Chilling moment Iranian gunboat heads towards the Royal Navy's HMS Duncan | Warship: Life At Sea
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 окт 2023
- The chilling moment an Iranian gunboat heads towards the Royal Navy's HMS Duncan. Who will back down first?
Warship: Life At Sea: Documentary series exploring everyday life on board various ships in the Royal Navy fleet.
#Channel5 #Documentary #Warships #LifeAtSea #WarshipLifeAtSea #HMSDuncan #RoyalNavy
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest shows, stories, and trailers from Channel 5.
Search ‘Warship: Life At Sea’ on My5 to watch in full.
Explore the latest Channel 5 documentaries, drama, and entertainment on My5 now: www.channel5.com/browse/Popular 
Развлечения
Threatening a destroyer whilst sitting in a dinghy, might not be the smartest move.
I don't blame you for being so out of touch 😉
@@alinateghi ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Rpgs and korners says otherwise komradae
@@F.O.U.N.D.E.R ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@@1337fraggzb00N i am sure you are going to say that same answer when I ask when will you father come back with the milk 😏
"I will illuminate you with a flare"..."I will speak to you in harsh terms"..."I will not invite you to my club for drinks"...
I thought he said(
“ I will eliminate you with flair”
Synonyms can be tricky!
"I will give you a stern look." "I will shake my fist in your general direction."
Can we have tea tomorrow?
“I shall taunt you a second time!”
I will then serve you tea, but the water will be cold.
In my mind, "I will illuminate you with a flare," is UNCLOS code which means, "I'm on page 8 of the booklet both our bridges are reading." The book is titled 'Steps to Legally Justify Lethal Action at Sea'. There's a shared understanding that the Iranians can turn the pages for themsleves and see that Page 9 is a shot across the bow and Page 10 is one round amidships at the waterline. Probably wouldnt have come to Page 10 really, but the message was communicated effectively. (Because, why else would you illuminate with a flare in broad daylight when this is taking place?)
.....would that be "extreme illumination"??.......extreme and total illumination.
@@ZEROmg13I don't know why but I cracked up laughing at this comment. Thank you sir.
@@Bone_Thugsimple, you can be in international waters. You CANT tell people to leave in international waters. It should be obvious that you dont point your boat directly at a warship without getting a stern warning as well...
There was something similar in the Black sea when a British warship was in region of Crimea before the russians seized it ...... russian pilots were buzzing very close to the British ship and ship had to attenuate down their radar because it coulda fried the electronics of the russian jets . Russians and Iranians are equally crazy .
They were exercising legal right of passage in a straits. Law of the sea.
Gotta have some balls to threaten a Royal Navy ship in what is essentially a fancy speedboat.
Not really. They know our leaders are wimpy & harmless, and our armed forces are directed to do almost nothing.
They are like those Somalian pirates. Just rushin’ toward death.
@@blake9747Theh have anti#-ship missiles.
Or high on whatever.....
@@Ferociousplayz_11: Does that change my point ?
'Your English is very poor'...That was hysterical !
he couldnt "read" it apparently, wonder why
Perennially twisted.
@zs1gaming it's a joke kind of like " yeah what ever"
"You are obviously not an Eton or an Oxford man!"
No one speaks the queens English anymore do they.
After giving the Brits so much tension with their maneuvers, mighty decent of the Iranians to at least give them some comic relief at the end 😜
When you live under numerous Ayatollahs, the Iranians may have been giving themselves some comic relief.
Tension ? The only tension they had was pity not to step on an ant 🐜 as a giant !
This was hilarious in the sense that an Iranian is telling a British man that his English is poor.
An educated professional man at that ie excellent quality of spoken English !
Thanks for explaining the joke, mate. I didn’t get that until you told me. 🤦🏼♂️
Because they iran. Not a british . You want talk british proper , talk with america my man
@@cameronlee1684 he is captain obvious of iranian dingy
@@serenityinside1 Just a pious pommy prat!
The Iranian boat probably got a shock when Duncan came up in speed.
I love that Iranian sense of humour, almost certainly whether he or members of the crew actually have worked, lived or studied in London so they are acquainted with our wicked sense of humour.🇬🇧🏴🇬🇧
It would have been advantageous to have a Farsi speaking crew member on deck to communicate with the Iranian boats considering that communication would be a problem. Many battles have lived and died by bad communication. But the crew is British
@@oldmech619They should have someone on board to speak all languages of larger countries. But the Iranians need to be able to speak different languages also.
@@oldmech619 i’m not too sure whether you’re joking or not, the international language on the high seas and of course with aviation is English that’s the way it is whether you like it or not, but I still like the response from the Iranians in a difficult area and brings some humanity and humour to, otherwise a very difficult and potentially very dangerous situation?
@@oldmech619 ..only YOU & those whom 'liked' you, care about Farsi Vs. English, so oldmech, you, racist much/often, or just when the Iranian Secret Police are looking at your child with depraved ideas ??
They speak better english then us there grand
Encountered Iranians at sea a lot while closed up as FCO in the gulf. Never had any problems, but always kept a close eye on them.
We never had to stand watch in helmets though. This seems far more real than in my younger days.
@@kellychubathere’re just wearing the helmets and body armour for the cameras….
@@Jimmythefish577 no sir they are 100% at battle stations and that's is battle dress.
@@kellychuba they aren't standing watch. they're at at battle stations , in Battle dress.
The royal navy have a destroyer, the Iranians have a gunboat. Both have right of passage. What is the problem?
When the British captain said he will illuminate him, the way the gun Boat backed off he may have thought the Captain said eliminate him.......
Same thing
no it's not, he said he would illuminate him with a flare, i just spelt it wrong..@@danieldean8949
I did .
I understood that myself like that 😂
Is it a reference to the radar beam ? I believe it can fry the electronics.
That last quip, from the Iranian... "... your English is very poor..." 🤣 that's comedy gold! Why is that man on a gunboat, put him on the stage and give him a mic ffs.
Yes a small gunboat heading for a destroyer, it must have been horrifying....
All I saw was Iran humiliating themselves. Again.
The gunboat could have weapons aboard such as RPGs that could inflict serious damage to the destroyer. So keep your inane comments to yourself
@@andrewstackpool4911 that would have been suicide, and my point still stands. But im glad you got butthurt 👍
Tell it to the USS Cole.
@@jmorrison5206 a gunboat dident attack the USS Cole now did it. It was a suicide boat packed with c4 and not an RPG 😉 while it was moored
the fact that they made a joke to Royal Navy at the end is something else
Probably just a covert way of saying: "No hard feelings mate, we're both just doing our job."
What had to be chilling was being a crew member on that Iranian gunboat.
Or in T shirts on the British destroyer.
My favorite comic relief was from a USAF video where a flummoxed Chinese Navy radio operator started meowing over the radio.
Had no idea that face-saving come-back was used internationally.
You should see Drachinifel's episode on the Russian Second Pacific Fleet, or look into the story of the HMS Gloworm
Iranians probably heard "I will eliminate you with a flare" and were thinking "what kind of horrible weapon is a flare?"
Illuminate with a flare (very basically) means their weapons are locked on you.
Illuminate with flare is basic navy codeword for target lock on you
@@thwales2520 I actually thought it was some sort of harmless shot that is a final warning.
😂😂😂
I’m surprised they allowed the boat so close!
Dispite them saying "highly illegal and dangerous" at the start, it's not illegal even in the slightest (the danger is questionable). This was in international waters, its only illegal to intentionally endanger a ship or impeed its course directly, approaching close and doing neither is legal, this falls into that case.
They legally could do nothing to stop them approaching, a warship has no legal exclusion zone around it beyond safe navigational distance (which is actually quite small), and even then all you can do is file a complaint through the courts. Anything that would directly prevent its approach could be deemed an act of war. Even with all the Iranian bluster and half threats, its all still frankly legal, its international cat and mouse politics.
A better (well bigger) example exists of why this isn't illegal. During the cold war a US carrier (USS Kitty Hawk) accidentally hit a Russian attack submarine (K314) which had been for days, shadowing the US fleet (it was inside their formation for most of that time, the americans kept coming up with theoretical ways to sink it, the russians the same to the americans, it was frankly standard practice), the submarine lost precise track of the carrier (sunmerged and alot of noise in the area) and the carrier of it (its designed to be sneaky), it surfaced to periscope depth and was in the path of the carrier, neither ship could fully avoid the other and the carrier clipped the sub (damaged its propeller, no significant damage, was lucky). Both sides declared it an accident (it was one, caused by both sides playing cat and mouse), the Americans even assisted the submarine in returning to Russian waters with an escort and tow.
no courts needed get too close and cease to exist and they know it.@@cgi2002
I believe the “why” it is illegal as a knowledge point from a veteran is if this military vessel which in open waters still acts in capacity as it’s country and the laws within, and the same as the Iranian boat. And the Royal Navy boat shot down and sunk the Iranian boat, not only would that be killing others (illegal within the laws of Britain) but thats stating an international war between the two countries. Remember it’s still a “who shot first scenario.” If the Iranians hit the tanker first, they shot first and the military vessel can retaliate and sink no issue. If the Royal Navy sinks first, it’s a proclamation for war. These things are finicky in open waters. It’s why commercial companies are having such a hard time and hiring private security with pirates and such.
@@JVHorvath1maybe because it wasn’t in open waters? Who determines what is open water & what isn’t? NATO? (The US). If they claim that it’s there waters, which is a fair claim considering the closest country is probably Iran then that Naval ship doesn’t have a right to be there, just because NATO claims they can…. Like what 😂
To the UK?
Just imagine with a WW2 Battleship : " I will illuminate you with a 15 inch shell ! "
That's the only message they understand.
would have loved to hear the Captain respond in perfect farsi
They would have Farsi speakers on board
@@jacktattis Is that a standard for the Royal Navy vessels?
@@wandery2k I would imagine if they would have Intel people that would be conversant in multiple languages
"5 inch gun, target acquired, 3 rounds rapid fire, FIRE!"
I used to own a Renault 14 that wouldnt turn as tight as the Duncan did
Stil waiting for that "Chilling Moment."
Your comment reminds me of the Richard Feynman quote on quantum physics: "If you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum mechanics."
step outside ...
It used to be to illuminate a target was to paste or target it with your fire control radar.
In international terms this is very aggressive.
I think the Brit skipper was well aware of that fact...
They all do this. Nothing but empty threats all the time. Same with Russian planes flying just within Scandinavian countries borders.
'you are ordered to keep well clear of this area' - apmsl !!. I can just see the crew in stitches on hearing THAT.!
Oh what a chilling moment old chap!
Like the response, love the maneuver more!! 🇬🇧
"I cannot read you because your English is very poor"
Smartest thing I've heard in 17 years
"if you do not leave immediately I shall taunt you a second time"
"This is my last warning." "This is my last now."
Yep, those two statements logically follow.
Royal Navy could make a whole comedy sitcom with them on Netflix LOL
Getting blown out of the water is one thing, but running away while the guys you tried to intimidate are laughing.... facepalm.
Well done, RN.
Lol. Playing silly buggers. Love the final Iranian comment and the Brit gales of laughter. Chaps got a sense of humour.😂😂😂
Love that cheeky last word they got in, those guys have balls of steel.
And brains of mush.
@@davidseverance7385 They're ranked in the top 9 - 12 countries in the base sciences (Olympiads) placing them above India (on average - they're still ahead in Physics but not in Math or Chemistry) and Japan (in all of them). They are ranked so far above many western countries that it would be fair to say they may never catch up.
And yet they attack a lion with their farts. 😁🤣 @@sammy-sj
@@sammy-sj So they were experimenting what would happen if they tried it on with a ship twice her size and as fast.... "chiemce"
When I was in the Navy, we used to train the Imperial Iranian Navy. You couldn’t make this stuff up. 🤪
Gosh that was so chilling.
🤣
I had to put on an extra jacket myself...
Brrrr
It was for the navy, they’re basically civvies in uniform.
How i wish that we'll just get along.
There are countries on this planet that specifically don't want to " get along " and need to be kept in line with military force.
@@fredbugden6935israel just wants peace, and the British do too
Impossible, england is a nation that have done horrible thing that can't be accepted. iran is right
"Your English is very poor".....I know this is a serious situation, but that radio transmission cracked me up ! 😂❤🎉
Golly. So chilling
USAF F-22 appears next to two Iranin F-4s: "I think it's time you ought to go home"
I think it was the "i will illuminate you" FAFO moment that got them to turn tail and run 😂
That was a ballsy call, threatening them with flare illumination. Wow, Nelson would of blanched at that!
Opps, we put the wrong shell in the canon
It had the desired effect didn’t it?
@@Jack-bs6zb I hope they fired that flare anyway, just to show how serious they were!
*Have. The word is have. "Your English is very poor."
@@krashd ... The correct spelling is 'have' and not 'of'. ... put your own house in order, as they say.
I thought that with the threat of an attack naval crew wore anti flash suits, you see this in all the naval footage of the Falklands war. They’re on the bridge with short sleeve shirts and lots of skin showing. Taking a round through the bridge would surely burn their bare skin whilst unprotected.
There was hardly a threat
A round from what? That canoe?
They didn't see the Iranian boat as a threat unlike the time when Russian planes were harassing the British warship in the Black Sea. They wore their anti-flash gear for that encounter.
Watching iran flex is like watching mini me from Austin powers movies.
The music makes it so believable.
And that’s a warship. Blimey!!!
The FOOLS played "Chicken" and lost!! LOL!! Great moves British Brothers!!
RULE, BRITANNIA!
O.K. We located the chill. Someone left the fridge door open.
"Illuminate" sounds so much like "eliminate." They understood that.
"If you close to within 500 yards, I will illuminate you with a flare". I'm sorry, if he closes to within 500 yards you are already well within his weapons range. The idea is to keep them far away. The IRGC has gotten the Royal Navy and U.S. Navy used to them doing this, so when they really intend to do harm, you won't even know it.
The Iranians really want to scare Western warships into firing warning shots, then they can claim that the West is being aggressive, so they have to defend themselves. Which is why Western warships should not fall for Iranian provocation.
@@Steve_SharpeYes, I've had the pleasure of serving alongside may of your lads. That said, waiting to get shot in the face is never a winning strategy. The IRIN are relatively considered to be more professional. The IRGCN are the loose cannons and the ones to be concerned with.
@@spydude38Right hold on, gap in my knowledge here. Does Iran have two naval forces? And is one of them revolutionary guard based?
@@mikeycraig8970yes they do. One is basically unofficial and the ones who usually get aggressive and then Iran basically disavows knowledge of their activities.
@@ANIMOUS8 Like a naval militia then?
Back in the 1970s Britain used to train Iranian Navy recruits at H M S Ganges in Suffolk. The tactics used by Iran today are directly from the Royal Navy playbook.
Back in the 1970’s Iran was under the rule of a shah and was much more open than it is now, but the people revolted in 1979
@@SirDailySuccessesGood, long live the Islamic Republic of Iran, long live the Islamic Revolution.
🇮🇷🇮🇷🇮🇷🇮🇷🇮🇷
Trained at Ganges in 1975 whilst Iranians were there...
Isn’t that where John Noakes did the mast-manning ceremony?
That's why you never train or sell weapons to others as they can become your enemy at some point in time.
I never understood why western countries do this.
This crew of the Iranian navy are playing with fire!!!
Nope just a flare.🤣
That flare illumination is scary stuff!
I think it's funny that the Iranian War Ship is like a Bayliner
Big balls for someone in a vessel that could be sunk with small arms fire.
"I will illuminate you with a flare," ooooohhhh scary....
Signal close action...
This reminds me of similar Iranian attacks in the 1980s and early 1990s
Or in the '70's when airliner hijackings first started happening.
Iranians…. did they say;
“ illuminate with flare“. … or
“eliminate with flair”????
“ maybe we shouldn’t stick around and find out“👍🤣
HMS Duncan-EVICERATE
Nice moves Nelson
Lol, so chilling, much wow, very whoa. As if this doesn't happen every...single...day. Been there, done that.
LOL LOL Great job team, keep up the dangerous work but stay safe!!!
I take it this chilling moment happened off the coast of Portsmouth
It took place in international waters.
Its a new Film filmed on the Thames
I walked! I crawled! I ran!
Gotta give it to the Iranians. At least they've got a sense of humour. Peace!
The Suez canal is Europe's Achilles heel. You saw what one stuck container ship did to trade. Imagine that all the time.
That's why Europe wanted to forcibly overturn the Egyptian nationalisation of it, but the US didn't want them to. The world still lives with that interference.
The route around Africa will ensure the serious pollution in the Mediterranean ends from the many Flags of Convenience ships will end.
The high costs for transit through the Suez with Pilots, will cover any extra costs for the around Africa route. It is a opportunity for Europeans and everyone who is involved in Maritime Transport to move to clean energy Molten Salt Reactor to ensure COP 28 is made a reality. The Just Transition to modern ships with excellent crews using clean energy Molten Salt Reactor will provide a solution. Europe and Europeans will lead the way, to create proper European Standards.
Thank you all for supporting the Just Transition COP 28, Peace and Prosperity for all in 24. # HeroesAtSea.
There is so much humor in You Tube comments. People are so creative.
This is my last warning. This is my final warning. This is really my last final warning, and I really really mean it.
😂😂😂
Interesting that the British naval officer used "Yards", not meters, to indicate closing distance.
yards, yes, since a Nautical Mile is Imperial... so is the individual unit, the yard.
As far as UK/Britain goes we both use a combination of Imperial and Metric for differing things somewhat in a bizarre and for the non-Britsh, in a totally insane & confusing non-interconnected reasons and measures of units,
...such as pounds weight, is usually only for cooking or specific weights of load/cargo, otherwise Human & pet weight is in Kilgrams or Stones (14lbs per Stone)and generally not in individual pounds like Americans use (lbs), unless less than a stone.
Plus while we use metric for engineering and building things, for speed and motorised travel we use mph & miles, but for walking or shorter distances meters or yards are equally used.
Our Speedometers have both Imperial & Metric on the same dial !!
@@razor1uk610There's fewer examples here in America, but they exist. And, yes, our speedometers have mph and kph, mostly so the same cars and trucks can be sold to our friends up north. 😊
Why would he use meters?
@@krashd Because, in great part, Britain uses the metric system. For instance, you can't use Froude's equations for naval architecture without entering metric measurements in.
@@johngregory4801 You might find it interesting to calculate the Froude number for a given situation using metres and seconds and then using feet and seconds.
I thought he said “eliminate you with a Fleur” and I thought jeez, things escalated quickly!
Cool as Cucumbers!👍👍👍👍👍👍
Oh no not the flare! Anything but the flare
"Your English is very poor..."
Yeah, must be my second language or something.
Can you speak Iranian?
I like how he tells them to stay clear of this area but doesn’t give any directions of where to go to avoid the area.
That kind of reminds me of The Falkland Wars in the 1980’s with Argentina.
The Iranian warship couldnt do anything anyway, but brilliant they had a sense of humour that made the RN have a laugh ...😂
They have so many navies there except gunboat and if they want they can sink it easily but war is not a game .
I love the British!!❤
what british do you love? The english ? Welsh ? the Scots? Britain is England Wales and Scotland. It`s not a nation. Please be specific . Oh and the Uk is also not a nation it`s just the "british" plus n.ireland
Gosh, that was close!
Im chilled
People saying a gun iay is no match for a destroyer have no idea what they're talking about about. This isn't ww2 where battleships have very thick hull armour. Missiles made thick armour pointless, so now most warships have minimal armour if any in most areas. A gunboat with torpedoes or anti ship missiles could cripple a warship. And when the former costs a fraction of the latter, that's a pretty cost effective trade. They are absolutely a threat to destroyers.
if the ship had torpedos it would be disintigrated before it got close or it would be disintegrated as it was preparing to fire its torpedos the destroyer let the gunboat get so close because it was defenseless
This was just one month ago and now some large vessels are now avoiding the straits due to security and ship hostage issues. Preferring to go around the cape. Is this the next flash point towards an even more unstable time in the world.
How exactly going around the cape helps shipping through the Strait of Hormuz?
I watched this series about 2yrs ago or longer and now it's crazy to hear it's getting more dangerous again
Incidents like this will only increase the cost of basic items for us all, owing to shipping now taking a more 'scenic' route, to avoid potential conflict. As if the cost of living wasn't high enough already !
The footage is from a TV series recorded three years ago.
If you read the armaments on that Destroyer, i wouldn't be scared for a second....If i was on that destroyer😂😂
HMS DUNCAN one of the most deadly warships on the sea 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
Is it like the Hood?
yawn
You must be American with that parhetic response Pat.
No way a gunship is after a WARSHIP, i dont understand water combat very well but something tells me they have balls of steel.
When you take the towel off your head, you can hear better.
Unfortunately it’s plain that nothing is going to help you think better.
It's easy to snipe racism when you are such a coward you post anonymously, you'd not make that comment in public if you wanted your teeth.
@@jerrypartington3650 Nice English grammar.
@@CraigLumpyLemke Typo error corrected.
It’s not chilling when you understand military capabilities..
And the chilling moment was his English lol even I couldn’t understand him 🤣😂🤣😂
The houth the houth the houth is on fire loll
No contest, that little thing against HMS Duncan.
Does “illuminate you with a flare” , mean, you and your boat will burn and sink with all hands?
It is Step One to that ultimate conclusion.
they where locked on to it non stop
Oh how victorious a FLARE? NIX 1 across the bow and 10 seconds later 20 to the waterline.
Chilling moment when a small gunboat heads towards one of the Royal Navy's most advanced boats...
A bit like an ant crawling up an elephant's leg with lewd intentions.
Just because it's small gunboat doesn't mean it couldn't have been packed with explosives. UK boat knows that.
@@user-zy3zd3sx2d Nobody in the bridge of the British vessel thinks that it could be packed with explosives.This is a gunboat of the Iranian Navy and not a small terrorist fast boat
It's not very a big destroyer .if iran wanted to sink them ,it would have done .also iranian have modern warships and submarine and anti ships missiles and... but war is not a game like we imagine .
The Iranian warship looks like it should be on Deadliest Catch looking for king crab.
Should have sent them Guy Fawkes. Then lit the blue paper.
" Light up the sky with Standard Fireworks "
The Lorax would have reposnded with, "That's a warship?"
At least they didn't surrender to the Iranians like HMS HMS Manchester.
I think you will find it was HMS Cornwall that had crew taken by the Iranians.
No Paul now I know this will disappoint your sad need to ridicule British military but the ship did not surrender to anyone. And it was Cornwall not Manchester. 15 Navy personnel from HMS Cornwall were searching a merchant vessel when they were surrounded by the Navy of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards and detained off the Iran-Iraq coast.
"This my last warning..." Ok Buddy.
In the FLIR image, the "Gunboat" looks suspiciously like a "Tugboat". Questions aplenty!
Iranians use a lot of coast guard sized boats.