they are! At least one of them is "parked" during summers by this remote arctic russian town and connected to the town mains to help power the whole place.. saw it on YT but can't remember the reference.
Nuclear power is inexpensive and green IF you can stop big oil from funding pansies, dumb pansies, to scream Hiroshima, which is a ridiculous argument against nuclear power.
for that they build straight nuclear power plant ships one of them is operating in far Sakhalin area and its docked there. i know what your thinking but no its not possible to make them and put them in a 3-rd world countries. very dangerous . terrorism is breeding and its alive and well specially in those country's. i ll tell you something more. Russians have built and used nuclear powered auto engines since 1970"s. they were used in hard to reach mountainous areas where there was hard to supply them with fuel there for they were using electric cars and they were being charged with this nuclear powered stationary small generators in order to recharge those batteries. they weren't used in cars it was dangerous because of accident issues.
@@2012isnear-my-my-my ...yes, my bad, I had forgotten that it was a purpose built floating nuclear power station moored at the port of that town (also forgot its name) not the icebreaker as I was implying.. thankyou for pointing that out and for your further valuable comments..
Viva Z!!
is that you Danny ? 😂
Is breaking up all that ice going to cause any long term issues?
yes
No. It’s not actually that much ice.
ahaha. it freezes again half an hour after the icebreaker passes.
Daniel from skyeng hehe 😉🖖
In the USA, they name boats after military leaders. In Russia they name boats after Lenin, who was such a bad leader that 3 million Russians died of starvation and gulags.
I’ll put money on that number being much higher! They aren’t known for giving correct information!
It's not a military vessel 😂
If the USE named everything like they do, youd have to rename every single shit you guys own after biden(because he is the worst leader the world has ever seen)
us government is well known for giving the right numbers. How many weapons of mass destruction had Saddam in Iraq? Based on what Colin Powell said at the UN general assembly?
@@stefanoslan and you are a hundred percent right my friend! 💯
I thought we all die because of global warming? Smile...
Yea they said the titanic was unsinkable. Right
Chop the ice like a carrot? 🥕
Barangayan NA
90% CGI... B O R I N G
bro is reposting
INSIDE THE ICE BREAKER ???? 😅😅😅
Kita tas kantu
Why are the people involved in the building of this ship speaking in “feet”?
Maybe translators made conversions for us. Not sure
To keep it simple for the Yanks. I'm surprised they used tonnes.
Russian people definitely didn't say "feet". It's an interpreter's way to translate it.
Para nas Uss Guam
Barangayan NA mga Social
Saying 'two times shorter in length' is a nonsense. That would just be the reverse distance. To explain:
If it were 'one times shorter' it would be zero: 1 - 1 = 0.
'Two times shorter' would be the same length in reverse, as in this example: 1 - 2 = -1
Similarly, 'three times shorter' would be twice as long in reverse: 1 - 3 = -2.
Also, 'two times longer than' would be three times the length: 1 + 2 = 3.
Puro tinopluk??????
looks impressive, but I think with the current world wide events russia is involved with some timing will be off.
Great boat, a credit to its designers. Would be even more impressive if Russia didn’t periodically invade its neighbours.
How would be the impressiveness if they invaded far away countries instead, like the US?
.
Ivan looks like a bad dude....
As soon as I heard "Russia into a super power" I topped and looked for something else to watch.
5K nuclear warheads want to know your location. Thats enough to be a super power anyday
@KonradCurse88 San Diego.. go ahead, I'll wait..
hate to break it to you, Captain America, but Russia is a superpower. There are three superpowers in the world right now - U.S., China and Russia. Whether you like it or not, whether you look for something else to watch or not.
You were defeated by rice men.
Is it just me or do all Russians have the vocabulary of a 4 year old? We like to make big boat, because boat is good for transport of hydrocarbons from sorbynyenshk and obalastaph
Yes, It is just you
Its just you
You just watched people designing and building a 70,000 ton nuclear powered icebreaker and think they sound like a 4 year old? What is wrong with you?
@@mananaVesta just a regular murican overdosed on copium because he saw on youtube that damn ruskies made something cool
You try speaking Russian
See how u sound.
Retard
There were no Ice breakers until a few hundred years ago. The ice caps were never broken since the beginning of time, now there are 1000's of ice breakers and the caps never rest. And we ask were their shrinking? 😒
Blah blah blah; then, nothing....Post the video when she's breaking ice.
A bar!!?? Drunk Russians with a nuclear reactor!! What have they done?
Commie propaganda!
Hurting Liberal.
glory to russia from usa
Russo Tsar Sharapova Siberia tribes
And we wonder why the ice caps and ice sheets are disappearing.
and? what`s the problem?
Yeah, why? Because in these ships, almost all excessive heat generated by reactors is used in the ship. Meanwhile your average 20 000 TEU container filled with plastic garbage from China vessel burns 140 TONS of fossil fuel every day when it's on route
Russian Hacker
The narration is unbearable deleted the channel immediately
You are a liar, sir! You certainly haven't deleted your channel!
just wondering if the red paint used on the models is the same as used on the steel ship, as wood tends to soak up the paint where as the steel hull of the real ship is different thus changes the way the ship behaves in the cold water? 🦘🦘⚓⚓😎😎
I am you know
Puru raka Putak
So funny that the interpreter is speaking as fast as the real russian person ?🤣🤣⚓⚓😎😎🦘🦘
Very nice vlog. Slava Ukraine... 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦
Thank you! 😃
Love to see a upload of how its like to live on board it, the food and also other aspects of living on board the russian icebreakers. ⚓⚓😎😎👌👍✌🦘
Thanks for the idea!
Tske a look in youtube icebreaker 22220. Project atctika. There is many videos about new Russian icebreakers. New project. Allready build 5 of 7 projected ships.
there is a documentary filmed on " 50 years of Victory " icebreaker that takes tourists to a north pole . i am not sure how old is that documentary and when was it filmed but it dose show all in and outs of the ship food and every day life on it and i think it was made some time after 2000's.
@@2012isnear-my-my-my thanks buddy, i have seen it but its not a straightforward one man living on her, its like a doco which shows you what everyone will live like etc. 👍🦘👌✌😎😎
@@Scienceforeveryone-xz1kk YES PLEASE DO A UPLOAD ABOUT LIFE ON BOARD THIS ICEBREAKER, ESPECIALLY THE LIVING QUARTERS FROM THE CAPTAIN DOWN TO A DECKHAND, SO PEOPLE GET TO SEE THE FOOD THEY EAT. 👌👌✌✌👍👍🦘🦘⚓⚓😎😎